semantic web technologies: changing bibliographic descriptions?

32
North Atlantic Health Sciences Libraries 2009 Meeting October 26, 2009 Stuart L. Weibel Senior Research Scientist NAHSL 2009 Semantic Web Technologies: Changing Bibliographic Futures?

Upload: stuart-weibel

Post on 22-Nov-2014

3.922 views

Category:

Technology


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Keynote presentation at the North Atlantic Health Science Library meeting, October 26, 2009. An introduction to semantic web technologies and their relationship to libraries and bibliographic data.Stuart Weibel, Senior Research Scientist, OCLC Research

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Semantic Web Technologies: Changing Bibliographic Descriptions?

North Atlantic Health Sciences Libraries2009 Meeting

October 26, 2009

Stuart L. Weibel Senior Research Scientist

NAHSL2009

Semantic Web Technologies:Changing Bibliographic

Futures?

Page 2: Semantic Web Technologies: Changing Bibliographic Descriptions?

NAHSL2009

Stuart Weibel

Stuart WeibelSenior Research Scientist

• OCLC Research• Dublin Core• Working in Seattle• Collaboration with UW• NSF DataNet proposal

for curation of scientific

data

Page 3: Semantic Web Technologies: Changing Bibliographic Descriptions?

NAHSL2009

Stuart Weibel

What’s this I hear about the Semantic Web?

• What is the Semantic Web?

• What does it have to do with bibliography?

• Does it make life better for patrons?

• Does it strengthen libraries?

• Is it practical?

• Where can we get some?

Page 4: Semantic Web Technologies: Changing Bibliographic Descriptions?

NAHSL2009

Stuart Weibel

What is the Semantic Web?

• An approach to embedding structure in web resources to facilitate the extraction of meaning by machines and people.

• A set of technologies– RDF: Resource Description Framework (a metadata

architecture for the Web)– OWL– SKOS– Linked Data

Page 5: Semantic Web Technologies: Changing Bibliographic Descriptions?

NAHSL2009

Stuart Weibel

Semantic Web Technologies:RDF

• RDF– a syntax for making assertions on the web– A structure to support inference by machines– RDF assertions are always expressed as triples

• An RDF assertion has a subject, a predicate, and and object:

Page 6: Semantic Web Technologies: Changing Bibliographic Descriptions?

NAHSL2009

Stuart Weibel

RDF Assertions:Subject – Predicate – Object

• This presentation has a title of Semantic Web Technologies: Changing Bibliographic Futures?

• The author of this presentation is Stuart Weibel• This presentation was delivered on 2009-10-26

Presentation

Semantic Web Technologies…

2009-10-26

Stuart Weibel

Title Author

Date of Delivery

Page 7: Semantic Web Technologies: Changing Bibliographic Descriptions?

NAHSL2009

Stuart Weibel

RDF Assertions

• Encoded in XML on the Web• The nodes (information resources) are URIs• The Arcs (predicates) are also URIs

Presentation

Semantic Web Technologies…

2009-10-26

http://example.org/staffid/12345

http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/title http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/creator

http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/date

Page 8: Semantic Web Technologies: Changing Bibliographic Descriptions?

NAHSL2009

Stuart Weibel

The only thing you need to know…

• RDF provides a web language for declaring relationships among information resources

• It is a bit like sentence diagramming • The important thing is to identify all the bits with

globally unique, persistent Identifiers (URIs)

Page 9: Semantic Web Technologies: Changing Bibliographic Descriptions?

NAHSL2009

Stuart Weibel

OWLWeb Ontology Language

• W3C standard for expressing ontology relationships

• Ontologies are important tools for knowledge representation

• The importance of knowledge representation diminishes rapidly as the scope of representation increases

• Still largely undemonstrated general impact

Page 10: Semantic Web Technologies: Changing Bibliographic Descriptions?

NAHSL2009

Stuart Weibel

SKOSSimple Knowledge

Organization System

• W3C standards designed to support the declaration of controlled vocabularies and classification systems using the idioms of the semantic web (RDF).

• SKOS is simpler than OWL• Less expertise required to deploy structured

terminologies

Page 11: Semantic Web Technologies: Changing Bibliographic Descriptions?

NAHSL2009

Stuart Weibel

Linked DataWhat's all the fuss about?

• The web is all about links: Anything new here?• A web of data versus a web of documents• Partly about granularity of resources

– Addressable assertions as opposed to addressable documents

• Partly about doing inference on the web• Making machines do more of the work of

interpreting data

Page 12: Semantic Web Technologies: Changing Bibliographic Descriptions?

NAHSL2009

Stuart Weibel

Principles of Linked DataTim Berners-Lee

• 1.Use URIs as names for things (identifiers)• 2. Use HTTP URIs so that people can look up

those names• 3.When someone looks up a URI, provide

useful information• 4.Include links to other URIs so that they can

discover more things

Page 13: Semantic Web Technologies: Changing Bibliographic Descriptions?

NAHSL2009

Stuart Weibel

Linked Open Data ProjectSeeding the Web of Data

http://linkeddata.org/

Page 14: Semantic Web Technologies: Changing Bibliographic Descriptions?

NAHSL2009

Stuart Weibel

Linked Data and Bibliography

• Linked Data is a natural approach for bibliographic data:

Why?

Because FRBR provides us with a coherent conceptual map of data about library assets

Page 15: Semantic Web Technologies: Changing Bibliographic Descriptions?

NAHSL2009

Stuart Weibel

FRBR Entities – Librarianship’s contribution to a richer,

structured (semantic) Web

Group 1 Group 2 Group 3

Work Person Concept

Expression Corporate body

Object

Manifestation Event

Item Place

Page 16: Semantic Web Technologies: Changing Bibliographic Descriptions?

NAHSL2009

Stuart Weibel

And don’t forget Social Bibliography:

User-Generated Content

Group 1 Group 2 Group 3

Work Person Concept

Expression Corporate body

Object

Manifestation

Event

Item Place• Book Reviews• Lists• Services• Commentary

Page 17: Semantic Web Technologies: Changing Bibliographic Descriptions?

NAHSL2009

Stuart Weibel

Hook everything together with the right sort of identifiers

• A coherent identifier infrastructure is essential to establishing a rich and dynamic scaffolding of interconnected information resources to support “users and uses of bibliographic data”

• Broad dissemination of canonical, globally-scoped public identifiers serves the library collaborative and is the single most compelling means of making library assets visible on the Web

Page 18: Semantic Web Technologies: Changing Bibliographic Descriptions?

NAHSL2009

Stuart Weibel

Some Design Parameters for Identifiers in the

Global Library Community

• Persistence• Universal accessibility• Global scoping• Search Engine

Optimization

• Canonical identification• Branding• Usability• Granularity and the

FRBR model

Page 19: Semantic Web Technologies: Changing Bibliographic Descriptions?

NAHSL2009

Stuart Weibel

Persistence

• Not technological, but rather, a function of the commitment of organizations

• Libraries and other cultural memory organizations do this well

• Harder to do in the digital era, but the community is up to the task

Page 20: Semantic Web Technologies: Changing Bibliographic Descriptions?

NAHSL2009

Stuart Weibel

Universal access and global scoping

• Open to all: public identifiers in a public Web• Should work in Myanmar, Melbourne, and

Minneapolis alike• WorldCat is the first globally-scoped identifier

architecture for library assets in which the global surrogate is mapped to locality

• Holdings data turns out to be critical in supporting the last mile problem

Page 21: Semantic Web Technologies: Changing Bibliographic Descriptions?

NAHSL2009

Stuart Weibel

Search Engine Optimization and Canonical Identifiers

• Visibility of assets in the global library is diluted by the multiplicity of identifiers– Many competing identifier schemes

– Localized versions of identifiers

• Agreement on a canonical identifier – Raises search engine ranking

– Concentrates aggregation of social content

– Simplifies supply-chain processing

– Is Item X the same as…related to… relevant to… Item Y?

Page 22: Semantic Web Technologies: Changing Bibliographic Descriptions?

NAHSL2009

Stuart Weibel

Usability of URIs

• URIs should be designed for people as well as machines

• URIs should be ‘speakable’• URIs should be a short as can be managed• URIs should have a predictable pattern that

makes them ‘hackable’ and ‘truncatable’

Page 23: Semantic Web Technologies: Changing Bibliographic Descriptions?

NAHSL2009

Stuart Weibel

Is Linked Data Good for Libraries?

• Linked data can help users navigate authors, articles, concepts, organizations, and their relationship to other resources on the Web

• Linked data can help fix library assets in the context of other data on the Web

• Linked data can help reduce the barriers between traditional catalogs and the open Web

Page 24: Semantic Web Technologies: Changing Bibliographic Descriptions?

NAHSL2009

Stuart Weibel

Social Networking Software

• It isn’t new… only the technical manifestation is• Library services in emerging social networks • Motivate people to participate

– Tagging– Book Reviews– Emergent relationships, evident from data about what people

buy and borrow, like and dislike (business intelligence)

• Link to the people as well

Page 25: Semantic Web Technologies: Changing Bibliographic Descriptions?

NAHSL2009

Stuart Weibel

Linked Data will help fix library assets in their larger context

• Tags, book reviews, recommendation data is an increasingly important component of bibliography

• Crowd-sourced data need not go in our catalogs

• Reliable, canonical identifiers will help tie together heterogeneous content

Page 26: Semantic Web Technologies: Changing Bibliographic Descriptions?

NAHSL2009

Stuart Weibel

Web is a wonderful metaphor, but perhaps something a bit more durable?

• We want more– Coherence and context– Durable environments that help us preserve

and fix resources in the context of culture– Librarianship embedded in the emerging

technologies of a social, semantic Web– Linked data

Page 27: Semantic Web Technologies: Changing Bibliographic Descriptions?

NAHSL2009

Stuart Weibel

Web or Scaffolding?http://www.smart-kit.com/s291/what-spider-webs-can-teach-us-about-caffeines-effect-on-the-brain/

Page 28: Semantic Web Technologies: Changing Bibliographic Descriptions?

NAHSL2009

Stuart Weibel

Is Linked Data Practical?

• Libraries know better than most the importance of managing quality and establishing authority

• It is unclear what the best formats for exposing linked data to the open web might be

• The spirit of the Web suggests trying things and changing them as appropriate.

• Watch Hans Rosling’s Ted Talk for an example of how linked data can shine

Page 29: Semantic Web Technologies: Changing Bibliographic Descriptions?

NAHSL2009

Stuart Weibel

The future of Library catalogs?

• Evolving towards the network level• Collections linked to people, organizations, global

locations, concepts, context, metadata, and social networking benefits

• Fit into the workflow and social lives of patrons• Help create a scaffolding for past knowledge and

future productivity

Page 30: Semantic Web Technologies: Changing Bibliographic Descriptions?

NAHSL2009

Stuart Weibel

An Example of Linked Data in Action

• Hans Rosling’s tour de force of linked data on the Web

• http://www.ted.com/talks/hans_rosling_shows_the_best_stats_you_ve_ever_seen.html

Page 31: Semantic Web Technologies: Changing Bibliographic Descriptions?

NAHSL2009

Stuart Weibel

Some Early Efforts

• Libris: Catalog of the National Library of Sweden designed from a linked data perspective

• Library of Congress Authorities: http://ld.loc.gov – LCSH

• Dewey.info is a web site that presents the Dewey Summaries as Linked Data.

Page 32: Semantic Web Technologies: Changing Bibliographic Descriptions?

NAHSL2009

Stuart Weibel

Thanks for your attention!

• Find me on

Facebook

Twitter

weibel-lines.typepad.com