Participation through Information Literacy
Libraries qualifying their users for knowledge society
Benjamin Blinten, M.A., M.A. (LIS)School of Library and Information Science
Humboldt University Berlin
Participation through Information Literacy (Benjamin Blinten)
2
Overview
1. Classic approach to user instruction
2. A new paradigm: teaching information literacy
3. The participatory potential of information literacy instruction
4. Examples from United States and Germany
5. The gap between claims and reality
Participation through Information Literacy (Benjamin Blinten)
3
The Challenge
Libraries as a place that enables users to satisfy wide range of information needs
Role of librarians not only as providers, but also as active conveyors of information
From gatekeepers of collections to supporters of information processes
From library instruction to teaching information literacy
Participation through Information Literacy (Benjamin Blinten)
4
Classic approach to user instruction
Harvard University Library: first catalog instruction from ~1820
Why in the U.S.? Highs and lows in 19th and 20th centuries Classic approach: library and product
centered catalogs, bibliographic research, library space, regulations
Instruction became more important with electronic tools from the 1970s and 80s
Participation through Information Literacy (Benjamin Blinten)
5
A new paradigm: teaching information literacy
Term coined by Paul G. Zurkowski (1974): „anyone who has learned to use a wide range of information sources in order to solve problems“
Final Report of the ALA Presidential Committee on Information Literacy (1989)
Positioning libraries as important agents in the information society
Participation through Information Literacy (Benjamin Blinten)
6
Emphasis on the educational character of libraries life-long learning
New quality of user instruction not limited to library itself
„learning how to learn“ as a new methodical soft skill
Whole information process is adressed various theoretical models
Definition of standards based on models, e.g. ACRL standards of IL
A new paradigm: teaching information literacy
Participation through Information Literacy (Benjamin Blinten)
7
More attention to didactic principles: Target group definition Topic and task oriented definition of learning
goals Activating methods
Cooperation with teaching staff E-Learning components:
Tutorials Video clips Virtual tours
A new paradigm: teaching information literacy
Participation through Information Literacy (Benjamin Blinten)
8
Carol Kuhlthau‘s model of the information search process
Source: http://comminfo.rutgers.edu/~kuhlthau/information_search_process.htm
The participatory potential of information literacy instructionSimplified versus complex models of information process:
IL is not only a set of working techniques!
IL instruction has the potential to support: Self-awareness Creativity Active, skeptical, varied information behavior Well-founded personal position
Participation through Information Literacy (Benjamin Blinten)
9
The participatory potential of information literacy instructionDemocratic society needs more than elections – its fabric is an information literate public:
Evaluate work of politicians and parties Question media reports Define personal position in controversies Participate in societal and political discourse
through internet
Essential skill for a society of informed citizens!
Participation through Information Literacy (Benjamin Blinten)
10
Participation through Information Literacy (Benjamin Blinten)
11
Examples from United States
IL instruction accepted as routine task of libraries, especially at universities and large public libraries
Core: library and database instruction Flexible additional content (e.g. plagiarism,
web search, financial literacy) Often standard oriented Examples for course designs:
Lake Land College Rhode Island University
Participation through Information Literacy (Benjamin Blinten)
12
Situation in Germany
No tradition in user instruction Reception of American concepts from mid
90s, hot topic in 2000s Participatory potential not realized so far Now accepted as routine task, but
executed on widely varying levels Concentration on bibliographic research
skills Cooperative approach: IL networks,
LOTSE
Participation through Information Literacy (Benjamin Blinten)
13
Example from Germany: University Library Freiburg
Self-image as teaching library
2005: 453 events with 6149 participants, 1423 staff hours
Didactical training for teaching librarians
Integrated into B.A. curricula
„Competence and learning center“ as sub-department devoted to IL instruction
Participation through Information Literacy (Benjamin Blinten)
14
The gap between claims and reality
Claims of libraries: Experts in the search for quality information Experts in teaching IL Access to information for all citizens Relevance for todays‘s internet dominated
knowledge society
Successes: IL instruction growingly seen as standard service Embedded in more and more curricula Cooperation between public libraries and high schools 2006: IFLA guidelines on information literacy
Participation through Information Literacy (Benjamin Blinten)
15
The gap between claims and reality
Reality check: Seen by many as additional, not as routine task IL instruction often limited to classic library skills Librarians have often negative view of internet Not enough cooperation with teachers Role switch from supporter to teacher Course designs often didactically poor Rarely centered on actual user activities Ethical questions usually discussed in a
restrictive manner (copyright, plagiarism) Creative, cooperative and participatory
potentials rarely addressed
The gap between claims and reality
If we design IL instruction that is relevant for our specific target audience and make our courses fun, creative and participatory,
we will be successful!
Participation through Information Literacy (Benjamin Blinten)
16
Thank you very much for your attention!
Benjamin Blinten ([email protected])