diversity update 2011 september 2011

Diversity Update 2011

September 2011

Equity Scorecard FrameworkAccess

Excellence

Institutional Receptivity

RetentionEquity in

Educational Outcomes

The Equity Scorecard was developed by Dr. Estela Mara Bensimon at the Center for Urban Education, University of Southern California (http://www.usc.edu/dept/education/CUE/).

Each of the four perspectives has an objective.

From this objective we can:-Measure baseline performance - Set an

improvement target

- Work towards equity in educational outcomes.

http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html

Demographic Variables for Analysis

This presentation is limited to variables for which we have quantitative information, including: Race/ethnicity Income level First-generation in college Gender Geographic diversity. Information is not systematically available for other groupsthat are important to inclusive excellence.


Components:• Enrollment

– Undergraduate– Graduate– Professional– School/College

• Pipeline• Financial Aid/Need-Based

Aid• Majors/Degrees

Access

Excellence


Retention

Access

Equity in Educational Outcomes


0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11

RevisedRace/Ethnic Categories

Southeast Asian Collection BeginsRace/Ethnicity Collection Begins

Minority Students, 14.5%

Targeted Minority Students, 9.9%

From 2002 to 2011 4.9 percentage

point increase in Minority Enrollment

3.7 percentage point increase in Targeted Minority Enrollment

Indicator 1: Percent Enrollment of MinorityUndergraduate Students

Targeted Minorities include African American, Native American, Hispanic/Latino/a, Southeast Asian (Cambodians, Laotians, Vietnamese, and Hmong). Minorities include targeted minorities as well as Other Asians and Native Hawaiians. International students are not counted for targeted minority collections.


2011 data is preliminary.

Race/Ethnic Categories: Students

Continued terminology from Plan 2008

Excludes all Asians, useful for national peer comparisons.

• Targeted Minorities include:» African American» Native American» Hispanic/Latino/a» Southeast Asian (Cambodians,

Laotians, Vietnamese, and Hmong)

• Minorities include:» Targeted Minority categories» Other Asians» Native Hawaiians

Students self-report their race/ethnicity at the time of application.http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html

International students are not counted in any of these collections, in keeping with state/federal guidelines.

Access: Enrollmenthttp://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html

Reporting Methodologies for Race/Ethnicity InformationThe relatively new ability to indicate multiple race/ethnic values results in a much richer picture of student diversity but data reporting is more complicated. To deal with these complexities, methodology options for data reporting have emerged . The method that is most appropriate depends on for what purpose the data will be used. The table below describes the features of each method and shows how the methods are similar and different from each other.

Reporting Feature Primary Federal Count All

Results in single count of students P PPrioritizes Hispanic/Latina(a) over other values PCreates new categories that are not reported by students themselves P

Displays race/ethnic values only for domestic (non international) students P P P

Displays ALL students who indicate a particularrace/ethnicity P

Prioritizes some race/ethnicities over others P PUsed in external data reporting and rankings P


Fall 2011 UW-Madison Students by Race/Ethnicity and Methodology

“Primary” Federal Count All

Hispanic/Latino(a) 1,698 1,735 1,735

Black or African American 1,219 1,033 1,315

American Indian or Alaska Native 399 136 418

Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 107 38 124

Asian 2,477 2,160 2,564

White 31,083 31,083 32,527

Two or more races --- 798 ---

Unknown 1,088 1,088 1,088

International 4,370 4,370 4,370

Total 42,441 42,441 44,141

Subsequent slides use “Primary” race/ethnic methodology

Indicator 2: Percent Enrollment of Targeted Minority Undergraduate Students by Race/Ethnicity

Targeted Minorities include African American, Native American, Hispanic/Latino/a, Southeast Asian (Cambodians, Laotians, Vietnamese, and Hmong). International students are not counted within the targeted minority categories.


2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 20110%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

2.3% 2.4% 2.4% 2.5% 2.7% 2.9% 2.9% 3.0% 2.8% 2.8%

1.0% 1.2% 1.4% 1.6% 1.7% 1.8% 1.8% 1.9% 1.9% 1.8%0.5% 0.5%0.6% 0.6% 0.6%

0.7% 0.7% 0.8% 0.9% 1.0%2.4% 2.4%2.6%

2.8%3.1%

3.3% 3.6%3.8% 3.9% 4.3%

% o

f Tot

al U

nder

grad

uate

s

His-panic/ Latino/a

Native American

SE Asian

African Ameri-can

From 2002 to 2011: Increases in

undergraduate enrollment in all race/ethnic categories

3.7 percentage point increase in undergraduate targeted minority enrollment

International Students: 6% of Undergraduate Enrollment2011 data is preliminary.

From 2002 to 2011: 3.1 percentage

point increase in first-year undergraduate targeted minority enrollment

Indicator 2 Detail: Percent Enrollment of First-Year Targeted Minority Undergraduates, by Race/Ethnicity



2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 20110%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

2.6% 2.7% 2.7% 2.9% 3.3% 3.0% 2.6% 3.0% 2.6% 2.8%

2.1% 1.5% 1.9% 1.9%2.0% 2.2%

1.6%2.2%

2.2% 2.0%

0.5%0.6%

0.8% 0.6%0.6% 0.9%

0.9%

1.2%1.0% 1.0%

2.8%2.6%

3.3% 3.4%3.7% 3.7%

4.2%

4.7%

3.7%5.2%

% o

f Tot

al F

irst Y

ear U

nder

grad

uate

s

His-panic/ Latino/a

Native American

SE Asian

African American


Nebraska

Iowa

Indiana

Missouri

Oregon

Penn State

Colorado

Stony Brook

Minnesota

Texas A & M

Virginia

Arizona

Florida

Texas

Rutgers

UC-Davis

UC-San Diego

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

N = 1,787N = 2,135N = 2,003N = 2,042N = 3,797N = 3,900N = 2,917N = 2,776N = 2,446N = 4,042N = 5,579N = 6,193N = 4,118N = 2,757N = 2,511N = 6,087N = 5,903

N = 5,952N = 9,060N = 4,339N = 3,781

N = 8,449N = 9,493

N = 9,049N = 11,795N = 11,943

N = 16,039N = 8,557N = 13,156

N = 14,408N = 13,949N = 15,355

N = 14,752N = 15,415

Percent of Undergraduates

Percent of Undergraduates who are Minorities at AAU Public Institutions, Fall 2009

Average Percent Minority for AAU Public Institutions: 27%

9 AAU Public Institutions have a lower percent of minority students than UW-Madison.

12 AAU Public Institutions have a smaller number of minority students than UW-Madison.

Access: Peers


Source: IPEDS Fall Enrollment, Fall 2009

80%

Indicator 3: Percent Enrollment of Targeted Minority Graduate Students, by Race/Ethnicity


From 2002 to 2011: Increases in

graduate student enrollment in all race/ethnic categories

2.8 percentage point increase in graduate targeted minority enrollment

International Students make up 24.3% of graduate enrollment


2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

-2%

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

2.2% 2.1% 2.2% 2.1% 2.3% 2.5% 2.7% 2.7% 2.6% 2.7%

0.6% 0.5% 0.3% 0.5% 0.6% 0.7% 0.7% 0.8% 0.9% 1.0%0.5% 0.5% 0.4% 0.5%0.6% 0.7% 0.8% 1.0% 1.0% 1.0%2.4% 2.5% 2.5% 2.7%2.8% 2.9% 2.9%

3.2% 3.5% 3.7%

% o

f Tot

al G

radu

ate

Stud

ent E

nrol

lmen

t

Hispanic/ Latino/a

Native American

SE Asian

African American


• From 2002 to 2011: 1.4 percentage

point increase in professional targeted minority enrollment

International Students make up 4.6% of professional student enrollment

Indicator 4: Percent Enrollment of Targeted Minority Professional Students, by Race/Ethnicity



2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 20110%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

3.2% 3.6% 3.4% 3.9% 4.0% 4.4% 4.5% 4.1% 4.2% 4.2%

0.4%0.3% 0.4%

0.7% 0.9%1.3% 1.6%

1.6% 1.3% 1.2%1.2% 1.1% 1.0%

0.9% 1.1%1.2%

1.3%1.2% 1.0% 1.0%

3.5%4.0% 4.1%

3.5%3.6%

3.7%3.7%

3.4% 3.4% 3.3%

% o

f Tot

al P

rofe

ssio

nal S

tude

nt E

nrol

lmen

t

Hispanic/ Latino/a

Native Ameri-canSE Asian

African American

2011 data is preliminary.Professional: DVM, MD, PharmD, Law, PA, MPH, DPT

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 20110

2

4

6

8

10

12

8.0 7.48.7 8.8

9.6 9.8 9.3

11.19.5

11.1

Percent Enrollment of Targeted Minority Students



• 9.9% of all undergraduates are targeted minorities.

• 11.1% of new students (new freshmen + new transfers) are targeted minorities.

All Undergraduates

New Undergraduates2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

6.2 6.5 7.1 7.5 8.0 8.6 9.0 9.7 9.5 9.9

Indicator 5: Percent Enrollment of Pell Grant Recipients



2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 201102468

1012141618

12.4 12.0 12.510.7 11.4 11.7 11.1

14.116 16.5

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 201102468

1012141618

11.9 12.6 12.8 11.6 11.5 12.2 11.714.7

17.0 16.0 • 16% of all undergraduates are Pell Grant recipients.

• 16.5% of new students (new freshmen + new transfers) are Pell Grant recipients.

All Undergraduates

New Undergraduates

Percent of Undergraduates who Pell Recipients at AAU Public Institutions, 2008-09

Average percent pell recipients for AAU public institutions: 19%

3 AAU public institutions have a lower or equal percent of Pell recipients than UW-Madison.

10 AAU public institutions have a lower number of Pell recipients than UW-Madison.

Access: Peers

Source: IPEDS Student Financial Aid Data, 2008-09http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html

50%

Pell Grants are federally funded grants for students with high financial need. This indicator is a proxy for low income student enrollments.

VirgininaColoradoMichigan

WisconsinIndianaKansas

MarylandNorth Carolina

Penn StatePurdueIllinois

MissouriPittsburgh

Texas A&MIowa

MinnesotaNebraska

Ohio StateIowa State

Michigan StateOregon

WashingtonTexas

ArizonaRutgersFlorida

UC-IrvineUC-Santa Barbara

SUNY - BuffaloSUNY - Stony Brook

UC-BerkeleyUC-Davis

UCLAUC-San Diego

0 10 20 30 40 50N = 1,275

N = 3,267N = 3,078N = 3,534

N = 4,303N = 2,985N = 3,809N = 2,490N = 5,610N = 5,121N = 4,744N = 3,421N = 2,672N = 6,192N = 3,281N = 5,584N = 3,087N = 7,291N = 4,092N = 6,837N = 3,311N = 5,713N = 7,952N = 6,557

N = 6,784N = 8,209N = 5,567N = 4,802

N = 5,384N = 4,824N = 7,487N = 7,610N = 8,160

N = 7,589

Percent of Undergraduates

• Data on first-generation status is collected at the time of application.

• Question first asked in 2005.

• 21.9% of New Students (New Freshmen + New Transfers) are

Indicator 6: Percent Enrollment of First-Generation Students


2011 data is preliminary.2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

0

5

10

15

20

25

21.9 23.0 23.4 22.9 23.1 21.4 21.9

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 20110

5

10

15

20

25

8.1

13.317.6

20.8 22.3 22.1 21.8All Undergraduates

New Undergraduates

Accumulating Data

10%

8%

5%

10%

7%

15%

11% 10%

3%

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

14%

16%

18%

Total CALS Business Education Engineering SoHE L&S Nursing Pharmacy

N = 2,833

N = 234

N = 90

N = 207

N = 288

N = 143

N = 1,782 N = 82

N = 1

• In 2011, the College of Letters and Science has the largest number of undergraduate targeted minority students enrolled.

• The School of Human Ecology has the largest percentage of undergraduate targeted minority students enrolled, with 15 percent of SoHE students identifying as targeted minorities.



Percent Targeted Minority Enrollment by School/College: Undergraduates, Fall 2011


9%

7% 7%

16%

6%

13%

4%

7%

14%

9%

6%

8%

6%

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

14%

16%

18%

Total CALS Business Educ. Engin. SoHE Nelson L&S Law SMPH Nursing Pharm Vet Med

N = 69 N = 42

N = 183

N = 89

N = 9

N = 6

N = 309

N = 124

N = 135

N = 8

N = 48

N = 23

N = 1,045

Targeted Minority Enrollment by School/College:Graduate/Professional Programs, Fall 2011



• Fall 2011• The School of

Education has the largest percentage of targeted minority graduate students (16%).


Access: Enrollment



Total 1728 28677 6.0% 2833 28736 9.9% 1105 59 3.8%CALS 104 2190 4.7% 234 2764 8.5% 130 574 3.7%

Business 55 1332 4.1% 90 1940 4.6% 35 608 0.5%Education 137 2371 5.8% 207 2016 10.3% 70 -355 4.5%

Engineering 147 3601 4.1% 288 3847 7.5% 141 246 3.4%SoHE 66 1005 6.6% 143 928 15.4% 77 -77 8.8%

L&S 1232 17495 7.0% 1782 16384 10.9% 550 -1111 3.8%Nursing 22 446 4.9% 82 783 10.5% 60 337 5.5%

Pharmacy 0 15 0.0% 1 38 2.6% 1 23 2.6%

% of Total Enrollment

Targeted Minority

EnrollmentTotal

Enrollment% of Total

Enrollment

Targeted Minority Undergraduate Enrollment by School/College2002-2011

2002 2011 ChangeTargeted Minority

EnrollmentTotal


Enrollment

Targeted Minority

EnrollmentTotal

Enrollment


Access: Enrollment


Individuals who indicate more than one race have a primary race selected giving precedence to the least prevalent race/ethnicity within Wisconsin’s population.


CALS 2,764 2,185 64 98 49 147 23 9 150 39Business 1,940 1,506 23 52 6 54 9 3 254 33

Education 2,016 1,719 54 87 44 47 22 8 15 20Engineering 3,847 3,027 68 128 58 184 34 8 288 52

SoHE 928 735 64 43 28 17 8 2 20 11L &S 16,384 12,573 498 796 317 760 171 47 979 243

Nursing 783 661 23 24 29 25 6 4 2 9Pharmacy 38 27 1 0 0 5 0 0 5 0

Total 28,736 22,433 795 1,228 531 1,239 273 81 1,713 407

Primary Race/Ethnic Detail of Enrollment (Undergraduate), by School/College, Fall 2011

Total WhiteAfrican

AmericanHispanic/ Latino/a

South East Asian Other Asian

American Indian

Hawaiian/ Pacific Islander International Unknown


Access: Enrollment



Total 708 10994 6.4% 1045 12078 8.7% 337 1084 2.2%CALS 42 978 4.3% 69 965 7.2% 27 -13 2.9%

Business 46 624 7.4% 42 598 7.0% -4 -26 -0.3%Education 118 1100 10.7% 183 1118 16.4% 65 18 5.6%

Engineering 41 1325 3.1% 89 1462 6.1% 48 137 3.0%SoHE 7 102 6.9% 9 67 13.4% 2 -35 6.6%

Nelson 6 163 3.7% 6 146 4.1% 0 -17 0.4%L&S 196 3842 5.1% 309 4252 7.3% 113 410 2.2%Law 118 882 13.4% 124 889 13.9% 6 7 0.6%

SMPH 70 1043 6.7% 135 1470 9.2% 65 427 2.5%Nursing 3 165 1.8% 8 127 6.3% 5 -38 4.5%

Pharmacy 23 603 3.8% 48 608 7.9% 25 5 4.1%Vet. Medicine 21 371 5.7% 23 367 6.3% 2 -4 0.6%

Targeted Minority

EnrollmentTotal

Enrollment

Targeted Minority


EnrollmentTotal

Enrollment

Change2002 2011

Targeted Minority Enrollment in Graduate/Professional Programs by School/College2002-2011

% of Total Enrollment

Targeted Minority

Enrollment% of Total Enrollment

Total Enrollment


Access: Enrollment


Individuals who indicate more than one race have a primary race selected giving precedence to the least prevalent race/ethnicity within Wisconsin’s population.


CALS 965 578 16 39 7 31 7 6 252 29Business 598 414 24 13 3 35 2 2 80 25

Education 1,118 712 76 67 16 35 24 3 160 25Engineering 1,462 680 19 52 10 56 8 3 599 35

SoHE 67 39 3 5 0 3 1 0 14 2Law 889 526 53 52 3 37 16 3 107 92

L & S 4,252 2,658 84 134 48 117 43 5 1,000 163Medicine 1,470 1,018 61 48 18 135 8 1 101 80

Nelson 146 110 2 3 0 4 1 1 17 8Nursing 127 101 3 2 2 1 2 0 11 5

Pharmacy 608 471 17 11 15 38 5 1 38 12Vet Med 367 308 8 10 1 11 4 0 16 9

Total 12,069 7,615 366 436 123 503 121 25 2,395 485

Primary Race/Ethnic Detail of Enrollment (Grad/Professional), by School/College, Fall 2011

American Indian

Hawaiian/ Pacific Islander International UnknownTotal White

African American

Hispanic/ Latino/a Other Asian

South East Asian


Indicator 7: Percent UndergraduateEnrollment by Gender, Fall 2011



2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 201142%

44%

46%

48%

50%

52%

54%

56%

51.5%

48.5%

Women

Men

Women havecomprised morethan half ofundergraduateenrollment since1996.

52%57%

43%

72%

19%

81%

53%

89%

58%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Total CALS Business Education Engineering SoHE L&S Nursing Pharmacy

Women as a Percentage of Total Undergraduate Enrollment, by School/College, Fall 2011


• Fall 2011• Nursing has the

highest percent of women undergraduates enrolled (89%) and Engineering has the lowest percent (19%)


Women havecomprised morethan half ofgraduate/professionalenrollment since2003

Indicator 8: Percent Graduate/ProfessionalEnrollment by Gender, Fall 2011


2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 201142%

44%

46%

48%

50%

52%

54%

56%

51%

49%

Women

Men


Women as a Percentage of Total Grad/Professional Enrollment, by School/College, Fall 2011


• Fall 2011• Nursing has the

highest percent of women enrolled in a graduate or professional program, while Engineering has the lowest percent of women enrolled.


52%

34%

67%

20%

85%

64%

54%49%

67%

92%

54%

41%46%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

ALS BUS EDU EGR HEC IES L&S MED MSN NUR PHM VET LAW


Student Level 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010Undergraduates

Men 13,302 13,454 13,271 13,437 13,229 13,232 13,337 13,621 13,880 13,778 13,969Women 15,174 15,334 15,406 15,146 14,988 15,226 15,125 15,378 15,273 14,912 14,931Percent Women 53.3 53.3 53.7 53.0 53.1 53.5 53.1 53.0 52.4 52.0 51.7

Graduate StudentsMen 4,650 4,670 4,628 4,647 4,556 4,478 4,465 4,456 4,366 4,576 4,735Women 3,970 4,074 4,194 4,277 4,387 4,363 4,367 4,404 4,344 4,540 4,624Percent Women 46.1 46.6 47.5 47.9 49.1 49.3 49.4 49.7 49.9 49.8 49.4

Professional StudentsMen 1,027 1,003 999 1,037 1,050 1,064 1,110 1,120 1,123 1,143 1,157Women 1,347 1,337 1,381 1,393 1,410 1,469 1,469 1,443 1,447 1,497 1,525Percent Women 56.7 57.1 58.0 57.3 57.3 58.0 57.0 56.3 56.3 56.7 56.9

Special StudentsMen 790 768 818 755 703 736 718 745 759 788 821Women 959 912 810 896 846 912 875 874 838 865 836Percent Women 54.8 54.3 49.8 54.3 54.6 55.3 54.9 54.0 52.5 52.3 50.5

TotalMen 19,769 19,895 19,716 19,876 19,538 19,510 19,630 19,942 20,128 20,285 20,682Women 21,450 21,657 21,791 21,712 21,631 21,970 21,836 22,099 21,902 21,814 21,916Percent Women 52.0 52.1 52.5 52.2 52.5 53.0 52.7 52.6 52.1 51.8 51.4

Source : Registrar's Enrollment Report

Fall Semester Enrollment by Gender

Access: EnrollmentHome County of UW-Madison Undergraduate Students (Wisconsin Residents)


Among the 72 Wisconsin counties, each is represented by at least 5 undergraduate students in Fall 2011.

There are 18,107 Wisconsin Resident undergraduates enrolled in Fall 2011.

Red: More than 4% of resident undergraduates from countyBlack: Between 2% and 4% of resident undergraduates from countyLight Gray: Less than 2% (but at least one student) of resident undergraduates from county

Access: EnrollmentStudents from Farms: Home County of UW-Madison Undergraduates from Wisconsin Farms* in 2010


*Students from farms are identified by the presence of farm income on the Free Application for Federal Student Aid (FAFSA). There may be undergraduates from Wisconsin farms who did not apply for financial aid.

Black: More than 4% of undergraduates from farmsDark Gray: Between 2% and 4% of undergraduates from farms Light Gray: Less than 2% (but at least one undergraduate) from farms White: No undergraduates from farms

Access: EnrollmentHome County of UW-Madison Undergraduate FASTrack Participants in 2010


FASTrack is a financial aid program that assures a student’s financial need will be met each year for four years. Single, financially dependent students are considered for the program based on the family's current and past financial situation and need for assistance. Both work and borrowing are minimized to reduce the student's financial burden. All students who apply for aid are considered for FASTrack, there is no special application. Qualifying students are selected by the Office of Student Financial Aid.

Black: More than 4% of undergraduates in the FASTrack programDark Gray: Between 2% and 4% of undergraduates in the FASTrack programLight Gray: Less than 2% (but at least one student) of undergraduates in the FASTrack program White: No undergraduate participants in the FASTrack program

Access: Diversity Programs

Programs that increase access and success for underrepresented populations on campus• Programs with a Pre-College Component

– PEOPLE– POSSE

• Student Support Programs– CEO (formerly TRIO)– Academic Advancement Program– Pathways

• Scholarship Programs– Chancellor’s Scholars– Powers/Knapp– First Wave

Academic Excellence Communitieshttp://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html

Fall 2011 Undergraduate Participation in Academic Excellence Communities

*Targeted Minorities include African American, Native American, Hispanic/Latino/a, Southeast Asian (Cambodians, Laotians, Vietnamese, and Hmong). International students are not counted within the targeted minority categories.

Academic Excellence Community

Total Participants

Targeted Minority* Male Wisconsin

ResidentFirst

GenerationPell Grant

Eligible

Academic Advancement Program (AAP)

393 96% 44% 70% 25% 44%

Center for EducationalOpportunity (CEO) 477 90% 40% 69% 94% 84%

PEOPLE 342 89% 40% 95% 58% 63%

Posse 137 84% 48% 0% 66% 66%

First Wave 46 65% 42% 22% 52% 61%

Chancellor’s Scholar Program 193 100% 36% 69% 35% 29%

Powers/KnappProgram 160 100% 47% 86% 51% 46%

Pathways 36 89% 58% 53% 17% 28%

All Undergraduates 28,736 10% 48% 63% 22% 16%


Access: Pipeline

The population in high school serves as a major pool for UW-Madison undergraduates• We can estimate the pipeline for several groups

– Minority Students– Low-Income (Pell or Free/Reduced Lunch)– First-Generation Students– Rural students

Pipelinehttp://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html

Access: Pipeline: First Generation

*“Potential” First Generation Students does not imply any level of academic achievement, school enrollment, or preparedness. This estimate reflects the population 13-17 with no parent/guardian in the household with a Bachelor’s Degree. Sources: Overall WI Population (U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2005-2007 Estimates), Potential First Generation Students (“Parental Education and College Participation Rates in Wisconsin”, Sara Lazenby, August 2009), Applicants, Admits, and Enrolls for 2009-10 School Year

An estimated 75% of 13-17 year old Wisconsin residents live in households where no parent/guardian holds a bachelor’s degree.

Approximately 26% of UW-Madison Resident New Freshman are first-generation students.

We do not have a reliable data source on high school graduation or college preparedness by parental education levels for Wisconsin residents.

UW-Madison Enrolled

UW-Madison Admits

UW-Madison Applicants

Population 13-17"Potential"* First

Generation Students

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%

Percent of Group Total

Wisconsin's First-Generation College-Going Recruiting Pool

(290,550 of 385,907)

(2,323 of 8,140)

(1,409 of 5,637)

(908 of 3,452)

No data available on graduation rates or academic achievement by parental education levels within Wisconsin


2009-10 Data

Access: Pipeline: Low Income

“Economically Disadvantaged” represents those students who are eligible for free/reduced lunch.Sources: Wisconsin DPI WINSS, 2008-09 Enrollment by Student Group, Completions by Student GroupUW-Madison Data based on Fall 2009-10

• 34% of Public K-12 students in Wisconsin are Economically Disadvantaged (2008-09)

• 23% of Public High School Graduates are Economically Disadvantaged (2008-09)

• We have no reliable information on income of applicant students, all data based on financial aid applications

• 16% of Resident New Freshmen are Pell Grant Recipients

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%


Wisconsin's Low-Income Recruiting Pool

(88,196 of 279,103)

(13,042 of 66,266)

No Data Available on Low-Income Status of UW-Madison Applicants or Admits

(561 of 3,437)

Economically Disadvantaged High School Public School Students

Economically Disadvantaged Public High School Graduates

UW-Madison Enrolled


2009-10 Data

Access: Pipeline: Minority

• 21% of Public High School students in Wisconsin are minority students(2008-09)

• 18% of Public High School Graduates are minority students (2008-09)

• 15% of Resident New Freshmen are minority students


“Well-prepared” high school graduates are in the top quartile of their graduating classes and score at least 22 (WI Average) on the ACT (or equivalent SAT score). This does not reflect any policies by UW-Madison admissions with regards to academic preparation requirements.

UW-Madison Enrolled

UW-Madison Admits

UW-Madison Applicants

"Well-Prepared" Minority Public High

School Graduates

Minority Public High School Graduates

Minority Public High School Students

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%


Wisconsin's Minority Recruiting Pool

(290,550 of 385,907)

(1,114 of 8164)

(733 of 5,651)

(517 of 3,457)

(697 of 11,623)

(11,623 of 66,266)

(57,495 of 279,103)2009-10 Data

Access: Pipeline: Rural• While over half of

WI high schools are considered rural, only 25% of 12th graders attend a rural high school.

• Rural high school students apply at lower rates than other students

• Once they apply, rural students are admitted and enroll at rates proportional to their application rate.

Source: High School Characteristics and Early Academic Performance at UW-Madison, Clare Huhn, APA, 2005


17

17

17

25

51

83

83

83

75

49

Percent of Enrolled Freshmen

Percent of Freshmen Admits

Percent of Freshmen Applicants

Percent of 12th Graders

Percent of High Schools

Percent Rural, by Pipeline Step Not Rural Rural

Impact of People and POSSE on Freshmen Enrollment

Targeted Minority New Freshmen Fall 2011 / Fall 20012011 New Freshmen (644) 2001 New Freshmen (389)

Non-Residents(256)

WI Residents(388)

Non-Residents (143)

WI Residents(246)

Illinois(96)

POSSE (9) Milwaukee(105)

PEOPLE (22) Illinois(42)

Milwaukee(76)Other (87) Other (83)

Minnesota(59)

Dane(68)

PEOPLE (37) Minnesota(36)

Dane(54)Other (31)

California(18)

POSSE (8) Waukesha(29)

PEOPLE (2) California(9)

Waukesha(16)Other (10) Other (27)

DC/Maryland/VA(18)

POSSE (11) Racine(11)

PEOPLE (2)New York (7) Brown

(12)Other (7) Other (9)

Other States(65)

Marathon(19)

Other States(49)

Outagamie(10)

Kenosha(17)

PEOPLE (8) Kenosha (7)Other (9)

Other Counties(139)

PEOPLE (7) Other Counties(71)Other (132)


• The first PEOPLE/POSSE students entered college in 2002

Access: Applicants, Admits, and Enrolls,New Freshmen, Fall 2011

• Wisconsin residents are the most likely applicants to be admitted and are most likely to enroll compared to other groups.


Total Applicants

% Admitted

% Enrolled/ Yield Rate

Overall 28,983 50.5 39.8

Male 14,265 47.8 40.5Female 14,688 53.1 39.3

Resident 8,921 62.9 61.9Domestic Non-Res. 12,023 49.4 22.5

International 4,570 26.9 20.5

Targeted Minorties 3,304 44.1 44.2Total Minority 5,257 48 38.1

First Generation 5,127 43.2 50.9

Access: Applicants, Admits, and Enrolls, Transfer Students, Fall 2011

• One reason for low admit rates for transfer applicants is that many applicants do not meet the minimum requirements for admission

• Wisconsin residents are the most likely applicants to be admitted and are most likely to enroll compared to other groups.


Total Applicants

% Admitted

% Enrolled/ Yield Rate

Overall 5,167 42.1 60.9

Male 2,627 43.2 57.2Female 2,540 40.9 64.8

Resident 2,726 51.9 71.1Domestic Non-Res. 1,166 35.1 35.2

International 968 22.3 46.8

Targeted Minorties 514 36.7 58.9Total Minority 713 40.4 58.8

First Generation 1,606 40.3 67.7

Access: Comparisonshttp://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html

• UW-Madison had 2,750 targeted minority undergraduates (Fall 2009)

• There are 2,528 institutions in the United States that grant bachelor’s degrees. Of these, only 816 (32.3%) have more total undergraduates enrolled than UW-Madison has targeted minority undergraduates enrolled

• There are 48 institutions in Wisconsin that grant bachelor’s degrees. Of these, only 18 (38%) have more total undergraduates enrolled than UW-Madison has targeted minority students enrolled

UW-Madison educates relatively large numbers of minority students

Components :• Retention• Course-taking• Success• Degree Completion

Access

Excellence


Retention

Retention


Retention


• 84% of the 2004 cohort graduated after six years.

• For the cohort entering in 2009-10, 95% of students were retained after one year.

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

Perc

ent R

etai

ned

Fall Semester of Entrance

Percent of First Year Undergraduates Retained after One Year (All Students)

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

Perc

ent G

radu

ated

Fall Semester of Entrance

Percent of First-Year Undergraduates Graduated After 6 Years (All Students)

Indicator 9: Retention and Graduation Rates of Targeted Minorities, Pell Recipients, and First-Generation Students



Summary of Retention and Graduation Rates by Student Group1-Year

Retention Rate % Difference 6-Year Graduation Rate % Difference

All New Freshmen 94.8 - 83.9 -Targeted Minority 91.3 -3.5 66.8 -17.1

First-Generation College Students* 93.1 -1.7 Freshmen Recipients of Pell Grants 92.5 -2.3 73.1 -10.8

Note: 1-Year Retention Rate for 2009 Cohort, 6-Year Graduation Rate for 2004 Cohort

* Graduation rates not yet available for first-generation college students,

Summary of Retention and Graduation Rates by Student Group


http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html1-Year Retention Rate % Difference 6-Year Graduation

Rate % Difference

All New Freshmen 94.8 - 83.9 -Women 95 0.2 85.6 1.7

Men 94.5 -0.3 81.8 -2.1Targeted Minority 91.3 -3.5 66.8 -17.1

Non-Targeted 95.2 0.4 85.5 1.6African American 91.9 -2.9 62.6 -21.3Native American 83.3 -11.5 60 -23.9

Hispanic/Latino/a 92.8 -2 71 -12.9South East Asian 91.2 -3.6 68.5 -15.4

Non-Targeted Asian 95.5 0.7 84.4 0.5International 92 -2.8 72.7 -11.2

Wisconsin Residents 95.4 0.6 85.6 1.7Non-Residents 92.9 -1.9 81.8 -2.1

First-Generation College Students* 93.1 -1.7 Freshmen Who Received Need-Based Aid 93.6 -1.2 78.9 -5

Freshmen Recipients of Pell Grants 92.5 -2.3 73.1 -10.8FIGs 94.4 -0.4 81.4 -2.5

Targeted Minority in FIGs 92.4 -2.4 63.8 -20.1PEOPLE 88.9 -5.9 75.7 -8.2

POSSE 96.6 1.8 82.6 -1.3Chancellor's Scholars 97.7 2.9 88.1 4.2

Powers/Knapp Scholars 92.5 -2.3 78.6 -5.3AAP Participants 90.4 -4.4 68.9 -15

First Wave* 100 5.2 CEO*

Pathways*Note: 1-Year Retention Rate for 2009 Cohort, 6-Year Graduation Rate for 2004 Cohort* Graduation rates not yet available for first-generation college students, First Wave. Data not yet available for CEO, Pathways





1-Year Retention Rate % Difference 6-Year Graduation

Rate % Difference

All New Freshmen 94.8 - 83.9 -Targeted Minority 91.3 -3.5 66.8 -17.1

Targeted Minority in an Academic Excellence Program 92.4

-2.4 75.1 -8.8

Targeted Minority Not in an Academic Excellence Program 90.4

-4.4 60.3 -23.6

PEOPLE 88.9 -5.9 75.7 -8.2POSSE 96.6 1.8 82.6 -1.3

Chancellor's Scholars 97.7 2.9 88.1 4.2Powers/Knapp Scholars 92.5 -2.3 78.6 -5.3

AAP Participants 90.4 -4.4 68.9 -15First Wave* 100 5.2

CEO*Pathways*

Note: 1-Year Retention Rate for 2009 Cohort, 6-Year Graduation Rate for 2004 Cohort*Retention/Graduation Rates not yet available for CEO and Pathways; Graduation rates not yet available for First Wave

Graduation Rates of Targeted Minorities by Participation in an Academic Excellence Program



1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 200450

55

60

65

70

75

80

85

90

All Students

Targeted Minorities in an Academic Excellence Program

Targeted Minorities not in an Academic Excellence Program

All Targeted Minorities

Retention and Graduation Rates, by Gender and Race/Ethnicity


Retained to Second Year (Men)

Retained to Second Year (Women)

Graduated in Six Years (Men)

Graduated in Six Years (Women)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

UW-Madison Retention and Graduation Rates By Gender and Race/Ethnicity

All Students White Asian/Pacific Islander Hispanic Black American Indian/Alaskan Native

Source: UW-Madison CSRDE Submission; 3-Year Average of Rates from 2002-2004, SL, APA, August 2011

Retention and Graduation Rates,among Student Athletes


Total White Black International0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

N=22,727 N=19,593

N=557

N=658N=357

N=253

N=64

N=26

Graduation Rates Among Student-Athletes (Average of 2000-2004 Entering Cohorts)

All Students Student-Athletes

Source: 2010 NCAA Graduation Rates Report. Data represents those groups with at least 10 student athletes in the four-cohort average. SL, APA, August 2011

Carn

egie

-Mel

lon

Arizo

naKa

nsas

SUN

Y-Bu

ffalo

Colu

mbi

aN

ebra

ska

SUN

Y-St

ony

Broo

kCo

lora

doO

rego

nIo

wa

Min

neso

taM

issou

riIo

wa

Stat

ePu

rdue

Indi

ana

Ohi

o St

ate

Rutg

ers

Pitt

sbur

ghW

eigh

ted

Aver

age

Mic

higa

n St

ate

Geor

gia

Tech

Texa

s A&

MW

ashi

ngto

nTe

xas

UC S

anta

Bar

bara

UC D

avis

UC Ir

vine

Mar

ylan

dSy

racu

seFl

orid

aW

iscon

sinIll

inoi

sPe

nn S

tate

Nor

th C

arol

ina

Mic

higa

nCa

ltech

UCLA

Vand

erbi

ltUC

Ber

kele

yCo

rnel

lM

ITVi

rgin

iaN

orth

wes

tern

Brow

nHa

rvar

d

-25%

-20%

-15%

-10%

-5%

0%

5%

Perc

enta

ge P

oint

Gap

Percentage Point Graduation Gap of Fall 2002-2004 Entrance Cohorts, Selected AAU Institutions

Selected Institutions, CSRDE data, sorted from lowest to highest overall graduation rates.

• Average graduation gap among AAU institutions is 9.1%

• Gap at UW-Madison is 17.1 percent


• Grades• GPA• Honors and Awards• Participation in High

Demand Programs

Access

Excellence


Retention

Excellence



• “Wisconsin Experience” captures four inquiry-based high-impact practices and includes:– Substantial research experiences that

generate knowledge and analytical skills

– Global and cultural competencies and engagement

– Leadership and activism opportunities– Application of knowledge in the “real

world”• In 2009-10, 88% of bachelor’s degree

recipients participated in at least one Wisconsin Experience Program

• Targeted minority graduates were slightly more likely to have completed at least one Wisconsin Experience activity.

Excellence: Wisconsin Experience



88% 92%

0

20

40

60

80

100

Percent of Graduates with at Least One Wisconsin Experience Activity

All Graduates Targeted Minority Graduates



• In 2009-10 targeted minority students were slightly more likely to have completed a Wisconsin Experience activity.


Non-Targeted Targeted* Non-Targeted Targeted*ALS 588 45 100 100BUS 639 28 81 82EDU 360 24 96 96EGR 564 28 87 96HEC 278 43 92 93L&S 3,314 324 85 90MPH 51 3 100 100NUR 164 16 100 100PHM 4 1 100 100Total 5,962 512 88 92

Number of Graduates Percent of Graduates with at Least One Wisconsin Experience Activity

Bachelor's Degree Recipients in 2009-10 by Targeted Minority Status



• Transfer-start graduates participated in Wisconsin Experience activities at lower rates (80%) than freshman-start graduates (90%).


ALS 491 141 100 100BUS 540 127 84 70EDU 286 98 98 90EGR 469 123 91 75HEC 238 83 93 89L&S 2,861 777 88 73MPH 29 25 100 100NUR 104 76 100 100PHM 3 2 100 100Total 5,021 1,453 90 80

Bachelor's Degree Recipients in 2009-10 by Type of Entrance to UW-Madison (Freshman or Transfer)

Number of Graduates Percent of Graduates with at Least One Wisconsin Experience Activity

Freshman-Start Transfer- Start

Freshman-Start Transfer- Start

• Diversity of:– Faculty– Staff– Administrators

• Climate

Access

Excellence


Retention




Institutional Receptivity: Employees

Employees self-report their race/ethnicity at the time of hire.

Employees may choose any of the following designations, and may select two or more races as of 2009:

• White• Black• Asian• American Indian• Hispanic/ Latino/a• Hawaiian



2011 data available in December 2011

Employees by Categoryhttp://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html

Executive/ Instructional OtherDirector/ Academic Academic Classified Employes- Graduate

Faculty Administrator Staff Staff Staff in-Training Assistants TotalWomen Black 23 11 11 46 59 15 83 248

Asian 69 5 68 198 130 108 516 1,094Native American 6 0 3 13 7 0 19 48Hispanic 31 10 24 52 138 19 136 410White/unknown 541 171 870 2,523 2,578 280 1,632 8,595Two or more races 4 0 5 20 17 0 5 51Total 674 197 981 2,852 2,929 422 2,391 10,446

Men Black 24 9 23 39 70 8 57 230Asian 169 1 91 208 103 215 741 1,528Native American 4 3 2 10 9 2 8 38Hispanic 46 8 33 38 153 17 132 427White/unknown 1,252 190 1,092 1,939 2,135 346 1,957 8,911Two or more races 8 2 3 6 11 0 5 35Total 1,503 213 1,244 2,240 2,481 588 2,900 11,169

Grand Total 2,177 410 2,225 5,092 5,410 1,010 5,291 21,615

2010 Headcount of Faculty and Staff by Gender and Race/Ethnicity

Source: October IADS data. Notes: Non-duplicating headcount reported- see Technical Note # 7. LTEs, Student and Unclassified hourly workers excluded. See technical note #10 for information on new race/ethnicity categories.




2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010Faculty Women 546 563 586 603 617 638 643 648 663 674

Men 1,667 1,662 1,650 1,635 1,603 1,572 1,555 1,530 1,512 1,503Total 2,213 2,225 2,236 2,238 2,220 2,210 2,198 2,178 2,175 2,177

Executive/Director/ Women 171 183 187 187 188 179 182 186 192 197Administrator Men 205 198 202 201 200 197 201 201 207 213

Total 376 381 389 388 388 376 383 387 399 410Instructional Women 763 793 795 836 876 871 901 942 973 981Academic Staff Men 1,099 1,123 1,088 1,113 1,162 1,152 1,147 1,197 1,210 1,244

Total 1,862 1,916 1,883 1,949 2,038 2,023 2,048 2,139 2,183 2,225Other Women 2,373 2,475 2,482 2,522 2,494 2,530 2,597 2,667 2,751 2,852Academic Staff Men 1,902 2,004 2,091 2,150 2,158 2,133 2,181 2,179 2,187 2,240

Total 4,275 4,479 4,573 4,672 4,652 4,663 4,778 4,846 4,938 5,092Classified Staff Women 2,876 2,902 2,887 2,872 2,852 2,829 2,843 2,866 2,904 2,929

Men 2,236 2,252 2,287 2,365 2,333 2,353 2,385 2,399 2,462 2,481Total 5,112 5,154 5,174 5,237 5,185 5,182 5,228 5,265 5,366 5,410

Employes-in-Training Women 275 281 282 314 324 324 325 361 424 422Men 437 459 460 485 489 503 482 507 571 588Total 712 740 742 799 813 827 807 868 995 1,010

Graduate Assistants Women 2,001 2,128 2,243 2,341 2,398 2,310 2,261 2,279 2,327 2,391Men 2,794 2,788 2,876 2,881 2,888 2,828 2,822 2,728 2,779 2,900Total 4,795 4,916 5,119 5,222 5,286 5,138 5,083 5,007 5,106 5,291

Total Women 9,005 9,325 9,462 9,675 9,749 9,681 9,752 9,949 10,234 10,446Men 10,340 10,486 10,654 10,830 10,833 10,738 10,773 10,741 10,928 11,169

Grand Total 19,345 19,811 20,116 20,505 20,582 20,419 20,525 20,690 21,162 21,615Source: October EEO and IADS data. Notes: Non-duplicating headcount reported- see Technical Note #7. LTEs, Student and Unclassified hourly workers excluded.

Headcount of Faculty and Staff by Gender

Indicator 10: Women as a Percentage of all Faculty



• In Fall 2010 31% of Faculty were women.

• 24.4% of Full Professors, 35.3% of Associate Professors, and 43% of Assistant Professors were women.

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 20100

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

Num

ber o

f Fac

ulty

Perc

ent o

f Fac

ulty

31%




• Women make up just under 50% of all employees at UW-Madison.

• A smaller proportion of faculty members are women (31%)

Total Faculty Exec/Dir/

Admin

Instructional Acad. Staff

Other Acad. Staff Classified0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

Percent of Women Faculty and Staff by Employee Type

Indicator 11: Minority Faculty Recruitment

• Increases in the percent of faculty hires that are racial/ethnic minorities.

2010-11 Data is preliminary.


82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 100

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

UW-Madison Faculty Hires by Minority Status

Minority Faculty

Year of Hire

Perc

ent

Madison Plan

Strategic Hires SHI - 2

Black, 2.2%

Asian, 10.9%

American Indian, 0.5%

Hispanic, 3.5%

Two or More Races, 0.6%

0

3

6

9

12

15

18

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Minority Faculty as a Percent of the Total Faculty Headcount

16.8%16.9%16.2%

13.2%13.8%

14.3% 14.6%15.1%

15.4%

17.6%

Indicator 12: Minority Faculty Representation

• In 2010: 2,177 total faculty members

• 17.6% (384) of Faculty are racial/ethnic minorities.

• 8% increase in minority faculty since 1996

2011 data available in December 2011, New race/ethnic categories implemented in 2010


Institutional Receptivity: Staff

• In 2010, 2,225 Instructional Academic Staff members

• 11.8% (263) of Instructional Academic Staff are racial/ethnic minorities

• 2.7% increase in minority instructional academic staff since 1996



0

3

6

9

12

15

18

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Minority Instructional Academic Staff as a Percent of the Total Headcount

11.7%12.1%

11.2%11.9%11.5%

10.5%9.8%

8.8%8.9%

Black,1.5% (34)

Asian,7.1% (159)

American Indian,.2% (5)

Hispanic/Latino/a,2.6% (57)

11.8%

Two or More Races,.4% (8)

0

3

6

9

12

15

18

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Minority Non-Instructional Academic Staff as a Percent of the Total Headcount

Hispanic/ Latino/a, 1.8% (90)

AmericanIndian, .5% (23)

Asian,8.0% (406)

Black,1.7% (85)

12%12%11.7%11.2%11.1%10.9%

10.2%9.6%9.4%

12.3%



• In 2010: 5,092 non-instructional Academic Staff

• 12.3% of non-instructional Academic Staff are minorities

• 3.7% increase in minority non-instructional academic staff since 1996




• In 2010: 5,410 Classified Staff members

• 12.9% (697) of classified staff are minorities

• 8.7% increase in minority classified staff since 1996



0

3

6

9

12

15

18

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Minority Classified Staff as a Percent of the Total Headcount

12.6%12%11.8%11.3%

11%10%

9.1%8.5%8.1%

Hispanic/ Latino/a, 5.4% (291)American Indian,.3% (16)

Asian, 4.3% (233)

Black,2.4% (129)

12.9%

Two or More Races, 0.5% (28)


• In 2010: 410 Executive/Director/Administrators

• 11.9% of Executive/Director/Administrators are racial/ethnic minorities

• 1.4% increase in minority Executive/Director/Administrators since 1996.



0

3

6

9

12

15

18

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Minority Executive/Director/Administrators as a Percent of the Total Headcount

Hispanic/Latino/a, 4.4% (18)American Indian, .7% (3)

Asian, 1.5% (6)

Black,4.9% (20)

11.2%11.6%11.2%11.2%10.8%10.8%11.1%

10.2%10.9%

11.9%



- Around 13% of all employees are minorities

- A larger proportion of faculty are minorities.



Total Faculty Exec/Dir/

Admin

Instructional Acad. Staff

Other Acad. Staff

Classified0%2%4%6%8%

10%12%14%16%18%20%

Percent of Minority Faculty and Staff by Employee Type

Institutional Receptivity:

Peer Comparisons

for Faculty Diversity

Non-White Full-Time Faculty as a Percent of Total Full-Time Faculty at AAU Public Institutions, 2009-10

Source: IPEDS Fall HR, 2009-10 (AAUDE data)http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html

VirginiaWisconsin

OregonIndiana

North CarolinaPenn State

KansasWashingtonStony Brook

ColoradoNebraska

Ohio StateMissouri

UC-Santa BarbaraFlorida

Texas A & MPittsburgh

Michigan StateUC-Berkeley

IowaBuffaloIllinois

UC-San DiegoArizona

Iowa StateUC-Davis

MinnesotaTexasUCLA

MarylandUC-Irvine

PurdueRutgers

Michigan

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50%

N=357N=528

N=224N=473N=630N=685N=555N=776N=344N=553N=396N=816N=744N=280N=1,058N=583N=1,048N=678N=597N=604N=411N=617N=655N=696N=616N=788

N=1,210N=800N=1,073N=951

N=661N=805N=812

N=2,093

Average percent non-white faculty for AAU public institutions: 26%

UW-Madison: 18%

1 AAU public institution has a lower percent of non-white faculty.

7 AAU public institutions have a lower number of non-white faculty.

Institutional Receptivity: Tenure

• Those who did not receive tenure include the following:– Those who were denied

tenure– Those who left the university

for another position elsewhere

– A few faculty members still hold probationary appointments after 9 years.

• Tenure and promotion rates are calculated at 6 and 9 years after hire, to account for those who have extensions on the tenure clock.

• Data combine hires from 1989-90 to 2003-04 or 1991-92 to 2003-04. This is necessary to account for small numbers of hires.

• Small Ns make tenure rates subject to large variation.


Notes about faculty tenure data:

55%

72%

42%

64%

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

6 Years 9 Years

Percent Promoted to Tenure by Gender,within Six (6) and Nine (9) Years

Men Women

Indicator 13: Percent of Faculty Promoted to Tenure by Gender

• At 9 years, 64% of women faculty have been promoted to tenure.Percent tenured based on data for hires from 1995-96 to 2004-05


51%

70%

47%

65%

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

6 Years 9 Years

Percent Promoted to Tenure by Minority Status, within Six (6) and Nine (9) Years

Non-Minority Minority

Indicator 14: Percent of Faculty Promoted to Tenure by Minority Status

• At 9 Years, 65% of minority faculty members have been promoted to tenure.


Percent tenured based on data for hires from 1995-96 to 2004-05

3220

3527

1632

14 29

3311

27 10

19

3823

34

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Minority Males Minority Female Non-Minority Male Non-Minority Female

Faculty Disciplinary Divison Affiliation,by Minority Status and Gender

Social Studies

Physical Science

Arts and Humanities

BiologicalSciences

Institutional Receptivity: Promotion

• Selecting a divisional affiliation is a step in the tenure process. Faculty are not required to identify their divisional affiliation at the time of hire, but many do.

• Women, especially minority women, are heavily concentrated within the Social Studies Division

Note: Chart excludes 24 faculty members who have not yet selected a disciplinary division, as they are not required to do so until they go up for tenure. Data as of October 2010 payroll.


72%

81% 79%74%

57%64% 66%

81%

72%

48%

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Total Physical Sciences Arts and Humanities

Biological Sciences Social Studies

Percent of Faculty Promoted within Nine (9) Years, by Gender and Division

Men Women

N=547

N=279

N=89N=144

N=29

N=93N=190 N=74

N=124

N=83


• A lower percentage of women and men are promoted to tenure within the Social Studies.

• The largest gap in tenure rates by gender is within the Physical Sciences division.

Data on faculty hires from 1989-90 to 2002-03


61%

71% 68% 67%

45%

69%

82% 81%

71%

54%

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Total Physical Sciences Arts and Humanities

Biological Sciences Social Studies

Percent of Faculty Promoted within Nine (9) Years, by Minority Status and Division

Minority Non-Minority

N=157

N=669 N=44

N=129

N=42

N=140

N=34N=230

N=37N=170


• A lower percentage of faculty members are promoted to tenure within the Social Studies division.

• The largest gap in tenure rates by minority status is within the Physical Sciences and Arts and Humanities.






61 61

74

63

45

63

78

6772

46

72 71

85

78

5964

6973

83

48

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Total Biological Sciences Physical Sciences Arts and Humanities

Social Studies

Percent of Faculty Promoted within Nine (9) Years, by Gender and Division

Minority Men Minority Women Non-Minority Men Non-Minority Women

WomenMenWomenMen

Biological Sciences

99 59 448

Number of Faculty Promoted to Tenure

21

19

39

20

Non-MinorityMinority

70

67103

170

105Physical Sciences

221

60

24

70Arts and Humanities

Social Studies

Total

16

23

6

14




• All groups have lower promotion rates within the Social Studies division.

• Women, and especially minority women, are more likely to be within the social studies division.

• For groups with small hiring pools, the effect of one person’s tenure/non-tenure can affect the percent tenured dramatically.

• Those not receiving tenure includes those who took a position elsewhere or still have a probationary appointment after 9 years.

Key findings from tenure/promotion data:

Institutional Receptivity: Climate

Selected NSSE 2011 Results

** significantly different

Percent of Seniors who often or very much:

See: http://www.apa.wisc.edu/performance_students_surveys.html


Tried to better understand someone else's views by imagining how it looks from their perspective

Included diverse perspectives in class discussion or assignments

Had serious conversations with student of a different race or ethnicity than your own

Understand people of other racial/ethnic backgrounds

75

63

71

55

66

56

49

56

67

57

52

56AllNon-MinorityMinority

**

**

Institutional Receptivity: Climate

Selected NSSE 2011 ResultsPercent of Seniors for whom the university emphasizes quite a bit or very much:

See: http://www.apa.wisc.edu/performance_students_surveys.html


Encouraging contact among students from different economic, social, and racial or ethnic backgrounds

Helping you cope with non-academic responsibilities (work, family, etc)

Providing the support you need to thrive socially

Providing the support you need to succeed academically

44

25

40

71

47

21

41

72

46

22

41

72

AllNon-minorityMinority

Summary of Indicators

Indicators present in this report:1. Percent enrollment of minority undergraduate students2. Percent enrollment of targeted minority undergraduate students3. Percent enrollment of targeted minority graduate students4. Percent enrollment of targeted minority professional students5. Percent enrollment of Pell grant recipients6. Percent enrollment of first-generation students7. Percent enrollment of undergraduates by gender8. Percent enrollment of graduate/professional students by gender9. Retention/Graduation rates of targeted minorities, Pell grant recipients,

and first-generation students.10. Women as a percent of all Faculty11. Minority Faculty recruitment12. Minority Faculty representation13. Percent of Faculty promoted to tenure by gender14. Percent of Faculty promoted to tenure by minority status


Diversity Update 2011

• Slideshow available at http://www.apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html

• Questions about these slides:– Sara Lazenby ([email protected])– Jocelyn Milner ([email protected])

http://www.apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html

mailto:[email protected]

mailto:[email protected]

diversity update 2011 september 2011

Documents

targeted minority collections

external data reporting

htmlinternational students

html2011 data

minority enrollment3

raceethnicity information

percentage point increase

educational outcomeshttp