dynamic field theory part 4: the memory trace and preshape · formation as the simplest form of...

39
Dynamic Field Theory Part 4: the memory trace and preshape Gregor Schöner [email protected]

Upload: others

Post on 21-Mar-2020

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Dynamic Field Theory Part 4: the memory trace and preshape · formation as the simplest form of learning habituation: the memory trace for inhibition.. the memory trace. ... 0 100

Dynamic Field Theory Part 4:

the memory trace and preshape

Gregor Schö[email protected]

Page 2: Dynamic Field Theory Part 4: the memory trace and preshape · formation as the simplest form of learning habituation: the memory trace for inhibition.. the memory trace. ... 0 100

Summary/recall

action, perception, and embodied cognition takes place in continuous spaces. peaks = units of representation are attractors of the neural dynamics

neural fields link neural representations to these continua

stable activation peaks are the units of neural representation

peaks arise and disappear through instabilities through which elementary cognitive functions (e.g. detection, selection, memory) emerge

Page 3: Dynamic Field Theory Part 4: the memory trace and preshape · formation as the simplest form of learning habituation: the memory trace for inhibition.. the memory trace. ... 0 100

Summary/recall

inhomogeneities in the field may be amplified into peaks through the (boost-driven) detection instability

Page 4: Dynamic Field Theory Part 4: the memory trace and preshape · formation as the simplest form of learning habituation: the memory trace for inhibition.. the memory trace. ... 0 100

boost-induced detection instability

dimensionactivation

preshape

dimensionactivation

dimensionactivation

self-excited activation peak

boost

boost

preshape

preshape

Page 5: Dynamic Field Theory Part 4: the memory trace and preshape · formation as the simplest form of learning habituation: the memory trace for inhibition.. the memory trace. ... 0 100

… emergence of categories?

if we understand, how such inhomogeneities come about, we understand the emergence of categories…

Page 6: Dynamic Field Theory Part 4: the memory trace and preshape · formation as the simplest form of learning habituation: the memory trace for inhibition.. the memory trace. ... 0 100

inhomogeneities from simplest from the memory trace

~ habit formation (?) William James: habit formation as the simplest form of learning

habituation: the memory trace for inhibition..

the memory trace

Page 7: Dynamic Field Theory Part 4: the memory trace and preshape · formation as the simplest form of learning habituation: the memory trace for inhibition.. the memory trace. ... 0 100

mathematics of the memory trace

⇥mem u̇mem(x, t) = �umem(x, t) +

�dx� wmem(x � x�)�(u(x�, t))

⇥ u̇(x, t) = �u(x, t) + h + S(x, t) + umem(x, t)

+

�dx� w(x � x�) �(u(x�))

1

⇥mem u̇mem(x, t) = �umem(x, t)

+

�dx� wmem(x � x�)�(u(x�, t))

⇥ u̇(x, t) = �u(x, t) + h + S(x, t) + umem(x, t)

+

�dx� w(x � x�) �(u(x�))

1

memory trace only evolves while activation is excited

potentially different growth and decay rates

Page 8: Dynamic Field Theory Part 4: the memory trace and preshape · formation as the simplest form of learning habituation: the memory trace for inhibition.. the memory trace. ... 0 100

Wilimzig, Schöner 2006

slow

fast

Page 9: Dynamic Field Theory Part 4: the memory trace and preshape · formation as the simplest form of learning habituation: the memory trace for inhibition.. the memory trace. ... 0 100

memory trace reflects history of decisions formation

020

4060

805

1015

200

20

020

4060

805

1015

00.20.4

memorytrace

dimension

activation

time

dimension

time

Page 10: Dynamic Field Theory Part 4: the memory trace and preshape · formation as the simplest form of learning habituation: the memory trace for inhibition.. the memory trace. ... 0 100

categories may emerge ...

Wilimzig, Schöner 2006

Page 11: Dynamic Field Theory Part 4: the memory trace and preshape · formation as the simplest form of learning habituation: the memory trace for inhibition.. the memory trace. ... 0 100

preshape

is a decisive concept, it turns out, in how selection decisions are studied in the laboratory

Page 12: Dynamic Field Theory Part 4: the memory trace and preshape · formation as the simplest form of learning habituation: the memory trace for inhibition.. the memory trace. ... 0 100

reaction time (RT) paradigm

time

imperative signal=go signal

response

RT

task set

Page 13: Dynamic Field Theory Part 4: the memory trace and preshape · formation as the simplest form of learning habituation: the memory trace for inhibition.. the memory trace. ... 0 100

the task set

is the critical factor in such studies of selection: which perceptual/action alternative/choices are available…

e.g., how many choices

e.g., how likely is each choice

e.g., how “easy” are the choices to recognize/perform

because the task set is known to the participant prior to the presentation of the imperative signal, one may think of the task set as a “preshaping” of the underlying representation (pre=before the decision)

Page 14: Dynamic Field Theory Part 4: the memory trace and preshape · formation as the simplest form of learning habituation: the memory trace for inhibition.. the memory trace. ... 0 100

DFT: preshape

movemen

t

param

eter

time

activation

1.0

taskinput

movement parameter

0.0preshapedfield

-0.4 0.0

preshapedfield

specific inputarrives

specific input

Page 15: Dynamic Field Theory Part 4: the memory trace and preshape · formation as the simplest form of learning habituation: the memory trace for inhibition.. the memory trace. ... 0 100

weak preshape in selection

specific (imperative) input dominates and drives detection instability

[Wilimzig, Schöner, 2006]

0

500

1000

1500

0

parameter, x

time,

t

activ

atio

n u(

x)

specific input + boostin different conditions

preshape

0

2

4

parameter, x

S(x)

-20

-10

0

10

u(x)

parameter, x

boost

Page 16: Dynamic Field Theory Part 4: the memory trace and preshape · formation as the simplest form of learning habituation: the memory trace for inhibition.. the memory trace. ... 0 100

using preshape to account for classical RT data

Hick’s law: RT increases with the number of choices

-4

-3

-4

-3

-4

-3

-4

-3

200 300 400 500 600

05

10

parameter, x

time, t

pres

hape

d u(

x)u m

ax(t)

1 2 4 8

[Erlhagen, Schöner, Psych Rev 2002]

Page 17: Dynamic Field Theory Part 4: the memory trace and preshape · formation as the simplest form of learning habituation: the memory trace for inhibition.. the memory trace. ... 0 100

metric effect

predict faster response times for metrically close than for metrically far choices

0 45 90 135 180

150 200 250 300 350 400 450-4

-2

0

2

4

time

pres

hape

d ne

ural

fiel

d

movement direction

peak

leve

l of a

ctiv

atio

n

wide

narrow

[from Schöner, Kopecz, Erlhagen, 1997]

faster

slower

Page 18: Dynamic Field Theory Part 4: the memory trace and preshape · formation as the simplest form of learning habituation: the memory trace for inhibition.. the memory trace. ... 0 100

experiment: metric effect

[McDowell, Jeka, Schöner ]

Page 19: Dynamic Field Theory Part 4: the memory trace and preshape · formation as the simplest form of learning habituation: the memory trace for inhibition.. the memory trace. ... 0 100

-4

-3

-2

0

2

4

-4

-3

250 350 450 550-2

0

2

4

time

-4

-3

0

2

4

250 350 450 550time

250 350 450 550time

pres

hape

d ac

tivat

ion

field

mai

xmal

act

ivat

ion

movement parameter

same metrics, different probability different metrics, same probability

highprobability

highprobability

highprobability

lowprobabilitylow

probability

lowprobability

movement parameter movement parameter

[from Erlhagen, Schöner: Psych. Rev. 2002]

Page 20: Dynamic Field Theory Part 4: the memory trace and preshape · formation as the simplest form of learning habituation: the memory trace for inhibition.. the memory trace. ... 0 100

WideFrequent

WideRare

NarrowFrequent

NarrowRare

320

300

280

260

240

220

200

Target

7

6

5

4

3

2

1

0Wide

FrequentWideRare

NarrowFrequent

NarrowRare

Target

[from McDowell, Jeka, Schöner, Hatfield, 2002]

wide narrow

Reaction Time P300 Amplitude Fz

Tim

e (

ms)

Am

plitu

de (

mic

roV

)

rarerare

frequent

frequent

Page 21: Dynamic Field Theory Part 4: the memory trace and preshape · formation as the simplest form of learning habituation: the memory trace for inhibition.. the memory trace. ... 0 100

this was: weak preshape relative to the imperative stimulus

specific (imperative) input dominates and drives detection instability

[Wilimzig, Schöner, 2006]

0

500

1000

1500

0

parameter, x

time,

t

activ

atio

n u(

x)

specific input + boostin different conditions

preshape

0

2

4

parameter, x

S(x)

-20

-10

0

10

u(x)

parameter, x

boost

Page 22: Dynamic Field Theory Part 4: the memory trace and preshape · formation as the simplest form of learning habituation: the memory trace for inhibition.. the memory trace. ... 0 100

strong preshape relative to the imperative stimulus

[Wilimzig, Schöner, 2006]

Page 23: Dynamic Field Theory Part 4: the memory trace and preshape · formation as the simplest form of learning habituation: the memory trace for inhibition.. the memory trace. ... 0 100

=> field responds categorically

[Wilimzig, Schöner, 2006]

Page 24: Dynamic Field Theory Part 4: the memory trace and preshape · formation as the simplest form of learning habituation: the memory trace for inhibition.. the memory trace. ... 0 100

categorical responding

based on categorical memory trace and boost-driven detection instability

Page 25: Dynamic Field Theory Part 4: the memory trace and preshape · formation as the simplest form of learning habituation: the memory trace for inhibition.. the memory trace. ... 0 100

distance effect

common in categorical tasks… e.g., decide which of two sticks is longer => RT is larger when sticks are more similar in length (1930s’)

Page 26: Dynamic Field Theory Part 4: the memory trace and preshape · formation as the simplest form of learning habituation: the memory trace for inhibition.. the memory trace. ... 0 100

interaction metrics-probability

Wilimzig, Schöner, 2006

opposite to that predicted for input-driven detection instabilities:

metrically close choices show larger effect of probability

0 100 200 300-20246

time, t

max

imal

activ

atio

n

0 100 200 300

parameter, x0

1

2

3

parameter, x

S(x)

time, ttime, t0 100 200 300

more probablechoice

less probablechoice

more probablechoice

less probablechoice

0

10

20

30

40

% e

rror

s

more probablechoice

less probablechoice

parameter, x

same metrics, different probability different metrics, same probability

Page 27: Dynamic Field Theory Part 4: the memory trace and preshape · formation as the simplest form of learning habituation: the memory trace for inhibition.. the memory trace. ... 0 100

Behavioral evidence for preshapemovement preparation is graded and continuous in time starting out from preshaped representations

timemove on 4th to tone

imperative stimulus

imposed SR interval

timed movement initiation paradigm

[Ghez and colleagues, 1988 to 1990’s]

Page 28: Dynamic Field Theory Part 4: the memory trace and preshape · formation as the simplest form of learning habituation: the memory trace for inhibition.. the memory trace. ... 0 100

Behavioral evidence for preshape

[Favilla et al. 1989]

Page 29: Dynamic Field Theory Part 4: the memory trace and preshape · formation as the simplest form of learning habituation: the memory trace for inhibition.. the memory trace. ... 0 100

\

Page 30: Dynamic Field Theory Part 4: the memory trace and preshape · formation as the simplest form of learning habituation: the memory trace for inhibition.. the memory trace. ... 0 100

Behavioral evidence for preshape

0

20

40

60

0

20

40

60

125 75 25

0

20

40

60

0

20

40

60

0

20

40

60

125 75 25

0

20

40

60

Peak Force (N)

Dis

trib

ution o

f P

eak F

orc

es

Experimental results of Henig et al

short

SR

interval

medium

SR

interval

short

SR

interval

Page 31: Dynamic Field Theory Part 4: the memory trace and preshape · formation as the simplest form of learning habituation: the memory trace for inhibition.. the memory trace. ... 0 100

Dynamic Field Theory (DFT)

[Erlhagen, Schöner. 2002, Psychological Review 109, 545–572 (2002)]

theoretical account: movement parameters are represented in dynamic neural activation fields

0

100

200

0

100

200

0

100

200

0

100

200

0

100

200

0

100

200

0

100

200

0

100

200

Amplitude value

Num

ber

of tr

ials

theoretical account for Henig et al.

zero

SR

interval

short

SR

interval

medium

SR

interval

long

SR

interval

0

20

40

60

0

20

40

60

125 75 25

0

20

40

60

0

20

40

60

0

20

40

60

125 75 25

0

20

40

60

Peak Force (N)

Dis

trib

ution o

f P

eak F

orc

es

Experimental results of Henig et al

short

SR

interval

medium

SR

interval

short

SR

interval

Page 32: Dynamic Field Theory Part 4: the memory trace and preshape · formation as the simplest form of learning habituation: the memory trace for inhibition.. the memory trace. ... 0 100

place with minimal changes in the hand paths. Table 1shows the means and standard errors of curvature andlinearity indices (see Materials and methods) across sub-jects (n = 5) for predictable targets and for each time in-terval for unpredictable targets. Small increases in curva-ture of 1°–2° and reductions in linearity occur amongmovements initiated between 80 and 200 ms after targetpresentation. However, all values are well within therange of normal values for linearity in reaching move-ments (e.g. Atkeson and Hollerbach 1985; Georgopoulos1988a, b; Georgopoulos and Massey 1988; Gordon et al.1994b). Moreover, as can be noted among the hand pathsillustrated in Fig. 5, change in direction associated withcurvature did not appreciably reduce the directional errorat the end point. Similarly, the improvement in accuracywas not achieved through variations in movement time.

Those data will, however, be considered in greater detailbelow when the systematic effects of target separation onmovement time are described (see Fig. 10).

Threshold target separationfor discrete directional specification

Figure 7 shows the distributions of initial movement di-rections in one subject at five target separations andsmoothed for clarity. Data from the same three succes-sive S-R time interval bins used in earlier figures areshown in different line types. For the 30° degree targetseparation, at S-R intervals ≤ 80 ms (dotted line and his-togram to show effect of smoothing) initial directions aredistributed unimodally around the midpoint of the range

224

Fig. 7 Experiment 2. Distribu-tions of movement directions atthe time of peak acceleration inone subject for five target sepa-rations. In each plot, distribu-tions were fitted with a smoothline using a cosine function(Chambers et al. 1983). The ar-rows on the x-axis point to therequired direction for each tar-get separation. In the top plot,the actual histogram for re-sponses with S-R intervals≤ 80 ms is displayed to demon-strate the relationship of the fit-ted line to the actual distribu-tion. On the right side of eachplot, the actual target locationsare displayed for reference &/fig.c:

[Ghez et al 1997]

infer width of preshape peaks in field

behavioral evidence for preshape

Page 33: Dynamic Field Theory Part 4: the memory trace and preshape · formation as the simplest form of learning habituation: the memory trace for inhibition.. the memory trace. ... 0 100

behavioral evidence for preshape

0

50

100

0

50

100

0

50

100

0

50

100

0

50

100

0

50

100

Num

ber

of t

rial

s

parameter, x

0

50

100

0

50

100

0

50

100

0

50

100

0

50

100

0

50

100

rare frequent rare frequentprobability in timed movement initiation

short SR interval: observe preshape

long SR interval: observe stimulus-defined

movement plan

rare frequentGhez et al, 1997

Page 34: Dynamic Field Theory Part 4: the memory trace and preshape · formation as the simplest form of learning habituation: the memory trace for inhibition.. the memory trace. ... 0 100

Neural evidence for preshape

[Bastian, Riehle, Schöner: Europ J Neurosci 18: 2047 (2003)]

movementdirection

precue

responsesignal

PS250

500750

RS

45

61

23

0

0.5

1

time [ms]

movement direction

activ

atio

n

completeprecue0 60 120 180 240 300 360

activ

atio

n

movement direction required in this trial

movement direction

Distribution of population activation =tuning curve * current firing rate

neurons

[after Bastian, Riehle, Schöner, submitted]

Page 35: Dynamic Field Theory Part 4: the memory trace and preshape · formation as the simplest form of learning habituation: the memory trace for inhibition.. the memory trace. ... 0 100

PS RSPS RS

lili0231

123

45 6

Complete Information

PS RSPS RS

lili022 1

123

45 6

Two-target Information

PS RSPS RS

lili024 1

123

45 6

Three-target Information

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

! HIIJ K)4).%01*, *+ #-.*')%, L)-.*:/1),/) A*/1)01):< !"#$%&'( )$"#('* $+ ,&"#$-./&(.&< !"< HIMNOHI!P

HI!H Q" R%:01%, &0 '*1

!"#$%&&%' () *#+#" $#"+%,- ./% %,!%"(*%)+01 !0"0'(2* 30"(%' +/%"0)2% #4 *#3%*%)+ '("%$+(#)& 5/($/ 5%"% !"%$6%' !"(#" +# +/%"%&!#)&% &(2)01 +/0+ &!%$(7%' #)% #4 +/%*- ./% 0$+(3(+(%& #4 )%6"#)&() *#+#" $#"+%, 5%"% 6&%' +# %&+(*0+% '(&+"(86+(#)& #4 !#!610+(#)0$+(30+(#) 9:;<&= '%7)%' #3%" +/% &!0$% #4 !#&&(81% *#3%*%)+'("%$+(#)&- ./% &/0!% #4 +/%&% :;<& 0)' +/%(" +%*!#"01 %3#16+(#)&

PS RS

1234561

Complete information

targ

ets

A

PS RS

1234561

Two-target informationB

targ

ets

PS 200 400 600 800 RS 1200

6123456

Three-target informationC

targ

ets

L

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

PS500

RS1500

56123402468

10

time (ms)

Complete information

targets

A

popu

latio

n ac

tivat

ion

PS500

RS1500

56123402468

10

time (ms)

Two-target information

targets

B

popu

latio

n ac

tivat

ion

PS500

RS1500

56123402468

10

time (ms)

Three-target information

targets

C

popu

latio

n ac

tivat

ion

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

! FEES T%'%"0+(#) #4 Q6"#!%0) K%6"#&$(%)$% N#$(%+(%&A $%&'()*+ ,'%&+*- '. /)%&'012)+1)A !"A FEUPVFEM>

FEMU <- H0&+(0) )3 *-4

[Bastian, Schöner, Riehle 2003]

Page 36: Dynamic Field Theory Part 4: the memory trace and preshape · formation as the simplest form of learning habituation: the memory trace for inhibition.. the memory trace. ... 0 100

!"#$%&&%' () *#+#" $#"+%,- ./% %,!%"(*%)+01 !0"0'(2* 30"(%' +/%"0)2% #4 *#3%*%)+ '("%$+(#)& 5/($/ 5%"% !"%$6%' !"(#" +# +/%"%&!#)&% &(2)01 +/0+ &!%$(7%' #)% #4 +/%*- ./% 0$+(3(+(%& #4 )%6"#)&() *#+#" $#"+%, 5%"% 6&%' +# %&+(*0+% '(&+"(86+(#)& #4 !#!610+(#)0$+(30+(#) 9:;<&= '%7)%' #3%" +/% &!0$% #4 !#&&(81% *#3%*%)+'("%$+(#)&- ./% &/0!% #4 +/%&% :;<& 0)' +/%(" +%*!#"01 %3#16+(#)&

PS RS

1234561

Complete information

targ

ets

A

PS RS

1234561

Two-target informationB

targ

ets

PS 200 400 600 800 RS 1200

6123456

Three-target informationC

targ

ets

L

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

PS500

RS1500

56123402468

10

time (ms)

Complete information

targets

A

popu

latio

n ac

tivat

ionPS

500RS

1500

56123402468

10

time (ms)

Two-target information

targets

B

popu

latio

n ac

tivat

ion

PS500

RS1500

56123402468

10

time (ms)

Three-target information

targets

Cpo

pula

tion

activ

atio

n

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

! FEES T%'%"0+(#) #4 Q6"#!%0) K%6"#&$(%)$% N#$(%+(%&A $%&'()*+ ,'%&+*- '. /)%&'012)+1)A !"A FEUPVFEM>

FEMU <- H0&+(0) )3 *-4

DPA reflects prior information

[Bastian, Schöner, Riehle 2003]

Page 37: Dynamic Field Theory Part 4: the memory trace and preshape · formation as the simplest form of learning habituation: the memory trace for inhibition.. the memory trace. ... 0 100

DPA reflects prior information

!"#$ %&'()*+,- !" #$./ 01112. ",'34'56-+ 7), $*5, 86-9 43 *-*(:$,$ *$',;4'7,9 ),', <*$,9 4- * (6-,*' 4;765*( ,$765*74'/ =, 4<7*6-,969,-76>*( ',$?(7$ *-9 )*@, 7)?$ 9,>69,9 74 $76>8 74 7), 54', 6-7?676@,,$765*74' 9,$>'6<,9 6- 7), 5,7)49$ $,>764-.A), !"# 5*8,$ 6$ ;4$$6<(, 74 *$8 -,= B?,$764-$ *<4?7 7), -,?'4-*(

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

!"#$%&'() *+$ ,%-.$## -/ ,0%*'01 2-&$2$(* ,%$,0%0*'-(

A), 7,5;4'*((: >4-76-?4?$ *-9 $;*76*((: +'*9,9 ,@4(?764- 43 7),',;',$,-7*764- 43 54@,5,-7 96',>764- <: 5474' >4'7,M >*- <, 96',>7(:4<$,'@,9/ *$ 6((?$7'*7,9 6- T6+. S. A)6$ -,?'*( ',$?(7 6$ >4-$6$7,-7 =67)7), <,)*@64?'*( 4<$,'@*764-$ 43 Q),R !" #$. %011S2. A), *?7)4'$ $)4=,97)*7 <: 6->',*$6-+ 7), 765, 6-7,'@*( <,7=,,- 7), 6-34'5*76@, $765?(?$*-9 54@,5,-7 4-$,7/ 96$7'6<?764-$ 43 ;,'34'5,9 54@,5,-7 96',>764-$

,@4(@,9 >4-76-?4?$(: 6- 765, *-9 +'*9?*((: 6- ;*'*5,7'6>*( $;*>,/ *$(4-+ *$ 54@,5,-7 96',>764-$ =,', $;*>,9 *$ ),', *7 PL! *-+?(*'$,;*'*764-. "',$)*;6-+ 43 -,?'4-*( ',;',$,-7*764-$ 43 54@,5,-796',>764- =*$ * ;4$7?(*7, 43 7), 9:-*56> N,(9 7),4': 43 54@,5,-7;',;*'*764- %&'()*+,- I U>)4V-,'/ KLLK2. E,', =, ;'4@69, 96',>7-,?'4-*( $?;;4'7 34' 7)6$ *$$?5;764-.W- 4'9,' 74 9,7,>7 ',+?(*'676,$ 6- 7), ;',$)*;6-+ 43 7), -,?'4-*(

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

6->(?96-+ 7), YA ,;4>)/ 7), >4->,-7'*764- @*(?, =*$ $6+-6N>*-7(:)6+),' 7)*- <*>8+'4?-9 (,@,(/ 5,*-6-+ 7)*7 7), !"# =*$ *7 *-: 765,$7'?>7?',9. W-34'5*764- *<4?7 54@,5,-7 96',>764- >*- 7)?$ <, ',*9 4?73'45 7), ;',$)*;,9 !"# *7 *-: 765, 4->, 7), ;',>?, =*$ ;',$,-7,9/ *$96$>?$$,9 ,*'(6,'.U,>4-9/ !"#$ <,>*5, 6->',*$6-+(: 34>?$,9 *$ 7), ',$;4-$, $6+-*(

*;;'4*>),9 *-9 <,:4-9. A)?$/ 7), 6->',*$, 43 *>76@*764- =)6>) 4>>?'',9*7 7), $*5, 765, =*$ $;,>6N> 74 7), >4-7,-7$ 43 7), ',;',$,-7*764-.

PS 200 400 600 800 RS 200 MVT 2000

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

L

conc

entra

tion

A

//

//complete information2 target information3 target information

PS 200 400 600 800 RS 200 MVT 2000

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

J

conc

entra

tion

B

//

//

!"#$ 0L. A), >4->,-7'*764- 5,*$?', *$ * 3?->764- 43 765, 6- 7), >4-96764-$ 43 >45;(,7, 6-34'5*764- %$4(69 (6-,2/ 7=4O7*'+,7 6-34'5*764- %9*$),9 (6-,2 *-9 7)',,O7*'+,76-34'5*764- %9477,9 (6-,2 34' 54-8,: Z 6- %#2 *-9 7=4O7*'+,7 6-34'5*764- %9*$),9 (6-,2 *-9 7)',,O7*'+,7 6-34'5*764- %9477,9 (6-,2 6- 54-8,: [ 6- %G2. T4' 9,7*6($ $,,T6+. 1.

! KLL\ T,9,'*764- 43 &?'4;,*- X,?'4$>6,->, U4>6,76,$/ %&'()!#* +(&'*#$ (, -!&'(./0!*/!/ !"/ KL]S^KL_`

KL_P #. G*$76*- !" #$1

[Bastian, Schöner, Riehle 2003]

Page 38: Dynamic Field Theory Part 4: the memory trace and preshape · formation as the simplest form of learning habituation: the memory trace for inhibition.. the memory trace. ... 0 100

preshape correlates with RT

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

!"#$%&'()*&+ ,"%-""( %*" ./0 $(1 2"$3%&'( %&4"

H(E:#0 (! "%< BIJJIC "-4( -$9:(% '"-' -0 #6,*$'-0' 7$#'($#*0 +*$%(/#90-'#09 0(:$*0-8 -7'#4#'5 -/ K,$(,-$-'*$5L #/ #'/ 7-,-7#'5 '* -77(8@

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

500 250 MVT 250

L

PS 250 500 750 RS 12500

0.2

0.4

0.6

conc

entra

tion

A

500 250 MVT 250

J

PS 250 500 750 RS 12500

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8co

ncen

tratio

nB fast RTs

slow RTs

!"#$ II< !"( 123/ )($( 7-87:8-'(% /(,-$-'(85 +*$ '$#-8/ )#'" +-/' $(-7'#*0 '#6(/ B/*8#% 8#0(/C -0% /8*) $(-7'#*0 '#6(/ B%*''(% 8#0(/C& -4($-9(% *4($ -88 '"$(( '-/.7*0%#'#*0/ +*$ 6*0.(5 ] B#0 3C& -0% '"( ')* ,-$'#-8 #0+*$6-'#*0 7*0%#'#*0/ #0 6*0.(5 ^ B#0 \C< D$*6 '"(/(& '"( 7*07(0'$-'#*0 6(-/:$( #/ /"*)0 -/ - +:07'#*0 *+ '#6(B>#0/! I__6/C< 3' '"( 8(+'& %-'- )($( -8#90(% '* /#90-8 *77:$$(07( -0% -' '"( $#9"' '* 6*4(6(0' *0/('< (̀$'#7-8 8#0(/ #0%#7-'( '"( *77:$$(07(/ *+ '"( ,$(,-$-'*$5 /#90-8B2RC -0% '"( $(/,*0/( /#90-8 BHRC -/ )(88 -/ 6*4(6(0' *0/(' BT`!C< !#6( #/ #0 6/<

! a__W D(%($-'#*0 *+ b:$*,(-0 =(:$*/7#(07( R*7#('#(/& )$&*+(", -*$&,"% *. /($&*'01(,0(& !"& a_YPca_XV

d*$'#7-8 $(,$(/(0'-'#*0/ *+ 6*4(6(0' ,$(,-$-'#*0 a_XP

[Bastian, Schöner, Riehle 2003]

Page 39: Dynamic Field Theory Part 4: the memory trace and preshape · formation as the simplest form of learning habituation: the memory trace for inhibition.. the memory trace. ... 0 100

DPA experiment DFT model

an estimation procedure through which a distribu-tion of activation over the movement parameter‘direction’ can be constructed. (2) The notion ofpreshaping of neural representations is employed tosearch for specific use of prior information. Byextrapolating the estimation procedure for popula-tion representations into periods in which incompleteinformation about movement direction is available,the preshaping of these representations can beobserved. (3) To detect experimentally suchpreshaping, the amount and metric range of priorinformation is varied by precueing either one, twoor three adjacent movement targets.

Materials and Methods

A monkey (Macaca mulatta) was trained to performpointing movements. It was cared for in the mannerdescribed in the Guiding Principles in the Care and

Use of Animals of the American Physiological Society.The animal sat in a primate chair in front of a verticalpanel on which seven touch sensitive light emittingdiodes (LED) were mounted, one in the center andsix equidistantly on a circle around the center. A trialstarted when the center target was illuminated. Theanimal had to touch the center target and wait forthe preparatory signal (PS), consisting of the illumi-nation of one or several targets in green. After apreparatory period (PP) of 1 s, one of the greentargets turned red, thus providing a response signal(RS), which instructed the animal to release the centerbutton and to point at the specified target. Threedifferent types of prior information were presented:(i) complete information in which a single target wasilluminated; (ii) partial information with two adjacenttargets illuminated; (iii) partial information with threeadjacent targets illuminated. Each of the three typesof prior information was presented in a separate blockof about 120 trials. Within each block, all possiblemovement directions were presented randomly.

After training, the animal was prepared forsurgery. A circular recording chamber was placedunder halothane anesthesia (< 0.5% in air) over thedorsal premotor cortex contralaterally to the taskperforming arm. A T-bar was fixed on the skull in order to immobilize the animal’s head during the experimental session. A multi-electrode micro-drive (Reitboeck device, Uwe Thomas Recording,Marburg) was used to transdurally insert sevenindependently driven micro-electrodes (impedance1–4 M! at 1 kHz) into the motor cortex. Actionpotentials of single neurons were recorded extracel-lularly and isolated using a window discriminator.Only neurons that changed significantly (one-factoranalysis of variance) their activity as a function ofmovement direction during reaction time (time fromthe occurrence of the RS until the initiation of move-ment observed as the release of the center button),or during movement time (time from the initiationof movement until the hand touches the target) wereselected for the further analysis at the populationlevel. The activity of 40 of 56 neurons (71%) recordedin the condition of complete information, 46 of 57neurons (81%) recorded in the condition of partialinformation with a precue of two targets, and 41 of49 neurons (84%) recorded in the condition of partialinformation with a precue of three targets reachedstatistical significance.

The construction of a population representation of movement direction is technically similar to the

A. Bastian et al.

1111234567891011112345678920111123456789301111234567894011112345678950111123456111p

316 Vol 9 No 2 26 January 1998

FIG. 1. The dynamic field model of movement preparation repre-sents the movement parameter ‘direction’ ("), by an activation field,u("). Peaks of activation represent the parameter value at whichthey are localized. The field evolves continuously in time as governedby a dynamic system:

#uu. (",t) = – u(",t) + !w(" – ") f (u(",t)) d"$+v(t) + h(t) + S(",t)

#vv.(t) = – v(t) + c!f(u(",t))d"

Sensory information associated with the preparatory signal, PS, andthe response signal, RS, is modelled as localized excitatory input,S(",t) and global excitatory input, h(t). Interaction within the field(local excitation, global inhibition, w(" – ")) stabilizes a single local-ized peak of activation as the target state of the field. The activa-tion induced by input stimulation is transiently suppressed again byan inhibitory process, v(t). The figure shows the temporal evolutionof the activation field in two cases. (A) When the preparatory signalspecifies completely the movement direction (at target 3), the corre-sponding input preshapes the field at the specified location. Theresponse signal drives this localized peak transiently to higher levelsof activation. (B) When, by contrast, the preparatory signal speci-fies two neighboring targets (at targets 3 and 4) the field is morebroadly preshaped and its maximum is centered on the average ofthe two precued movement directions. The response signal nowleads not only to an increase of activation, but also to a shift of thepeak location toward the specified target (target 3) and a sharpeningof the distribution.

methods used by Georgopoulos and colleagues9 toconstruct the population code, although the goalpersued with this construction is different. Inquiriesinto population code typically ask which movementparameters are represented by populations of neuronsin motor cortex. Although movement direction isclearly coded for in motor cortex, neural firing mayalso depend on parameters such as movement extent,arm configuration, or shoulder joint angle.10–12 Wesimply conclude from the tuning of single neuronsto movement direction that motor cortical neuronscontribute to the represention of that parameter,among the potentially many other representationsthat they might contribute to. To inquire aboutmovement direction, we projected from thispotentially high-dimensional space onto the axisrepresenting movement direction, !. This can be done by constructing a population distribution ofactivation defined over the space of movement direc-tions. The distribution was built from basis functions,which we chose as the tuning curves of each neuron.By weighting (multiplying) the tuning curve with thecurrent firing rate, population representations wereconstructed for the various experimental conditionsand at different points in time. Specifically, for eachof the three types of prior information (complete,two-target, three-target), a population representationwas constructed for each value of the preparatory andresponse signal, that is, for each possible direction.The combination of targets presented as preparatoryand response signal is designated in the formula as‘configuration’.

The mathematical definition reads

uconfiguration(!,t) = " tuningi(!)#firingrateconfiguration(i,t)neurons i

where the index i indicates the individual neurons inthe population. The firing rate of neuron i in a partic-ular configuration was obtained by averaging withina time slice beginning at time t. Thus, the populationrepresentation could be estimated as a function oftime. A normalization factor was introduced tosmooth the density at which the parameter ‘move-ment direction’ was sampled by the preferred direc-tions of the cells. The tuning curves were obtainedfrom neural firing rates averaged over the reactiontime interval. Note that computing the populationrepresentation during the reaction time interval isthus somewhat tautological, but extrapolating thisestimator into other periods is not.

Means were computed from the populationrepresentation by treating it as a probability distrib-ution and using circular statistics.13 The width of thepopulation representation was obtained by using theconcentration measure of circular statistics. Becausethe population representation is unnormalized, the

concentration was calculated after the areas under the population distributions at different configura-tions were all equaled by adding or subtractingappropriate constants.

Population representations of movement directionwere computed on the basis of the recorded activityof 40 neurons for the condition of complete infor-mation and 22 neurons for each of the two condi-tions of partial information.

ResultsThe temporal evolution of the population represen-tation is shown for the condition of completeinformation (Fig. 2A) and for the condition of twotarget information (Fig. 2B). The following state-ments hold true for all movement directions: (1)Neuronal activation increased in response to thepreparatory signal and in response to the responsesignal. After a first maximum of activity following

Representation of movement direction in motor cortex

1111234567891011112345678920111123456789301111234567894011112345678950111123456111p

Vol 9 No 2 26 January 1998 317

FIG. 2. The population representation of movement direction asconstructed from neural responses of a population of motor corticalcells is shown when complete prior information (A, target 3 wasprecued at PS and specified at RS) and two target prior information(B, targets 3 and 4 were precued at PS and target 3 was specifiedat RS) is provided. The time slices for the computation of the popu-lation distribution are 100 ms. Note how the population distributionis preshaped in response to the preparatory signal. Location andwidth of activation reflect the range and contents of prior informa-tion. If complete information is provided (A) the activation peak islocalized over the precued target during the preparatory period andthe distribution increases in activation and sharpens subsequent tothe RS. At two target prior information (B), the preshaped distribu-tion is centered broadly on the precued range, whereas after presen-tation of the RS its peak shifts towards the specified value whilesharpening.

[Bastian, Riehle, Erlhagen, Schöner, 98]