dhbw mannheim – study visit 21 st july 2011 cambridge technology cluster robert jonesprogramme...
TRANSCRIPT
DHBW Mannheim – Study Visit
21st July 2011
Cambridge Technology Cluster
Robert Jones Programme Leader, Executive MBA Lecturer in Entrepreneurship & Innovation
http://cambridgemba.wordpress.comhttp://cambridgearea.wordpress.com
Cambridge is an economic “hot-spot” – based on high-tech
We have a famous business area on our door step:-
Silicon Fen (Cambridge)
Copied from:-
Silicon Valley (California)
The Cambridge Phenomenon
Cambridge Phenomenon Conference 2010
http://vimeo.com/15767187
Cambridge Science Park
What is a science park?
What is necessary for a science park?
Cambridge Science Park
100-plus hi-tech firms
5,000 personnel
small start-ups
spin-outs
subsidiaries of multinational corporations.
There are now 60+ university / business parks in the UK
1970s slow progress, 25 firms
1980s cluster forming, social centre, VC, spin-outs
1990s 1200 firms, 35,000 employees, incubators
2000s to present dayIPOs, biotech, mix of types incl MNCs, life sciences, photonics, nanotechnology and materials science
Cambridge Science Park
St John’s Innovation Centrehttp://www.stjohns.co.uk/
Rent-Address 3 Star Service£7 + VAT per week
Cambridge Cluster
What is a cluster?
What are the conditions that influence a cluster to start and then grow?
Clusters
Porter, M “Competitive Advantage of Nations” (1990)
“Clusters and the New Economics of Competition” (1998) “Geographic concentrations of interconnected companies in a particular field”
Specialist firms tend to “cluster” or co-locate.
Alfred Marshall (1890)
The Cambridge PhenomenonIn 1985 SQW published a study into Cambridge’s success.
http://www.sqw.co.uk/
The Cambridge Phenomenon Revisited (SQW, 2000)
Examined Cambridge's high tech cluster, how it originally evolved, and subsequently developed over a fifteen year period; the causes and barriers to growth in firms and the links to the research communities. It also contains a review of entrepreneurial attitudes and intent amongst a range of populations, including schoolchildren, university students and the academic faculty.
Examples of Cambridge technology
Sinclair computers
Acorn computers
ARM plc
Plastic Logic
Autonomy plc
CSR Cambridge Silicon Radio
Marshall Group of companies
Abcam plc – antibodies online
Key factors that encourage clustering are:http://www.dti.gov.uk/CB/biotechclusters/chapt03.pdf
Greater CambridgePartnership 2009
But most of these firms are very small
40% of firms are micro & employ 1-5 people.
20% of firms are micro & employ 6-10 people
Only about 2.5% of firms employ more than 200 people
Cambridge high tech firms are based on:-
Innovation
Design“Know-how”Intellectual property Patents
= High value-added
Exploitation by licensing to overseas producerse.g. ARM plc
Do we see the emergence of the New economy?
Manufacturing - - -
Service + + +
Knowledge +
What next ? ?
Hermann Hauser
http://www.amadeuscapital.com/
Co-founder with Chris Curry of …..
Continuing growth of high-tech:-e.g. West Cambridge development
More research sites:-Addenbrookes pharma & medicalHinxton human genomeBabraham biotechLandbeach research parkAbington research park
BUT ……. Some key problems
Venture capital - lack of “seed” capitalSkills shortages - recruitment problemsHousing - very high pricesLack of building land - “green belt” policiesTransport - road congestionPlanning constraints
Lack of seed capital is a big problem
The Cambridge Cluster - the Way Ahead (2006)
Report produced for GCP by W J Herriot, T Minshall & A Smeets of St John’s Innovation Centre Ltd on behalf of the Cambridge Technopole
Limits to growth - what can we do?
The Cambridge Cluster - the Way Ahead (2006)Explains the size and characteristics of the cluster – the context and the role of the University of Cambridge.
Reviews the concerns that Cambridge has not created any really substantial businesses – no “big gorillas”
Analyses the importance of finance, particularly Venture Capital Funding, in the growth of the Cluster.
Reviews the specific Tym recommendations on business support
Examines how we might be more proactive in attracting business to the sub region Takes into account the findings of the SQW Report to position the Technopole and Enterprise Hubs in a regional context
WarningWalter Herriot quotes:-
Michael Best in the Massachusetts Technology Road Map and Strategic Alliances Study “Choosing to Lead: The Race for National R&L Leadership and New Economy Jobs” (2004).1 “We need to collaborate more effectively and develop a technology roadmaps that looks five or ten years down the line. Without a road map and an economic development strategy, we run the risks of turning into Cambridge, England: we’ll have isolated clusters of the very best University research and a number of small R&D firms but not the downstream production, service and support jobs that make a vibrant economy. We’ll create all the new ideas but others will get too much of the benefit”.
L I B R A R Y H O U S E
Looking Inwards, Reaching OutwardsThe Cambridge Cluster Report – 2007
What can we do? 5
Silicon Valley comes to Cambridge
November 2010
http://www.svc2c.com/