dr. h.-f. wagner, chairman global science forum of oecd future large-scale projects and programmes...

Dr. H.-F. Wagner, Chairman Global Science Forum of OECDDr. H.-F. Wagner, Chairman Global Science Forum of OECD

Future Large-Scale Projects Future Large-Scale Projects and Programmes inand Programmes in

Astronomy and AstrophysicsAstronomy and Astrophysics

Global Science ForumGlobal Science Forum

WorkshopsDecember 2003 / April 2004


Recommendations & Recommendations & Findings of the Findings of the

Workshops Workshops are on the Desks are on the Desks

of of Political Decision Makers Political Decision Makers

in allin allOECD CountriesOECD Countries


• Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development

• Intergovernmental Organisation, Site of residence: Paris

• Members: 30 Nations; Observers: 4 Nations

• Relationship with 70 other Nations • Founded 1960• Budget in 2005: 336 Mio. €


Contents of the PresentationContents of the Presentation

• Introduction of the Global Science Forum• Motivation for- and organisation of the

workshops• 11 findings and recommendations of the

Workshops for Policy-makersfor Policy-makers• Special findings and recommendations on:

1. Complementarity of Space- and Ground-Based Observations

2. Key Technological R&D3. Selection of Sites4. Data Management5. Generic Issues


• Committee of senior science policy officials of the OECD countries

• Provides a unique venue for consultations among scientists and policymakers

• Meetings twice a year at Paris• Reports go to the policy level of the

Governments

Global Science ForumGlobal Science Forum


Global Science Forum activities are proposed by member delegations.

All Global Science Forum activities result in a publicly-available policy-level report containing findings and action recommendations for governments, inter-governmental organisations, or the international scientific community.

Report available at

www.oecd.org/sti/gsf


Reports of GSF 1995 – 2006Reports of GSF 1995 – 2006

on Infrastructure-Related Topicson Infrastructure-Related Topics

1. Neutron Sources

2. High-Energy Neutrinos

3. Radio Astronomy

4. Proton Accelerators

5. Nuclear Physics I

6. Condensed Matter Facilities

7. High-Intensity Lasers

8. Astronomy and Astrophysics

9. High-Energy Physics

10. Structural Genomics

11. Bioinformatics

12. Biodiversity

13. Neuroinformatics

14. Management Practices for Large International Facilities

15. Grid Computing


Reports of GSF 1995 – 2006Reports of GSF 1995 – 2006

on Infrastructure-Related Topicson Infrastructure-Related Topics

In Progress:16. Earthquake Science

17. Nuclear Physics II

18. Energy Research

19. Scientific misconduct

20. Scientific collections

21. Polar research

22. Mathematics


Motivation for the WorkshopsMotivation for the Workshops

• Earth- and space-based instruments often cost

hundreds of millions of dollars, require more than ten

years for design and construction, and are often

exploited by a world-wide community.

Enormous datasets are being archived, and there are

ambitious plans for “Virtual Observatories” using the

increasing power of the Internet and, in the future, the

Grid.


• Therefore Governments wanted to know from the science community:

where the journey will be going to and whether the enormous funding involved could be justified

by science-policy makers

=>=> Answers expected i.e.: Why are new instruments necessary and for what

purpose and in what sequence?=> Could the science community embark on a global strategy for both ground- and space based instruments?

Could that be done internationally, globally? Could agencies like ESA, ESO, NASA act jointly and

coherently in the longer term? Are there technological benefits or other advantages for

R&D policy?

Motivation for the WorkshopsMotivation for the Workshops


Organisation of the WorkshopsOrganisation of the Workshops• Proposal: Germany, ESO as leading actor

• Steering Committee– Chairman

Ian CORBETT– Members

Greg HARPER, Greg FAHLMAN, Masanori IYE, Marijn FRANX, Ed VAN DEN HEUVEL, Wayne VAN CITTERS, Ron EKERS, Adrian RUSSELL, Stefan MICHALOWSKI

• Participants– 14 OECD countries and observers; Brazil, China, India, IAU

• Invited Experts– Willy BENZ, Brian BOYLE, Reinhard GENZEL,

Roberto GILMOZZI, Martin HARWIT, Andrew LAWRENCE, Malcolm LONGAIR, Peter MESZAROS, Piero SALINARI

• Venues:– 1 - 3 December 2003, Munich– 1 - 2 April 2004, Washington D.C.


Recommendations Recommendations and and

FindingsFindings


10 General Findings for Policy-makers10 General Findings for Policy-makers

1. Some of the most important future large projects and programmes will have to be organised and financed on a multi-national basis.

2. As research efforts coalesce around a small number of global-scale facilities, national scientific communities and science administrations will face difficult choices about pooling their resources to participate in new international undertakings, involving both:• Challenges: e.g., a loss of autonomy and Challenges: e.g., a loss of autonomy and • Opportunities: e.g., access to cutting-edge equipment and Opportunities: e.g., access to cutting-edge equipment and

technologytechnology..

3. Decision-makers will need to ensure that the inventory of resources (facilities, instruments, access rights, observing time) is commensurate with national requirements and the size of the scientific community.



4. Funding bodies should seek to advance astronomy in a balanced, integrated, and globally-coordinated way, from cosmology to planetary studies.

5. Links to other relevant fields such as high-energy and nuclear physics, earth sciences, and biology should be taken into account.

6. A science-based balance should be sought between surveys, special-purpose, and general-purpose projects. For the latter, it is desirable to promote the opening of unexplored “windows” in instrumental parameter space.

7. The selection and operation of new projects should be based both on the science case and on the opportunities for serendipitous discovery, which have proved so valuable in the past.



8. A global science-based consensus view on a long timescale, bringing together national and regional strategic plans for both space- and ground-based research, would be invaluable at national levels, giving agencies and governments a broader international perspective, and enabling smaller countries to see what is being planned elsewhere.

9. The desirability and feasibility of a long-term integrated vision for large projects and programmes should be addressed, with the goal of informing funding decisions on the next generation of large projects.

10.Regular community meetings to feed into such a consensus view would be essential to its credibility.


Special IssuesSpecial Issues


1. Complementarity of Space- and 1. Complementarity of Space- and Ground-Based ObservationsGround-Based Observations

1. Ground- and space-based observations are vital and complementary to the future of astronomy, so good communication and co-ordination good communication and co-ordination between the corresponding agencies are between the corresponding agencies are essentialessential.

2. As the costs and timescales associated with the largest ground-based projects increase, it becomes ever more important to ensure that the two the two modalities develop in a coordinated, mutually modalities develop in a coordinated, mutually supportive way,supportive way, based on shared scientific goals, with due consideration of relative costs and technological feasibility.



3. Therefore, interested countries and regions should establish or strengthen processes through which strategic investment plans for large ground- and space-based astronomy are developed and harmonised.

4. In cases where both approaches may be appropriate for carrying out important observations, support for R&D should be provided support for R&D should be provided such that, ultimately,such that, ultimately, informed investment choices between space informed investment choices between space and ground can be made,and ground can be made, maximising scientific gain and ensuring optimal use of financial resources.

5.5. It was greatly regretted that neither of the two main space It was greatly regretted that neither of the two main space agencies, ESA and NASA, chose to participate in the OECD agencies, ESA and NASA, chose to participate in the OECD workshops.workshops.



Mario Livio*) appraising Hubble’s top 10: In short, Hubble has been extremely influential not In short, Hubble has been extremely influential not

standing apart from other instruments and standing apart from other instruments and techniques but mainly by becoming deeply techniques but mainly by becoming deeply integrated with them.integrated with them.

*)Scientific American, July 2006


2. Key Technological R&D2. Key Technological R&D1. Progress in astronomy has always been driven by

technological innovation in many fields of science and engineering, and this will continue to be true for the next generation of big projects.

2. However, certain specific requirements for the next generation of astronomical facilities are such that astronomers will be less able to rely on technological progress in other fields.

3. Therefore, a global strategic view of technological requirements and key R&D areas related to possible new projects would be invaluable at national and regional levels.

4. The maximum benefit would come from a strategic view that would transcend the boundaries of individual projects and possibly even subjects.


2. Key Technological R&D2. Key Technological R&D

5. Thus there is a need to sponsor technology development aimed specifically at the anticipated needs of the future large-scale projects.

6. One of the most significant areas for technology development is detectors across the entire electromagnetic spectrum.

7. Especially big science gains are to be made in the far infrared and sub-mm wavelength regime.

8. Other key technology areas for public investments in R&D are listed in the report.


3. Selection of Sites3. Selection of Sites

1. The choice of the best location is vital to the success of a large ground-based astronomical facility. Therefore, evaluation and protection of potential sites could begin well before selection and construction.

2. For existing and potential sites at all wavelengths, measures should be taken to limit electromagnetic interference and light pollution, with the involvement and due consideration of the interests of all concerned parties.


3. Selection of Sites3. Selection of Sites

3. Interested countries should incorporate open and consensus-based site selection procedures when contemplating new international collaborative projects.

4. While facilities can bring benefits to host countries and enhance the lives of local inhabitants, the relationship between a facility and its surroundings is multi-faceted and bi-directional.

5. Planning should explicitly anticipate and address local environmental and cultural concerns.


4. Data Management4. Data Management

1. The huge volume of digital information flowing from new observatories raises the challenge of collecting, using, storing, and sharing data.

2. The workshops identified a number of major issues in the context of a new community-based vision for a common research infrastructure: the “Virtual Observatory”.

3. Impressive progress has been made and the momentum of the International Virtual Observatory Alliance will ensure sustained progress, provided support and funding are made available.


4. Data Management4. Data Management

4. Agencies and governments should recognise that this is an important long-term issue and should therefore co-ordinate plans on a long-term basis, encouraging the broadening of the existing VO collaboration into a fully representative global activity.

5. New projects and facilities must take data management, storage, maintenance, and dissemination into account at the earliest planning stages, consulting potential users in the process.

6. There should be open access to data, assuming the conventional proprietary period for the data takers.


5. Generic Issues5. Generic Issues1. In addition to the scientific and technical issues that

must be addressed in planning a major new project or programme, there are a range of important generic (i.e., legal, organisational, managerial) issues to be considered by governments and agencies. These are not unique to astronomy and there could be value in OECD compiling and evaluating a data base of current large projects in many fields.

2. A co-ordinated approach across governments in evaluating these issues would provide valuable information and advice to those who will make the final decisions.

3. There are lessons to be learned from the history of the development of large projects in many fields.


5. Generic Issues5. Generic Issues

4. A major issue of principle to be settled is that of access and participation of countries outside the inner core of initial advocates, not just in the utilisation of the facilities, but also in the R&D and construction phases.

5. Governments and agencies with an interest in future large projects and programmes could start discussions on the key generic problems, such as access and participation, including issues such as structure, funding and management of collaborations.


Many Thanks Many Thanks For For

Your AttentionYour Attention

www.oecd.org/sti/gsfwww.oecd.org/sti/gsf

dr. h.-f. wagner, chairman global science forum of oecd future large-scale projects and programmes...

Documents