Transcript
Page 1: 2014%NESEA% COMPETITION% - Holyoke Redevelopment · Cities like Holyoke with brutal winter weather can benefit from this trapped solar heat that would ultimately reduce heating costs

2014  NESEA  COMPETITION  

 

 

 

 

Gregory  Freeman,  Civil  Engineering  2014  

Yunjae  Sohn,  Architectural  Engineering  2016  

Worcester  Polytechinic  Institute  

2/3/2014  

WPI  ZERA  

Page 2: 2014%NESEA% COMPETITION% - Holyoke Redevelopment · Cities like Holyoke with brutal winter weather can benefit from this trapped solar heat that would ultimately reduce heating costs

  1  

Table  of  Contents  Table  of  Contents  ..................................................................................................................................  0  

Table  of  Figures  ....................................................................................................................................  2  

Table  of  Tables  ......................................................................................................................................  3  Introduction  ...........................................................................................................................................  4  ZERA  ....................................................................................................................................................................  6  Insulation  .........................................................................................................................................................................  10  Window  Selection  ........................................................................................................................................................  14  Passive  Systems  ............................................................................................................................................................  16  HVAC  ..................................................................................................................................................................................  20  Lighting  .............................................................................................................................................................................  21  

Other  Ways  to  Go  Green  .............................................................................................................................  22  Grey  Water  Systems  for  Landscape  Irrigation  ................................................................................................  22  Rainwater  Collection  for  Irrigation  ......................................................................................................................  23  

Structural  Considerations  ..........................................................................................................................  24  Apartment  Floors  .........................................................................................................................................................  25  Roof  ....................................................................................................................................................................................  27  Walls  ..................................................................................................................................................................................  27  Parking  Garage  ..............................................................................................................................................................  28  

Energy  Evaluation  ..............................................................................................................................  29  Solar  Energy  ...................................................................................................................................................  29  Wind  Energy  ...................................................................................................................................................  31  Design  Builder  Evaluation  .........................................................................................................................  32  

Cost  Evaluation  ...................................................................................................................................  34  

Works  Referenced  .............................................................................................................................  35    

Page 3: 2014%NESEA% COMPETITION% - Holyoke Redevelopment · Cities like Holyoke with brutal winter weather can benefit from this trapped solar heat that would ultimately reduce heating costs

  2  

Table  of  Figures  Figure  1  Percentage  of  U.S.  Energy  uses.  Source:  Buildings  Energy  Data  Book.  ...........................  4  Figure  2  Estimated  economic  potential  by  sector  for  global  mitigation  for  different  regions  

as  a  function  of  carbon  price  in  2030  from  bottom-­‐up  studies,  provided  by  IPCC.  More  information  about  this  graph  can  be  found  at  IPCC  publications  and  data  under  reports  section.  .................................................................................................................................................................  5  

Figure  3  Rendered  apartment  modules  of  Carlos  Vega  site,  south  facing  side  ..............................  6  Figure  4  Rendered  interior  living  space  lighted  only  by  daylighting  .................................................  7  Figure  5  Second  floor  floor  plan  with  dimensioning  .................................................................................  8  Figure  6  First  floor  floor  plan  for  Carlos  Vega  module  .............................................................................  9  Figure  7  U.S.  Residential  End-­‐Use  Energy  Consumption  of  2010  by  DOE,  March  2011.  ........  10  Figure  8  Semi-­‐exposed  Wall  structure.  CMU  filled  with  insulation  sheathed  by  gypsum  

boards.  The  insulation  could  also  be  replaced  by  any  batt  system  that  goes  underneath  the  finish.  R  value  around  25  ..................................................................................................................  11  

Figure  9  Exterior  wall  structure.  This  structure  has  R-­‐value  of  7.92m2K/W  or  R-­‐45  in  imperial  units.  ................................................................................................................................................  12  

Figure  10  Mechanism  of  low  emissivity  glass  provided  by  Jetson  Green.  ....................................  14  Figure  11  Pictures  of  SolarOr’s  BIPV  product,  BeeHive  PV.    Arrayed  in  cell-­‐like  formation  

(Left),  this  product  can  now  apply  PV  panels  in  aesthetically  pleasing  way  (Right).  ....  15  Figure  12  Ecotect  Analysis  2011  Psychrometric  Chart  for  Chicopee  Falls,  MA,    by  dry  bulb  

temperature  (x-­‐axis)  absolute  humidity  (y-­‐axis)  showing  the  comfort  zone  (marked  by  the  yellow  rectangle)  and  climate  data  for  Chicopee  Falls  (lighter  the  blue,  more  daily  averages)  .........................................................................................................................................................  17  

Figure  13  Psychrometric  Chart  for  Chicopee  Falls,  MA    with  extended  (red)  comfort  zone  (yellow)  through  the  use  of  passive  solar  heating  with  50%  glazing,  high  insulation,  and  average  solar  collector  effeiecny.  .................................................................................................  18  

Figure  14  Effects  on  the  internal  temperature  cycle  of  a  thermal  mass  ........................................  19  Figure  15  Psychrometric  Chart  of  Chicopee  Falls  showing  an  extended  (red)  comfort  zone  

(yellow)  through  the  use  of  a  thermal  mass  system  .....................................................................  20  Figure  16  Mechanism  of  Grey  Water  System  provided  by  Flotender.  ............................................  22  Figure  19  Average  annual  precipitation  and  total  monthly  precipitation  data  of  Holyoke  vs.  

U.S.  ......................................................................................................................................................................  23  Figure  18  Rainwater  Filter  Infiltration  System  mechanism  provided  by  Flotender.  ...............  24  Figure  23  Dimensions  of  the  third  floor  of  the  apartment  module  with  the  structural  

masonry  wall  positions  shown  in  red  .................................................................................................  26  Figure  24  Scissor  Truss  Finite  Element  Model  created  using  Matlab  with  units  in  inches  ...  27  Figure  16  Collector  efficiency:  second  order  curves.  Adapted  from  a  spreadsheet  by  Jan  Erik  

Nielsen,  Solar  Keymark,  European  Solar  Thermal  Industry  Federation,  2006.  ................  29  Figure  22  Annual  Energy  Output  of  BWC  EXCEL-­‐S  wind  turbine.  ....................................................  32  Figure  21  Temperature  and  Heat  Gains  graphs  provided  by  DesignBuilder.  .............................  33  Figure  22  Pie  Chart  of  the  estimated  construction  costs,  with  PV  panels  included  under  

"Other"  ..............................................................................................................................................................  34    

Page 4: 2014%NESEA% COMPETITION% - Holyoke Redevelopment · Cities like Holyoke with brutal winter weather can benefit from this trapped solar heat that would ultimately reduce heating costs

  3  

Table  of  Tables  Table  1  Positive  aspects  of  Thermax  Sheathing—polyisocyanurate  sheathing.  ........................  11  Table  2  Summarization  of  and  comparison  between  various  types  of  insulation.  ...................  13  Table  3  Specifications  of  Solarban  60  compared  to  standard  insulating  glass.  ..........................  15  Table  4  Comparison  between  various  types  of  lamps.  ..........................................................................  21  Table  5  Summary  of  the  Loadings  on  the  Structure  ...............................................................................  25  Table  5  Specifications  of  TitanPower  Plus  ..................................................................................................  29  Table  6  Data  constructed  from  PV  Watts,  a  performance  calculator  for  Grid-­‐Connected  PV  

Systems.  The  efficiency  of  converter  was  assumed  to  be  80%.  ...............................................  30  Table  8  Comparison  between  wind  energy  and  solar  energy.  ...........................................................  32  Table  9  Energy  consumption  per  floor.  Total  energy  consumed  by  a  module  should  be  

multiplied  by  a  factor  of  four  as  there  are  four  floors  per  module.  ........................................  32    

Page 5: 2014%NESEA% COMPETITION% - Holyoke Redevelopment · Cities like Holyoke with brutal winter weather can benefit from this trapped solar heat that would ultimately reduce heating costs

  4  

Introduction  We live in a period of ongoing energy crisis. As future leading professionals in

the field of architecture, it is our duty to ensure the new generation of buildings is energy

efficient. Buildings use up to 40 percent of our everyday energy use (Figure  1).

Considering that U.S. composes about 20% of world energy consumption, this figure is

substantial. Movement towards net-zero energy and passive architecture is necessary to

reduce use of nonrenewable energy and therefore reduce greenhouse gas emission. As

buildings consume considerable amount of energy, architectural field has abundant

possibility to save energy and increase efficiency (Figure  2). Following figure provided

by IPCC illustrates how much more potential buildings sector has as a function of carbon

price in 2030. looking at the economic potential at 20 percent increase in investment, it is

clear that with least amount of money, the building sector offers the most effective

investment to reduce greenhouse gas emission. Through competitions like Net-Zero

Energy Student Design Competition, the public can become more aware of the

possibilities created by a movement towards sustainable and passive architecture.

Figure  1  Percentage  of  U.S.  Energy  uses.  Source:  Buildings  Energy  Data  Book.  

Page 6: 2014%NESEA% COMPETITION% - Holyoke Redevelopment · Cities like Holyoke with brutal winter weather can benefit from this trapped solar heat that would ultimately reduce heating costs

  5  

Two centuries ago, Holyoke was built as one of the earliest planned industrial city and

and now it can be renewed as a regional economic force using sustainable energy design.

Holyoke was an early adopter of sustainable energy by harnessing the power of the Connecticut

Connecticut river, which provided cheap power to run Holyoke’s flourishing industries. As

As Holyoke’s industry flourished in 19th century by using this power but has since stagnated.

There is potential for this city to once again rise as an economic force by using newer forms of

sustainable energy. Because of its early history as a planned industrial city, the regular layout of

the city helps the transition toward becoming modern sustainable city.

Figure  2  Estimated  economic  potential  by  sector  for  global  mitigation  for  different  regions  as  a  function  of  carbon  price  in  2030  from  bottom-­‐up  studies,  provided  by  IPCC.  More  information  about  this  graph  can  be  found  at  IPCC  publications  and  data  under  reports  section.  

Page 7: 2014%NESEA% COMPETITION% - Holyoke Redevelopment · Cities like Holyoke with brutal winter weather can benefit from this trapped solar heat that would ultimately reduce heating costs

  6  

Figure  3  Rendered  apartment  modules  of  Carlos  Vega  site,  south  facing  side  

Page 8: 2014%NESEA% COMPETITION% - Holyoke Redevelopment · Cities like Holyoke with brutal winter weather can benefit from this trapped solar heat that would ultimately reduce heating costs

  7  

ZERA  Our  design  for  the  Carlos  Vegas  area  is  a  series  of  net  zero  energy  repeatable  

apartment  modules,  or  ZERA,(as  shown  in  Figure  3)  powered  by  solar  and  wind  energy.  

Each  module  is  a  four  story  apartment  complex  with  two  apartments  per  floor  (shown  in  

Figure  5  and  Figure  6).  The  apartment  modules  have  no  windows  on  the  east  and  west  

facing  facades  to  allow  for  side  by  side  construction  of  each  module  in  order  to  optimize  the  

use  of  the  site  space.  Currently  each  apartment  module  has  eight  apartments,  seven  two-­‐

bedroom  and  one  single  bedroom  apartments.  

The  natural  sustainable  energy  provided  the  sun  figures  prominently  in  ZERA  with  

the  sun  being  used  in  five  capacities,  lighting  (daylighting),  heating(solar  heating),  heat  

storage(thermal  mass),  hot  water  production(solar  panels),  and  energy  production(PV  

panels).  ZERA’s  focus  on  the  use  of  solar  energy  reduces  the  overall  energy  demands  of  

apartment  modules  and,  with  the  help  of  on-­‐site  wind  turbines,  creates  a  net-­‐zero  energy  

series  of  structures.    

Figure  4  Rendered  interior  living  space  lighted  only  by  daylighting  

Page 9: 2014%NESEA% COMPETITION% - Holyoke Redevelopment · Cities like Holyoke with brutal winter weather can benefit from this trapped solar heat that would ultimately reduce heating costs

  8  

One  of  the  most  important  aspects  of  ZERA  is  creating  thermal  barriers  

between  the  exterior  and  interior  climates,  while  keeping  a  sense  of  connection  

between  the  two.  We  accomplished  this  through  our  selection  of  insulation,  

windows,  and  window  placement.  

 Figure  5  Second  floor  floor  plan  with  dimensioning  

Page 10: 2014%NESEA% COMPETITION% - Holyoke Redevelopment · Cities like Holyoke with brutal winter weather can benefit from this trapped solar heat that would ultimately reduce heating costs

  9  

 Figure  6  First  floor  floor  plan  for  Carlos  Vega  module  

Page 11: 2014%NESEA% COMPETITION% - Holyoke Redevelopment · Cities like Holyoke with brutal winter weather can benefit from this trapped solar heat that would ultimately reduce heating costs

  10  

Insulation  Figure  7 shows that space heating and cooling takes up more than 50% of energy use, therefore

it is essential to have properly insulated house to conserve energy, especially in cooler climates

like Massachesetts. Insulation used in the exterior walls is polyisocyanurate insulated sheathing

as well as cellulosic fiber. Polyisocyanurate sheathing was chosen because its high R-Value to

thickness ratio allows for high insulation requiring a minimum of space. The product Thermax

Sheathing from The DOW Chemical Company helps us achieve the high total R-Value for

façade walls without increasing the thickness of them by significant amount.  

Figure  7  U.S.  Residential  End-­‐Use  Energy  Consumption  of  2010  by  DOE,  March  2011.  

Page 12: 2014%NESEA% COMPETITION% - Holyoke Redevelopment · Cities like Holyoke with brutal winter weather can benefit from this trapped solar heat that would ultimately reduce heating costs

  11  

 

 

Cellulosic fiber was chosen for its environmentally friendly aspect. If installation of

cellulosic fiber is not achievable, cotton batt is another green alternative. As both types of

insulations are made with recycled materials, either way it will be more environmentally friendly

than other options. With given structure, R-value for exterior wall is around R-45.

Table  1  Positive  aspects  of  Thermax  Sheathing—polyisocyanurate  sheathing.

Figure  8  Semi-­‐exposed  Wall  structure.  CMU  filled  with  insulation  sheathed  by  gypsum  boards.  The  insulation  could  also  be  replaced  by  any  batt  system  that  goes  underneath  the  finish.  R  value  around  25  

Page 13: 2014%NESEA% COMPETITION% - Holyoke Redevelopment · Cities like Holyoke with brutal winter weather can benefit from this trapped solar heat that would ultimately reduce heating costs

  12  

The walls that divide the living space from hall way is insulated by cellulosic

fiber that fills up CMUs. More detailed comparison between various types of insulation is

provided in Table  2. The flat roof will be treated similarly as the wall with 5-6 inches of cellulose or

wool insulation with 4 inches of polyisocyanurate insulation to greatly increase the R-

value. For the exterior flooring, having polyisocyanurate insulation in between the

underground garage and the first floor in between the concrete slab and the flooring will

help isolate the conditioned space from unconditioned space.

Figure  9  Exterior  wall  structure.  This  structure  has  R-­‐value  of  7.92m2K/W  or  R-­‐45  in  imperial  units.  

Page 14: 2014%NESEA% COMPETITION% - Holyoke Redevelopment · Cities like Holyoke with brutal winter weather can benefit from this trapped solar heat that would ultimately reduce heating costs

  13  

Table  2  Summarization  of  and  comparison  between  various  types  of  insulation.  

Categories   Types   R-­‐value   Uses   Pros   Cons   Water-­‐vapor   Source  

Fibrous  Insulation  

Batts/blankets  

Fiberglass  

.

2-­‐4.0  

 

Foundation-­‐  new  

construction  and  

retrofit  

Floor-­‐  new  

construction  and  

retrofit  

Wall-­‐  new  

construction  

Ceiling-­‐  new  

construction  and  

retrofit  

Easy  to  install  

Relatively  Inexpensive  

Can  withstand  high  

temperature  

Cotton  is  recycled  and  

nontoxic  

Fiberglass  resistance  to  

microbiological  attack  and  

chemicals  

 

If  not  isolated  from  

interior  correctly,  

fibers  could  cause  

breathing  problems  

Could  leave  holes  

and  gaps  where  air  

can  circulate  

Needs  to  be  flame  

resistant  if  were  to  

left  exposed  

Needs  to  be  

treated  with  

building  paper  as  

a  vapor  retarder  

Mehta,  

“Insulation:  

Materials  and  

Techniques.”  

“Building  

shell.”  “Types  

of  Insulation.”  

Rock  wool  

2

8-­‐3.7  

 

Cotton  3

2  

 

Loose-­‐fill  

Fiberglass   2.2-­‐3.6  

Wall-­‐  new  

construction  and  

retrofit  

Ceiling-­‐  new  

construction  and  

retrofit  

 

Easy  to  retrofit  

Seals  gaps  

Takes  much  energy  

to  produce  

Possible  

condensation  

Mehta,  

“Building  

shell.”  

Cellulosic  

fiber  

3

0-­‐3.7  

 

Easy  to  retrofit  

Recycled  Material.  When  

blown  in  wet,  the  mixture  

fills  in  gaps  and  seals  them,  

which  reduces  air  leakage  

and  infiltration.  When  

installed  dry,  can  be  used  to  

insulate  walls  as  long  as  it  

is  packed  tightly.  

Flame-­‐retardant.  

 

May  absorb  moisture  

“Building  

shell.”  

“Insulation:  

Materials  and  

Techniques.”  

Rock  wool  

2

8-­‐3.7  

 

Easy  to  retrofit  

Seals  gaps  

Great  acoustic  insulator  as  

well  

Requires  

waterproofing  

“Building  

shell.”  

“Insulation:  

Materials  and  

Techniques.”  

Granular  Insulation  

Rigid  boards  

Perlite  .

5-­‐3.7  Exterior  insulation  

and  finish  systems  

wall  systems  

EPS  boards  has  to  

be  modified  to  be  

fire-­‐safe  according  

to  ASTM  E  84.  

Insulating  efficient  

Perlite-­‐  Noncombustible  

High  resistance  to  substrate  

corrosion  

EPS  –  lighter  in  weight  

Inability  to  

withstand  high  

temperatures  

Only  effective  when  

it  is  dry  

Break  down  when  

exposed  to  sunlight  

EPS  combustible  

Permeable  to  

water  since  it’s  

beaded  

Impurities  can  

absorb  water  

Dries  slowly-­‐  

Needs  asphalt  

water  repellent  

treatment  

Also  can  be  

treated  with  

silicone  when  

processing  

*moi

stures  cause  the  

granules  to  settle  

Mehta  

“Table  of  

Insulation  

Material.”  

 

Expanded  

polystyrene  (EPS)  

5

0  

Insulating  

Concrete  

Perlite  .

7-­‐3.13  

Insulating  

concrete  wall,  flat  

roof  

Bonds  well  to  most  roof  

substrates  

High-­‐wind-­‐uplift  resistance  

Fire  resistance  

Easy  sloping  to  drains  

Lower-­‐R  value  

compared  to  others  

Heat  travels  through  

solid  part  of  the  

block.  

 

Vermiculite  2

08-­‐2.44  

Page 15: 2014%NESEA% COMPETITION% - Holyoke Redevelopment · Cities like Holyoke with brutal winter weather can benefit from this trapped solar heat that would ultimately reduce heating costs

  14  

down  

Foamed  Insulation  

Rigid  boards  

Extruded  

polystyrene  

5  

 

Foundation-­‐  new  

construction  and  

retrofit  

Wall-­‐  new  

construction  and  

retrofit  

Ceiling-­‐  new  

construction  and  

retrofit  

Resistant  to  fungal  growth  

and  chemical  

decomposition  

Highest  available  R-­‐values  

per  inch  

Expensive,  

Carpenter  ants  and  

thermites  creates  

cavities  

 

High  resistance  

to  water  and  

water  vapor  

penetration  

Mehta,  

“Building  

shell.”  “Types  

of  Insulation.”  

polyisocyanu

rate  

5

6-­‐7.7  

 

“Building  

shell.”  

“Insulation:  

Materials  and  

Techniques.”  

spray-­‐in   Polyurethane  

5

.6-­‐6.8  

 

Wall-­‐  

new  construction  

and  retrofit  

Ceiling

-­‐  new  construction  

and  retrofit  

Roof-­‐  

new  construction  

and  retrofit  

Seals  gaps  and  control  

leakage.  Prevents  moisture  

transmission  the  best  

Highest  available  R-­‐values  

per  inch  

 

Carpente

r  ants  and  thermite  

 

“Building  

shell.”  

“Insulation:  

Materials  and  

Techniques.”  

Concrete  

Portland  cement  

with  water  and  

liquid  foaming  

concentrate  

3

9  

Roof  insulation,  

walls  

Higher  resistivity  than  

Insulating  concrete  

Nontoxic  

Nonflammable  

Vulnerable  to  insects  

Needs  waterproof  

treatment    

Mehta,  “Types  

of  Insulation.”  

Window  Selection  All the windows installed in northern façade are Solarban 60 solar control Low-e

Glass, the product of PPG Glass Technology. These windows are made from coating low

emissivity silver and metal oxide layers on glass surface. These coatings improve the

Figure  10  Mechanism  of  low  emissivity  glass  provided  by  Jetson  Green.

Page 16: 2014%NESEA% COMPETITION% - Holyoke Redevelopment · Cities like Holyoke with brutal winter weather can benefit from this trapped solar heat that would ultimately reduce heating costs

  15  

insulation value of window panes by reducing radiant heat transfer through the window. The

interior floors act as a thermal mass by absorbing the heat from direct sunlight that travels

through window. The heat is released energy at a later time as long-wavelength electromagnetic

radiation which the low-e coatings traps within the structure, reducing the heating load on the

HVAC systems. Cities like Holyoke with brutal winter weather can benefit from this trapped

solar heat that would ultimately reduce heating costs. Low-e insulating glasses, depending on the

location, reduce the heating costs up to 3 times less. Also it is possible to stop the passive heat

gain during the warmer summer months by using louvers, which would block the solar radiation

while allowing the summer breeze to enter. Following table illustrates the benefits of Solarban

60 Insulating Glass Unit by juxtaposing its specifications with standard Insulating Glass Unit. Table  3  Specifications  of  Solarban  60  compared  to  standard  insulating  glass.  

Figure  11  Pictures  of  SolarOr’s  BIPV  product,  BeeHive  PV.    Arrayed  in  cell-­‐like  formation  (Left),  this  product  can  now  apply  PV  panels  in  aesthetically  pleasing  way  (Right).

Page 17: 2014%NESEA% COMPETITION% - Holyoke Redevelopment · Cities like Holyoke with brutal winter weather can benefit from this trapped solar heat that would ultimately reduce heating costs

  16  

Windows located at kitchen and parts of curtain wall in living area can be built

with SolarOr’s BIPV product, BeeHive PV. As the PV panels should be sufficient to

meet the energy need for the model, this product is an option available for higher end

design. This product’s name comes from its structure of honeycomb made with acrylic

solar panels. The beehive structure allows “optimal allocation of the solar cells so that the

panels simultaneously to pass light but also to concentrate on the PV.” Each cell of the

beehive structure is filled with silicon that supports the PV cell. The adjustment of

amount of silicon filling enables angle of PV cells to be adjusted accordingly for various

sites. Furthermore, the filling also functions as a prism that magnifies the sunlight. This

technology provides an energy saving alternative compared to conventional curtain walls.

SolarOr’s BIPV module not only produces sustainable energy with maximum power per

square meter of about 155 Watts, but also provides thermal insulation with U-value of .2-

.35 as well as acoustic insulation.

Passive  Systems  The  passive  systems  are  used  to  reduce  the  loads  on  the  HVAC  system  and  

create  a  connection  between  the  interior  and  exterior  spaces,  while  not  increasing  

the  energy  demands  of  the  building.  ZERA  uses  two  passive  systems,  solar  heating,  

and  thermal  mass.  These  systems  were  chosen  using  psychometric  chart  function  of  

Ecotect  Analysis  2011  using  climate  data  from  the  town  of  Chicopee  Falls,  MA  which  

is  nearby  Holyoke.  

Page 18: 2014%NESEA% COMPETITION% - Holyoke Redevelopment · Cities like Holyoke with brutal winter weather can benefit from this trapped solar heat that would ultimately reduce heating costs

  17  

 

As  seen  in  Figure  12,  the  climate  of  Holyoke  is  mostly  more  humid  and  colder  than  

the  target  comfort  zone.  Every  data  point  outside  the  comfort  zone  indicates  a  HVAC  

burden,  so  by  using  passive  systems  to  extend  the  target  zone,  we  reduce  the  HVAC  loading.  

 

Solar  Heating  Solar  heating  is  harnessing  the  energy  of  the  sun  to  heat  interior  spaces,  especially  

during  the  winter  months.  ZERA  has  high  insulation  and  is  about  50%    glazing  on  the  South  

Figure  12  Ecotect  Analysis  2011  Psychrometric  Chart  for  Chicopee  Falls,  MA,    by  dry  bulb  temperature  (x-­‐axis)  absolute  humidity  (y-­‐axis)  showing  the  comfort  zone  (marked  by  the  yellow  rectangle)  and  climate  data  for  Chicopee  Falls  (lighter  the  blue,  more  daily  averages)  

Page 19: 2014%NESEA% COMPETITION% - Holyoke Redevelopment · Cities like Holyoke with brutal winter weather can benefit from this trapped solar heat that would ultimately reduce heating costs

  18  

facing  façade.  By  inputting  these  variables  into  the  Ecotect  program  we  get  Figure  

13,  which  shows  a  large  increase  the  temperature  and  humidity  range  that  can  be  

considered  “comfortable”  by  occupants.  

 

 

To stop thermal gains during summer months when using passive solar heating,

the occupant’s use of curtains, louvers, or other solar blocking methods is promoted.

Figure  13  Psychrometric  Chart  for  Chicopee  Falls,  MA    with  extended  (red)  comfort  zone  (yellow)  through  the  use  of  passive  solar  heating  with  50%  glazing,  high  insulation,  and  average  solar  collector  effeiecny.  

Page 20: 2014%NESEA% COMPETITION% - Holyoke Redevelopment · Cities like Holyoke with brutal winter weather can benefit from this trapped solar heat that would ultimately reduce heating costs

  19  

Thermal  Mass  Materials,  such  as  concrete,  naturally  absorb  the  energy  of  the  sun  and  release  it  at  a  

later  point.  Thermal  Mass  design  uses  this  material  property  to  reduce  the  heating  loads  

during  night  hours.  Thermal  masses  effectively  reduce  the  amplitude  of  the  natural  heat  

cycles  of  a  structure,  as  shown  in  Figure  14    

 Figure  14  Effects  on  the  internal  temperature  cycle  of  a  thermal  mass  

Our  thermal  mass  material  is  concrete  because  its  high  volumetric  heat  capacity  

(1940  kj/m2)  and  its  structural  properties.  This  allows  us  to  use  concrete  slabs  as  a  dual  

purpose  material.The  maximum  effective  depth  for  a  concrete  thermal  mass  is  about  4  

inches  thick,  but  due  to  structural  consideration  the  concrete  slabs  are  9  inches  and  13  

inches  thick.  The  effects  of  a  thermal  mass  alone  can  be  seen  in  Figure  14  

Page 21: 2014%NESEA% COMPETITION% - Holyoke Redevelopment · Cities like Holyoke with brutal winter weather can benefit from this trapped solar heat that would ultimately reduce heating costs

  20  

 

 

HVAC  Carlos Vega is a residential building with eight apartment units. The building has

average shell insulation and good window insulation. The design and orientation of the

building envelope is in favor of energy saving and the goal for the building is to be

designed as “net-zero”. Therefore, the HVAC system selection is designed to achieve

those goals.

There are a couple of factors to consider for HVAC system selection: building

electric capacity, building zoning, and domestic hot water resources. Building heating

and cooling loads will not affect system selection because the loads are always the same

regardless what system to use.

Figure  15  Psychrometric  Chart  of  Chicopee  Falls  showing  an  extended  (red)  comfort  zone  (yellow)  through  the  use  of  a  thermal  mass  system  

Page 22: 2014%NESEA% COMPETITION% - Holyoke Redevelopment · Cities like Holyoke with brutal winter weather can benefit from this trapped solar heat that would ultimately reduce heating costs

  21  

The HVAC system for the Carlos Vega Module is going to be water source heat pump

(WSHP). This system has the advantage of allowing winter cooling, feasible damper zoning, and

flexible equipment location (could be horizontal or vertical). The essential positive aspect that

sets WSHP system apart from others is that it balances and recovers wasted energy in the

building. It cools and heats simply by redistributing the existing energy at places where it is

needed. Cities like Holyoke requires vast amount of heating. In this kind of setting, WSHP runs

under cold weather operating mode in which “heat is provided to each individual unit from the

water of the loop. If more heat is needed than is naturally in the loop water, an energy efficient

fluid heater attached to the loop is required” (http://www.climatemaster.com/commercial-

watersource).

Our product of choice, Trane Axiiom Water-Source Heat Pumps has high efficiency of

up to 40 EER. This high efficient model will help us reduce amount of energy used for heating

and cooling and therefore achieve are goal of net zero energy house.

Lighting  After  HVAC  and  DHWL,  lightings  take  up  considerable  the  amount  of  energy  used.  

Most  old  apartments  around  New  England  still  use  incandescent  lamps  and  the  rest  uses  

fluorescent  lamps.  Even  though  fluorescent  lamps  are  significantly  more  efficient  than  

incandescent  lamps,  In  order  to  achieve  zero-­‐energy  goal,  something  even  more  efficient  is  

necessary.  New  technologies,  such  as  LED  and  OLED,  enables  us  to  achieve  such  goal  high  

efficiency  lighting  systems  provide  the  same  amount  of  lumens    while  using  80  percent  less  

energy  used  compared  to  traditional  incandescent.    

Table  4  Comparison  between  various  types  of  lamps.  

Page 23: 2014%NESEA% COMPETITION% - Holyoke Redevelopment · Cities like Holyoke with brutal winter weather can benefit from this trapped solar heat that would ultimately reduce heating costs

  22  

Other  Ways  to  Go  Green  

Grey  Water  Systems  for  Landscape  Irrigation  As  the  population  density  is  quite  high  due  to  the  characteristic  of  a  multi-­‐

family  apartment  unit,  grey  water  recycling  system  for  gardening  purposes  would  

help  saving  water  cost.  Grey  water—water  used  from  bathroom  sinks,  showers  and  

washing  machine—can  be  reused  to  water  gardens,  flush  toilets  and  wash  clothes.  

However,  grey  water  needs  to  be  treated  with  chemicals  to  be  used  for  toilets  or  to  

wash  clothes  for  hygienic  reasons,  in  ZERA  the  grey  water  collected  will  be  used  for  

gardens  for  simplicity  of  design.    While  pollutants  in  “grey  water  do  damage  to  

aquatic  life”  when  they  enter  streams  or  river,  “when  used  to  irrigate,  soil  breaks  

down  these  […]  and  transforms  them  into  nutrients  for  the  plants.”Recycling  grey  

water  will  make  our  design  more  sustainable  and  environmentally  friendly.  

Flotender  provides  various  grey  water  system  suitable  for  residential  units.  

 Figure  16  Mechanism  of  Grey  Water  System  provided  by  Flotender.  

Page 24: 2014%NESEA% COMPETITION% - Holyoke Redevelopment · Cities like Holyoke with brutal winter weather can benefit from this trapped solar heat that would ultimately reduce heating costs

  23  

Rainwater  Collection  for  Irrigation  Another  option  to  consider  is  rainwater  harvesting.  According  to  Holyoke’s  weather  

file,  its  annual  average  precipitation  is  49.90  inches,  which  is  way  above  national  average  of  

38.67  inches.  Utilizing  the  natural  resource  on  site  rather  than  paying  for  potable  water  for  

gardening  purpose  that  does  not  require  high  quality  water  would  not  only  help  reducing  

water  bill  but  also  make  the  design  more  sustainable.      

As  the  Carlos  Vega  lot  runs  through  entire  block,  harvesting  runoff  would  provide  us  

tremendous  amount  of  water  that  we  can  use  for  the  garden.  As  the  entrance  to  the  garage  

will  be  at  an  angle,  harvesting  water  that  will  naturally  run  down  the  slope  would  be  

feasible.  Another  way  to  collect  rainwater  is  from  roof  gutter.    As  ZERA  has  vast  roof  space,  

amount  of  rainwater  we  could  collect  from  the  roof  would  be  more  than  enough  for  

gardening  purposes.  Flotender,  the  company  referred  for  grey  water  product,  also  provides  

various  types  of  water  tanks  that  could  be  used  for  the  design.  

Figure  17  Average  annual  precipitation  and  total  monthly  precipitation  data  of  Holyoke  vs.  U.S.  

Page 25: 2014%NESEA% COMPETITION% - Holyoke Redevelopment · Cities like Holyoke with brutal winter weather can benefit from this trapped solar heat that would ultimately reduce heating costs

  24  

 Figure  18  Rainwater  Filter  Infiltration  System  mechanism  provided  by  Flotender.  

Structural  Considerations  From  those  documents  these  following  Load  Resistance  Factor  Design  

(LRFD)  loading  combinations  (LC)  were  used  (State  Board  of  Building  Regulations  

and  Standards  2008a).    

Load  Combination  1  (LC1)  (1.2)  Dead  Loading  +  (1.6)  Snow  Loading  +  (0.5)  

Live  Loading  

Load  Combination  2  (LC2)  (1.2)  Dead  Loading  +  (1.0)  Wind  Loading  +  (0.5)  

Live  Loading  +  (0.5)  Snow  Loading  

Load  Combination  3  (LC3)  (1.2)  Dead  Loading  +  (1.6)  Live  Loading  +  (0.5)  

Snow  Loading    

Load  Combination  4  (LC4)  (1.2)  Dead  Loading  +  (1.0)  Earthquake  Loading  

LC  1  governed  the  design  of  roof  members.LC2  governs  the  horizontal  wind  

loading.LC3  governed  the  floors,  and  LC4  governed  for  the  whole  structure  under  

seismic  loading.    

Here  are  the  loadings  on  the  structure  

Page 26: 2014%NESEA% COMPETITION% - Holyoke Redevelopment · Cities like Holyoke with brutal winter weather can benefit from this trapped solar heat that would ultimately reduce heating costs

  25  

Table  5  Summary  of  the  Loadings  on  the  Structure  

Dead  loads      

  Roofing   2.0  psf  

  Solar  Panels   4.0  psf  

  Hardwood   4.0  psf  

  Soil   60  pcf  

Live  Loads      

  Apartments  (and  the  spaces  leading  to  

Apartments)  

40.0  psf  

  Garage  (passenger  vehicles  only)   40.0  psf  

  Roof   20.0  psf  

  Elevator   300  lbs  

  Public  assembly/Retail  first  floor   100  psf  

Wind  Loads     100  mph  

    23  psf  

 

The  building  site  is  an  exposure  B  for  an  urban  environment,  Importance  Factor  of  

1.0,  a  Ss  factor  of  0.23,  and  a  S1  factor  of  0.066.The  maximum  horizontal  deflection  limit  

used  is  L/360.  

Apartment  Floors  The  floors  of  the  apartments  are  made  of  concrete  slabs  of  9  inch  thickness.  

Concrete  was  chosen  as  the  structural  material  for  the  floors  so  they  could  act  as  a  thermal  

mass,  lowing  the  overall  heating  costs  of  the  structure.  Since  the  maximum  effective  

thickness  for  a  concrete  slab  acting  as  a  thermal  mass  is  4  inches,  since  the  designed  slab  is  

more  than  that  the  apartment  will  receive  the  maximum  thermal  benefits  of  a  thermal  mass  

system.  The  slab  is  larger  than  4  inches  due  to  the  structural  loading  on  the  apartment  

flooring.  Because  of  the  positions  of  the  structural  masonry  walls,  shown  in  Figure  19  the  

slab  is  assumed  to  act  as  a  one  way  slab.  The  Loading  combination  used  was  LC  1  and,  using  

typical  concrete  of  6000  psi  compressive  strength,  a  slab  of  8.57  inches  is  required,  this  

Page 27: 2014%NESEA% COMPETITION% - Holyoke Redevelopment · Cities like Holyoke with brutal winter weather can benefit from this trapped solar heat that would ultimately reduce heating costs

  26  

was  rounded  to  9  inches  for  ease  of  construction.  The  deflection  assumed  in  this  

design  is  0.20  inches,  which  is  much  less  than  the  required  0.933  inches.    

       

Figure  19  Dimensions  of  the  third  floor  of  the  apartment  module  with  the  structural  masonry  wall  positions  shown  in  red  

Page 28: 2014%NESEA% COMPETITION% - Holyoke Redevelopment · Cities like Holyoke with brutal winter weather can benefit from this trapped solar heat that would ultimately reduce heating costs

  27  

Roof  The  roof  is  held  up  by  scissor  trusses  spaced  every  11  ft  shown  in  Figure  20  and  was  

designed  using  LC1.  The  truss  is  made  of  12x12  beams  of  structural  select  Douglas  Fir.  

Under  LC1  the  scissor  truss  deforms  under  0.05  inches,  well  below  the  deflection  

limit  of  0.667  inches.  The  American  Wood  Council  states  that  the  highest  load  per  linear  

foot  that  a  12x12  beam  can  resist  in  a  415  lbs  per  linear  foot  load,  the  highest  loading  is  

410  lbs  per  linear  foot.  

Walls  The  structural  walls  are  masonry  made  of  12  inch  fully  grouted  Concrete  Masonry  

Units.  The  east  and  west  walls,  and  the  central  wall  of  the  module  are  bearing  walls,  

positions  shown  in  Figure  19.  The  walls  are  resisting  LC2  which  create  a  moment  and  axial  

load  on  the  walls.  The  nominal  tension  stress  per  foot  the  CMUs  can  resist  is  180  psi  per  

foot.  The  LC2  creates  a  stress  of  134  psi.  

 

Figure  20  Scissor  Truss  Finite  Element  Model  created  using  Matlab  with  units  in  inches  

Page 29: 2014%NESEA% COMPETITION% - Holyoke Redevelopment · Cities like Holyoke with brutal winter weather can benefit from this trapped solar heat that would ultimately reduce heating costs

  28  

Parking  Garage  The  parking  garage  is  underground  and  part  extends  past  the  footprint  of  the  

rest  of  the  structure.  This  means  that  the  dead  loading  for  part  of  the  parking  

structure  includes  the  soil  above  the  structure.  A  foot  of  soil  above  was  assumed,  

and  since  the  parking  structure  is  below  the  communal  green  space,  the  live  loads  of  

a  place  of  public  assembly  were  used.  Since  the  live  loads  for  public  assembly  areas  

and  retail  spaces  are  the  same  (100psf),  this  design  consideration  also  allows  for  

conversion  of  the  first  floor  apartments  into  retail  spaces,  to  integrate  the  

commercial  and  residence  interests  of  the  area.  Using  the  same  method  as  

determining  the  apartment  slab,  the  required  garage  ceiling  slab  thickness  was  

determined  to  be  12.8  inches.  This  was  rounded  to  13  inches  for  ease  of  

construction  considerations.  

Page 30: 2014%NESEA% COMPETITION% - Holyoke Redevelopment · Cities like Holyoke with brutal winter weather can benefit from this trapped solar heat that would ultimately reduce heating costs

  29  

Energy  Evaluation  

Solar  Energy  

Production of hot water in household is essential. As it takes up almost 20 percent of

residential energy consumption, if all the hot water can be produced from reusable energy, total

energy load will reduce by significant amount. The design uses mixture of solar panels and PV

panels to meet the energy requirement. Out of two types of solar collectors, flat-plate collector

and evacuated-tube solar collectors are more efficient in cold climates due to its lower heat loss.

However, this advantage poses problem in snowy weathers. While snow slides off flat plates

easily with little bit of heat, snow clogs up around evacuated tube collectors and reduces its

efficiency. Furthermore, following graph shows varying efficiency of different types of solar

collectors depending on temperature difference. Assuming the hot water delivered to houses are

65°F, the flat plate collector remains more efficient until the difference of about 60°F. Average

temperature of Holyoke is 45.5°F with lowest average in January of 11.3°F. As the temperature

difference remains under 55°F( 65°-10°= 55°F) on average, in Holyoke weather, it is more

beneficial to have flat plate collectors. Furthermore, average annual snowfall of Holyoke is 68.13

inches, which is very high compared U.S. average of 23.27 inches. Considering these aspects,

ZERA uses flat plate collectors. TitanPower Plus SU2 Solar Flat Plate Collector by Silicon Solar

Figure  21  Collector  efficiency:  second  order  curves.  Adapted  from  a  spreadsheet  by  Jan  Erik  Nielsen,  Solar  Keymark,  European  Solar  Thermal  Industry  Federation,  2006.  

Table  6  Specifications  of  TitanPower  Plus

Page 31: 2014%NESEA% COMPETITION% - Holyoke Redevelopment · Cities like Holyoke with brutal winter weather can benefit from this trapped solar heat that would ultimately reduce heating costs

  30  

produces 0.176-0.617 gpm at tilt angle of 15-75 degrees. Considering that ideal tilt angle

for Holyoke is around 45° and our roof has 35° tilt, in calculation, I have assumed 0.5

gpm. Assuming that each person uses about 20 gallons of hot water and 4 people reside

per unit, total of 640 gallons of hot water is used per day per module.

20  𝑔𝑎𝑙𝑙𝑜𝑛𝑠

𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑠𝑜𝑛 ∗ 𝑑𝑎𝑦×  4  𝑝𝑒𝑜𝑝𝑙𝑒𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑡 ×  8

𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑡𝑚𝑜𝑑𝑢𝑙𝑒 = 640  𝑔𝑎𝑙𝑙𝑜𝑛𝑠  𝑝𝑒𝑟  𝑚𝑜𝑑𝑢𝑙𝑒  𝑝𝑒𝑟  𝑑𝑎𝑦

With 0.5 gpm of hot water production, assuming the panels receive sunlight for

10 hours per day, 5 panels of Titan Power will produce 1680 gallons of hot water per day

0.5𝑔𝑎𝑙𝑙𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑚𝑖𝑛 ×

60  𝑚𝑖𝑛1  ℎ𝑜𝑢𝑟 ×10  ℎ𝑜𝑢𝑟𝑠  ×  5  𝑝𝑎𝑛𝑒𝑙𝑠 = 1550  𝑔𝑎𝑙𝑙𝑜𝑛𝑠

Similar calculations can be made with 30 Evacuated Tube Collector, also a

product of Silicon Solar. This product produces 0.84 gallons/min. If snow load was

lighter, this product would be also a valuable option as its efficiencies stay over 70 %

even in freezing temperatures.

0.8𝑔𝑎𝑙𝑙𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑚𝑖𝑛 ×

60  𝑚𝑖𝑛1  ℎ𝑜𝑢𝑟 ×10  ℎ𝑜𝑢𝑟𝑠  ×  3  𝑝𝑎𝑛𝑒𝑙𝑠 = 1440  𝑔𝑎𝑙𝑙𝑜𝑛𝑠

Table  7  Data  constructed  from  PV  Watts,  a  performance  calculator  for  Grid-­‐Connected  PV  Systems.  The  efficiency  of  converter  was  assumed  to  be  80%.  

Page 32: 2014%NESEA% COMPETITION% - Holyoke Redevelopment · Cities like Holyoke with brutal winter weather can benefit from this trapped solar heat that would ultimately reduce heating costs

  31  

While similar amount of hot water can be produced with fewer amounts of panels, 30

Evacuated Tube Collector is more than twice expensive than Titan Power with unit price of

$1425.60 and $681.90 respectively.

The PV panels of choice were Sunpower’s E-19-320. This leading product’s nominal

power is 320 W. This product was chosen for its high efficiency and performance compared to

other products. For every module, about 120 PV panels can fit in the roof with 5 solar flat plates.  

These panels all together should be able to produce 53487 kW per year. As the unit price

of Sunpower E19 is estimated to be $850, it would cost approximately $102,000 per module. As

value of the energy saved is approximately $6,300, it would take about 16 years for this product

to pay for itself, which is while within the excepted occupancy life cycle of the apartments.

Wind  Energy  

To help offsetting amount of energy used with on-site generated energy, ZERA includes

small wind turbine that suits residential units. The most prominent disadvantage of solar energy

is that energy cannot be harvested during the night. Installing small wind turbine will

compensate this problem by providing energy needed at night. The turbine starts producing

energy roughly around 7 mph and as wind speed increases, output increases.

The selected product for our site is BWC EXCEL-S, made by Bergey Wind Power. This

10 kW unit has rotor diameter of 23 ft. and is typically on 80 or 100 foot towers. While the price

of this product cost about $48,000—$40,000 for equipment and the rest for installation—as a

Residential Renewable Energy Tax Credit worth 30% of the value of the system, it will cost

about $33,600. The Energy Improvement and Extension Act of 2008 (H.R. 1424) supports the

tax credit to small wind energy systems. Though the initial cost to install the wind turbines are

high, as Holyoke has an ideal wind speed for the wind energy farming, wind energy is a viable

option. Holyoke’s annual average wind speed is 18.59 mph, which is roughly 1.5 mph faster than

national average. According to the bar graph of annual energy output of BWC EXCEL-S

provided by Bergey Wind Power, annual energy output should be more than 32,388kWh, as

average wind speed of 16mph should provide that amount.

Page 33: 2014%NESEA% COMPETITION% - Holyoke Redevelopment · Cities like Holyoke with brutal winter weather can benefit from this trapped solar heat that would ultimately reduce heating costs

  32  

   Figure  22  Annual  Energy  Output  of  BWC  EXCEL-­‐S  wind  turbine.

While installation of wind turbine seems costly ($48,000 per unit), when

compared to solar panel by Yearly Energy Production per price, it is cheaper to meet the

energy needs with wind turbine. For annual production of 53,487kWh, total cost for 120

PV panels cost $102,000, costing $1.91 per 1 kWh. Each wind turbine has annual energy

output of 32,388kWh with $48,000, costing $1.46 per 1 kWh. Following table provides

further comparison of two renewable energy options. Table  8  Comparison  between  wind  energy  and  solar  energy.  

Wind Solar

Units needed to fulfill need of a

single module

2 129

Total Cost $96,000 $102,000

Total Energy Created 64,776kWh 53,487kWh

Cost per 1kWh of annual energy

output

$1.46 $1.91

Design  Builder  Evaluation  The focus of energy efficiency simulation was on HVAC and lighting system as

Table  9  Energy  consumption  per  floor.  Total  energy  consumed  by  a  module  should  be  multiplied  by  a  factor  of  four  as  there  are  four  floors  per  module.  

Page 34: 2014%NESEA% COMPETITION% - Holyoke Redevelopment · Cities like Holyoke with brutal winter weather can benefit from this trapped solar heat that would ultimately reduce heating costs

  33  

those two are major sector of residential energy consumption. The simulation was done on only

the third floor of the module as an example. Heating and cooling load was minimized by

reducing the heat exchange between upper and lower floor to zero, since the temperature

between houses should be the same, and minimizing the heat exchange between outside and

inside with R-values of super-insulated walls of the design. Even though the module’s HVAC

system is water source heat pump, simple fan coil unit was used to model as water source heat

pump was not an available option. Lighting factor was reduced by factor of two, as use of energy

efficient light source will enable the design to support same amount of lumen per area with less

amount of energy. As solar panels should be able to support DWH load, input for energy use to

heat water was set to zero. A module has an energy per total building area value of 74.15

kWh/m2 shows that each module is very energy efficient. Total energy used per floor is

estimated to be 13258kWh; meaning total energy used per module is roughly 53032 kWh (Table

9). However, since the real design has more efficient HVAC system, the projected energy use for

the design would actually be lower. As energy produced by PV panels are around 53487kWh

(Table 8), the module is expected to have net surplus of energy.

The energy performance of the design can be monitored and analyzed with following set

Figure  23  Temperature  and  Heat  Gains  graphs  provided  by  DesignBuilder.  

Page 35: 2014%NESEA% COMPETITION% - Holyoke Redevelopment · Cities like Holyoke with brutal winter weather can benefit from this trapped solar heat that would ultimately reduce heating costs

  34  

of graph. These graphs provide ideal performances of the system. First graph plots

varying temperature throughout a year compared to drastically varying outside dry-bulb

temperature, interior temperature stays constant around 18 °C. Whether actual HVAC

settings match the proposal can be determined by taking the temperature throughout the

year and compare it to the given graph.

Cost  Evaluation  

General construction cost was calculated through Revit’s schedule. Our calculations

show that each module should cost about $628,484 ($63.5 per sqft), including the underground

parking structure. This is rough cost estimate and it is most likely to cost more to build this

structure as parts like interior finish and excavation cost was not considered. However,

considering that our module houses 8 households and that building energy efficient house require

more expensive materials, the total cost is agreeable. Furthermore, Total cost of PV panels is

$102,000, which is almost 20 percent of the total construction. This cost will pay off within next

16 years by providing renewable energy on site. As 18 percent of the total cost will pay off, the

cost of construction is even more affordable.  

Figure  24  Pie  Chart  of  the  estimated  construction  costs,  with  PV  panels  included  under  "Other"  

Page 36: 2014%NESEA% COMPETITION% - Holyoke Redevelopment · Cities like Holyoke with brutal winter weather can benefit from this trapped solar heat that would ultimately reduce heating costs

  35  

Works  Referenced  American  Wood  Council.  (2012).  Wood  beams  safe  load  tables.  In  Retrieved  from  http://www.awc.org/pdf/WSDD/C2D.pdf    Bergey.  (2013).  Bergey  excel  10.  Retrieved  from  http://bergey.com/documents/2013/10/excel-­‐10-­‐spec-­‐sheet_2013.pdf      Breyer,  D.,  Fridley,  K.,  Cobeen,  K.,  &  Pollock,  D.  (2007).Design  of  wood  structures  asd/lrfd.  (6th  ed.)  New  York:  McGraw-­‐Hill.    “Building  Shell.”  Reliant.  2004  Platts,  a  division  of  The  McGraw-­‐Hill  Companies,  Inc.    24  Jan.  2013.  http://www.reliant.com/en_US/Platts/PDF/P_PA_45.pdf    “Chapter  5:  Insulation:  Materials  and  Techniques.”  University  of  Kentucky.  2013  An  Equal  Opportunity  University.  4  Mar    2010.  24  Jan  2013.  http://www.bae.uky.edu/energy/residential/guide/english/Chapter%205%20Insulation%20Materials%20and%20Techniques.pdf    Elovitz,  PE,  Kenneth.  "APARTMENT  BUILDING  HVAC  SYSTEM  OPTIONS."  (2013):  1-­‐9.    Klinger,  R.  (2010).  Masonry  structural  design.  New  York:  McGraw-­‐Hill    InspectAPedia.  2012  Copyright  InspectAPedia.com.  24  Jan  2013.  http://inspectapedia.com/Admin/Content_Use_Policy.htm    Jetson  Green.  (2012,  11  02).  Windows  with  energy  efficiency  in  mind.  Retrieved  from  http://www.jetsongreen.com/2012/11/window-­‐efficiency-­‐panes-­‐glazing-­‐gas-­‐options.html    La  Roche,  P.  (2012).  Carbon-­‐neutral  architectural  design.  (1st  ed.).  Boca  Raton:  CRC  Press.    Mehta,  Medan.  Building  Construction:  Principles,  Materials,  and  Systems.  Prentice  Hall,  2012.    Hardcover.    Nilson,  A.,  Darwin,  D.,  &  Dolan,  C.  (2010).  Design  of  concrete  structures.  (14th  ed.).  New  York:  McGraw-­‐Hill.    Silicon  Solar.  (2013).  Silicon  solar  products.  Retrieved  from  http://www.siliconsolar.com/shop/solar-­‐store/solar-­‐hot-­‐water-­‐heaters/    State  Board  of  Building  Regulations  and  Standards.  Massachusetts  Department  of  Public  Safety,  (2008).  780  cmr  53.00  building  planning  for  single-­‐  and  two-­‐family  dwellings.  Retrieved  from  website:  http://www.mass.gov/eopss/docs/dps/780-­‐cmr/780053a.pdf      

Page 37: 2014%NESEA% COMPETITION% - Holyoke Redevelopment · Cities like Holyoke with brutal winter weather can benefit from this trapped solar heat that would ultimately reduce heating costs

  36  

“Types  of  Insulation.”  Energy.gov.  30  May  2012.  24  Jan  2013.  http://energy.gov/energy  saver/articles/types-­‐insulation    USA.com.  (2014).  Holyoke,  ma  weather.  In  Retrieved  from  http://www.usa.com/holyoke-­‐ma-­‐weather.htm    

Page 38: 2014%NESEA% COMPETITION% - Holyoke Redevelopment · Cities like Holyoke with brutal winter weather can benefit from this trapped solar heat that would ultimately reduce heating costs

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Program Version:EnergyPlusDLL-OMP-32 7.2.0.006, 1/31/2014 6:15 PM

Tabular Output Report in Format: HTML

Building: Building

Environment: CARLOS VEGA ** Worchester Rgnl AP MA USA TMY3 WMO#=725095

Simulation Timestamp: 2014-01-31 18:15:54

Report: Annual Building Utility Performance Summary

For: Entire Facility

Timestamp: 2014-01-31 18:15:54

Values gathered over 8760.00 hours

Site and Source Energy

Total Energy [kWh] Energy Per Total Building Area [kWh/m2] Energy Per Conditioned Building Area [kWh/m2]

Total Site Energy 13258.76 74.15 74.15

Net Site Energy 13258.76 74.15 74.15

Total Source Energy 45708.66 255.61 255.61

Net Source Energy 45708.66 255.61 255.61

Site to Source Energy Conversion Factors

Site=>Source Conversion Factor

Electricity 3.167

Natural Gas 1.084

District Cooling 1.056

District Heating 3.613

Steam 0.300

Gasoline 1.050

Diesel 1.050

Coal 1.050

Fuel Oil #1 1.050

Fuel Oil #2 1.050

Propane 1.050

Building Area

Area [m2]

Total Building Area 178.82

Net Conditioned Building Area 178.82

Unconditioned Building Area 0.00

End Uses

Electricity [kWh] Natural Gas [kWh] Other Fuel [kWh] District Cooling [kWh] District Heating [kWh] Water [m3]

Heating 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10657.26 0.00

Cooling 0.00 0.00 0.00 491.88 0.00 0.00

Interior Lighting 1024.95 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Exterior Lighting 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Interior Equipment 1084.67 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Exterior Equipment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Fans 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Pumps 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Page 1 of 16Building CARLOS VEGA ** Worchester Rgnl AP MA USA TMY3 WMO#=725095 20...

2/3/2014file:///F:/Design%20Builder/Final%20Report.htm

Page 39: 2014%NESEA% COMPETITION% - Holyoke Redevelopment · Cities like Holyoke with brutal winter weather can benefit from this trapped solar heat that would ultimately reduce heating costs

Heat Rejection 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Humidification 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Heat Recovery 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Water Systems 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Refrigeration 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Generators 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Total End Uses 2109.62 0.00 0.00 491.88 10657.26 0.00Note: District heat appears to be the principal heating source based on energy usage.

End Uses By Subcategory

Subcategory Electricity [kWh]

Natural Gas [kWh]

Other Fuel [kWh]

District Cooling [kWh]

District Heating [kWh]

Water [m3]

Heating General 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10657.26 0.00

Cooling General 0.00 0.00 0.00 491.88 0.00 0.00

Interior Lighting ELECTRIC EQUIPMENT#Block1:Bed22Room#TaskLights 37.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

ELECTRIC EQUIPMENT#Block1:Laundry2Room#TaskLights 0.51 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

ELECTRIC EQUIPMENT#Block1:Living2Room#GeneralLights 268.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

ELECTRIC EQUIPMENT#Block1:Living1Room#GeneralLights 386.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

ELECTRIC EQUIPMENT#Block1:Bed11Room#TaskLights 38.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

ELECTRIC EQUIPMENT#Block1:HallRoom#GeneralLights 101.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

ELECTRIC EQUIPMENT#Block1:Bed21Room#TaskLights 34.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

ELECTRIC EQUIPMENT#Block1:Toilet1Room#TaskLights 63.58 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

ELECTRIC EQUIPMENT#Block1:Bed12Room#TaskLights 29.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

ELECTRIC EQUIPMENT#Block1:Toilet2Room#TaskLights 64.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

ELECTRIC EQUIPMENT#Block1:Laundry1Room#TaskLights 1.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Exterior Lighting General 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Interior Equipment ELECTRIC EQUIPMENT#Block1:Laundry2Room#05 142.77 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

ELECTRIC EQUIPMENT#Block1:Living2Room#05 307.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

ELECTRIC EQUIPMENT#Block1:Living1Room#05 353.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

ELECTRIC EQUIPMENT#Block1:Laundry1Room#05 281.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Exterior Equipment General 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Fans Ventilation (simple) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Pumps General 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Heat Rejection General 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Humidification General 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Heat Recovery General 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Water Systems General 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Refrigeration General 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Generators General 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Normalized Metrics

Utility Use Per Conditioned Floor Area

Electricity Intensity [kWh/m2]

Natural Gas Intensity [kWh/m2]

Other Fuel Intensity [kWh/m2]

District Cooling Intensity [kWh/m2]

District Heating Intensity [kWh/m2]

Water Intensity [m3/m2]

Page 2 of 16Building CARLOS VEGA ** Worchester Rgnl AP MA USA TMY3 WMO#=725095 20...

2/3/2014file:///F:/Design%20Builder/Final%20Report.htm

Page 40: 2014%NESEA% COMPETITION% - Holyoke Redevelopment · Cities like Holyoke with brutal winter weather can benefit from this trapped solar heat that would ultimately reduce heating costs

Lighting 5.73 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

HVAC 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.75 59.60 0.00

Other 6.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Total 11.80 0.00 0.00 2.75 59.60 0.00

Utility Use Per Total Floor Area

Electricity Intensity [kWh/m2]

Natural Gas Intensity [kWh/m2]

Other Fuel Intensity [kWh/m2]

District Cooling Intensity [kWh/m2]

District Heating Intensity [kWh/m2]

Water Intensity [m3/m2]

Lighting 5.73 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

HVAC 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.75 59.60 0.00

Other 6.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Total 11.80 0.00 0.00 2.75 59.60 0.00

Electric Loads Satisfied

Electricity [kWh] Percent Electricity [%]

Fuel-Fired Power Generation 0.00 0.00

High Temperature Geothermal* 0.00 0.00

Photovoltaic Power 0.00 0.00

Wind Power 0.00 0.00

Net Decrease in On-Site Storage 0.00 0.00

Total On-Site Electric Sources 0.00 0.00

Electricity Coming From Utility 2109.62 100.00

Surplus Electricity Going To Utility 0.00 0.00

Net Electricity From Utility 2109.62 100.00

Total On-Site and Utility Electric Sources 2109.62 100.00

Total Electricity End Uses 2109.62 100.00

On-Site Thermal Sources

Heat [kWh] Percent Heat [%]

Water-Side Heat Recovery 0.00

Air to Air Heat Recovery for Cooling 0.00

Air to Air Heat Recovery for Heating 0.00

High-Temperature Geothermal* 0.00

Solar Water Thermal 0.00

Solar Air Thermal 0.00

Total On-Site Thermal Sources 0.00

Water Source Summary

Water [m3] Percent Water [%]

Rainwater Collection 0.00 -

Condensate Collection 0.00 -

Groundwater Well 0.00 -

Total On Site Water Sources 0.00 -

- - -

Initial Storage 0.00 -

Final Storage 0.00 -

Change in Storage 0.00 -

- - -

Water Supplied by Utility 0.00 -

Page 3 of 16Building CARLOS VEGA ** Worchester Rgnl AP MA USA TMY3 WMO#=725095 20...

2/3/2014file:///F:/Design%20Builder/Final%20Report.htm

Page 41: 2014%NESEA% COMPETITION% - Holyoke Redevelopment · Cities like Holyoke with brutal winter weather can benefit from this trapped solar heat that would ultimately reduce heating costs

Table of Contents

- - -

Total On Site, Change in Storage, and Utility Water Sources 0.00 -

Total Water End Uses 0.00 -

Comfort and Setpoint Not Met Summary

Degrees [deltaC]

Tolerance for Time Heating Setpoint Not Met 0.20

Tolerance for Time Cooling Setpoint Not Met 0.20

Facility [Hours]

Time Setpoint Not Met During Occupied Heating 0.00

Time Setpoint Not Met During Occupied Cooling 0.00

Time Not Comfortable Based on Simple ASHRAE 55-2004 7941.50

Note 1: An asterisk (*) indicates that the feature is not yet implemented.

Table of Contents

TopAnnual Building Utility Performance SummaryInput Verification and Results SummaryComponent Sizing SummaryClimatic Data SummaryEnvelope SummaryLighting SummaryEquipment SummaryHVAC Sizing SummarySystem SummaryOutdoor Air SummaryObject Count SummarySensible Heat Gain Summary

Report: Input Verification and Results Summary

For: Entire Facility

Timestamp: 2014-01-31 18:15:54

General

Value

Program Version and Build EnergyPlusDLL-OMP-32 7.2.0.006, 1/31/2014 6:15 PM

RunPeriod CARLOS VEGA

Weather File Worchester Rgnl AP MA USA TMY3 WMO#=725095

Latitude [deg] 42.27

Longitude [deg] -71.9

Elevation [m] 300.00

Time Zone -5.0

North Axis Angle [deg] 0.00

Rotation for Appendix G [deg] 0.00

Hours Simulated [hrs] 8760.00

ENVELOPE

Window-Wall Ratio

Total North (315 to 45 deg) East (45 to 135 deg) South (135 to 225 deg) West (225 to 315 deg)

Gross Wall Area [m2] 146.34 41.52 31.81 41.36 31.65

Window Opening Area [m2] 33.35 10.31 0.00 23.04 0.00

Window-Wall Ratio [%] 22.79 24.84 0.00 55.70 0.00

Page 4 of 16Building CARLOS VEGA ** Worchester Rgnl AP MA USA TMY3 WMO#=725095 20...

2/3/2014file:///F:/Design%20Builder/Final%20Report.htm

Page 42: 2014%NESEA% COMPETITION% - Holyoke Redevelopment · Cities like Holyoke with brutal winter weather can benefit from this trapped solar heat that would ultimately reduce heating costs

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Conditioned Window-Wall Ratio

Total North (315 to 45 deg) East (45 to 135 deg) South (135 to 225 deg) West (225 to 315 deg)

Gross Wall Area [m2] 146.34 41.52 31.81 41.36 31.65

Window Opening Area [m2] 33.35 10.31 0.00 23.04 0.00

Window-Wall Ratio [%] 22.79 24.84 0.00 55.70 0.00

Skylight-Roof Ratio

Total

Gross Roof Area [m2] 178.78

Skylight Area [m2] 0.00

Skylight-Roof Ratio [%] 0.00

PERFORMANCE

Zone Summary

Area [m2]

Conditioned (Y/N)

Part of Total Floor Area

(Y/N)

Volume [m3] Multipliers Gross Wall

Area [m2]

Window Glass Area

[m2]

Lighting [W/m2]

People [m2 per person]

Plug and Process [W/m2]

BLOCK1:BED22ROOM 13.49 Yes Yes 32.89 1.00 19.56 0.95 2.0000 43.59 0.0000

BLOCK1:LAUNDRY2ROOM 2.19 Yes Yes 5.35 1.00 4.47 0.00 1.5000 11.69 20.0000

BLOCK1:LIVING2ROOM 43.78 Yes Yes 106.76 1.00 35.55 10.67 2.4000 53.32 2.0000

BLOCK1:LIVING1ROOM 50.36 Yes Yes 122.80 1.00 34.26 10.91 3.0000 53.32 2.0000

BLOCK1:BED11ROOM 14.02 Yes Yes 34.18 1.00 19.52 0.95 2.0000 43.59 0.0000

BLOCK1:HALLROOM 13.12 Yes Yes 31.98 1.00 2.91 0.00 2.0000 50.90 0.0000

BLOCK1:BED21ROOM 12.31 Yes Yes 30.00 1.00 7.14 0.95 2.0000 43.59 0.0000

BLOCK1:TOILET1ROOM 7.26 Yes Yes 17.70 1.00 5.08 0.54 3.0000 53.37 0.0000

BLOCK1:BED12ROOM 10.65 Yes Yes 25.98 1.00 8.15 1.90 2.0000 43.59 0.0000

BLOCK1:TOILET2ROOM 7.32 Yes Yes 17.86 1.00 5.11 0.54 3.0000 53.37 0.0000

BLOCK1:LAUNDRY1ROOM 4.32 Yes Yes 10.53 1.00 4.59 0.00 1.5000 11.69 20.0000

Total 178.82 436.04 146.34 27.41 2.4429 44.58 1.7814

Conditioned Total 178.82 436.04 146.34 27.41 2.4429 44.58 1.7814

Unconditioned Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Not Part of Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Report: Climatic Data Summary

For: Entire Facility

Timestamp: 2014-01-31 18:15:54

SizingPeriod:DesignDay

Maximum Dry Bulb [C]

Daily Temperature Range [deltaC]

Humidity Value

Humidity Type

Wind Speed [m/s]

Wind Direction

SUMMER DESIGN DAY IN CARLOS VEGA 29.50 9.00 21.90 Wetbulb [C] 0.00 0.00

WINTER DESIGN DAY IN CARLOS VEGA -17.00 0.00 -17.00 Wetbulb [C] 13.50 0.00

Weather Statistics File

Value

None

Report: Envelope Summary

Page 5 of 16Building CARLOS VEGA ** Worchester Rgnl AP MA USA TMY3 WMO#=725095 20...

2/3/2014file:///F:/Design%20Builder/Final%20Report.htm

Page 43: 2014%NESEA% COMPETITION% - Holyoke Redevelopment · Cities like Holyoke with brutal winter weather can benefit from this trapped solar heat that would ultimately reduce heating costs

For: Entire Facility

Timestamp: 2014-01-31 18:15:54

Opaque Exterior

Construction ReflectanceU-Factor

with Film [W/m2-K]

U-Factor no Film

[W/m2-K]

Gross Area [m2]

Azimuth [deg]

Tilt [deg]

Cardinal Direction

BLOCK1:BED22ROOM_WALL_2_0_0 OUTER WALL 0.22 0.126 0.129 11.77 90.00 90.00 E

BLOCK1:BED22ROOM_WALL_3_0_0 OUTER WALL 0.22 0.126 0.129 7.04 0.00 90.00 N

BLOCK1:BED22ROOM_WALL_5_1_0 OUTER WALL 0.22 0.126 0.129 0.25 180.00 90.00 S

BLOCK1:BED22ROOM_WALL_6_1_0 OUTER WALL 0.22 0.126 0.129 0.25 270.00 90.00 W

BLOCK1:BED22ROOM_WALL_7_2_0 OUTER WALL 0.22 0.126 0.129 0.25 180.00 90.00 S

BLOCK1:BED22ROOM_EXTFLOOR_0_0_0 PROJECT EXTERNAL FLOOR 0.30 0.084 0.085 3.39 0.00 180.00

BLOCK1:BED22ROOM_EXTFLOOR_0_0_1 PROJECT EXTERNAL FLOOR 0.30 0.084 0.085 10.10 0.00 180.00

BLOCK1:BED22ROOM_ROOF_1_0_0 PROJECT FLAT ROOF 0.15 0.070 0.071 1.20 180.00 0.00

BLOCK1:BED22ROOM_ROOF_1_0_1 PROJECT FLAT ROOF 0.15 0.070 0.071 12.29 180.00 0.00

BLOCK1:LAUNDRY2ROOM_WALL_2_0_0 OUTER WALL 0.22 0.126 0.129 4.47 90.00 90.00 E

BLOCK1:LAUNDRY2ROOM_EXTFLOOR_0_0_0 PROJECT EXTERNAL FLOOR 0.30 0.084 0.085 2.19 0.00 180.00

BLOCK1:LAUNDRY2ROOM_ROOF_1_0_0 PROJECT FLAT ROOF 0.15 0.070 0.071 2.19 180.00 0.00

BLOCK1:LIVING2ROOM_WALL_2_0_0 OUTER WALL 0.22 0.126 0.129 11.33 90.00 90.00 E

BLOCK1:LIVING2ROOM_WALL_3_1_0 OUTER WALL 0.22 0.126 0.129 0.25 0.00 90.00 N

BLOCK1:LIVING2ROOM_WALL_4_1_0 OUTER WALL 0.22 0.126 0.129 0.25 90.00 90.00 E

BLOCK1:LIVING2ROOM_WALL_6_1_0 OUTER WALL 0.22 0.126 0.129 0.25 0.00 90.00 N

BLOCK1:LIVING2ROOM_WALL_7_1_0 OUTER WALL 0.22 0.126 0.129 0.25 90.00 90.00 E

BLOCK1:LIVING2ROOM_WALL_8_2_0 OUTER WALL 0.22 0.126 0.129 0.25 0.00 90.00 N

BLOCK1:LIVING2ROOM_WALL_10_1_0 OUTER WALL 0.22 0.126 0.129 0.53 180.00 90.00 S

BLOCK1:LIVING2ROOM_WALL_11_1_0 OUTER WALL 0.22 0.126 0.129 0.53 270.00 90.00 W

BLOCK1:LIVING2ROOM_WALL_12_1_0 OUTER WALL 0.22 0.126 0.129 0.53 270.00 90.00 W

BLOCK1:LIVING2ROOM_WALL_13_1_0 OUTER WALL 0.22 0.126 0.129 0.53 0.00 90.00 N

BLOCK1:LIVING2ROOM_WALL_14_0_0 OUTER WALL 0.22 0.126 0.129 0.53 270.00 90.00 W

BLOCK1:LIVING2ROOM_WALL_17_0_0 OUTER WALL 0.22 0.126 0.129 0.88 180.00 90.00 S

BLOCK1:LIVING2ROOM_WALL_19_0_0 OUTER WALL 0.22 0.126 0.129 9.41 180.00 90.00 S

BLOCK1:LIVING2ROOM_WALL_20_0_0 OUTER WALL 0.22 0.126 0.129 0.36 90.00 90.00 E

BLOCK1:LIVING2ROOM_WALL_21_0_0 OUTER WALL 0.22 0.126 0.129 0.99 180.00 90.00 S

BLOCK1:LIVING2ROOM_WALL_23_0_0 OUTER WALL 0.22 0.126 0.129 0.25 180.00 90.00 S

BLOCK1:LIVING2ROOM_WALL_25_0_0 OUTER WALL 0.22 0.126 0.129 8.44 180.00 90.00 S

BLOCK1:LIVING2ROOM_EXTFLOOR_0_0_0 PROJECT EXTERNAL FLOOR 0.30 0.084 0.085 0.25 0.00 180.00

BLOCK1:LIVING2ROOM_EXTFLOOR_0_0_1 PROJECT EXTERNAL FLOOR 0.30 0.084 0.085 2.74 0.00 180.00

BLOCK1:LIVING2ROOM_EXTFLOOR_0_0_2 PROJECT EXTERNAL FLOOR 0.30 0.084 0.085 4.98 0.00 180.00

BLOCK1:LIVING2ROOM_EXTFLOOR_0_0_3 PROJECT EXTERNAL FLOOR 0.30 0.084 0.085 10.12 0.00 180.00

BLOCK1:LIVING2ROOM_EXTFLOOR_0_0_4 PROJECT EXTERNAL FLOOR 0.30 0.084 0.085 6.13 0.00 180.00

BLOCK1:LIVING2ROOM_EXTFLOOR_0_0_5 PROJECT EXTERNAL FLOOR 0.30 0.084 0.085 0.39 0.00 180.00

BLOCK1:LIVING2ROOM_EXTFLOOR_0_0_6 PROJECT EXTERNAL FLOOR 0.30 0.084 0.085 1.44 0.00 180.00

BLOCK1:LIVING2ROOM_EXTFLOOR_0_0_7 PROJECT EXTERNAL FLOOR 0.30 0.084 0.085 0.56 0.00 180.00

BLOCK1:LIVING2ROOM_EXTFLOOR_0_0_8 PROJECT EXTERNAL FLOOR 0.30 0.084 0.085 4.97 0.00 180.00

BLOCK1:LIVING2ROOM_EXTFLOOR_0_0_9 PROJECT EXTERNAL FLOOR 0.30 0.084 0.085 12.19 0.00 180.00

Page 6 of 16Building CARLOS VEGA ** Worchester Rgnl AP MA USA TMY3 WMO#=725095 20...

2/3/2014file:///F:/Design%20Builder/Final%20Report.htm

Page 44: 2014%NESEA% COMPETITION% - Holyoke Redevelopment · Cities like Holyoke with brutal winter weather can benefit from this trapped solar heat that would ultimately reduce heating costs

BLOCK1:LIVING2ROOM_ROOF_1_0_0 PROJECT FLAT ROOF 0.15 0.070 0.071 0.56 180.00 0.00

BLOCK1:LIVING2ROOM_ROOF_1_0_1 PROJECT FLAT ROOF 0.15 0.070 0.071 13.53 180.00 0.00

BLOCK1:LIVING2ROOM_ROOF_1_0_2 PROJECT FLAT ROOF 0.15 0.070 0.071 1.37 180.00 0.00

BLOCK1:LIVING2ROOM_ROOF_1_0_3 PROJECT FLAT ROOF 0.15 0.070 0.071 1.55 180.00 0.00

BLOCK1:LIVING2ROOM_ROOF_1_0_4 PROJECT FLAT ROOF 0.15 0.070 0.071 0.75 180.00 0.00

BLOCK1:LIVING2ROOM_ROOF_1_0_5 PROJECT FLAT ROOF 0.15 0.070 0.071 4.68 180.00 0.00

BLOCK1:LIVING2ROOM_ROOF_1_0_6 PROJECT FLAT ROOF 0.15 0.070 0.071 6.03 180.00 0.00

BLOCK1:LIVING2ROOM_ROOF_1_0_7 PROJECT FLAT ROOF 0.15 0.070 0.071 8.88 180.00 0.00

BLOCK1:LIVING2ROOM_ROOF_1_0_8 PROJECT FLAT ROOF 0.15 0.070 0.071 6.43 180.00 0.00

BLOCK1:LIVING1ROOM_WALL_3_0_0 OUTER WALL 0.22 0.126 0.129 0.25 180.00 90.00 S

BLOCK1:LIVING1ROOM_WALL_5_0_0 OUTER WALL 0.22 0.126 0.129 0.56 180.00 90.00 S

BLOCK1:LIVING1ROOM_WALL_6_0_0 OUTER WALL 0.22 0.126 0.129 0.36 270.00 90.00 W

BLOCK1:LIVING1ROOM_WALL_7_0_0 OUTER WALL 0.22 0.126 0.129 9.67 180.00 90.00 S

BLOCK1:LIVING1ROOM_WALL_9_0_0 OUTER WALL 0.22 0.126 0.129 0.44 180.00 90.00 S

BLOCK1:LIVING1ROOM_WALL_10_2_0 OUTER WALL 0.22 0.126 0.129 0.53 90.00 90.00 E

BLOCK1:LIVING1ROOM_WALL_11_1_0 OUTER WALL 0.22 0.126 0.129 0.53 0.00 90.00 N

BLOCK1:LIVING1ROOM_WALL_12_1_0 OUTER WALL 0.22 0.126 0.129 0.53 90.00 90.00 E

BLOCK1:LIVING1ROOM_WALL_13_1_0 OUTER WALL 0.22 0.126 0.129 0.21 90.00 90.00 E

BLOCK1:LIVING1ROOM_WALL_14_1_0 OUTER WALL 0.22 0.126 0.129 0.12 0.00 90.00 N

BLOCK1:LIVING1ROOM_WALL_15_0_0 OUTER WALL 0.22 0.126 0.129 0.28 90.00 90.00 E

BLOCK1:LIVING1ROOM_WALL_16_1_0 OUTER WALL 0.22 0.126 0.129 0.12 0.00 90.00 N

BLOCK1:LIVING1ROOM_WALL_16_1_1 OUTER WALL 0.22 0.126 0.129 0.16 0.00 90.00 N

BLOCK1:LIVING1ROOM_WALL_18_1_0 OUTER WALL 0.22 0.126 0.129 0.29 270.00 90.00 W

BLOCK1:LIVING1ROOM_WALL_19_1_0 OUTER WALL 0.22 0.126 0.129 0.25 270.00 90.00 W

BLOCK1:LIVING1ROOM_WALL_20_1_0 OUTER WALL 0.22 0.126 0.129 0.25 0.00 90.00 N

BLOCK1:LIVING1ROOM_WALL_21_0_0 OUTER WALL 0.22 0.126 0.129 11.33 270.00 90.00 W

BLOCK1:LIVING1ROOM_WALL_22_0_0 OUTER WALL 0.22 0.126 0.129 8.38 180.00 90.00 S

BLOCK1:LIVING1ROOM_EXTFLOOR_0_0_0 PROJECT EXTERNAL FLOOR 0.30 0.084 0.085 0.58 0.00 180.00

BLOCK1:LIVING1ROOM_EXTFLOOR_0_0_1 PROJECT EXTERNAL FLOOR 0.30 0.084 0.085 12.54 0.00 180.00

BLOCK1:LIVING1ROOM_EXTFLOOR_0_0_2 PROJECT EXTERNAL FLOOR 0.30 0.084 0.085 0.21 0.00 180.00

BLOCK1:LIVING1ROOM_EXTFLOOR_0_0_3 PROJECT EXTERNAL FLOOR 0.30 0.084 0.085 7.95 0.00 180.00

BLOCK1:LIVING1ROOM_EXTFLOOR_0_0_4 PROJECT EXTERNAL FLOOR 0.30 0.084 0.085 10.11 0.00 180.00

BLOCK1:LIVING1ROOM_EXTFLOOR_0_0_5 PROJECT EXTERNAL FLOOR 0.30 0.084 0.085 11.12 0.00 180.00

BLOCK1:LIVING1ROOM_EXTFLOOR_0_0_6 PROJECT EXTERNAL FLOOR 0.30 0.084 0.085 7.85 0.00 180.00

BLOCK1:LIVING1ROOM_ROOF_1_0_0 PROJECT FLAT ROOF 0.15 0.070 0.071 0.73 180.00 0.00

BLOCK1:LIVING1ROOM_ROOF_1_0_1 PROJECT FLAT ROOF 0.15 0.070 0.071 3.55 180.00 0.00

BLOCK1:LIVING1ROOM_ROOF_1_0_2 PROJECT FLAT ROOF 0.15 0.070 0.071 9.05 180.00 0.00

BLOCK1:LIVING1ROOM_ROOF_1_0_3 PROJECT FLAT ROOF 0.15 0.070 0.071 9.85 180.00 0.00

BLOCK1:LIVING1ROOM_ROOF_1_0_4 PROJECT FLAT ROOF 0.15 0.070 0.071 6.29 180.00 0.00

BLOCK1:LIVING1ROOM_ROOF_1_0_5 PROJECT FLAT ROOF 0.15 0.070 0.071 1.06 180.00 0.00

BLOCK1:LIVING1ROOM_ROOF_1_0_6 PROJECT FLAT ROOF 0.15 0.070 0.071 0.58 180.00 0.00

BLOCK1:LIVING1ROOM_ROOF_1_0_7 PROJECT FLAT ROOF 0.15 0.070 0.071 19.25 180.00 0.00

BLOCK1:BED11ROOM_WALL_2_1_0 OUTER WALL 0.22 0.126 0.129 0.20 120.33 90.00 E

BLOCK1:BED11ROOM_WALL_2_1_1 OUTER WALL 0.22 0.126 0.129 0.25 120.33 90.00 E

BLOCK1:BED11ROOM_WALL_4_0_0 OUTER WALL 0.22 0.126 0.129 7.42 0.00 90.00 N

BLOCK1:BED11ROOM_WALL_5_0_0 OUTER WALL 0.22 0.126 0.129 11.65 270.00 90.00 W

BLOCK1:BED11ROOM_EXTFLOOR_0_0_0 PROJECT EXTERNAL FLOOR 0.30 0.084 0.085 14.02 0.00 180.00

BLOCK1:BED11ROOM_ROOF_1_0_0 0.15 0.149 0.153 14.02 180.00 0.00

Page 7 of 16Building CARLOS VEGA ** Worchester Rgnl AP MA USA TMY3 WMO#=725095 20...

2/3/2014file:///F:/Design%20Builder/Final%20Report.htm

Page 45: 2014%NESEA% COMPETITION% - Holyoke Redevelopment · Cities like Holyoke with brutal winter weather can benefit from this trapped solar heat that would ultimately reduce heating costs

BEST PRACTICE FLAT ROOF (NO CEILING)

HEAVYWEIGHT

BLOCK1:HALLROOM_WALL_2_1_0 OUTER WALL 0.22 0.126 0.129 0.53 90.00 90.00 E

BLOCK1:HALLROOM_WALL_6_1_0 OUTER WALL 0.22 0.126 0.129 0.53 180.00 90.00 S

BLOCK1:HALLROOM_WALL_7_1_0 OUTER WALL 0.22 0.126 0.129 0.53 270.00 90.00 W

BLOCK1:HALLROOM_WALL_9_0_0 OUTER WALL 0.22 0.126 0.129 0.53 90.00 90.00 E

BLOCK1:HALLROOM_WALL_13_2_0 OUTER WALL 0.22 0.126 0.129 0.25 0.00 90.00 N

BLOCK1:HALLROOM_WALL_13_2_1 OUTER WALL 0.22 0.126 0.129 0.53 0.00 90.00 N

BLOCK1:HALLROOM_EXTFLOOR_0_0_0 PROJECT EXTERNAL FLOOR 0.30 0.084 0.085 3.04 0.00 180.00

BLOCK1:HALLROOM_EXTFLOOR_0_0_1 PROJECT EXTERNAL FLOOR 0.30 0.084 0.085 1.28 0.00 180.00

BLOCK1:HALLROOM_EXTFLOOR_0_0_2 PROJECT EXTERNAL FLOOR 0.30 0.084 0.085 1.95 0.00 180.00

BLOCK1:HALLROOM_EXTFLOOR_0_0_3 PROJECT EXTERNAL FLOOR 0.30 0.084 0.085 6.85 0.00 180.00

BLOCK1:HALLROOM_ROOF_1_0_0 PROJECT FLAT ROOF 0.15 0.070 0.071 0.23 180.00 0.00

BLOCK1:HALLROOM_ROOF_1_0_1 PROJECT FLAT ROOF 0.15 0.070 0.071 8.70 180.00 0.00

BLOCK1:HALLROOM_ROOF_1_0_2 PROJECT FLAT ROOF 0.15 0.070 0.071 3.59 180.00 0.00

BLOCK1:HALLROOM_ROOF_1_0_3 PROJECT FLAT ROOF 0.15 0.070 0.071 0.60 180.00 0.00

BLOCK1:BED21ROOM_WALL_2_2_0 OUTER WALL 0.22 0.126 0.129 0.25 90.00 90.00 E

BLOCK1:BED21ROOM_WALL_3_0_0 OUTER WALL 0.22 0.126 0.129 6.35 0.00 90.00 N

BLOCK1:BED21ROOM_WALL_4_2_0 OUTER WALL 0.22 0.126 0.129 0.53 270.00 90.00 W

BLOCK1:BED21ROOM_EXTFLOOR_0_0_0 PROJECT EXTERNAL FLOOR 0.30 0.084 0.085 12.31 0.00 180.00

BLOCK1:BED21ROOM_ROOF_1_0_0 PROJECT FLAT ROOF 0.15 0.070 0.071 12.31 180.00 0.00

BLOCK1:TOILET1ROOM_WALL_3_0_0 OUTER WALL 0.22 0.126 0.129 5.08 0.00 90.00 N

BLOCK1:TOILET1ROOM_EXTFLOOR_0_0_0 PROJECT EXTERNAL FLOOR 0.30 0.084 0.085 7.26 0.00 180.00

BLOCK1:TOILET1ROOM_ROOF_1_0_0 PROJECT FLAT ROOF 0.15 0.070 0.071 7.26 180.00 0.00

BLOCK1:BED12ROOM_WALL_3_0_0 OUTER WALL 0.22 0.126 0.129 7.26 0.00 90.00 N

BLOCK1:BED12ROOM_WALL_4_1_0 OUTER WALL 0.22 0.126 0.129 0.28 270.00 90.00 W

BLOCK1:BED12ROOM_WALL_5_1_0 OUTER WALL 0.22 0.126 0.129 0.27 180.00 90.00 S

BLOCK1:BED12ROOM_WALL_6_0_0 OUTER WALL 0.22 0.126 0.129 0.08 90.00 90.00 E

BLOCK1:BED12ROOM_WALL_7_1_0 OUTER WALL 0.22 0.126 0.129 0.27 180.00 90.00 S

BLOCK1:BED12ROOM_EXTFLOOR_0_0_0 PROJECT EXTERNAL FLOOR 0.30 0.084 0.085 6.40 0.00 180.00

BLOCK1:BED12ROOM_EXTFLOOR_0_0_1 PROJECT EXTERNAL FLOOR 0.30 0.084 0.085 4.25 0.00 180.00

BLOCK1:BED12ROOM_ROOF_1_0_1 PROJECT FLAT ROOF 0.15 0.070 0.071 10.61 180.00 0.00

BLOCK1:TOILET2ROOM_WALL_3_0_0 OUTER WALL 0.22 0.126 0.129 5.11 0.00 90.00 N

BLOCK1:TOILET2ROOM_EXTFLOOR_0_0_0 PROJECT EXTERNAL FLOOR 0.30 0.084 0.085 7.32 0.00 180.00

BLOCK1:TOILET2ROOM_ROOF_1_0_0 PROJECT FLAT ROOF 0.15 0.070 0.071 7.32 180.00 0.00

BLOCK1:LAUNDRY1ROOM_WALL_4_0_0 OUTER WALL 0.22 0.126 0.129 4.59 270.00 90.00 W

BLOCK1:LAUNDRY1ROOM_EXTFLOOR_0_0_0 PROJECT EXTERNAL FLOOR 0.30 0.084 0.085 4.32 0.00 180.00

BLOCK1:LAUNDRY1ROOM_ROOF_1_0_0 PROJECT FLAT ROOF 0.15 0.070 0.071 4.32 180.00 0.00

Exterior Fenestration

ConstructionGlass Area [m2]

Frame Area [m2]

Divider Area [m2]

Area of One

Opening [m2]

Area of Multiplied Openings

[m2]

Glass U-

Factor [W/m2

-K]

Glass SHGC

Glass Visible Transmittance

Frame Conductance

[W/m2-K]Con

[W

BLOCK1:BED22ROOM_WALL_3_0_0_0_0_0_WIN 1001 0.95 0.16 0.00 1.11 2.23 1.338 0.282 0.408 9.500

BLOCK1:LIVING2ROOM_WALL_19_0_0_0_0_0_WIN 1001 8.67 0.49 0.00 9.16 9.16 1.338 0.282 0.408 9.500

Page 8 of 16Building CARLOS VEGA ** Worchester Rgnl AP MA USA TMY3 WMO#=725095 20...

2/3/2014file:///F:/Design%20Builder/Final%20Report.htm

Page 46: 2014%NESEA% COMPETITION% - Holyoke Redevelopment · Cities like Holyoke with brutal winter weather can benefit from this trapped solar heat that would ultimately reduce heating costs

Table of Contents

BLOCK1:LIVING2ROOM_WALL_25_0_0_0_0_0_WIN 1001 1.99 0.24 0.00 2.23 2.23 1.338 0.282 0.408 9.500

BLOCK1:LIVING1ROOM_WALL_7_0_0_0_0_0_WIN 1001 8.91 0.50 0.00 9.41 9.41 1.338 0.282 0.408 9.500

BLOCK1:LIVING1ROOM_WALL_22_0_0_0_0_0_WIN 1001 1.99 0.24 0.00 2.23 2.23 1.338 0.282 0.408 9.500

BLOCK1:BED11ROOM_WALL_4_0_0_0_0_0_WIN 1001 0.95 0.16 0.00 1.11 2.23 1.338 0.282 0.408 9.500

BLOCK1:BED21ROOM_WALL_3_0_0_0_0_0_WIN 1001 0.95 0.16 0.00 1.11 2.23 1.338 0.282 0.408 9.500

BLOCK1:TOILET1ROOM_WALL_3_0_0_0_0_0_WIN 1001 0.54 0.15 0.00 0.70 0.70 1.338 0.282 0.408 9.500

BLOCK1:BED12ROOM_WALL_3_0_0_0_0_0_WIN 1002 0.95 0.16 0.00 1.11 1.11 1.761 0.568 0.745 9.500

BLOCK1:BED12ROOM_WALL_3_0_0_1_0_1_WIN 1001 0.95 0.16 0.00 1.11 1.11 1.338 0.282 0.408 9.500

BLOCK1:TOILET2ROOM_WALL_3_0_0_0_0_0_WIN 1001 0.54 0.15 0.00 0.70 0.70 1.338 0.282 0.408 9.500

Total or Average 33.35 1.352 0.292 0.419

North Total or Average 10.31 1.384 0.313 0.444

Non-North Total or Average 23.04 1.338 0.282 0.408

Interior Fenestration

Construction Area of One Opening [m2]

Area of Openings [m2]

Glass U-Factor [W/m2-K]

Glass SHGC

Glass Visible Transmittance

Parent Surface

Total or Average 0.00 - - -

Exterior Door

Construction U-Factor with Film [W/m2-K] U-Factor no Film [W/m2-K] Gross Area [m2] Parent Surface

None

Report: Lighting Summary

For: Entire Facility

Timestamp: 2014-01-31 18:15:54

Interior Lighting

Zone

Lighting Power

Density [W/m2]

Zone Area [m2]

Total Power

[W]End Use Subcategory Schedule

Name

Scheduled Hours/Week

[hr]

H

BLOCK1:BED22ROOM TASK LIGHTING BLOCK1:BED22ROOM 2.0000 13.49 26.98 ELECTRIC

EQUIPMENT#Block1:Bed22Room#TaskLights 3330 26.60

BLOCK1:LAUNDRY2ROOM TASK LIGHTING BLOCK1:LAUNDRY2ROOM 1.5000 2.19 3.29 ELECTRIC

EQUIPMENT#Block1:Laundry2Room#TaskLights 10000 2.99

BLOCK1:LIVING2ROOM GENERAL LIGHTING BLOCK1:LIVING2ROOM 2.4000 43.78 105.08 ELECTRIC

EQUIPMENT#Block1:Living2Room#GeneralLights 3350 49.00

BLOCK1:LIVING1ROOM GENERAL LIGHTING BLOCK1:LIVING1ROOM 3.0000 50.36 151.09 ELECTRIC

EQUIPMENT#Block1:Living1Room#GeneralLights 3350 49.00

BLOCK1:BED11ROOM TASK LIGHTING BLOCK1:BED11ROOM 2.0000 14.02 28.04 ELECTRIC

EQUIPMENT#Block1:Bed11Room#TaskLights 3330 26.60

BLOCK1:HALLROOM GENERAL LIGHTING BLOCK1:HALLROOM 2.0000 13.12 26.23 ELECTRIC

EQUIPMENT#Block1:HallRoom#GeneralLights 3360 73.99

BLOCK1:BED21ROOM TASK LIGHTING BLOCK1:BED21ROOM 2.0000 12.31 24.61 ELECTRIC

EQUIPMENT#Block1:Bed21Room#TaskLights 3330 26.60

BLOCK1:TOILET1ROOM TASK LIGHTING BLOCK1:TOILET1ROOM 3.0000 7.26 21.77 ELECTRIC

EQUIPMENT#Block1:Toilet1Room#TaskLights 3325 56.00

BLOCK1:BED12ROOM TASK LIGHTING BLOCK1:BED12ROOM 2.0000 10.65 21.31 ELECTRIC

EQUIPMENT#Block1:Bed12Room#TaskLights 3330 26.60

BLOCK1:TOILET2ROOM TASK LIGHTING BLOCK1:TOILET2ROOM 3.0000 7.32 21.97 ELECTRIC

EQUIPMENT#Block1:Toilet2Room#TaskLights 3325 56.00

BLOCK1:LAUNDRY1ROOM TASK LIGHTING BLOCK1:LAUNDRY1ROOM 1.5000 4.32 6.48 ELECTRIC

EQUIPMENT#Block1:Laundry1Room#TaskLights 10000 2.99

Interior Lighting Total 2.4429 178.82 436.84

Page 9 of 16Building CARLOS VEGA ** Worchester Rgnl AP MA USA TMY3 WMO#=725095 20...

2/3/2014file:///F:/Design%20Builder/Final%20Report.htm

Page 47: 2014%NESEA% COMPETITION% - Holyoke Redevelopment · Cities like Holyoke with brutal winter weather can benefit from this trapped solar heat that would ultimately reduce heating costs

Table of Contents

Daylighting

Zone Daylighting Type Control Type Fraction Controlled Lighting Installed in Zone [W] Lighting Controlled [W]

None

Exterior Lighting

Total Watts

Astronomical Clock/Schedule

Schedule Name

Scheduled Hours/Week [hr]

Hours/Week > 1% [hr]

Full Load Hours/Week [hr]

Consumption [GJ]

Exterior Lighting Total 0.00 0.00

Report: Equipment Summary

For: Entire Facility

Timestamp: 2014-01-31 18:15:54

Central Plant

Type Nominal Capacity [W] Nominal Efficiency [W/W] IPLV in SI Units [W/W] IPLV in IP Units [Btu/W-h]

None

Cooling Coils

Type Nominal Total Capacity [W]

Nominal Sensible Capacity [W]

Nominal Latent Capacity [W]

Nominal Sensible Heat Ratio

Nominal Efficiency [W/W]

Nominal Coil UA Value [W/C]

Nominal Coil Surface Area [m2]

None

DX Cooling Coils

DX Cooling Coil Type Standard Rated Net Cooling Capacity [W] Standard Rated Net COP [W/W] EER [Btu/W-h] SEER [Btu/W-h] IEER [Btu/W-h]

None

DX Heating Coils

DX Heating Coil Type

High Temperature Heating (net) Rating Capacity [W]

Low Temperature Heating (net) Rating Capacity [W]

HSPF [Btu/W-h]

Region Number

None

Heating Coils

Type Nominal Total Capacity [W] Nominal Efficiency [W/W]

None

Fans

Type Total Efficiency [W/W]

Delta Pressure [pa]

Max Air Flow Rate [m3/s]

Rated Electric Power [W]

Rated Power Per Max Air Flow Rate [W-s/m3]

Motor Heat In Air Fraction

End Use

None

Pumps

Type Control Head [pa] Water Flow [m3/s] Electric Power [W] Power Per Water Flow Rate [W-s/m3] Motor Efficiency [W/W]

None

Service Water Heating

Type Storage Volume [m3] Input [W] Thermal Efficiency [W/W] Recovery Efficiency [W/W] Energy Factor

None

Page 10 of 16Building CARLOS VEGA ** Worchester Rgnl AP MA USA TMY3 WMO#=725095 ...

2/3/2014file:///F:/Design%20Builder/Final%20Report.htm

Page 48: 2014%NESEA% COMPETITION% - Holyoke Redevelopment · Cities like Holyoke with brutal winter weather can benefit from this trapped solar heat that would ultimately reduce heating costs

Table of ContentsReport: HVAC Sizing Summary

For: Entire Facility

Timestamp: 2014-01-31 18:15:54

Zone Cooling

Calculated Design Load

[W]

User Design

Load [W]

Calculated Design Air

Flow [m3/s]

User Design Air Flow

[m3/s]Design Day Name Date/Time

Of PeakTemperature at

Peak [C]Humidity Ratio at

Peak [kgWater/kgAir]

BLOCK1:BED22ROOM 294.21 338.34 0.019 0.037SUMMER

DESIGN DAY IN CARLOS VEGA

7/15 20:30:00 24.59 0.01400

BLOCK1:LAUNDRY2ROOM 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.006SUMMER

DESIGN DAY IN CARLOS VEGA

29.50 0.01400

BLOCK1:LIVING2ROOM 1859.89 2138.87 0.113 0.130SUMMER

DESIGN DAY IN CARLOS VEGA

7/15 14:00:00 29.50 0.01400

BLOCK1:LIVING1ROOM 1976.26 2272.70 0.120 0.138SUMMER

DESIGN DAY IN CARLOS VEGA

7/15 14:00:00 29.50 0.01400

BLOCK1:BED11ROOM 296.63 341.12 0.019 0.038SUMMER

DESIGN DAY IN CARLOS VEGA

7/15 20:30:00 24.59 0.01400

BLOCK1:HALLROOM 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.018SUMMER

DESIGN DAY IN CARLOS VEGA

29.50 0.01400

BLOCK1:BED21ROOM 246.12 283.04 0.016 0.033SUMMER

DESIGN DAY IN CARLOS VEGA

7/15 20:30:00 24.59 0.01400

BLOCK1:TOILET1ROOM 191.38 220.09 0.012 0.015SUMMER

DESIGN DAY IN CARLOS VEGA

7/15 17:30:00 27.79 0.01400

BLOCK1:BED12ROOM 236.11 271.52 0.015 0.029SUMMER

DESIGN DAY IN CARLOS VEGA

7/15 20:30:00 24.59 0.01400

BLOCK1:TOILET2ROOM 182.70 210.10 0.012 0.030SUMMER

DESIGN DAY IN CARLOS VEGA

7/15 17:30:00 27.79 0.01400

BLOCK1:LAUNDRY1ROOM 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.012SUMMER

DESIGN DAY IN CARLOS VEGA

29.50 0.01400

Zone Heating

Calculated Design Load

[W]

User Design

Load [W]

Calculated Design Air

Flow [m3/s]

User Design Air Flow

[m3/s]Design Day Name Date/Time

Of PeakTemperature at

Peak [C]Humidity Ratio at

Peak [kgWater/kgAir]

BLOCK1:BED22ROOM 739.15 923.94 0.037 0.047WINTER

DESIGN DAY IN CARLOS VEGA

1/15 21:00:00 -17.00 0.00087

BLOCK1:LAUNDRY2ROOM 85.05 106.32 0.004 0.006WINTER

DESIGN DAY IN CARLOS VEGA

1/15 06:00:00 -17.00 0.00087

BLOCK1:LIVING2ROOM 2543.84 3179.81 0.128 0.161WINTER

DESIGN DAY IN CARLOS VEGA

1/15 15:00:00 -17.00 0.00087

BLOCK1:LIVING1ROOM 2683.06 3353.83 0.135 0.169WINTER

DESIGN DAY IN CARLOS VEGA

1/15 15:00:00 -17.00 0.00087

BLOCK1:BED11ROOM 768.42 960.52 0.039 0.048WINTER

DESIGN DAY IN CARLOS VEGA

1/15 21:00:00 -17.00 0.00087

BLOCK1:HALLROOM 369.86 462.33 0.015 0.019WINTER

DESIGN DAY IN CARLOS VEGA

1/15 16:00:00 -17.00 0.00087

Page 11 of 16Building CARLOS VEGA ** Worchester Rgnl AP MA USA TMY3 WMO#=725095 ...

2/3/2014file:///F:/Design%20Builder/Final%20Report.htm

Page 49: 2014%NESEA% COMPETITION% - Holyoke Redevelopment · Cities like Holyoke with brutal winter weather can benefit from this trapped solar heat that would ultimately reduce heating costs

Table of Contents

BLOCK1:BED21ROOM 656.03 820.04 0.033 0.041 WINTER DESIGN DAY IN CARLOS VEGA

1/15 21:00:00

-17.00 0.00087

BLOCK1:TOILET1ROOM 340.29 425.36 0.015 0.019WINTER

DESIGN DAY IN CARLOS VEGA

1/15 18:00:00 -17.00 0.00087

BLOCK1:BED12ROOM 618.43 773.04 0.031 0.039WINTER

DESIGN DAY IN CARLOS VEGA

1/15 21:00:00 -17.00 0.00087

BLOCK1:TOILET2ROOM 260.89 326.11 0.012 0.030WINTER

DESIGN DAY IN CARLOS VEGA

1/15 18:30:00 -17.00 0.00087

BLOCK1:LAUNDRY1ROOM 146.14 182.68 0.006 0.012WINTER

DESIGN DAY IN CARLOS VEGA

1/15 06:00:00 -17.00 0.00087

System Design Air Flow Rates

Calculated cooling [m3/s] User cooling [m3/s] Calculated heating [m3/s] User heating [m3/s]

None

Report: System Summary

For: Entire Facility

Timestamp: 2014-01-31 18:15:54

Economizer

High Limit Shutoff Control

Minimum Outdoor Air [m3/s]

Maximum Outdoor Air [m3/s]

Return Air Temp Limit

Return Air Enthalpy Limit

Outdoor Air Temperature Limit [C]

Outdoor Air Enthalpy Limit [C]

None

Demand Controlled Ventilation using Controller:MechanicalVentilation

Controller:MechanicalVentilation Name

Outdoor Air Per Person [m3/s-

person]

Outdoor Air Per Area [m3/s-m2]

Air Distribution Effectiveness in Cooling

Mode

Air Distribution Effectiveness in Heating

Mode

Air Distribution Effectiveness Schedule

None

Time Not Comfortable Based on Simple ASHRAE 55-2004

Winter Clothes [hr] Summer Clothes [hr] Summer or Winter Clothes [hr]

BLOCK1:BED22ROOM 3409.00 3986.00 3387.50

BLOCK1:LAUNDRY2ROOM 4013.00 4375.50 4010.50

BLOCK1:LIVING2ROOM 1963.50 2042.50 1513.50

BLOCK1:LIVING1ROOM 1972.00 1999.50 1488.00

BLOCK1:BED11ROOM 3344.50 3984.00 3321.00

BLOCK1:HALLROOM 3125.00 3742.50 3053.50

BLOCK1:BED21ROOM 3420.00 3989.50 3400.00

BLOCK1:TOILET1ROOM 2095.50 2496.50 2066.50

BLOCK1:BED12ROOM 3401.00 3991.50 3385.00

BLOCK1:TOILET2ROOM 2162.00 2521.50 2140.50

BLOCK1:LAUNDRY1ROOM 3960.50 4375.00 3957.00

Facility 8087.00 8740.00 7941.50Aggregated over the RunPeriods for Weather

Time Setpoint Not Met

During Heating [hr] During Cooling [hr] During Occupied Heating [hr] During Occupied Cooling [hr]

BLOCK1:BED22ROOM 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

BLOCK1:LAUNDRY2ROOM 7.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Page 12 of 16Building CARLOS VEGA ** Worchester Rgnl AP MA USA TMY3 WMO#=725095 ...

2/3/2014file:///F:/Design%20Builder/Final%20Report.htm

Page 50: 2014%NESEA% COMPETITION% - Holyoke Redevelopment · Cities like Holyoke with brutal winter weather can benefit from this trapped solar heat that would ultimately reduce heating costs

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

BLOCK1:LIVING2ROOM 0.00 3.00 0.00 0.00

BLOCK1:LIVING1ROOM 0.00 3.00 0.00 0.00

BLOCK1:BED11ROOM 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

BLOCK1:HALLROOM 62.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

BLOCK1:BED21ROOM 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

BLOCK1:TOILET1ROOM 0.00 1.50 0.00 0.00

BLOCK1:BED12ROOM 0.00 1.50 0.00 0.00

BLOCK1:TOILET2ROOM 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

BLOCK1:LAUNDRY1ROOM 6.50 0.00 0.00 0.00

Facility 65.00 6.00 0.00 0.00Aggregated over the RunPeriods for Weather

Report: Outdoor Air Summary

For: Entire Facility

Timestamp: 2014-01-31 18:15:54

Average Outdoor Air During Occupied Hours

Average Number of Occupants

Nominal Number of Occupants

Zone Volume [m3]

Mechanical Ventilation [ach]

Infiltration [ach]

Simple Ventilation [ach]

BLOCK1:BED22ROOM 0.25 0.31 32.89 3.200 0.315 0.014

BLOCK1:LAUNDRY2ROOM 0.14 0.19 5.35 0.250 0.311 0.000

BLOCK1:LIVING2ROOM 0.67 0.82 106.76 0.144 0.314 0.003

BLOCK1:LIVING1ROOM 0.77 0.94 122.80 0.144 0.314 0.003

BLOCK1:BED11ROOM 0.26 0.32 34.18 3.200 0.315 0.015

BLOCK1:HALLROOM 0.20 0.26 31.98 0.237 0.311 0.000

BLOCK1:BED21ROOM 0.22 0.28 30.00 3.200 0.315 0.014

BLOCK1:TOILET1ROOM 0.07 0.14 17.70 2.059 0.313 0.000

BLOCK1:BED12ROOM 0.19 0.24 25.98 3.215 0.315 0.015

BLOCK1:TOILET2ROOM 0.07 0.14 17.86 3.906 0.312 0.000

BLOCK1:LAUNDRY1ROOM 0.28 0.37 10.53 0.250 0.312 0.000Values shown for a single zone without multipliers

Minimum Outdoor Air During Occupied Hours

Average Number of Occupants

Nominal Number of Occupants

Zone Volume [m3]

Mechanical Ventilation [ach]

Infiltration [ach]

Simple Ventilation [ach]

BLOCK1:BED22ROOM 0.25 0.31 32.89 0.973 0.007 0.000

BLOCK1:LAUNDRY2ROOM 0.14 0.19 5.35 0.000 0.008 0.000

BLOCK1:LIVING2ROOM 0.67 0.82 106.76 0.000 0.013 0.000

BLOCK1:LIVING1ROOM 0.77 0.94 122.80 0.000 0.013 0.000

BLOCK1:BED11ROOM 0.26 0.32 34.18 0.973 0.007 0.000

BLOCK1:HALLROOM 0.20 0.26 31.98 0.000 0.012 0.000

BLOCK1:BED21ROOM 0.22 0.28 30.00 0.973 0.007 0.000

BLOCK1:TOILET1ROOM 0.07 0.14 17.70 0.000 0.008 0.000

BLOCK1:BED12ROOM 0.19 0.24 25.98 0.973 0.007 0.000

BLOCK1:TOILET2ROOM 0.07 0.14 17.86 0.000 0.008 0.000

BLOCK1:LAUNDRY1ROOM 0.28 0.37 10.53 0.000 0.008 0.000Values shown for a single zone without multipliers

Report: Object Count Summary

For: Entire Facility

Timestamp: 2014-01-31 18:15:54

Surfaces by Class

Total Outdoors

Page 13 of 16Building CARLOS VEGA ** Worchester Rgnl AP MA USA TMY3 WMO#=725095 ...

2/3/2014file:///F:/Design%20Builder/Final%20Report.htm

Page 51: 2014%NESEA% COMPETITION% - Holyoke Redevelopment · Cities like Holyoke with brutal winter weather can benefit from this trapped solar heat that would ultimately reduce heating costs

Table of Contents

Wall 142 62

Floor 31 31

Roof 30 30

Internal Mass 0 0

Building Detached Shading 0 0

Fixed Detached Shading 0 0

Window 11 11

Door 26 0

Glass Door 0 0

Shading 0 0

Overhang 0 0

Fin 0 0

Tubular Daylighting Device Dome 0 0

Tubular Daylighting Device Diffuser 0 0

HVAC

Count

HVAC Air Loops 0

Conditioned Zones 11

Unconditioned Zones 0

Supply Plenums 0

Return Plenums 0

Input Fields

Count

IDF Objects 1086

Defaulted Fields 134

Fields with Defaults 2991

Autosized Fields 31

Autosizable Fields 44

Autocalculated Fields 22

Autocalculatable Fields 524

Report: Sensible Heat Gain Summary

For: Entire Facility

Timestamp: 2014-01-31 18:15:54

Annual Building Sensible Heat Gain Components

HVAC Input

Sensible Air

Heating [GJ]

HVAC Input

Sensible Air

Cooling [GJ]

HVAC Input

Heated Surface Heating

[GJ]

HVAC Input

Cooled Surface Cooling

[GJ]

People Sensible

Heat Addition

[GJ]

Lights Sensible

Heat Addition

[GJ]

Equipment Sensible

Heat Addition

[GJ]

Window Heat

Addition [GJ]

Interzone Air

Transfer Heat

Addition [GJ]

Infiltration Heat

Addition [GJ]

Opaque Surface

Conduction and Other

Heat Addition

[GJ]

Equipment Sensible

Heat Removal

[GJ]

WindowHea

Remova[GJ

BLOCK1:BED22ROOM 2.557 -0.502 0.000 0.000 0.283 0.135 0.000 0.485 0.000 0.014 0.000 0.000 -0.67

BLOCK1:LAUNDRY2ROOM 0.103 -0.525 0.000 0.000 0.208 0.002 0.514 0.000 0.000 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.00

BLOCK1:LIVING2ROOM 3.899 -4.446 0.000 0.000 0.474 0.966 1.106 9.258 0.000 0.026 0.000 0.000 -3.06

BLOCK1:LIVING1ROOM 4.050 -4.893 0.000 0.000 0.543 1.390 1.273 9.471 0.000 0.030 0.000 0.000 -3.13

BLOCK1:BED11ROOM 2.839 -0.559 0.000 0.000 0.294 0.140 0.000 0.485 0.000 0.015 0.000 0.000 -0.67

BLOCK1:HALLROOM 0.578 -1.903 0.000 0.000 0.278 0.364 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.016 1.711 0.000 0.00

BLOCK1:BED21ROOM 2.363 -0.454 0.000 0.000 0.259 0.123 0.000 0.485 0.000 0.014 0.000 0.000 -0.67

BLOCK1:TOILET1ROOM 0.540 -0.228 0.000 0.000 0.060 0.229 0.000 0.136 0.000 0.008 0.090 0.000 -0.21

Page 14 of 16Building CARLOS VEGA ** Worchester Rgnl AP MA USA TMY3 WMO#=725095 ...

2/3/2014file:///F:/Design%20Builder/Final%20Report.htm

Page 52: 2014%NESEA% COMPETITION% - Holyoke Redevelopment · Cities like Holyoke with brutal winter weather can benefit from this trapped solar heat that would ultimately reduce heating costs

BLOCK1:BED12ROOM 2.135 -0.410 0.000 0.000 0.224 0.106 0.000 0.735 0.000 0.009 0.000 0.000 -0.76

BLOCK1:TOILET2ROOM 0.571 -0.300 0.000 0.000 0.061 0.231 0.000 0.138 0.000 0.009 0.127 0.000 -0.21

BLOCK1:LAUNDRY1ROOM 0.162 -0.909 0.000 0.000 0.399 0.004 1.012 0.000 0.000 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.00

Total Facility 19.800 -15.128 0.000 0.000 3.084 3.690 3.905 21.192 0.000 0.144 1.929 0.000 -9.40

Peak Cooling Sensible Heat Gain Components

Time of

Peak

HVAC Input

Sensible Air

Heating [W]

HVAC Input

Sensible Air

Cooling [W]

HVAC Input

Heated Surface Heating

[W]

HVAC Input

Cooled Surface Cooling

[W]

People Sensible

Heat Addition

[W]

Lights Sensible

Heat Addition

[W]

Equipment Sensible

Heat Addition

[W]

Window Heat

Addition [W]

Interzone Air

Transfer Heat

Addition [W]

Infiltration Heat

Addition [W]

Opaque Surface

Conduction and Other

Heat Addition

[W]

Equipment Sensible

Heat Removal

[W]

W

R

BLOCK1:BED22ROOM23-

JUL-19:04

0.00 -585.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.15 583.85 0.00

BLOCK1:LAUNDRY2ROOM18-

JAN-23:03

0.00 -159.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 176.48 0.00

BLOCK1:LIVING2ROOM22-

JAN-23:03

0.00 -4019.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 5092.25 0.00

BLOCK1:LIVING1ROOM22-

JAN-23:03

0.00 -4622.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 5778.48 0.00

BLOCK1:BED11ROOM23-

JUL-19:04

0.00 -590.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.61 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.68 587.71 0.00

BLOCK1:HALLROOM23-

JAN-00:01

0.00 -793.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 931.10 0.00

BLOCK1:BED21ROOM

28-APR

-23:30

0.00 -503.88 0.00 0.00 22.86 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 558.14 0.00

BLOCK1:TOILET1ROOM25-

JUL-16:11

0.00 -287.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 17.74 0.00 8.50 261.01 0.00

BLOCK1:BED12ROOM24-

JUL-19:04

0.00 -559.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.40 556.01 0.00

BLOCK1:TOILET2ROOM25-

JUL-16:04

0.00 -406.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 17.88 0.00 8.36 379.97 0.00

BLOCK1:LAUNDRY1ROOM17-

JAN-23:03

0.00 -286.91 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 315.89 0.00

Total Facility22-

JAN-23:03

0.00 -6842.13 0.00 0.00 77.86 26.23 16.51 0.00 0.00 0.00 10499.65 0.00 -

Peak Heating Sensible Heat Gain Components

Time of

Peak

HVAC Input

Sensible Air

Heating [W]

HVAC Input

Sensible Air

Cooling [W]

HVAC Input

Heated Surface Heating

[W]

HVAC Input

Cooled Surface Cooling

[W]

People Sensible

Heat Addition

[W]

Lights Sensible

Heat Addition

[W]

Equipment Sensible

Heat Addition

[W]

Window Heat

Addition [W]

Interzone Air

Transfer Heat

Addition [W]

Infiltration Heat

Addition [W]

Opaque Surface

Conduction and Other

Heat Addition

[W]

Equipment Sensible

Heat Removal

[W]

BLOCK1:BED22ROOM18-

JAN-20:03

1910.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

BLOCK1:LAUNDRY2ROOM

08-DEC

-05:03

267.77 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

BLOCK1:LIVING2ROOM 6100.95 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Page 15 of 16Building CARLOS VEGA ** Worchester Rgnl AP MA USA TMY3 WMO#=725095 ...

2/3/2014file:///F:/Design%20Builder/Final%20Report.htm

Page 53: 2014%NESEA% COMPETITION% - Holyoke Redevelopment · Cities like Holyoke with brutal winter weather can benefit from this trapped solar heat that would ultimately reduce heating costs

Table of Contents

11-JAN-14:03

BLOCK1:LIVING1ROOM11-

JAN-14:03

6896.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

BLOCK1:BED11ROOM23-

JAN-20:03

2004.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.61 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

BLOCK1:HALLROOM11-

JAN-15:03

1005.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

BLOCK1:BED21ROOM23-

JAN-20:03

1728.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

BLOCK1:TOILET1ROOM

18-DEC

-05:02

899.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

BLOCK1:BED12ROOM18-

JAN-20:03

1541.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

BLOCK1:TOILET2ROOM

12-DEC

-05:02

860.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

BLOCK1:LAUNDRY1ROOM

19-NOV

-05:03

531.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Total Facility11-

JAN-14:03

13633.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 62.31 0.00 141.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Report: Component Sizing Summary

For: Entire Facility

Timestamp: 2014-01-31 18:15:54

ZoneHVAC:IdealLoadsAirSystem

Maximum Cooling Air Flow Rate [m3/s]

Maximum Sensible Heating Capacity [W]

Maximum Total Cooling Capacity [W]

BLOCK1:BED22ROOM IDEAL LOADS AIR 0.036546 2476.74 1227.00

BLOCK1:LAUNDRY2ROOM IDEAL LOADS AIR 0.005944 371.37 0.000000

BLOCK1:LIVING2ROOM IDEAL LOADS AIR 0.130398 8217.04 4899.15

BLOCK1:LIVING1ROOM IDEAL LOADS AIR 0.137514 9151.08 5403.08

BLOCK1:BED11ROOM IDEAL LOADS AIR 0.037983 2574.26 1275.25

BLOCK1:HALLROOM IDEAL LOADS AIR 0.017767 1138.59 0.000000

BLOCK1:BED21ROOM IDEAL LOADS AIR 0.033339 2236.93 1119.32

BLOCK1:TOILET1ROOM IDEAL LOADS AIR 1010.32 551.63

BLOCK1:BED12ROOM IDEAL LOADS AIR 1998.94 969.07

BLOCK1:TOILET2ROOM IDEAL LOADS AIR 0.029767 1859.63 1113.33

BLOCK1:LAUNDRY1ROOM IDEAL LOADS AIR 0.011701 730.99 0.000000

Page 16 of 16Building CARLOS VEGA ** Worchester Rgnl AP MA USA TMY3 WMO#=725095 ...

2/3/2014file:///F:/Design%20Builder/Final%20Report.htm

Page 54: 2014%NESEA% COMPETITION% - Holyoke Redevelopment · Cities like Holyoke with brutal winter weather can benefit from this trapped solar heat that would ultimately reduce heating costs

WPI ZERA Cost Evaluation

NESEA 2014

Gregory Freeman, Civil EngineeringYunjae Sohn, Architectural Engineering

Page 55: 2014%NESEA% COMPETITION% - Holyoke Redevelopment · Cities like Holyoke with brutal winter weather can benefit from this trapped solar heat that would ultimately reduce heating costs

Door ScheduleFamily Type Cost

Single-Flush 30" x 80" $60.00Single-Flush 30" x 80" $60.00Single-Flush 30" x 80" $60.00Single-Flush 30" x 80" $60.00Single-Flush 30" x 80" $60.00Single-Flush 30" x 80" $60.00Single-Flush 30" x 80" $60.00Single-Flush 30" x 80" $60.00Single-Flush 30" x 80" $60.00Single-Flush 30" x 80" $60.00Single-Flush 30" x 80" $60.00Single-Flush 30" x 80" $60.00Single-Flush 30" x 80" $60.00Single-Flush 30" x 80" $60.00Bifold-2 Panel 30" x 80" $55.00Bifold-2 Panel 30" x 80" $55.00Bifold-2 Panel 30" x 80" $55.00Bifold-2 Panel 30" x 80" $55.00Bifold-2 Panel 30" x 80" $55.00Bifold-2 Panel 30" x 80" $55.00Single-Flush 30" x 84" $60.00Single-Flush 30" x 84" $60.00Single-Flush 30" x 84" $60.00Single-Flush 30" x 84" $60.00Single-Flush 30" x 84" $60.00Single-Flush 30" x 84" $60.00Single-Flush 30" x 84" $60.00Single-Flush 30" x 84" $60.00Single-Flush 30" x 84" $60.00Single-Flush 30" x 84" $60.00Single-Flush 30" x 84" $60.00Single-Flush 30" x 84" $60.00Single-Flush 30" x 84" $60.00Single-Flush 30" x 84" $60.00Single-Flush 30" x 84" $60.00Single-Flush 30" x 84" $60.00Single-Flush 30" x 84" $60.00Single-Flush 30" x 84" $60.00Single-Flush 30" x 84" $60.00Single-Flush 30" x 84" $60.00Single-Flush 30" x 84" $60.00Single-Flush 30" x 84" $60.00Single-Flush 30" x 84" $60.00Single-Flush 30" x 84" $60.00

Page 56: 2014%NESEA% COMPETITION% - Holyoke Redevelopment · Cities like Holyoke with brutal winter weather can benefit from this trapped solar heat that would ultimately reduce heating costs

Single-Flush 30" x 84" $60.00Single-Flush 30" x 84" $60.00Single-Flush 30" x 84" $60.00Single-Flush 30" x 84" $60.00Single-Flush 30" x 84" $60.00Single-Flush 30" x 84" $60.00Single-Flush 30" x 84" $60.00Single-Decorative 2 30" x 84" $300.00Single-Decorative 2 36" x 84" $300.00Bifold-4 Panel 48" x 84" $100.00Bifold-4 Panel 48" x 84" $100.00Bifold-4 Panel 48" x 84" $100.00Bifold-4 Panel 48" x 84" $100.00Bifold-4 Panel 48" x 84" $100.00Bifold-4 Panel 48" x 84" $100.00Bifold-4 Panel 48" x 84" $100.00Bifold-4 Panel 48" x 84" $100.00Bifold-4 Panel 48" x 84" $100.00Bifold-4 Panel 48" x 84" $100.00Bifold-4 Panel 48" x 84" $100.00Grand total: 64 $4,730.00

Page 57: 2014%NESEA% COMPETITION% - Holyoke Redevelopment · Cities like Holyoke with brutal winter weather can benefit from this trapped solar heat that would ultimately reduce heating costs

Window ScheduleFamily Type Cost

Double Hung 36" x 48" $300.00Double Hung 36" x 48" $300.00Double Hung 36" x 48" $300.00Double Hung 36" x 48" $300.00Double Hung 36" x 48" $300.00Double Hung 36" x 48" $300.00Double Hung 36" x 48" $300.00Double Hung 36" x 48" $300.00Double Hung 36" x 48" $300.00Double Hung 36" x 48" $300.00Double Hung 36" x 48" $300.00Double Hung 36" x 48" $300.00Double Hung 36" x 48" $300.00Double Hung 36" x 48" $300.00Double Hung 36" x 48" $300.00Double Hung 36" x 48" $300.00Double Hung 36" x 48" $300.00Double Hung 36" x 48" $300.00Double Hung 36" x 48" $300.00Double Hung 36" x 48" $300.00Double Hung 36" x 48" $300.00Double Hung 36" x 48" $300.00Double Hung 36" x 48" $300.00Double Hung 36" x 48" $300.00Double Hung 36" x 48" $300.00Double Hung 36" x 48" $300.00Double Hung 36" x 48" $300.00Double Hung 36" x 48" $300.00Double Hung 36" x 48" $300.00Double Hung 36" x 48" $300.00Fixed 72" x 48" $600.00Fixed 72" x 48" $600.00Fixed 72" x 48" $600.00Fixed 72" x 48" $600.00Fixed 72" x 48" $600.00Fixed 72" x 48" $600.00Fixed 72" x 48" $600.00Fixed 72" x 48" $600.00Transom with Trim 60" x 18" $200.00Transom with Trim 60" x 18" $200.00Transom with Trim 60" x 18" $200.00Transom with Trim 60" x 18" $200.00Transom with Trim 60" x 18" $200.00Transom with Trim 60" x 18" $200.00

Page 58: 2014%NESEA% COMPETITION% - Holyoke Redevelopment · Cities like Holyoke with brutal winter weather can benefit from this trapped solar heat that would ultimately reduce heating costs

Transom with Trim 60" x 18" $200.00Transom with Trim 60" x 18" $200.00Grand total $15,400.00

Page 59: 2014%NESEA% COMPETITION% - Holyoke Redevelopment · Cities like Holyoke with brutal winter weather can benefit from this trapped solar heat that would ultimately reduce heating costs

Wall Material TakeoffMaterial: Name Material: AMaterial: Ctotal cost Type

Concrete, Lightweight 445 SF 0.29 $128.95 13"Concrete, Lightweight 499 SF 0.29 $144.61 13"Concrete, Lightweight 436 SF 0.29 $126.44 13"Concrete, Lightweight 490 SF 0.29 $142.10 13"Concrete, Lightweight 80 SF 0.29 $23.08 13"Concrete, Lightweight 109 SF 0.29 $31.61 13"Concrete, Lightweight 77 SF 0.29 $22.45 13"Concrete, Lightweight 107 SF 0.29 $30.98 13"Air 25 SF 0 $0.00 Brick facade wallAir 25 SF 0 $0.00 Brick facade wallAir 258 SF 0 $0.00 Brick facade wallAir 26 SF 0 $0.00 Brick facade wallAir 1204 SF 0 $0.00 Brick facade wallAir 276 SF 0 $0.00 Brick facade wallAir Infiltration Barrier 25 SF 0.1 $2.50 Brick facade wallAir Infiltration Barrier 25 SF 0.1 $2.50 Brick facade wallAir Infiltration Barrier 263 SF 0.1 $26.33 Brick facade wallAir Infiltration Barrier 27 SF 0.1 $2.67 Brick facade wallAir Infiltration Barrier 1253 SF 0.1 $125.32 Brick facade wallAir Infiltration Barrier 282 SF 0.1 $28.16 Brick facade wallBrick, Common 25 SF 11 $275.04 Brick facade wallBrick, Common 25 SF 11 $275.04 Brick facade wallBrick, Common 257 SF 11 $2,821.76 Brick facade wallBrick, Common 25 SF 11 $278.29 Brick facade wallBrick, Common 1191 SF 11 $13,095.61 Brick facade wallBrick, Common 274 SF 11 $3,018.59 Brick facade wallGypsum Wall Board 25 SF 0.5 $12.50 Brick facade wallGypsum Wall Board 25 SF 0.5 $12.50 Brick facade wallGypsum Wall Board 263 SF 0.5 $131.66 Brick facade wallGypsum Wall Board 27 SF 0.5 $13.35 Brick facade wallGypsum Wall Board 1253 SF 0.5 $626.62 Brick facade wallGypsum Wall Board 282 SF 0.5 $140.79 Brick facade wallPolyisocyanurate Insulation Boards 25 SF 1.9 $47.51 Brick facade wallPolyisocyanurate Insulation Boards 25 SF 1.9 $47.51 Brick facade wallPolyisocyanurate Insulation Boards 260 SF 1.9 $494.19 Brick facade wallPolyisocyanurate Insulation Boards 26 SF 1.9 $49.47 Brick facade wallPolyisocyanurate Insulation Boards 1224 SF 1.9 $2,324.70 Brick facade wallPolyisocyanurate Insulation Boards 278 SF 1.9 $528.56 Brick facade wallCellulose Insulation 25 SF 0 $0.00 Brick facade wallCellulose Insulation 25 SF 0 $0.00 Brick facade wallCellulose Insulation 263 SF 0 $0.00 Brick facade wallCellulose Insulation 27 SF 0 $0.00 Brick facade wallCellulose Insulation 1250 SF 0 $0.00 Brick facade wallCellulose Insulation 281 SF 0 $0.00 Brick facade wall

Page 60: 2014%NESEA% COMPETITION% - Holyoke Redevelopment · Cities like Holyoke with brutal winter weather can benefit from this trapped solar heat that would ultimately reduce heating costs

Vapor Retarder 25 SF 0.12 $3.00 Brick facade wallVapor Retarder 25 SF 0.12 $3.00 Brick facade wallVapor Retarder 263 SF 0.12 $31.60 Brick facade wallVapor Retarder 27 SF 0.12 $3.20 Brick facade wallVapor Retarder 1253 SF 0.12 $150.39 Brick facade wallVapor Retarder 282 SF 0.12 $33.79 Brick facade wallAir Infiltration Barrier 1416 SF 0.1 $141.63 CMU BRICK FACADEAir Infiltration Barrier 1416 SF 0.1 $141.63 CMU BRICK FACADEBrick, Common 1416 SF 11 $15,579.21 CMU BRICK FACADEBrick, Common 1416 SF 11 $15,579.21 CMU BRICK FACADEConcrete Masonry Units 1416 SF 15.2 $21,527.63 CMU BRICK FACADEConcrete Masonry Units 1416 SF 15.2 $21,527.63 CMU BRICK FACADEGypsum Wall Board 1416 SF 0.5 $708.15 CMU BRICK FACADEGypsum Wall Board 1416 SF 0.5 $708.15 CMU BRICK FACADEPolyisocyanurate Insulation Boards 1416 SF 1.9 $2,690.95 CMU BRICK FACADEPolyisocyanurate Insulation Boards 1416 SF 1.9 $2,690.95 CMU BRICK FACADEVapor Retarder 1416 SF 0.12 $169.95 CMU BRICK FACADEVapor Retarder 1416 SF 0.12 $169.95 CMU BRICK FACADEAir Infiltration Barrier 348 SF 0.1 $34.84 CMU Stone facadeAir Infiltration Barrier 348 SF 0.1 $34.84 CMU Stone facadeConcrete Masonry Units 348 SF 15.2 $5,296.23 CMU Stone facadeConcrete Masonry Units 348 SF 15.2 $5,296.23 CMU Stone facadeGypsum Wall Board 348 SF 0.5 $174.22 CMU Stone facadeGypsum Wall Board 348 SF 0.5 $174.22 CMU Stone facadePolyisocyanurate Insulation Boards 348 SF 1.9 $662.03 CMU Stone facadePolyisocyanurate Insulation Boards 348 SF 1.9 $662.03 CMU Stone facadestone finish 348 SF 15 $5,226.54 CMU Stone facadestone finish 348 SF 15 $5,226.54 CMU Stone facadeVapor Retarder 348 SF 0.12 $41.81 CMU Stone facadeVapor Retarder 348 SF 0.12 $41.81 CMU Stone facadeGypsum Wall Board 186 SF 0.5 $93.21 Interior WallsGypsum Wall Board 130 SF 0.5 $65.10 Interior WallsGypsum Wall Board 70 SF 0.5 $34.97 Interior WallsGypsum Wall Board 179 SF 0.5 $89.39 Interior WallsGypsum Wall Board 199 SF 0.5 $99.36 Interior WallsGypsum Wall Board 33 SF 0.5 $16.63 Interior WallsGypsum Wall Board 87 SF 0.5 $43.72 Interior WallsGypsum Wall Board 85 SF 0.5 $42.50 Interior WallsGypsum Wall Board 67 SF 0.5 $33.35 Interior WallsGypsum Wall Board 64 SF 0.5 $31.92 Interior WallsGypsum Wall Board 139 SF 0.5 $69.32 Interior WallsGypsum Wall Board 156 SF 0.5 $77.88 Interior WallsGypsum Wall Board 35 SF 0.5 $17.32 Interior WallsGypsum Wall Board 31 SF 0.5 $15.39 Interior WallsGypsum Wall Board 56 SF 0.5 $27.93 Interior WallsGypsum Wall Board 153 SF 0.5 $76.40 Interior WallsGypsum Wall Board 125 SF 0.5 $62.54 Interior Walls

Page 61: 2014%NESEA% COMPETITION% - Holyoke Redevelopment · Cities like Holyoke with brutal winter weather can benefit from this trapped solar heat that would ultimately reduce heating costs

Gypsum Wall Board 71 SF 0.5 $35.75 Interior WallsGypsum Wall Board 124 SF 0.5 $61.96 Interior WallsGypsum Wall Board 66 SF 0.5 $32.93 Interior WallsGypsum Wall Board 25 SF 0.5 $12.44 Interior WallsGypsum Wall Board 58 SF 0.5 $28.79 Interior WallsGypsum Wall Board 205 SF 0.5 $102.46 Interior WallsGypsum Wall Board 101 SF 0.5 $50.27 Interior WallsGypsum Wall Board 86 SF 0.5 $42.88 Interior WallsGypsum Wall Board 179 SF 0.5 $89.35 Interior WallsGypsum Wall Board 219 SF 0.5 $109.70 Interior WallsGypsum Wall Board 33 SF 0.5 $16.63 Interior WallsGypsum Wall Board 83 SF 0.5 $41.69 Interior WallsGypsum Wall Board 85 SF 0.5 $42.50 Interior WallsGypsum Wall Board 214 SF 0.5 $106.96 Interior WallsGypsum Wall Board 74 SF 0.5 $36.93 Interior WallsGypsum Wall Board 75 SF 0.5 $37.29 Interior WallsGypsum Wall Board 154 SF 0.5 $76.78 Interior WallsGypsum Wall Board 173 SF 0.5 $86.31 Interior WallsGypsum Wall Board 44 SF 0.5 $21.82 Interior WallsGypsum Wall Board 169 SF 0.5 $84.66 Interior WallsGypsum Wall Board 141 SF 0.5 $70.29 Interior WallsGypsum Wall Board 85 SF 0.5 $42.66 Interior WallsGypsum Wall Board 137 SF 0.5 $68.64 Interior WallsGypsum Wall Board 67 SF 0.5 $33.68 Interior WallsGypsum Wall Board 29 SF 0.5 $14.52 Interior WallsGypsum Wall Board 34 SF 0.5 $17.17 Interior WallsGypsum Wall Board 65 SF 0.5 $32.69 Interior WallsGypsum Wall Board 74 SF 0.5 $36.91 Interior WallsGypsum Wall Board 28 SF 0.5 $13.78 Interior WallsGypsum Wall Board 43 SF 0.5 $21.73 Interior WallsGypsum Wall Board 36 SF 0.5 $18.00 Interior WallsGypsum Wall Board 52 SF 0.5 $25.88 Interior WallsGypsum Wall Board 34 SF 0.5 $16.78 Interior WallsGypsum Wall Board 41 SF 0.5 $20.25 Interior WallsGypsum Wall Board 54 SF 0.5 $27.06 Interior WallsGypsum Wall Board 53 SF 0.5 $26.38 Interior WallsGypsum Wall Board 41 SF 0.5 $20.28 Interior WallsGypsum Wall Board 38 SF 0.5 $19.00 Interior WallsGypsum Wall Board 41 SF 0.5 $20.25 Interior WallsGypsum Wall Board 39 SF 0.5 $19.25 Interior WallsGypsum Wall Board 54 SF 0.5 $27.00 Interior WallsGypsum Wall Board 27 SF 0.5 $13.44 Interior WallsGypsum Wall Board 205 SF 0.5 $102.46 Interior WallsGypsum Wall Board 106 SF 0.5 $53.00 Interior WallsGypsum Wall Board 198 SF 0.5 $98.98 Interior WallsGypsum Wall Board 220 SF 0.5 $110.02 Interior WallsGypsum Wall Board 33 SF 0.5 $16.63 Interior Walls

Page 62: 2014%NESEA% COMPETITION% - Holyoke Redevelopment · Cities like Holyoke with brutal winter weather can benefit from this trapped solar heat that would ultimately reduce heating costs

Gypsum Wall Board 88 SF 0.5 $44.02 Interior WallsGypsum Wall Board 214 SF 0.5 $106.96 Interior WallsGypsum Wall Board 74 SF 0.5 $36.93 Interior WallsGypsum Wall Board 70 SF 0.5 $35.13 Interior WallsGypsum Wall Board 154 SF 0.5 $76.78 Interior WallsGypsum Wall Board 173 SF 0.5 $86.31 Interior WallsGypsum Wall Board 44 SF 0.5 $21.82 Interior WallsGypsum Wall Board 169 SF 0.5 $84.66 Interior WallsGypsum Wall Board 139 SF 0.5 $69.28 Interior WallsGypsum Wall Board 79 SF 0.5 $39.36 Interior WallsGypsum Wall Board 137 SF 0.5 $68.64 Interior WallsGypsum Wall Board 67 SF 0.5 $33.68 Interior WallsGypsum Wall Board 29 SF 0.5 $14.52 Interior WallsGypsum Wall Board 205 SF 0.5 $102.46 Interior WallsGypsum Wall Board 106 SF 0.5 $53.00 Interior WallsGypsum Wall Board 86 SF 0.5 $42.88 Interior WallsGypsum Wall Board 198 SF 0.5 $98.98 Interior WallsGypsum Wall Board 220 SF 0.5 $110.02 Interior WallsGypsum Wall Board 33 SF 0.5 $16.63 Interior WallsGypsum Wall Board 88 SF 0.5 $44.02 Interior WallsGypsum Wall Board 85 SF 0.5 $42.50 Interior WallsGypsum Wall Board 214 SF 0.5 $106.96 Interior WallsGypsum Wall Board 74 SF 0.5 $36.93 Interior WallsGypsum Wall Board 70 SF 0.5 $35.13 Interior WallsGypsum Wall Board 154 SF 0.5 $76.78 Interior WallsGypsum Wall Board 173 SF 0.5 $86.31 Interior WallsGypsum Wall Board 44 SF 0.5 $21.82 Interior WallsGypsum Wall Board 169 SF 0.5 $84.66 Interior WallsGypsum Wall Board 139 SF 0.5 $69.28 Interior WallsGypsum Wall Board 79 SF 0.5 $39.36 Interior WallsGypsum Wall Board 137 SF 0.5 $68.64 Interior WallsGypsum Wall Board 67 SF 0.5 $33.68 Interior WallsGypsum Wall Board 29 SF 0.5 $14.52 Interior WallsGypsum Wall Board 37 SF 0.5 $18.28 Interior WallsGypsum Wall Board 69 SF 0.5 $34.33 Interior WallsGypsum Wall Board 77 SF 0.5 $38.27 Interior WallsGypsum Wall Board 28 SF 0.5 $13.78 Interior WallsGypsum Wall Board 43 SF 0.5 $21.73 Interior WallsGypsum Wall Board 36 SF 0.5 $18.00 Interior WallsGypsum Wall Board 52 SF 0.5 $25.88 Interior WallsGypsum Wall Board 34 SF 0.5 $16.78 Interior WallsGypsum Wall Board 41 SF 0.5 $20.25 Interior WallsGypsum Wall Board 54 SF 0.5 $27.06 Interior WallsGypsum Wall Board 53 SF 0.5 $26.38 Interior WallsWool 93 SF 7.5 $699.07 Interior WallsWool 65 SF 7.5 $488.28 Interior WallsWool 35 SF 7.5 $262.30 Interior Walls

Page 63: 2014%NESEA% COMPETITION% - Holyoke Redevelopment · Cities like Holyoke with brutal winter weather can benefit from this trapped solar heat that would ultimately reduce heating costs

Wool 89 SF 7.5 $670.41 Interior WallsWool 99 SF 7.5 $745.21 Interior WallsWool 17 SF 7.5 $124.69 Interior WallsWool 44 SF 7.5 $327.94 Interior WallsWool 43 SF 7.5 $318.75 Interior WallsWool 33 SF 7.5 $250.10 Interior WallsWool 32 SF 7.5 $239.44 Interior WallsWool 69 SF 7.5 $519.87 Interior WallsWool 78 SF 7.5 $584.12 Interior WallsWool 17 SF 7.5 $129.88 Interior WallsWool 15 SF 7.5 $115.45 Interior WallsWool 28 SF 7.5 $209.46 Interior WallsWool 76 SF 7.5 $572.97 Interior WallsWool 63 SF 7.5 $469.07 Interior WallsWool 36 SF 7.5 $268.09 Interior WallsWool 62 SF 7.5 $464.72 Interior WallsWool 33 SF 7.5 $246.96 Interior WallsWool 12 SF 7.5 $93.29 Interior WallsWool 29 SF 7.5 $215.90 Interior WallsWool 102 SF 7.5 $768.44 Interior WallsWool 50 SF 7.5 $377.02 Interior WallsWool 43 SF 7.5 $321.56 Interior WallsWool 89 SF 7.5 $670.15 Interior WallsWool 110 SF 7.5 $822.72 Interior WallsWool 17 SF 7.5 $124.69 Interior WallsWool 42 SF 7.5 $312.65 Interior WallsWool 43 SF 7.5 $318.75 Interior WallsWool 107 SF 7.5 $802.19 Interior WallsWool 37 SF 7.5 $277.01 Interior WallsWool 37 SF 7.5 $279.64 Interior WallsWool 77 SF 7.5 $575.83 Interior WallsWool 86 SF 7.5 $647.31 Interior WallsWool 22 SF 7.5 $163.62 Interior WallsWool 85 SF 7.5 $634.96 Interior WallsWool 70 SF 7.5 $527.15 Interior WallsWool 43 SF 7.5 $319.98 Interior WallsWool 69 SF 7.5 $514.79 Interior WallsWool 34 SF 7.5 $252.62 Interior WallsWool 15 SF 7.5 $108.93 Interior WallsWool 17 SF 7.5 $128.78 Interior WallsWool 33 SF 7.5 $245.14 Interior WallsWool 37 SF 7.5 $276.85 Interior WallsWool 14 SF 7.5 $103.33 Interior WallsWool 22 SF 7.5 $163.01 Interior WallsWool 18 SF 7.5 $135.00 Interior WallsWool 26 SF 7.5 $194.07 Interior WallsWool 17 SF 7.5 $125.83 Interior Walls

Page 64: 2014%NESEA% COMPETITION% - Holyoke Redevelopment · Cities like Holyoke with brutal winter weather can benefit from this trapped solar heat that would ultimately reduce heating costs

Wool 20 SF 7.5 $151.88 Interior WallsWool 27 SF 7.5 $202.95 Interior WallsWool 26 SF 7.5 $197.81 Interior WallsWool 20 SF 7.5 $152.11 Interior WallsWool 19 SF 7.5 $142.51 Interior WallsWool 20 SF 7.5 $151.88 Interior WallsWool 19 SF 7.5 $144.38 Interior WallsWool 27 SF 7.5 $202.50 Interior WallsWool 13 SF 7.5 $100.78 Interior WallsWool 102 SF 7.5 $768.44 Interior WallsWool 53 SF 7.5 $397.50 Interior WallsWool 99 SF 7.5 $742.32 Interior WallsWool 110 SF 7.5 $825.19 Interior WallsWool 17 SF 7.5 $124.69 Interior WallsWool 44 SF 7.5 $330.13 Interior WallsWool 107 SF 7.5 $802.19 Interior WallsWool 37 SF 7.5 $277.01 Interior WallsWool 35 SF 7.5 $263.47 Interior WallsWool 77 SF 7.5 $575.83 Interior WallsWool 86 SF 7.5 $647.31 Interior WallsWool 22 SF 7.5 $163.62 Interior WallsWool 85 SF 7.5 $634.96 Interior WallsWool 69 SF 7.5 $519.61 Interior WallsWool 39 SF 7.5 $295.21 Interior WallsWool 69 SF 7.5 $514.79 Interior WallsWool 34 SF 7.5 $252.62 Interior WallsWool 15 SF 7.5 $108.93 Interior WallsWool 102 SF 7.5 $768.44 Interior WallsWool 53 SF 7.5 $397.50 Interior WallsWool 43 SF 7.5 $321.56 Interior WallsWool 99 SF 7.5 $742.32 Interior WallsWool 110 SF 7.5 $825.19 Interior WallsWool 17 SF 7.5 $124.69 Interior WallsWool 44 SF 7.5 $330.13 Interior WallsWool 43 SF 7.5 $318.75 Interior WallsWool 107 SF 7.5 $802.19 Interior WallsWool 37 SF 7.5 $277.01 Interior WallsWool 35 SF 7.5 $263.47 Interior WallsWool 77 SF 7.5 $575.83 Interior WallsWool 86 SF 7.5 $647.31 Interior WallsWool 22 SF 7.5 $163.62 Interior WallsWool 85 SF 7.5 $634.96 Interior WallsWool 69 SF 7.5 $519.61 Interior WallsWool 39 SF 7.5 $295.21 Interior WallsWool 69 SF 7.5 $514.79 Interior WallsWool 34 SF 7.5 $252.62 Interior WallsWool 15 SF 7.5 $108.93 Interior Walls

Page 65: 2014%NESEA% COMPETITION% - Holyoke Redevelopment · Cities like Holyoke with brutal winter weather can benefit from this trapped solar heat that would ultimately reduce heating costs

Wool 18 SF 7.5 $137.11 Interior WallsWool 34 SF 7.5 $257.48 Interior WallsWool 38 SF 7.5 $287.01 Interior WallsWool 14 SF 7.5 $103.33 Interior WallsWool 22 SF 7.5 $163.01 Interior WallsWool 18 SF 7.5 $135.00 Interior WallsWool 26 SF 7.5 $194.07 Interior WallsWool 17 SF 7.5 $125.83 Interior WallsWool 20 SF 7.5 $151.88 Interior WallsWool 27 SF 7.5 $202.95 Interior WallsWool 26 SF 7.5 $197.81 Interior WallsConcrete Masonry Units 102 SF 15.2 $1,551.47 Semi-exposedConcrete Masonry Units 115 SF 15.2 $1,753.74 Semi-exposedConcrete Masonry Units 52 SF 15.2 $787.31 Semi-exposedConcrete Masonry Units 65 SF 15.2 $988.00 Semi-exposedConcrete Masonry Units 71 SF 15.2 $1,086.21 Semi-exposedConcrete Masonry Units 52 SF 15.2 $786.60 Semi-exposedConcrete Masonry Units 126 SF 15.2 $1,911.52 Semi-exposedConcrete Masonry Units 32 SF 15.2 $488.01 Semi-exposedConcrete Masonry Units 73 SF 15.2 $1,111.50 Semi-exposedConcrete Masonry Units 128 SF 15.2 $1,950.08 Semi-exposedConcrete Masonry Units 136 SF 15.2 $2,074.08 Semi-exposedConcrete Masonry Units 12 SF 15.2 $179.94 Semi-exposedConcrete Masonry Units 116 SF 15.2 $1,760.36 Semi-exposedConcrete Masonry Units 72 SF 15.2 $1,094.40 Semi-exposedConcrete Masonry Units 79 SF 15.2 $1,200.97 Semi-exposedConcrete Masonry Units 51 SF 15.2 $773.85 Semi-exposedConcrete Masonry Units 131 SF 15.2 $1,996.54 Semi-exposedConcrete Masonry Units 35 SF 15.2 $531.80 Semi-exposedConcrete Masonry Units 81 SF 15.2 $1,231.20 Semi-exposedConcrete Masonry Units 14 SF 15.2 $216.81 Semi-exposedConcrete Masonry Units 147 SF 15.2 $2,236.68 Semi-exposedConcrete Masonry Units 12 SF 15.2 $179.94 Semi-exposedConcrete Masonry Units 116 SF 15.2 $1,760.36 Semi-exposedConcrete Masonry Units 72 SF 15.2 $1,094.40 Semi-exposedConcrete Masonry Units 79 SF 15.2 $1,203.19 Semi-exposedConcrete Masonry Units 52 SF 15.2 $786.60 Semi-exposedConcrete Masonry Units 142 SF 15.2 $2,165.43 Semi-exposedConcrete Masonry Units 36 SF 15.2 $540.56 Semi-exposedConcrete Masonry Units 81 SF 15.2 $1,231.20 Semi-exposedConcrete Masonry Units 14 SF 15.2 $216.81 Semi-exposedConcrete Masonry Units 147 SF 15.2 $2,236.68 Semi-exposedConcrete Masonry Units 12 SF 15.2 $179.94 Semi-exposedConcrete Masonry Units 116 SF 15.2 $1,760.36 Semi-exposedConcrete Masonry Units 72 SF 15.2 $1,094.40 Semi-exposedConcrete Masonry Units 79 SF 15.2 $1,203.19 Semi-exposedConcrete Masonry Units 52 SF 15.2 $786.60 Semi-exposed

Page 66: 2014%NESEA% COMPETITION% - Holyoke Redevelopment · Cities like Holyoke with brutal winter weather can benefit from this trapped solar heat that would ultimately reduce heating costs

Concrete Masonry Units 142 SF 15.2 $2,165.43 Semi-exposedConcrete Masonry Units 36 SF 15.2 $540.56 Semi-exposedConcrete Masonry Units 81 SF 15.2 $1,231.20 Semi-exposedConcrete Masonry Units 14 SF 15.2 $216.81 Semi-exposedGypsum Wall Board 204 SF 0.5 $102.07 Semi-exposedGypsum Wall Board 231 SF 0.5 $115.38 Semi-exposedGypsum Wall Board 104 SF 0.5 $51.80 Semi-exposedGypsum Wall Board 130 SF 0.5 $65.00 Semi-exposedGypsum Wall Board 142 SF 0.5 $70.78 Semi-exposedGypsum Wall Board 104 SF 0.5 $51.75 Semi-exposedGypsum Wall Board 252 SF 0.5 $125.76 Semi-exposedGypsum Wall Board 64 SF 0.5 $32.11 Semi-exposedGypsum Wall Board 146 SF 0.5 $73.12 Semi-exposedGypsum Wall Board 257 SF 0.5 $128.29 Semi-exposedGypsum Wall Board 273 SF 0.5 $136.45 Semi-exposedGypsum Wall Board 24 SF 0.5 $11.84 Semi-exposedGypsum Wall Board 232 SF 0.5 $115.81 Semi-exposedGypsum Wall Board 144 SF 0.5 $72.00 Semi-exposedGypsum Wall Board 157 SF 0.5 $78.26 Semi-exposedGypsum Wall Board 99 SF 0.5 $49.65 Semi-exposedGypsum Wall Board 263 SF 0.5 $131.35 Semi-exposedGypsum Wall Board 68 SF 0.5 $34.12 Semi-exposedGypsum Wall Board 162 SF 0.5 $81.00 Semi-exposedGypsum Wall Board 25 SF 0.5 $12.60 Semi-exposedGypsum Wall Board 294 SF 0.5 $147.15 Semi-exposedGypsum Wall Board 24 SF 0.5 $11.84 Semi-exposedGypsum Wall Board 232 SF 0.5 $115.81 Semi-exposedGypsum Wall Board 144 SF 0.5 $72.00 Semi-exposedGypsum Wall Board 157 SF 0.5 $78.41 Semi-exposedGypsum Wall Board 104 SF 0.5 $51.75 Semi-exposedGypsum Wall Board 285 SF 0.5 $142.46 Semi-exposedGypsum Wall Board 71 SF 0.5 $35.56 Semi-exposedGypsum Wall Board 162 SF 0.5 $81.00 Semi-exposedGypsum Wall Board 25 SF 0.5 $12.60 Semi-exposedGypsum Wall Board 294 SF 0.5 $147.15 Semi-exposedGypsum Wall Board 24 SF 0.5 $11.84 Semi-exposedGypsum Wall Board 232 SF 0.5 $115.81 Semi-exposedGypsum Wall Board 144 SF 0.5 $72.00 Semi-exposedGypsum Wall Board 157 SF 0.5 $78.41 Semi-exposedGypsum Wall Board 104 SF 0.5 $51.75 Semi-exposedGypsum Wall Board 285 SF 0.5 $142.46 Semi-exposedGypsum Wall Board 71 SF 0.5 $35.56 Semi-exposedGypsum Wall Board 162 SF 0.5 $81.00 Semi-exposedGypsum Wall Board 25 SF 0.5 $12.60 Semi-exposedAir 33 SF 0 $0.00 Stone facade wallAir 85 SF 0 $0.00 Stone facade wallAir 395 SF 0 $0.00 Stone facade wall

Page 67: 2014%NESEA% COMPETITION% - Holyoke Redevelopment · Cities like Holyoke with brutal winter weather can benefit from this trapped solar heat that would ultimately reduce heating costs

Air 91 SF 0 $0.00 Stone facade wallAir Infiltration Barrier 33 SF 0.1 $3.26 Stone facade wallAir Infiltration Barrier 85 SF 0.1 $8.50 Stone facade wallAir Infiltration Barrier 395 SF 0.1 $39.54 Stone facade wallAir Infiltration Barrier 91 SF 0.1 $9.10 Stone facade wallGypsum Wall Board 33 SF 0.5 $16.30 Stone facade wallGypsum Wall Board 85 SF 0.5 $42.52 Stone facade wallGypsum Wall Board 395 SF 0.5 $197.72 Stone facade wallGypsum Wall Board 91 SF 0.5 $45.48 Stone facade wallPolyisocyanurate Insulation Boards 33 SF 1.9 $61.95 Stone facade wallPolyisocyanurate Insulation Boards 85 SF 1.9 $161.56 Stone facade wallPolyisocyanurate Insulation Boards 395 SF 1.9 $751.33 Stone facade wallPolyisocyanurate Insulation Boards 91 SF 1.9 $172.84 Stone facade wallstone finish 33 SF 15 $489.06 Stone facade wallstone finish 85 SF 15 $1,275.47 Stone facade wallstone finish 395 SF 15 $5,931.51 Stone facade wallstone finish 91 SF 15 $1,364.54 Stone facade wallCellulose Insulation 33 SF 0 $0.00 Stone facade wallCellulose Insulation 85 SF 0 $0.00 Stone facade wallCellulose Insulation 395 SF 0 $0.00 Stone facade wallCellulose Insulation 91 SF 0 $0.00 Stone facade wallVapor Retarder 33 SF 0.12 $3.91 Stone facade wallVapor Retarder 85 SF 0.12 $10.20 Stone facade wallVapor Retarder 395 SF 0.12 $47.45 Stone facade wallVapor Retarder 91 SF 0.12 $10.92 Stone facade wallGrand total: 398 $233,650.34

Page 68: 2014%NESEA% COMPETITION% - Holyoke Redevelopment · Cities like Holyoke with brutal winter weather can benefit from this trapped solar heat that would ultimately reduce heating costs

Floor ScheduleFamily Type Area Unit Cost Total Cost

Floor concrete slab with carpet finish 186 SF 2 $372.26Floor concrete slab with carpet finish 31 SF 2 $62.44Floor concrete slab with carpet finish 31 SF 2 $62.44Floor concrete slab with carpet finish 31 SF 2 $62.44Floor concrete slab with tile 156 SF 2 $311.11Floor concrete slab with tile 152 SF 2 $304.07Floor concrete slab with tile 152 SF 2 $304.07Floor concrete slab with tile 152 SF 2 $304.07Floor Concrete slab with wood finish 1497 SF 2 $2,993.43Floor Concrete slab with wood finish 1666 SF 2 $3,331.43Floor Concrete slab with wood finish 1666 SF 2 $3,331.59Floor Concrete slab with wood finish 1666 SF 2 $3,331.59Floor Generic - 9" 65 SF 2 $130.73Floor Generic - 9" 66 SF 2 $131.52Floor Generic - 9" 14 SF 2 $28.35Floor Generic - 9" 23 SF 2 $46.97Floor Generic - 9" 65 SF 2 $130.73Floor Generic - 9" 66 SF 2 $131.52Floor Generic - 9" 65 SF 2 $130.73Floor Generic - 9" 66 SF 2 $131.52Floor Generic - 13" 2200 SF 2.9 $6,380.60Floor Generic - 13" 3525 SF 2.9 $10,222.24Floor Generic - 13" 1320 SF 2.9 $3,829.30Grand total: 23 $36,065.17

Page 69: 2014%NESEA% COMPETITION% - Holyoke Redevelopment · Cities like Holyoke with brutal winter weather can benefit from this trapped solar heat that would ultimately reduce heating costs

Unit Price Number of Total CostHVAC 2000 8 $16,000.00Elevator 20000 1 $20,000.00Stairs 2000 4 $8,000.00Grey water 3480 1 $3,480.00Total $47,480.00

PV Panels 850 120 $102,000.00Solar Pane 681.9 8 $5,455.20Total $107,455.20

Roof struct $11,424.00Joist $17,280.00Total $28,704.00

Page 70: 2014%NESEA% COMPETITION% - Holyoke Redevelopment · Cities like Holyoke with brutal winter weather can benefit from this trapped solar heat that would ultimately reduce heating costs

Total EvaluationType Cost ($)Type CostElectrical 65000Envelope 20130Other 47480RET (PV and so 107455Plumbing 90000Wall 233650Floor 36065Roof 28704Total 628484

total sqft: 9900construction c $63.48

Electrical10%

Envelope3%

Other8%

RET (PV and solar panels)

17%

Plumbing14% Wall

37%

Floor6%

Roof5%

Structure48%

Construction Cost

Electrical Envelope Other

RET (PV and solar panels) Plumbing Wall

Floor Roof

Page 71: 2014%NESEA% COMPETITION% - Holyoke Redevelopment · Cities like Holyoke with brutal winter weather can benefit from this trapped solar heat that would ultimately reduce heating costs

REPEATABLE DESIGN

OPEN FLOOR PLAN COMMUNITY LIVING

The use of solar energy is integral to the ZERA design. ZERA were designed to use daylighting, passive solar heating, thermal mass effects, solar panels, and PV systems. This appropriation of natural solar effects allows for reduced energy loadings on the structures and provides clean sustainable energy.

Each apartment opens up into an open living area with a

connected kitchen and dining area. This is combined with

floor to ceiling windows in the living area and countertop

windows in the kitchen to create a feeling of being connected

to outdoors.

With 8 apartments per module (7 two bedroom, and one single

bedroom), an underground parking garage, floor to ceiling

windows, and enough space on the lot to have a front or back

yard to can be used for community gardens or grey water

collection, These apartment modules create a livable space with

connections to the outdoors and the community.

ZERA are designed without windows on the east and west facing exteriors to allow for side to side construction without view obstruction. This allows for higher building density.

SOLAR INTEGRATION

Holyoke, MA is an historical industrial New England city. Its industries used to harness the power of the

Connecticut river to stimulate the regional economy. In this city, ZERA, Zero Energy Repeatable Apartments,

will rise! ZERA strives to harness another natural energy source, the Sun. In the tradition of Holyoke, ZERA is

not exceptionally tall (four stories only) and the exterior facades are a mix of stone and brick so that the

apartments become part of the community of Holyoke, rather than unique architectural entities.

Page 72: 2014%NESEA% COMPETITION% - Holyoke Redevelopment · Cities like Holyoke with brutal winter weather can benefit from this trapped solar heat that would ultimately reduce heating costs

Using the energy analysis software Design Builder (which works with the Energy Plus engine), a heat and energy profile of the

apartment design was created. This analysis confirmed assumptions that heating, cooling, and hot water generation would be the

primary energy consumers of the ZERA buildings. It was also determined that a module (eight houses) consumes 53,032 kWh/y

(74.15kWh/m2). Using PV panels, the modules become zero-energy. The above graph shows the fresh air profiles inside the ZERA

buildings too. Several comfort analysis were done in order to proof the respect of the standard AHSRAE 55-2013.

During the pre-design phase, Ecotect Analysis 2011 was used to

create psychometric charts using climate data for Chicopee Falls,

MA as a stand in for Holyoke, MA. Using the design techniques

overlays, the passive solar heating and thermal mass effects were

chosen as passive strategies to reduce the energy loads of the

buildings. Later analysis was done using the Design Builder.

The overall estimated construction material cost of a single

module is over $600,000 (about $65 per sqft) with over

$100,000 of that being the initial cost of the PV and Solar

panels. The PV and Solar panels will pay for themselves in

16 years, effectively reducing the cost of the structure by

almost 18%.

Electrical10%

Envelope3%

Other8%

RET (PV and solar panels)

17%

Plumbing14% Wall

37%

Floor6%

Roof5%

Structure48%

Construction Cost

Electrical Envelope

Other RET (PV and solar panels)

Plumbing Wall

Floor Roof


Top Related