district and charter evaluation plan feedback webinar november 17, 2014 lisa colón, educator...
TRANSCRIPT
District and Charter Evaluation Plan Feedback
WebinarNovember 17, 2014
Lisa Colón, Educator Effectiveness CoordinatorIdaho State Department of Education
District and Charter Evaluation Plan Feedback Webinar
• Objectives:– Identify common areas that teacher and
principal evaluation plans were documented as needing revision and the elements that are required.
– Review principal and teacher evaluation plan templates.
– Answer questions.
Evaluation Plan SectionsTeacher Evaluation PlanIDAPA 08.02.02.120• 120.01 Standards• 120.02 Professional Practice• 120.03 Student Achievement• 120.04 Participants• 120.05 Evaluation Policy –
Content• 120.06 Evaluation Policy –
Frequency of Evaluation• 120.07 Evaluation Policy –
Personnel Records• 120.08 Evaluation System
Approval
Principal Evaluation PlanIDAPA 08.02.02.121• 121.01 Standards• 121.02 Professional Practice• 121.03 Student Achievement• 121.04 Evaluation Policy –
Content• 121.05 Evaluation Policy –
Frequency of Evaluation• 121.06 Evaluation Policy –
Personnel Records• 121.07 Evaluation System
Approval
Needs Revision – Professional Practice
Teacher Evaluation PlanIDAPA 08.02.02.120.01 & 08.02.02.120.02• 67% based on multiple measures
of professional practice– Aligned to Charlotte Danielson’s
Framework for Teaching Second Edition (4 domains – 22 components)
– Two (2) documented observations with one completed by January 1st.
– Identifies/Describes process of including at least one of the following:• Parent/Guardian Input• Student Input• Portfolio
Principal EvaluationIDAPA 08.02.02.121.01 & 08.02.02.121.02• 67% based on multiple
measures of professional practice– Aligned to Idaho Standards for
Effective Principals (3 domains – 14 components)
– Identifies/Describes process of including at least one of the following:• Parent/Guardian Input• Teacher Input• Student Input• Portfolio
Needs Revision – Student Achievement
Teacher Evaluation PlanIDAPA 08.02.02.120.03• 33% based on multiple
measures of student achievement– Based on growth in student
achievement.– Include at least two
measures with one of the measures based on ISAT by Smarter Balanced.
– Identifies the other district determined measure.
Principal EvaluationIDAPA 08.02.02.121.03• 33% based on multiple
measures of student achievement– Based on growth in
student achievement.– Include at least two
measures with one of the measures based on ISAT by Smarter Balanced.
– Identifies the other district determined measure.
Other District Determined Student Achievement Measure Examples
• Student Learning Objectives (SLO’s)• Pre and Post Assessments• End of Course Assessments• District-adopted vendor
assessments
Questions?
• Any questions regarding:– 67% Professional Practice– 33% Student Achievement
• Next part of the webinar will cover evaluation policy and the evaluation plan-policy templates.
Needs Revision – Evaluation Policy
Teacher Evaluation Plan• IDAPA 08.02.02.120.05
Evaluation Policy – Content (all 15 areas)
• IDAPA 08.02.02.120.06 Evaluation Policy – Frequency of Evaluation
• IDAPA 08.02.02.120.07 Evaluation Policy – Personnel Records
Principal Evaluation• IDAPA 08.02.02.121.04
Evaluation Policy – Content (all 15 areas)
• IDAPA 08.02.02.121.05 Evaluation Policy – Frequency of Evaluation
• IDAPA 08.02.02.121.06 Evaluation Policy – Personnel Records
Evaluation Plan – Policy Templates
• Resource for districts – not a required format/form.
• Includes all areas as required by IDAPA Rule.
• Cannot be submitted as written:– Districts need to define the areas that
are to be planed or determined by the district.
Individualizing Evaluation Rating System
• Shall be based on 67% Professional Practice and 33% Student Achievement–Numerical Summative Rating–Matrix Summative RatingProfession
al Practice(67%)
Student Achieveme
nt(33%)
Summative Evaluation
Rating
Overall Summative RatingMatrix Example
Professional Practice - 67%Unsatisfactory = 1 Basic = 2 Proficient = 3 Distinguished = 4
Student Achievement - 33%
Unsatisfactory = 1 Unsatisfactory= 1.00
Unsatisfactory= 1.67
Basic= 2.34
Proficient= 3.01
Basic = 2 Unsatisfactory= 1.33
Basic= 2.00
Proficient= 2.67
Proficient= 3.34
Proficient = 3 Unsatisfactory= 1.66
Basic= 2.33
Proficient= 3.00
Distinguished= 3.67
Distinguised = 4 Unsatisfactory= 1.99
Proficient= 2.66
Proficient= 3.33
Distinguished= 4.00
Overall Summative Rating Scale3.50-4.00 = Distinguished
2.50-3.49 = Proficient
2.00-2.49 = Basic
1.00-1.99 = Unsatisfactory
District and Charter Evaluation Plan Feedback Webinar
• Common areas that teacher and principal evaluation plans were documented as needing revision:– Professional Practice– Student Achievement– Evaluation Policy
• Evaluation plan templates as resource for districts.
Questions?
• Any questions regarding:– 67% Professional Practice– 33% Student Achievement– Evaluation Policy– Evaluation Plan-Policy Templates