District and Charter Evaluation Plan Feedback
WebinarNovember 17, 2014
Lisa Colón, Educator Effectiveness CoordinatorIdaho State Department of Education
District and Charter Evaluation Plan Feedback Webinar
• Objectives:– Identify common areas that teacher and
principal evaluation plans were documented as needing revision and the elements that are required.
– Review principal and teacher evaluation plan templates.
– Answer questions.
Evaluation Plan SectionsTeacher Evaluation PlanIDAPA 08.02.02.120• 120.01 Standards• 120.02 Professional Practice• 120.03 Student Achievement• 120.04 Participants• 120.05 Evaluation Policy –
Content• 120.06 Evaluation Policy –
Frequency of Evaluation• 120.07 Evaluation Policy –
Personnel Records• 120.08 Evaluation System
Approval
Principal Evaluation PlanIDAPA 08.02.02.121• 121.01 Standards• 121.02 Professional Practice• 121.03 Student Achievement• 121.04 Evaluation Policy –
Content• 121.05 Evaluation Policy –
Frequency of Evaluation• 121.06 Evaluation Policy –
Personnel Records• 121.07 Evaluation System
Approval
Needs Revision Common Areas
• Professional Practice• Student Achievement• Evaluation Policy
Needs Revision – Professional Practice
Teacher Evaluation PlanIDAPA 08.02.02.120.01 & 08.02.02.120.02• 67% based on multiple measures
of professional practice– Aligned to Charlotte Danielson’s
Framework for Teaching Second Edition (4 domains – 22 components)
– Two (2) documented observations with one completed by January 1st.
– Identifies/Describes process of including at least one of the following:• Parent/Guardian Input• Student Input• Portfolio
Principal EvaluationIDAPA 08.02.02.121.01 & 08.02.02.121.02• 67% based on multiple
measures of professional practice– Aligned to Idaho Standards for
Effective Principals (3 domains – 14 components)
– Identifies/Describes process of including at least one of the following:• Parent/Guardian Input• Teacher Input• Student Input• Portfolio
Needs Revision – Student Achievement
Teacher Evaluation PlanIDAPA 08.02.02.120.03• 33% based on multiple
measures of student achievement– Based on growth in student
achievement.– Include at least two
measures with one of the measures based on ISAT by Smarter Balanced.
– Identifies the other district determined measure.
Principal EvaluationIDAPA 08.02.02.121.03• 33% based on multiple
measures of student achievement– Based on growth in
student achievement.– Include at least two
measures with one of the measures based on ISAT by Smarter Balanced.
– Identifies the other district determined measure.
Other District Determined Student Achievement Measure Examples
• Student Learning Objectives (SLO’s)• Pre and Post Assessments• End of Course Assessments• District-adopted vendor
assessments
Questions?
• Any questions regarding:– 67% Professional Practice– 33% Student Achievement
• Next part of the webinar will cover evaluation policy and the evaluation plan-policy templates.
Needs Revision – Evaluation Policy
Teacher Evaluation Plan• IDAPA 08.02.02.120.05
Evaluation Policy – Content (all 15 areas)
• IDAPA 08.02.02.120.06 Evaluation Policy – Frequency of Evaluation
• IDAPA 08.02.02.120.07 Evaluation Policy – Personnel Records
Principal Evaluation• IDAPA 08.02.02.121.04
Evaluation Policy – Content (all 15 areas)
• IDAPA 08.02.02.121.05 Evaluation Policy – Frequency of Evaluation
• IDAPA 08.02.02.121.06 Evaluation Policy – Personnel Records
Evaluation Plan – Policy Templates
• Resource for districts – not a required format/form.
• Includes all areas as required by IDAPA Rule.
• Cannot be submitted as written:– Districts need to define the areas that
are to be planed or determined by the district.
Individualizing Evaluation Rating System
• Shall be based on 67% Professional Practice and 33% Student Achievement–Numerical Summative Rating–Matrix Summative RatingProfession
al Practice(67%)
Student Achieveme
nt(33%)
Summative Evaluation
Rating
Overall Summative RatingMatrix Example
Professional Practice - 67%Unsatisfactory = 1 Basic = 2 Proficient = 3 Distinguished = 4
Student Achievement - 33%
Unsatisfactory = 1 Unsatisfactory= 1.00
Unsatisfactory= 1.67
Basic= 2.34
Proficient= 3.01
Basic = 2 Unsatisfactory= 1.33
Basic= 2.00
Proficient= 2.67
Proficient= 3.34
Proficient = 3 Unsatisfactory= 1.66
Basic= 2.33
Proficient= 3.00
Distinguished= 3.67
Distinguised = 4 Unsatisfactory= 1.99
Proficient= 2.66
Proficient= 3.33
Distinguished= 4.00
Overall Summative Rating Scale3.50-4.00 = Distinguished
2.50-3.49 = Proficient
2.00-2.49 = Basic
1.00-1.99 = Unsatisfactory
District and Charter Evaluation Plan Feedback Webinar
• Common areas that teacher and principal evaluation plans were documented as needing revision:– Professional Practice– Student Achievement– Evaluation Policy
• Evaluation plan templates as resource for districts.
Questions?
• Any questions regarding:– 67% Professional Practice– 33% Student Achievement– Evaluation Policy– Evaluation Plan-Policy Templates
