Facilities and Enrollment Task Force
Modular Removal PlanningMonday, February 4, 2013
Overview
• Outcomes from last meeting• Why is modular removal a viable option?• Proposed timeline of the 3-year modular
removal• Modular location examination:
o Required program movement and new locationso Removal costo Utilities / Maintenance savings
Outcomes from Last Meeting
• Reviewed updated NESDEC enrollment projections for next 10 years
• Compared number of classrooms to be needed in each building with the number of classrooms available with modulars removed
• Reviewed estimated costs of modular removal along with estimated utility and maintenance savings
• Request development of a plan for phased removal showing impact on program delivery
Why Modular Removal?
• Modular space meant to be temporary• Utility cost and maintenance savings• Avoid capital expenditures for modulars• Maintenance of K-6 programs and community-based
schools• Capacity of schools more aligned with enrollment
projections
Proposed TimelineModular Location Recommended Removal Date
Tootin’ Hills Summer 2013
Latimer Lane – White modular Summer 2013
Central School Summer 2014*
Latimer Lane Summer 2015*
* Reviewed on an annual basis based upon enrollments
Tootin’ Hills Relocation
Tootin’ Hills School 2013-14
Squadron Line School 2013-14
Tootin’ Hills SchoolAssociated Costs and Savings
Latimer Lane White Modular: Summer 2013
Latimer Lane School White ModularAssociated Costs/Savings
Central School Relocation:Summer 2014
Central SchoolAssociated Costs and Savings
Latimer Lane: Summer 2015
Latimer Lane SchoolAssociated Costs/Savings
Additional Considerations
• Long term planning to centralize Pre-School• Room readiness costs for program relocation• More appropriate program space• Purchase/reuse of modulars• Developing communications plan based upon
Task Force feedback
Next Steps
