development strategy and policy committee a g e …...a g e n d a meeting to be held wednesday 17...
TRANSCRIPT
DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY AND POLICY COMMITTEE
A G E N D A
Meeting to be held Wednesday 17 April 2013 – 7.00pm
Civic Centre 181 Unley Road Unley
MEMBERS Councillor Michael Hewitson – Presiding Member Mayor Lachlan Clyne – ex officio Councillor D Palmer Councillor A Lapidge Councillor B Schnell Mr T Maras Mr T Horton Mr R Freeman REPORT TO COUNCIL : 22 APRIL 2013 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT We acknowledge that the land we meet on today is the traditional land of the Aboriginal people and that we respect their spiritual relationship with their country. We also acknowledge that the Aboriginal people are the custodians of the Adelaide region and that their cultural and heritage beliefs are still important to the living Aboriginal people today. APOLOGIES CONFLICT OF INTEREST
DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY AND POLICY COMMITTEE
Meeting to be held Wednesday 17 April 2013 – 7.00pm
A G E N D A
DEPUTATIONS ITEM NO. PAGE NO. 3. Public Meeting – Local Heritage Places Development Plan 1-4
Amendment 4. Strategic Directions Report 2013 5-11
Attachment Next Meeting Wednesday, 22 May 2013
(This is page 1 of the Development Strategy and Policy Committee Agenda for 17 April 2013)
DECISION REPORT
REPORT TITLE: PUBLIC MEETING – LOCAL HERITAGE PLACES DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT
ITEM NUMBER: 3
DATE OF MEETING: 17 April 2013
AUTHOR:
JOB TITLE:
DAVID BROWN
PRINCIPAL POLICY PLANNER
RESPONSIBLE OFFICER:
JOB TITLE:
DAVID LITCHFIELD
GENERAL MANAGER ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT & PLANNING
COMMUNITY GOAL: 2.4 Enhance and develop the unique cosmopolitan character of main street and shopping precincts within the City.
3.1 Ensure that urban development and infrastructure meet the changing needs of the community whilst maintaining the City’s heritage, amenity and character.
3.5 Ensure the protection, enhancement, and management of the natural and built environment of the City in order to strengthen its environmental sustainability.
REPRESENTORS: ADDITIONAL VERBAL PRESENTATIONS
ATTACHMENTS: COPY OF SUBMISSIONS OF THOSE PRESENTING - UNDER SEPARATE COVER
PURPOSE To conduct the required Public Meeting and receive verbal submissions on the Local Heritage Places Development Plan Amendment.
RECOMMENDATION MOVED: SECONDED: That: 1. The report be received. 2. The Public and Agency submissions, and further verbal submissions, be
received and noted.
(This is page 2 of the Development Strategy and Policy Committee Agenda for 17 April 2013)
BACKGROUND The Local Heritage Places Development Plan Amendment (LHP DPA), after extensive negotiation, was approved for public consultation by the Minister for Planning from the 31 January 2013 until the 3 April 2013. Concurrently, the LHP DPA was given interim effect for 12 months from the 31 January 2013.
Following Council’s resolution of its response to submissions, issues arising and any amendments considered necessary, the LHP DPA is to be submitted to the Minister for Planning for consideration of final approval (as proposed or with amendments). COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT Consultation occurred in relation to the LHP DPA 3A in accord with the Development Plan Amendments Community Engagement Plan adopted by Council in February 2012. The public consultation (required to be a minimum of 8 weeks) extended from 31 January 2013 until 3 April 2013 (9 weeks). Statutory notices appeared in “The Advertiser” and “Government Gazette” on 31 January 2013 and “Eastern Courier Messenger” on 5 February 2013. Letters, together with a copy of the evaluation sheet for the place and explanatory fact sheets, were sent to all owners and occupiers of affected properties. Letters were sent to 39 government agencies, 5 adjoining councils, 10 associations (business and community) and the two local State Members of Parliament. The statutory notice, fact sheets and relevant background studies were available on the Council web-site. There were 109 site visits and 185 document downloads. A total of 100 public submissions, and 6 state and local government agency submissions, were received. Legislation requires a public meeting to be held to give an opportunity for personal presentations to Council or a delegated committee. The public meeting has been scheduled as part of the 17 April 2013 Development Strategy and Policy Committee meeting. DISCUSSION The Local Heritage Places Development Plan Amendment (LHP DPA) affects 158 existing Local Heritage Places (146 reaffirmed and 12 to be removed) and 154 proposed additional Local Heritage Places. The LHP DPA was given interim effect for 12 months from the 31 January 2013, to avoid development that may compromise proposals before the list of places is finalised.
(This is page 3 of the Development Strategy and Policy Committee Agenda for 17 April 2013)
The required public meeting was originally to occur on the 15 April 2013, but due to unforeseen circumstances, has been rescheduled for the 17 April 2013 presenting to the Development Strategy and Policy Committee. The meeting provides an opportunity for personal presentations from the public. The verbal submissions supplement the written submissions and allow views and issues to be highlighted and for Members of the Committee to ask questions and clarify matters. The order of business will be to hear presenters who confirmed their attendance, other presenters and finally any others. A copy of confirmed presenters written submissions is provided with the report. A copy of all submissions will be available at the meeting for Members to view. The meeting is not a forum for debate or response. Consideration of a response to submissions will occur subsequently after all the submissions are collated, reviewed in detail and recommendations formulated for consideration in June 2013. A number of submissions initially indicated a desire for the author to be heard at the public meeting. Correspondence was sent to these persons and at the time of finalising the report 23 have confirmed they will attend the meeting and 20 wish to present to the Committee. Refer to Attachment 1 to Item 3/13.
Attachment 1 All the issues raised will be reviewed, referred to an independent heritage expert for advice and recommendations on any appropriate amendments presented to Council, through the Development Strategy and Policy Committee, for its consideration in June 2013. The above review, encompassed in the ‘Summary of Consultations and Proposed Amendments Report’ (SCPA Report), and Council determinations, will then be forwarded to the Minister for Planning for consideration and final resolution. The Minister will receive advice from the Department of Planning Transport and Infrastructure (DPTI), Development Policy Advisory Committee (DPAC) but principally from the Local Heritage Advisory Committee (LHAC). The LHAC, as part of their review process, will provide a further opportunity for those making submissions to appear before them regarding their submission. The LHP DPA will potentially be resolved before the end of 2013, and in the normal course of events no later than the 31 January 2014 (the expiry of interim effect). ANALYSIS OF OPTIONS
Option 1 – Receive written and verbal submissions for subsequent review and
appropriate consideration in revision of LHP DPA Allow for receipt of written and verbal submissions. This will allow for the continuation of the process of review of submissions, the matters raised, proposed response and any amendments to the LHP DPA, by June 2013. Following this, the LHP DPA can be submitted to the Minister for Planning for consideration of final approval.
(This is page 4 of the Development Strategy and Policy Committee Agenda for 17 April 2013)
There are no other options as it is a statutory requirement for Council to conduct the Public Meeting and receive verbal submissions.
Recommended Option Option 1 is the recommended Option. POLICY IMPLICATIONS The LHP DPA, and DPA program, encompasses a significant policy initiative for the future of the built environment of the City. The public meeting is an important and required step in the public consultation process and obtaining feedback on the proposals. The Minister for Planning (and Local Heritage Advisory Committee and Department of Planning Transport and Infrastructure) will scrutinise all the submissions, and Council proposed responses, as part of the DPA process. The Minister for Planning will ultimately consider final approval (as proposed or as amended) or potentially the rejection of the LHP DPA. The Environment Resources and Development Committee of Parliament have an opportunity for a final review of the DPA. CONCLUSION The Local Heritage Places Development Plan Amendment (LHP DPA) represents a significant initiative to review and expand the list of important Local Heritage Places within the City. Keen interest and feedback has been received on the proposed changes. To conclude the public consultation phase a Public Meeting must be conducted. This allows verbal presentations to be made. All the submissions and issues raised will be analysed and recommendations on any appropriate amendments to the DPA in the required ‘Summary of Consultations and Amendments Report’ (SCPA Report). The CPA Report will be presented to the Development Strategy and Policy Committee and Council for consideration in June 2013. The above SCPA Report and Council determinations will then be forwarded to the Minister for Planning for consideration for final approval.
(This is page 1 of Attachment 1 to Item 3 of the Development Strategy and Policy Committee Agenda for 17 April 2013)
ATTACHMENT 1 List of Submissions and Public Meeting confirmed attendees
# Name Property Form Attend Speak
69 M Kwiatkowski 113-119 King William Road Unley Yes Yes Yes
90 P Simic 81 King William Road Unley Yes Yes Yes
25 Mr Christiansen, Mr A Stabelos and A Stabelos
127-129 Goodwood Road Goodwood Yes Yes Yes
34 Mr A Anderson 178 Goodwood Road Millswood No Yes Yes
Mrs Smith 180 Goodwood Road, Millswood - Yes Yes
63 K Headley 180a Goodwood Road Millswood Yes Yes Yes
57 L Michos 149 King William Road Unley No Yes Yes
58 L Michos 147 King William Road Unley Yes Yes Yes
65 C Vounasis Conner Holmes
163a-164 Greenhill Road Parkside Yes Yes Yes
71 C Putland & S Greive 2 Simpson Parade Wayville Yes Yes Yes
74 A & R Donaldson 6 Palmerston Road Unley Yes Yes Yes
78 R & V Milisits 80 Northgate Street Unley Park - Yes Yes
79 G Manos 8 Palmerston Road Unley Yes Yes Yes
82 G Heynen 86 Glen Osmond Road Parkside Yes Yes Yes
86 J Morris 30 King William Road Wayville Yes Yes Yes
91 J Hancock 296 Young Street Wayville Yes Yes Yes
95 P Brunning on behalf M & K Chapley
3 Eva Street Millswood Yes Yes Yes
97 P Brunning on behalf C Angelopoulos
130-132 King William Road Goodwood Yes Yes Yes
98 J Pruszinski on behalf C Angelopoulos
67 Unley Road Parkside Yes Yes Yes
101 L Pieraccini Residents for Environment and Character Conservation
- Yes Yes
26 K and L Kottaridis 22A Ferguson Avenue Myrtle Bank Yes Yes No
51 G Kalivas and O Kalivas
66-70 King William Road Goodwood - Yes No
72 A Menadue 298 Young Street Wayville No Yes No
13 Mr G Manolakos 105-107 Young Street Parkside - No No
18 Mr G Artini 41-43 Unley Road Unley - No No
15 Mr S Carapetis 5/4 Malcolm Street Millswood Yes
31 Mr M Foord 109-111 King William Road Unley Yes
32 S Seymour-Smith 186 Fisher Street Malvern Yes
48 Mr M Cooper 15 Rose Terrace Wayville Yes
61 M Canning and P Dunstan
23 Wattle Street Fullarton Yes
80 P Wells 10 Palmerston Road Unley Yes
81 T Game 26 Porter Street Parkside Yes
83 Focus Friends of the City of Unley Society Yes
(This is page 2 of Attachment 1 to Item 3 of the Development Strategy and Policy Committee Agenda for 17 April 2013)
# Name Property Form Attend Speak
84 A Milne Friends of the Unley Museum Yes
85 S Morris 137-153 Unley Road Unley Yes
87 B Capuano 10 Eurilpa Avenue Everard Park Yes
88 R Stuart 84 Fisher Street Malvern Yes
89 J Hancock 296 Young Street Wayville Yes
92 A Likouras 105-109 Unley Road Unley Yes
94 S Morris, J Morris, M Lambropoulos
137-141 & 143-151 Unley Road Unley Yes
1 Mr P Tyson 36 Marlborough Avenue Malvern -
2 B and K Moyes 34 Commercial Road Hyde Park -
3 R Knol 2/153 Unley Road Unley -
4 Mr A Petersen 154 Young Street Parkside No
5 H Herriman 55 Commercial Road Hyde Park No
6 N Bower 19 Railway Terrace Goodwood No
7 Mr R Maurovic 54 Park Street Hyde Park -
8 Mr A Davies Resthaven
89 Greenhill Road Wayville -
9 A Mclinden and A Aitken
314 Young Street Wayville No
10 C Kabacznik 124A Goodwood Road Goodwood No
11 M Doddridge and F Cameron
14 Victoria Avenue Unley Park -
12 Mrs R Oke 13/242 Cross Road Kings Park -
14 Mr J Dunn 3 Wilgena Avenue Myrtle Bank -
16 Mr I Harmstorf 20 Albert Street Goodwood -
17 V Sanssten 19 Simpson Parade Goodwood -
19 N Cooter 50 Eton Street Malvern No
20 Mr T Franzon 207-209 Unley Road Unley -
21 D Hill 74 Northgate Street Unley Park -
22 C Grauwelman 310 and 301A Glen Omond Road Fullarton
-
23 D Duke 40 Wood Street Unley Park No
24 Mr J McBride 23 Fisher Street Myrtle Bank No
27 Mr A Casey 37 Orchard Avenue Everard Park -
28 Mr G Bennett 81 Northgate Street Unley Park -
29 E Oliver 364 Fullarton Road Fullarton No
30 Mr T Harpes 100 Young Street Parkside No
33 Mr D Thornton-Wakeford (Priest)
5 St Ann's Place Parkside -
35 No name 62 Thomas Street Unley No
36 J Schmidt St John Ambulance
85 Edmund Avenue Unley -
37 Mr P Sloan 202-202A Fisher Street Malvern -
38 J and C Mills 24 Essex Street North Goodwood -
39 B Ritherdon 1A Gilbert Street Goodwood -
(This is page 2 of Attachment 1 to Item 3 of the Development Strategy and Policy Committee Agenda for 17 April 2013)
# Name Property Form Attend Speak
40 Major G Jones, The Salvation Army
39 Florence Street Fullarton No
41 No name 310 Young Street Wayville -
42 J and J Fargher 10 George Street Parkside -
43 No name 66 Northgate Street Unley Park -
44 Mr D Crichton 1 Rose Terrace Wayville -
45 Mr H Patsouris 158 Cross Road Malvern -
46 Mr I Scobie Arts Projects Aust
12 King William Road Unley No
47 M Holden 7/30 Kenilworth Road Parkside -
49 Mrs L Haynes 9 James Street Clarence Park -
50 Mrs H Neufing 23 Fisher Street Myrtle Bank -
52 D and A Hartman 13 Frew Street Fullarton -
53 J Gilles 38 Anzac Highway Everard Park -
54 R Freeman 318 Goodwood Road Clarence Park No
55 W Pinkerton 142 Glen Osmond Road Parkside -
56 A Treloar 38-40 Mary Street Unley -
59 N Dunford 40 Austral Terrace Malvern No
60 I and T Trevorrow 37 Austral Terrace Malvern -
62 E Lawrence 16 Victoria Avenue Unley Park No
64 K Main 28 Salisbury Street Unley No
66 C Prodea 52 Eton Street Malvern No
67 L Greenslade 28 Porter Street Parkside -
68 P & K Foster 21 Wattle Street Fullarton -
70 D Burton 12 Omar Place Unley Park -
73 T Baulderstone 14b Victoria Avenue Unley Park No
75 L Salmone 1 Newman Street Forestville No
76 T Love 69 King William Road Unley No
77 Ukranian Catholic Church
18 Bartley Terrace Wayville -
93 M Damaskos 19-31 Duthy Street Unley -
96 Saunders Global 130-132 King William Road Goodwood No
99 G & B Milsom 40 Anzac Highway Everard Park -
100 Strata Corp 11584 2 Simpson Parade Wayville No-
UBED Committee General feedback
(This is page 5 of the Development Strategy and Policy Committee Agenda for 17 April 2013)
DECISION REPORT
REPORT TITLE: STRATEGIC DIRECTIONS REPORT 2013
ITEM NUMBER: 4
DATE OF MEETING: 17 April 2013
AUTHOR:
JOB TITLE:
DAVID BROWN
PRINCIPAL POLICY PLANNER
RESPONSIBLE OFFICER:
JOB TITLE:
DAVID LITCHFIELD
GENERAL MANAGER ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING
COMMUNITY GOAL: 2.4 Enhance and develop the unique cosmopolitan character of main street and shopping precincts within the City
3.1 Ensure that urban development and infrastructure meet the changing needs of the community whilst maintaining the City’s heritage, amenity and character
3.5 Ensure the protection, enhancement and management of the natural and built environment of the City in order to strengthen its environmental sustainability
REPRESENTORS: N/A
ATTACHMENTS: 1. DRAFT STRATEGIC DIRECTIONS REPORT 2013
PURPOSE To consider endorsement of the draft Strategic Directions Report 2013, following conclusion of feedback from the community and agencies on the Community Plan 2033, and its submission to the Minister for Planning. RECOMMENDATION MOVED: SECONDED: That: 1. The report be received. 2. Recommend to Council that the Strategic Directions Report 2013 be:
a) endorsed;
b) submitted to the Minister for Planning.
(This is page 6 of the Development Strategy and Policy Committee Agenda for 17 April 2013)
BACKGROUND The Development Act (Section 30) requires Council to conduct a review of its Development Plan every five (5) years in relation to alignment with the State Planning Strategy and aspirations of its community. While the last Development Plan Review (Section 30) was submitted in 2004, the City of Unley adopted a strategy consistent with the subsequent State Planning Strategy (The 30-Year Plan for Greater Adelaide 2010). Through the Village Living and Desirable Neighbourhoods Development Plan Amendment program Council has been well advanced in delivering the desired policy alignment. In 2011 the Minister for Planning requested Council to provide an updated Strategic Directions Report (new name and scope for Section 30 report), and to specifically respond to the latest State Planning Strategy (The 30-Year Plan for Greater Adelaide 2010), by the end of 2012. Due to process issues the requirement was extended to March 2013. As provided for by the respective legislation, the Strategic Directions Report (Section 30 Development Act) was incorporated as part of the broader Community Plan (Strategic Management Plan – Section 122 Local Government Act) process during 2012. Following the ‘Community of Possibilities’ public consultation in mid 2012, and Elected Members workshops in August 2012, a Draft Community Plan 2033 was prepared. Further public consultation occurred in late 2012. The Community Plan 2033 component was adopted by Council in January 2013. The draft Strategic Directions Report has been prepared in response to the feedback and specific reporting requirements of the Minister for Planning. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT An initial open community consultation process was conducted for a six week period in June/July 2012 around the comprehensive ‘Community of Possibilities’ public engagement, stakeholder workshops and on-line forums. Through the ‘Community of Possibilities’ process over twelve hundred (1200) people provided their ideas on a range of community issues. The draft Community Plan 2013 was prepared in response to the public consultation, and following Elected Members’ workshops in August 2012. A formal eight week public consultation from 24 October to 24 December 2012 was conducted, to satisfy the statutory requirements for a Strategic Directions Report, and to complete the ‘Community Plan 2013’ public consultation. The formal consultation resulted in ten public submissions and one agency submission being received.
(This is page 7 of the Development Strategy and Policy Committee Agenda for 17 April 2013)
The Strategic Directions Report (including preliminary and formal submissions) has captured and summarised applicable development strategy and planning policy issues, and proposed a program of Development Plan Amendments in response. As part of the consultation process for the Strategic Directions Report, a public meeting may be held to allow for personal presentations. In this instance there were no requests for personal presentations, and therefore, no need to conduct a public meeting. DISCUSSION The draft Strategic Directions Report 2013 is presented for consideration. Refer to Attachment 1 to Item 4/13.
Attachment 1 The Strategic Directions Report encompasses a regular review of strategic planning issues and the Development Plan to address:
implementation of the State Planning Strategy (The 30-Year Plan for Greater Adelaide) and targets for growth and affordable housing
alignment with Council’s Community Plan (and proposed development strategy)
orderly and efficient development
integrated transport and land-use planning
infrastructure planning (physical and social)
review of the Development Plan (ie planning policy) and the strategic directions and priorities for amendments
The current Development Plan Amendment (DPA) program, pursuant to the previous review under Section 30 of the Development Act, is aimed at maintaining heritage and character areas across the majority of the City whilst capitalising on opportunities to accommodate required and strategic growth, as follows:
Residential Historic and Streetscape Character Areas (encompassing around half of the residential neighbourhoods) – introduced on interim effect November 2008 and approved November 2009
Main Road Corridors Mixed Use and Residential Vitalisation - Unley and Greenhill Roads (3 to 5 and 4 to 7-10 stories respectively mixed use retail, commercial and residential development) - approved by the Minister for Planning for release and public consultation in early 2013 and potentially review and final approval in late 2013
Local Heritage Places (review existing places and propose additional places) - approved by the Minister for Planning for release, and interim effect, with public consultation in early 2013 and review and final approval before the end of 2013.
(This is page 8 of the Development Strategy and Policy Committee Agenda for 17 April 2013)
Residential Character and Growth Areas and General Policy Review (remaining character areas and designation of strategic in-fill and regeneration residential growth areas) - draft being considered by the Minister for Planning for release and consultation potentially in later 2013 and therefore completion later in 2014
Council’s adopted development strategy and the above policy program supports the current State Planning Strategy (The 30-Year Plan for Greater Adelaide 2010). Extensive investigations of constraints and opportunities have been undertaken to establish how best to address the strategic requirements. Through the Council investigations and recent community feedback, a range of matters are identified for future investigation that will lead onto further Development Plan Amendments beyond the current program. These include:
General Policy – residential laneway and accessory dwellings, public notification, complying development, car parking etc.
Unley District Centre Vitalisation – in response to outcomes of Unley Central Precinct Planning.
Urban Corridors Vitalisation - including King William Road, Goodwood Road and Unley Road (south).
Better Development Plan Conversion – revise structure, format and content in accord with State template and SA Planning Policy Library modules, including strengthened environmental sustainability policy.
Significant Trees – review and update of list of designated significant trees.
Urban Corridors Vitalisation - including Glen Osmond Road, South Road and Anzac Highway, possibly jointly with Cities of Burnside and West Torrens and Marion respectively.
Urban Corridors Vitalisation - Fullarton Road (Highgate Centre).
Keswick, Forestville and Wayville Precinct – intensified transit orientated hub around Anzac Highway, Leader Street and Defence Barracks.
The sequence of this program is yet to be determined by Council and the speed of progress can be enhanced as required by the allocation of additional resources. Policy in Development Plans is governed by the State Government pursuant to the Development Act. The Minister for Planning must give approval at all key stages (initiation, public release and final approval) of a Development Plan Amendment (DPA) to effect any changes to the policy. Further, the Department of Planning Transport and Infrastructure (DPTI) manage the DPA process and policy drafting parameters, and particularly the increasing requirement to use, and rigorously limit local variation or supplementing of, the standardised policy and zone modules of the SA Planning Policy Library (SAPPL). Consequently, it is of critical importance to influence the SA Planning Policy Library (SAPPL) and the standard policy and zone modules on offer. As an example, a consolidated and improved City-wide Environmental Sustainability policy section proposed as part of the Main Road Corridors Mixed Use and Residential Vitalisation
(This is page 9 of the Development Strategy and Policy Committee Agenda for 17 April 2013)
DPA was rejected in favour of needing to use the existing basic SAPPL modules (various). It is suggested many of the initiatives the City of Unley would envisage pursuing in the Development Plan would need to be addressed within the SAPPL. Accordingly, review of, and input to, the SAPPL, and the key standard policy and zone modules, should be pursued where possible and early in the initial investigations for proposed DPA’s. The applicable development strategy and planning policy issues have been identified and summarised in the Strategic Directions Report (including summaries of preliminary and formal submissions). The Strategic Directions Report is submitted to the Minister for Planning for review of the proposed strategic directions, priorities and program of Development Plan Amendments. The Minister may request the Council to enter into an agreement on the steps that will be taken in response to the matters in the Report. The Report will not be considered completed until such an agreement is reached. ANALYSIS OF OPTIONS
Option 1 – Recommend to Council that it endorse the Strategic Directions Report 2013 and submit to the Minister for Planning This option allows the attached Strategic Directions Report 2013 to be accepted as suitable and to be submitted to the Minister for Planning. The Strategic Directions Report 2013 proposes a program of prioritised DPAs that accords with the 30 Year Plan for Greater Adelaide, strategic directions of Council and community feedback from the Community Plan 2033. The proposed DPA program will be reviewed by the DPTI upon submission, and if there are matters of substance they would be reported to Council for direction. Option 2 – Recommend to Council that it support the thrust of the Strategic Directions Report 2013, and include specific amendments, before submitting to the Minister for Planning
This option allows the Council to make further amendments to the Strategic Direction Report 2013 before submission to the Minister for Planning. The Strategic Directions Report 2013 needs to reflect state government strategies and targets as well as local priorities, and may need to be resolved with DPTI and the Minister. The proposed DPA program will be reviewed by the DPTI upon submission, and if there are matters of substance they would be reported to Council for direction.
(This is page 10 of the Development Strategy and Policy Committee Agenda for 17 April 2013)
Option 3 – Recommend to Council that it not endorse the Strategic Directions Report 2013
This option allows the Council to decline to endorse and proceed with the Strategic Directions Report 2013 and submit to the Minister for Planning. The Strategic Directions Report is a requirement under Section 30 of the Development Act, and has been sought by the Minister for Planning. If Council were not to proceed, there is every likelihood the Minister would take over the process as provided for by legislation. Council’s DPA program would have its local content jeopardised, as determined by the Minister, to achieve the State’s goals.
RECOMMENDED OPTION Option 1 is the recommended option. POLICY IMPLICATIONS Financial / budget
A commitment of staff time, and limited consultant assistance, is available within anticipated future budgets.
Legislative / Risk Management
The State Government through The 30-year Plan for Greater Adelaide and Inner Metro Rim Structure Plan are promoting a clear direction for development growth that Council is required by legislation, and by the Minister, to deliver.
Council has taken the view that direct involvement in preparing DPA’s and contributing to the development of new policy template modules, offers the best opportunity to positively influence the outcome.
There is a State Election due in March 2014. The State Opposition has not released its Urban Planning policies, so some uncertainty exists in regard to future Planning Strategy.
Environmental / Social / Economic
The State Government expects, and is planning to accommodate, a significant population growth across Greater Adelaide.
The City of Unley supports appropriate growth that recognises the constraints and opportunities, is strategically targeted, appropriately designed and delivers positive outcomes for the community, including matters like a diversity of housing and consolidation of services and facilities.
The proposed new multi-story mixed use development, principally along the corridors, is accepted but appropriate policy is sought to support good design, environmental sustainability and avoidance of unreasonable impacts to adjoining low density heritage and character residential areas.
(This is page 11 of the Development Strategy and Policy Committee Agenda for 17 April 2013)
The policy template modules framework of the State (SA Planning Policy Library – SAPPL) set the essential parameters for development. The incorporation of local desired parameters and refinement is constrained. Influence upon the SAPPL modules through seeking reviews and input offers the most effective approach to an appropriate policy framework and scope for ‘local variations’.
CONCLUSION The Strategic Directions Report 2013 has been prepared after comprehensive consultation, consideration of current issues and alignment with the State Planning Strategy (The 30-Year Plan for Greater Adelaide) to best reflect a program of Development Plan policy amendments for effective local outcomes. Village Living and Desirable Neighbourhoods Development Plan Amendment – The Strategic Directions report 2013 is now presented to Development Strategy and Policy Committee for consideration of endorsement, and forwarding to Council with a recommendation regarding submission to the Minister for Planning.
City of Unley
Strategic Directions Report - 2013
A template form for preparing Strategic Directions Reports
Council Name: City of Unley
South Australian Government Region: Eastern Adelaide
Date: April 2013
2
This document has been developed by the Department of Planning and Local Government (DPLG) and is intended to assist councils in preparing and
submitting a Strategic Directions Report, as required under section 30 of the Development Act 1993 (the Act).
Disclaimer
While every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that this document is correct at the time of publication, the Minister for Urban Development, Planning and the City of Adelaide, the State of
South Australia, its agencies, instrumentalities, employees and contractors disclaim any and all liability to any person in respect to anything or the consequence of anything done or omitted to be
done in reliance upon the whole or any part of this document.
© Government of South Australia. Published 2011. All rights reserved.
3
About this template
The template has been designed to assist councils in preparing and submitting a Strategic Directions Report (SDR) by simplifying the process and focusing on
achieving the policies and targets of the South Australian Planning Strategy.
Please refer to DPLG’s Guide to preparing Strategic Directions Reports for reporting requirements and background information.
Completed SDRs should be submitted to the Director, Strategic Policy Division, Department of Planning and Local Government.
By hand: Level 4
136 North Terrace
Adelaide SA 5000
By mail: GPO Box 1815
Adelaide SA 5001
By email: [email protected]
For further information, please telephone the Strategic Policy Division on 08 8303 0600.
4
1. Previous reviews under Section 30 of the Act
Has the council previously undertaken a
Section 30 review?
Yes (in 1997 and 2003)
If yes, on what date was the previous review
approved by the relevant Minister?
15/06/2004
What amendments did the council
subsequently make to the Development
Plan?
- Hillsley Avenue, Everard Park PAR [23 September 2004]
- Village Living and Desirable Neighbourhood DPA – Stage 1 (Residential Historic Conservation
and Streetscape Character Area Pilot [3 December 2009]
- Adelaide Showground DPA (Ministerial)[9 September 2010]
- Regulated Trees DPA (Interim) (Ministerial) [26 July 2012]
5
2. Responding to Planning Strategy policies/targets
A comprehensive desk top review of the relevant section of the State Planning Strategy (The 30-Year Plan for Greater Adelaide 2010) has been undertaken to align the City of Unley’s Development Plan with current State Government strategy and targets. It is to be used to guide planning for desired development and the delivery of services and infrastructure such as transport, health, schools and community facilities.
State Planning Strategy - Policy/target How will the policy/target be achieved? Rationale for response to the policy/target
Provide for an additional 560,000 people over 30
years and the delivery of 258,000 additional
dwellings in Greater Adelaide
Provision made through re-zoning to achieve
mixed use corridors, residential growth and infill
areas in strategic locations within the City of
Unley
Growth yields are catered for in strategic
locations whilst the vast majority of residential
areas are maintained and enhanced through
targeted contextual policy.
Concentrate new urban growth in key locations so
the overwhelming majority of the existing urban
character remains largely unchanged.
Creating mixed use corridors along major roads
Creating infill and higher residential growth in
close proximity to fixed public transport,
underutilised land and areas of mixed character
housing
Protection of character areas.
Residential growth in areas with high quality
access to services and facilities
Existing land uses have reached the end of
their economic life
Highly valued character areas are being eroded
by demolition, unsympathetic additions and
alterations and from land division and re-
development.
Require new mixed-use medium and high-rise
developments to provide active street frontages in
the form of shops, services and restaurants to
encourage connectivity and increase public safety.
Encourage mixed-use multi-storey development
along major roads.
There is an under-supply of housing choice
other than detached dwellings, to meet
changing demographics (eg. aged person and
single person households)
Land use homogeneity and separation is
preventing the activation and vitalisation of
strategic locations
6
State Planning Strategy - Policy/target How will the policy/target be achieved? Rationale for response to the policy/target
Protect and strengthen the identity of agreed
character by enhancing the valued elements of the
existing streetscape.
Historic Conservation and Streetscape
Character Zoning within residential areas
Urban Corridor Zones Desired Character and
identified Heritage Places that reinforce their
distinct character and quality of place
Highly valued character areas are being eroded
by demolition, unsympathetic additions and
alterations and from land division and re-
development.
Set through the planning controls, unique
characteristics for different neighbourhoods,
suburbs and precincts
Prepare Desired Character Statements for
unique zones, policy areas and/or precincts.
Planning studies and consultations have
identified valued small area attributes to be
protected or enhanced.
Create a clear transition between higher densities
and existing housing precincts
Providing height and building envelope
provisions at zone boundaries.
Design response to a new urban form should
also be sympathetic to existing urban form and
its surrounding context.
Ensure urban renewal activity focuses on place
making and building stronger communities
Strengthening of contextual design policy within
Council Wide section of the Development Plan
Policy trigger to implementing development that
has regard for its place
Ensure at least 15% of all new dwellings in Greater
Adelaide will be accessible to low and moderate
income groups
Provision made within growth areas for
affordable housing
Housing diversity can be better catered for
within growth areas as a response to
demographic demands that includes affordable
living.
Ensure improvements in community health and
wellbeing
Increasing densities in close proximity to public
transport, activity centres and public open
space
Maintaining grid network of streets and
footpaths for connectivity and permeability
Introduce ‘cycling and walking’ policy
Policy support for development that facilitates
non vehicular transport
Support the economy and jobs by promoting mixed
use developments in transit corridors, activity
centres and TOD’s to ensure jobs are situated
close to where people live.
Growth areas along major roads to cater for
mixed uses, including retail and commercial
Land use arrangements that support the
economy and jobs
7
State Planning Strategy - Policy/target How will the policy/target be achieved? Rationale for response to the policy/target
Achieving environmental targets, including:
Climate change
Energy efficiency
Water
Green space
Biodiversity
Introducing a new urban form in growth areas
to minimise car dominated land uses
Introducing and strengthening environmental
policy on WSUD, passive energy design,
biodiversity, green roofs and living walls
Policy that strengthens environmental
outcomes for urban development
Minimise the risk to people, property and the
environment from exposure to hazards (flooding
etc)
Introduce Flood Hazard Mapping Development response tailored to the level of
flood risk
8
City of Unley Strategic Planning Framework
The State Planning Strategy (The 30-Year Plan for Greater Adelaide) is preparing Greater Adelaide for:
Population Growth of 560,000 people
Construction of 258,000 dwellings
Economic growth of $127.5 b
Creation of 282,000 jobs
In achieving these targets The 30-Year Plan for Greater Adelaide seeks to:
Limit outer suburb developments
Locate most new housing in current urban lands, particularly around transit corridors
Focus on creating mixed-use precincts that bring together housing, jobs, transport services, recreation and leisure
Create 14 new high-order transit-orientated developments (TOD), including the Bowden Village, Keswick and Wayville
More than 20 sites that incorporate similar principles and design character for major road corridors - eg in Unley on Anzac, Greenhill, Goodwood, King William, Unley and Glen Osmond Roads.
The overall growth targets are allocated into regions and the Eastern Adelaide Region, which incorporates the City of Unley, has a growth target of 37,700
population and 18,400 dwellings. The DPTI nominal growth target for Unley as stipulated in the DPTI presentation to Council in 2011 is 2,500 dwellings. The
City’s plan for key strategic locations and transit corridors indicates a likely growth of 2,800 to 4,400 extra dwellings, comfortably above the nominal target.
The City of Unley vision is for a ‘sustainable’ city that recognises its historic evolution (as one of the most densely developed Council areas in Adelaide), close-knit network of strip shopping and business centres, and the benefits of capitalising on a ‘compact and efficient city’ model of development, which can:
maintain desired neighbourhood heritage and streetscape character areas and desired building stock, and their community and cultural identity;
facilitate local population growth by targeting sensitive in-fill and intensive development in suitable strategic locations and key transit corridors and service centres;
provide higher dwelling densities and additional people near activity centres, and/or public transport, to underpin their activation, and to consolidate current, and attract new, businesses, services and facilities;
promote dwelling diversity to suit changing demographics, and provide smaller and more affordable options to suit older residents and attract new young residents, and also free-up use of larger dwellings for larger households (families);
recognise and reinforce the streetscape and building character, iconic brand and vibrancy of the City’s distinct ‘villages’ by retaining valued building facades and sensitively incorporating new complementary higher density mixed use developments;
promote improving Unley’s liveability, with enhanced local facilities, services and pedestrian friendly roads with less traffic, by encouraging enhanced public transport, cycling and walking networks, that can service local needs and regional commuters.
9
City of Unley Strategic Analysis Plan
10
3. Development Plan Amendment program
In accordance with the State Planning Strategy (The 30-Year Plan for Greater Adelaide 2010), and the requirements of the Development Act for policy within
the Development Plan to support its strategies and targets, the City of Unley is implementing a Development Plan Amendment (DPA) program which provides
for the securing of heritage and character areas across the majority of the City whilst capitalising on opportunities to accommodate required and strategic
growth. The current DPA program includes:
Residential Historic and Streetscape Character Areas (encompassing around half of the residential neighbourhoods) – introduced on interim effect November 2008 and approved November 2009
Main Road Corridors Mixed Use and Residential Vitalisation - Unley and Greenhill Roads (3 to 5 and 4 to 7-10 stories respectively mixed use retail, commercial and residential development) - draft approved by the Minister for Planning for release with public consultation in early 2013 and potentially review and final approval in late 2013
Residential Character and Growth Areas and General Policy Review (remaining character areas and designation of strategic in-fill and regeneration residential growth areas) - draft being consider by the Minister for Planning for release potentially in later 2013
Local Heritage Places (review existing places and propose a range of further places) - draft approved by the Minister for Planning for release, and interim effect, with public consultation in early 2013 and review and final approval before the end of 2013.
A range of potential matters have been identified for future investigation and policy change that will lead onto further Development Plan Amendments beyond the current program. Both current and proposed Development Plan Amendments are detailed in the following tables.
Policy contained within Development Plans is governed by the State Government pursuant to the Development Act. The Minister for Planning must give
approval at all key stages (initiation, public release and final approval) of a Development Plan Amendment (DPA) to effect any changes to the policy. Further,
the Department of Planning Transport and Infrastructure (DPTI) manage the DPA process and policy drafting parameters, and particularly the increasing
requirement to use, and rigorously limit local variations or supplementing of, the standardised policy modules of the SA Planning Policy Library.
Consequently, it is of critical importance to influence the SA Planning Policy Library and the standard policy modules. For example, a consolidated and
improved City Wide Environmental Sustainability policy section initially proposed as part of the Main Road Corridors Mixed Use and Residential Vitalisation
DPA was rejected by DPTI in favour of the existing basic modules (various).
Many of the initiatives the City of Unley would wish to pursue in amending Development Plan policy need to be addressed via module review, as local
variations are severely restricted. Accordingly, having input into the SA Planning Policy Library review process, should be pursued where possible to support
the future investigations for proposed DPA’s.
11
Current DPA program
1. Main Road Corridor Mixed Use and Residential Vitalisation (Greenhill and Unley Roads)
Scope Timing *
The DPA will facilitate a new urban form along priority major roads within the City of Unley to achieve the
demographic, growth and land use targets of the Planning Strategy.
2011 (commenced) - 2013 (consult, review and
final approval)
2. Local Heritage Places
Scope Timing *
The DPA will update Local Heritage Places within the City of Unley to protect and strengthen the identity of
agreed character and valued elements as supported by the Planning Strategy.
2008 (commenced) - 2013 (consult, review and
final approval)
3. Residential Character, Growth Areas and Council Wide Residential Policy
Scope Timing *
The DPA will review and update zoning for residential character (part), infill and growth areas within the
City of Unley and the Council Wide Section to achieve the demographic, growth and land use targets of
the Planning Strategy.
2009 (commenced) - 2013/14 (awaiting approval
to release and consult, and process)
* Timing subject to progress with statutory stages (ie DPTI/Minister approvals) and level of commitment and availability of Council resources throughout the projects.
12
Proposed DPA program
4. General
Scope Timing *
The DPA will incorporate a range of general policy reviews (residential laneways and accessory dwellings,
public notification, complying development, outdoor advertising, off-street car parking, shop and office floor
area limits, commercial heritage building adaptability) to update and reflect planning system changes.
2013/14 (commence) – 2014/15 (consult, review
and final approval)
5. Unley District Centre Vitalisation
Scope Timing *
The DPA will incorporate policy/concept plan changes to the District Centre in response to investigations
coming from the Unley Centre Precinct Planning Project which aims to achieve economic vitality, growth,
public realm and connectivity outcomes around strategic activity centres.
2014/15 (commence) – 2015/16 (consult, review
and final approval)
6. Urban Corridors (Goodwood, King William & Unley (southern end) Roads)
Scope Timing *
The DPA will facilitate a new urban form along major roads within the City of Unley to achieve the
demographic, growth and land use targets of the Planning Strategy.
2015/16 (commence) – 2016/17 (consult, review
and final approval)
7. Better Development Plan
Scope Timing *
The DPA will complete a change in the structure of the Development Plan to provide consistency with the
plan model and incorporate updated State Planning Library policies and mapping to achieve the reform
agenda of the State Government. Also strengthen Environmental Sustainability policy as part of a Module
update process.
2016/17 (commence) – 2017/18 (consult, review
and final approval)
* Timing subject to progress with statutory stages (ie DPTI/Minister approvals) and level of commitment and availability of Council resources throughout the projects.
13
Proposed DPA program
8 Significant Trees
Scope Timing *
The DPA will review and update the list of significant trees, in recognition of the Regulated Trees
Ministerial DPA and elapsed time since original implementation.
2017/18 (commence) – 2018/19 (consult, review
and final approval)
9. Urban Corridors (Glen Osmond, South Road and Anzac Highway Roads)
Scope Timing *
The DPA will facilitate a new urban form along major roads within the City of Unley to achieve the
demographic, growth and land use targets of the Planning Strategy. Possibly jointly prepared with Cities of
Burnside and West Torrens and Marion respectively.
2018/19 (commence) – 2019/20 (consult, review
and final approval)
10. Highgate Centre
Scope Timing *
The DPA will deliver Main Street Corridors Vitalisation for Fullarton Road Highgate Centre. 2019/20 (commence) – 2020/21 (consult, review
and final approval)
11. Keswick, Forestville and Wayville Precinct
Scope Timing *
The DPA will introduce zoning and policy changes to the Keswick Barracks site to achieve development
outcomes envisaged for a designated Transport Oriented Design Site. The DPA is subject to resolution of
an appropriate Precinct Plan and potential for re-development.
2020/21 (commence) – 2021/22 (consult, review
and final approval)
* Timing subject to progress with statutory stages (ie DPTI/Minister approvals) and level of commitment and availability of Council resources throughout the projects.
14
4. Consultation
Public consultation
Councils must undertake formal public consultation on a Strategic Directions Report for a period of eight weeks and accept written submissions from the
public during the same period (pursuant to section 30 (3) of the Development Act 1993).
Please indicate which public consultation activities were undertaken in relation to the drafting of the SDR and the results of that consultation.
Public consultation period: Preliminary six week period in June/July 2012 as part of the ‘Community Plan – a community of
possibilities’ public consultation
Formal eight week period from 24 October – 24 December 2012 as part of the ‘Community Plan – a
community of possibilities’ public consultation
Number of written submissions received: 1200 people provided their ideas on a range of community issues and the planning issues have been
selected and summarised in the table (preliminary submissions)
10 submissions were received (formal submissions)
Submissions received from: Summary of comments Proposed Development Plan response
‘Preliminary’ submissions (summarised public responses)
Change the rules for development to allow
medium density development from
affordable to top end living
Covered under existing suite of DPA’s – Main
Road Corridors Mixed Use and Residential
Vitalisation DPA; proposed Main Road Corridor
Vitalisation DPA’s (King William Road, Goodwood
Road, Glen Osmond Road, Unley Road (south)
and Fullarton Road (Highgate Centre); Keswick,
Forestville and Wayville Precinct transit orientated
development (TOD) and Residential Character and
Growth Areas and General Policy Review DPA
15
Submissions received from: Summary of comments Proposed Development Plan response
Development opportunities within
Showgrounds and Keswick Barracks
Recent Ministerial DPA for Showgrounds
(9 Sept 2010).
Keswick Barracks identified as a potential
TOD site in 30 Year Plan and Unley has
undertaken structure planning. DPA not
likely in the short term unless Department
of Defence ownership issues are
addressed.
Adaptive reuse of older buildings for youth.
Arts and small business incubation
Supported through the introduction of
mixed use zones in the Main Road
Corridors Mixed Use and Residential
Vitalisation DPA and proposed Main Road
Corridor Vitalisation DPA’s (King William
Road, Goodwood Road, Glen Osmond
Road, Unley Road (south) and Fullarton
Road (Highgate Centre) and possibly in
the Keswick, Forestville and Wayville
Precinct TOD site
Doing and not just planning
Noted
Roof top gardens and green walls
Supported by new policy within higher
density zones, including Main Road
Corridors Mixed Use and Residential
Vitalisation DPA and Residential Character
and Growth Areas and General Policy
Review DPA
More open space and green spaces Strategies to provide better connectivity
16
Submissions received from: Summary of comments Proposed Development Plan response
with existing high quality public open
spaces (eg. Adelaide Park Lands and
Unley Oval) through Main Road Corridors
Mixed Use and Residential Vitalisation
(Greenhill Road) DPA and the proposed
Unley District Centre Vitalisation DPA
Encourage pedestrian and cycling
Supported by new policy within higher
density mixed use zones, including Main
Road Corridors Mixed Use and Residential
Vitalisation DPA and future Main Road
Corridors DPA’s
Council’s Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan
WSUD measures for development
To be incorporated into a future BDP DPA
Sustainable housing
Incorporate within Desired Character
Statements for residential zones
Strengthen within a future BDP DPA
Traffic calming along Unley Road and
introduce tram from Adelaide City to Cross
Road and divert vehicle traffic to
Goodwood and Fullarton Roads
Proposed Unley District Centre Vitalisation
DPA and Main Road Corridors Mixed Use
and Residential Vitalisation (Unley Road)
DPA
Activate laneways with higher density
housing
Proposed Residential Laneways and
Accessory Dwellings DPA
Redevelopment of Unley Shopping Centre
and relocate car parking from main street
Proposed Unley District Centre Vitalisation
DPA
17
Submissions received from: Summary of comments Proposed Development Plan response
frontages
Encourage public transport and pedestrian
crossings for greater connectivity
Various DPA’s are supporting higher
density development in close proximity to
public transport and encouraging walkable
neighbourhoods
Multi-storey buildings to have adequate
underground or on-site car parking
Car parking provision policy is based upon
land use demands, proximity to public
transport, affordable housing and times of
use for mixed use developments
Maintain historic architecture
Supported as a key strategy and balanced
with new development in selected areas
within Council DPA’s
Balance character areas with innovative
and well designed new housing
Supported as a key strategy within Council
DPA’s
Provide safe public places
Supported by encouraging well designed
residential living and increased casual
surveillance around public open space
No need for increased density living if
control population growth
Population growth is a key strategy of the
30 Year Plan for Greater Adelaide that
Council must have regard to with any
amendments to its Development Plan
18
Submissions received from: Summary of comments Proposed Development Plan response
Formal Consultation Submissions
Stephen Hains Well balanced and sound as a basis for
future policy. Tighten up the performance
indicators so they are clearly measurable.
Noted for Community Plan but no need to
develop a Development Plan response
Nathan Sim (City of West Torrens) Support combining the Community Plan
and Strategic Directions Report
Need to also have an Action Plan that
identifies priority allocation of proposed
projects
Be cautious with the use of indicators and
the need for them to be measurable
Noted for Community Plan but no need to
develop a Development Plan response
Peter Croft Innovative approach for community
involvement (Community Plan)
The greening/sustainability aspect does
not come through in the Vision Statement
within the Community Plan
No clear reference to Food Security
Noted for Community Plan
Urban area greening and food security is
supported by new ‘green roof/walls’ policy
within higher density zones, including Main
Road Corridors Mixed Use and Residential
Vitalisation DPA and Residential Character
and Growth Areas and General Policy
Review DPA
John H Equitable and sufficient car parking
throughout the City is a good idea
Intend to develop (Leader Street) medium
density, affordable and ‘green’ housing
Car parking provisions can be updated as
part of a BDP DPA or General DPA
Higher density supported in the Adelaide
Showgrounds DPA (Ministerial)[Sept 2010]
or Residential Character and Growth
Areas and General Policy Review DPA
Pat… Pea… Agreement on approach to ‘connect,
contribute and communicate’ but need to
show how this will happen
Noted for Community Plan but no need to
develop a Development Plan response
19
Submissions received from: Summary of comments Proposed Development Plan response
V.J. Goode Sustainability across all areas of planning
to ensure a vibrant community
Population growth accommodated without
pressure on services and liveability
Address issue of encouraging affordable
housing into Unley
Increasing density to be targeted to
desired areas with higher levels of
services and infrastructure
State government affordable housing
targets supported by new policy
Friends of City of Unley Positive focus is commended with view to
future while preserving heritage, cultural
diversity and positive elements of Unley
High technology/ green employment more
critical than promoting high rise
development
Ample car parking is crucial for business
sustainability along main roads and it is
dangerous to think that people will forego
their cars
Biodiversity within
gardens/streetscape/public open space
and preservation of these spaces
Maximum 3 storeys along Unley Road and
5 storeys along Greenhill Road critical to
preserve character and prevent loss of
light and privacy and compromising solar
technology
Noted
Supporting mixed use zoning eg. along
main roads and home businesses
Emphasis on re-orientating car parking
away from street frontages and
amalgamating with adjacent sites rather
than numbers of car parks
Opportunities for more landscaping in
streetscapes and outdoor meeting places
to create walkable and connected
community within proposed Unley District
Centre Vitalisation DPA.
Targeted areas to have less ground space
but opportunities for green roofs and living
walls
The number of storeys along Unley Road
and Greenhill Road based on population
targets of 30 Year Plan. Podium and tower
setbacks along Unley Road and front and
side setbacks on Greenhill Road to reflect
character and views from streetscape
Building envelopes established to
minimise negative impacts to surrounding
20
Submissions received from: Summary of comments Proposed Development Plan response
development
Anne Wharton Commend work on waste/recycling issues
but overall disappointed in the ‘Greening
Section’ of Community Plan (eg food
security)
Noted for Community Plan
Urban area greening and food security is
supported by new ‘green roof/walls’ policy
within higher density zones, including Main
Road Corridors Mixed Use and Residential
Vitalisation DPA and Residential Character
and Growth Areas and General Policy
Review DPA
Tom Retaining character of City
Level of proposed development along
Unley Road and other transit corridors is
excessive and will detract from the
character. Require more modest response.
The number of storeys along Unley Road
and Greenhill Road based on population
targets of 30 Year Plan. Podium and tower
setbacks along Unley Road and front and
side setbacks on Greenhill Road to reflect
character when viewed from streetscape
Building envelopes established to
minimise negative impacts to surrounding
development
KJB Increased population and multiuse
development in conflict with the vision
statement for the City of Unley regarding
‘quality lifestyle choices’ and ‘vibrant
community spirit’
Loss of character with proposed heights
along major roads too high and would
create spaces where people would not
want to live and relax
Proposed areas to offer different lifestyle
experiences than other areas of the City
and responds to demographic changes
The number of storeys along Unley Road
and Greenhill Road based on population
targets of 30 Year Plan. Podium and tower
setbacks along Unley Road and front and
side setbacks on Greenhill Road to reflect
existing character when viewed from
streetscape
21
Submissions received from: Summary of comments Proposed Development Plan response
Opportunities for shopping, working and
living to be brought together and outdoor
meeting places to create a walkable and
connected community
Presiding Member of Unley Business and
Economic Development Committee
Acknowledge and support the DPA
Program and assigned priority
Requests Council to continue to devote
appropriate resources to successfully
implement the program
Noted
Noted
22
Other public engagement activities
Please provide details about any other communications and consultation activities undertaken in relation to the SDR preparation.
Communication options
1. Public notices in local or state-wide newspapers, newsletters, etc Notices posted in The Advertiser and the Easter Courier Messenger
2. Community information brochure ‘The City of Unley Draft Community Plan 2033, A Community of Possibilities’
information brochure
3. Letter-box drops Direct mail out to residents, businesses and property owners
4. Web site ‘Have Your Say’ on Unley website
5. Telephone access line n/a
6. Displays in public places Libraries, Shopping Centres
7. Notices in public places In accordance with the Options below
Consultation options
1. Meetings with elected members and staff Staff and elected member workshops
2. Council Advisory Committees n/a
3. Surveys through interviews/self-completion Face-to-face interviews in shopping centres, sporting events and the Farmers Market,
social media, online surveys
4. Staffed displays Face-to-face interviews in shopping centres, sporting events and the Farmers Market
5. Community forums and meetings Unley Town Hall ‘The Shebang’ drop in event
6. Other Focus group meetings, school and aged care facility workshops,
23
Consultation with state government and other bodies
Please indicate which state government departments, agencies and other relevant bodies were consulted during the drafting of the SDR and the results of that
consultation.
Department/agency consulted Summary of comments Proposed Development Plan response
Auditor-General’s Department
Defence SA
Department for Communities and Social Inclusion
Department for Education and Child Development
Department for Health and Ageing
Department for Manufacturing, Innovation, Trade,
Resources and Energy
Department for Environment, Water and Natural
Resources
Strengthen the short term priority for BDP
Conversion of Development Plan
Reference to the Adelaide and Mt Lofty
Ranges Regional NRM Plan and their 20
year targets
Proposed ‘ground water allocation plan’ for
the relevant area
Encouraging local indigenous plant
species in all development
Based on resourcing the high level of
existing and proposed priority DPA’s to
accommodate required and strategic
growth from the 30 Year Plan for Greater
Adelaide 2010, the BDP DPA has received
a priority level behind the current program
Noted for the Community Plan 2033
Await findings prior to considering
incorporation into Development Plan
Proposed within Residential Character and
Growth Areas and General Policy Review
DPA under ‘Landscaping’ in Council Wide
Section
24
Department/agency consulted Summary of comments Proposed Development Plan response
Recognition of link between healthy and
active community and open space
Environmentally sustainable design and
‘green infrastructure’
Large trees need to be associated with
regulated trees to offer protection
Connectivity between green and blue
(water) spaces
Not sure how ‘number of planning
approvals’ will provide a good indicator of
Water Sensitive Urban Design
Commend work on heritage policy and
need to minimise demolition of heritage
buildings not covered under existing
listings
Climate Change Adaptation Framework for
South Australia to be included as a useful
indicator under ‘Greening’
Unclear whether usage rates if
gas/electricity/wind/solar (pg 20) is through
purchase or deployment of non-fossil fuel
technology
Healthy living objective proposed within
Residential Character and Growth Areas
and General Policy Review DPA under
‘Residential Development’ in Council Wide
Section
Proposed within Main Road Corridors
Mixed Use and Residential Vitalisation and
Residential Character and Growth Areas
and General Policy Review DPA in Council
Wide Section
A DPA is required to review and update
the list of designated significant trees
Linear green spaces are developed
outside of the Development Plan and
linked to Council’s Pedestrian and Bicycle
Plan
Agree and noted.
Covered under recent Residential Historic
Conservation and Streetscape Character
Areas Pilot DPA (3 December 2009)
Noted for the Community Plan 2033
Noted for the Community Plan 2033
Department of Further Education, Employment,
Science and Technology
25
Department/agency consulted Summary of comments Proposed Development Plan response
Department of Justice
Department of Planning, Transport and
Infrastructure
Department of Primary Industries and Regions
Environment Protection Authority
Renewal SA
Department of the Premier and Cabinet
Department of Treasury and Finance
SA Power Networks
Electranet Pty Ltd
SA Water
South East Australia Gas Pty Ltd
Epic Energy
Adelaide Airport Limited
Adelaide and Mount Lofty Ranges NRM
26
5. Documents consulted
Councils are invited to indicate which documents they reviewed or referred to while preparing the SDR.
Documents consulted
South Australian’s Strategic Plan 2011 – http://saplan.org.au/
The Planning Strategy (The 30-Year Plan for Greater Adelaide) – http://www.sa.gov.au/planning/strategy
http://www.dplg.sa.gov.au/plan4adelaide/
Unley (City) Development Plan (consolidated 26 July 2012)
Draft Community Plan 2033
27
6. Documents provided
Please list and attach (or provide a web link to) any documents prepared during the SDR process, such as background papers, investigation reports, structure
plans, public engagement documents and GIS layers.
Documents provided
Public online engagement through www.yoursay.unley.sa.gov.au
Draft Community Plan 2033
Community of Possibilities Summary of Ideas
Community Of Possibilities Executive Summary