Download - Bayer Genç Bilim Elçileri - Ara Rapor
-
8/2/2019 Bayer Gen Bilim Elileri - Ara Rapor
1/69
BAYER YOUNG SCIENCE AMBASSADORS
0
BAYER YOUNG SCIENCE AMBASSADORS
OCTOBER 2011FEBRUARY 2012
MIDTERM REPORT
-
8/2/2019 Bayer Gen Bilim Elileri - Ara Rapor
2/69
BAYER YOUNG SCIENCE AMBASSADORS
1
CONTENTS
Executive Summary............................................................................................................................................ 2
Project Summary................................................................................................................................................ 4
Project Statistics ................................................................................................................................................. 6
Project Content................................................................................................................................................... 8
Project Activities................................................................................................................................................. 9
Determination of TOG Volunteers ................................................................................................................ 15
Scientific Literacy Training ............................................................................................................................ 15
Press Conference .............................................................................................................................................. 16
Science Workshop ............................................................................................................................................ 17
Project Team..................................................................................................................................................... 18
Mid-Term Evaluation Report ........................................................................................................................ 19
Links ................................................................................................................................................................. 68
-
8/2/2019 Bayer Gen Bilim Elileri - Ara Rapor
3/69
BAYER YOUNG SCIENCE AMBASSADORS
2
BAYER YOUNG SCIENCE AMBASSADORS MIDTERM REPORT
Project Name Bayer Young Science Ambassadors (BYSA)
Project Partners Bayer Turk & Toplum Gnllleri Vakf (TOG)
Financial Supporter Bayer Turk
Implementation
Period
01.09.201130.05.2012
Reporting Period 01.09.201129.02.2012
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Science is always considered to be redundant for society in Turkey. One of the most important issues of that
understanding comes from the very pragmatic approach that the economic return must be very quick in one
humans life. There is a general opinion that the individuals that work for science cannot earn enough money
for their life. This understanding affects the scientific literacy of the people very negatively. From primary to
the higher education level, the approach to science is not welcomed or promoted. The curriculums are not
enough for the promotion of the science. The text books do not adequately promote the learning process itself
and the formal education cannot achieve to foster the creative and critical thinking of the scientific literacy.
According to the PISA 20061, looking at the performance in Science and self-efficacy in science, Turkeys
rank is at the lower mean performance in science.
As the science begins early in childhood, it is a must to empower the children in the age of primary school.
During this time interval young peoples role is very important for children as they are big sisters and brothers
who shall act as the agents of encouraging.
Through partnership of Bayer Turkey and TOG, a new scientific literacy training model designed that based
on non-formal techniques in which TOG has great experience and know-how.
TOG, as a youth NGO that gathers young people all over Turkey on the different subjects on the local,
national and international level, creates participation areas for the empowerment of young people and use non
formal education tools to spread the idea and vision. The project increases the scientific literacy amongst
young people through a non formal training tool and young people, as a multiplier and the agents of change,
support the learning of children in primary school. The understanding of the science is needless for the
society will be changed through the participation of young people as Science Ambassadors exists now and
after. Young people are being role models for the children now and will be in the future.
1 http://www.pisa.oecd.org/document/2/0,3343,en_32252351_32236191_39718850_1_1_1_1,00.html . PISA measures scientific literacy across acontinuum from basic literacy skills through high levels of knowledge of scientific concepts and examines students capacity to use their understandingof these concepts and to think scientifically about real-life problems. p. 13 in the executive summary
http://www.pisa.oecd.org/document/2/0,3343,en_32252351_32236191_39718850_1_1_1_1,00.htmlhttp://www.pisa.oecd.org/document/2/0,3343,en_32252351_32236191_39718850_1_1_1_1,00.html -
8/2/2019 Bayer Gen Bilim Elileri - Ara Rapor
4/69
BAYER YOUNG SCIENCE AMBASSADORS
3
The aims of the BYSA Project;
By creating the scientific literacy amongst Young Community Volunteers (age between 17-25);
Supporting the science education
Supporting the children and their learning process at primary schools (age between 10-12)
The main objectives of the BYSA Project;
Accordingly, the main objective of the project is to improve the scientific literacy level of its target groups
(6th, 7
thand 8
thgrade primary school students and young community volunteers ) by providing space for them
to;
Get motivated to learn about and understand nature,
Have curiosity about science and technology,
Try to understand the interrelations among science, technology, society and environment,
Get willing to question, reason and understand the happenings and facts in nature
Question their prejudices about science and scientists
Understand and appreciate the value of science and technology.
Through the partnership of Bayer Turkey and TOG, between Oct 2011 and Feb 2012,
Project team was built up by project coordinator.
Project Content was prepared and booklets for young science ambassadors and for children were
written by the project consultant.
Tools for monitoring and evaluation of the project were designed by the external expert.
24 Young TOG volunteers participated in the Scientific Literacy Training that took place in Istanbul.24 young science ambassadors shared their knowledge and experiences with the other volunteers in
their local communities in order to expand the project team and reach more primary school children.
In total, 76 young science ambassadors reached 275 children until the end of Feb 2012.
A Press Conference organized by Bayer Turkey with the attendance of TOG and young science
ambassadors in Dec 2012.
A Science Workshop was carried out by 8 young science ambassadors at TOG 19.Youth Councilwhere approximately 300 young volunteers participated.
Field visits to local project groups were done by project team.
A Semi-structured Evaluation Meeting organized by project team with 10 young science ambassadors.
-
8/2/2019 Bayer Gen Bilim Elileri - Ara Rapor
5/69
BAYER YOUNG SCIENCE AMBASSADORS
4
PROJECT SUMMARY
Implementation Area
stanbul, Ankara, zmir and Kars
TOG Youth Organizations Implementing the Project
stanbul University, Maltepe University, Hacettepe University, Kafkas University, Dokuz Eyll University
TOG Groups.
Project Implemented Primary Schools:
Primary schools were determined with the assistance of the Directorates of Education.
stanbul:Ktip Kasm lkretim Okulu
Tevfik Kut lkretim Okulu
Ali hsan Hayrlolu lkretim Okulu
Ankara: Trk i Bloklar lkretim Okulu
Kars: Atatrk lkretim Okulu
Fevzi Paa lkretim Okulu
zmir: Zehra Semahat Erien lkretim Okulu
-
8/2/2019 Bayer Gen Bilim Elileri - Ara Rapor
6/69
BAYER YOUNG SCIENCE AMBASSADORS
5
Kars
Target Group
The children in the project implemented primary schools (age between 10-12)The young people at the TOG Youth Organizations in the universities (age between 1725)
The Aims of the Pilot Project
By creating the scientific literacy amongst Young Community Volunteers (age between 17-25);
Supporting the science education
Supporting the children and their learning process at primary schools (age between 10-12)
The Main Objectives of the Pilot Project
Accordingly, the main objective of the project is to improve the scientific literacy level of its target groups
(6th, 7
thand 8
thgrade primary school students and young community volunteers ) by providing space for them
to;
Get motivated to learn about and understand nature,
Have curiosity about science and technology,
Try to understand the interrelations among science, technology, society and environment,
Get willing to question, reason and understand the happenings and facts in nature
Question their prejudices about science and scientists
Understand and appreciate the value of science and technology.
-
8/2/2019 Bayer Gen Bilim Elileri - Ara Rapor
7/69
BAYER YOUNG SCIENCE AMBASSADORS
6
Project Partners
Ministry of Education
Bayer Turk
TOG Vakf
Expected Outcomes
A unique non formal training module on scientific literacy will be developed
24 young community volunteers will be the Science Ambassadors
900 children will be scientific literate citizenry for the pilot period in 4 primary school
PROJECT STATISTICS
24 TOG Volunteers participated in Scientific Literacy Training to be young science ambassadors which was
held in Istanbul between Nov 30thDec 4th.
Gender Distribution of the participants:
Table 1:
City / Gender Female Male
Istanbul 5 1
Ankara 2 4
Izmir 3 3
Kars 3 3
Total 13 11
24
Gender equality and positive discrimination were two of the criteria of selection process.
In total, 76 young science ambassadors and 275 children joined the project between Sep 2011 - Feb 2012 in
four cities. The number of the young science ambassadors did not show a significant difference by cities.
Getting the legal permissions from Directorates of Education took different durations in each city. Therefore
each project group started volunteering at different times.
-
8/2/2019 Bayer Gen Bilim Elileri - Ara Rapor
8/69
BAYER YOUNG SCIENCE AMBASSADORS
7
Table 2: Participation of BYSA
City BYSA
Istanbul 16
Ankara 22
Izmir 23
Kars 15
Total 76
In the pilot period of the Project, those activities were done by the end of Feb 2012: Getting Legal
Permissions from Directorates of Education, Building up the Project Team, Developing the Training Module,
Determining the Youth Organizations joining the Project, Training of Local Project Groups, Determination of
the Project Implementation Schools, Determination of the Children in the Project, Monitoring and Evaluation,
Communication, Mid-Term Reporting and Project Coordination.
Table 3, below, shows the timetable of the activities.
Table 3: Project Activities by the end of Feb 2012
Activities Months 9 10 11 12 1 2
Getting Legal Permissions from Directorates of Education
Building up the Project Team
Developing the Training Module
Determining the Youth Organizations joining the Project
Training of the Local Project Groups
Determination of the Project Implementation Schools
Determination of the Children in the Project
Monitoring & Evaluation
Communication
Reporting
Project Coordination
-
8/2/2019 Bayer Gen Bilim Elileri - Ara Rapor
9/69
BAYER YOUNG SCIENCE AMBASSADORS
8
PROJECT CONTENT
General Aim of the workshops
Children have a natural curiosity about the things happening around them. Curiosity is the main trigger of
learning. With this two days workshop, by the natural curiosity of children, the Project is aiming to get their
attraction focused on science by experiencing enjoyable experiments. And with that experience, children see
that in order to make science, people do not need any special materials or any special places. Science is
everywhere and making science is not boring but fun!
The whole Project content is designed with a children centered approach based on participation. The
workshops provide children a learning environment for creativity, ability to discuss and research and a skillfor observation about the understanding ofnature of science which is a part ofscientific literacy.
Accordingly, the main objective of the project is to improve the scientific literacy level of its target groups
(6th, 7
thand 8
thgrade primary school students and young community volunteers ) by providing space for them
to;
Get motivated to learn about and understand nature,
Have curiosity about science and technology,
Try to understand the interrelations among science, technology, society and environment,Get willing to question, reason and understand the happenings and facts in nature
Question their prejudices about science and scientists
Understand and appreciate the value of science and technology.
Principles of the workshops:
There are some principles of workshops related with Project aims and objectives.
All workshops will be done with a group size of 16-20 children. They will work in small groups of 4-
5.
A calm and relaxing environment will support the learning process of both children and young science
ambassadors. The more they enjoy, the more they learn and share with each other.
Each child should actively participate in workshops.
Energizers are used to raise the level of attention and motivation.
For the safety of the children, while using hot water or scissors, young volunteers need to support
them.
Young science ambassadors are responsible for time management of the activities.
-
8/2/2019 Bayer Gen Bilim Elileri - Ara Rapor
10/69
BAYER YOUNG SCIENCE AMBASSADORS
9
PROJECT ACTIVITIES
It takes 2 days to implement the whole program in the primary schools for each group of 16-20 children.
Table 4: The 2 days program
Duration Activity
DAY 1
30 min Getting to know each otherScience Bingo
20 min Exp 1: Do flowers drink water?
15 min Break
40 min Exp 2: Let's make a thermometer!
15 min Break
40 min Exp 3: Colors dancing in the milk!
15 min Break
10 min Energizer: Molecules
20 min Exp 4: Screaming balloons
25 min Closing session: Groups poster
DAY 2
15 min Continue to Exp 1: Do flowers drink water?
5 min Grouping Activity: Colorful Dots
40 min Exp 5: Is black really black?
15 min Break
15 min Energizer: Solar System
40 min Exp 6: Homemade Ice cream
15 min Break
30 min Exp 7: The chemical of red cabbage
10 min Crossword Puzzle
30 min
Closing session: Writing a letter
What kind of a scientist would I like to be?
-
8/2/2019 Bayer Gen Bilim Elileri - Ara Rapor
11/69
BAYER YOUNG SCIENCE AMBASSADORS
10
What children think and share:
-
8/2/2019 Bayer Gen Bilim Elileri - Ara Rapor
12/69
BAYER YOUNG SCIENCE AMBASSADORS
11
AIMS AND OUTPUTS OF EXPERIMENTS
Experiment 1:
Do Flowers Drink Water?
Istanbul Izmir
Children use 3 cups of water mixed with food coloring and 1 cup of plain water. Then they set the flowers in
the cups and observe the change.
With this experiment, children can discover for themselves how essential the functions of roots and stems are
to plant growth. As the colored water is absorbed, students are able to see how the water is absorbed into the
plant and amazed when the petals of the carnation change color.2
The children observe how important water is for all living things. Human beings need to take precautions in
order to use water in an efficient way such as through the reuse of wastewater or getting drinkable water out
of oceans.
2http://www.stevespanglerscience.com/experiment/colorful-carnations
-
8/2/2019 Bayer Gen Bilim Elileri - Ara Rapor
13/69
BAYER YOUNG SCIENCE AMBASSADORS
12
Experiment 2:
Lets Make a Thermometer!
With this experiment, children are making a thermometer out
of water. They can measure temperature with this homemade
thermometer.
Water, like all substances, is comprised of molecules. In
water, an individual molecule has the chemical formula H2O,
dihydrogen monoxide. When water molecules are heated,
their bonds stretch out and expand and the opposite happens
when water is cooled. So, the water level in the straw rises
when the water is heated, it lowers when the water is cooled. 3
The children learn how the global climate change affects life on earth and why it is a problem if the earths
temperature gets warmer. Then they also learn that they can fix climate change with some small changes in
their own lives such as turning the lights off, eating home food, getting their parents to change their
consuming habits and reusing, recycling and reducing buying something which they really do not need to.
Experiment 3:
Colors Dancing in the Milk!
With this experiment children uncover the secrets of the
soap which is a great demonstration of what happens
when we combine dish soap and milk. They mix a little
milk, food coloring, and a drop of liquid soap.
Milk is mostly water but it also contains vitamins,
minerals, proteins, and tiny droplets of fat suspended in
solution. Fats and proteins are sensitive to changes in
the surrounding solution (the milk). The soap weakens
the chemical bonds that hold the proteins and fats in
solution. So the colors begin dancing in the milk.4
Children learn the importance and effect of soap on cleaning and why we people wash our hands with soap.
3http://www.stevespanglerscience.com/experiment/water-thermometer-sick-science
4http://www.stevespanglerscience.com/experiment/milk-color-explosion
Scientific Literacy Training
Izmir
-
8/2/2019 Bayer Gen Bilim Elileri - Ara Rapor
14/69
BAYER YOUNG SCIENCE AMBASSADORS
13
Experiment 4:
Screaming Balloons
Children put a hexagon nut in the balloon and hold it with
both hands and make a swirling motion. Then they have
the screaming voice.
The unique shape of the hex nut vibrates the walls of the
balloon to produce a wonderfully screaming sound. They
try the same process with the circular pellet. This time
they do not get the screaming sound as there is no
vibration on the walls of the balloon. 5
With this experiment children observe both the sound and
motion.
Experiment 5:
Is Black Really Black?
Using a technique called chromatography, children find out exactlywhat makes up the color in the black pen.
Theres literally a rainbow of color hiding in just one black dot!
Children put black dots on filter paper; put a toy brush in the very
center of the filter paper. Then lay down the paper on a plastic glass
full of water. The burst of color that you see on the filter paper
proves that black is really a combination of colors.
This technique of color separation is actually
called chromatography, which was originally used to separate
different plant pigments. 6
5http://www.stevespanglerscience.com/product/screaming-balloon-kit
6http://www.stevespanglerscience.com/experiment/is-black-black
Istanbul
TOG 19. Youth Council
-
8/2/2019 Bayer Gen Bilim Elileri - Ara Rapor
15/69
BAYER YOUNG SCIENCE AMBASSADORS
14
Experiment 6:
Homemade Ice-cream
Children are making ice-cream with cream, sugar,
crushed salt, vanilla and ice.
The science in making ice-cream is to lower the
freezing point of ice in order to freeze the cream. But
how?
Just like we use salt on icy roads in the winter, salt
mixed with ice in this case also causes the ice to melt.
When salt comes into contact with ice, the freezing
point of the ice is lowered. The lowering of the freezing
point depends on the amount of salt added. The more
salt added, the lower the temperature will be before the
salt- water solution freezes.7
Experiment 7:
The Chemical of Red Cabbage
Red Cabbage Jiffy Juice is an easy-to-use acid-base
indicator that measures pH. Children use Jiffy Juice to
make colorful solutions by adding common acids and
bases. It's an experiment that is safe and carefully
crafted from all food-grade material.
With this experiment children learn what is indicator,
acid and bas and they are able to find out what really
is the most acidic or basic product in our world.8
7http://www.stevespanglerscience.com/experiment/homemade-ice-cream-sick-science
8http://www.stevespanglerscience.com/product/1552
Izmir
Ankara
-
8/2/2019 Bayer Gen Bilim Elileri - Ara Rapor
16/69
BAYER YOUNG SCIENCE AMBASSADORS
15
DETERMINATION OF TOG VOLUNTEERS
The project implementing cities were determined with the assistance of TOG Field Department and in
coordination with Project Partner. Field visits were realized by the Project Coordinator together with the Field
Coordinators to volunteer groups in Istanbul, Ankara, Izmir and Kars.
SCIENTIFIC LITERACY TRAINING
Scientific Literacy Training, the main training of the Project, took place in Istanbul between Nov 30th
and
Dec 4th
2011. This is the training which the volunteers need to participate in order to gain knowledge and
skills before getting the Project started in their locality.
24 young TOG volunteers participated in the training from Istanbul, Izmir, Kars and Ankara.
The content of the training was composed of scientific literacy, working and communicating with children,
civil society in Turkey, volunteerism, meeting Project partner and the technical process of the Project.
Trainers were experts on the topics of scientific literacy, working with children, youth work and volunteerism.
-
8/2/2019 Bayer Gen Bilim Elileri - Ara Rapor
17/69
BAYER YOUNG SCIENCE AMBASSADORS
16
PRESS CONFERENCE
In order to announce the starting of the BYSA Project, Project partner Bayer Turk organized a press
conference on December 20th
2011.
Bayer Turk CEO Axel Hamann and TOG CEO Kerim Paker attended the conference and gave a speech.
Following them, Project Coordinator zge Snmez shared the aims and objectives of the BYSA Project in
details. The press conference took place in several publication organs and online media in Turkey.
-
8/2/2019 Bayer Gen Bilim Elileri - Ara Rapor
18/69
BAYER YOUNG SCIENCE AMBASSADORS
17
SCIENCE WORKSHOP
Gaziantep, a city located in the south-east of Turkey, was chosen to host TOGs 19th Youth Council. This
council was organized by Gaziantep TOG Youth Organization. From Thursday the 2nd of February until
Sunday, the 5th of February, 300 young people, chosen taking into account to the gender equality, were
reunited to celebrate this important event of the foundation.
The TOG volunteers that were selected to participate at the council were representing the 94 TOGs
University Clubs spread all around Turkey.
The second day, ten different workshops were led by the volunteers.
Young Science Ambassadors have ran a Science Workshop with 32 participants. 3 experiments were carried
out and the project was presented. Local TOG Youth groups from various cities which are interested in
implementing the BYSA project next year shared their contact information with the project coordinator.
The participants were extremely impressed by the science workshop that they were all curious about the
project for the remainder of the council.
-
8/2/2019 Bayer Gen Bilim Elileri - Ara Rapor
19/69
BAYER YOUNG SCIENCE AMBASSADORS
18
PROJECT TEAM
zge Snmez , Project Coordinator: Responsible for coordinating the whole Project team and Project
activities such as budgeting, coordinating local groups, reporting and sustainability.
Emel Uysal, Project Consultant: Responsible for the content of the Project.
Erhan Okak, Project Monitoring and Evaluating Expert: Responsible for monitoring and evaluating the
impact of the Project.
Jlide Erdoan , Head of Project Department: Responsible for supervising the Project Coordinator and
sustainability of the project.
-
8/2/2019 Bayer Gen Bilim Elileri - Ara Rapor
20/69
BAYER YOUNG SCIENCE AMBASSADORS
19
MIDTERM EVALUATION REPORT
OCTOBER 2011FEBRUARY 2012
Evaluator
Erhan Okak
Psychologist, MA
-
8/2/2019 Bayer Gen Bilim Elileri - Ara Rapor
21/69
BAYER YOUNG SCIENCE AMBASSADORS
20
Contents
Executive Summary........................................................................................................................................... 21
Abbreviations .................................................................................................................................................... 24
Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................... 25
Aims and Scope of the Project ...................................................................................................................... 25
Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) Plan and Data Collection Instruments .................................................. 26
Process Evaluation............................................................................................................................................. 27
Scientific Literacy Training (SLT) ................................................................................................................ 27Aims and Objectives .................................................................................................................................. 27
Setting and Demographics ......................................................................................................................... 28
Methodology and Assessment Tools ......................................................................................................... 29
Results ....................................................................................................................................................... 31
Conclusions and Recommendations .......................................................................................................... 36
Workshops ..................................................................................................................................................... 39
Exchange of Experiences .......................................................................................................................... 39
Field Visits and Evaluation Workshops with the Project Groups ............................................................. 43
Letters and Posters ..................................................................................................................................... 47
Conclusions and Recommendations .................................................................................................................. 52
ANNEX -1 ......................................................................................................................................................... 55
ANNEX - 2 ........................................................................................................................................................ 58
ANNEX3 ....................................................................................................................................................... 63
ANNEX4 ....................................................................................................................................................... 66
ANNEX5 ....................................................................................................................................................... 67
-
8/2/2019 Bayer Gen Bilim Elileri - Ara Rapor
22/69
BAYER YOUNG SCIENCE AMBASSADORS
21
Executive Summary
The main purpose of the midterm evaluation was to assess the effectiveness of the Bayer Young Science
Ambassadors Project (BYSAP) so far to improve the implementation of it. Both quantitative and qualitative
research methods were employed in this evaluation. An additional purpose was to present the evaluation plan
and data collection instruments.
The main objective of BYSAP is to improve the scientific literacy level of its target groups (6th, 7
thand 8
th
grade primary school students and young community volunteers ) by providing space for them to;
Get motivated to learn about and understand the nature,
Have curiosity about science and technology,
Try to understand the interrelations between science, technology, society and environment,
Get willing to question, reason and understand the happenings and facts in nature,
Question their prejudices about science and scientists,
Understand and appreciate the value of science and technology.
Two major activities were developed and implemented to reach these objectives; Scientific Literacy Training
(SLT) and Science Workshops for Children. As a result of their participation in SLT, young volunteersbecame the facilitators and implemented the workshops in four pilot cities. (Young Science Ambassadors).
Between Oct 2011 and Feb 2012,
Project team was built up by the project coordinator.Project Content was prepared and booklets for young science ambassadors and for children were written
by the project consultant.
Tools for monitoring and evaluation of the project were designed by the external expert.
24 Young TOG volunteers participated in the Scientific Literacy Training that took place in Istanbul.
24 young science ambassadors shared their knowledge and experiences with the other volunteers in their
local communities in order to expand the project team and reach more primary school children.
In total, 76 young science ambassadors reached 275 children until the end of Feb 2012.
A Press Conference was organized by Bayer Turkey with the attendance of TOG and young science
ambassadors in Dec 2012.
A Science Workshop was carried out by 8 young science ambassadors at TOG 19. Youth Council whereapproximately 300 young volunteers participated.
Field visits to local project groups were done by project team.
A Semi-structured Evaluation Meeting organized by project team with 10 young science ambassadors.
-
8/2/2019 Bayer Gen Bilim Elileri - Ara Rapor
23/69
BAYER YOUNG SCIENCE AMBASSADORS
22
A combination of different methods, including questionnaires and evaluation forms, direct field visits,
evaluation workshops and observation were used. The following is a summary of the findings and the main
conclusions by the evaluator.
24 young science ambassadors (aged between 17 - 25);
Learned about the characteristics of scientific knowledge.
Reflected on their prejudices on scientific knowledge and practice.
Got willing to question, reason and understand the happenings and facts in nature.
Experienced the activities (experiments) of the workshops they would facilitate in the primary schools.Understood the objectives of the workshop activities.
Gained knowledge about the implementation steps of the workshop activities.
Got familiar with the Facilitators Booklet they would use during the project.Learned the developmental characteristics of children,
Did case studies on communication with children and improved their communication skills
Learned children centered approach.
Got to know TOG, and its principles better than they did before.
Learned basic concepts of volunteerism and relations among them, and could debate on volunteerism being
aware of what they meant.
Children (aged between 10 - 12) who participated in the workshops;
Had fun doing experiments. (Most frequent respond).
Got excited and motivated about doing experiments and being scientists.
Showed gratitude to the facilitators for the activities and the day.
Got more curious about science and technology.
Learned something new through the workshop.
Began to like science more and to see the fun in it.
Began to imagine themselves as scientists.
Began to question the happenings and facts around them.Got willing to disseminate what they had learned.
According to the SLT and workshop results, it is clear that vast majority of project objectives were achieved
so far. However, there were opportunities to improve results. Key recommendations were as follows.
For SLT (Scientific Literacy Training)
Spending two days instead of one for experiments.
Planning 90 minutes sessions as if they take 75 minutes in order to spend more time for debriefing.
Reviewing the sessions on Communication with Children.
-
8/2/2019 Bayer Gen Bilim Elileri - Ara Rapor
24/69
BAYER YOUNG SCIENCE AMBASSADORS
23
Making agreement with the participants which creates the setting for the training at the beginning to
reduce delays in the mornings.
Reducing the lunch break to 1 hour.Sending participants some material such as a story, flyer, article, etc. to make them curious about the
training.
Providing a free afternoon in the training program.
Adding a session to the program about giving and receiving feedback.
For Workshops and Facilitation
Preparing an agreement together with children at the beginning of the workshops to ease classroom
management and encourage the children to further contribute to workshops (Agreement could be written
on a poster and signed by all the participants and facilitators).Giving more positive and clear instructions for the experiments.
Positively reinforcing childrens questions and contributions by approving them, and respondingenthusiastically.
Paying particular attention to the debriefing questions.
Using small group classroom setup for making experiments.
Having one facilitator for each small group.
Using u-shaped classroom setup for debriefing and allow more time.
Studying the Facilitators Booklet more carefully.Making preparation meetings before the workshops, sharing roles and tasks more accurately.
Making evaluation after the workshops and give feedback to each other.
Making two experiments a day instead of three or four to provide more time for communicating and
connecting with children, and debriefing.
General Recommendations
Conducting two SLTs to ensure all the young volunteers participate in the training, not %60 percent of
them, to ensure that they all have equal opportunities to develop competencies necessary for facilitating
the workshops.
Providing study visits for young volunteers to interact and learn from each other.
Organizing periodic consultation meetings to support young science ambassadors in terms of working
with children, and/or providing supervision.
Trying to understand the interrelations between science, technology, society and environment, questioningtheir own prejudices about science and scientists, and understanding and appreciating the value of science
and technology were seemed as difficult-to-reach objectives for these workshops so far, considering their
duration and context. Therefore, long term implementation (for example, a six-week program instead of
two days) was needed for such objectives to be realized.
This midterm evaluation showed that BYSAP was planned and implemented up until now, in a way that led to
(1) an increased curiosity and interest in science; scientific knowledge and practice, (2) significant change in
perception of science, scientific practice and scientists in its target groups.
-
8/2/2019 Bayer Gen Bilim Elileri - Ara Rapor
25/69
BAYER YOUNG SCIENCE AMBASSADORS
24
Abbreviations
BYSAP Bayer Young Science Ambassadors Project
SLT Scientific Literacy Training
EEF Exchange of Experiences Form
EQ1 Evaluation Questionnaire1EQ2 Evaluation Questionnaire2PLL Perceived Levels of Learning
-
8/2/2019 Bayer Gen Bilim Elileri - Ara Rapor
26/69
BAYER YOUNG SCIENCE AMBASSADORS
25
Introduction
There are two main objectives of this report. One is to present the evaluation plan in relation with the project,
particularly its aims and scope .The other is to make a process evaluation by assessing the data gathered
between October 2011 and February 2012.
Aims and Scope of the Project
The overall aim of the Bayer Young Science Ambassadors-Scientific Literacy Project (BYSAP) is;
Supporting the science education
Supporting the children and their learning process at primary schools (aged between 10-12)
by creating the scientific literacy amongst Young Community Volunteers (aged between 17-25).
Accordingly, the main objective of the project is to improve the scientific literacy level of its target groups
(6th, 7th and 8th grade primary school students and young community volunteers ) by providing space for them
to;
Get motivated to learn about and understand the nature,
Have curiosity about science and technology,
Try to understand the interrelations among science, technology, society and environment,
Get willing to question, reason and understand the happenings and facts in nature
Question their prejudices about science and scientists
Understand and appreciate the value of science and technology.
For the purpose of reaching these objectives two major interrelated activities were developed for the project.
First was the Scientific Literacy Training (SLT). This non-formal training course was designed for the young
volunteers, who came from 4 different TOG Youth Organizations, focusing on attitudes towards children,
scientific literacy, voluntary work and facilitation skills. Second were the Workshops developed to provide
children a learning environment for expressing their creativity and curiosity, gaining ability to discuss and
research by experiencing enjoyable experiments. The workshops were facilitated by the young volunteers, the
participants of SLT.
-
8/2/2019 Bayer Gen Bilim Elileri - Ara Rapor
27/69
BAYER YOUNG SCIENCE AMBASSADORS
26
In addition, the expected outcomes of the project were as follows:
A unique non-formal training module on scientific literacy (SLT)24 young community volunteers as the Science Ambassadors (SLT participants)900 scientific literate children in 4 primary schools (workshop participants)
Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) Plan and Data Collection Instruments
The evaluation plan of theBYSAP was designed to assess the objectives and the project activities mentioned
above.
The activities and the process of the BYSAP were studied focusing on two major areas and the interception of
both.
Evaluation of the Scientific Literacy Training and its effects on its participants (young
community volunteers).
Monitoring and Evaluation of the two-day workshops (basically consisting of experiments)facilitated by the SLT participants in the primary schools with children.
Observations by the evaluator during the training, preparation and evaluation meetings with the training team
and two evaluation questionnaires developed specifically for the training were the data collection instruments
for the SLT. Furthermore, three other instruments were designed in order to assess the effects of the SLTfocusing on the implementation process of the workshops. These were the field visits, semi-structured
evaluation meetings with the facilitators and Exchange of Experiences Form (EEF) (by which the facilitators
share their experiences with each other, the project coordinator and the evaluator).
Four basic instruments were designed for the assessment of the workshops and its effects on the primary
school students (aged between 10-12).
A.Monthly Activity Reports: The technical reports, including information such as the number ofthe workshops organized, number of the children participated in these workshops, number of
the facilitators, etc. and which were prepared monthly by the facilitator groups. These reports
are being collected by the project coordinator and used for the midterm report of the project.
B.Exchange of Experiences Form for the Facilitators: The forms by which the facilitators sharetheir own experience and reflections on the workshops; program, teamwork, children,
technicalities, etc. and suggestions for further workshops.
C. Posters: Posters designed by the children at the end of the first day of the workshops.D.Letters: The letters written by the children at the end of the second day of the workshops as
an answer to the theme question What kind of a scientist do I want to be?; depicting their
image of a scientist.
9
9 All of the instruments are detailed in the relevant sections of this report.
-
8/2/2019 Bayer Gen Bilim Elileri - Ara Rapor
28/69
BAYER YOUNG SCIENCE AMBASSADORS
27
Process Evaluation
In this section, results based on the data collected until this period of the project will be presented; including
the SLT evaluation, outputs of the evaluation workshops carried out with the project group in Istanbul,
preliminary analysis of the EEFs, posters and letters.
Scientific Literacy Training (SLT)
Aims and Objectives
The SLT basically aimed at enabling participants to reflect on their understanding of science, scientific
knowledge, scientific practices and to develop curiosity about science; and also developing participants
competencies necessary for facilitating the workshops they implemented during the project with children.
Therefore, the SLT was specifically designed to provide a learning environment for the participants,
To learn about the characteristics of scientific knowledge,
To reflect on their prejudices on scientific knowledge and research,To enable them to reconstruct their mental representations of scientists and scientific studies,
To get willing to question, reason and understand the happenings and facts in nature,
To experience the activities (experiments) of the workshops that they would facilitate in the primary
schools,
To understand the objectives of the workshop activities,
To gain knowledge about the implementation steps of the workshop activities,
To get familiar with the Facilitators Booklet they would use during the project,To understand the developmental characteristics of children,
To do case studies on communication with children, and improve their communication skills,
To acquire children centered approach, which promotes the right of the children to choose, make
connections and communicate; and also allows freedom for the children to think, experience, explore,question and search for answers.
In addition to the aforementioned objectives, there were two other major themes included in the training for
enabling the participants to understand the conceptual framework, and the setting voluntary work needed
during the project stands on. First was the concept of volunteerism. And the second was Community
Volunteers Foundation (TOG) itself; its aims, principles, organizational structure, activities, projects and the
opportunities it offers to young volunteers. The specific objectives related to these themes were included in
the training evaluation as well.
-
8/2/2019 Bayer Gen Bilim Elileri - Ara Rapor
29/69
BAYER YOUNG SCIENCE AMBASSADORS
28
Setting and Demographics
The Scientific Literacy Training took place on 30th
November to 4th
December 2011, in Istanbul with the
participation of 24 young volunteers from 4 different TOG Youth Organizations, training team including
project consultant, project coordinator, head of the projects department and the evaluator.
Representatives of Bayer Turkey visited the training to give information about Bayer, particularly its
corporate social responsibility strategy and explain where the BYSAP stands in this strategy. They also shared
their expectations from the project and the young volunteers.
The training is developed and implemented by 5 trainers who are experienced in volunteering, civil society,
human rights, cohabitation, scientific literacy, working with children, non-formal training and
experiential learning methodology. Three preparatory meetings were held prior to the training by the training
team.
The evaluator participated in the preparatory meetings to observe and work with the training team for the
specific objectives of the training and the sessions. He also fully participated in the training to make
observations, to apply the evaluation forms, to facilitate the Evaluation Session at the end of the program andto take part in the daily and final evaluation meetings with the training team.
24 young volunteers participated in the training of which 54% were women and 46% were men. The mean age
of the participants was 21,50 2,12. The youngest participant was 18 years old, and the oldest was 25 years
old.
None of the participants had Scientific Literacy training before but 35% of them reported that they had
training with the theme Working with Children before this training.
The participants reported 19 different fields of study as their majors and only 21% of them were majored in
natural sciences.
-
8/2/2019 Bayer Gen Bilim Elileri - Ara Rapor
30/69
BAYER YOUNG SCIENCE AMBASSADORS
29
Methodology and Assessment Tools
The evaluator got involved at every stage of the training process, from the beginning (program design) to the
end (post-training evaluation meeting), to make a versatile and meaningful assessment. A variety of data
collection methods (quantitative and qualitative) were used in order to minimize the weakness of any single
approach. With this intention, both the data gathered from the participants and feedback from the trainers had
been used for assessment.
The evaluation plan for the training involves the assessment of the significant changes in participants in termsof knowledge, skills and opinions specific to the training objectives, observation of the sessions and
participant observations of the evaluation meetings the trainers held at the end of each day (see Figure1).
Figure1: Evaluation Plan for SLT
Program
Design
Daily evaluationmeetings (with
trainers)
Day 3Day 1
End of the
training
Daily evaluationsessions (withparticipants)Pre-test
Post-test
Day 5Day 4Day 2
Day 6
Final Evaluation
Meeting (with
trainers,coordinatar and
consultantBeginning of the
training
EVALUATION PLAN
-
8/2/2019 Bayer Gen Bilim Elileri - Ara Rapor
31/69
BAYER YOUNG SCIENCE AMBASSADORS
30
Evaluation Questionnaire1: The SLT Evaluation Questionnaire1 (EQ1, see Annex -1) was developedto measure changes in knowledge, skills and opinions of the participants quantitatively, by the evaluator with
the contribution of the training team. The EQ1 had 56 items based on the specific objectives of the training
sessions. The participants were required to respond to the items on a ten point Likert scale from Dont know
at all/Cant do at all/Strongly disagree to Know completely/Can do completely/Strongly agree (see Annex
1). The questionnaire was applied twice, once at the beginning and once at the end of the training as pre-
test and post-test. Participants were asked to fill in the column A during pre -test and columns B and C
during post-test (representing pre-test, post-test and revised pre-test scores, respectively). For the column C
participants reassessed their pre-test scores after the training.
Evaluation Questionnaire2: The SLT Evaluation Questionnaire 2 (EQ2, see Annex - 2) was basically a
reactionnaire form which was developed to get feedback from the participants about overall structure and
themes covered in the training, the trainers, technical conditions, etc. It also included a few open ended
questions related with the aims of the training and some Likert scale items which could only be assessed after
the training. Besides providing qualitative data for the evaluator EQ 2 served the team of trainers during the
final evaluation meeting as a tool for evaluating the training.
Daily Evaluation Sessions (with participants): These were the sessions where the participants shared their
experiences about the program, expressed their feelings, heard how others had experienced that same part of
the program and came up with suggestions and ideas to improve the program. These sessions also providedthe team of trainers an effective means for staying in touch with the way the group of participants developed
and identifying any problems and challenges that needed intervention.
Daily Evaluation Meetings (with trainers): The meetings trainers held at the end of each day where they
evaluated the sessions, participants reactions, the training team and make modifications on the program if
necessary. The evaluator participated in these meetings mostly as an observer and made suggestions if needed.
Final Evaluation Meeting (with trainers, coordinator and consultant): Meeting held with the participation of
trainers, coordinator, consultant and evaluator shortly after the training where overall structure and elements
of the training program were evaluated and necessary future modifications were discussed.
-
8/2/2019 Bayer Gen Bilim Elileri - Ara Rapor
32/69
BAYER YOUNG SCIENCE AMBASSADORS
31
Results
In this section, findings derived from the EQ -1 and EQ 2 will be presented, respectively (4 of the
participants EQ-1 were excluded since they were not completed as needed).
In Graphic1 pre-test (A), post-test (B) and revised pre-test (C) scores of the participants were presented.
One-way Repeated Measures ANOVA was conducted to compare the A, B, C scores. The results indicated
that there was a statistically significant difference across these three scores. Wilks Lambda = .23, F(2,18), p
< .001. The means and standard deviations were presented in Table 1. In other words, generally speaking,
the training had the desired effect on the participants in terms of its objectives.
Graphic1: EQ-1 mean scores for participants
In addition, in Graphic2, mean scores for each item were demonstrated. Although differences between pre-
test and revised pre-test mean scores could be noticed these differences are not statistically significant as seen
in Table - 2.
Graphic2: Mean scores for EQ1 items
-
8/2/2019 Bayer Gen Bilim Elileri - Ara Rapor
33/69
BAYER YOUNG SCIENCE AMBASSADORS
32
Table1: Descriptive Statistics for Pre-test, Post-test and Revised Pre-test Scores
Mean Std. Deviation N
Pre-test 7,50 ,748 20
Post-test 8,64 ,399 20
Revised Pre-test 6,98 1,46 20
Moreover, whileBonferroni Post Hoc Testrevealed that post-test was statistically significantly different form
post-test and revised pre-test there was no significant difference between pre-test and revised pre-test. The
results were shown in Table2.
Table2: Descriptive Statistics for Pre-test, Post-test and Revised Pre-test Scores
(I) factor1 (J)
factor1
Mean
Difference
(I-J)
Std. Error Sig.a 95% Confidence
Interval for Differencea
Lower
Bound
Upper
Bound
Pre-test Post-test -1,142* ,151 ,000 -1,539 -,745
R.pre-test ,512 ,311 ,348 -,304 1,329
Post-test Pre-test 1,142* ,151 ,000 ,745 1,539
R.pre-test 1,654* ,334 ,000 ,777 2,532
R.pre-test Pre-test -,512 ,311 ,348 -1,329 ,304
Post-test -1,654* ,334 ,000 -2,532 -,777
Based on estimated marginal means
*. The mean difference is significant at the ,05 level.
a. Adjustment for multiple comparisons: Bonferroni.
R.pre-test: Revised pre-test
Given that there was no significant difference between pre-test and revised pre-test scores, in the following
phase of analysis Wilcoxon Matched Pairs Signed Ranks Testwas conducted to assess the difference between
revised pre-test and post-test scores, for each item of EQ-1. The results were shown in Table3 below.
-
8/2/2019 Bayer Gen Bilim Elileri - Ara Rapor
34/69
BAYER YOUNG SCIENCE AMBASSADORS
33
Table3: Mean scores for revised pre-test and post-test, and p values for Wilcoxon tests, EQ-1
No Items r. Pre-test post-test p values
1 All individuals aged between 0-18 are children. 6,25 7,90 ,115
2* I know the aims of TOG. 7,55 9,55 ,002
3* Volunteerism has diverse definitions. 7,35 9,70 ,006
4* I know what "rights based work" with children means. 5,10 8,75 ,000
5* I know how to express what I mean to a child. 6,20 8,75 ,001
6 Scientific methods provide absolute proofs. 4,95 4,75 ,670
7* I know the mechanisms for participating in decision making processes in TOG. 6,25 8,35 ,005
8* Volunteerism is a way of civic participation. 7,80 9,25 ,009
9* I know the developmental characteristics of children aged between 7-14. 6,25 8,85 ,002
10 The child is an individual with rights. 9,30 9,50 ,786
11* I know the essential values of working with children. 6,95 9,25 ,002
12 Only highly educated scientists understand science. 7,95 8,50 ,570
13* I can focus children's attention to a specific issue during the workshops. 6,30 8,95 ,001
14* I know how TOG functions. 7,26 9,65 ,003
15* I know the difference among volunteerism, helpfulness and charity. 7,30 9,45 ,001
16* It can be fun to work in a science lab. 7,20 9,25 ,007
17* I can manage an approach appropriate to the children's developmental characteristics. 6,95 9,25 ,000
18* While facilitating a workshop with children process is more important than the product. 7,11 9,32 ,005
19* I know the principles of TOG. 7,50 9,70 ,005
20* I may not make big discoveries but studying science can be fun. 7,35 9,55 ,003
21 There is no imagination in science. 6,65 7,30 ,501
22 I can inform people about TOG's aims. 7,90 9,20 ,049
23* I know what active participation means. 7,75 9,45 ,002
24 Every child is different than the other. 9,15 9,85 ,066
25 Scientific methods can answer all the questions. 5,50 6,20 ,132
26* A child is an individual, for whom an environment which allows his/her active participation
must be created.
8,25 9,70 ,007
27* I can think of myself in children's state and conditions while working with them. 8,10 9,55 ,003
28* I can specify the source of a problem during the workshops. 6,10 8,80 ,001
29* I know what kind of opportunities TOG provides for young people (e.g. scholarships, 7,00 9,55 ,002
30* I can debate on volunteerism being aware of what I mean. 7,70 9,45 ,004
31* Every single child develops with his/her distinctive developmental phase. 8,15 9,80 ,008
32* Electronic devices are indeed the examples of valuable products of science 4,40 2,90 ,005
33* I know what children centered approach refers to. 6,05 9,05 ,000
34* Most people can understand science. 6,25 8,30 ,001
35* I know about the activities of TOG. 7,75 9,70 ,002
36* I can create an environment which suits the needs of children I work with. 6,40 9,25 ,000
37* I know what may cause communication failures while working with children. 6,45 9,35 ,000
38 Scientists do not have enough time for their families or for fun. 7,50 7,00 ,47639* I can inform people about how TOG functions. 7,65 9,80 ,001
40* I can solve a presenting problem while working with children. 6,55 8,80 ,001
41 Scientific knowledge includes subjectivity. 3,80 5,35 ,054
42* I can inform people about the principles of TOG. 7,05 9,30 ,001
43* I know the impact of active participation. 7,60 9,65 ,003
44 All children have equal opportunity to participate in the workshops and no discrimination is 9,15 9,90 ,068
45 Scientific study is boring. 8,70 8,95 ,611
46 There is no cultural diversity in scientific knowledge. 4,45 4,65 ,937
47 Each child has different abilities and aptitudes. 9,45 9,95 ,180
48* I know how to act if any problem occurs during the workshops with children. 6,15 9,10 ,000
49 It might be very difficult for me to do scientific studies. 6,85 6,85 ,943
50* I can inform people about TOG's activities. 7,80 9,65 ,001
51* I can create an environment in which the children can easily share their thoughts and feelings. 6,50 9,20 ,00052* Imagination and creativity are important in the formation of scientific knowledge. 7,68 9,53 ,008
53* Each child has a unique way of expressing him/herself. 8,15 9,45 ,028
-
8/2/2019 Bayer Gen Bilim Elileri - Ara Rapor
35/69
BAYER YOUNG SCIENCE AMBASSADORS
34
54* I know which precautions to I can take for an adverse situation not to occur while facilitating the 6,35 9,05 ,001
55 Scientists have to work very hard. 4,65 4,30 ,528
56* I have the skills necessary for facilitating the workshops. 6,65 9,25 ,000*The mean difference is significant at the 0,05 level
The Wilcoxon Test revealed statistically significant increase in post-test scores except items 1, 6, 10, 12, 21,
22, 24, 25, 38, 44, 45, 46, 47, 49 and 55 (red-painted items) . Difference in item 41 was almost significant.
These results will be discussed in the next section.
In Graphics 3 and 4 participants Perceived Levels of Learning (PLL) were presented. In the EQ-2, the
participants were required to asses to what extent they thought they had learned from each session of the
training course on a five point Likert scale from Learned nothing to Learned a lot. Perceived Levels of
Learning refers to the mean scores of these self-assessments.
Graphic3: Participants Perceived Levels of Learning
The overall PLL mean score was 4,55 out of 5. Minimum score was 3,71 and maximum score was 4,96. These
results clearly indicated that the participants thought that they had learned a lot in the training.
Graphic - 4: Perceived Levels of Learning for Sessions
-
8/2/2019 Bayer Gen Bilim Elileri - Ara Rapor
36/69
BAYER YOUNG SCIENCE AMBASSADORS
35
Minimum PLL mean for sessions was 4,04 (Child and Child Development) and maximum mean was 4,96(Colors Dancing in the Milk experiment).
Mean scores for the technical conditions of the training according to the participants were as follows
Graphic - 5: Technical Conditions
Participants overall mean score for technical conditions is 4,33. This score indicated that, in the eyes of theparticipants; the technical conditions were quite well except for meals.
In Graphic6, the mean scores for the items that could not be assessed prior to the training were presented.
These items were used additionally to assess to what extent the participants thought they could facilitate the
workshops with children.
Graphic - 6: Mean Scores for the Post-Training Items
-
8/2/2019 Bayer Gen Bilim Elileri - Ara Rapor
37/69
BAYER YOUNG SCIENCE AMBASSADORS
36
Conclusions and Recommendations
There were three main objectives of the Scientific Literacy Training. First was enabling participants to reflect
on their understanding of science, scientific knowledge, scientific practices and to develop curiosity about
science. The other two, both acquisition of children centered approach and experiencing the experiments and
their implementation procedures, were about developing participants competencies necessary for facilitating
the workshops they would implement with children during the project.
The results presented in the previous section indicated that the training had reached its overall objectives. In
addition, evaluating the specific learning objectives of training in detail provided opportunities both to
understand the extent to which the training created a change in participants in terms of its expected outcomes
and make suggestions for the following SLTs.
In line with the objectives, the training had three main themes, namely Scientific Literacy, Working with
Children and Experiments. Communication with Children, Who is the Child? and Rights Based
Approach were the subthemes of Working with Children. Volunteerism, TOG and its principles were
additional training themes. Discussions of the objectives were categorized under these headings.
All the items under Communication with Children showed statistically significant difference (see Table 3above). Half of the items under Rights Based Approach and Who is the Child? showed no significance (5
items out of 11). However, 4 of these statistically insignificant items had very high levels of pre-test scores
(e.g. 9,30/10). These results suggested that participants had gained knowledge, acquired skills and attitudes
necessary for working with children. In other words, participants;
- understood the developmental characteristics of children more,- did case studies on communication with children and improved their communication skills,-
acquired basics of children centered approach, which promotes the right of the children to choose, makeconnections and communicate; and also allows freedom for the children to think, experience, explore,
question and search for answers.
Nevertheless our observations on the field and the outputs of EEFs and Evaluation Workshops suggested that
facilitators needed more support in communicating with children and classroom management, especially in
cases of conflicts.
Again, all three items under Workshop Activities (Experiments) were found statistically significant.
Moreover, items in the EQ2 related with the experiments and facilitation of them (see Graphic 6, page 8)
were scored quite high. This indicated that participants learned the objectives and implementation phases of
experiments sufficiently. Notwithstanding, field observations revealed that participants needed to further read
and study the Facilitators Book.
-
8/2/2019 Bayer Gen Bilim Elileri - Ara Rapor
38/69
BAYER YOUNG SCIENCE AMBASSADORS
37
3 out of 15 Scientific Literacy items showed statistically significant difference. Participants began to think thatscience could be understood by everyone not just by scientists. Moreover, they began to see science as more
enjoyable and fun than they did before training. Their opinions such as Scientific methods provide absolute
proofs," Scientific methods can answer all the questions," There is no cultural diversity in scientific
knowledge," Scientists have to work very hard," It might be very difficult for me to do scientific studies
remained the same after the training. Furthermore, their ideas about the place and function of imagination in
science were controversial. On one hand, they began to think that imagination and creativity were important in
the formation of scientific knowledge and on the other hand no significant change was observed on the idea
that there was no place for imagination in science.
These results contradicted with the results of EQ 2. Participants were required to share the skills they
acquired and opinions that changed during the training in the EQ - 2. Their responses were presented below,
from most frequent to least.
Skills
How to approach to children
Communication
Being patient
ObservationModerating experiments
Versatile thinking
Opinions and attitudes
I will observe and examine the things around me more.
Teamwork increases efficiency.
I broke my prejudices against natural sciences.
There is nothing to be afraid of science.
I can be a scientist.Everyone can do science.
My belief that science is absolute has changed.
There is subjectivity in science
Opinions that changed with the effect of the training provided evidence for the improvement of participants
view of science.
All but one of the items under Volunteerism, TOG and its principles were found statistically significantly
different. This suggested that participants knew TOG and its principles better than they did before, learnedbasic concepts of volunteerism and relations among them, and could debate on volunteerism being aware of
what they meant.
-
8/2/2019 Bayer Gen Bilim Elileri - Ara Rapor
39/69
BAYER YOUNG SCIENCE AMBASSADORS
38
We looked at the answers of the participants to the open-ended questions in the EQ -2 and outputs of theevaluation meeting held with trainers, project coordinator and consultant at the end of the training to evaluate
the training process.
Participants were satisfied with the technical conditions except for the meals (Graphic 5). The training hall
not having windows wasparticipants only negative feedback about technical conditions.
The participants reported that the structure of the training was well-prepared and also flexible to the needs of
the participants and their learning process. The best feature of the programs overall structure was the sessions
being concordant and complementary with each other. Every session was linked with prior and followingsessions. Participants reported that not only they didnt get bored but had fun during the training. At the same
time, they thought that it was an intensive program, and they got tired occasionally. Few participants
suggested to increase duration of the training and not to make sessions after dinner. They also asked for more
sessions on approach to and communication with children, and more time to explore Istanbul.
Very good, well up in their subject, well-prepared, coherent with each other, sincere, supportive, patient,understanding and attentive were the adjectives and expressions that participants used as they evaluated the
trainers.
Participants were asked whether they felt like being a facilitator in the project at the end of the training.
21 of 24 participants responded as Yes. 3 of them responded Yes, but I need support. This indicated that
they were confident enough to facilitate the workshops.
The most frequent post-training expectation of the participants was staying in touch and sharing experiences.
Peer support, technical and moral support from the coordinator, support for improving communication with
children and wish to disseminate the project were other expectations. These sort of expectations showed that
participants were highly motivated at the end of the training.
Additionally, visit of Bayer Turks representatives increased participants mo tivation, and their faith in the
success of the project.
Following topics and recommendations came to the fore in the post-training evaluation meeting with the
training team. These outcomes would be meaningful to consider when designing the next SLT.
-
Spending two days instead of one for experiments.- Planning 90 minutes sessions as if they take 75 minutes in order to spend more time for debriefing.- Reviewing the sessions titled Communication with Children.
-
8/2/2019 Bayer Gen Bilim Elileri - Ara Rapor
40/69
BAYER YOUNG SCIENCE AMBASSADORS
39
- Making agreement with the participants which creates the setting for the training at the beginning toreduce delays in the mornings.
- Reducing the lunch break to 1 hour.- Sending participants some material such as a story, flyer, article, etc. to make them curious about the
training.
- Providing a free afternoon for participants.- Adding a session to the program about giving and receiving feedback.- Having all the young volunteers participate in the training, not %60 percent of them.
Summing up, results of both EQ 1 and EQ - 2 confirmed that the training served its purposes. However, it
would be useful to revise and restructure the sessions on Communicating with Children and Scientific
Literacy for strengthening the impact of the training
Workshops
Between September 2011 and February 2012, 76 young volunteers and 275 children joined the project in four
cities; Istanbul, Izmir, Ankara and Kars (see BYSAP Midterm Report for further information). Since obtaining
the legal permissions from Directorates of Education took distict durations in each city, each project group
started implementing the workshops at different times.
Four data collection instruments were developed to conduct process evaluation of the project. Exchange of
Experiences Form (EEF), Field Visits - Evaluation Workshops, Posters children made and Letters children
wrote. EEFs and Field Visits Evaluation Workshops also provided additional qualitative data for the
assessment of Scientific Literacy Training (SLT).
Exchange of Experiences
As the project was implemented by four different youth organizations (project teams) in four cities it was
important for the facilitators to be in contact and share their experiences. This was also the facilitators
expectation at the end of SLT. Apart from the e-mail and Facebook groups, where the facilitators exchanged
information, pictures, and videos of ongoing activities and related material, Exchange of Experiences Form
(EEF) was developed as a more structured way of exchanging information among the project groups and
facilitators (see Annex3). The other equally important function of EEFs was to provide qualitative data for
process evaluation.
-
8/2/2019 Bayer Gen Bilim Elileri - Ara Rapor
41/69
BAYER YOUNG SCIENCE AMBASSADORS
40
By filling out these forms, the facilitators shared their own experience and reflections on the workshops,
concentrating on their personal experience, program, teamwork, children, school officials, technical
conditions, workshop objectives and suggestions for further workshops.
A summary of data from 12 EEFs was presented below.
Personal Experience
Facilitators felt anxious before their initial workshops. Their level of this kind of performance anxiety was
quite natural and tended to decrease as they participated in more than one workshop.
Teamwork
Facilitators reported an overall satisfaction about the teamwork during the project. The most compelling
evidence was the task-sharing. In most of the workshops they shared their roles and tasks by taking personal
choices into consideration. Frequently, they assisted each other and felt as a team as a consequence during the
workshops. In some few cases, especially when there were only one member who participated in the SLT and
no preparation meeting was held, facilitators had difficulty in working as a team.
Furthermore, as the facilitators got more experienced, felt less anxious and took enough time for proper
preparation they shared their tasks in a more detailed and structured way, determining sub-categories for the
tasks (such as preparation of materials, moderation of experiments, paying attention to childrens needs and
classroom management ) and began to learn from each other
Program
They could do all of the experiments and all worked well unless they had difficulty in finding some materials
such as white carnation, hot water, ice, etc. According to the facilitators, icebreakers, energizers and games
used during the workshops played an important role in motivating and ensuring the children participate in the
workshop
Homemade Ice Cream and Colors Dancing in the Milk were facilitators most favorite experiments.
-
8/2/2019 Bayer Gen Bilim Elileri - Ara Rapor
42/69
BAYER YOUNG SCIENCE AMBASSADORS
41
Children (their contribution, motivation, interest, group dynamic, observed improvements)
First of all, facilitators stated that children were quite exited, motivated and active during the workshops. They
liked the experiments and enjoyed the workshops. Secondly, facilitators observed that children were really
appreciative of their efforts if they cared enough and valued them. Most of the time they wanted to participate
again the week after.
Moreover, children responded well when facilitators encouraged children to cooperate as they tended to work
individually.
On the other hand, some facilitators felt helpless when children who had previous experience with some
particular experiments got bored and distracted against all their efforts.
School Officials
Principles and/or teachers were very helpful and supportive according to facilitators. They felt really
welcomed. They had no unpleasant interactions with the officials. On only one occasion a teacher came in to
see what was happening and gave instructions to children, which was stated as intrusive by facilitators.
Technical Conditions
Facilitators thought all the technical conditions were fine except some complaints about the classroom being
cold.
In one of the schools, the school lab was used for the first time. Facilitators felt happy to contribute to labs
functioning. However, the setup of the lab was not suitable for small groups work.
-
8/2/2019 Bayer Gen Bilim Elileri - Ara Rapor
43/69
BAYER YOUNG SCIENCE AMBASSADORS
42
Evaluation of the workshops
Facilitators were asked to evaluate the workshop based on its objectives (Do you think the workshop enabledchildren (1) to have an opinion about the nature of science, (2) to get more curious about science, (3) to get
more willing to learn, question and reason?). They responses could be categorized under three headings;
curiosity, changes in perception of science and increased interest in science. Some of the responses
were quoted below.
Yes, it really gets the children excited and motivated about science. They began to ask why and how
questions.
They ask questions and comment on the experiments.
Their interest in science increases especially when we use examples from daily life during the discussions.
I think the children will share what we did here when they get home.
They said that they would use the booklets and do the experiments at home.
The children who participated earlier workshops had told their friends about the experiments and they got
interested and wondered about the experiments.
I think they like science more than before.
They saw that science was more fun than they thought it was.
They realized that doing experiments and science was not that hard.
Suggestions for Following Workshops
When asked to make suggestions for the following workshops facilitators gave the following answers.
It really gets exhausting at the end of the day, especially if the number of participants is high. Therefore, pay
attention to number of the participants.
Talk with the principal about number of the participants and parental permission letters.
Parents who wish to participate in the workshop cause distraction for both the group and their own children.
Find an appropriate way to keep them out of the classroom.
Some of the children found some experiments simple, such as Do flowers drink water? and got distracted.
More complicated, alternative experiments may be added to the workshop program.
Book, TV shows and movie suggestions can be made for children.
(See the section below for recommendations built up in the evaluation workshop for improving theimplementation process).
-
8/2/2019 Bayer Gen Bilim Elileri - Ara Rapor
44/69
BAYER YOUNG SCIENCE AMBASSADORS
43
Field Visits and Evaluation Workshops with the Project Groups
Two field visits were implemented by the project coordinator, project consultant and the evaluator in two
primary schools, in Istanbul to make observations and collect data which was essential for the evaluation
workshop. Observations were held under the headings Practice/Process, Content of the workshops and
Communication with Children.
With the data gathered with these field visits it became possible to monitor the ongoing implementation
process, improve some of the practices and build up practical recommendations for the facilitators.
With those in hand, a semi-structured evaluation workshop was held with the participation of 10 volunteers
from Istanbul project team, project coordinator, consultant and evaluator for the purpose of;
Providing a space for the facilitators to share their experiences with each other and reflect on their work,
Emphasizing the positive aspects of their works and hereby increasing the motivation of facilitators,
Identifying areas for improvement and
Collecting data for process evaluation.
In the evaluation workshop the participants were asked to reflect, brainstorm and write down on posters,
what went good and what went bad during the workshops focusing on teamwork, program and
experiments, relations with the school officials, children, classroom management/communication with
children and technical conditions; working in small groups. The outputs were summarized below combined
with our observations.
Teamwork
(+)
Task-sharing - they are generally satisfied with the way they shared their tasks for the workshops
Having a preparation meeting before the workshop day
Making evaluation after the workshop
-
8/2/2019 Bayer Gen Bilim Elileri - Ara Rapor
45/69
BAYER YOUNG SCIENCE AMBASSADORS
44
(-)
Difference between the facilitators who participated in the SLT and who didnt. Facilitators who participatedin the SLT were expected to take more responsibility and guide other team members.
The facilitators felt that the teamwork they had was satisfying and functional for the overall course of the
workshops. Consistently, our observations suggests that in so far as the facilitators had a preparation meeting,
shared their tasks before the workshop day and study the Facilitators Booklet they felt more confident and
competent during the workshops.
Program and experiments
(+)
Energizers and games performed between the experiments really helped the children to get together and get
motivated.
Facilitators had the chance to perform all the experiments in the program.
(-)
Experiment materials that could not be found, such as ice, hot water, carnation, caused some trouble in the
sequence of the program.
The carnations are hard to find and expensive.
Difficulty in having the children to solve the puzzle in the program.
Difficulty in answering some of the childrens questions related to the content of the experiments.
Sometimes it really got exhausting towards the end of the day since they tried to do all the experiments in the
program.
Observations during the field visits revealed that the facilitators focused on the execution of the experiments
and classroom management more than the debriefing sections where they were required to create a discussion,
and encourage the children to ask questions and reflect on the related concepts and themes.
-
8/2/2019 Bayer Gen Bilim Elileri - Ara Rapor
46/69
BAYER YOUNG SCIENCE AMBASSADORS
45
Relations with the school officials
Both project groups reported that the school officials showed great interest in the project, they were helpful
most of the time and happy that the workshops took place in their schools.
Children
(+)
Interested in the project, motivated to do experiments, curious, creative
Sincere, respectful and happy to join the workshop
(-)
Had difficulty in teamwork; cooperate and tended to participate individually (selfishness, jealousy, fighting).
Their wish to participate in the workshop again caused some trouble (Facilitators had a conflict between not
turning down the previous participants and having new children to participate).
Classroom management/communication with children
Observations indicated that facilitators used the words and phrases such as we, friends, together as they
spoke to children during the workshops which where the indicators of an inclusive and child centered
approach. Although they tended to lose their temper and raise their voice to draw attention when they got too
exhausted because of the noise children created they were aware of this behavior most of the time and try to
readjust the way they communicated.
They also tried to include all of the children in the course even if the children wanted to behave individually
and not cooperate or tended stay out of the team.
In line with what was observed, facilitators reported that they had some troubles when the children inclined to
quarrel, fight or get distracted. This occurred especially with u-shaped classroom setup. Classroom setup
adjusted in groups of 4-5 tables as suggested in the Facilitators Booklet allowed easier cooperative learning
for the children.
-
8/2/2019 Bayer Gen Bilim Elileri - Ara Rapor
47/69
BAYER YOUNG SCIENCE AMBASSADORS
46
Areas for improvement and Recommendations
In the light of observations during the field visits and outputs of evaluation workshop, participants, including
project coordinator, consultant and evaluator, identified areas for improvement and built up recommendations
for the next phase of the project. Those were as follows:
i. Preparing an agreement together with children at the beginning of the workshops to ease classroom
management and encourage the children to participate in workshops more (Agreement could be written on a
poster and signed by all the participants and facilitators).
ii. Giving more positive and clear instructions for the experiments
iii. Positively reinforcing childrens questions and contributions by approving them and respondingenthusiastically.
iv. Paying particular attention to the debriefing questions.
v. Using small group classroom setup for making experiments.
vi. Having one facilitator for each small group.
vii. Using u-shaped classroom setup and allow more time for debriefing.
viii. Studying the Facilitators Booklet more carefully.
ix. Making preparation meetings before the workshops, share roles and tasks more accurately.
x. Making evaluation after the workshops and give feedback to each other.
xi. Making two experiments a day instead of three or four to provide more time for communicating and
connecting with children, and debriefing.
In addition, verbal feedback of the facilitators and our observations suggested that weekends were more
appropriate for the workshops since the schools are more silent and calmer than the weekdays. It provided
more space and concentration both for the facilitators and the children.
-
8/2/2019 Bayer Gen Bilim Elileri - Ara Rapor
48/69
BAYER YOUNG SCIENCE AMBASSADORS
47
Letters and Posters
Letters and Posters were the two instruments developed to collect data from the participants of workshops; the
children.
At the end of the first day of the workshops, children were instructed by the facilitators to prepare a poster in
small groups and then present it to other participants as a team (see Annex 4 for an example). The purpose
of the posters was twofold. First, it provided a tool for children to recall experiences they had during the day
and share them with each other. Second, it provided qualitative data for evaluation, which supports the data
collected by the letters.
Some examples of childrens statements were presented below.
It was a very nice and funny day. We did experiments, played games and became scientists here.
I cant wait to come tomorrow.
I thank to our entire elder sisters and brothers for coming here and helping us.
All of us are scientists. We are young scientists.
Science is great., Science is fun.
I like science a lot; we learned a lot of things today.
Science is a part of someones life.
Science is making new contributions to the world.
Science is discovering new things.
Science is inventing new things that people can use.
In addition to the aforementioned purposes of the posters it was observed that preparing and presenting
posters in small groups helped children to experience more cooperation and team work.
The main question asked with the letter was What kind of a scientist do you want to be?. Children were
required to write a letter which described the kind of scientist they would like to be, what they would want to
do and search as a scientist and why they chose those subjects (see Annex5 for an example).
-
8/2/2019 Bayer Gen Bilim Elileri - Ara Rapor
49/69
BAYER YOUNG SCIENCE AMBASSADORS
48
71 letters were gathered so far from 4th
and 5th
grade students. 35 of them were selected randomly for analysis.
Childrens responses were gathered under 13 categories based on the objectives of the workshops. Some of
the categories were predefined and some emerged through the an