Facilities and Enrollment Task Force

Modular Removal PlanningMonday, February 4, 2013

Overview

• Outcomes from last meeting• Why is modular removal a viable option?• Proposed timeline of the 3-year modular

removal• Modular location examination:

o Required program movement and new locationso Removal costo Utilities / Maintenance savings

Outcomes from Last Meeting

• Reviewed updated NESDEC enrollment projections for next 10 years

• Compared number of classrooms to be needed in each building with the number of classrooms available with modulars removed

• Reviewed estimated costs of modular removal along with estimated utility and maintenance savings

• Request development of a plan for phased removal showing impact on program delivery

Why Modular Removal?

• Modular space meant to be temporary• Utility cost and maintenance savings• Avoid capital expenditures for modulars• Maintenance of K-6 programs and community-based

schools• Capacity of schools more aligned with enrollment

projections

Proposed TimelineModular Location Recommended Removal Date

Tootin’ Hills Summer 2013

Latimer Lane – White modular Summer 2013

Central School Summer 2014*

Latimer Lane Summer 2015*

* Reviewed on an annual basis based upon enrollments

Tootin’ Hills Relocation

Tootin’ Hills School 2013-14

Squadron Line School 2013-14

Tootin’ Hills SchoolAssociated Costs and Savings

Latimer Lane White Modular: Summer 2013

Latimer Lane School White ModularAssociated Costs/Savings

Central School Relocation:Summer 2014

Central SchoolAssociated Costs and Savings

Latimer Lane: Summer 2015

Latimer Lane SchoolAssociated Costs/Savings

Additional Considerations

• Long term planning to centralize Pre-School• Room readiness costs for program relocation• More appropriate program space• Purchase/reuse of modulars• Developing communications plan based upon

Task Force feedback

Next Steps