differentiation in searching behavior for carcasses based on flight height differences in carrion...
TRANSCRIPT
Differentiation in Searching Behavior for CarcassesBased on Flight Height Differences in Carrion Beetles(Coleoptera: Silphidae)
Hiroshi Ikeda & Satoshi Shimano & Akira Yamagami
Revised: 17 September 2010 /Accepted: 13 October 2010 /Published online: 4 November 2010# Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010
Abstract Flight ability allows insects to search for food and locate oviposition sitesacross a wide range of environments and, thus, allows insects to locate scarce andpatchy resources such as carcasses. We examined differentiation in searching forcarcasses, based on capture height differences in carrion beetles, and found thatcapture height differed among species. For Nicrophorus quadripunctatus andOiceoptoma nigropunctatum, the height of abundance peaks differed among sitesand was related to species composition at each site, indicating that shifts in flightheight can occur plastically, whereas those for Nicrophorus maculifrons andNicrophorus investigator did not differ among sites, indicating that the flightheights of these species are largely genetically determined. Thus, the presentdifferentiation in capture height is primarily determined by current plastic shifts andon some genetic basis.
Keywords Necrophagous .Nicrophorus . plasticity
Introduction
Flight allows insects to disperse over long distances and to search for food, partnersand oviposition sites across a wide range of environments. Previous studies have
J Insect Behav (2011) 24:167–174DOI 10.1007/s10905-010-9245-5
H. Ikeda (*)Department of Forest Entomology, Forestry and Forest Products Research Institute,1 Matsunosato Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8687, Japane-mail: [email protected]
S. ShimanoEnvironmental Education Center, Miyagi University of Education, 149 Aramaki, Aoba,Sendai city, Miyagi 980-0845, Japan
A. YamagamiLiberal Arts Education Center, Tokai University, 1117 Kitakaname, Hiratsuka city,Kanagawa 259-1292, Japan
demonstrated flight height differentiation related to food resources and ovipositionhabitats in butterflies (Devries and Walla 2001; Fermon et al. 2005), moths (Intachatand Holloway 2000; Brehm 2007) and wasps (Harrison 2003).
In carrion beetles (Coleoptera: Silphidae), most species use vertebrate carcasses asfood and breeding resources (e.g. Leschen 1993; Ratcliffe 1996; Eggert and Müller1997; Ikeda et al. 2007). Vertebrate carcasses are a scarce and patchy resource; thus,insects must search for carcasses on the fly. Ohkawara (1991) and Nagano andSuzuki (2003) elucidated the differentiation of searching behavior for carcasses viaflight height differences among sympatric species by examining capture heightdifferences. Ohkawara (1991) inferred that species flying at high heights broadlysearch for carcasses across a wide range, whereas species flying at low heights morefinely search across a narrow range.
Although Ohkawara (1991) and Nagano and Suzuki (2003) documented thedifferentiation through behavioral differences in Silphidae, their studies wereconducted at only one or two study sites; therefore, they were unable to determinewhether the capture height of each species was fixed or whether it can changeplastically. Plasticity can affect population dynamics by altering the interactionsbetween organisms and their abiotic and biotic environments and is thus importantfor stabilizing food webs (Miner et al. 2005). Fermon et al. (2005) demonstrated thatdifferences in the species richness of butterflies between natural and disturbed forestswere related to behavioral changes caused by variation in food resources andoviposition habitat. In Silphidae, capture height can change plastically, which maybe related to silphid species diversity. To address this issue, comparisons of captureheights must be made among sites that differ in species composition.
In this study, we examined the differentiation of capture height among sympatricsilphid species. Subsequently, we compared the differences in capture height of eachspecies among sites to reveal whether flight height can change plastically due tovariation in species composition.
Material and Methods
Our study was conducted at seven forest sites (Omotefuji: 35.37°N, 138.81°E, beechforest; Kiso: 35.83°N, 137.86°E, riparian deciduous forest; Sugadaira: 36.51°N,138.36°E, larch plantation forest; Kakuma: 36.45°N, 138.36°E, riparian forest;Inabu: 35.20°N, 137.57°E, cedar plantation forest; Baraki: 36.55°N, 138.47°E,deciduous forest; Madarao: 36.83°N, 138.30°E, deciduous forest) in Japan. Quercuscrispula dominated the deciduous forests of Kiso and Madarao, and Q. crispula andBetula platyphylla dominated those of Baraki. Sampling was conducted in July 1995at Omotefuji, Kiso, and Sugadaira; in July 1990 at Kakuma; in August 1995 atInabu; from July to August 1994 and 1995 at Baraki; and in August 1992 atMadarao. For Baraki, data were pooled for 1994 and 1995 because the patterns didnot differ between years. Beetles were collected using traps constructed of cans withchicken meat as bait (Fig. 1). Traps were set at five different heights (0, 0.5, 1.5, 4,and 8 m above the ground) for 3–6 days, and 20 replicates of these five-trap setswere hung or set on the ground at each site (100 traps/site). For traps at some sites,the internal cans were placed upside down to prevent damage by birds and
168 J Insect Behav (2011) 24:167–174
mammals. Carrion beetles are attracted by bait, so not all the collected individualsflew at their capture height. However, we used trap sets of five different heights inthe same place, with the only difference within a trap set being height. Thus, most ofthe individual insects flying around the trap height were expected to be trapped. Forthis reason, the data from our study represent the distribution pattern along height tosome degree.
We conducted two-sample Kolmogorov–Smirnov tests to examine differentiationof capture height among silphid species at each site. We used only those species withmore than five individuals at each site for analysis. We also performed two-sampleKolmogorov–Smirnov tests to examine the differences in capture height among sitesfor each species. For this analysis, we used only those species for which more thanfive individuals were collected at two or more sites.
Results
We collected 1,479 individuals from nine silphid species (Table 1). Species richnessvaried from two to eight species among sites. Capture height was differentiatedamong species in five natural and plantation forest sites (Omotefuji, Kiso, Sugadaira,Kakuma, and Madarao; Tables 1 and 2). Nicrophorus quadripunctatus, Nicrophorusmaculifrons, Nicrophorus investigator, and Oiceoptoma nigropunctatum wereprimarily collected at 0–4, 8, 4–8, and 0–4 m, respectively. Calosilpha brunnicolliswas found with equal proportion at all heights except 0 m. We were unable todetermine the patterns of capture heights for Nicrophorus concolor, Ptomascopusmorio, Dendroxena sexcarinata, and Necrodes littoralis due to small sample sizes.At most sites, capture heights differed significantly between those species searchingprimarily at low heights (N. quadripunctatus and O. nigropunctatum) and thosesearching primarily at high heights (N. maculifrons and N. investigator; Table 2).Furthermore, capture heights significantly differed at most sites between the twospecies searching at low heights (N. quadripunctatus and O. nigropunctatum),whereas capture heights did not differ between the two species primarily searching athigh heights (N. maculifrons and N. investigator).
Fig. 1 Conceptual diagram ofone set of five traps
J Insect Behav (2011) 24:167–174 169169
Tab
le1
Vertical
distributio
nof
silphidbeetlesat
each
studysite.The
ratio
ateach
height
andthetotalnumberin
each
speciesareshow
n
Height(m
)Omotefuji
Kiso
Sugadaira
Kakum
a
Nq
Nm
Ni
Nc
Nq
Nm
Ni
Nc
On
Nq
Nm
Ni
On
Nq
Nm
Ni
Nc
Pm
8.0
0.21
0.38
0.20
0.00
0.18
0.25
0.33
0.50
0.18
0.00
0.22
0.33
0.00
0.10
0.45
0.48
0.33
0.00
4.0
0.16
0.14
0.20
0.00
0.16
0.00
0.67
0.00
0.07
0.00
0.33
0.00
0.00
0.18
0.23
0.26
0.00
0.00
1.5
0.27
0.17
0.40
0.00
0.23
0.50
0.00
0.25
0.46
0.32
0.44
0.50
0.00
0.17
0.23
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.5
0.23
0.18
0.20
0.00
0.23
0.25
0.00
0.00
0.18
0.32
0.00
0.17
0.00
0.15
0.09
0.04
0.67
0.50
0.0
0.12
0.13
0.00
1.00
0.20
0.00
0.00
0.25
0.10
0.36
0.00
0.00
1.00
0.39
0.00
0.11
0.00
0.50
Total
317
785
344
49
414
753
96
1410
422
273
2
Heigh
t(m
)Kakum
aInabu
Baraki
Madarao
On
Cb
Ds
Nq
Nc
Nq
Nm
Ni
Nc
On
Cb
Nl
Nq
Nm
Ni
Nc
On
8.0
0.11
0.25
0.00
0.04
0.60
0.00
0.29
0.33
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.28
0.00
0.00
0.00
4.0
0.30
0.25
0.00
0.31
0.00
0.15
0.00
0.33
0.00
0.04
0.50
0.00
0.07
0.39
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.5
0.24
0.25
0.00
0.45
0.20
0.24
0.57
0.00
0.67
0.19
0.25
0.00
0.26
0.17
1.00
1.00
0.00
0.5
0.20
0.25
0.00
0.21
0.00
0.22
0.14
0.33
0.33
0.22
0.25
0.00
0.28
0.09
0.00
0.00
0.11
0.0
0.15
0.00
1.00
0.00
0.20
0.39
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.56
0.00
1.00
0.36
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.89
Total
190
161
150
567
73
327
41
9646
21
9
NqNicroph
orus
quad
ripunctatus,Nm
N.m
aculifron
s,NiN
.investig
ator,N
cN.con
color,OnOiceoptom
anigrop
unctatum
,Pm
Ptomascopusmorio,C
bCalosilp
habrunnicollis,
DsDendroxenasexcarinata,
NlNecrodeslittoralis
170 J Insect Behav (2011) 24:167–174
Four species (N. quadripunctatus, N. maculifrons, N. investigator, and O.nigropunctatum) were used to analyze differences in capture height among sites.Capture heights differed among sites for N. quadripunctatus and O. nigropunctatumbut not for N. maculifrons and N. investigator (Table 3). For N. quadripunctatus,most comparisons between sites were significant. Although N. quadripunctatus wascollected primarily at relatively low heights, the height of peak abundance variedamong sites from 0 m at Kakuma and Madarao to 0.5–1.5 m at Omotefuji and1.5–4 m at Inabu. For O. nigropunctatum, most comparisons between sites were alsosignificant. This species was collected primarily at relatively low heights, but theheight of peak abundance ranged from 0 m at Sugadaira and Madarao to 1.5 m atKiso and 4 m at Kakuma.
Discussion
Our study demonstrated that the heights of peak abundance varied significantlyamong sites for N. quadripunctatus and O. nigropunctatum. Such differences werenot related to forest type. Our results indicated that shifts in capture height can occurplastically. The distribution of capture heights for N. quadripunctatus and O.nigropunctatum appeared to be related to one another. The height of peak abundanceof N. quadripunctatus was 0.5 m at sites in which O. nigropunctatum was absent(Omotefuji and Inabu), whereas it was 0 m or unclear, and the total abundance of N.quadripunctatus was relatively low at sites with relatively high abundances of O.nigropunctatum (Kiso and Kakuma). Considering that N. quadripunctatus and O.nigropunctatum both exhibited high densities at relatively low heights, interspecificinteractions between the two species may induce a shift in capture height atrelatively low heights.
Although we observed shifts in capture height for N. quadripunctatus and O.nigropunctatum, these two species were primarily collected at low heights.Furthermore, plastic shifts in capture height did not appear to occur in N.maculifrons and N. investigator. Thus, a portion of the current differentiation ofcapture height among silphid species was likely genetically determined.
Table 2 Differentiation of flight height among species within each site
Nm Ni Nc On Cb
Nq O, S, Ka, B, M O, Ki, S, Ka I Ki, S, Ka, B, M Ka
Nm O, S, Ka – S, Ka, B, M Ka
Ni – Ki, S, Ka Ka
Nc – –
On Ka
Sites for which flight heights significantly varied among species are indicated by italics (P<0.05) or bold italics(P<0.01). O Omotefuji; Ki Kiso; S Sugadaira; Ka Kakuma; I Inabu; B Baraki; M Madarao. Abbreviations for speciesnames are as shown in Table 1
J Insect Behav (2011) 24:167–174 171171
Ikeda et al. (2006) demonstrated a relationship between body size and food andbreeding resources among Nicrophorus species. In addition, Ohkawara (1991) notedthat larger species tend to fly at a higher stratum than smaller species. Therefore,differences in body size due to interspecific differences in food and breeding resourceuse may be related to interspecific differences in capture height. In this study, we did notexamine the relationship between body size and capture height because of small samplesizes for large Nicrophorus species as well as the absence of small-sized species.Further studies should more thoroughly investigate these relationships.
Most previous studies of carrion beetle communities use pitfall traps on theground (Katakura and Fukuda 1975; Katakura et al. 1986; Katakura and Ueno 1985;
Table 3 Results of two-sample Kolmogorov–Smirnov tests among sites for species searching primarily atlow heights (a: N. quadripunctatus, b: O. nigropunctatum) and for species primarily searching at highheights (c: N. maculifrons, d: N. investigator)
Kiso Sugadaira Kakuma Inabu Baraki Madarao
a
Omotefuji 0.08 0.37 0.27 0.17 0.27 0.29
Kiso 0.34 0.19 0.23 0.19 0.25
Sugadaira 0.28 0.47 0.15 0.09
Kakuma 0.39 0.13 0.19
Inabu 0.41 0.44
Baraki 0.06
b
Omotefuji – – – – – –
Kiso 0.90 0.15 – 0.50 0.79
Sugadaira 0.85 – 0.44 0.11
Kakuma – 0.43 0.74
Inabu – –
Baraki 0.33
c
Omotefuji – 0.31 0.22 – 0.24 0.16
Kiso – – – – –
Sugadaira 0.23 – 0.27 0.15
Kakuma – 0.40 0.17
Inabu – –
Baraki 0.39
d
Omotefuji 0.60 0.13 0.34 – – –
Kiso 0.67 0.26 – – –
Sugadaira 0.41 – – –
Kakuma – – –
Inabu – –
Baraki –
Significant results are indicated by italics (P<0.05) or bold italics (P<0.01)
172 J Insect Behav (2011) 24:167–174
Martin 1989; Ohkawara et al. 1998). However, we demonstrated that some speciesfly at high heights, whereas others fly at low heights. Therefore, sampling data frompitfall traps on the ground at forest sites may underestimate the population size ofcarrion beetle species that fly at high heights, such as N. maculifrons andN. investigator.
Although all carrion beetles examined in this study make use of vertebratecarcasses on the ground, the ability to search for carcasses above ground level wasdifferent among species and the flight height of some species shifted plastically,related to species composition. The difference in flight height may be related to otherflight behavioral patterns and the targeting carrion type. Further study will revealsuch differentiation related to flight height.
Acknowledgments This research was supported by a grant-in-aid from the Japan Society of Promotionof Sciences (No. 20579001).
References
Brehm G (2007) Contrasting patterns of vertical stratification in two moth families in a Costa Ricanlowland rain forest. Basic Appl Ecol 8:44–54
Devries PJ, Walla TR (2001) Species diversity and community structure in neotropical fruit-feedingbutterflies. Biol J Linn Soc 74:1–15
Eggert A-K, Müller JK (1997) Biparental and social evolution in burying beetles: lessons from the larder.In: Choe JC, Crespi BJ (eds) The evolution of social behavior in insects and arachnids. CambridgeUniversity Press, Cambridge, pp 216–236
Fermon H, Waltert M, Vane-Wright RI, Mühlenberg M (2005) Forest use and vertical stratificationin fruit-feeding butterflies of Sulawesi, Indonesia: impacts for conservation. Biodiv Conserv14:333–350
Harrison RD (2003) Fig wasp dispersal and the stability of a keystone plant resource in Borneo. Proc RSoc B 270:s76–s79
Ikeda H, Kubota K, Kagaya T, Abe T (2006) Niche differentiation of burying beetles (Coleoptera:Silphidae: Nicrophorinae) in carcass use in relation to body size: Estimation from stable isotopeanalysis. Appl Entomol Zool 41:561–564
Ikeda H, Kubota K, Kagaya T, Abe T (2007) Flight capabilities and feeding habits of silphine beetles: areflightless species really “carrion beetles”? Ecol Res 22:237–241
Intachat J, Holloway JD (2000) Is there stratification in diversity or preferred flight height of geometroidmoths in Malaysian lowland tropical forest? Biodiv Conserv 9:1417–1439
Katakura H, Fukuda H (1975) Faunal makeup of ground and carrion beetles in Kamiotoineppu, HokkaidoNakagawa Experiment Forest, Northern Japan, with some notes on related problems. Res BullHokkaido Univ For 32:75–92
Katakura H, Ueno R (1985) A preliminary study on the faunal make-up and spatio-temporal distributionof carrion beetles (Coleoptera: Silphidae) on the Ishikari coast, northern Japan. Jpn J Ecol 35:461–468(in Japanese)
Katakura H, Sonoda M, Yoshida N (1986) Carrion beetle (Coleoptera, Silphidae) fauna of HokkaidoUniversity Tomakomai Experiment Forest, northern Japan, with a note on the habitat preference of aGeotrupine species, Geotrupes laevistriatus (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae). Res Bull Coll Exp For43:43–56
Leschen RAB (1993) Evolutionary patterns of feeding in selected Staphylinoidea (Coleoptera): shiftsamong food textures. In: Schaefer CW, Leschen RAB (eds) Functional morphology of insect feeding.Entomological Society of America, Maryland, pp 59–104
Martin S (1989) Altitudinal distribution of burying beetles (Coleoptera, Silphidae) in the southern Alps ofJapan. Jpn J Entomol 57:876–879
Miner BG, Sultan SE, Morgan SG, Padilla DK, Relyea RA (2005) Ecological consequences of phenotypicplasticity. Trends Ecol Evol 20:685–692
J Insect Behav (2011) 24:167–174 173173
Nagano M, Suzuki S (2003) Spatio-temporal distribution and food-searching strategy differentiationsbetween two silphid beetles, Eusilpha japonica and E. brunnicollis (Coleoptera, Silphidae). Elytra31:199–208
Ohkawara K (1991) A note on height of flight in Nicrophorus carrion beetles. Res Bull Coll Exp For48:463–467
Ohkawara K, Suzuki S, Katakura H (1998) Competitive interaction and niche differentiation amongburying beetles (Silphidae, Nicrophorus) in Northern Japan. Entomol Sci 1:551–559
Ratcliffe BC (1996) The carrion beetles (Coleoptera: Silphidae) of Nebraska, Bulletin of the University ofNebraska State Museum Vol. 13. The University of Nebraska State Museum, Nebraska
174 J Insect Behav (2011) 24:167–174