development and the social construction of gender in india anja kovacs room 2.73 [email protected]...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Development and The Social Construction of Gender in India Anja Kovacs Room 2.73 a.kovacs@uea.ac.uk 16 March 2007](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022082420/55160c4b550346cf6f8b6069/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Development and The Social Construction of Gender in India
Anja KovacsRoom [email protected]
16 March 2007
![Page 2: Development and The Social Construction of Gender in India Anja Kovacs Room 2.73 a.kovacs@uea.ac.uk 16 March 2007](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022082420/55160c4b550346cf6f8b6069/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
The ‘face of Indian women’?
![Page 3: Development and The Social Construction of Gender in India Anja Kovacs Room 2.73 a.kovacs@uea.ac.uk 16 March 2007](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022082420/55160c4b550346cf6f8b6069/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Indicators of women’s status
Sex ratios (Census of India):
1901: 972 1971: 930 1981: 934 1991: 927 2001: 933
![Page 4: Development and The Social Construction of Gender in India Anja Kovacs Room 2.73 a.kovacs@uea.ac.uk 16 March 2007](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022082420/55160c4b550346cf6f8b6069/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Indicators of women’s status
![Page 5: Development and The Social Construction of Gender in India Anja Kovacs Room 2.73 a.kovacs@uea.ac.uk 16 March 2007](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022082420/55160c4b550346cf6f8b6069/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Indicators of women’s status
Sex ratios
Literacy Rates (Census of India):
General: 65.38 (1991: 51.63)
Men: 75.96 Women: 54.28
![Page 6: Development and The Social Construction of Gender in India Anja Kovacs Room 2.73 a.kovacs@uea.ac.uk 16 March 2007](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022082420/55160c4b550346cf6f8b6069/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Indicators of women’s status
Sex ratios
Literacy Rates
Women’s labour market participation
Women’s (lack of) property rights
![Page 7: Development and The Social Construction of Gender in India Anja Kovacs Room 2.73 a.kovacs@uea.ac.uk 16 March 2007](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022082420/55160c4b550346cf6f8b6069/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Explanations? Organisation of households in India
Social and cultural norms, influenced by caste/class and religion
Laws of Manu (IX, 3): “Her father protects (her) in childhood, her husband protects (her) in youth, and her sons protect (her) in old age; a woman is never fit for independence”.
Laws of Manu (IX, 6): “Considering that the highest duty of all castes, even weak husbands (must) strive to guard their wives”.
![Page 8: Development and The Social Construction of Gender in India Anja Kovacs Room 2.73 a.kovacs@uea.ac.uk 16 March 2007](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022082420/55160c4b550346cf6f8b6069/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Consumerist Capitalism and Gender
Increasing evidence in India that
development processes are profoundly biased against women
and contribute to an increase in gender inequity, rather than a decrease.
Example: spread of dowry in South India (Kapadia 2002)
![Page 9: Development and The Social Construction of Gender in India Anja Kovacs Room 2.73 a.kovacs@uea.ac.uk 16 March 2007](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022082420/55160c4b550346cf6f8b6069/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Powerless Women/Oppressive Men?
World Bank (1991: xv), Gender and Poverty in India:
“The culture’s very definition of the female is her association with the ‘inside’ – the home. By contrast, men belong to the ‘outside’, where livelihoods are earned and political power is wielded”
Larger agenda? Efficient women vs irresponsible men
![Page 10: Development and The Social Construction of Gender in India Anja Kovacs Room 2.73 a.kovacs@uea.ac.uk 16 March 2007](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022082420/55160c4b550346cf6f8b6069/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Powerless Women/Oppressive Men?
Women are not (always) powerless
‘model’-explanations do not hold to same extent for everyone everywhere
norms and practice do not necessarily overlap
spaces for power within traditional roles
Not all men have economic and political power
![Page 11: Development and The Social Construction of Gender in India Anja Kovacs Room 2.73 a.kovacs@uea.ac.uk 16 March 2007](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022082420/55160c4b550346cf6f8b6069/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Women and the Hindu Right
![Page 12: Development and The Social Construction of Gender in India Anja Kovacs Room 2.73 a.kovacs@uea.ac.uk 16 March 2007](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022082420/55160c4b550346cf6f8b6069/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Women and the Hindu Right
(Feminist) Agency?
But at whose expense?
![Page 13: Development and The Social Construction of Gender in India Anja Kovacs Room 2.73 a.kovacs@uea.ac.uk 16 March 2007](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022082420/55160c4b550346cf6f8b6069/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Women and arrack in Andra Pradesh
![Page 14: Development and The Social Construction of Gender in India Anja Kovacs Room 2.73 a.kovacs@uea.ac.uk 16 March 2007](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022082420/55160c4b550346cf6f8b6069/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Additional References
Kapadia, Karin (2002). Translocal modernities and transformations of gender and caste. In Karin Kapadia (ed.), The violence of development: The politics of identity, gender and social inequalities in India. London: Zed.
Raheja, Gloria Goodwin and Ann Grodzins Gold (1994). Listen to the heron’s words: reimaging gender and kinship in North India. Berkeley: University of California Press.