Transcript
Page 1: Semantic Web Technologies: Changing Bibliographic Descriptions?

North Atlantic Health Sciences Libraries2009 Meeting

October 26, 2009

Stuart L. Weibel Senior Research Scientist

NAHSL2009

Semantic Web Technologies:Changing Bibliographic

Futures?

Page 2: Semantic Web Technologies: Changing Bibliographic Descriptions?

NAHSL2009

Stuart Weibel

Stuart WeibelSenior Research Scientist

• OCLC Research• Dublin Core• Working in Seattle• Collaboration with UW• NSF DataNet proposal

for curation of scientific

data

Page 3: Semantic Web Technologies: Changing Bibliographic Descriptions?

NAHSL2009

Stuart Weibel

What’s this I hear about the Semantic Web?

• What is the Semantic Web?

• What does it have to do with bibliography?

• Does it make life better for patrons?

• Does it strengthen libraries?

• Is it practical?

• Where can we get some?

Page 4: Semantic Web Technologies: Changing Bibliographic Descriptions?

NAHSL2009

Stuart Weibel

What is the Semantic Web?

• An approach to embedding structure in web resources to facilitate the extraction of meaning by machines and people.

• A set of technologies– RDF: Resource Description Framework (a metadata

architecture for the Web)– OWL– SKOS– Linked Data

Page 5: Semantic Web Technologies: Changing Bibliographic Descriptions?

NAHSL2009

Stuart Weibel

Semantic Web Technologies:RDF

• RDF– a syntax for making assertions on the web– A structure to support inference by machines– RDF assertions are always expressed as triples

• An RDF assertion has a subject, a predicate, and and object:

Page 6: Semantic Web Technologies: Changing Bibliographic Descriptions?

NAHSL2009

Stuart Weibel

RDF Assertions:Subject – Predicate – Object

• This presentation has a title of Semantic Web Technologies: Changing Bibliographic Futures?

• The author of this presentation is Stuart Weibel• This presentation was delivered on 2009-10-26

Presentation

Semantic Web Technologies…

2009-10-26

Stuart Weibel

Title Author

Date of Delivery

Page 7: Semantic Web Technologies: Changing Bibliographic Descriptions?

NAHSL2009

Stuart Weibel

RDF Assertions

• Encoded in XML on the Web• The nodes (information resources) are URIs• The Arcs (predicates) are also URIs

Presentation

Semantic Web Technologies…

2009-10-26

http://example.org/staffid/12345

http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/title http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/creator

http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/date

Page 8: Semantic Web Technologies: Changing Bibliographic Descriptions?

NAHSL2009

Stuart Weibel

The only thing you need to know…

• RDF provides a web language for declaring relationships among information resources

• It is a bit like sentence diagramming • The important thing is to identify all the bits with

globally unique, persistent Identifiers (URIs)

Page 9: Semantic Web Technologies: Changing Bibliographic Descriptions?

NAHSL2009

Stuart Weibel

OWLWeb Ontology Language

• W3C standard for expressing ontology relationships

• Ontologies are important tools for knowledge representation

• The importance of knowledge representation diminishes rapidly as the scope of representation increases

• Still largely undemonstrated general impact

Page 10: Semantic Web Technologies: Changing Bibliographic Descriptions?

NAHSL2009

Stuart Weibel

SKOSSimple Knowledge

Organization System

• W3C standards designed to support the declaration of controlled vocabularies and classification systems using the idioms of the semantic web (RDF).

• SKOS is simpler than OWL• Less expertise required to deploy structured

terminologies

Page 11: Semantic Web Technologies: Changing Bibliographic Descriptions?

NAHSL2009

Stuart Weibel

Linked DataWhat's all the fuss about?

• The web is all about links: Anything new here?• A web of data versus a web of documents• Partly about granularity of resources

– Addressable assertions as opposed to addressable documents

• Partly about doing inference on the web• Making machines do more of the work of

interpreting data

Page 12: Semantic Web Technologies: Changing Bibliographic Descriptions?

NAHSL2009

Stuart Weibel

Principles of Linked DataTim Berners-Lee

• 1.Use URIs as names for things (identifiers)• 2. Use HTTP URIs so that people can look up

those names• 3.When someone looks up a URI, provide

useful information• 4.Include links to other URIs so that they can

discover more things

Page 13: Semantic Web Technologies: Changing Bibliographic Descriptions?

NAHSL2009

Stuart Weibel

Linked Open Data ProjectSeeding the Web of Data

http://linkeddata.org/

Page 14: Semantic Web Technologies: Changing Bibliographic Descriptions?

NAHSL2009

Stuart Weibel

Linked Data and Bibliography

• Linked Data is a natural approach for bibliographic data:

Why?

Because FRBR provides us with a coherent conceptual map of data about library assets

Page 15: Semantic Web Technologies: Changing Bibliographic Descriptions?

NAHSL2009

Stuart Weibel

FRBR Entities – Librarianship’s contribution to a richer,

structured (semantic) Web

Group 1 Group 2 Group 3

Work Person Concept

Expression Corporate body

Object

Manifestation Event

Item Place

Page 16: Semantic Web Technologies: Changing Bibliographic Descriptions?

NAHSL2009

Stuart Weibel

And don’t forget Social Bibliography:

User-Generated Content

Group 1 Group 2 Group 3

Work Person Concept

Expression Corporate body

Object

Manifestation

Event

Item Place• Book Reviews• Lists• Services• Commentary

Page 17: Semantic Web Technologies: Changing Bibliographic Descriptions?

NAHSL2009

Stuart Weibel

Hook everything together with the right sort of identifiers

• A coherent identifier infrastructure is essential to establishing a rich and dynamic scaffolding of interconnected information resources to support “users and uses of bibliographic data”

• Broad dissemination of canonical, globally-scoped public identifiers serves the library collaborative and is the single most compelling means of making library assets visible on the Web

Page 18: Semantic Web Technologies: Changing Bibliographic Descriptions?

NAHSL2009

Stuart Weibel

Some Design Parameters for Identifiers in the

Global Library Community

• Persistence• Universal accessibility• Global scoping• Search Engine

Optimization

• Canonical identification• Branding• Usability• Granularity and the

FRBR model

Page 19: Semantic Web Technologies: Changing Bibliographic Descriptions?

NAHSL2009

Stuart Weibel

Persistence

• Not technological, but rather, a function of the commitment of organizations

• Libraries and other cultural memory organizations do this well

• Harder to do in the digital era, but the community is up to the task

Page 20: Semantic Web Technologies: Changing Bibliographic Descriptions?

NAHSL2009

Stuart Weibel

Universal access and global scoping

• Open to all: public identifiers in a public Web• Should work in Myanmar, Melbourne, and

Minneapolis alike• WorldCat is the first globally-scoped identifier

architecture for library assets in which the global surrogate is mapped to locality

• Holdings data turns out to be critical in supporting the last mile problem

Page 21: Semantic Web Technologies: Changing Bibliographic Descriptions?

NAHSL2009

Stuart Weibel

Search Engine Optimization and Canonical Identifiers

• Visibility of assets in the global library is diluted by the multiplicity of identifiers– Many competing identifier schemes

– Localized versions of identifiers

• Agreement on a canonical identifier – Raises search engine ranking

– Concentrates aggregation of social content

– Simplifies supply-chain processing

– Is Item X the same as…related to… relevant to… Item Y?

Page 22: Semantic Web Technologies: Changing Bibliographic Descriptions?

NAHSL2009

Stuart Weibel

Usability of URIs

• URIs should be designed for people as well as machines

• URIs should be ‘speakable’• URIs should be a short as can be managed• URIs should have a predictable pattern that

makes them ‘hackable’ and ‘truncatable’

Page 23: Semantic Web Technologies: Changing Bibliographic Descriptions?

NAHSL2009

Stuart Weibel

Is Linked Data Good for Libraries?

• Linked data can help users navigate authors, articles, concepts, organizations, and their relationship to other resources on the Web

• Linked data can help fix library assets in the context of other data on the Web

• Linked data can help reduce the barriers between traditional catalogs and the open Web

Page 24: Semantic Web Technologies: Changing Bibliographic Descriptions?

NAHSL2009

Stuart Weibel

Social Networking Software

• It isn’t new… only the technical manifestation is• Library services in emerging social networks • Motivate people to participate

– Tagging– Book Reviews– Emergent relationships, evident from data about what people

buy and borrow, like and dislike (business intelligence)

• Link to the people as well

Page 25: Semantic Web Technologies: Changing Bibliographic Descriptions?

NAHSL2009

Stuart Weibel

Linked Data will help fix library assets in their larger context

• Tags, book reviews, recommendation data is an increasingly important component of bibliography

• Crowd-sourced data need not go in our catalogs

• Reliable, canonical identifiers will help tie together heterogeneous content

Page 26: Semantic Web Technologies: Changing Bibliographic Descriptions?

NAHSL2009

Stuart Weibel

Web is a wonderful metaphor, but perhaps something a bit more durable?

• We want more– Coherence and context– Durable environments that help us preserve

and fix resources in the context of culture– Librarianship embedded in the emerging

technologies of a social, semantic Web– Linked data

Page 27: Semantic Web Technologies: Changing Bibliographic Descriptions?

NAHSL2009

Stuart Weibel

Web or Scaffolding?http://www.smart-kit.com/s291/what-spider-webs-can-teach-us-about-caffeines-effect-on-the-brain/

Page 28: Semantic Web Technologies: Changing Bibliographic Descriptions?

NAHSL2009

Stuart Weibel

Is Linked Data Practical?

• Libraries know better than most the importance of managing quality and establishing authority

• It is unclear what the best formats for exposing linked data to the open web might be

• The spirit of the Web suggests trying things and changing them as appropriate.

• Watch Hans Rosling’s Ted Talk for an example of how linked data can shine

Page 29: Semantic Web Technologies: Changing Bibliographic Descriptions?

NAHSL2009

Stuart Weibel

The future of Library catalogs?

• Evolving towards the network level• Collections linked to people, organizations, global

locations, concepts, context, metadata, and social networking benefits

• Fit into the workflow and social lives of patrons• Help create a scaffolding for past knowledge and

future productivity

Page 30: Semantic Web Technologies: Changing Bibliographic Descriptions?

NAHSL2009

Stuart Weibel

An Example of Linked Data in Action

• Hans Rosling’s tour de force of linked data on the Web

• http://www.ted.com/talks/hans_rosling_shows_the_best_stats_you_ve_ever_seen.html

Page 31: Semantic Web Technologies: Changing Bibliographic Descriptions?

NAHSL2009

Stuart Weibel

Some Early Efforts

• Libris: Catalog of the National Library of Sweden designed from a linked data perspective

• Library of Congress Authorities: http://ld.loc.gov – LCSH

• Dewey.info is a web site that presents the Dewey Summaries as Linked Data.

Page 32: Semantic Web Technologies: Changing Bibliographic Descriptions?

NAHSL2009

Stuart Weibel

Thanks for your attention!

• Find me on

Facebook

Twitter

weibel-lines.typepad.com


Top Related