PERMIT APPLICATION
for a, , , , ,
LAND TREATMENT AREA
at theOKLAHOMA REFINING COMPANY
CYRIL REFINERY
CADDO COUNTY
OKLAHOMA
SEPTEMBER 1981
^^^^"ve/ ^Rebord Documento o o o ^ /
EER1NG, !NC. 1001
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION 11.1
INTRODUCTIONPurposeHistory of OperationActivity AssignmentsEnvironmental Isipact
1 . 21.31 . 4
SECTION 22. 12.22.3
SECTION 33.13 . 23.33.43.53 . 6
ggIiQN 44 . 1
SITE DESCRIPTIONLocationProperty DescriptionRefinery Plan and Description
_PESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONRun-On ControlRun-Off ControlMonitoring WellsAccessApplication of WasteWaste Incorporation
SITE EVALUATIONTopogriphy4.1.1 Contours4.1.2 100 Year Flood PlainClimate4.24 . 2 . 1 Temperatures4 . 2 . 2 RainfallStratigraphy4.3
4.4 Soils Engineering Properties4 . 4 . 1 Test Parameters' ' " Soil Classification4. 4 . 24 . 4 . 34 . 4 . 44 . 4 . 54 . 4 . 64 . 4 . 7
Grain Sizp DistributionPermeabilityPercolation TestsAtterberg LimitsSummary of Test Results
4 . 5 Agricultural Soil Analysis4 . 5 . 1 Samples and Test Location/- c n Test Parameters
pH Values4 . 5 . 24.5.34.5.44.5.5
Soil Fertility LevelsCation Exchange Capacities
5555555666677777777888
5up^na AdministrativeRecord Document
0000/12•wa
fENSURING, INC.
1001 *•
4 . 6 Heavy Metals Analysis-Unsaturated Zone4 . 6 . 1 Test Parameters4 . 6 . 2 Soluble & Unsoluble Concentrations4 . 6 . 3 Soluble Concentrations4 . 6 . 4 Factor of Safety
4.7 Groundwater Analysis4 . 7 . 1 Monitor Wells4 . 7 . 2 Water Samples :4 . 7 . 3 test Results
4.8 Location ,and Access
SECTION 5 MONITORING- PLAN5.0 General5 . 1 Unsaturated Zone-Agricultural Soil
Analysis5 . 1 . 1 Test Parameters5 . 1 . 2 Frequency of Testing5 . 1 . 3 Facility Operation
5.2 Unsaturated Zone-Heavy Metals SoilAnalysis5 . 2 . 1 Test Parameters5 . 2 . 2 Frequency of Testing5. 2 . 3 Number of Samples Required5.2*4 Detection of Vertical Migration
5.3 Groundwater Analysis5 . 3 . 1 Monitor Wells5 . 3 . 2 Test Characteristics5 . 3 . 3 Test Parameters for Suitability5 . 3 . 4 Test Parameters for Quality5 . 3 . 5 Test Parameters for Contamination5 . 3 . 6 Frequency of Testing (First Year)5 . 3 . 7 Frequency of Testing (After
First Year)5 . 3 . 8 Water Table Elevation5 . 3 . 9 Sampling & Testing Methods
5.4 Waste Sludge Analysis5 . 4 . 1 Test Samples5 . 4 . 2 Sources of Sludge5 . 4 . 3 Test Parameters5.4. 4 Frequency of Testing5 . 4 . 5 Test Methods
5*5 Summary of Monitoring Plan
SECTION 6 CLOSURE & POST CLOSURE6 . 1 Closure6.2 Post Cloaure Monitoring6 . 3 Post Closure Maintenance
' "^>.4 Closure & Post Closure Financing
88999
1010101010
1111
11111111
11111212121212121 2131313
14141414141415151515
16161616
i?perfund AdministratSyRecord Document ^
0 0 0 0 4 ^
1NEERING.1NC.1Q01 ^
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment 2 . 1Attachment 2.2Attachment 2.3Attachment 2.4Attachment 4 . 1Attachment 4.2Attachment 4.3Attachment 4,4Attachment 4.5Attachment 4 . 6Attachment 5.1Attachment 5.2
Description of Land Treatment AreaQuadrangle Map of Cyril AreaDescription of Refinery PropertyPlat of Refinery PropertyOWRB 100 Year Flood Plain LetterLocation Map of Cyril, OklahomaAgricultural Soils Analysis SummaryTotal Heavy Metals Test ResultfiE . P . Toxicity Extractions SummaryWater Sample AnalysisAPI Sludge AnalysisMonitoring Plan Summary
DRAWINGS
Drawing 1001-D-99Drawing 1001-D-102Drawing 1001-D-124
Facility Site PlanWater Monitor Wells, Plan & Detail;Topography & Dike Layout
APPENDIX
APPENDIX "A' Soil Report by Shepherd Engineering andTesting C o . . I n c . ; September. 1981
Sype^und AdministratiK@Record Document .
0 0 4 4 -
-c 1001
SECTION 1
INTRODUCTION
1.1 PURPOSE
Oklahoma Refining Company has been operating a land treatmentarea at their Cyril, Oklahoma Refinery for approximately tenyears* This report is being submitted to comply with interimstatus requirements of governing regulatory agencies.
1 . 2 HISTORY OF OPERATION
The facility to date has experienced a low level of operationin regard to total volume of waste received and levels ofconcentration for hazardous constituents within the soil zoneof incorporation.
1 . 3 ACTIVITY ASSIGNMENTS
Sample testing and analysis for this report has been performedby Southwest Laboratories of Oklahoma - Tulsa, Oklahoma forheavy metals soil analysis, groundwater analysis and sludgeanalysis; by Shepherd Engineering T&sting Co., Inc > - Norman,Oklahoma for soil boring, sample gathering and soils engineer-ing analysis; and by Oklahoma State University, Soil and WaterService Laboratory. Agronomy Department for agricultural soilsanalysis.
1 . 4 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
The environmental impact of the facility is considered to benegligible due to minimum usage, good operation procedures byORC, and its location relative to the refinery and theconaounity.
Superfund AdministrattRecord Row^nt
1001
SECTION 2
SITE DESCRIPTION
2-1 LOCATION
The ORC land treatment area is located on a tract of land inthe southwest corner of the Cyril Refinery of Oklahoma RefiningCompany. Adjacent property to the north and east *if this landtreatment area is the remainder of the refinery property. Ad~jacent property to the west is residential for H. mile. Adjacentproperty to the south and beyond the limits of the property dis-cussed above is classed as farmland or has agricultural uses.The City of Cyril is building a sewage treatment plant of pro-perty south of the refinery site in the SW^ of Section 19, T5N,R9W.
2.2 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
A description of the land treatment area is included as Attach-ment 2.1 to this section* Refer Co Attachment 2.2, which is acopy of a portion of the 15* Quadrangle map for the area sur-rounding Cyril, Oklahoma* Locations of the land treatment areaand refinery property have been indicated.
2.3 REFINERY PLAN AND DESCRIPTION
Refer to drawing D-99 which shows the Facility Site Plan of therefinery. A description of the refinery property is included asAttachment 2.3 of this section. Afctachement 2.^, a plat of therefinery property, is also included for reference.
r^?
,, 4 .AA.; -, •ir,,1^.Superfund Administratj/e
Record Document
0 0 0 0 4 < J
1001
SECTION 3
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATION
3 . 1 RUN-ON CONTROL
The site for the land treatment area is flat, gently slopingland. Only a portion of the facility (approximately 3 . 7 acres)is being actively used at this time. The remainder of the de-signated area is upgradient of the active portion. Runoff fromthis clean area is diverted by ditch around the active portionto prevent run-on during rainstorms.
3 . 2 RUN-OFF CONTROL '
An earthen dike has been constructed around the active portion "^to contain all rainfall in the area(for a 100 year. 24 hour 0duration, 7.5 inch total rainfall). The dike has further di- 0vided the active land treatment area into an upper and lower Qarea. Due to the topography and existing terracing, two sep- —arate areas are required. Grading has been performed to ensurethe surface is free of abrupt irregularities, and has smoothand gentle slopes. Refer to drawing 0-124 for location of theberm.
3.3 MONITORING WELLS
Four monitoring wells have been placed adjacent to the landtreatment area. One well is placed up-gradient: and three down"gradient. Refer to drawing D-124 for their placement.
3 . 4 ACCESS
Entrance to the land treatment area can be made at the northwestcorner through a, gate that is locked at the end of each day.However, normal traffic from the refinery to the facility gainentry from the northeast.
3 . 5 APPLICATION OF WASTE
Trucks making deliveries to the land treatment area approachthe dumping area along the west side. After dri'-/ing Co theselected dump area and positioning the truck properly, the wastematerial is dumped from a steel sled or a dump truck. The steelsled is water tight to prevent leakage while transporting throughthe refinery to the facility.
Because of the small amounts of sludge and waste material generated.the steel sled is used more often than a dump truck* Therefore,£he sludge is deposited on the land treatment area in small piles»Afterwards, these small piles are spread evenly over the soilusing a road grader or a tractor with a blade attachment.
Superfund Admimstra iveRecord Document
0 0 0 0 4 7
1 .,..t- m. •.—.^! .-Trf. .B
INE^RING.INC.
3.6
A'." '«
• f•^ ;-' ^1 //\f-y <
V tf Jt
It is current practice of the refinery to not make wasteapplications when rainy conditions exist and uhen the groundis frozen during the winter season of the year.
WASTE INCORPORATION
In order to efficiently utilize the available nitrogen in thewaste material» all oiJ.y wastes are incorporated into the soilas soon as practicable after application. Waste incorporationin performed by plowing and discing the land treatment area toobtain a homogeneous mixture of soil and waste. This activityalso accomplishes aeration of the soil which ensures aerobicconditions exist in the zone of incorporation.
.\
.•-c . >-
\
•-E ^ .1 ^Record Document., - i _, .I'^T^
0 0 0 0 4 8
INHERING, INC. • IPOl •""'HI. 1 , 0 - ' r . r.l^ i , : ;• •! . - • - • .\S• f I i ' 1 ^ ' AI.'
SECTION 4
SITE EVALUATION
^ • 1 TOPOGRAPHY
'*. 1 -1 ContoursThe site is characteriacicly flat with smooth contourllnea. The slope of the *acllity, which Is lees than5Xt will easily lend it;: if to controlling erosion andsurface water runoff. Ri 'er to drawing D-124 for topo-graphy contours.
4.1.2 100 .Year,Flood PlainThe elevation of the facility places it above the 100 yearflood plain. Refer to Attachment 4.1, the August 25, 1981letter from the Oklahona Water Resources Board. The letterverifies Section 19, T5N, R9W has no areas within the 100year flood plain.
Temperature aCyril, Oklahoma is located southwest of Oklahoma City about15 miles northeasterly from Lavton. Refer to AttachmentA.2. The climate is seasonal in nature with long hot sum-mers the usual case. Cold winters are the exception withDecember, January and February being the coldest months.Usually there is little snow accumulation and consequentlyfrozen soil exists only for a short tipie and to only ashallow depth. The mean date of first fall freeze is Nov-ember 3 and of last spring freeze is April 2. This can beinterpreted as a growing season of 210 days.
The normal annual average temperature for Lawton is 62.7 Fand Apache is 61.9 P; this yields an average for Cyril of62.9 F. The daily average temperature is above 60°F forover 7 months of the year. During the summer months, max-imum temperatures above 90 F are the norm with maximumtemperatures 100 E' and above occuring quite frequently.
Rainfall
The Cyril area experiences peaks in rainfall during theearly spring and late fall. The hot and dry periods are-the months of July and August. Occasionally these dryperiods increase in severity and duration. This is typical.fot-the plains state dt-sa. ;
.The normal annual rainfalX for Lawton is 30.2 inches andjApache is 32,30 inches; this results in an average of 31.2•inches .for Cyril. /^ ' ^' ( -•A
'' ' ' ': : Superfund AdnrunistralRecord Document
c • 10011NEERING.INC
4.3 STRATIGRAPHY
The project area is underlain by fiilty clays, a gypsum layer,and aandstone scracas. The silty clay varies from 4.5 to 13.6feet in depth. Where the clay reaches a rather shallow depth,It is underlain by a gypsum formation which is approximately 10to 11 feet thick.
Below the gypsum formar.ion, additional bedrock features appearas red and brown sandstones. In all boring holes carried to adepth of 30 and 60 feec the aandst-ona stmca was not penetrated.The top surface of the sandstone formal: ion is approximately levelwith roughly an elevation of 1336 feet. The facility grade ele-vations vary froaa 1356.68 to 1344.76 feet.
In summary, the land treatment area is directly underlain byeither a sily clay/gyp&um formation or a ailty clay layer. Thesllty clay has a very low permeability and the gypsum lay r isconsidered to be impervious. The depth below grade for the siltyclay/sypsutti formation varies from 10.5 Co 23 feec. The depth be-low grade for the sHty clay at rat a, when gypaum is not present,varies froci 11.5 to 13 feet . In both cases, the clay and/or gyp-sum constitutes a geologic unit: ideally suited to retard themovement of groundwatcr to the water table.
4.4 SOILS ENGINEERING PROPERTIES
4.4.1 T^t ParametersThe soil in the unsaturated zone must have certain pro-perties and characteristics to ensure a proper breakdownof the oily wastes applied. At the sarae time the soilmust have the capability of preventing a migration ofheavy metals into the gronndwater. Soil testing of con-tinuous samples taken from fche land treatment area havebeen performed. The soils engineering parameters coveredby the testing are the following:
ooo
'0
0
0
Dry Unit WeightAtterberg LiaitsPercent passing 200 mesh sieveSoil classification per the U.S.C.SPermeability testsPercolation tests
4.4.2 Soil_ ClassificationUnder the Unified Soil Classification System, all theaamples tested above the 11.0 foot depth are in the CLgroup. The CL group is made up of inorganic clays oflow to medium plasticity, gravelly clays, sandy claysor silty clays. The soil &£ the ORC facility is siltyclay with a depth that vsrias from 4.5 feet to 13.6 feetAt the shallower depths Cho ailty clay is underlain bya strata of gypsum which is approximately 10 to 11 feetthick.
Superfund Administer iveRecord Document
1001INHERING, INC.
4.4.3 Grain S ize_ Pis fc r iby t ionRCRA recominerids land treatment facllitieh utilize soilwhich has more than 502 of the soil passing the 200 meahsieve. This is also an indication of the clay content; ofthe soil. At the ORC facility all samples tested abovethe 1 1 foot depth have a percent passing greater than 50%.The average for 15 samples Is 88.6;.
^•^^ Permcabillty^The permeability of the eoil must be low, therefore causingpercolation through the aoil to be slow and allowing thesoil matrix to break down the waste material into insol-uble forms for retention in the upper soil layers. Theaverage penaeability of the soil at Cyril -is 88.6 X 10~6
cm/aec., a very low permeability.
4.4.5 Percolation TestsThe percolation tests requested by the ODH were performed.After drilling and completing each monitor well, a secondhold was drilled approximately 3 feet away. After thewater table elevation had stabilized in each hole, a mea-sured amount of water was added to the monitor well casingonly. As expected, the wells attempted to equalize eachother over a period of time. Even though this is not astandard test, the data is presented in the soil report.
^ •4 ,6 Atterberg Limit 8The Atterberg limics of the soil can also be an Indicationas to its suitability for serving as a barrier to the pas-sage of hazardous wastes. The liquid limit should be ap-proximately 30 with a plasticity index of around 15 . Thesoil at Cyril generally falls within these requirements.
4 .4 .7 Susanary of Test ResultsR-ifer to the soil report (Appendix A) for an Itemizedlisting of the laboratory test results discussed above.
4.5 AGRICULTURAL SOIL ANALYSIS
^•5.1 Samples & Test LocationTopsoii samples were taken at each core boring locationand analyzed by the Soil and Water Service Laboratory,Department of Agronomy, Oklahoma State University, Still-water, Oklahoma.
4.5.2 Test ParametersThe testing determined background values for the variousparameters listed below:
(N) Nitrogen(P) Phosphorous(K) Potassium(Ca) Calcium(Mg) Magnesium
Superfund Administr< iveRecord Document
( 1 1 1 r 11 "i" 1 ' i r i i " " " •"' "• ""'C J1"11 1" "" i i ' i ' i " ' i ">. 1001
3pH Values
Lime Requirement - to raise pHSS, 6.5
Cation Exchange Capacity " CEC
Refer to Attachment 4.3, Agricultural Soils AnalysisSuiamary for a listing of the teat resulsa,
4.5.3 Values of^pHThe topsoil samples are silty clays In texture and acidic.Soil pH ranges from 4.9 to 7.5 (Average aa 6.5) in the ac-tive portion of the facility. The unused area of thefacility has pH values from 5*1 CO 5.8 (Average 3a 5.5).
I.A.5 .4 Soil^ Fertility Levels C
Existing soil ferti l i ty levels for the primary elements <are as follows: nitrogen, 7 to 28 Ibs/acre (note: the220 value in CB ^4 was noc included); phosphorous, 5 to 96Ibs/acre; potassium. 153 Co 386 Iba/acre. The secondaryelements of calcium and magnesium have the respectiveranges: 2904 to 7934 Ibs/acre and 557 to 999 Ibs/acre.
^•5.5 Cation Exchange CapacitiesCation Exchange Capacities have been determined for thisclass of soil. Refer to Soil Report, Appendix A for list-ing of results*
4.6 HEAVY METALS ANALYSIS - UNSATURATED ZONE
^*6.1 Test^ Pa rame tersTesting has been performed to determine the concentrationof heavy metals in the unaaturated zone of the land treat-ment area. The following is a listing of these test para-meters:
ArsenicBariumCadmiumChromiumLeadMercurySeleniumSilverCopperNickelZinc
This testing vill serve to establish background data forthe portion of the land Ereatsient area that is being used
' " • ' ' & s veil as the uniiaed portion.
Superfund AdministrRecord Documen
<T 1001
4.6.2 S Q 1 u ble and Unsqluble ConcentrationsThe fcufcai heavy metals (soluble and unsoluble) in the soilwere determined to a depth of four (4) feet at each of thesoil boring locations. Refer to drawing D-124 for Ibcationof core borings. This testing was performed to evaluatethe extent and concentration of heavy metals migration todate.The results of this testing indicated only a negligiblevariance in the concentrations of heavy metals between theused and unused portion of the land treatment area; andalso with depth in each boring* Refe-r to Attachment 4,4 for& st results^ . . , . - . . . . , ^ iIn ai^^i011 t;? ^e heavy metals testing performed, valueswere also obtained for pH, TOG. and oil content. The TOCand oil concent results indicate that presently a very lowlevel of oil loading to the top soil exists. The values,when viewed relative to depth at each sample location, alsoindicate that no adverse waste leaching has occurred whichcould eventually contaminate the groundwater.
4.6.3 Soluble concentrationsBased on these initial results, testing was performed todetermine the soluble concentrations of heavy metals inthe upper 2 feet of the soil The testing procedure wasper 40 CFR Part 261» Appendix II-EP Toxicity Test Proce-dure. Refer to Attachment 4,5 for test results. Two (2)samples were taken from each boring at the 0-1 f t . leveland the 1-2 f t . level.
Factor of Safetyusing the maximum concentrations listed in 40 CRF Part261.24, Table I, average factors of safety have beencalculated for each level ,an4 re displayed below.
h"IT
Pactor of Safety =• (cone. limit/cone.average)O'- l 1 le^el P-2* level ~^Parameter
J£ ;
ArsenicBariumCadmiumChromiumLeadMercurySeleniumSilver
7155511171020014125
125111120831040020125
Again only a negligible variance in the teachable con-centrations of heavy metals exists between the activeportion and the unused area of the Isnd treatment fact-
Superfrnd Administrative.ir-l r *". i H'1'XAfl'l" 000053
VA" ' ^iNEERING,lNC.
1001
lity. In addition, there is a notable increase in thefactors of safety between the 0 to 1 foot level and the1 to 2 foot level. This Indicates good operational prac-
' tices have been followed by ORC in loading and maintain"ing the facility,
4 . 7 GROUNDWATER ANALYSIS
4 . 7 . 1 MonitpJ WellsFour monitor wells have been installed adjacent to the
: - —land treatment area. Refer to drawings D-102 and D-124' ' ' • ' - for thsir location and details of installation. During
their installation, the water table was encountered atroughly 15 feet. At each well the casing was installedto a depth of 30 feet with well screen installed on thelower 15 feet.
4 . 7 . 2 Water SamplesSoil borings /U, S3, and ff4 were taken to a depth of 60faet, the wai-er table was encountered at roughly a depthof 15 feet. Water samples were taken for water analysis.The results are displayed in Attachment 4 . 6 . The soilborings were backfilled with. bentontte pellets to grade.
4 . 7 . 3 Test ResultsThe test results indicate very low and acceptable levelsof parameter concentrations. Again, this is indicativeof a properly operated land treatment area. The leacha-
t ^ilifcy of the hazardous constituents is extremely low and-i their liklihood of reaching the water table is quite remote.
4.8 LOCATION AND AC"SSS
The site is quite suitably located in regard to the refinery.All waste generated by the refinery can be delivered to the sitewithout leaving the refinery limits. Additional considerationsfor such items as traffic controls vehicle access, populationdensity and zoning regulations certainly require adequate review.However, sinch the material remains within the refinery limitsand the land treatment area is been operational for approximatelyten years without adverse effects to the"community, the definitelybecome secondary in nature.
Superfund AdministrativeRecord Document
INHERING, INC.
SECTION 5
MONITORING PLAN
GENERAL
The monitoring plan for the facility will monitor and recordcertain test parameters f&r the unsafcurated zone, the ground-water and the waste sludge applied to the soil.
[^•SATURATED ZONE - AGRICULTURAL SOIL A^UY&IS
5.1.1 Test ParametersThe following parameters will be monitored:
ooSoil fertility levels
W Nitrogen(p) PhosphorousW Potassium(Ca) Calcium<Mg) Magnesium
oo pH valueLime requirement - to raise pH 6 . 5Cation Exchange Capacity - CEC
5 . 1 . 2 Frequency of TestingThe soil fertility levels, pH value, lime requirementand CEC will be tested on an annual basis at OklahomaState University. Four samples will be taken from theactive portion of the land treatment area.
5.1.3 Fac ili ty Operat ion
The above information, coupled with the sludge analysis,will allow calculation of sludge application rates tomaintain proper operating conditions of the land treat-ment area. -
Care must be taken to maintain the level of pH^6.5.This gives the soil a greater ability to retain heavymetals in a form that is insoluble and unavailable forplant uptake.
For maximum utilization of the sludge as a source of plantavailable nitrogen, the rate of application will be deter-mined by the nitrogen content of the soil and the sludge- t;p be applied*
t . .
UNSATURATEB-20ME - HEAVY METALS SOIL ANALYSIS
5.2,1 Tes t _P.aranietj;rs -
' 'Due to very low levels of concentrations for certain trace'elements tested, only the following, ones will be pionitorcd;
1001 f9
', f.. -
CadmiumCliromiuraLeadSelenium
In addition, the testing will also record the TOC andoil content of the soil.
5.2,2 Frequency of TestingAnnual testing will be perrormad, using the EP ToxicityTesting Procedure, Co measure the soluble haavy metals Kconcentrations in the top 12 inches of the soil and at a -depth of approximat-ely 36 inches. ^
\05 - 2 - 3 Number of Samples RequiredThe size of the active portion of the soil farm is 3.7 acres.This, combined with the small volume of waste applied, indf^cates sampling at the rate of one per acre (^ total) will 65sufficient for heavy metals testing. 0
05.2*4 Detect ion of yerj^Ical Kij;rat ion .. p
The proposed monitoring method for detecting vertical mi-gration of hazardous waste and hazardous waste constituentsunder the active portion of the land treatment facility willbe accomplished using the EP Toxicity Test results on samplestaken from the 36 inch depth.
The low levels of heavy metal concentrations indicate thisis a sufficient depth for taonitoring vertical migration ofsoluble heavy metals.
Additional systems will be designed and installed to monitorvertical migration of heavy metals if required by governingagencies -
5.3 GROl™WATER ANALYSIS . . „ - , .
5.3.1 Mon it_qr_ WellsFour monitor wells have been installed adjacent to theland treatment area. One is upgradlent and the other threedowngradient* Refer to drawings D-102 and D-124 for addi-tional information. Each veil has been installed to a depthof 30 feet below grade. Well screen is installed on thelower 15 feet,
5.3.2 Test: CharacteristicsGroundwater testing will be performed to determine thefollowing characteristics of the aquifer;
"suitability" as a drinking water"quality" of the groundwacer
f;' A, 1 aontaroinac^asi'-, of the- groundwater5.3.3 Test Paramctera tor Suitability
The parameters Co be tested in characterizing the suitabilityof the groundwater as a drinking water supply will be asfollova: , .
El &fN EARING, INC.
ArsenicBariumCadmiumChromiumFluorideLeadMercurynitratesSeleniumSilver
The "EPA interim primary drinking water standards"(refer to Appendix III in 40 CRF, Part 265) also re-quire additional testing for pesticides, radioactivity,turbidity, coliform bacteria. The water analysis ofsoils boring i?l and i?4 show that pesticides are notpresent. Radioactivity is not a problem for the Cyrilarea. Turbidity is applicable only to surface watersupplies. Colifonn bacteria are only present if tilefields from septic systems are encountered. For thisreason, these additional test items arc excluded fromthe monitoring plan.
Tegt Parameters for QualityThe parameters to be tested in establishing groundwaterquality will be as follows:
ChlorideIronManganesePhenolsSodiumSulfact
5.3^5 Tes t _Pa rajBee ers fo r Contain 1 nationThe parameters to ba eeated as indicators of groundwaterconeaiaination will bfl as follows:
Specific ConductancaTotal Organic Carbon'Total Organic Halogen
Frequency of Testing (First year)-To establish initial background ecmcenerattons or valuesfor the pas-amecers specified In paragrapha 5.3.3, 5-3.Aand 5.3.5, testing will be performed on a quarterly basisfor one (1) year at e*ch monitoring well.
Superfund AdministrativeRecord Document
"1
In addition, the testing in paragraph 5.3.5 requirethat four replicate measurements be made from each sam-ple for each parameter at each of the wells, upgradientand downgradient of the land treatment area. These rep-licate measurements will be utilized in calculating thearithmetic mean and variance of the parameters.
5-3.7 Frequency of Testing (After.First _Year)After the first year, all monitoring wells must besaaapled and the samples analyzed on an annual basis forthe parameters specified in paragraphs 5.3*3 and 5.3.4.
After the first year, all monitoring wells must besaaapled and the samples analyzed on a semi-annral basisfor the parameters specified in 5*3.5. (Note: therequirement for replicate measurements also apply tomeasurements taken during the second year)
5.3.8 Water Table ElevationEach time a sample is taken, the elevation of the ground-water surface will be determined and recorded.
5.3.9 Sampling & Testing MethodsThe procedures and techniques for: (1) sample collection,(2) sample preservation and shipment, (3) analytical pro-cedures and chain of custody control will comply withthose procedures set forth in:
Procedure^ Manual for Groundwater MonitonnfaAt Solid Haste Disposal Facilities FRE^O/SW^l^ .
Metjiod^s f o r Ch em i ca 1 Analys is oJWat G r ^nd WastesEPA-600/^-79-020. March 1979
5.^ WASTE SLUDGE ANALYSIS
Test SamplesOnly a small amount of waste has been generated by therefinery in the second quarter and to the present timein the third quarter of this year. For this reason, onlyone sample has been collected from the API Separator,Testing was performed Co determine the levels of concen-trations for heavy metals in the sludge from the APISeparator. This is displayed in Attachment 5.1.
Sou rce s of SJudgePresently sludge generated at the refinery has threeprimary sources with quantities as follows:
(a) Leaded Tank Bottoms(b) Other Tank Bottoms(c) API Separator Bottoms
2 tons/year4 tons/year3 tons/year
Superfund Administre iveRecord Document
00005^ --»*••"<•?' i~. ? -^-.^-J
S N E E R I N G , INC.
5.4.3 Test ParametersSamples from the sources listed in paragraph 5 . 4 . 2 will.be sampled and tested to determine the levels of concen-trations and values for the following parameters:
CadmiumChromiumLeadSeleniumpHOil contentTOCNitrogen content
Due to the low levels of solubility for certain traceelements in the soil matrix (after operation of the lardtreatment facility for approximately ten years) theheavy metals test list can be reduced to include onlythe above elements.
r^sQuen^y^of Testing5.4.4
Because of the low level of sludge production at therefinery, each sludge source will be tested on an annualbasis as they are generated. Perferably this testingwill take place during the spring and summer months ofthe year.
In the case of Leaded Tank Bottoois, the tirae betweentests could be quite lengthy, due Co tank cleaningrequirements.Test MethodsHeavy metals testing will conform to procedures for theEP Toxicity Test.
5.5 SUMMARY OF HONITORING PLAN
Refer to Attachment 5.2 for a summary of the categories to bemonitored, the test parameters, and the frequency of testing.
Superfund AdministrativeRecord Pooiment
SECTION 6
CLO^E & POST CLOSURE
4iThe life of any land treatment; area Is dependent upon theability of the soil to retain heavy metals in insoluble forms ^Chat are unavailable for plant uptake and are not teachable, jSoil samples will be obtained on an annual basis and tested "for t-he level of soluble heavy metals build"up within the ;zone of incorporation. —
All waste application will cease when the time for closure isreached. To ensure the complete degradation of ^il and hydro-carbons within the soil matrix, cultivation will continue.After a sufficient period of time the area will be seeded toobtain a grass cover.
POST CLOSURE MONITORING
The following will be monitored thraughout the post closure period;
o Groundw3ter-analysis to detect any migration of heavymetals from the soil matr ix above the water cable intothe aquifer.
o pH value - soil In the zone of saturation will betested to determine the lime requirements to maintainp H 2 6 . 5 .
POST CLOSURE MAINTENANCE
Maintenance of the land treatment area will consist of thefollowing activities:
o Inspection and repair of containment structures ~dikes, fences and signs, etc,
o Inspection and repair of monitoring equipment.
o Inspection and nsaint.snance (by mowing) of the rinalgrass cover on the land treatment area.
o Periodic addition of lime as indicated by teacing tomaintain pH at the appropriate levels to minimizesolubility of heavy mecals in the soil stratas,
IRK A PrtCT ft/*,/^—-- -CLOSURE & POST CLOSURE FINANCING-.:-W^
-At the appropriate tim&, ORC will provide the necessary cuaeevaluation and financial assurance for facility closure and poseclosure monitoring. All will be in accordance with the require-ffcmi-s of governing agencies and cheri regulations.ffiBSsaw*"1—1——•"
DESCRIPTIONof the
CYRIL LAND TREATMENT AREAof
OKLAHOMA REFINING COMPANYCYRIL. OKLAHOMA
rThe West 600 feet of the SW^ of the NW^ of Section 19. T5N, R9W,exclusive of the. following p'ortions of that Wea^t 600 feet:
Portion Sl - *-1"' "-",£he most westerly 33 feet, dedicated aacounty road right-of-way.Portion //2Portion //3 the most southerly 307 feet, more or less.
- the most northerly 250 feet. more or less.• of the property now remaining, the northwestcorner measuring 160 feet in an east-westdirection and 200 feet in a north-southdirection, raore of less.of the property now remaining, a triangularshaped parcel at the southwest cornermeasuring 150 in a north-south direction,326.5 feet in a south easterly direction.and 290 feet in an east-west direction.
The above described property containing 378,871 square feet or 8.7acres, more or less,
DESCRIPTIONof the
CYRIL REFINERY PROPERTYof
OKLAHOMA REFINING COMPANYCYRIL, OKLAHOMA
Attachment: 2 .3
The CyrilexclusiveSt. Louis-Oklahoma.TRACT I :
TRACT 2:
TRACT 3:
TRACT 4:
The above
Refinery property consists of the following tracts of landof the right-of-way requirements for U . S . Highway 277, theSan Francisco Railway Company and the city streets of Cyril,
The S h of the SW^ of Section 13, T5N, R9W.
The NW^ of Section 1 9 . T5N, R9W; exclusive of aparcel of land measuring 250 ft, north-south and350 ft, east-west owned by the City of Cyril.
Lots 1 , 2. 3 , 4. 5. 6 , 7, 8, 9 , 20, 21. 22, 23 and24 in Block I of the City of Cyril.
Lots 1 , 2, 3. 4, 5. 6 , 7, 8. 1 9 , 20, 21. 22, 23 and24 in Block 8 of the City of Cyril.
tracts of land representing a net acreage of 220 acres.
Attachment 4.1(1 of 5)
JAMES ft , BARNETT. Execupv O.'iM I C H A E L R MELTON. A«.«ani0<f
OKLAHOMA WATER RESOURCES BOARDPO-60X&3585 • 1000 N.£. lOTM STREET . OKLAHOMA CITY, OKLAHOMA 73152 • (4051271 -2555
, August 25. 3981
Mr. Tom Sarrett ;Nova Engineering,.Inc. , ^^•.504 N. Walnut Street ?Broken 'Arrow, Oa4J3U.. I
Rear Mr. BarretU -. . . '' i• • •••'•'• "•1" ' • " ' ; ' - \o
This better Is in response So your request for a determination as to whether ^the Nl^i of Section 19, Township 5N, Range 9WIM, Caddo County, contains any _areas identif ied as being prone to the 100-year flood.
iw'The latest o f f ic ia l Flood Hazard Boundary Map (FHBM) for unincorporated areas 0of Caddo County, OK, having an effective date of January 3. 1978, shews thatno portion of Section 19/T5N, R9W2M, lies w i t h i n the 100-year f loodplain.
If you have any questions or need any further f lood-map infomat ion , pleasefeel free to contac^^andy Zipser. Engineer ing Div i s ion , at (405) 271-2533.
Very truly yours,^ - - —fl
/-^tlHarold L . Springer, P . E .Chief, Engineering DivisionOKLAHOMA WATER RESOURCES BOARD
«-,fiERALD £. eOMELLl.Chaifn-an£AHL WALKER. V<ce-Cha<rman'
L L MALES. StCrtMry
Superfund AdinmistrativeRecord Document
0 0 0 0 6 5..^SJKEST R-,"J.w^ ' TUCKER, Mamli^
JOM?< B JAM006. Membar 'JAMfiSH NORlCK. Mflmbef
fl.G- JOMNSOM, Mtftn&BrRALPH G. MtPHEflSON. Mtinfw
80VO STEVESON. MBmbflr ,^^ " ^^a&i.-i- ^^^1 * ^
• f'!~f .•'-' ' •« ' • - •'''•
•t Attachment 4.1-•-4t )
" '"Attachment 4.1' (3 of 5)
_____^^^^^^^^asfflisaais^^
• . / , / • i •-' t/ ;
These fflaps may nof tficfude af f Special Rood Hazard Areas ;rt the communi tyAfter 3 fp.ore deEaiterf study, t he Speoaf f food Ha;ard Areas shown on thesemaps may be modtfisrf. and oEher areas added.
ConsuEt R?F(A Sefvicitig Company or (ocaf insurance agent or broker to determina.f properrissm th'scomrriL-nitv are siigibis for Hood insurance.Mfftaf irfBitification Oa t2 , *pp iL2 . t 3 7 B
i-- COMMONiTY N;i, 40&3E<i
spfciai nooo M*?if to AA(* • ?ONE * *i o£ i f r (nc*r tos o iTE: [3*rE)
0000c^00
<^• c-oysy <&^ ^^ c0 3• 3;0. 0.— • ,*^ f^^ a-11;rf& tfl:-. —t-,3 -^e-r sy<"*-"*""&"
ofwutvr o' m'yilG *"t0 USB*» OfVE'.owtuiFiilf*) knirkw* M-fn:lnh»n
rQ»N OF C Y R l l . O K( C A D O O C O . ;M A P 1 K D E X
fi* »iooa nvfD »ou«(a*'*T ut^s10 M 0 1
0 0 0 0 6 8
nil
11 ,,. . :>- •
1 1 i .t " :
Hi 'i!11"'-§i '•lt'' " -
H c-!| €. -;""" l~l•"—•lll•lt•"ll-•H ^ 'Sample ^o.ffS '.. ., >-'C*"'f.i->- •"•' •
§ 1 CB^l^y^/O6-!'H 1 /397;/l t-2 f•111 A ^ - • • - • : .% ^ CB^/Wy/O'-l.S'IH /3975/1.5 t-3'
§ CB^^SO/O'1-!'§ /3983/I'-21
§ CE^^SS^O'-l'||g ^S^/l'^*
C^^F 0/ft; /'3QC"7 f{\t I*^g^ &f f3 / j yb / /U *"i
Si /^989/1 t -2 tHWg / .3707/ i <-.
^ CB?6/3993/O t-l•gl /3992/£ l-2B
B - -
|g l) Oklahoaa^ " ' 2) Cation E^ "3} EquivaleiK ' - 0 •*) No limeill '"- • ;• ! -c • ;^S ;• i; > "cS -—•g'sgag? 'c-i ?^ .: s . • .S§i a0^ o -'5?§.
S 3^1 -". =i ^g§| 0 g sagSf. ^k fe ' . '•BB^ f^ '— ' 'l§^ " ^«- Oi
^ ' 0-——
pH
4.96.1
--- 7.16.2
6.47.4
7.56.4
5.35.7
5.15.8
State UniversityKchangs Capacitynt amount of purerequirement
AGRIC
N
1421
730
1525
22028
23,10
77
, Soil
CaCO,
HT T f T P A T <;riTT ^ULiJ,U IVVl-i Al; I tiS
PERTIUTYP
8946
3287
9670
588
fia00
48
9637
& Wacer Servi
in tons/acra,
ANAI.YSTS
(LBS/ACRK
496586
185469
406242
153433
485^FlQJL/0
385581
ces Labor
required
SW
E)Ca
33337934
67536327
73455 4 1 6
4770
36794914
29045069
ator
to
<
Attachment 4 .3 f ,' ... '" 'i ' , r -;'• " • ;;'-, \
ft \ ' •^- • •i \^ " •
™Y w -^- '\
' - !•
Lime Requirement /,^Mg (CaCO- Equiv) CEC <•/ ^-
999 3.0 , . - ' •959 0.9 : l\ . , •
[ ' ' • 1 ' L - ^ ' \999 * ^999 0,6 - ' .
999 . 0.2 ' : ' .999 • * - .' • •
999 *-0.2 :- ;' ,
Q 0 /, 1 ^ •GO" ^.-i
999 1.6 ,.. .
557 2.6999 1 . 4 . .:• ^ " -% *••• s., .•&,' ' • - . - , : - '
^{fw^v; S t illwacer, Oklahoma
raise soil pHS6.5 •.'''^'•3> ;' ~ • • "•^yr. . - • < ( , :- .—{u ... .-^m -^ fi>s
t-r^L^>
0 0 0 0 7 1
1<0
SOIL and WAT^R SERVICE LABORATORYAGRONOMY DEPARTMENT
OiL TEST REPORT NO. 13&2 A
ADDRESS C-.tii'.. ry ^ x r f^S *P\ 'J Ii<E;(:7ff^
OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITYCOOPERATIVE EXTENSION SERVIC^STILLWATER. OKLAHOMA 74078
COUNTY CLEVELAND
DATE REC£iVED._07/_7_/flJ_ DATE RESULTS RgPQRTED ^ 7 / . 3 l / f J t ,LOCAT(ON,
;--^-r"-
IU0
>•
£ w
t £ &t/)
V>
'*. CC
y,
*-
^J§^0
::) iS I
LU
1"
<t-
X .J
< m ^
*- ...
0CO
l" ,
- >
c:
< t-
U
J5 <
t-
0 o: <
1 ^ ^
<
DL -'
.J 0
-J
*f 0
0 0
W
>"
or0t-<cc0C
D<^h-
01 -y
U1—
01^>
S
Sh
;U
JC
C</) <
n- n-
£st-Q0^s-0°
c
-2.
^o
^rco
y03 <
' u \\ \
\It
</
*,
'*
IMM
a'•<i
-J• 'J>U
J~JU>
-t-<^r>00X3k-
iJi-JK^1—>
/*/X>•
»—&,
».)VI
trtU
JccQ0<LU5;
<2
1}
z01-
<^J
•—<
•^h.0UJ
>-
e0£LHi
e<••;^-
^JDti
UJ
&;
UJ
l-<C3^f^S,
r.
00UJ
SUJ
0LUK.
UJ
fr-<?:0
^Ul3£IK"^g0xU
Jazt-tnLJt--J -
0V)
<Z
So
-1Z
2o—u<<1£J—(flLI
C.
UJ0aUJU)
^1-^V)
'*5
tS E
H
^M
3 at<nw<
JU
>-<J»-=;*«
(fl
Q•^it
<°-
Ul
-"^it
<s
ECt
QCDFGC;|t1^ ;
",
„4
^--.
-*J
^~
la
TI~~^~5
^al
'-iU
f-<5
^•n'
^
C-0JQ
.mw
^—
.
a: ^1
M
0•
ffl f-^
£ ^^
^LU
t^J
e"
Q- w
^£
1' 1
<IA<
0
0Z
ftt
B
^<
K 1
'ag
LS
Sw
rVa
^
d
'w/m
sS
ooy
fffM
iM
^1;iii)i
in'Z.0^<»-UJCCD
.Q
;tUt-z.•-.
s%a.-5.fffi;
^1
SrP
FaS
S1"?
^SisB.i-0:
0Ul
<n m
</l
UJ
CC:0<uN0)
Q-JLULL
B^^
l(T
ilfc^s im
tff i
^5^1
^^^^10A
l
^
tf-
^ °
5
a->-t-
01
w
•r<
z
2
-J
, -1
CL
<:
<0
S "
^
CC CD
00
-1
h-
&B
£^Z
WW
i lV
MiS
%sW
EFE
lKje
RS
L^U
le" ic
f a5b2&
(iifWifZ
Jrfc
mf—
irUJ
.K T
* •• i
^^^^^K
1
Atta
ch
me
nt
^.3
(4
o
f 1
2)
£<ia
0^
^0
«-?
0^,
g^
•Z. o
o e
MX(B
/E
<!'£
u. ^0
£
to *:
1^. \-
0
a,
§1
S"n
i re
uf £
2
^Z
^ S
.0
y-
w</l
0
&• (fl
<ulL
i 0
E
^
z
£
B 81OT
Q-
"
^
^
•
lU6
UJ >
e
^
0 E
m
S 0
(0
< £
0
in £
p
^
">
g 3^^ §^£
in u
-Z tU 0
0
o
U °
IL
^ ^°
=- 2U
. (^
fLJI^
Q^
2-0
<aUJ
d> ^
0 (~
(0 <
< 0
.
Z Q
? 5
0
,I
<
" 0 .
(0 0
§ q
"' u/
S >'
•
^s
m
'X
•z »—
:'\
,
<" s
^
•
h- 0
"
1 ^ duperfund Adm
inistrati§ ^
Record Documsnt
A u.
>- UJ
& Q
"
00
00
sS
t
inr-000c•»aui
:Urf»
t*t /•
/5
t-0u-y-*-i
^JU
SOIL TEST REPORT^ U 'J 0 . e
SOIL and WATER SERVtCE LABORATORYAGRONOMY DEPARTMENT
DATE RECEIVED 07/ >7/bl
ADDRESS __r';aft,rY c. :gTlN;.riN Lt IKECTUFt COUMY'_£^yfLLA5p^__^J_l
DATE RESULTS REPORTED 1LM/±1______LOCATION.
rATF t <pf'JnpR<.AB NO- {SAMPLE NO,
?.'S^&Aj 3980—————i——————I
soiLaePH
6 > <
ACTIOMe f .
7 . S
L8SNO
SUR
i K
,/A-N
SUB P Lb/A
<-^. . .. .
K Lh /A
4 0 f J
S O I LCa Lb/A
/r ^ 4 :;
, T E S T I NMQ Lti /A
^ t^- - r l ^ l .
D E XFe pf>'n ^'n (iprn Mn pom
11 i n
8 OD^ORGAN tCMArTER
'<SANOt
TSH.T
».
^ K T U M ECLAY
% CLASS
————————1ffl
RECOMMENDATfOlstS BY EXTENSION PERSONNEL't. ^PPtY NUTRfEl^TS fN AMOUNTS SHOWN ABOVE
IS DEFICIENT FOR THE YiELO GOAL ENDiCATED. OP THE DEFtCtENCtES fNOICATED ABOVE. __ POUNDS OF N.__ POUNDS OF P,0». __ POUNDS OF K,0AND—— TONS OF ECCE LIME are the ffFrufnum reauiremenis for &stabtishment and the maximum for ACP COST SHARING
Hi
0
. > ^
>•
o;
e?^ s s(rt
(0 ^
/r- t'~
^<
^o
3 5
x
tU t-
<1-
X -J
<
UJ
$$t-
in °
05 l"
-
- 5
tr
5 <
h-
0 a:
<X l"
S
< -i
-J 0
-1^ 0
F0 0
(/l
>££0t-<0:
003<-'h
-o) z
OU
J
>§
cc
•U
J 0=
(fl <0-: Q
-U
l^
i^Q
<>
-
5:5
-o
OC
•Z
."o
-J o
r
OS
t/l <,
032«^uJ>^J>J>-
t-Z^00^/
3»-0s'£.£^•e-^f
se^>^~2.3J'
UC/>(/;LLJ(TGC<u.*<1
0fr-<00-J
#-t
N.
•Sf-0UJ
^gIL,
a.
m»—-J—~
(7UJQ:
UJ
\-<0s.
N,
h-s»t^0C»*,
uGLJLa
i
t-(
0s,
c
6P^
^J>JJLJJ£3
"Si3
ffv«h3<n<»<i<J
S*'
U^*<
Vl0s*-
(0
^n-
^ u.
Zu
*< h f
g^
§=
£cacE£c2£
^
^^ -
2 ^
rt —
-i. o.
>- 5
5 <
/i -;-.1«u*fc.J•<3n.a
:3
^^
w
tOQ
-^0
-U
Z0 -
t- 03
U4UJK-1 X
0
a-(/l"9
(E^
UJ U
Ja
.*
a£
LU «*(ft ftU
l
tu0
h. Z
5°
£»
< 'sssW
H&
ZQ
5i
h-^0-
*-•
1'-'
(;''•
^V-
C3C^
f^"ac'
f 1-.3
f^^5!
lfta^&
« ib
XIff^
^
OTZ0t—<:>—uCl:&{£U
Jt—2
liS^yS
SJS
^ iQ
mS
SS
^
iill'i
i@
ii jja!§
ll 0?
lly^y^w
S
y?S
Si^
(0UJa:
^
0.
it:h-
*J1
a:
0<
n"
UJ
CC >-
.-
-
iy W
fe'
U
N'
fc
.h- 2
—— '%
?'*
•JP
-(flJ
;J^O
<?-
Q1
&-
<(
.</
^
iT'i
S
<n
^U
J
UJ
tt: CO
C
(n
UL 0
-J
t-
,
k
\
ydJ0'
s
A(0:u-0(n0z30Q-ca.u.0tn0gCa
—i
UJ
^
^
g
^0:
yid r
Q-
JZ ;
0
Ctfl
a
z111t-, '--
11 ^
>
cffl
0:y)
<z r
g!!!5i v
-i u
0
Lu
2
^
^uUCu3t-<U-^a<253(lt/t"«u^iQS.t;( ^P
?
teat'vQ
&S
WSo
Ltta
ch
7
of
02(T<I01
-§U0.(J<0i-3Eyni„ E4)•C§i£f0'0s£-
0
1
> ^l
a>3
£;
®3 -S5
C(U1c
il3,"- ai
^^= UJ1 0lu; UJ?
u-iio
3-
^u- Ql. 2-3
<as 0^a
<< uS
0?
z
^o 0
A 0,
0
i"11n a:
0 0
z ii-
J 1-
r Z
E
UJ3 u
s £
^
UJ
• 0
^ "
tfN
rW
^
'•».«
'
men
12
)S.u
perfu
nd
Adm
inis
trativ
e
Record
Docum
ent
NO. 1 3^ A
f -^ SOIL. and WATER SERVICE LABORATORYv AGRONOMY DEPARTMENT
OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITYCOOPERATIVE EXTENSION SERVICESTILE-WATER. OKLAHOMA 74078
:,. NAME
DATE RECEIVED 07^ T^i
ADDRESS__r.UMY r. XU'M'.^H MJ tH LCTOR COUNTY CL^VJiLAMD
DATE RESULTS RPPOnTFO I/^l./U_______LOCATION,
FATEB !VQ
SENDERSSAMPLE NO
SOILREACTIOMPM B.t ,
'2 7 • <?
L8S/AMO.I-N
SUR. S'JB
SOIL TEST tNDEXP Lt>/A K Ib/A Ca Lb/A Mg Lh/A Fe ppm Zn ppm Mr, ppm B ppm
INTERPRETATIONS:
PlY NUTRtENTS tN AMOUNTS SHOWN ABOVEDEFICIENT FOR THE YIELD GOAL INDICATED D
W
•as^aw ^§ §s. Q.
RECO^MENRATfONS BY EXTENSION PERSONNEL
OF THE DEFICIENCIES INDICATED ABOVE, ... POUNDS OF N, _,. POUNDS OF P,0»._. POUNDS OF K,,0AND. ... TONS OF" ECCE LtME are She minimum requirement;, for establish mf-m and the maximum tor ACP COST SHAFtiNG
o >o*^.o 3§1
§§.
^<' iUC3'-
-0L
Ci.;t'i\t1 COPY
us<
°
<? >- §
S?* '
t-ui £ -
^
(0 0)
-»
^1^
CC 7
li-
^uj ^
<t
<
^ ^
-•
2^
0
•J
:3 2
•=' >
0
-"tii ^
UJ^
IU
>-
<
i
<
UJ ^
1^
t- III °
(n ^
-
^-< ~
£:
$
h- LU
^5
<:
^
.20
o: <
=>T
ui S
0
< Q- -*
US
o-.
^ 0
?=.
0 0
w
0:3t"UJ
•*-*
^>'»
••'•-•I
/I
}~rr"LL»
l-
0 '
S^^
>—
Q-
^LU
S
Q:
^—'h-
/• (
t^^3
^
LAJ cc
i
Q
^
§—
J
0CO
>-(T?<(E0CO<:••"h-
11J 2:O
oi
?5
^t?
UJ
<:c
05 <
1 fl-
(:)-
;
t— U
J
^0
<>-s:^
- ?
§^0
^g
^0
^
^W <
2
-,: ^.-t. . •i. t^
i i* \
» ...((.>
•'. - i
20t-<-J
•d'S?s,3QLUh-0:
0Q,
0:
W1-3Ul
UJC:
UJ
1-<0M•sf^.
'S?'•0QLU^U
JCJU
JIE;LU»-•<1^
uf^<JUt-Ct/<0:C?C<aCvL(11>•»-L BK-^Cfl
OTlU
Ul
>-
UJ
^^
(/l
Q^W
"tt
Z U
J<
^- K"S
(2$
O2eD&01Ea.a5ea.C1^1
Z <
/i -i
U
d-
5
5 <
n 5vU<-C<3-Ja.CO
tZ"
^0^n
:Ci-l
y3: 03
JCLfJ T
^ °'
^0
a: 2'UJ U
JQ
-J?
£:
JJ-f
1ft <i
'e\
^6
S-2-<^
/!<
-i
.
^
••
w^J*
t
——
»».
'»
f0a'T-,-;n•f.«tf;fr-'0C'-^{-.ven
fi^S
^SE
^^•.p
iip^^
^
.——
—^-—
^—i
.---.^^.--.-..
.
<0z0>—<inS;0:U
l
z
a?8JUfJ
^•KK
.t-0:
UUJ
W
^^
ES^SBB'T'i^
s^St
'•.flKS
Sa
V)
UJ
0:
U<
D:
<UJ>
uj
Eny
<CO
-)
Q
0--i
0UJ
a;
u- 0 ^
B,i
|ciHtgra
J£ IL
ffiR^ffS
0^^1d"Q-
^Z
^
^
OT(n
203
0-J
t- ^
^^f^
^W
^^^^
mw
siM
T?^s& a^ssr^ ^1
^J^
ii)
9^
Atta
chm
en
t ^.3
(9 o
f 12)
u20:<z01
O.to
•^0u. U
°&
§^
Z o
3 ":
o e°-1xffi
-E
(!:£
"-• ?
o S
w •;
/*• c
§1
0 t"
0- 5<cri
gi zo0
U
- 'r-
<n 0
^C
c/i
a;LJ
o e
^
=> 50
0
fy(A
°- £
m
c
^
ID E
UJ
>
C>
o em
S ®w
< c21
0 -
0
-ij £--
t-
(Q
•(
<>
li
o
(J 5Z
"=
ilu
:z
U
J
^ "^
^
tu U
0 „
luU u
u.^
go
U "
••' zu- ,-i^0
UJ '
Z
1>-
Q
^ 2
0 <n
in a^
ui
0 »-
03 <
< U
20
5 S?i
<M
060 0
^3
-L
kJ
2 •'-'
§>-
1^
^ g Superfund Adm
inistra5 ^
Record Document
£ a2 "^
—
..
.
> u1
^ S\ /\ A
0a^ °
,
U I? V
(/' 0t^
(0
'' "
' '
-f <:
F*0
•'fc
^
a3rtlr-0:
Cccnwr
3«0wtiv0
>c0-^ULJ
ZJU
bUSL i£b! Hb^UKi NO- I - . SOIL and WATER SERVICE LABORATORY OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVE^ AGRONOMY DEPARTMENT COOPERATIVE EXTENSiO"'" STILLWATER, OKLAHOMA
-'- NAME_____________________________________ ADDRESS P-l^ry t. '< f f f j ^ J ^N tj f^HCTOt; COUNTY CtHV6:t-J
DATE RECEIVED ^^-l7/-!1______________» OATF RFSUl TS REPORTED _•>Z.<.IL/^-T_______LOCATiON____________
S ^ Y E : ] S £ ^ t O E R s 7 S O I L R E A C T l o ^ l t ^ B S . / A [ ___~Z_ ,, ^ SO I L TEST iNDEX _ __ ~ IbR'aft l ' T, ^ _ TE XTU RE ' "> A 8 NO SAMPLE NO. PM B l SU^0'^0 p Lb/A K Lb/A Ca Ll>/A Mf] Lt>/A F e p p m | z n p p m Mn wm Boom MA^TER ^W S^T Ct^V ^^3
•^i.;^»A 390^ ''»?' 6.^ 1 0 4 - ' ^t ' / -) ^ *U 4! 4^'* i
I__________\______________J I______________1 1 I t I [ \ I . I 1______.______INTERPRETATIONS i————————(————————i
1
It(t
————————I————————
SEC.____R_____ T_____
FIELD StZE________ACRES
CROP LAST YEAR________
LBS./A.N___ P,0,__KO__£ ' £
TONS LIME ____________
RECOMMENDATIONS BY EXTENSION PERSONNEL
\PPLY NUTRIENTS fH AMOUNTS SHOWN ABOVE QF THE DEFtClENClES INDICATED ABOVE,.._ POUNDS OF N, __ POUNDS OF P,0i, __ POUNDS OF K/0\SD£F)CtENT FOR THE YtELD GOAL INDICATED a AND-__ TONSOFECCE t.lME are Ihe minimum requiremenis for establishment and the ma'(imun-, tor ACP COST SHARING 'At >>—• rr
o n-fi]o n>-h g'
fr~' n?£/) N13C s_/ r<T3- =0 s •>
fr. " *
S cT ^^ §0 Q.Q.
-^ oJ> "•sw' o 0-0 c d.0 § Hoo • = sr •• - • '• _________________" y^- C» . . • Sig^AtureJ"-:___£:____________________________nno O R 1____________
c& CL i rNTCOS-Y
I*
""' SOIL and WATER SERVICE LABORATORY^ AGRONOMY DEPARTMENT
MAM£
DATE RECEtVED Q7/.-7/61
NO.
OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVER' hY'TCOOPERATIVE EXTENSION SERVIC^ \ST.LLWATER. OKLAHOMA' 7W8 .;•
ADDRESS C^Uf i iTY F X T t ^ '•. f ' > rJ IHR SrCTtJP COUNTY C L^VKLANi) ^-
PATE RESULTS REPORTED IfJ.^L^l________LOCATION.
STATEAB W
'Ift.^ilA
SENOEP'SSAMPLE HO,
39^
SOtLRSPM
S.I
ACTION8 1
r*^
L8SNO
suft
7
{A.-M
SU9 P Lb/A
<) t
K Lb/A
.(rt ••;
sonCa LOi'A
** 0 0 4
TEST INMg L&/A
^'•r
^EXPe opr-i 2n ppm Mn fipm a &om
OROANICMATTER
tSAND
X
TSILT
%
EXTURRCLAVI CLASS
yP.WbUOS TAfH-
^
%ft£
^INTERPRETATIONS
RECOMMENDATIONS BY EXTENSION PERSONNEl.-
OF THE DEFICIENCIES INDICATED ABOVE.__ POUNDS OP N,-__ POUNDS OP PA.__ POUNDS OF K;0AND__ TONS OF ECCE LtME are the minimum require merits for establishment anci ths maximum EorACPCQ^T ShARING
^PPLY NUTRIENTS IN /.\.OL?NTS SHOWN ABOVEAS DEPtClc-NT FOR THE YiELD GOAL INDICATED D
IGfAt . CHflHGf:
£ftT3
332ni .o c-*^ §0 Q-
^?Og-3 §•^ ^•.-S -s<"»• Q)! g^
(& ,0^-0 8 2
NO.
SOIL and WATER SERVICE LABORATORYAGRONOMY DEPARTMENT
NAME
DATE RECCIVED 07 / '7/h 1
OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITYCOOPERATIVE EXTENSION SERVICESTiLLWATER. OKLAHOMA 74076
ADDRESS _C'tlNTY _ r. X T t •M f> N LYt^fcCn^ COUNTY . CL£1VLLAN6
.LOCATIONDATE RESULTS REPORTED .OT/.-.V/.^1.
STATSAS ftiO
dd.^A
SENDERSSAMPLE ft.0
399?
SOIL REPM
f<t!
ACTION
8i
7 . C
L8SNO
SUR
7
,/A-N
SUB P Lh/A
3 1
K LEI/A
<1 ^ I
SOIL
Ca Lti'A
E) P '•
TEST W
Mg L.h/A
^y ,'
0£X
Fr Hpnk ^n ppm Mn ppmr————
S (lorn
ORGAMCMATTER
%SAND
%
TPtLTt
EXTURECLA'I'
% CLA^S
SEC.____R.
FIELD SfZE_
CROP LAST Y E A R
LBS/A.N___s^O,.
TONS LIME
?PL'<' NUTRtENTS (^ AMOUNTS SHOWN ABOVES DEFICIENT FOR THE YIELD GOAL tNDlCAl 60 G
1/1
^fll
^ ^a. •"ftci c-o •-^ v^
RECOMMENOATtONS SY E X T E N
OF THE DF.FICSENCfES tND'CATED ABOVE.^^AND TONS OF ECCE L I M E are Ihe minimum
SIO
POlrequ
^ PERSONNE
f N O S O F N ,cements fores
POlfNOSOFF,0tabtishment and the
»•—ma
POUNDS OF K,0ximum lor ACP COST SHARING
s^^^^^^si^*sSK'£5sSh£?9^
frsi r-T IKetB^'t^Sfit SMSS^0 0 ^%^§' 1 y ^wE'dE-1^5 ^^^
?%sfp.
10000-9&-Cil
£>
1*1
1S- r :L ] lN ' f COE'V
^E——NBB 3TEIE^^ B
;SL^NT: ^
; 501; Brc
An3U8JECT: ^
, Sampt£Identificc
^1 0-1H 1-S^1 2-:n 3-^^2 0-3i?2 1 . ^^2 3^
iS'3 0-3«i3 1-2i?3 2-:n 3-4
^4 0-1^4 1-2•?4 2-3i?4 3-4
i?5 0-1^5 1-2^5 2-:^5 3-4
#6 0-1i?6 1-2#6 2-2j?6 3-4
; ; ' ,,'
JOLEirERSANOttNTlpAL OR Sfc*»
58
t/a Enqi5 N. Wa3ken AyFN: To
\na1ysi
a
ation
L?i1 . 53-3
I
?ii
5ii3
i\
??t
REPORTSLARPflCKXJ
ne^InTOffl
s
APPJCT
«i
eringutw, OKBarrett
of Soil
Arse
3.3.2.5.
3.<l.
2.
7.3.3.
<!.
3.2.2-3.
3.3-4.
<!.
3.2.3.
<!.
IV ONLV TOS
^."Sory
74012
Samp'
me
4640
507
1490
I579
3000
1930
'-"'^ .-'i.,.
TMfcSAM
ferns ft
S871
es for
•
Ban
70858079
675969
84786273
77838279
68286968
50987970
^w^
Pt£ t£STE
Fie Wee(
(
i
u
,.•
,-
a.'
,,•
.,•
,,
0
^
3Ut6 E.
Haza
m
^215
984
5130
0416
9713
1500
^
AND
S Of
Atr(1
hwest L<43rd/Tulsa,
irdous Mater
ResultsCadmium
7.54.75.0
<.5
< .5< - 5<.5
4.72.42.22.3
4.32.32.32.5
2.52.4
<0.5<0.5
5.07.44.92.5
SouthvQV ^^B^
Wti Wt NECESS^
ffte PfsSfGtenif
acnm< 1 4 . 4of 4)"
aboratorOklahoma '
NUMBE
August
-ials
(ug/g)Chromium
4056.850.150.0
53.439.949.6
26359.049.068.4
42.846.363.849.8
49.252.654.343.9
40.1543950
vestjgborc
fLV INDICATIVE OF
nSiWfUStfv*'
tL 1- --
f\UGy of OkSs74145/(918)
R 1396-A20, 1981
Copper
12.511 .812 .59.9
1 2 . 110.012 .4
18.816.127.153.4
14.11 1 . 61 1 . 416 .4
16.219.112.316.1
16.519 .716.320.0
Superfund AcRecord DC
atc^^pkj(•^y ~^
^/^H^^
TH£ QUAUTfES OF..' ffiV.'.;W
2 : 1SSI
ihoma665-0680
Lead
<25<24< 25<25
< 2450
< 25
944945
<23
43<23< 23< 25
< 2 5< 24<25
49
<2599
<25<25
mmistrativ??cument
ihbma
APPAnENTfYfi--:.^--A
ou»
. - . - . „ . . - . ... -^W-arhmpnr- A A *
^ ii8i ^ \ k o f 4 )ww H^ P Southwest Laboratory of Oklahoma
8716 E. 43rd/Tulsa. Oklahoma 74145/(918)665-0680
CLIENT: Nova Engineering NUMBER 1396-A504 h. WalnutBroken Arrow, OK 74012 ^9° ?-ATTN: Tofn Barrett
SUBJECT: Analysis of Soil Samples for Hazardous Materials
Sample • Results (ug/g)Identification Mercury Nickel Selenium Silver Zinc
n 0-1 .15 15 5.0 6.0 21.6ffl 1-2 .14 14.2 <2 .4 3.8 24.6n 2-3 .15 25.0 7.0 4.0 17.5H 3-4 <.05 9.9 5.0 4.0 17.4
n 0-1.5 ,19 9.7 7.3 3.9 27.6^2 1.5-3 .16 10.0 7.0 6.0 27.4j?2 3-4 .15 9.9 <2.5 7.9 28.7
ff3 0-1 <.05 14.1 <2 .3 5.6 326^3 1-2 <.05 24.4 <2.4 5.9 17.6ii'3 2-3 0.10 22.2 < 2.2 < 2.2 12.5^3 3-4 .10 22.8 4.6 3.6 26.5
K 0-1 .10 17.1 6.4 5.1 22.3^4 1-2 <.05 18.5 <2 .3 2.3 24.6^4 2-3 .10 9.1 < 2.3 3.6 24,6^4 3-4 .10 14.9 8.9 6.0 23.9
i?5 0-1 .15 14.8 9.8 <2 .5 31.0^5 1-2 .14 14.3 2.9 3.8 28.7^5 2-3 .14 9.9 3.5 4.0 24.2#5 3-4 .16 29.2 9.8 <2.4 20.5
^ 0-1 .11 20.0 10.0 4.0 23.6^6 1-2 .10 9.9 9.4 <2 .5 38.4^6 2-3 .12 19.7 < 2.5 <2.5 27.6#6 3-4 .12 15.0 3.0 <2.5 28.5
Superfund AdministrativeRecord Document
' - - Southwes^^oratory^fpklatprfaRy,/^y%-^ ^^^ i '2-
tD£M
^^ ~l^^r<Ktft LETTEflS AM) S£POnrS *PPtV ONLV TO Tn£ SAMPLE IFfSTeo AND AflE NOT NECeSSAflt.V KCMCArtVE OF THE OUAirTeq OF APPAflPMn VtOiENTtCAL On SWiLAR PflOOUCTS --^.'^.^'--^r^'-Wi.
1————————————^-."Serwc/'flg ?0 Mesris of^ Petroieum tndustfy**'—^—3g?^5^%^^^g6§^^,^i
'»
i
<
wsss
• Attachmeiii: 4.4(3 of 4)
Southwest Laboratory of Oklahoma8716 E. 43rd/Tufsa, Oklahoma 74145/(918)665-0680
CLIENT: Nova Engineering504 N. WalnutBroken Arrow, OK 74012ATTN: Tom Barrett
NUMBER
IPage 31396-A
SUBJECT: Analysis of Soil Samples for Hazardous Materials
SarnpleIdent i f icat ion
?1 0-1^1 1-2H 2-3
3-4
?2 0-1.5S2 1.5-3i2 3-4
^3 0-153 1-2^3 2-3^3 3-4
54 0-1H 1-2ff4 2-3^4 3-4
^5 0-1^5 1-2^5 2-3^5 3-4
^6 0-1^6 1-2^6 2-3^6 3-4
PH@ 25
5.76 . 16 . 36 . 75.76 . 67.48.86 . 27.56 . 87.36 . 86 . 37 . 16 . 86 . 76 . 56 . 85 . 96 . 16 . 26 . 3
Oil
.(".g/91430474448624
8753,015
200
25,991266254
3,087
1,790172393318
29597
696434
360660561863
T . O . C(Wt %.63.40.28.28.60.56.6 16.88. 2 6.20.65.70.48.32.18.52.47.50.51.75.58.64.59
,, - - Jm.'rHstratitfeword Document
f Oklahoma
OUR LETTERS AMD RfcPOflTS AWLY ONLY TO THE SAMPLE TESTED AMD AHE NOT NECESSARILY INOlCA]TtV£ OF THE QUAUTlES OF APPARENTLY10£NrK;Ai. OR S»HLAfl PflODyCTS
Servicing the Needs of the Petroleum Industryff————————————
Attachment 4 .4(4 of 4)
Southwest Laboratory of Oklahoma8716 E. 43rd/Tulsa, Oklahoma 74145/(918)665-0680
ANALYTICAL NOTES TO REPORT ^1396
Soil Samples were analyzed by digesting approximately2 grams of sample in Aqua Regia. The digestions were fil-tered and diluted to 100 nnlliliters with deionized water.All analysis except Chlorides, Nitrates. Arsenic, Oil, pH,and T.O.C. were performed on this material.
Oil was determined by Methylene Chloride extraction ofa known weight of soil." The methylene chloride extractswere filtered and evaporated. The residue was weighed andreported as oil present in the samples.
Chlorides and Nitrates were determined by Sulfun'c Acid(3 %) digestion of approximately lOg of soil. This was fil-tered and diluted to 100 milliliters with deionized water foranalysis.
Arsenic was determined by a Sulfuric Acid (50 %} diges-tion of approximately Ig of soil. This was filtered anddiluted to 100 nnlliliters with deionized water for analysis.
pH of soil was determined by mixing 50 nnlliliters ofdeionized water with 5g of soil. After mixing for 5 minutesthe pH of the water was recorded.
Because of incomplete solubility of Silicon in AquaRegia, the silicon values may be lower than actual siliconpresent in the soil samples.
Record Document
000087
*
( ) ) AtCachfflenC 4 .5 LR.P. TOXTCITY EXTRACTION SWtARY
SAMPLE ID. Ar Ba Cd Cr Cu Pb Hg Mi Se Ag Zn
Results in mg/1
CB^I - O'ta 1 ' .03 < .1 <.05 .09 <05 < .5 .0008 <.05 .018 <.05 .20" I 'Co V .06 < .1 <.05 < .05 <.05 <.5 .0005 .10 .028 <.05 <.05
CB(?2 - O'to 1.5" .019 < .05 < .05 .10 <.05 <\5 .0026 <:,10 .20 < .OI :: .06"1.5' Co 3' .06 < . l < .05 <.05 < .05 < . 5 .0009 .10 .014 < .05 <.05
C B ^ S - O ' C o l * .21 .6 .15 .90 .10 <.5 .0004 .60 .128 .05 8.99" 1 ' c o 2 ' , .03 < . I <'.05 <.05 <.05 < .5 .0002 <.05 .004 <.05 < .05
CB^4 - 0' Co I * .12 < .1 .21 .60 .13 <.5 .0006 .50 .040 .05 9.86- 1' to 21 .03 < .1 <'.05 <.05 <.05 < . 5 .0004 <.05 .054 <.05 < .05
CS^5 - 0' Co I1 , .06 < .! < .05 <.05 <.05 <.5 .0004 <.05 .002 < .05 < .05- I 9 £0 2* '.06 < .1 <: .05 <.05 <.05 <.5 .0003 .20 .004 <.05 < .05
CBf?6 - O* to 3 ' , .08 <'.! ^.05 .09 . 1 0 <.5 .0014 < .05 .014 <^.05 .20- I 1 to 21 \0l5 <.05 <.05 .10 .05 < . 5 .0007 < .10 .200 < .01 .08
J
(1) Southwest Laboratories of Oklahoma , ^
•-; rrw • - ^C 2.•CT • ».-1 •CT
^1 • .1o 5 •••-^ TT3,0. •U;"^-o 5?* u»<p 0. - - •'-d ac 3.3 :3
S^ i "^ ^ 0 0 0 0 8 8
Attachment ^.5(1 ^12)
/...
Southwest Laboratory of Oklahoma
CLIENT: Nova Engineering504 N. WalnutBroken Arrow, OK 74012ATTN: Tan Barrett
8716 E, 43r.j/Tulsa. Oklahoma 74145/(918)665-0680
NUMBER 1420
August 31, 1981
SUBJECT: E.P. Toxicity Extractions of Soil Samples
Sample identification: H 0-1
PARAMETER
ArsenicBariumCadmiumChromiumCopperLeadMercuryNickelSeleniumSilverZinc
RESULTS (mq/n
.03< .1<.05
.09<.05< . 5
.0008<.05.018<.05
.20
Superfund AdministrRecord Docunnen
oya Lenefls wo REPORTS APPLY ONLY TO THE SAMPLE TESTED AND ARE NOT NECESSARILY tNOtCAnve OF THE Qi'AiiTtf'i DF AppAflpMn vBXNTtCAL OH SUfLW PROOUCfS ' "'-•-""•-^•1.1
^Servicing ihe NeQds of the Petroleum /ndustry"^-____^____»™
- ®® BSS S .riffle n ^^chment 4 5wwllai® "^~"———---------^^ of n«
8^^s:=^^3UENT: p^f^- 680
Ant" r^eV4012tt ^"st 31, i98i j
UBJECT: E.P. Toxicity Extr-..- - • • • •^Extractions of So,? samples
• Sample Identification: n \
PARAMETER I
^ RKlmdw, ;Cadmium .06 IChromium <.l | iCopper <.05Lead < 05 IMercury <.05Nickel < .5 |selenl'um .0005 /Silver . 10zlnc .028
<.05<.05 |
^ss '"^"ecord Documenf
0000^0Southwp^t i ]
.^orat^ofoki^oma'W^-^^^^^ B^——^^^^<_____, D <RE B'or NE^^" ^ o, ,l?<*•? - •.™-*- — -*<?-.-...• - '""IVE OF rw niiA....,- -_ I
- •••"———————————•'•"—"—'——, j——| ^ Attachment 4 .5
a^a §|§IB| a ^^ (3 of 12) - 'fH^BBk B>*"BBBff B IHH^ BI ^KS^^B
wp ww ww ^vy Southwest Laboratory of Oklahoma8716 E. 43rd/Tulsa. Oklahoma 74145/(918)665-0680
CUENT: "ova Engineering NUMBER 1398-A504 N. Walnut c . . o inoiBroken Arrow, OK 74012 September 8, 1981ATTN: Tom Barrett : ,
SUBJECT: E.P- Toxicity Extract-ions of Soil Samples , .
Sample Identification: i?2 0-1.5((
PARAMETER RE SUITS Jmg/1) <Arsenic .019 <
Barium <-05 <Cadm-ium <.05Chromium ,10Copper <.05Lead <,50Mercury .0026Nickel < . 1Selenium .20Silver <.01Zinc .06
Superfund Administrati ?eRecord Document
000091
Southwestj-aborato-ry^of Oklahoma
^ S SSIT J S1'' ONtv Torfrle W^^^ w ttMm^ INDlCAriVE OF TNR QUAL^ . ^N^Y ^
—-——————-————————————^^T~~l Attachme^ ^.5
^"BBBi A ( 4 0 £ 1 2 / ':"^ "^W 9W mm W Southwest Laboratory of Okiahoma8716 £. 43rd/Tulsa, Oklahoma 74145/(918»665-0680
CUENT: Nova Engineering NUMBER 1422504 FL Walnut , , ^ ,981Broken Arrow, OK 74012 August J1'1901
AHN: Tom Barrett
SUBJECT: E.P. Toxicity Extractions of Soil Samples
Sample Identification: #2 1.5-3 CM
PARAMETER RESULTS (mg/1) ^
Arsenic .06 0Banum ^ -1 ^Cadmiutn '^•05 0Chromium <.05Copper <-05Lead < -5Mercury .0009Nickel ^OSelenium •014Silver <-05Zinc <-05
Superfund Admsnistrativ 3Record Document
oooor^
• . SQuthwest^boratQE^oJ O lahonia
OUR (JETTEftS AND REPORTS APPtV ONLV TO TH6 SAMPLE TESTED AND ARE NOT NRCESSARltY INDICATIVE OF THE QUALITIES OF APPARENTLYIDENTICAL OR SIMILAR PRODUCTS
i
___________________^ _ Actachni^AC ^.5[ - — — — " ' - "Pi ( 5 o f 0Mi BBI I A l
!BB^ W® w® F Southwest Laboratory of Oklahoma; 8716 E. 43rd/Tufsa. Oklahoma 74145/(918)665-0680ti
CUENT: Nova Engineenng NUMBER 1423504 N. Walnut ^ ^ Broken Arrow, OK 74012 w
: ATTN: Tom Barretti
SUBJECT: E.P. Toxi'city Extractions of Soil Samples
^Sample Ident i f ica t ion; ff3 0-1
CPARAMETER RESUlTSJii.g/'I) C
CArsenic .11 ^Bariuni .6Cadnnum .15Chromium .90Copper - 1 0Lead < - 5Mercury .0004Nickel .60Selenium .128Silver .05Zinc 8.99
Superfund Administr itiveRecord Oocumen:
0 0 0 0 9 3
. . SouthwestLaborator^y Oklahpma^S'~— ^-^'/^ 'i^^
^^^^^--^^^^^^
in UETTEnS AND REPORTS AFfLV CWl-Y 10 THE SAyPifc rESTED ANO AflE NOr NECESSASHY INQIfcAirve OF TMg QUALITIES OF APPARENTl.YENTICAL Ofl SW^Afl PRODUCTS - " '
Attachment ^.5__^—————————————————————™ ^ ^^,
tf^B ffiM&iE§ Bi J^Sjte ' '•'%.—' 11-':• "ili : 1 ,WttSH gSHBffig Hgl •iBBBB
" ®®® ®® 1sy Southwest Laboratory of Oklahoma8716 E. 43rd/Tulsa. Oklahoma 74145/(918)665-0680
CUENT: Nova Engineering NUMBER 1424504 N. WalnutBroken Arrow, OK 74012 August 31, 1981ATTN: Tom Barrett - -
SUBJECT: E-^ Toxicity Extractions of Soit Saniples
c"tSample Identification: ^3 J-2- - c^
0PARAMnER RESULTS (mg/D 0
0Arsen-ic .03 0Barium ^.1Cadmium <.05Chromium <.05Copper <.05Lead < . 5Mercury .0002Nickel < .05Selenium .004Silver <.05Zinc <.05
Superfund Adm.'nistr aliveRecord Docun-ienE:
0 0 0 0 0 4
SouthwestJ^boratory of Oklahoma: ,«i*-y '"" ~^y^y ^ ^
^^yi^-^^, ^.^y.y^'^.^ ^^^^-
^S iS^SS^^ ONLV T0 " TESrEt) AN0 A"e Nor "' ^^"-•^ •NOtCAWE OF THE OU*OT5 OF AP^eWrLV |
Attachment: ^.5——^————————————————————-^——. (7 of
^SSBB ^@BB W® ^^s r Southwest Laboratory of Oklahoma
, . . . 8716 E. 43rd/Tulsa. Oklahoma 74145, "(918)665-0680
CUENT: Novi Engineering NUMBER 1425504 N. Walnut
Broken Arrow, OK 74012 ^ust 31^ ^QlMTN: Tom Barrett
SUBJECT: E.P. Toxicity Extractions of Soil Samples
Sample Identification; iM 0-1 L
<PARAMETER SSyUiJinSZ!! <
(_ Arsenic .12 /Barium <^.1Cadmium .21Chromium ,60Copper . 13Lead <.5Mercury .0006Nickel .50Selenium .040Silver .05Zinc 9.86
Superfund Adm;nistra ive; Rficord Document
^ oo^ops; . , . , . Southwes^boratory^t,0klahoma
' ' ' ^-^ .^/^ ^r
^^^^.^ ^ A-^^ -< - ''- '-.t-'———t,.——————»^A————-f-..————^- -f'lrf'TU-'l ——y-T^-J'-^ J^^-.g-^J,——-^_^- », - : - —"»"»• wri >"- air
^ "O cTs"'' ONLy r0 rHE SAMP1'6 resTe0 AN0 A^ ttiQT ww^ w^^ OF E OUALlTltfi O^APPARSNUY
-"-"•——————-•""Jl-S^^W. tkQ S^ <?( V^ petroleum infi^"-"
? ^^ ACtdchment: 4.5f"""—————————————: »—l (8 of -^
^ f jM»iH M ^88^ ' " : : ;'1"1-' '"' '^—MB KSBaBHB H^ aHBHBB . • •
Syf -^W 9w w Southwest Laboratory of Okfahomc6716 E. 43rd/Tuisa. Oklahoma 74745/(918)665-06&
CUCTT: Nova Engineenng NUMBER 1426504 N. Walnut
Broken Arrow, OK 74012 ..August 31 , 1981ATTN: Torn Barrett
saJBJECT: E'P- Toxicity Extractions of Soil Samples ^ > . ".
<Sample Identification: i?4 2-2 <
<PAR jgTiR RESULTS (mg/J) <
Arsem'c .03Barium ^ .1Cadmium < .05Chromiuin ^ ,0?Copper ^.05Lead < .5Mercury - .0004Micke] <.05Selenium .054Silver <.05Zinc <.05
Super/und AdministraweRecord Document
0 0 0 0 9 < ;::.' • " Southwes^L^boratorY^ O^abQp^a
% SS^ J Ts ONLV r0 SAMPt-£ TESf60 AND ABE Nor NFCES3AR' 'WAr^e o. THE Q^W&OF App^E^y,,.I,,T.|*- .|.H -*»-««*» ' 'Servicing th^ ^i^-4" - ' "
Attachment; ^* .5——————————————————————.'"^——| (9 of ^
iK§ B»§ B€I vy ^n—-_____-^ Southwest Laboratory of Oklahoma *• 8716 E. 43rd/Tulsa. Oklahoma 74145/(918)665-0680
CUENT: Nova Engineering NUMBER 1427504 H. WalnutBroken Arrow, OK 74012 August 31 , 1981
; ATTN: Tom BarrettI
SUBJECT: £.P. ToxicHy Extractions of Soil Samples^^y .- - - • < - -- ' . " " ' ' •v'. _ i- - ^ r li t't l
: -»^_ • .-^-^—-i.-CTi""--"--——"1'——••'•-.-. • •,' J-" m.n" -*•"^1^^'«'J!"11'"!'^"1' i " ""•"•" '"""I'i'Sg!"?' ' '——- •"-" ••- •- _ _ ___„. . ..„.„„- rii—aM-i^
/^^ Sample Identif icat- ion: ^S 0-1
PARAMETER RESULTS (mg/1)l? Arsenic , .06
Barium ^ .5Cadm-ium <:.05Chroniium < .05Copper <.05Lead <.5Mercury .0004Nickel <,05Selenium .002Sliver <.05Zinc <.05
Superfund AdministrativeRecord Document
0 0 0 0 9 ?
, ^J Southwes^L^borator^0^0kl3honiaR' - ''' : '- 7 • • ^ . -.f ^J' -.
^T^ ^ n^C^ ONLy T0 '"' SAMPLE resTEOAN0 AR6 H°T NECfeSSAflK.V .NOfGAI OF IHE OUAtff^SOF ^P^E»ny
.—s—————————————"ServiciaQ the Needs of.ths Petroleum Indtssiirv"__________ __
Attachment ^ .5—.,——————————-V-, (ic"^y 12)igUfil ^^——M——k •HimH^ B ———^——— IHHHiHf
EBW wvw ww vr Southwest Laboratory of Oklahoma'' 8716 E, 43rd/Tulsa. Oklahoma 74145/(918}665-0680
;UENT: Nova Engineering NUMBER 1428504 N. Walnut . , ., „.-,Broken Arrow. OK 74012 August 31, .,981ATTN: Tom Barrett
DBJECT: E-P- Toxicity Extractions of Soil Samples
Sample Identification: ^5 1-2 ^
0PARAMETER RESULTS (mg/1) 0
0Arsenic .06 0Barium <-.!Cadniium ^.05Chromium < .05Copper <.05Lead <.5Mercury .0003Nickel .20Selenium .004Silver <^.05Zinc <.05
Superfund Administr itiveRecord Documsn
0 0 0 0 9 ?
Southwest^»oratory^f OklahomaflV ' ^^ '"^ -^'^t^^Z^
reas AHO REPOHTS APPLV ONLY TO TH£ SAMPL£ rgsyeo AW *flE HOT NECEssARa Y uyDtCAnve OF THE QuALfriES QP AWAKENS,LO« &M1LAR PWMXICTS ^w ^•a^K wMrw&"'t-»
________________^^^t_-.. AccacAtdent ^..5t, ) (11 Ol2)oi H|| | ^&
aH? -ww Bfli^W Southwest Laboratory of Oklahoma8716 E. 43rd/Tulsa. Oklahoma 7^145/(918)665-0680
;UENT: Nova Engineering NUMBER 1429; 504 N. Walnu t Auou^t 31 1981
Broken Arrow, OK 74012 Auoust J1' lyoi
; AHN: Tom Barrett
lUBJECT: E.P- Toxicity Extractions of Soil Samples!
Sample Identification: i?6 0-1(T'0^
PARAMETER RESULTS (mg/1) C
Arsenic -08 ^Barium ^ •!•Cadmium <-05 c
Chromium -09Copper • 1 0
Lead < - 5
Mercury -OO14
Nickel <-05
Selenium •014
Silver <-05
Zinc -20
Superfund AdmidiStratn eRecord Document
0 0 0 0 3 9
Southwesy^borator^pf pklahorpa^^y^^ •^^^^^^
UR LETTEF® ANO REPORTS APPLY ONLY TO THE SAMPLE TESTED AND AR6 NOT MECESSARfLY IM01CAT1V6 OF THg QUAinieS QF APPAfiENTLV3ENTCA1. OR SIMUtR PRODUCTS - - '- '•t •'-*'
**C'A>ri.>J>iAM «J*A fdaarie f\f fha Dat^nlftUfn. lnftsie9e'u "_____________-_-_-.,-.-„-_--
• - . . . . — . . . — ... ^»> „. ^Attachment 4.5 (
—HI • ^~] " " — i:mm|iA BRJB BdB ^iir
^^ Southwest Laboratory of Oklahoma8716 E. 43rd/Tulsa, Oklahoma 74145/(918)665-0660
CUENT: Nova Engineering NUMBER 1397-A504 N. Walnut - , . .....Broken Arrow, OK 74012 September 8, 1981ATTN: Tom Barrett
SUBJECT: £.P. Toxici'ty Extractions of Soil Samples
Sample Identification: ^6 J-2
PARAMETER RJSULTS (mg/il)Arsenic ,015Barium ^.05Cadmium <,05Chromium .10Copper <.05Lead <,5Mercury .0007Nickel <.lSelenium .20Silver <,01Zinc .08
Superfund AdministrativeRecord Document
0 0 0 1 0 0
Southwest^^orator^ Oklahpmasv : ^^ ; ^^^ -.
^^ S^S^!^ ONLy T0 IHfe SAMPl£ r65Te0 Aw AR6 f'or ^ECES5Afl'^-v 'W1CAT,VE OP THt QUALlT.ES OF APPARENT^„ „ , , „ , - - - _ - — "C«^»;^.:-- -L
- -- 1™— x^. Attachment ^ * 6
'•BBiB ^ ( lof"MEflHBk "S^BBS ——^ffl! HBBM9
—— www vw wr Southwest Laboratory of Oktahoma8716 £. 43rd/Tulsa. Oklahoma 74145/(918)665-0680
CUENT: Nova Engineering NUMBER T1381504 N. Walnut , , ,- ,-.,Broken Arrow. OK 74012 "uly 1"* 19U1
ATTN: Tom Barrect
SUBvlECT: \W.er Analysis
i?l Core Boring n'4 Core BoringPARAMETER _ 6-26-81 _ ,6-26-81
Arsenic, mg/1 <.01 ^.01Barium, mg/1 .10 <.10Cadniiuni. mg/I < ,06 <.05Carbon, Total Organic, mg/1 1200 24Chlorides, mg/1 170 154Chrcniiuni. rng/1 ^0.05 <0.05Copper, mg/1 ^ .05 <.05Halogens, Total Organic, ppm ^ 1 < 1Iron, mg/1 .72 .61Lead. mg/1 <0.5 <0.5Manganese, nig/I .36 .08Mercury, mg/1 .0005 .0003Nickel, nig/I .38 .34Kitrates, mg/1 < 0.1 0 .17pti @ 25°C Untested Untested
Selenium, mg/1 -CO.05 <0.05Silver, ing/I < 0.05 <0.05Sodium, mg/1 15 -8 24.9Specific Gravity @ 60°F 1.0084 1.006^Per^"Q'Adrl.;ni
Sulfatos. pig/I 276 294 ^^^UiTZinc,'mg/1 .07 .06
O O O KSouthwest LaboratOQK?f qkl ioma
- ' ' ^y^——
ST^S Si J 'S1' ONLY T0 rH£ SAMP1•E TEST6D Aw AftE Nor N£C65SAR!LY •NO!CAr«/6 Qf 1H& QU^UTfeS OF APPAfleNtfcY
-"-—-——••••"•'-—"-••-^-.. "ServicinsJ tha A/aaric /^ <'*" o-*—'- - • • • --
_*'_________________. •""'' ^-< Attachment 4.6— — — — ~ ~ ' ""I .. } (2 of 2)
OS I ^^i H®^ «@ ^ Southwest Laboratory of Oklahoma
: . 8716 E. 43rd/Tulsa, Oklahoma 74145/(918»665-0680
CUENT: Nova Engineering NUMBER T1381504 N. Walnut paqp 2Broken Arrow, OK 74012 "'ATTN: Tonn Barrefct
SUlBJECT: Mater Analysis
Analysis or the Herbicides and Pesticides for both samples (<
Endrin None DetectedLindane None Detected <
Methoxychtor None DetectedToxaphene None Detected2,4-D None Detected2.4,5-T None Detected
Superfund Adrn;ni?trati' eRecord Docui'nfent
0 0 0 1 0 2
Southwest Laboratory of Oklahoma^'~ -^f \ - . . . . ny • ^ • ^^•^^^'€.{^,
OUH tSntWS AHD REPORTS APPLY ONLY TO THE SAMPLE TESTED AND AR£ NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF THfc QUALITIES OF APPARENTLYlOeNTH^U. OR SIMtLAfl PRODUCTS
^^™———————————"Servicing the Needs o([the ^efroteym industry"————————————————--— ••-" " . ^^^^^ .o^ ramG^T^w^^ iaa^^
.^bml tti- 'd'-By: Nova Kri^.ir'.o^rnif' i————;
An^'n^d Laboratory No: 8l^t0^ thru 3 l , ' hn ggg
iiat^ E^ceived: 5/Z1/8I Unto f^port^t: o/->/fh < A P I SEPfiMr^^ S5^(, 'BOTTOM"? .^ ^
dimple Identification: 6l^0? - ff\ ."^ - ^' ^l .^o^i - //3 ^ff7^ ' ^ 8l?^ "• ^5Ql^OT - ^6 8L'^u8 - //Y ^.•'.o'/ - /^i ^l?rTu^^ 8l^l/ ^ ,?i0
Tt•5t 612^0^ 8 [.^.03 Kl^u)h 61^0^ \ Ql'.'W
P", units — .„ .„ ^^ .:Appearance (See Attached)Mercury ^ Hg 0,0003 0.0003 O.OOO- 0.000^ (. 000^ 1 )Selenium as Se < 0.00.1 O.OO; 1 y.OOl 0.002 0 0 0 2Silver as Ag 0.05 < 0.0.^ < n.03 0.0fi < o 'O^RAriura as Ba 3.^ < t < 1 < ^ / ^ '!,oad as Pb < O.I < 0 . 1 < o . f • • , o.jo / 1 9 8 -Chrorrjuffl as Cr < o.05 < 0.i)S < o.o^ < 0.0^ / < o 'O^.-•.^mium as Cd < 0.03 < o . o ^ < (.t.Oi < u.r^ / < o 'o^Arsr-ni(- as As < 0,03 < 0.0. < 0.03 0.;^ / < 0.'03
Te£t 81^07 8i;'^)^ '•;(;1^^ /^T^Tj^^ 83:^1.1
pHt unUs --- y . ( > „__ ( Y ^ //Appearance (See Attached) /? . \Mercury as Hg O.oooo o.(mf)« 0.0006 (' o.ooo6^ ^ oonrt
^ Selenium as Se 0.00.' O.oot u.ooi / 0.001 ) < o 001Silver as Aff < 0.0-; < > ; . o < < o.;^ / < 0.0-^ / < o.o3Barium as Ba < 1 < i ;.', Y_ i .^ ) ;.'! '''^Lead as Fb 0 . 1 < . . . 1 < u. i f 0.;^ ^ ^^^ --^,3ehromluni as Cr < O.O' ' < t » . o ' , < n.o'. 'i < o.i-)1; ^ < o '^ ^ Cadmium as Cd < 0 .03 < 0.;-, < 0.0-^ 7 < 0^3 ) ^ ,/^3 ^?Arsenic as As < 0 . 0 ^ < ( ; . . » < ,' , ; . , ) ^ <• f^^-i / • / / / . ^s
\ y ' " '"'fl?^te; pH ffieasureaent on s ix ot' UK* tn . . . .• i ; : !?-! .- :- , ; i i , , i r c ' ; , . ' ', ( , ( . E ; • . • m ; . ' . v-^s^^-—-'^ • '-
i.
Tlie above results vere obtained l.y Ai'i lA ^; •t;i.t:tn( M.-i ip i , t 1 ' . , ! ' ' i( i! r.i., f , fA M<'thuih; for f 'ho in ic f t i Anrtjyt.ii.--; or Wfit-er ur.'JWustes and/or ASTM Standard?;, unless othervi:;^ i EiJ K'- i t .•J . |{f.';ut t ; ; • ( r -^ Jn mi I } i ^ntm;, per Itti?r unless uthervi^^ indr^^-i.
>>
^ Superfur^d AdrnfrttstratEveRecord Document ., -
? - , - 0 0 0 1 O ?L _ _________________________________________ _______________________ ______________________
Appearance
812^02 fine gritty soft :-luJge
6l2h03 hard "tar-like" sludge
8lUW like bits of coal ar-.d coal dust
8l!*ti05 yellow liquid
81^^06 brown dirt and liquid
81^07 like tar ^0
8l' !;0o black grease and liquid ' ~0
61^^09 "claylike", iignt brcvn 0
(,8ll(**10 gr&y -lay ar.d liquid API ^E'^^^^TOR, DOTTO^S^
811*1*!! li:ie brown soil
: Superfund AdministrativeRecord Documsnt
. - • • -.;,-^. . - .. • • • - ;, 0 0 0 1 0 4
ATTACHMENT 5.2SUMMARY OF MONITORING PLAN
for theCYRIL LAND TREATMENT FACILITY
TEST CATEGORY _______FIRST_YEAR__________\______AFTER FIRST YF:AR______________POST CLOSURE_________________________Frequency Samples Required Frequency { Samples Required ~Frequency | Samples Requ i red '1 , 0 [JNSATlfRATSD ZONE
AGRICULTURAL SOILANALYSIS1.! Soil Fertility
Levels Annually 4 topsoil samples Annually Same as first year Annually Same as first yea- \Nitrogen (O'-D from active fPhosphorous portion of landPotassium treacmenc areaCalciumMagnesium
1.2 pH Value pH ^IUQ\ &
!"3 Li[ne ' time. Re-Requirements quiremenc \
1.4 CEC
2.0 UNSATURATED ZONE 1HEAVY KETALS SOIL ,ANALYSIS ! '2.1 Heavy Metals Annually 8 samples from AnnuaLly Same as first year i N/A N/A ' ' f
Cadmium active portion '""Chromium of land treat- iLead ment area; 4Selenium topsoti samples '
(O'-r) and 42.2 TOC samples at 36"
_+_ depth , ^2.3 Oil Concent | S! n
: =r'- , 3•v-- • • ^~- - - _- ———_____ ________________ l ^7——————————————+——————————————————————————1————————————————*————————————————————————1———————————————\———————————————————————43
S ^S (Tr f——
. '•- ' ' '• . ^
^ Superfund Administrative ^ ? '^.. f^cord Document - 0 0 0 1 0 5 ^
TEST CATEGORY _______FIRST YEAR______ ________AFTEi< FIRST YEAR______g________POST CLOSURE______Frequency Samples Required Frequency T Samples Required . • Frequency Samples Required , .
GROUNDWATERANALYSIS3.1 Suitability Quarterly AC each well Annual ly Ac each well Annually At each well
Characteristics /H thru I'M ft I thru H Sf\ thru ^ArsenicBariumCadmiumChromiumFluorideLeadKereuryNitrates :Selenium i ; •Silvsr - '
3.2 QualityCharacteristics Quarterly AC each well Annually At each well NONE NONE
Chloride /U thru H fU thru ^IronM&nganesePhenols 'Soditicm ;
Sulfates j
3 .3 ContaminationCharacteristics Quarterly AC each well Semi- At each well NONE NONE
pH H I thru ff^ A n n u a l l y ^1 thru ^4SpecificConductanceTotal Organ- Vic Carbon ./
^ASTE SLUDGEANALYSIS ' ' ^4.1 Heavy Metals Annually One (1) repre- Annual ly Same as f irst year N/A N/A c
Cadmium (As gen- sentative sam- (As gen- ^0 ^ChroTOium erated by pie for each erated by , § c*Lead • the re- slu-lge source; the re- : (- 3. S. C SFelenium finery) l)Loaded Tank f inery) ^ 0> o S
4 . 2 pH Value ; Bottoms, 2) ' ° § §' ^ g-4.3 Oil Content Other Tank § 5' ^ §4.4 TOC Bottoms.3) API "~ ® £ ^ 3
^.S Nitrogen Separator 0 2.3 "Concent Bolt oms a:> £'•
_________________________ • ________ §
0 0 0 1 0 6