dosage form factors influencing bioavailability...
TRANSCRIPT
BiopharmaceuticsDosage form factors influencing bioavailability
Lec:5
Ali Y Ali BSc Pharmacy
MSc Industrial Pharmaceutical Sciences
Dept. of Pharmaceutics School of Pharmacy
University of Sulaimani16/12/2019 1
Biopharmaceutics Physicochemical
properties
Dosage form Route of
Administration
Bioavailability(Rate & Extent)
2
Overview
• Dosage form factors influencing bioavailability– Type of dosage form
– Aqueous solutions and suspensions– Capsules; liquid- and powder-filled– Tablets; uncoated, coated and enteric-coated
– Excipients– Diluents– Surfactants– Lubricants– Disintegrants– Viscosity-enhancing agents
– Biopharmaceutical classification scheme
3
Introduction
• Bioavailability of drug in a dosage form can be affected by :– Formulation (the contents)– Production
• Dosage forms are designed and changed to influence of the release and absorption of drugs.
4
Aqueoussolution
Aqueoussuspension
Immediaterelease
solid dosageform
Suspension offine particles
of drug inGI fluids
Aggregateor granules
Solution ofdrug in GI
fluids
Possible steps between administration andappearance of drug in SOLUTION in GI fluids
Disintegration
Deaggregation
Precipitation
Dissolution Absorption
Dissolution
5
Aqueous Solution
• Drugs soluble and stable in the aqueous solution
• Formulation as solution eliminates the dissolution step in vivo in the absorption process.
6
Aqueous Solution
• Poorly soluble drugs– Cosolvency – Complex formation
• Dilution by GI fluids might lead to precipitation
• Exposure of salt of acidic drug to the acidic environment of the stomach also precipitates the drug as it will be in the free from.
7
• The fine nature of the precipitate allows fast redissolution of the drug particles compared to other dosage formsa) Aqueous suspension b) Hard gelatin capsule and tablet
8
Formulation factors of Aqueous Solution affecting bioavailability
1. Chemical stability:– Dosage form and GIT
2. Complexation: drug-excipints – Increase aqueous solubility – Increase viscosity of the dosage form
3. Solubilisation– Incorporation into micelles in order to increase the
aqueous solubility 4. Viscosity of the dosage form
– Viscosity enhancing agents
9
Aqueous Suspension
• Insoluble and poorly soluble drugs • Dissolution rate limited
10
Particle size & effective surface area of dispersed drug
• If increase total surface area then increase dissolution rate
• For a given mass of drug, smaller particles have a higher effective surface area
• If absorption of drug is dissolution-rate limited, then increase absorption by decreasing particle size
11
Aqueous suspensions: factors affecting bioavailability
1. Particle size and effective surface area of dispersed drug
2. Crystal form of drug• Amorphous vs. crystalline• Novobiocin – antibiotic no longer in BNF
– Rapidly dissolving amorphous form readily absorbed form an aqueous suspension. Crystalline is inactive
• Polymorph:– e.g. chloramphenicol palmitate suspension A is stable
polymorph, B is metastable. – more rapid dissolution of B the increased bioavailability– because Dissolution of A so slow effectively inactive 12
Aqueous suspensions: factors affecting bioavailability
4. Possible complexation with excipient– Complexation to reduce bioavailability – drug and
viscosity enhancing agent e.g. carboxymethylcellulose and amfetamine
5. Inclusion of surfactant as wetting, flocculating or deflocculating agent
6. Viscosity13
Viscosity-enhancing agents and drug absorption
• Liquid dosage forms improve1. Palatability 2. Ease of pouring 3. Rate of sedimentation of the dispersed particles
14
Viscosity-enhancing agents and drug absorption
1. Complex formation1. Complexation to reduce bioavailability
• e.g. carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) and amphetamine
2. Increase viscosity of GI contents1. Decreased dissolution rate of solid particles2. Decreased rate of diffusion of drug molecules
15
Liquid filled capsules
• Liquid can be filled into hard or soft gelatincapsules
• Advantages:1. Unit dosage form 2. Rapid absorption
• Dissolved • Suspended
16
Liquid filled capsules
• Non-aqueous vehicles1. Water miscible (hydrophilic)
• Polyethylene glycols (PEGs)• Non-ionic surfactants (polysorbate-80)
2. Water immiscible (lipophilic)• Vegetable oils (digestible or non-digestible)
• Release of contents:– Dissolution and splitting of the shell
17
Types of Vehicle of Liquid filled capsules
1. Water miscible vehicle: – Solution or suspension– disperses and/or dissolves in GIT, releasing the drug as
either suspension or solution, respectively.– Allows rapid absorption
2. Water Immiscible: – Solution or suspension– Release of the drug from the dosage form followed by
dispersion • Solution, emulsion, suspension
18
Water Immiscible• Water immiscible (lipophilic):
a) Vehicle is digestible oil and drug is highly soluble in the vehicle:
• In GIT it is possible that the drug remain in solution in the dispersed oil phase and absorbed along with the oil droplet, by fat absorption mechanisms
19
Water Immiscible
b) Drug is less soluble in the oily vehicle or the drug is dissolved in the non-digestible oil:
– The drug must partition from the oily phase or into the aqueous GI fluids
– Absorption depends on this partition– Increase interfacial (oil/aqueous) will increase
dissolution rate
20
Suspension
• Suspension in oily phase :– Dissolution in the vehicle – Diffusion to the oil/aqueous interface – Partition across the interface
21
Poorly soluble drugs with improved bioavailability
• Digoxin:– Formulated as soft gelatin showed faster absorption
compared to tablets
• Saquinavir– Antiviral – Peptidomimetic– Soft glatin (fortovase) showed improvement in
bioavailability compared to hard gelatin powder filled 22
Liquid-filled capsules: factors affecting bioavailability
1. Solubility of drug in vehicle (and GI fluids)
2. Particle size of drug (if suspended in vehicle)
3. Nature of vehicle (hydrophilic or lipohilic)
4. Inclusion of surfactant
5. Inclusion of suspending agent
6. Complexation23
Powder-filled Capsules• Dissolution of hard gelatin shell
• Penetration of GI fluids into encapsulated mass
• excipients and packing density important
• Dispersion of encapsulated mass in GI fluids
• Dissolution of dispersed drug particles24
Only hydrophobic drug particles Hydrophobic drug particlesHydrophilic diluent particles
Shell dissolves
25
Powder-filled capsules: factors affecting bioavailability
1. Surface area and particle size of drug2. Use of salt form3. Crystal form of drug4. Chemical stability of drug5. Composition and properties of capsule shell
(including enteric capsules)6. Interactions between capsule shell and
contents7. Complexation 26
Phenytoin Capsules
• Occurred in Australia in the late 1960s
• A capsule was reformulated that contained phenytoin
• The diluent used was changed from calcium sulfate to lactose
27
Phenytoin Capsules
• In the months following this change, there was reports of side-effects similar to overdosing of product
• It was demonstrated that the change had had a significant effect on the bioavailability of phenytoin
28
Tablets
1. Uncoated 2. Coated ( enteric-coated)
• The most widely used dosage form
• Characterised by large reduction in the surface area owing to the production methods used – Granulation – Compaction
29
Tablet
• Reduction in the surface area can be solved by formulation, this is by addition of excipientsthat serve to increase surface area upon administration
30
?
Tablet Granules Fineparticles
Drug insolution
Stomach
Smallintestine
Tran
sit
ABSORPTION
Release and absorption of a drug from a tablet
?
?
?
Fine suspension 31
Uncoated tablets: factors affecting bioavailability of a poorly soluble drug
1. Physicochemical properties of liberated drug particles in GI fluids
2. Nature and quantity of excipients• Diluent, binder, disintegrant, lubricant, wetting agent
3. Drug-excipient interactions4. Manufacturing factors
• Granule size, compaction pressure and speed
5. Storage and age of tablet
32
Coated tablets
• Coating presents physical barrier between tablet core and GI fluids
• Problems of uncoated tablets• PLUS• Problems of coating
• Coating must dissolve/disrupt
33
Types of coating
1. Poorly water-soluble coating– Can delay and or reduce rate of drug release
• Shellac, cellulose acetate phthalate (CAP), ethylcellulose (EC)
2. Water-soluble coating– No significant effect on drug release
• Hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC)
34
Enteric-coated tablets
• Resists low pH of gastric fluids• Dissolves at higher pH of duodenal fluids (pH
5)
• Coatings include:• Cellulose acetate phthalate CAP• Hydroxypropyl methylcellulose phthalate • Copolymers of methacrylic acid and their esters• Poly vinyl acetate phthalate PVAP
35
36
Enteric-coated tablets
Enteric coating
• Delays drug release to improve bioavailability• Can protect stomach
• Types – EC tablet (monolith)
– Onset of action dependent on gastric emptying time
– EC granules or pellets (< 1 mm)– Gradual release from stomach with liquids
37
Excipients
• Excipients are added to the formulation in order to facilitate the preparation, patient acceptability and functioning of the dosage form as a drug delivery system.
38
Diluents
• Increased incidence of phenytoin intoxication in Australia from phenytoin ??
• Changing the diluent in the capsules from calcium sulphate dihydrate to lactose.
• This is because of forming non absorbable complex between Ca-phenytoin
39
Surfactants
• Emulsifying agent• Solubilising agent • Suspension stabilisers • Wetting agent
• Inert? – Increase– Decrease – No effect
40
Surfactants
• Inhibition of absorption :– drugs normally soluble in
the GIT fluids:presence of surfactants in micellar concentration decrease absorption by incorporation of the drug in the micelles
41
Surfactants
• Increase absorption:– Poorly soluble drugs, increase dissolution by
solubilisation (Cs), this leads to rapid absorption – Disrupting biological membranes increases
membrane permeability
42
Lubricants
• Added to reduce friction between solid particles and metal parts of machinery in the manufacturing of solid dosage forms
• Hydrophobic
• Mg stearate: retard penetration of GI fluids
43
• How we solve it ?– Overcome
• Wetting agent • Hydrophilic diluent
– Decrease Mg stearate content
44
• Mg sterate as lubricant
45
Disintegrants
• Break up tablet capsules and granules into primary particles
• Disintegration failures – Incomplete absorption – Delay in onset
• Tolbutamide
46
Biopharmaceutical Classification Scheme
Permeability
SolubilityClass I
High solubilityHigh permeability
Class IILow solubility
High permeability
Class IVLow solubility
Low permeability
Class IIIHigh solubility
Low permeability
47
Biopharmaceutical Classification Scheme
• Considers aqueous solubility (Dose and Solubillity) and permeability via oral route of delivery (90%)
• Class I – high solubility, high permeability– rapid absorption, good bioavailability
• e.g. propanolol, metaprolol
• Class II – low solubility, high permeability– drug controls absorption; potential for particle size effects
on bioavailability• e.g. ketoprofen, carbamazepine
48
Biopharmaceutical Classification Scheme
• Class III - high solubility, low permeability– drug dissolves rapidly but poorly absorbed– require rapid drug release to maximise absorption
• e.g. ranitidine, atenolol
• Class IV - low solubility, low permeability– challenging molecules, likely to exhibit low bioavailability
• e.g. hydrochlorothiazide, ``
• option to increase permeability - modify drugs as ‘prodrugs’
49
Further Readings
• Shargel L, Yu AB, (Eds.), Applied Biopharmaceutics and Pharmacokinetics.
• Aulton's Pharmaceutics: The Design andManufacture of Medicines, M.E.Aulton, Churchill Livingstone, 2007.
50
Thank You
51