Download - MELJUN CORTES ACCORD Presentation Meljun
-
8/20/2019 MELJUN CORTES ACCORD Presentation Meljun
1/27
Washington Accord Graduate Attributes:A Metric for the Quality of Engineering
Education Worldwide
MELJUN CORTES MBA MPA MSCS
13 August 2006 1
MELJUN CORTES
MBA MPA MSCS
-
8/20/2019 MELJUN CORTES ACCORD Presentation Meljun
2/27
• The author has no formal connection with theInternational Engineering Alliance or theWashington Accord.
• The views expressed in this presentation arethose of the author based on 17 years ofexperience gained on accreditation visits inCanada, Costa Rica, India, Korea, and theUnited States.
• The author has been a member of the CanadianEngineering Accreditation Board for 11 years andwas Chair from 2012-2014.
Disclaimer:
13 August 2006 2
-
8/20/2019 MELJUN CORTES ACCORD Presentation Meljun
3/27
Outline
• Purpose
• WA Background
• WA Graduate Attribute exemplar
– Knowledge Base – Complex Problems
• Role of the GA exemplar
– Not a standard but a metric
• Using the exemplar as a metric
• What can we learn from applying a metric?
313 August 2006
-
8/20/2019 MELJUN CORTES ACCORD Presentation Meljun
4/27
• The purpose of this presentation is to discussthe concept of worldwide standards for qualityof undergraduate engineering programs
• The purpose of accreditation is to serve thepublic and the profession by continuallyimproving the quality of engineering
education and engineering practice
Purpose
13 August 2006 4
-
8/20/2019 MELJUN CORTES ACCORD Presentation Meljun
5/27
• The Washington Accord (WA) is an international mutualrecognition agreement (MRA) that has been in place for morethan 25 years and now has 17 signatories and 5 provisionalmembers.
WA Background
13 August 2006 5
-
8/20/2019 MELJUN CORTES ACCORD Presentation Meljun
6/27
Principles of the MRA
• Accreditation criteria, policies and procedures ofthe signatories have been verified and judgedcomparable (“substantially equivalent”)
• Accreditation decisions made by one signatoryare acceptable to the other signatories
• Make every effort to ensure that the registering /licensing body recognizes signatories’ programs
13 August 2006 6
-
8/20/2019 MELJUN CORTES ACCORD Presentation Meljun
7/27
Benchmarking Agreement
• The signatories will identify and encouragethe implementation of best practice for theacademic preparation of engineers
– by mutual regular monitoring on a six-year cycle – regular communication and sharing of
accreditation information
– sharing and maintaining lists of accreditedprograms
– invitations to observe accreditation visits andmeetings of any boards
13 August 2006 7
-
8/20/2019 MELJUN CORTES ACCORD Presentation Meljun
8/27
• Program criteria of signatories are benchmarkedagainst a metric called the WA graduate attributeexemplar
• The exemplar includes: – a defined knowledge base (WK1-8), – a definition problem complexity (WP1-7) and – a defined set of graduate attributes (WA1-12)
• The knowledge base and definition of complexityserve to clarify and interpret the language of theattributes
Graduate Attribute Exemplar
13 August 2006 8
-
8/20/2019 MELJUN CORTES ACCORD Presentation Meljun
9/27
Knowledge Base
13 August 2006 9
WK1: A systematic, theory-based understanding of the natural sciences applicable to the discipline
WK2:Conceptually-based mathematics, numerical analysis, statistics and formal aspects of computer and
information science to support analysis and modelling applicable to the discipline
WK3: A systematic, theory-based formulation of engineering fundamentals required in the engineering
discipline
WK4:Engineering specialist knowledge that provides theoretical frameworks and bodies of knowledgefor the accepted practice areas in the engineering discipline; much is at the forefront of the discipline.
WK5: Knowledge that supports engineering design in a practice area
WK6: Knowledge of engineering practice and the practice areas in the engineering discipline
WK7:Comprehension of the role of engineering in society and identified issues in engineering practicein the discipline: ethics and the professional responsibility of an engineer to public safety; the
impacts of engineering activity: economic, social, cultural, environmental and sustainability
WK8: Engagement with selected knowledge in the research literature of the discipline
A program that builds this type of knowledge and develops the appropriate attributes is typically achieved in 4 to 5 years of study.
-
8/20/2019 MELJUN CORTES ACCORD Presentation Meljun
10/27
Characteristics of Complex Problems
WP1
WP2 Involve wide-ranging or conflicting technical, engineering and other issues
WP3 Have no obvious solution - require abstract thinking, originality in analysis toformulate suitable models
WP4 Involve infrequently encountered issues
WP5 Are outside problems encompassed by standards and codes of practice for
professional engineering
WP6 Involve diverse groups of stakeholders with widely varying needs
WP7 Are high level problems including many component parts or sub-problems
Cannot be resolved without in-depth engineering knowledge at an advanced level
1013 August 2006
-
8/20/2019 MELJUN CORTES ACCORD Presentation Meljun
11/27
• Ability to deal with complex problems is explicitly specifiedfor most (8 of 12) attributes in the WA exemplar
• The ability to address complex problems in their academicpreparation is usually the distinguishing feature of aprofessional engineer relative to an engineering
technologist or technician
• Complex problems are defined as requiring: – advanced engineering knowledge and – one or more characteristic from WP2 to WP7:
• Wide-ranging
• Originality• Rarity• Outside codes• Diverse stakeholders• High-level
Significance of Complex Problems
13 August 2006 11
-
8/20/2019 MELJUN CORTES ACCORD Presentation Meljun
12/27
• Each signatory defines the standards for againstwhich engineering educational programs areaccredited within their jurisdictions
• WA graduate attributes form a set of measurable
outcomes
• WA graduate attributes are clear, succinct statementsof expected capability (competencies)
• WA graduate attributes are intended primarily toassist signatories and provisional members todevelop outcomes based accreditation criteria for useby their respective jurisdictions
Role of WA Graduate Attributes
13 August 2006 12
-
8/20/2019 MELJUN CORTES ACCORD Presentation Meljun
13/27
• The WA graduate attributes do not constitute an“international standard” for accredited programs
• The WA exemplar is simply one way of organizingthe competencies to be delivered in anundergraduate engineering program
• But it does provide a widely accepted common frameof reference within which bodies can describe theoutcomes of substantially equivalent programs
Limitations of WA Graduate Attributes
13 August 2006 13
-
8/20/2019 MELJUN CORTES ACCORD Presentation Meljun
14/27
Attributes
13 August 2006 14
WA1: Engineering Knowledge:
Apply knowledge of mathematics, natural science, engineering fundamentals and an engineering
specialization as specified in WK1 to WK4 respectively to the solution of complex engineer ing
problems.
WA2: Problem Analysis:
Identify, formulate, research literature and analyse complex engineer ing problems reaching
substantiated conclusions using first principles of mathematics, natural sciences and engineering
sciences. (WK1 to WK4)
WA3: Design:
Design solutions for complex engineer ing problems and design systems, components or
processes that meet specified needs with appropriate consideration for public health and safety,
cultural, societal, and environmental considerations. (WK5)
WA4: Investigation:
Conduct investigations of complex engineer ing problems using research-based knowledge (WK8)
and research methods including design of experiments, analysis and interpretation of data, and
synthesis of information to provide valid conclusions.
WA5: Modern Tool Usage:
Create, select and apply appropriate techniques, resources, and modern engineering and IT tools,
including prediction and modelling, to complex engineer ing problems , with an understanding of the
limitations. (WK6)
WA6: The Engineer and Society:
Apply reasoning informed by contextual knowledge to assess societal, health, safety, legal and
cultural issues and the consequent responsibilities relevant to professional engineering practice and
solutions to complex engineer ing problems . (WK7)
WA7: Environment and Sustainability:Understand and evaluate the sustainability and impact of professional engineering work in the
solution of complex engineer ing problems in societal and environmental contexts. (WK7)
WA8: Ethics: Apply ethical principles and commit to professional ethics and responsibilities and norms of
engineering practice. (WK7)
WA9: Individual and Team Work: Function effectively as an individual, and as a member or leader in diverse teams and in multi-disciplinary settings.
WA10: Communication:
Communicate effectively on complex en gineering activit ies with the engineering community and
with society at large, such as being able to comprehend and write effective reports and design
documentation, make effective presentations, and give and receive clear instructions.
WA11: Project Management and Finance:
Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of engineering management principles and economic
decision-making and apply these to one’s own work, as a member and leader in a team, to manage
projects and in multidisciplinary environments.
WA12: Lifelong Learning:Recognize the need for, and have the preparation and ability to engage in independent and life-long
learning in the broadest context of technological change.
-
8/20/2019 MELJUN CORTES ACCORD Presentation Meljun
15/27
• The attributes provide a framework but do not set arigid standard – a knowledge base is defined (but only in general terms) – problem complexity is defined but……
• Even clear and succinct statements of attributes
leave room for legitimate interpretation
• The WA exemplar is something to measure ourselvesagainst – a metric not a mandatory set of regulations
• We can perhaps agree that the WA exemplar issomething we can all aspire to and use as a“yardstick” to measure our progress
The Exemplar is a Metric
13 August 2006 15
-
8/20/2019 MELJUN CORTES ACCORD Presentation Meljun
16/27
• Do we all mean the same thing when we say: – “appropriate consideration”, – “apply reasoning”, – “function effectively”, – “communicate effectively”, – “commit to professional ethics and responsibilities”
– “first principles of mathematics and natural sciences”?
• Can we group the components that make up the set ofattributes differently?
– is twelve a magic number?• Can we use more or less attributes?• Can we eliminate some attributes?• Do we need to add more attributes?
– where do graduate attributes end …… – and professional competencies begin?
Interpretation and Ambiguity
13 August 2006 16
-
8/20/2019 MELJUN CORTES ACCORD Presentation Meljun
17/27
• How do the criteria we use in our jurisdictionmatch up?
Using the Exemplar as a Metric
13 August 2006 17
-
8/20/2019 MELJUN CORTES ACCORD Presentation Meljun
18/27
Are All Performance Levels Equal?
13 August 2006 18
E n g i n e e r i n g K n o w l e d g e
P r o b l e m A n a l y s i s
D e s i g n
I n
v e s t i g a t i o n
M o d e r n T o o l U s a g e
T h e E n g i n e e r a n d S o c i e t y
E n v i r o n m e n t a n d S u s t a i n a b i l i t y
E t h i c s
I n
d i v i d u a l a n d T e a m W o r k
C o m m u n i c a t i o n
P r o j e c t M a n a g e m e n t a n d F i n a n c e
L i f e l o n g L e a r n i n g
W A 1 :
W A 2 :
W A 3 :
W A 4 :
W A 5 :
W A 6 :
W A 7 :
W A 8 :
W A 9 :
W A 1 0 :
W A 1 1 :
W A 1 2 :
Exceeds x x x x
Fully meets x x x x
Marginally meets x x
Does not meet x x
Criteria
Alignment
Analysis
-
8/20/2019 MELJUN CORTES ACCORD Presentation Meljun
19/27
• How do the criteria we use in our jurisdictionmatch up?
• How do we distribute time and resources
toward the delivery each attribute?
Using the Exemplar as a Metric
13 August 2006 19
-
8/20/2019 MELJUN CORTES ACCORD Presentation Meljun
20/27
Are All Attributes Equal?
13 August 2006 20
P r o b l e
m A n a l y s i s
D e s i g n
I n v e s t i g a t i o n
M o d e r n T o o l U s a g e
T h e E n
g i n e e r a n d S o c i e t y
E n v i r o
n m e n t a n d S u s t a i n a b i l i t y
E t h i c s
I n d i v i d
u a l a n d T e a m W o r k
C o m m
u n i c a t i o n
P r o j e c
t M a n a g e m e n t a n d F i n a n c e
L i f e l o n
g L e a r n i n g
WK1:
Natural
Sciences
WK2:
Mathematics
WK3:
Engineering
Fundamentals
WK4:
Discipline-
Specific W A 2 :
W A 3 :
W A 4 :
W A 5 :
W A 6 :
W A 7 :
W A 8 :
W A 9 :
W A 1 0 :
W A 1 1 :
W A 1 2 :
Exceeds x x x x x x x
Fully meets x x x x
Marginally meets x x
Does not meet x x
Criteria
Alignment
Analysis
WA1: Engineering Knowledge
-
8/20/2019 MELJUN CORTES ACCORD Presentation Meljun
21/27
• How do the criteria we use in our jurisdictionmatch up?
• How do we distribute time and resources
toward the delivery each attribute?• How do our accredited programs perform for
each attribute?
Using the Exemplar as a Metric
13 August 2006 21
-
8/20/2019 MELJUN CORTES ACCORD Presentation Meljun
22/27
Is Acceptable Performance a Range?
13 August 2006 22
-
8/20/2019 MELJUN CORTES ACCORD Presentation Meljun
23/27
• How do the criteria we use in our jurisdictionmatch up?
• How do we distribute time and resources
toward the delivery each attribute?• How do our accredited programs perform for
each attribute?
• What changes might we want to consider
….or even encourage?
Using the Exemplar as a Metric
13 August 2006 23
-
8/20/2019 MELJUN CORTES ACCORD Presentation Meljun
24/27
Is This Our Aspiration?
13 August 2006 24
-
8/20/2019 MELJUN CORTES ACCORD Presentation Meljun
25/27
• Remember that the WA exemplar and our jurisdictional criteria are “living documents”
• They will change as we learn and adopt newtechnologies and practices in striving toimprove the quality of our programs
• Standing still is not an option!
Final Thought
13 August 2006 25
-
8/20/2019 MELJUN CORTES ACCORD Presentation Meljun
26/27
Questions?
2613 August 2006
-
8/20/2019 MELJUN CORTES ACCORD Presentation Meljun
27/27
For more information:Email: [email protected]
Phone: 613-232-2474 *The terms P.ENG. and ING. are official marks held by the Canadian Council of Professional Engineers.