dr. arun kumarweb.iitd.ernet.in/~arunku/files/cvl212_y17/airpollution_intro.pdf · dr. arun kumar...
TRANSCRIPT
Air Pollution-Introductionfor CVL212-Environmental Engineering
(Second Semester 2017-18)
Dr. Arun Kumar Civil Engineering (IIT Delhi)
Courtesy: Dr. Irene Xagoraraki (U.S.A.)
May 3, 2018 [email protected] 3
Prediction for Pollutant Concentration
May 3, 2018 [email protected] 4
Point-Source Gaussian Plume Model
May 3, 2018 [email protected] 5
Point-Source Gaussian Plume Model
May 3, 2018 [email protected] 6
Point-Source Gaussian Plume Model
• Model Structure and Assumptions
– pollutants released from a “virtual point source”
– advective transport by wind
– dispersive transport (spreading) follows normal (Gaussian)distribution away from trajectory
– constant emission rate
– wind speed constant with time and elevation
– pollutant is conservative (no reaction)
– terrain is flat and unobstructed
– uniform atmospheric stability
May 3, 2018 [email protected] 7
Effective Stack Height
Where:
H = Effective stack height (m)
h = height of physical stack (m)
∆H = plume rise (m)
HhH ∆+=
May 3, 2018 [email protected] 8
Effective Stack Height (Holland’s formula) for
neutral conditions
where vs = stack velocity (m/s)
d = stack diameter (m)
u = wind speed (m)
P = pressure (kPa)
Ts = stack temperature (ºK)
Ta = air temperature (ºK)
( )
−×+=∆
−d
T
TTP
u
vH
a
ass 21068.25.1
May 3, 2018 [email protected] 9
• How much will be % error in C(x,0,0) if one uses Heffective(unstable) for stability class? Think qualitatively.
May 3, 2018 [email protected] 10
Atmospheric Stability Categories
May 3, 2018 [email protected] 11
Horizontal Dispersion
May 3, 2018 [email protected] 12
Vertical Dispersion
May 3, 2018 [email protected] 13
Wind Speed Correction
• Unless the wind speed at the virtual stack height is known, it must be estimated from the ground wind speed
Where: ux = wind speed at elevation zx
p = empirical constant
p
z
zuu
=
1
212
May 3, 2018 [email protected] 14
Example 2
• A stack in an urban area is emitting 80 g/s of NO. It
has an effective stack height of 100 m. The wind speed is 4 m/s at 10 m. It is a clear summer day with the sun nearly overhead.
• Estimate the ground level concentration at: a) 2 km downwind on the centerline and b) 2 km downwind, 0.1 km off the centerline.
May 3, 2018 [email protected] 15
1. Determine stability class
Assume wind speed is 4 km at ground surface. Description suggests strong solar radiation.
Stability class B
Example 2
May 3, 2018 [email protected] 17
3. Estimate the wind speed at the effective stack height
Note: effective stack height given – no need to
calculate using Holland’s formula
May 3, 2018 [email protected] 18
4. Determine concentration
a. x = 2000, y = 0
−
−=
22
220
100
2
1exp
290
0
2
1exp
)6.5)(220)(290(
80)0,2000(
πC
33 µg/m g/m 3.641043.6)0,2000( 5=×=
−C
Example 2
May 3, 2018 [email protected] 19
b. x = 2000, y = 0.1 km = 100 m
−
−=
22
220
100
2
1exp
290
100
2
1exp
)6.5)(220)(290(
80)100,2000(
πC
33 µg/m g/m 6.601006.6)0,2000( 5=×=
−C
Example 2
May 3, 2018 [email protected] 20
Example 3
• If in example #2, there is another stack (downwind distance from 1st stack =500m) with physical height (203m). Now, calculate overall ground level concentration at 2 km downwind on the center line? This 2nd stack is also emitting NO at same 80 g/s rate (all other conditions remain constant) (for stack #2: inside diameter =1.07m; air temp:13degC; barometric pressure =1000 milibars; stack gas velocity=9.14m/s; stack gas temp: 149degC)
May 3, 2018 [email protected] 21
Example 3 hints
• From stack #1, we know conc (C1)
• For stack #2, first calculate effective stack height using Holland’s formula� then calculate conc. at given
distance using approach given in Example 2 (apply correction for x= distance of receptor from stack #2)�say we get conc. C2
• Now total conc. at receptor =Ctotal=C1+C2
• Now see if this is less than Callowable
• If not, then we need to control stack heights or source strength
May 3, 2018 [email protected] 22
Example 4
• Question: Suppose an anemometer at a height of 10 m above ground measure wind velocity =2.5m/s. estimate the wind speed at an elevation of 300 m in rough terrain if atmosphere is unstable (i.e., k=0.2)?
• Answer:
• U300/u10=(300/10)(0.2)
• Wind velocity at 300m=(2.5)*(30)(0.2)=4.9m/s
p
z
zuu
=
1
212
May 3, 2018 [email protected] 23
CPCB minimum guideline for stack
based on SO2 emission
• CPCB minimum stack height =30m
• So Choose maximum (30m; hSO2)
May 3, 2018 [email protected] 24
Example 5
• A 40% efficient 1000MW coal fired power plant emitts SO2 at rate =6.47*108 microgram/s. the stack has effective height =20m (CPCB recommended minimum height =30m). An anemometer on a 10-m pole measures 2.5m/s of wind and atmospheric class is C.
• Predict the ground-level concentration of SO2 4 km directly downwind?
• What would be this concentration if stack height is changed to 30 m?
• What is the recommended stack height based on SO2 emission rate?
• Which stack height would you choose?
May 3, 2018 [email protected] 25
Example 6
• Repeat Example 5 for stability classes : B,C and D for calculating C(x,0,0) where X=0-100m with 4 m gap. Now plot C(x,0,0) versus distance or for different stability classes. Use effective height obtained from Example 6.
appendix
May 3, 2018 [email protected] 26
May 3, 2018 [email protected] 27
Dry Adiabatic Lapse Rate
Temperature, T (oC)
Altitu
de
, z (
km
)
Adiabatic lapse rate
1
2
= (T2-T1)/(z2-z1)
When any parcel of air moves up or down, it’s
temperature will change according to the adiabatic
lapse rate
For this parcel of air the
change in temperature with
altitude was:
T1T2
z1
z2= (10-20)oC/(2000-1000)m
= -1 oC/100m
May 3, 2018 [email protected] 28
Stability
• Dry adiabatic lapse rate: temperature decreases with increased altitude
• Atmospheric (actual) lapse rate
< Г (temperature falls faster) unstable (super-adiabatic)
> Г (temperature falls slower) stable (sub-adiabatic)
= Г (same rate) neutral
ft 1000F mC/100 /4500.1 °=°−=−=Γ .- dz
dT
May 3, 2018 [email protected] 29
Example 1
Z(m) T(ºC)
10 5.11
202 1.09
C/m °−=−
−=
−
−=
∆
∆0209.0
10202
11.509.1
12
12
zz
TT
z
T
m C/100 °−= 09.2
Since lapse rate is more negative than Г, (-1.00 ºC/100 m)=> atmosphereis unstable
May 3, 2018 [email protected] 30
Unstable Conditions Rapid vertical mixing
takes place.
-1.25 oC/100 m < -1 oC/100m Unstable air encourages the dispersion and dilution of pollutants.
actual temperature falls faster than Г
May 3, 2018 [email protected] 31
Stable Conditions Air at a certain altitude remains
at the same elevation.
-0.5 oC/100 m > -1 oC/100m
Stable air discourages
the dispersion and dilution of pollutants.
actual temperature falls slower than Г
May 3, 2018 [email protected] 32
Neutral Conditions Air at a certain altitude remains
at the same elevation.
Neutrally stable air discourages the dispersion
and dilution of pollutants.
-1 oC/100 m = -1 oC/100m