download 3.12 mb

Safeguards Monitoring Report Project No. 42248-013 Annual Report April 2014

2763-BAN (SF): Second Chittagong Hill Tracts Rural

Development Project

Prepared by Mohammad Nurul Islam & Kh. Khairul Matin, Consultants Safeguard and Quality

Monitoring Cell, for the Asian Development Bank.

This social and environmental monitoring report is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.

i

Safeguard & Quality Monitoring Report №2

March-April 2014

Prepared by Mohammad Nurul Islam & Kh. Khairul Matin, Consultants

Safeguard and Quality Monitoring Cell

ii

To

Ms. Satoko Tanaka Senior Transport Specialist Bangladesh Resident Mission Plot E-31, Sher-e-Bangla Nagar Dhaka 1207, Bangladesh

Subject: Loan 2763-BAN: Second Chittagong Hill Tracts Rural Development Project

- Safeguards Quality Monitoring Report № 2

Dear Ms. Tanaka, With reference to the above, this is to inform you that the consultants of the Safeguard and Quality Monitoring Cell (SQMC) have prepared a report based on their inputs provided to the project from 02 March to 30 April 2014 and is sent herewith. Your comments will be appreciated.

Sincerely yours

Mohammad Nurul Islam Environmental Engineer (Consultant) Safeguard and Quality Monitoring Cell

E-mail: [email protected]

CC:

1. Mr. Sukrity Ranjann Chakma (ndc), Project Director (PMO), Second Chittagong HillTracts Rural Development Project, Rangamati. (E-mail: [email protected])

2. Mr. Swapon Kumar Das, Project Director (PIO), CHTRDP-II, LGED Bhaban, Dhaka. (E-mail: [email protected])

3. Kh. Khairul Matin, Social Safeguard Specialist (Consultant), SQMC, CHTDDP-II. (E-mail: [email protected])

4. Mr. J.A.M. Bert Van Ommen, Team Leader, PIC, CHTRDP-II, Rangamati. (E-mail: [email protected])

5. Mr. Ahmed Newaz, Deputy Team Leader, PIC, CHTRDP-II, Rangamati. (E-mail: [email protected])

6. Mr. Dayal Kumar Chakma, National Consultant/Project Coordinator (E-mail: [email protected])

Date: 17 July 2014

The People’s Republic of Bangladesh & Asian Development Bank Second Chittagong Hill Tracts Rural Development Project

Loan № 2763-BAN, Project № 42248-013

mailto:[email protected]

iii

ABBREVIATIONS

ADB – Asian Development Bank

CHT – Chittagong Hill Tracts

CHTDB – Chittagong Hill Tracts Development Board

CHTRC – Chittagong Hill Tracts Regional Council

CHTDF – Chittagong Hill Tracts Development Facility

CHTRDP-I – Chittagong Hill Tracts Rural Development Project

CHTRDP-II – Second Chittagong Hill Tracts Rural Development Project

CI – Community Infrastructure

DPD – Deputy Project Director

DPMO – District Project Management Office

DPP – Development Project Proforma

CPTU – Central Procurement Technical Unit

GC – Growth Centre

GoB – Government of Bangladesh

HBB – Herring Bone Bond

HDC – Hill District Council

IEE – Initial Environmental Examination

IP – Indigenous People

IPP – Indigenous People Plan

LAR – Land Acquisition and Resettlement

LARF – Land Acquisition and Resettlement Framework

LCS – Labour Contracting Society

LGED – Local Government Engineering Department

HQ – Headquarters

MAD – Micro Agribusiness Development

MoCHTA – Ministry of Chittagong Hill Tracts Affairs

NGO – Nongovernment Organization

O&M – Operation and Maintenance

PAM – Project Administration Manual

PIC – Project Implementation Consultants

PD – Project Director

PMO – Project Management Office

RCC – Reinforced Cement Concrete

SDS – Survey, Design and Supervision

SQMC – Safeguards and Quality Monitoring Cell

SPS – Safeguard Policy Statement

UNDP – United Nations Development Programme

UP – Union Parishad

XEN – Executive Engineer

1

Executive Summary

This second report is presented on Safeguards and Quality Monitoring comprising involuntary resettlement, gender mainstreaming, indigenous people, environmental safeguards, quality of construction works and reviewing procurement process under the Second Chittagong Hill Tracts Rural Development Project (CHTRDP-II). The reporting period is from 2 March to 30 April 2014.

There were no significant environmental and social impacts observed during the reporting period of the ongoing implementation of above Project.

PMO has been established with all of the required staff. The Deputy Project Directors along with support staff are on board in three hill districts. But deployment of the Non-governmental Organizations for Micro Agro-business Development (MAD) and Community Infrastructure (CI) component are not yet completed. Only Resettlement NGO for implementation of the Resettlement Plans has been deployed. A Resettlement Specialist has been deployed by the PIC. One Training Specialist has also been recruited by the PIC; both of them are working now in the project.

LGED implements the rural roads component of CHTRDP-II with LGED staff working at district and upazilas within the project area including 27 incremental project staff. During discussion with LGED officials it was learnt that LGED recruited/deployed 19 project staff out of 27 and reaming 8 project staff (2 Assistant Engineer and 6 Sub-Assistant Engineers) yet to be recruited/deployed.

Progress of the project implementation is slow due to a slow start up and delays due to late deployment of PIC, social mobilization NGOs, and resettlement NGO. Commencement of civil works for the community infrastructure component is progressing; but civil works of rural road component except functional building could not be started due to delays of the preparation and implementation of LARP. Acceleration is necessary for both preparation and implementation with the efforts of PMO, DPMO, PIC, and NGOs.

Raikhali GC Ferry Ghat-Rajastholi HQ via Mitingachari Upazila Road located in Kaptai Upazial under Rangamati District needs protection of 275 m river bank, which was eroded by the Karnaphuli River. Public and private utilities need to be relocated for the bank protection. The relocation of utilities and bank protection works are highly costly. Bangladesh Water Development Board (BWDB) has implemented some portion of bank protection works near the same location. MoCHTA may request BWDB to undertake the protection of 275 m river bank.

About 50% bridge (over Sangu River on Raicha-Goaliakhola) and its one approach road are outside of the jurisdiction of CHT Region. LGED’s Chief Engineer has agreed to allocate money from GoB fund for land acquisition and construction of approach road, which is within the jurisdiction of Chittagong District.

LGED has awarded civil works for the extension of its three existing LGED’s district functional buildings in Rangamati, Banderban and Khagrachari. Financial progress of these buildings was 38% as of 30 April 2014. Construction works are now in progress. The construction cost of the building in Banderban has increased about 35% of the original contract value due to unsuitable subsoil condition identified during boring works. ADB’s concurrence on contract variation is essential.

Toilet is provided for the use of ladies; but ramp and toilet, which are essential for disable persons, were not provided. LGED agreed to provide facilities for disable persons. 48 trees were removed for the construction of three LGED’s functional buildings. The Project has adopted a ten for one tree replacement policy. According to this policy, 480 plants need to be planted.

Second Chittagong Hill Tracts Rural Development Project Safeguards and Quality Monitoring Report

2

DPMOs have completed some works of CI component. It was observed that restrictions in the tender notice were imposed - “Any bid less than below 5% or more than above 5% of the estimated cost will be treated as informal. A lottery may take place the same lowest rate is quoted by more than one bidder.” These restrictions contradict ADB’s policy stated in the PAM.

Some persons/families will be seriously affected by the acquisition of lands to widen road crest for the upgradation of upazial and union roads. As the population density and the volume of traffic plying on the upazila and union roads of the CHT area are significantly smaller than that similar category of roads in the plain areas of Bangladesh the crest width of upazila road may be reduced from 7.3m (24ft) to 5.5m (18ft) by reducing the earthen shoulder from 3.7m (12ft=2x6ft) to 1.8m (6ft=2x3ft) keeping pavement width 3.7m (12ft). Similarly, the crest width of union road may be reduced from 5.5m (18ft) to 4.6m (15ft) by reducing the earthen shoulder from 2.5m (8ft=2x4ft) to 1.6m (5ft=2x2.5ft) keeping pavement width 3.0m (10ft). Extra crest width needs be added for the provision of drain, parapet and top of retaining wall where requires.

Upgradation of upazila roads, union roads, village access roads, construction of market shed and other civil works will consume huge numbers of bricks. To encourage brick manufacturers burning bricks with coal, only coal burnt bricks should be used in ADB financed civil works.

LGED obtained environmental clearance for Rural Roads Components of CHTRDP-II from the Department of Environment, Bangladesh.

To avoid overlapping of project works among CHTDB, LGED and three Hill District Councils, a coordination committee needs to be formed headed by Chairman/Vice-Chairman of CHTDB as convenor. Other members of the committee may be LGED Executive Engineers, CHTDB Executive Engineers, HDC Executive Engineers, Deputy Project Directors (DPMO) of the three hill districts. Senior Planning Officer of CHTDB may be included as member-secretary of the committee. The committee will meet twice a year and discuss their programme to avoid overlapping.

Lack of cooperation and coordination exists between Project Director (PMO) including PIC with Project Director (Rural Roads). This situation should be improved for sake of smooth implementation of the project. Project Director and Deputy Project Director (Rural Roads) alternately should spend 10 to 15 days per month in the project area to accelerate project implementation.

_______

4

I. INTRODUCTION

1. The Second Chittagong Hill Tracts Rural Development Project (CHTRDP-II) was approved by Asian Development Bank (ADB) in July 2011 for an amount of $55.00 million from ADB’s Special Funds. The Project cost is $70.80 million of which $14.40 million is Government of Bangladesh (GoB) financing and the remainder from beneficiary’s contributions. The Loan Agreement was signed between the GOB and the ADB on 2 October 2011 and became effect on 13 December 2011. The project implementation period is December 2011 - December 2018.

2. The Project impact is to increase rural household incomes in subproject areas in Chittagong Hill Tracts (CHT) and its outcome increased income-generating opportunities for people in subproject areas. There are five main outputs: (i) institutional development and capacity building, (ii) upgraded rural roads (166 km), (iii) maintenance of community infrastructure (in 600 villages), (iv) sustainable micro agribusiness development (MAD) in 9 sub-districts (upazilas), and (v) project management.

3. As a part of project management support, consultants of the safeguards and quality monitoring cell (SQMC) provide inputs on intermittent basis to monitor quality of construction works and compliances with social and environmental safeguards. This report covers the inputs1 of SQMC consultants for the duration of 02 March to 30 April 2014.

4. During the period of services in 2014 (March-April 2014), the SQMC consultants visited completed, ongoing and proposed subprojects and met stakeholders of CHTRDP-II and held meeting with Honorable Chairman of CHTRC, Project Director (PMO), Team Leader (PIC) including key team members, Deputy Project Directors (DPMO) of Rangamati, Bandarban & Khagrachari districts and Executive Engineers (LGED) of Rangamati, Bandarban & Khagrachar districts, Chief Implementation (UNDP-CHTDF). The SQMC consultant also met Secretary (MoCHTA), Chief Engineer (LGED), Vice Chairman (CHTDB), Project Director (Rural Roads) including in-house Consultants. The list of people met is shown in Appendix-B.

II. SUBPROJECT VISIT

1. Rural Roads and Other LGED Component

5. There were differences of opinions between LGED and PIC for upgradation of four roads, which were approved by the CHT Regional Council for upgradation in the financial year 2013-2014. PIC proposes to defer implementation of four roads2 as the condition of these roads are still in reasonably good condition and give priority to roads that are really needed. On other hand, LGED’s argument is that as these are damaged roads and are within the CHT Regional Council approved list, LGED has taken up for upgradation in the financial year 2013-2014; LGED has completed survey, plan, design and cost estimates engaging consultants, which consumed project money and time. If these roads are dropped, LGED will not be able to start implementation of road works within this financial year and the progresses of project works will hamper. The SQMC consultants visited ten proposed roads

1 This report covers the inputs of Mohammad Nurul Islam (Environmental Engineer) from 02 March – 30 April

March 2014 and of Kh. Khairul Matin (Social Safeguards Specialist) from 01-30 April 2014.

2 PIC’s proposed four roads are (i) Longadu-Maima Mukh GC road under Langadu Upazila of Rangamati, (ii)

Panchari GC- Bhaibonchara GC via Shamtipur Arunya Kutir road under Panchari Upazila of Khagrachari, (iii) Garitana GC-Batnatali Union HQ road via Chailyatali road (Mohalchari part) under Manikchari Upazial of Khagrachari, and (iv) Sindukchari Union HQ – Dullahtali road (Mohalchari part)under Mohalchari Upazila of Khagrachari.

Second Chittagong Hill Tracts Rural Development Project Safeguards and Quality Monitoring Cell

5

and one bridge site including these four roads to assist the PMO for taking appropriate decision.

(i) Panchari GC - Bhaibonchara GC via Shantipur Arena Kutir Upazial Road

6. This road is located in Panchari Upazial under Khagarachari District. Total length of the road is 10.62 km, out of which 5.07 km is brick pavement (Ch 00 to 5+070), bituminous carpeting is 4.49 km (Ch: 5+070 to 9+558) and earthen is 1.06 km (Ch: 9+558 to 10+618). The bituminous carpeting 4.49 km is in good condition; reaming 6.13 km needs to be upgraded to all weather bituminous carpeting including 1.06 km of earthen road.

LGED has proposed to upgrade 5.07 km of brick pavement to all weather bituminous

carpeting including 16.35 m of 19 UBDs, 275 m of L-Drain, 30 m of RCC retaining wall,

6.80m of Tie Retaining Wall, 402 m of irrigation cannel, 12 nos (180 m) of outfall drains and

65 m of brick masonry toe wall.

7. 402 m of irrigation cannel will be dismantled to expand the crest with of road. Moreover, a total 375 m (Ch: 1+330 to 1+630, and 2+515 to 2+590) of existing road alignment needs to be shifted to protect erosion by the adjacent Chengi River and to straighten the existing zigzag bridge approaches.

8. LGED did not propose development of 1.06 km (Ch: 9+558 to 10+618) earthen road to all weather road due to DPP road length limitation. This portion of road needs to be developed to complete a road network with Panchari-Khagrachari road to serve more people of this subproject area.

9. The Social Safeguard Specialist along with Executive Engineer (LGED, Khagrachari), Deputy Team Leader (PIC) and in house consultants visited the project site on 25 April 2014 to consult the potential affected people and find alternatives to avoid or minimize private land acquisition and adverse impacts due to the project. During visit to the field, the SQMC, PIC and LGED were agreed to reduce some portion of the private land acquisition and physical displacement. There was a piece of land in between proposed right of way and existing road which is seemed unviable. After discussion with the land owners and LGED officials, the said unviable land was incorporated in the acquisition proposal. People expressed their views in

6

favour of the project and requested to avoid or minimize acquisition expected quick implementation.

10. In consultation with the CHT Regional Council, PD (PMO) and PIC, LGED has revised the proposal including inclusion of earthen road for development and shifting a portion of road to avoid encroachment of a Buddhist shrine’s land. The revised road length is 10.03 km, out of which 4.35 km is brick pavement (Ch 00 to 4+350), bituminous carpeting is 4.62 km (Ch: 4+350 to 8+966) and earthen is 1.03 km (Ch: 8+966 to 10+030). Now 5.38 km of road will be developed including construction of drains, retaining walls, toe walls and irrigation cannels under this project excluding 4.62 km of bituminous carpeting, which is in good condition.

(ii) Garitana GC-Batnatali Union H/Q Road via Jogyachola Union Road

11. This road is located in Manikchari Upazial under Khagrachari District. Total length of the road is 15.55 km, out of which 9.17 km BC, 4.82 km HBB and 1.56 earthen road including 0.29 km bride approach and missing of HBB. The BC portion of the road is in good condition and major portion of HBB is damaged and uneven. LGED has proposed upgradation of 6.37 km existing HBB and earthen road to BC including 5 box culvers (17.50 m), 8 U-drains (6.45m), L-drains (8560m), RCC retaining wall (215 m), tie retaining wall (40 m), 19 out fall drains (152 m). Considering very high cost escalation in construction materials, CHT Regional Council has deferred the road to upgrade for the time being. If fund permit, at least earthen portion 1.38 km road may be upgraded to HBB to complete the road network to all weather surfacing.

(iii) Sindukchari Union HQ-Dullahtali GC via Chailyatali Union Road

12. This road is located in Mahalchari Upazial under Khagrachari District. Total length of the road is 9.32 km. The road surface consists 7.05 km BC, 1.82 km HBB brick pavement and 0.45 km earthen. About 2.46 km out of 7.05 km BC and 1.82 km of HBB brick pavement are not in good condition. LGED has proposed 4.28 km to upgrade the existing road surface to BC including 2.46 km BC with overlaying, construction of 105 m cause way, 4 bridges

7

(136 m), 8 box culverts (13.5 m), 8 U-drains (15.10 m), 3.40 km L-drains and retaining walls (169 m). After discussion with PMO, PIC and LGED, CHT Regional Council agreed to upgrade this road including ancillary works.

(iv) Longadu-Maina Mukh GC Upazial road

13. This road is located in Longadu Upazial under Rangamati District. Total length of the road is 4.72 km, out of which 3.89 km is herring bone bond (HBB) brick pavement, 0.52 km is bituminous carpeting (BC) and 0.31 km is cement concrete (CC). Local people informed that HBB works had been completed 10-12 years before. Present condition of the road is 2.22 km of HBB fully damaged; depression and edge failure are noticed in 1.91 km HBB and 0.31 km CC road; and 0.52 km BC and 0.38 km HBB in three sections are in good condition. This road does not cross cantonment; but runs adjacent to a cantonment. Upazila Engineer informed that previous GOC of the cantonment request LGED to upgrade some portion of road, which is made a loop inside the cantonment and linked the proposed road. LGED has proposed upgrading of the existing HBB road to BC; but provision of HBB has been made in PAM and DPP. Now the CHT Regional Council has deferred the road to upgrade for the time being. If this road is taken up for upgradation to BC under this Project, prior approval of ADB and revision of DPP will be required.

(v) Raikhali GC Ferry Ghat-Rajastholi HQ via Mitingachari Upazila Road

14. This road is located in Kaptai Upazial under Rangamati District. Total length of the road is 17.50 km, out of which 2.55 km (Ch 00 to 2+550) is BC and HBB brick pavement in good condition, and 14.95 km (Ch 2+550 to 17+500) is earthen surface. CHTDB has undertaken 9.51 km (Ch 7+990 to 17+500) for upgrading to HBB brick pavement. LGED has proposed 5.44 km (Ch 2+550 to 7+990) for upgrading to HBB brick pavement including the construction of 102 m bridge/culvert, 6,857 m roadside drains, 170 m outfall drains, 20 m RCC retaining wall, 8 m causeway, 50 m brick guide wall and protection of 275 m river bank, which was eroded by the Karnaphuli River. Public and private utilities need to be relocated for the bank protection. The relocation of utilities and bank protection works are highly costly. Bangladesh Water Development Board (BWDB) has implemented some portion of bank

8

protection works near the same location. MoCHTA may request BWDB to undertake the protection of 275 m river bank. After discussion with PMO, PIC and LGED, CHT Regional Council agreed for upgrading 5.44 km (Ch 2+550 to 7+990) road to HBB brick pavement including ancillary works, but excluding the bank protection works.

(vi) Betbunia Chairy Bazar-Laxmichari Upazila Road via Barmachari

15. This road is located in Kawkhali Upazial under Rangamati District. Total length of the road is 25.10 km, out of which 8.10 km (Ch 00 to 8+100) is HBB brick pavement in good condition, and reaming 17.00 km (Ch 8+100 to 25+100) is earthen surface. LGED has proposed 6.01 km (Ch 8+100 to 14+110) for upgrading to HBB brick pavement including the construction of 2 bridges (67 m), 19 culverts (41.50 m), 8 U-drains (6.85 m), road side L-drains (4,670 m), RCC retaining wall (130 m), cross fall basin (250 m), and brick masonry toe wall (120 m). After discussion with PMO, PIC and LGED, CHT Regional Council agreed for upgrading 6.01 km (Ch 2+550 to 7+990) road to HBB brick pavement including ancillary works.

(vii) Naikhongchari-Chakdhala Bazar-Dakkin Chakdhala Upazila Road

16. This road is located in Naikhongchari Upazial under Babdarban District stating from Chakdhala Bazar to Myanmar border. Total length of the road is 11.40 km, out of which 6.53 km is BC, 2.53 km is HBB brick pavement and 2.34 km is earthen surface. About 5 km road needs to be upgraded to BC including construction of 182 m bride and culverts.

17. The Project Director and SQMC consultants held consultation meetings with local people (mostly indigenous people) and sought their opinion and necessity of development of the road. It is known from the local people that development of this road will bring lots of opportunities in transportation of goods and in terms of communication with Upazila Head Quarter.

18. After discussion with PMO, PIC and LGED, CHT Regional Council agreed to upgrade this road to BC including ancillary works. Survey, planning and design works are in progress.

9

(viii) Naikhonchari –Tumbru Upazila Road

19. This road is located in Naikhongchari Upazial under Babdarban District starting from Naikhongchari Upazial HQ to Tumbru GC. Total length of the road is 34.46 km, out of which 21.36 km is BC, 3.00 km is HBB brick pavement and 10.10 km is earthen surface. Due to missing link (about 13 km) people are to travel 57 km road (following Chttagong-Cox’s Bazar Road) to reach Tumbru from Naikhangsori.

20. The Project Director and SQMC & PIC consultants held consultation meetings with local people (mostly indigenous people) and sought their opinion and necessity of development of the road. It is known from the local people that development of this road will bring lots of opportunities in transportation of goods and in terms of communication with Upazila Head Quarter.

21. After discussion with PMO, PIC and LGED, CHT Regional Council agreed to upgrade this road to BC including ancillary works. Survey, planning and design works are in progress.

(ix) Bridge over Sangu River on Raicha-Goaliakhola Union Road

22. Raicha-Goaliakhola Road is located in Sadar Upazila of Bandarban Distinct starting from Raicha GC and ends at the bank of Sangu River in Goaliakhola village. Total lenth of the road is about 7 km, which was upgraded to BC from ADB financed CHTRDP-I. LGED has proposed to construct a 231m long pre-stressed concrete girder bridge over Sangu River on Raicha-Goaliakhola to connect Kuhalong Union road under Bandarban District and RHD road under Chittagong District.

23. The SQMC Consultants visited the proposed bridge location more than twice.

10

Consultation meetings with affected people and other stakeholders especially indigenous people were held on 18 April 2014 during field visit. Initially the alignment was drawn in the downstream of the existing road approach which caused displacement of some residential and commercial premises at Bandarban and Chittagong end. It was observed during field visit of the SQMC and PIC that the alignment may be shifted towards upstream by 30-35 meter that will cause no displacement at any of the sides. The issue was brought into the notice of the Project Directors and decision was taken to revisit the site and find alternative to avoid and to minimize displacement. Finally the Safeguard Specialist of SQMC and Executive Engineer of LGED (Bandarban) along with in house consultant and concerned Upazila Engineers visited the site on 30 April 2014. They have visited both ends of the proposed bridge location and decided to shift the alignment towards upstream. This will avoid displacement of residential households in both ends. Only some commercial premises will be displaced. The RNGO was requested to conduct census and inventory of losses surveys for the potential displaced commercial structures and other land owners for preparation of Resettlement Plan.

24. It is known from the local people that if the bridge is constructed it will bring lots of opportunities in transportation of goods and in terms of communication for the rural people of Bandarban. About 50% bridge and its one approach road are outside of the jurisdiction of CHT Region. LGED’s Chief Engineer has agreed to allocate money from GoB fund for land acquisition and construction of approach road, which is within the jurisdiction of Chittagong District.

25. After discussion with PMO, PIC and LGED, CHT Regional Council agreed to construct the bride if LGED allocate money for land acquisition and construction of approach road is within the jurisdiction of Chittagong District and provided that if ADB agrees for such arrangement. Design and cost estimate of the bridge are in progress.

(x) Construction of LGED’s Functional Buildings (Extension) 26. The plan, design and estimates for the extension of three functional buildings with six-storied foundation have been prepared by the in-house individual consultants for LGED district offices under the Project area. These plan, design and estimates have been reviewed by the PIC and concurred by the PMO. Due to fund constraint only ground floor is being constructed utilising project fund. The SQMC consultant visited three ongoing construction works of LGED Functional Buildings at Rangamati, Banderban and Khagrachari.

27. SQMC consultant reviewed plan of the extension of three functional buildings. Toilet provided for the use of ladies; but ramp and toilet, which are for disable persons, were not provided. LGED agreed to provide facilities for disable persons.

(a) Functional Building at Rangamati

28. Procurement Process: Tender was invited on 30 April 2013 and published in two daily national news papers on 3 May 2013 and CPTU website on 2 May 2013. Five (5) bids were received on 6 May 2013. All bids were evaluated by a bid evaluation committee3. On the recommendation of the bid evaluation committee, the lowest bidder – M/S Jalalabad Contruction, Rangamai approved by Chief Engineer LGED and concurred by ADB. LGED followed the national competitive bidding procedures set forth for the National Open Tendering Method in the GOB’s Public Procurement Rules, 2008 (as updated and issued pursuant to the Bangladesh Public Procurement Act, 2006). The procurement process seems to be transparent.

3 Bid evaluation committee comprises Senior Assistant Engineer (LGED district office), Sub-Divisional

Engineer (Bangladesh Water Development Board), Sub-Divisional Engineer (Roads and Highways Department), Upazila Engineer (Sadar Upazila) and Sub-Assistant Engineer (LGED district office). The bid evaluation committee applies for all civil works implemented by LGED at district level.

11

29. The estimated cost of the building (ground floor) is Tk 12,991,954.00 and the contract value of the work is Tk 12,269,406.57, which is 5.56% less than the estimated value. Contract agreement was signed on 18 August 2013 and the work will be completed within 20 Aught 2014. Financial progress of the work as of 12 April 2014 was 32.92%. Construction of the functional building is in progress.

30. Quality of work: Piles works in foundation have been been completed. 16 m long and 500 mm diameter 7 piles and 19 m long and 500 mm diameter 28 piles have been used in foundation. Materials such as cement, sand, stone chips, MS rod were tested and are found acceptable. Test result is shown in Table-1 of Appendix–B.

12

31. Environment Safeguards: 17 trees were removed from the LGED district office campus for the construction of functional building. The Project has adopted a ten for one tree replacement policy. According to this policy, 170 plants need to be planted.

(b) Functional Building at Khagrachari

32. Procurement Process: Tender was invited on 02 May 2013 and published in two daily national news papers (New Nation on 3 May 2013 and Bhorer Kagoj on 4 May 2013) and CPTU website on 6 May 2013 and LGED website on 6 May 2013. Five (5) bids were received on 6 June 2013. All bids were evaluated by the bid evaluation committee. On the recommendation of the bid evaluation committee, the lowest bidder – M/S Rip Enterprise, Khagrachari approved by Chief Engineer LGED and concurred by ADB. LGED followed the national competitive bidding procedures set forth for the National Open Tendering Method in the GoB’s Public Procurement Rules, 2008 (as updated and issued pursuant to the Bangladesh Public Procurement Act, 2006). The procurement process seems to be transparent.

13

33. The estimated cost of the building (ground floor) and the contract value of the work is Tk 12,406,354.14, which is 0.17% less than the estimated value. Contract agreement was signed on 01 August 2013 and the work will be completed within 24 Aught 2014. Financial progress of the work as of 13 April 2014 was 54.6%.

34. Quality of work: Columns, beams and first floor slab of the building have been completed. 13 meters long and 450 mm diameter 48 piles have been used in foundation. Construction fault in mixing of concrete and formworks were noticed. Materials such as cement, sand, stone chips, brick chips, MS rod were tested and are found acceptable. Test result is shown in Table-2 of Appendix-B.


(c) Functional Building at Bandarban

36. Procurement Process: Tender was invited on 05 May 2013 and published in two daily national news papers (Bangladesh Today on 08 May 2013 and Daik Janat on 21 May 2013) and CPTU website on 16 May 2013 and LGED website on 21 May 2013. Three (3) bids were received on 17 June 2013. All bids were evaluated by the bid evaluation committee. On the recommendation of the bid evaluation committee, the lowest bidder – M/S UT Moung, Bandarban approved by Chief Engineer LGED and concurred by ADB. LGED followed the national competitive bidding procedures set forth for the National Open Tendering Method in the GoB’s Public Procurement Rules, 2008 (as updated and issued pursuant to the Bangladesh Public Procurement Act, 2006). The procurement process seems to be transparent.

37. The estimated cost of the building (ground floor) and the contract value of the work is Tk 14,744,947.00, which is 14.05% above than the estimated value. Contract agreement was signed on 20 August 2013 and the work will be completed within 08 Aught 2014.

38. PD (Rural Road) informed that the foundation design of functional building at Bandarban was prepared by 450mm dia, 16m length cast-in-situ pile on the basis of the subsoil investigation carried by LGED district office, Bandarban. Accordingly bid document was prepared by the in-house individual consultants. During execution of boring for piling works an unsuitable sub soil condition was noticed in compare to the design based sub-soil report. Accordingly boring of pile works was stopped and re-investigation of sub-soil was carried out under the supervision of Central Quality Control Unit of LGED. Revised foundation design has been prepared by the in-house individual consultants. In the revised design, pile’s length and diameter have been increased substantially. As a result, the cost of construction will be increased Tk 4,339,038.00, which is 29.43% over the contract value. GoB’s Public Procurement Rules, 2008 allows contract variation up to 50%. ADB’s concurrence on contract variation is essential. Financial progress of the work as of 16 April 2014 was 42% including the proposed contract variation. Construction of functional building is in progress.

39. Quality of work: Piles works in foundation have been been completed. 16 m long and 450 mm diameter 4 piles, 21 m long and 600 mm diameter 43 piles and 25 m long and 600 mm diameter 2 piles have been used in foundation. Materials such as cement, sand, stone chips, MS rod were tested and are found acceptable. Test result is shown in Table-3 of Appendix-B.


14

2. Community Infrastructure Component

41. SQMC consultants visited four completed and two proposed community infrastructure (CI) subprojects, which are summarized below.

(i) Bodhipur Para Market Shed and Internal Road

42. This subproject consists of 178 sqm of market shed, four toilets, one tube well and 67 m approach road linked to Rangamat-Khagrachari road and is located at Bodhipur Para under Sadar Upazila of Rangamati District. Estimated cost of this subproject is Tk 2,997,689.00 and contract value is Tk 2,989,197.00 which is 0.28% less than the estimated cost. These works have been implemented by Bodhipur Para Development Committee (PDC). Contract agreement was signed on 15 June 2013 and completed on 27 March 2014. LCS group was engaged in roads works, earth cutting, carrying of materials. Equal wages were given to male and female labourers. Bricks were used in road works and construction market shed. DPMO was advised to use coal burnt bricks only. Quality of works seems to be good, except ling road, where brick pavement in HBB laid loosely. DPD (DMPO) was advised to spray sand over HBB brick pavement to fill gaps.

43. Procurement Process: Tender was invited on 16 May 2013 and the notice displayed at local notice board only. Four bids were received on 03 June 2013 and evaluated by a bid evaluation committee4. The PDC followed the national competitive bidding procedures set forth for the National Limited Tendering Method in the GoB’s Public Procurement Rules, 2008 (as updated and issued pursuant to the Bangladesh Public Procurement Act, 2006). Implementing agency has imposed a restriction in the tender notice - “Any bid less than below 5% or more than above 5% of the estimated cost will be treated as informal. A lottery may take place the same lowest rate is quoted by more than one bidder.” This restriction contradicts ADB’s policy stated in the PAM5.

(ii) Poa Para Market Shed

44. This subproject consists of 117 sqm of market shed with RCC roof, four toilets, one tube well and is located adjacent to all-weather road at Poa Para under Kawkhali Upazila of Rangamati District. Estimated cost of this subproject is Tk 2,997,176.00 and contract value is the same as the estimated cost. These works have been implemented by Poa Para PDC.

4 Bid evaluation committee comprises (i) Secretary or any member of PDC (Chairperson),(ii) one member of

PDC (member), (iii) one traditional leader(member), (iv) one female member from beneficiaries (member), (v) Assistant Engineer or Sub-Assistant Engineer (member-secretary). The bid evaluation committee applies for CI component works implemented by PDC at community level.

5 A bid shall not be rejected on the grounds that its bid price is not within a percentage range above or

below the contract estimate. (Ref: PAM’s Attachment: Project Procurement Plan 13, Para 13) and a lottery system shall not be used to determine a successful bidder, including for the purpose of resolving deadlocks (Ref: PAM’s Attachment 11: Project Procurement Plan, Para 13)

15

Contract agreement was signed on 07 June 2013 and completed on 25 September 2013. LCS group was engaged in earth cutting and carrying of materials. Equal wages were given to male and female labourers. Quality of works seems to be good. Market shed area was not cleaned properly after completion of the construction works. DPMO was advised to clean the area.

45. Procurement Process: Tender was invited on 16 May 2013 and the notice displayed at local notice board only. Four bids were received on 06 June 2013 and evaluated by a bid evaluation committee. The PDC followed the national competitive bidding procedures set forth for the National Limited Tendering Method in the GoB’s Public Procurement Rules, 2008 (as updated and issued pursuant to the Bangladesh Public Procurement Act, 2006). Implementing agency has imposed a restriction in the tender notice - “Any bid less than below 5% or more than above 5% of the estimated cost will be treated as informal. A lottery may take place the same lowest rate is quoted by more than one bidder.” This restriction contradicts ADB’s policy stated in the PAM.

(iii) Sapchari Waga Para Market Shed

46. This subproject consists of 117 sqm of market shed with RCC roof, four toilets, one tube well and is located adjacent to all-weather road at Sapchari Waga Para under Kaptai Upazila of Rangamati District. Estimated cost of this subproject is Tk 2,992,240.00 and contract value is the same as the estimated cost. These works have been implemented by Sapchari Waga Para PDC. Contract agreement was signed on 07 June 2013 and completed on 17 January 2014. LCS group was engaged in earth cutting and carrying of materials. Equal wages were given to male and female labourers. Quality of works seems to be good.

16

47. Procurement Process: Tender was invited on 16 May 2013 and the notice displayed at local notice board only. Four bids were received on 06 June 2013 and evaluated by a bid evaluation committee. The PDC followed the national competitive bidding procedures set forth for the National Limited Tendering Method in the GoB’s Public Procurement Rules, 2008 (as updated and issued pursuant to the Bangladesh Public Procurement Act, 2006). Implementing agency has imposed a restriction in the tender notice - “Any bid less than below 5% or more than above 5% of the estimated cost will be treated as informal. A lottery may take place the same lowest rate is quoted by more than one bidder.” This restriction contradicts ADB’s policy stated in the PAM.

(iv) Sonai Seprue Para

48. Sonai Seprue Para subproject is located in Rowangchori Upazial of Bandarban District. This subproject consists of In consultation with the community, DPMO proposed village access road 2.54 km of HBB brick pavement, 210m road side drains, 14 pipe culverts, 23m steps and drum sheet palisading works and its estimated cost is Tk 8,938190.00. The proposed village access road will be connected with the main road of Bagmara bazaar to Antapara road which was developed by ADB financed CHRTDP-I and CHTRDP.

49. The SQMC consultant participated consultation meeting with the PIC consultants head by Team Leader, NGO and DPD (DPMO) of Bandarban. It was a demonstration to NGO representatives to show them how to conduct a consultation meeting with the community. Gender Specialist (PIC) conducted the consultation meetings with the community. The community people informed that it is very difficult for the villagers to bring commodities to the market/sell centre which is about 3.5Km long away from the village. They have been facing trouble due to lack of road communication facilities in receiving medical treatment, sending their children to educational institutions and other business purposes. The villagers also have been suffering from acute crises of drinking. People of the community demanded to implement the subproject immediately.

(v) Khebuk Para

50. Khebuk Para subproject is located in the Sadar Upazila of Bandarban District. Marma, Tanchangya and Chakma indigenous communities are living in the area. The SQMC consultant participated consultation meeting with the PIC consultants head by Team Leader, NGO and DPD (DPMO) of Bandarban. It was also a demonstration to NGO representatives to show them how to conduct a consultation meeting with the community. Gender Specialist (PIC) conducted the consultation meetings with the community. The community people informed that they don’t have safe water for drinking. The main source of drinking water in the village is dug wells. There is acute shortage of water in the dry season and dug wells get

17

polluted with dirty water in rainy season. There is 35 acres of plain cultivable land in the village and 16 households are dependent on share cropping cultivation on that area of land.

51. With an estimated cost of Tk 831356.00, DPD (DPMO), Bandarban has proposed for the installation of 38mm dia 3 deep tube wells for drinking water supply and domestic use and 2 power tillers for agricultural cultivation. This proposed subproject needs in-depth study to support the community.

III. Training and Workshop

52. PMO of CHTRDP-II organizing an Orientation Workshop on Environment and Social safeguards on 26 April 2014, training on Land Acquisition & Resettlement Plan Implementation on 27 April 2014, and workshop on Land Acquisition & Resettlement Plan Implementation on 28 April 2014 at Rangamati. Team Leader (PIC), Gender Specialist (PIC), Social Safeguard Specialist (PIC) and two consultants of SQMC were facilitations of the workshop and the training course. The modules of the training and workshops (power point presentation) were developed in consultation Ms Satoko Tanaka, Senior Transport Specialist, BRM, ADB. Dayal Kumar Chakma (Consultant/Project Coordinator/) Ms Manju Rani Debi (Consultant /Finance & Administration Officer), Deputy Team Leader (PIC), Training Specialist (PIC) provided supports for arranging these training and workshops under the guidance of the Project Director (PMO).

53. Workshop on Environmental and Social Safeguards: Forty four (44) participants, who were 8 participants from DPMO, 32 participants from LGED, 4 participants from PIC & SDS consultants and 8 participants from NGO were attended in the Environmental & Social

18

Safeguards Orientation workshop held on 26 April 2014. List of participants is shown in Appendix-C. The workshop mainly focused on ADB’s Safeguard Policy Statement which includes policy objectives, scopes and triggers, eligibility for ADB financing, ADB & borrowers roles and responsibilities, policy principles and safeguards requirements, safeguard disclosure system, template of IEE and EIA, eennvviirroonnmmeennttaall mmaannaaggeemmeenntt ppllaann,, mmoonniittoorriinngg ppaarraammeetteerrss,, iimmppaacctt aannaallyyssiiss,, ssttaakkeehhoollddeerr ccoonnssuullttaattiioonn,, iinnffoorrmmaattiioonn ddiisscclloossuurree,, ggrriieevvaannccee rreeaaddddrreessss mmeecchhaanniissmmss,, LLAARRPP pprreeppaarraattiioonn aanndd iimmpplleemmeennttaattiioonn,, aanndd ccoommmmuunniittyy iinnffrraassttrruuccttuurree aanndd ggeennddeerr iissssuueess..

54. Training on Land Acquisition and Resettlement Implementation: TTwweennttyy ssiixx ((2266)) participants, from which 6 participants from IP representatives, 3 participants from DPMO, 3 participants from LGED, 4 participants from PIC & SDS consultants, and 10 senior and field level officials from RNGO were attended in the training course on Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan LARP) Implementation held on 27 April 2014. List of participants is shown in Appendix-D. The training mainly focused on conducting surveys and preparation of resettlement plans and LARP implementation procedure including Grievance Redress Mechanism.

55. Workshop on Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan Implementation: TThhiirrttyy ((3300)) participants, of which 6 participants from Deputy Commissioner’s Offices (Rangamati, Bandarban and Khagrachari), 8 participants from IP representatives, 3 participants from DPMO, 1 participant from PIC, and 12 participants from RNGO were attended in the workshop on Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan Implementation held on 28 April 2014. List of participants is shown in Appendix-E. The workshop mainly focused on conducting surveys and preparation of resettlement plans and LARP implementation procedure including Grievance Redress Mechanism.

IV. COORDINATION AND LIAISON

1. UNDP- CHTDF

56. A Coordination meeting between PIC (CHTRDP-II) and UNDP (CHTDF) meeting was held on April 10 2014 at UNDP Rangamati office to discuss about sharing of program/

19

components with each other to avoid overlapping of the social development programs. The SQMC consultants were attended the meeting and participated in discussion. It was discussed in the meeting that UNDP supported CHT-Development Facility (CHTDF) programme and CHTRDP-II cannot be overlapped in same community. CHTDF has organized over the years some 3,457 Para Development Committees (PDCs) in 20 Upazila’s in the 3 Hill Districts, to undertake community development initiatives, such as small-scale area-based income generating initiatives, rural infrastructure and socio-economic improvements.

57. A major topic that was discussed was the Harmonization of Laws and Acts in the CHT. UNDP and ADB have been successful in lobbying for harmonization of Laws and Acts at national level, particularly concerning land issues. The Meeting proposed the following actions to improve coordination and collaboration between the two programs/projects at the implementation level.

Actions Required Person(s) Responsible Deadline

1. Develop a functional coordination system between UNDP-CHTDF and CHTRDP-II: Each Program / Project will discuss internally and develop a proposal for Functional Coordination System

For UNDP-CHTDF: Mr. Biblab Chakma; For PIC / CHTRDP-II: Mr. Bert van Ommen

End of April 2014

2. Establish two Working Groups to identify, exchange and coordinate specific field activities in (i) Institutional Development and Capacity Building (IDCB), and (ii) Community (Infrastructure) Development (CID), including micro agribusiness development;

UNDP-CHTDF: for IDCB: Mr. Shwe Aung Prue; For CID: Mr. Biblab Chakma; PIC / CHTRDP-II: For IDCB: Mr. Wenue Prue Marma; For CID: Ms. Sinora Chakma

10 May 2014

3. Develop TORs for these two Working Groups;

By the working groups after first meetings

4. Share a copy of the Roadmap for “Amendments to The Chittagong Hill Tracts Land Dispute Resolution Commission Act 2001”

Mr. Md Nurul Islam, SQMC a.s.a.p.

5. Review and explore where the CHTRDP-II can support the CHTDF’s CDPs. It is suggested CHTRDP-II to review plans and consider joining progress review meetings with institutions

Mr. Shwe Aung Prue, CHTDF, and Mr. Wenue Prue Marma, PIC, to work out this draft Work Plan

30 April 2014

2. Chittagong Hill Tracts Development Board (CHTDB)

58. CHTDB is an autonomous agency and implements different civil works including improvement of road, construction of bridges and culverts, community development and upland agriculture to mainly resettle shifting cultivators. The annual development budget of CHTDB is about $5.2 million covering both block grant and project-based allocations.

59. During field visit, the SQMC consultant has noticed that CHTDB and CHTRDP-II implement or propose to implement road works. To avoid overlapping, the SQMC consultant met Vice Chairman of CHTDB and discussed how to avoid overlapping development works with other agencies. After discussion, it is revealed that LGED, Hill District Councils and CHTDB implement improvement and maintenance of road works, construction of bridges

20

and culverts. To avoid overlapping with these agencies, a coordination committee needs to be formed headed by Chairman/Vice-Chairman of CHTDB as convenor. Other members of the committee may be LGED Executive Engineers, CHTDB Executive Engineers, HDC Executive Engineers, Deputy Project Directors (DPMO) of the three hill districts. Senior Planning Officer of CHTDB may be included as member-secretary of the committee. The committee will meet twice a year and discuss their programme to avoid overlapping. This issue was discussed with the Secretary, MoCHTA to form a coordination committee at the CHTDB level.

V. SAFEGUARD AND QUALITY MONITORING CELL (SQMC)

60. Both consultants of the SQMC have commenced their services on 18 March 2013. Inputs of Environmental Engineer 62 working days (WD) and Social Safeguards Specialist 30 WD were utilized from the commencement of the services. A total of 92 WD against the contracted 816 WD6 were utilized. The utilisation of services against the planned time schedule is given below. Considering consultation with Project Director (PMO), Project Director (Rural Roads), Team Leader and Deputy Team Leader of Project Implementing Consultant (PIC), SQMC consultants will resume their services from December 2014 to March 2015. The Social Safeguards Specialist will be at site in December 2014 if the resettlement plan implementation is started by this time. The Environmental Engineer will be resuming his services on 08 February 2015.

6 To keep total contact amount within the DPP budget provision, total inputs of 132 WD (6 MM) were reduced

from the original inputs of 440 WD (20 MM) for each consultant.

21

VI. KEY OBSERVATIONS

61. PMO has been established with all of the required staff. The Deputy Project Directors along with support staff are on board in three hill districts. But deployment of the Non-governmental Organizations for Micro Agro-business Development (MAD) and Community Infrastructure (CI) component are not yet completed. Only Resettlement NGO (RNGO) for implementation of the Resettlement Plans has been deployed. A Resettlement Specialist has been deployed by the PIC. One Training Specialist has also been recruited by the PIC; both of them are working now in the project.

62. LGED is implementing the rural roads component of CHTRDP-II with LGED staff working at district and upazilas within the project area including 27 incremental project staff. During discussion with LGED officials it was learnt that LGED recruited/deployed 19 project staff out of required 27 and reaming 8 project staff (2 Assistant Engineer and 6 Sub-Assistant Engineers) yet to be recruited/deployed. During discussion with Chief Engineer, he assured that these positions will be filled up before the starting the implementation of project works (Rural Road Component) at the field.

63. Progress of the project implementation is slow due to a slow start up and delays due to late deployment of PIC, social mobilization NGOs, and resettlement NGO. Commencement of civil works for the community infrastructure component is progressing; but civil works of rural road component except functional building could not be started due to delays of the preparation and implementation of LARP. Acceleration is necessary for both preparation and implementation with the efforts of PMO, DPMO, PIC, and NGOs.

64. During field visit, it was observed that some persons/families will be affected by the acquisition of lands to widen road crest for the upgradation of upazial and union roads. As the population density and the volume of traffic plying on the upazila and union roads of the CHT area are significantly smaller than that similar category of roads in the plain areas of Bangladesh and to reduce affected persons/families, the crest with of upazila and union road may be reduced as a special case for the CHT area. This issue was discussed with the Chief Engineer of LGED and he agreed to reduce road crest.

65. Raikhali GC Ferry Ghat-Rajastholi HQ via Mitingachari Upazila Road located in Kaptai Upazial under Rangamati District needs protection of 275 m river bank, which was eroded by the Karnaphuli River. Public and private utilities need to be relocated for the bank protection. The relocation of utilities and bank protection works are highly costly. Bangladesh Water Development Board (BWDB) has implemented some portion of bank protection works near the same location. MoCHTA may request BWDB to undertake the protection of 275 m river bank.

66. About 50% bridge (over Sangu River on Raicha-Goaliakhola) and its one approach road are outside of the jurisdiction of CHT Region. LGED’s Chief Engineer has agreed to allocate money from GoB fund for land acquisition and construction of approach road, which is within the jurisdiction of Chittagong District.

67. DPMOs have completed some works of CI component. It was observed that restrictions in the tender notice were imposed - “Any bid less than below 5% or more than above 5% of the estimated cost will be treated as informal. A lottery may take place the same lowest rate is quoted by more than one bidder.” These restrictions contradict ADB’s policy stated in the PAM.

68. The crest width of upazila road may be reduced from 7.3m (24ft) to 5.5m (18ft) by reducing the earthen shoulder from 3.7m (12ft=2x6ft) to 1.8m (6ft=2x3ft) keeping pavement width 3.7m (12ft). Similarly, the crest width of union road may be reduced from 5.5m (18ft) to 4.6m (15ft) by reducing the earthen shoulder from 2.5m (8ft=2x4ft) to 1.6m (5ft=2x2.5ft) keeping pavement width 3.0m (10ft). Extra crest width needs be added for the provision of drain, parapet and top of retaining wall where requires.

22

69. Upgradation of upazila roads, union roads, village access roads, construction of market shed and other civil works will consume huge numbers of bricks. To encourage brick manufacturers burning bricks with coal, only coal burnt bricks should be used in ADB financed civil works.

70. LGED obtained environmental clearance for Rural Roads Components of CHTRDP-II from the Department of Environment, Bangladesh. Environmental site clearance certificate is given in Appendix-F.

71. It was observed that lack of cooperation and coordination exists between Project Director (PMO) including PIC with Project Director (Rural Roads). Honourable Chairman (CHTRC) has expressed his dissatisfaction on LGED’s cooperation with CHTRC and PD (PMO). He emphasized on more cooperation and coordination among the executing agencies. This situation should be improved for sake of smooth implementation of the project. Project Director and Deputy Project Director (Rural Roads) alternately should spend 10 to 15 days per month in the project area to accelerate project implementation.

VII. CONCLUSION

72. The SQMC consultants are thankful to Project Director (PMO), Project Director (Rural Roads), Deputy Project Directors (DPMOs), PIC, Project Coordinator, in house consultants and LGED Executive Engineers of Rangamati, Khagrachari and Banderban districts for their cooperation and supports. Project implementation will be progressing in a full swing after monsoon and after getting the NGOs for MAD and CI component on board. Good coordination between PMO and LGED especially two Project Directors will help smooth implementation of the project.

_______

23

Summary of Building Materials Test Results

Table 1: Extension of Functional Building, Executive Engineer’s Office, LGED, Rangamati

Sl # Name of Lab Test Result

Remarks Specified Obtained

1 FM of Local Sand 1.2 1.31 2 FM of Course Sand 2.5 2.72 3 LAA value of stone chips 30% 30% 4 Gradation of stone chips well graded well graded 5 Water absorption of stone chips 2% 1.7% 6 LAA value of brick chips 40% 40% 7 Gradation of brick chips well graded well graded 8 Water absorption of brick chips 16% 15% 9 Compressive strength of brick 2,500 psi 2,740 psi 10 Water absorption of brick 16% 15.73% 11 Setting time of cement

(a) Initial setting time 45 min (min) 115 min (b) Final setting time 375 min (max) 270 min

12 Compressive strength of cement (a) For 3 days 1,800 psi 1,890 psi (b) For 7 days 2,800 psi 3,070 psi

13 Setting time of cement (a) Initial setting time 45 min (min) 115 min (b) Final setting time 375 min (max) 265 min


15 Concrete strength (28 days) (a) Piles 3,600 psi 3,630 psi (b) Pile caps 2,850 psi 2,860 psi

16 MS Rod Ultimate Stress Specified Obtained

(a) 10 mm dia 60,000 psi 84,760 psi (b) 12 mm dia 60,000 psi 80,760 psi (c) 16 mm dia 60,000 psi 80,760 psi (d) 20 mm dia 60,000 psi 93,390 psi

Appendix-A Page 1 of 3

24

Table 2: Extension of Functional Building, Executive Engineer’s Office, LGED, Khagrachari



1 FM of Local Sand 1.2 1.22 2 FM of Course Sand 2.5 2.70 3 LAA value of stone chips 30% 30% 4 Gradation of stone chips well graded well graded 5 Water absorption of stone chips 2% 2% 6 LAA value of brick chips 40% 40% 7 Gradation of brick chips well graded well graded 8 Water absorption of brick chips 16% 14% 9 Compressive strength of brick 2,500 psi 2,522 psi 10 Water absorption of brick 16% 15% 11 Setting time of cement



13 Setting time of cement (a) Initial setting time 45 min (min) 142 min (b) Final setting time 375 min (max) 255 min

14

Concrete strength (28 days) (a) Piles 3,600 psi 3,713 psi (b) Pile caps 2,850 psi 2,937 psi (c) Grade Beams 2,850 psi 2,876 psi (d) Columns (Ground Floor) 2,850 psi 2,937 psi (e) Beam & Slab (First Floor) 2,850 psi 2,906 psi




25

Table 3: Extension of Functional Building, Executive Engineer’s Office, LGED, Bandarban



1 FM of Local Sand 1.2 1.63 2 FM of Course Sand 2.5 2.68 3 LAA value of stone chips 30% 26% 4 Gradation of stone chips well graded well graded 5 Water absorption of stone chips 2% 1.12% 6 LAA value of brick chips 40% 40% 7 Gradation of brick chips well graded well graded 8 Water absorption of brick chips 16% 15.39% 9 Setting time of cement






26

LIST OF PERSONS MET

Ministry of Chittagong Hill Tracts Affairs Mr. Naba BIKRAM Kishore Tripura ndc, Secretary Mr. Basudeb Acharjee, Joint Secretary Ms. Tania Khan, Senior Assistant Chief Chittagong Hill Tracts Regional Council, Rangamati

Mr. Jyotirindriyo Bodhipriyo Larma, Honorable Chairman

Local Government Engineering Department, LGED HQ, Dhaka

Mr. Md. Wahidur Rahman, Chief Engineer Mr. Mir Elias Morshed, Superintending Engineer (Admin) Chittagong Hill Tracts Development Board, Rangamati Mr. Tarun Kanti Ghosh, Vice Chairman Mr. Priti Kanti Tripura, Senior Planning Officer UNDP

Mr. Robert Stoelman, Chief Implementation, UNDP-CHTDF Mr. Biplab Chakma, Chief, Community Empowerment, CHTDF Mr. Md Habibur Rahman, Cluster Leader, Community Empowerment, CHTDF Mr. Shwe Aung Prue, Cluster Leader Capacity Development & Service Delivery, CHTDF Second Chittagong Hill Tracts Rural Development Project

Mr. Sukrity Ranjann Chakma (ndc), Project Director (PMO), Rangamati Mr. Swapon Kumar Das, Project Director (PIO), LGED HQ, Dhaka Mr. Shah Nurul Quadir, Deputy Project Director (PIO), LGED HQ, Dhaka Mr. Abirata Chakma, Deputy Project Director (DPMO), Rangamati Mr. Asha Pradip Chakma, Deputy Project Director (DPMO), Khagrachari Mr. Jugesh Chandra Tanchangya, Deputy Project Director (DPMO), Bandarban Consultants, Second Chittagong Hill Tract Rural Development Project Mr. J.A.M. Bert Van Ommen, Team Leader, PIC Mr. Ahmed Newaz, Deputy Team Leader, PIC Mr. Dayal Kumar Chakma, National Consultant/Project Coordinator Ms.Manju Rani Debi, National Consultant/Finance & Administration Officer Ms. Sinora Chakma, Gender Specialist, PIC Mr. Mrinal Kanti Chakma, Social Safeguard & Resettlement Specialist, PIC Mr. Golam Mostafa, Structural Engineer, SDS Consultant Mr. Md. Delwar Hossain, Senior Engineer, SDS Consultant Mr. Md. Abdul Qayyum Khan, Road Engineer, SDS Consultant Mr. Jayer Khisa, Junior Engineer, PIC Mr. Rupan Kumar Chakma, Junior Engineer, PIC

LGED, Rangamati

Mr. Malay Kumar Chakraborty, Executive Engineer Mr. Tripti Shnkar Chakma, Senior Assistant Engineer

Mr. Md. Akbor Hossain, Upazila Engineer, Lanadu Upazil

Appendix-B Page 1of 5

27

Mr. Md. Nazrul Islam, Upazila Engineer, Kawkhali Upazila Mr. Md. Abdul Quader, Sub-Assistant Engineer, Lanadu Upazil Mr. Md. Shah Alam, Sub-Assistant Engineer, Kaptai Upazila

LGED, Bandarban

Mr. Kya Hla Khoin, Executive Engineer Mr. Md. Babul Akhter, Senior Assistant Engineer Mr. Dibakar Roy, Assistant Engineer Mr. Md. Nazrul Islam, Sub-Assistant Engineer

LGED, Khagrachari

Mr. Md. Sohrab Ali, Executive Engineer Mr. Abdus Sattar, Senior Assistant Engineer Mr. Md. Farid Miah, Upazila Engineer, Sadar Upazila Mr. Md. Anowar Hossain, Upazila Engineer, Panchari Upazila Mr. Md. Asaduzzaman, Upazila Engineer, Mahalchari Upazila Mr. Md. Shahad Hossain, Upazila Engineer, Manikchari CHT Community, Rangamati

1. Poa Para Market Shed, Kawkhali Upazila

Mr. Ranjid Chakma, Poa Para, Kawkhali Mr. Prodip Talukder Chakma, Poa Para, Kawkhali 2. Bodhipur Para Market Shed, Rangamati Sadar Upazila

Mr. Bijoy Kumar Karbari, Chaiman, PDC Mr. Rupantar Chakma, Secretary, PDC Mr. Sanjib Chakma ,UP member Mr. Baloram Chakma, Bodhipur, Mr. Nil Chandra Chakma, Bodhipur Mr. Inda Muzib Chakma, Bodhipur Ms Maya Debi Chakma, Bodhipur Ms Sumuki Mala Chakma, Bodhipur Ms Pradimala Chakma, Bodhipur Mr. Moni Bhadra Chakma, Bodhipur Mr. Surjamohan Chakma, Bodhipur Mr. Mongal Moni Chakma, Bodhipur Mr. Chanra Lal Chakma, Bodhipur CHT Community, Bandarban 1. Sonai Seprue Para, Rowangchori Upazila

Mr. Uchanu Marma, Karbari, Sonai Seprue Para, Mr. Mong me u marma, PDC Chairman Mr. U ba prue, Sonai Seprue Para, Rowangchori Mr. Chingsamong, Sonai Seprue Para, Rowangchori Mr. Mong Basing, PDC Secretary, Sonai Seprue Para Mr. Ukeothowai, Sonai Seprue Para, Rowangchori Mr. Mong Nu prue, Sonai Seprue Para, Rowangchori Mr. Chani Mong, Sonai Seprue Para, Rowangchori Mr. Goiramong, Sonai Seprue Para, Rowangchori

Appendix-B Page 2 of 5

28

Mr. Mong Thwain, Sonai Seprue Para, Rowangchori Mr. Hlaching Mong, Sonai Seprue Para, Rowangchori Mr. Aung Keoching, Sonai Seprue Para, Rowangchori Mr. U keo hla, Sonai Seprue Para, Rowangchori Mr. Mong chinu, Sonai Seprue Para, Rowangchori Mr. Sumong prue, Sonai Seprue Para, Rowangchori Mr. GSadu aung, Sonai Seprue Para, Rowangchori Mr. Memong prue, Sonai Seprue Para, Rowangchori Mr. Aung keo nu, Sonai Seprue Para, Rowangchori Mr. Su Aung, Sonai Seprue Para, Rowangchori Ms. Rule Prue, Sonai Seprue Para, Rowangchori Ms. Umeching, Sonai Seprue Para, Rowangchori Ms. Mekhoy ching, Sonai Seprue Para, Rowangchori Ms. Ninu ching, Sonai Seprue Para, Rowangchori Ms. Minu ching, Sonai Seprue Para, Rowangchori Ms. Naima U, Sonai Seprue Para, Rowangchori Ms. Umaching, Sonai Seprue Para, Rowangchori Ms. Ma cho, Sonai Seprue Para, Rowangchori Ms. Su Nue ching, Sonai Seprue Para, Rowangchori Ms. Ching hla u, Sonai Seprue Para, Rowangchori Ms. Hla hi nue, Sonai Seprue Para, Rowangchori Ms. Me prue sa, Sonai Seprue Para, Rowangchori Ms. Kela, (Sonai Seprue Para, Rowangchori Ms. Uchanu, Sonai Seprue Para, Rowangchori Ms. Menuching, Sonai Seprue Para, Rowangchori Ms. Kownuching, Sonai Seprue Para, Rowangchori Ms. Prue U chan, Sonai Seprue Para, Rowangchori Ms. Pruehlacing, Sonai Seprue Para, Rowangchori

2. Khebuk Para, Bandarban Sadar Upazila

Mr. Arimong Marma, PDC Chairman, Khebuk Para, Mr. Shaigya Marma Marma, Khebuk Para Mr. Paisa Marma Marma, Khebuk Para Ms. Manu Marma, Khebuk Para Mr. Pothoiwain Marma, Khebuk Para Mr. Paiprueaung Marma, Khebuk Para Mr. Medhumong Marma, Khebuk Para Mr. Umechandra Chakma, Khebuk Para Mr. Upaching Marma, Khebuk Para Mr. Profulol Chakma, Khebuk Para Ms. Paishida Marma, Khebuk Para Ms. Sweemaching Marma, Khebuk Para Ms. Akray Marma, Khebuk Para Mr. Aunjon Chakma, Khebuk Para Ms. Paiwa Marma, Khebuk Para Ms. Mashe-u Marma, Khebuk Para Mr. Mongching Marma, Khebuk Para Mr. Paipruehla Marma, Khebuk Para Ms. Painima Marma, Khebuk Para Ms. Sanondebi Chakma, Khebuk Para Ms. Paicranu Marma, Khebuk Para 3. Naikonchari Upazila

Mr. Ufocha Marma, Ex-Member, Bandarban District Council, Naikonchari Mr. Aung Thun Ching Chak, Karbari, Chak Headman Para, Naikonchari Mr. Ba Cha Ching Chak, Headman, Naikonchari


29

4. Naikhangchori - Tumbru Road, Naikonchari Upazila

Mr. Deepok Borua, Chairman, Gundum Union Mr. Md. Fazlul Karim, Member, Gundum Union Mr. Abdul Zabbar, Village Police, Tumbru Mr. Kewla Singh, Tumbru Mr. Ong Chu, Tumbru Mr. Syed Alam, Tumbru Mr. Kala Prue, Tumbru Mr. Abdul Zabbar, Tumbru Ms. Oua Puri, Tumbru Ms. Umma Singh, Tumbru Ms. Tuna Singh, Tumbru Ms. Jata Bala, Tumbru Ms. Ungrul, Tumbru Ms. Raima Singh, Tumbru Ms. Mokkang, Tumbru Mr. Kew Sa Singh, Tumbru Mr. Lalu Singh, Tumbru Mr. Kera Teng Singh, Tumbru Mr. Mong Sui Singh, Tumbru Mr. Abdus Sattar, Tumbru Mr. Sui Tej Mong, Tumbru Mr. Ong Pusha, Tumbru Mr. Soi Tai Singh, Tumbru Mr. Zalal Ahmed, Tumbru Mr. Rangaia, Tumbru Mr. Sui Tai Mong, Tumbru Ms. Mala Wo, Tumbru Mr. Mong Pulang, Tumbru Mr. La Su Mong, Tumbru Ms. Dhalu, Tumbru Mr. Zha King, Tumbru Mr. Kema Ching, Tumbru 5. Raicha-Goaliakola (Bridge over Shangu River)

Mr. Md. Nurul Islam Mr. Md. Yusuf Ali , Mr. Md. Syed Nur Ms. Zannatara Begum Ms. Runa Akter Ms. Baby Akter Ms. Asya Khatun Ms. Usnan Akter Ms. Roksana Akter Mr. Mong Sa Prue Mr. Aong Sa Prue Mr. Nu Mong Marma Mr. Mong Nu Marma Mr. Thui Se Mong Mr. Neo Ching Mong Ms. Mala Prue Mr. Ching Si Mong


30

Mr. Mong Si Marma Mr. Ching Sui Nue Mr. Sa Cho Prue Mr. Seue Gae Mr. Sai Gou CHT Community, Khagrachari 1. Panchari – Bhaibonchara Road, Panchari Upazila

Mr. Khokau Bikash Chakma, Panchari Mr. Pariwal Chakma, Panchari Mr. Utpal Chakma, Panchari Ms. Padwa Rani Chakma, Panchari Ms. Jibon Jyoti Chakma, Panchari Mr. Bijoy Bikash Chakma, Panchari Ms. Amar Jyoti Chakma, Panchari Mr. Tanak Chakma, Panchari Mr. Juaus Prabiet Talukder, Panchari Mr. Gonodhar Chakma, Panchari Ms. Chandraban Chakma, Panchari Mr. Kulota Moni, Karbari, Panchari


31

Workshop on Environmental and Social Safeguards

Venue: ASHIKA Auditorium, Rangamati Date: 26 April 2014

List of Participants

1. Mr. Jugesh Chandra Tangchangya, Deputy Project Director, CHTRDP-II, DPMO,

Bandarban

2. Mr. Abirata Chakma, Deputy Project Director, CHTRDP-II, DPMO, Rangamati

3. Mr. Asha Pradip Chakma, Deputy Project Director, CHTRDP-II, DPMO, Khagrachari

4. Mr. Udayan Chakma, Assistant Engineer, CHTRDP-II, DPMO, Bandarban

5. Mr. Jashoda Binoy Chakma, Assistant Engineer, CHTRDP-II, DPMO, Khagrachari

6. Mr. Rupam Chakma, Sub-Assistant Engineer, CHTRDP-II, DPMO, Khagrachari

7. Mr. Cheusang Thangming, Sub-Assistant Engineer, CHTRDP-II, DPMO, Rangamati

8. Mr. Mongmui Aong Marma, Sub-Assistant Engineer, CHTRDP-II, DPMO, Bandarban

9. Mr. Tripti Shankar Chakma, Sr. Assistant Engineer, XEN Office, LGED, Rangamati

10. Mr. Md. Abdus Sattar Howladar, Sr. Assistant Engineer, XEN Office, LGED, Khagrachari

11. Mr. Dibakar Roy, Assistant Engineer, XEN Office, LGED, Bandarban

12. Mr. Md. Anwarul Hoque, Upazila Engineer, LGED, Matiranga, Khagrachari

13. Mr. Md. Asaduzzaman, Upazila Engineer, Mahalchari, Khagrachari

14. Mr. Md. Shahadat Hossain, Upazila Engineer, Manikchari, Khagrachari

15. Mr. Md. Burhan Uddin, Upazila Engineer, LGED, Kaptai, Rangamati

16. Mr. Md. Shah Alam, Upazila Engineer, LGED, Lazmichari, Khagrachari

17. Mr. Md. Main Uddin, Upazila Engineer, LGED, Jurachari, Rangamati.

18. Mr. Md. Nazrul Islam, Upazila Engineer, LGED, Kawkhali, Rangamati

19. Mr. Salman Rahman Rasel, Upazila Engineer, LGED, Longadu, Rangamati

20. Mr. Md. Ziaul Haque Dulal, Upazila Engineer, LGED, Baghaichari, Rangamati

21. Mr. Khondaker, Mahmudul Ashraf, Upazila Engineer, LGED, Barkal, Rangamati

22. Mr. Bodor Uddin Ahmed, Upazila Engineer, Belaichari, Rangamati

23. Mr. Md. Zamir Hussain, Upazila Engineer, LGED, Nailhongchari, Bandarban.

24. Mr. Md. Mobarak Hossain, Upazila Engineer, LGED, Lama, Bandarban

25. Mr. Robiul Hossain, Upazila Asstt. Engineer, LGED, Ruma, Bandarban

26. Mr. Md. Shah Alam, Sub-Assistant Engineer, LGED, Kaptai, Rangamati

27. Mr. Md. Alam, Sub-Assistant Engineer, LGED, Panchari, Khagrachari

28. Mr. Sipon Kumar Das, Sub-Assistant Engineer, LGED, Sadar, Khagrachari

29. Mr. Dharma Mohan Chakma, Sub-Assistant Engineer, LGED, Rajasthali, Rangamati

30. Mr. Shahed Hossain, Sub-Assistant Engineer, LGED, Sadar, Rangamati

31. Mr. Md. Saydur Rahman, Sub-Assistant Engineer, CHTRDP-II, Dhaka.

Appendix-C Page 1 of 2

32

32. Mr. Md. Kabir Hossain, Sub-Assistant Engineer, LGED, Rowangchari, Bandarban

33. Mr. Abdul Qayyum Khan, Road Engineer, CHTRDP-II, LGED, Rangamati.

34. Mr. Jayes Khisa, Junior Engineer, CHTRDP-II, PIC, Khagrachari

35. Mr. Rupan Kumar Chakma, Junior Engineer, CHTRDP-II, PIC, Rangamati

36. Mr. Raphael Tripura, Junior Engineer, CHTRDP-II, PIC, Bandarban

37. Mr. Bimalendu Chakma, Project Manager,TAUNGYA, Rangamati

38. Mr. Ashok Kumar Chakma, Resettlement Specialist, TAUNGYA, Rangamati

39. Ms. Prity Chakma, Supervisor, TRINAMUL, Khagrachari

40. Mr. Shaymol Bikash Chakma, Lead Supervisor, TRINAMUL, Khagrachari

41. Mr. Manas Mukul Chakma, Supervisor, Green Hill, Rangamati

42. Mr. Dipak Chakma, Lead Supervisor, Green Hill, Rangamati

43. Adv. Chanchu Chakma, Income Restoration Specialist, TOYMU, Rangamati

44. Mr. Apul Tripura, Lead Supervisor, TOYMU, Bandarban

___________

Appendix-C Page 2 of 2

33

Training Course on Land Acquisition and Resettlement Implementation Venue: Conference Room, RDSA, Rangamati

Date: 27 April 2014


1. Mr. Bishwa Kalyan Chakma, President, Bangladesh UP Forum, Khagrachari

2. Mr. Ching Kew Roaza, President, Headman Association, Rangamati

3. Mr. Shadesh Prite Chakma, Secretary, District Headman Association, Khagrachari

4. Mr. Jagadish Roaza, Headman Representative, Choto Panchari Mouza, Khagrachari

5. Mr. S.M Chowdhury, Headman, Dabua Mouza, Betbunia, Rangamati

6. Mr. Aong Kyaja Chowdhury, Headman, Betbunia, Kawkhali, Rangamati

7. Mr. Abdul Qayyum Khan, Road Engineer, CHTRDP-II, LGED, Rangamati


9. Mr. Udayan Chakma,Assistant Engineer, CHTRDP-II, DPMO, Bandarban

10. Mr. Rupan Kumar Chakma, Junior Engineer, CHTRDP-II, PIC, Rangamati

11. Mr. Raphael Tripura, Junior Engineer, CHTRDP-II, PIC, Bandarban


13. Mr. Cheusang Thangming, Sub-Assistant Engineer, CHTRDP-II, DPMO, Rangamati

14. Mr. Ranen Chakma, Surveyor, CHTRDP-II, LGED, Rangamati

15. Mr. Trinayn Chakma, Surveyor, CHTRDP-II, LGED, Rangamati

16. Mr. Kamal Kiran Chakma, Surveyor, CHTRDP-II, LGED, Rangamati

17. Mr. Bimalendu Chakma, Project Manager, TAUNGYA, Rangamati

18. Mr. Atanu Dewan, District Field Facilitator, TAUNGYA, Rangamati

19. Mr. Khanos Chakma, District Field Facilitator, TAUNGYA, Rangamati

20. Mr. Rupayan Chakma, District Project Officer, TAUNGYA, Rangamati

21. Ms. Minu Chakma, District Field Facilitator, TAUNGYA, Rangamati

22. Ms. Papiya Chakma, District Filed Facilitator, TAUNGYA, Rangamati

23. Mr. Tanak Chakma, District Field Facilitator, TAUNGYA, Rangamati

24. Mr. Reetesh Roy, District Field Facilitator, TAUNGYA, Rangamati

25. Adv. Chanchu Chakma, Income Restoration Specialist, TOYMU, Rangamati

26. Ms. Jinu Chakma, Monitoring and Documentation Officer, TAUNGYA, Rangamati

____________

Appendix-D

34

Workshop on Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan Implementation Venue: Conference Room, Hill District Council, Rangamati

Date: 28 April 2014


1. Mr. Md. Habibullah Baher, Additional Land Acquisition Officer, DC Office, Khagrachari

2. Mr. Mohhamad Nurul Absar, Land Officer, Bandarban Hill District Council, Bandarban

3. Mr. Nitish Chakma, Kanungo, DC Office, Rangamati

4. Mr. Md. Ali Afroz, Land Acquisition Officer, DC Office, Khagrachari

5. Mr. Jaladeshwar Chakma, Additional Land Acquisition Officer, DC Office, Rangamati

6. Mr. Chandar Lal Chakma, Kanungo, DC Office, Khagrachari

7. Mr. Bishwa Kalyan Chakma, President, Bangladesh UP Forum, Khagrachari

8. Mr. Shadesh Prite Chakma, Secretary, District Headman Association, Khagrachari

9. Mr. Sui Nu Prue Chowdhury, Chairman, Sindukchari UP, Mahalchari, Khagrachari

10. Mr. Aong La Ching Marma, Chairman, Wagga UP, Kaptai, Rangamati

11. Mr. Shanti Bijoy Chakma, Headman, Naraichari Mouza, Belaichari, Rangamati

12. Mr. Thui Aong Marma, Headman, District Headman Association, Rangamati

13. Mr. Aong Kyaja Chowdhury,Headman, Betbunia, Kawkhali, Rangamati

14. Mr. Jagadish Roaza, Headman Representative, Choto Panchari Mouza, Khagrachari

15. Mr. Udayan Chakma, Assistant Engineer, CHTRDP-II, DPMO, Bandarban

16. Mr. Puspa Dhan Chakma, Assistant Engineer, CHTRDP-II, DPMO, Rangamati



19. Mr. Biplob Chakma, Executive Director, TAUNGYA, Rangamati

20. Mr. Ashok Kumar Chakma, Resettlement Specialist, TAUNGYA, Rangamati

21. Mr. Tanak Chakma, District Field Facilitator, TAUNGYA, Rangamati

22. Ms. Minu Chakma, District Field Facilitator, TAUNGYA, Rangamati

23. Ms. Papiya Chakma, District Filed Facilitator, TAUNGYA, Rangamati

24. Mr. Bimalendu Chakma, Project Manager, TAUNGYA, Rangamati

25. Mr. Rupayan Chakma, District Project Officer, TAUNGYA, Rangamati

26. Mr. Reetesh Roy, District Field Facilitator, TAUNGYA, Rangamati

27. Mr. Khanos Chakma, District Field Facilitator, TAUNGYA, Rangamati

28. Mr. Atanu Dewan, District Field Facilitator, TAUNGYA, Rangamati

29. Adv. Chanchy Chakma, Income Restoration Officer, TAUNGYA, Rangamati

30. Ms. Jinu Chakma, Monitoring and Documentation Officer, TAUNGYA, Rangamati

___________

Appendix-E

35

Appendix-F

Environmental Site Clearance Certificate

download 3.12 mb

Documents