doc.: ieee 802.15-00/098r0 submission march 2000 robert f. heile, gteslide 1 802.15 thursday report...

March 2000

Robert F. Heile, GTESlide 1

doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/098r0

Submission

802.15 Thursday Report to the SEC

Bob Heile, Chair, 802.15

March 9, 2000

March 2000


doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/098r0

Submission

Press/News Releases

• TG2 News Byte 00/093r0

• News Release on BT/802.15 00/094r0

• Press Release on TG2 and High Rate 99/171r4

Material Reviewed and OK’ed by Vic Hayes, S. Kerry, and Al Petrick on behalf of 802.11

March 2000


doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/098r0

Submission

Straw Poll Results

• To Eliminate the Friday Plenary 25/0/0• To Hold the SEC on Friday Morning 31/0/0• As an offset to the IPF fees, contribute the

$100 per meeting to initiate Program 23/0• Would you consider soliciting your company

to be an 802 sponsor for this program for about $10K per year 2/17

March 2000


doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/098r0

Submission

Election of Officers-802.15Proposed Slate of Officers, March 6, 2000:

Chair: Bob Heile, GTE

Vice Chair: Ian Gifford, M/A Com

Secretary: Pat Kinney, Intermec

Technical Editor: Tom Siep, Texas Instruments

Asst Sec/Tech Ed: Mike McInnis, Boeing

Motion to the Working Group, Monday March 6,2000:

Move to accept the proposed slate as the Leadership of 802.15moved: Ivan Reede second: Rick Alfvin

Motion Passed 26/0/0

March 2000


doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/098r0

Submission

High Rate PAR• Received comments from 802.11• Comments addressed in 99/165r6.• Revised PAR reviewed in Joint Session with 802.11

and approved by 802.11 (21/2/9) • 802.15 moved to approve the revisions to the High

Rate PAR doc 99/165r5 and recommend submitting the revised PAR as doc 99/165r6 to the SEC for approval and forwarding to NESCOM.– Moved by J Allen, seconded by B Kraemer. – Motion carried 20/0/1

March 2000


doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/098r0

Submission

Motion to the SEC

Move that the SEC forward the 802.15 High Rate PAR, Document 99/165r6, to March Meeting of NesCom for approval.

Moved: Bob HeileSecond: Vic Hayes

yes: 6no:abstain:4

passed

March 2000


doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/098r0

Submission

High Rate PAR

• Have developed a good working relationship between TG1 and the SIG. Could be compromised by trying to treat this PAR as an enhancement

• Strong motivation to keep activities separate to keep it clean and keep both projects moving at best speed.

• Have promoted 802 as the best place to undertake these activities in a speedy fashion.

• SIG not actively addressing the problem addressed by this PAR.

March 2000


doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/098r0

Submission

High Rate PAR

• Strong Possibility of a New or Strongly Modified MAC– 802.15.1 will not effectively support video or large file

transfer fundamental to this PAR.• Meeting aggressive speed and cost goals requires being

able to entertain new concepts.– SIG is looking at new architectures to achieve 10Mbits/s

and is not even contemplating 20+Mbits/s• Is expecting to modify the MAC to reach 10Mbits/s• Is contemplating a multi-mode solution at 10Mbits/s

March 2000


doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/098r0

Submission

March 2000


doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/098r0

Submission

Name Suggestions for High RateThanks for all the responses

• Jaws• JawBreaker• GoldMind• HON (Home Operations

Network• SweetTooth• FlashWave• Root Canal - (Better

than a blue tooth)

• Multimedia ISM• Dentures• White Teeth (32 teeth =

32 Mbps?)• Top Gun (“I have a

need for Speed”-movie quote)

• Top Tooth

March 2000


doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/098r0

Submission

WLLANWWPPANAN

March 2000


doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/098r0

Submission

Consumer Consumer ApplicationsApplications

BluetoothBluetoothTMTM

IEEE 802.15.1IEEE 802.15.1

HRSGHRSGIEEE 802.15IEEE 802.15

Not addressed by IEEE 802.11 IEEE 802.15 Family

March 2000


doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/098r0

Submission

Bluetooth Letter of IntentBluetooth Letter of Intent(99032r0P802-15_Bluetooth-Letter-Of-Intent-Review.doc)(99032r0P802-15_Bluetooth-Letter-Of-Intent-Review.doc)

• “With respect to any 802.15 extensions (beyond Bluetooth 1.0 specification), the Bluetooth SIG promoters are prepared to grant similar licenses ONLY IF such extensions do not break interoperability with existing Bluetooth 1.0 certified radios andand are approved in writing by the Bluetooth SIG.”

Dated: July 15, 1999

James Kardach

Bluetooth SIG Chairman

March 2000


doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/098r0

Submission

High Rate PAR

As previously mentioned in our original submission letter, on the condition that the IEEE 802.15 standardis:

a) 100% compatible with the Bluetooth 1.0 Foundation Specification (as measured by a certifiedBluetooth test house)

b) Maintains and requires inclusion of Bluetooth testing interfaces as described in the currentBluetooth specification (to allow interoperability testing between Bluetooth and 802.15compliant solutions)

c) Any 802.15 extensions (beyond Bluetooth 1.0 specification) must not break interoperabilitywith existing Bluetooth 1.0 certified radios and be approved by the Bluetooth SIG Promoters

doc.: ieee 802.15-00/098r0 submission march 2000 robert f. heile, gteslide 1 802.15 thursday report...

Documents