diabond

31
Diabond 2000, Verona 25/26 September Key Factors in the Performance of Sintered Diamond Tools for Stone Sawing L. Risso, M. Pareto, M. Capurro*, L. Gaggero § Centro Sviluppo Materiali Corso Perrone 24/a I-16152 Genova Italy *DEUIM, University of Genoa P.zale Kennedy, Fiera del Mare, Pad. D I-16127 Genova Italy § DIPTERIS, University of Genoa Corso Europa 26 I-16132 Genova

Upload: luca-risso

Post on 12-May-2015

958 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Key factors in the performace of diamond tools

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Diabond

Diabond 2000, Verona 25/26 September

Key Factors in the Performance of Sintered Diamond Tools for Stone Sawing

L. Risso, M. Pareto, M. Capurro*, L. Gaggero§

Centro Sviluppo MaterialiCorso Perrone 24/aI-16152 GenovaItaly

*DEUIM, University of GenoaP.zale Kennedy, Fiera del Mare, Pad. DI-16127 GenovaItaly

§DIPTERIS, University of GenoaCorso Europa 26I-16132 Genova

Page 2: Diabond

Diabond 2000, Verona 25/26 September

STONE

DIAMOND ALLOY

•COMPOSITION

•PETROGRAPHY

•MECHANICAL PROPERTIES

•COMPOSITION

•MICRO-STRUCTURE

•MECHANICALPROPERTIES

•FRIABILITY

•COMPRESSIVESTRENGTH

•STATISTICS

•GANULOMETRYANDMORPHOLOGY

•COLOUR

•INCLUSIONS

•THERMALSTABILITY

•Sawability •Abrasivity

•Retention

•Concentration

PERFORMANCE

Page 3: Diabond

Diabond 2000, Verona 25/26 September

NF

T

PP

NIT

ln

..

Toughness indexToughness index

It is conventionally assumed that N is the number of cycles such that PNF= 0.5PT

Page 4: Diabond

Diabond 2000, Verona 25/26 September

(*) average value of dispersed results

Measure of TI and TTI for Measure of TI and TTI for different materialsdifferent materials

Page 5: Diabond

Diabond 2000, Verona 25/26 September

Crushed grain distribution (mesh)Crushed grain distribution (mesh)

Page 6: Diabond

Diabond 2000, Verona 25/26 September

Friabilty of Diamond Mixtures

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

110

120

130

140

150

160

0 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8 0,9 1

Fraction

F.I.

of

the

Mix

ture

Fi=10; Fj=20

Fi=10; Fj=30

Fi=10; Fj=40

Fi=10; Fj=50

Fi=10; Fj=60

Fi=10; Fj=70

Fi=10; Fj=80

Fi=10; Fj=90

Fi=10; Fj=100

Fi=10; Fj=110

Fi=10; Fj=120

Fi=10; Fj=130

Fi=10; Fj=140

Fi=10; Fj=150

5.0)5.0()5.0()()( Fj

F

Fi

F

P

Pj

P

Pi

Page 7: Diabond

Diabond 2000, Verona 25/26 September

Geometrical parameters of the Geometrical parameters of the modelmodel

rr

33

Page 8: Diabond

Diabond 2000, Verona 25/26 September

Convergence of Mean Stress and Standard Deviation (SDB 1085)

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

Number of Data

Me

an

Va

lue

s (

MP

a)

Average of MeanStress

Average ofStand. Dev.

Page 9: Diabond

Diabond 2000, Verona 25/26 September

)(1)( cNf eP

Weibull statisticsWeibull statistics

Where Nc is the mean number of defects responsible for fracture at a stresses

dVnNEV

c )()(

Page 10: Diabond

Diabond 2000, Verona 25/26 September

n() at different Weibull modulus value

0

0,2

0,4

0,6

0,8

1

0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1

n(

)V0

m=0

m=

100

m

Vn

00

1)(

Weibull statisticsWeibull statistics

Page 11: Diabond

Diabond 2000, Verona 25/26 September

Weibull statisticsWeibull statistics

With the hypothesis of uniform defects distribution ((V)) we obtain:

mE

V

V

f eP

00)(1

and therefore

)ln(ln)(1

1lnln

00

mV

V

P mE

f

Page 12: Diabond

Diabond 2000, Verona 25/26 September

Weibull statisticsWeibull statistics

F )(fP

i1ni

n is the number of tests and 1 ii

)ln(

)(1

1lnln

fP

m1

m2

m3

m1=m2>m3

Page 13: Diabond

Diabond 2000, Verona 25/26 September

Wibull Plot on SDB 30/40

y = 1,7718x - 11,842

y = 3,3019x - 23,364

y = 4,1235x - 29,762

y = 3,5792x - 25,24y = 2,4914x - 17,276

-4

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

4,5 5 5,5 6 6,5 7 7,5 8

Ln()

Ln

(Ln

(1/(

1-p

f)))

1055

1075

1100

1085

1065

Lineare(1055)Lineare(1075)Lineare(1100)Lineare(1085)Lineare(1065)

Weibull statisticsWeibull statistics

Page 14: Diabond

Diabond 2000, Verona 25/26 September

Compression DataCompression Data

Hard Metal Anvils

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

1100

1200

1300

1400

1055 1065 1075 1085 1100

Diamond class (30/40 mesh)

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

4500

5000

5500

6000

Mean Strength (N)

Mean Stress (MPa)

Mean Strength on Section (MPa)

Log. (Mean Strength on Section (MPa))

Log. (Mean Strength (N))

Log. (Mean Stress (MPa))

Page 15: Diabond

Diabond 2000, Verona 25/26 September

Weibull Mudulus DistributionWeibull Mudulus Distribution

Hard Metal Anvils

0

0,5

1

1,5

2

2,5

3

3,5

4

4,5

1055 1065 1075 1085 1100

Diamond class (30/40 mesh)

We

ibu

ll M

od

ulu

s

0

0,5

1

1,5

2

2,5

3

3,5

4

4,5

Weibull Modula for Stress

Weibull Modula for Strength on Section

Potenza (Weibull Modula for Strength on Section)

Potenza (Weibull Modula for Stress)

Page 16: Diabond

Diabond 2000, Verona 25/26 September

Effect of Anvil MaterialEffect of Anvil Material

Page 17: Diabond

Diabond 2000, Verona 25/26 September

A

DiamEq4

..

)(PMaxMaxFeret

)(PMinMinFeret

13590450

4

PPPP

AMeanChord

MinFeret

MaxFeretElongation

2)(

4

Perimeter

AyCircularit

P

Geometrical ParametersGeometrical Parameters

A

Page 18: Diabond

Diabond 2000, Verona 25/26 September

Different inclusion morphology in Different inclusion morphology in SDA (B) and SDB (A) diamondsSDA (B) and SDB (A) diamonds

Page 19: Diabond

Diabond 2000, Verona 25/26 September

<100> direction

<111> direction

(100) planes

Typical inclusion distribution in a Typical inclusion distribution in a SDA family diamondSDA family diamond

Page 20: Diabond

Diabond 2000, Verona 25/26 September

Thermal Stability: Combustion Thermal Stability: Combustion TemperatureTemperature

Page 21: Diabond

Diabond 2000, Verona 25/26 September

Hardness of Different Stones With Hardness of Different Stones With Similar CompositionSimilar Composition

Quartz dimension: 0.1-0.2 mm Quartz dimension: 0.2-1.5 mm

Page 22: Diabond

Diabond 2000, Verona 25/26 September

White Finale White Marble (Carrara)

2.5 mm

Page 23: Diabond

Diabond 2000, Verona 25/26 September

Cobalt PropertiesCobalt Properties

Effect of ageing (2 h) on hardness Effect of alloying (1 at.%) on transition

Page 24: Diabond

Diabond 2000, Verona 25/26 September

Mixture PropertiesMixture Properties

Page 25: Diabond

Diabond 2000, Verona 25/26 September

Hardness of a Mixture Co/WC

300

320

340

360

380

400

420

440

0 0,05 0,1 0,15 0,2 0,25 0,3

WC Volume Fraction

HV

30 WC >> 1 micron

WC = 1 micron

WC << i micron

Mixture PropertiesMixture Properties

Co

Co

WC

WC

CoWC H

V

H

V

H

/

1

Page 26: Diabond

Diabond 2000, Verona 25/26 September

Cu/Sn Phase diagramCu/Sn Phase diagram

Page 27: Diabond

Diabond 2000, Verona 25/26 September

Abrasivity Measurement Abrasivity Measurement

Page 28: Diabond

Diabond 2000, Verona 25/26 September

Loss of volumeMarble at 500 rpm

0

0,005

0,01

0,015

0,02

0,025

0,03

0,035

0,04

0,045

0,05

0 20000 40000 60000 80000 100000 120000 140000

meters

Vo

lum

e L

ost

(cm

3 )

Bronze

Bronze+Cobalt

Bronze+cobalt+WCCobalt A

Cobalt B

Cobalt+WC

Abrasivity Measurement Abrasivity Measurement

Page 29: Diabond

Diabond 2000, Verona 25/26 September

Sawability Measurement Sawability Measurement

Page 30: Diabond

Diabond 2000, Verona 25/26 September

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

0 8 16 24 32 40

Time [h]

We

ar

[m

]

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

To

rqu

e [

Nm

]

Wear B3M

Wear B4M

Torqe B3M

Torque B4M

Sawability Measurement Sawability Measurement

Page 31: Diabond

Diabond 2000, Verona 25/26 September

We want to acknowledge •De Beers Industrial Diamond Division for providing the samples

•Italian Ministry for University and Research for partial funding

AcknowledgementsAcknowledgements