edd/581 action research proposal rosalyn m. reed
DESCRIPTION
EDD/581 Action Research Proposal Rosalyn M. Reed. Problem Statement. The problem is the lack of leadership development for non-managerial employees. Upon recognizing the need and the desire for leadership development, a proposed leadership development program will be implemented. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
EDD/581 ACTION RESEARCH
PROPOSALROSALYN M. REED
1Action Research Proposal
Problem Statement
Action Research Proposal
2
The problem is the lack of leadership development for
non-managerial employees. Upon recognizing the need and
the desire for leadership development, a proposed leadership
development program will be implemented.
Problem Description
Action Research Proposal
3
Employees are promoted for numerous reasons within the
corporations of America. Some employees elevate
themselves based upon their knowledge of their company’s
industry. Others rely on their decades of service and
commitment to their current employer. Regardless of which
upward route a person chooses, few are promoted without
effective leadership skills.
As a company, we pride ourselves on promoting from
within; however, many current employees have found
themselves to be inadequate when reading the internal job
postings.
Problem Description Cont.
Action Research Proposal
4
These postings state that leadership skills are preferred
for lateral positions and required for vertical positions.
Although our company has an extensive leadership and
development program, this instruction is reserved for
manager/senior manager/director positions. This top tier
leadership instruction does not come without a price. A 3-day
leadership workshop retails for $19951 per person according
to Franklincovey.com (2014). With over 300 non-managerial
day shift employees and our 24-hour operation, it is
Problem Description Cont.
Action Research Proposal
5
understandable that cost is a factor in determining who
attends the available leadership workshops.
If effective leadership built this company and aided its
reputation as an industry benchmark, then effective
leadership will be the key to its future success. Employees in
many departments boast of having reached their 25th
anniversary with the company; however, many of these
veterans are not qualified for vertical promotions due to their
lack of leadership development.
Problem Description Cont.
Action Research Proposal
6
Non-managerial employees may not need the most
expensive leadership development; however, if the company
desires to continue with its internal promotions, then
leadership development is needed for all employees. By
providing all employees with leadership development, all
employees will contribute to the company’s future, expand its
lateral foundation, and help it to hold firmly to its global
reputation as an industry leader.1Training & Events | Calendar. (n.d.). FranklinCovey. Retrieved February 23, 2014, from
http://www.franklincovey.com/tc/events/calendar
Purpose of the Project
Action Research Proposal
The purpose of this project is to provide concrete evidence
of the benefits of a leadership and development program for
non-managerial employees. This project will further
determine the most cost effective methods of leadership
development for the corporation while showing various
methods of effective instruction for the employees.
7
Writer’s Role
Action Research Proposal
8
As a 14-year veteran of ___ and a 3-year veteran of our
former self, ___, I have seen the internal and external growth
of our corporation. With these many years of service, I have
also seen many veteran employees – my peers and myself –
remain in the same positions. Many have received a lateral
shuffle; many more have left the company in search of
opportunities elsewhere. As a college graduate and future
graduate student, I look forward to future possibilities with
this company. My desire is to assist our company
Writer’s Role Cont.
Action Research Proposal
9
with meeting the leadership and development desires of
my peers while it benefits from the leadership of an
effectively equipped staff. Today’s employees must be
prepared to continue the legacy of our corporation’s
reputation.
Problem Documentation
Action Research Proposal
10
In the past 5 years, _____ company has offered more than 500 full- or part-time positions. The breakdown of these positions is as follows:+ 500 of the positions have been filled+ 275 of the positions were filled by women+ 225 of the positions were filled by men- ½ of the positions were filled by external candidates- ¾ of the positions were filled by people with prior leadership and development training- ¼ of the applicants had received no prior leadership and development training
These figures have been adjusted due to privacy laws; therefor, no citation is provided.
Problem Documentation
Action Research Proposal
11
Clearly, _____ company offers numerous positions to their
existing employees; however, without essential leadership and
development training, many of the current employees are being
overlooked for these positions. Only those persons qualified for the
positions will receive an interview because _____ company utilizes a
point system screening process for all applicants. Roughly 80% of all
internal applicants received interviews for these positions. This
means that, on paper, these applicants passed the pre-interview
screening. The question remains, what was lacking from the internal
applicants that prevented so many from receiving the positions
applied for?
Problem Documentation
Action Research Proposal
12
What form of leadership and development have you previously experienced?
How has this training helped your personal or professional development?
What is your definition of a leader? What does the phrase ‘natural-born-leader’ mean to you? What would be the personal benefits of future leadership &
development? What would be the professional benefits of future leadership &
development? Do you currently hold any leadership position[s]? If so, what is
the position and where? If you currently hold a leadership position, what ongoing
leadership training are you receiving? If a professional leadership class [or classes] was offered in your
workplace, would you desire to attend? What would you like for a workshop leadership curriculum to
teach?
Problem Documentation
Action Research Proposal
13
Each of the below options will allow for decreased biasness as the collected data will be used to accurately depict what current employees desire from leadership and development training. No attempt will be made to sway responses or to force participants into mandated training.
Option [1] includes an equal number of participants who have and have not received leadership and development training and their respective surveys.
-OR- Option [2] includes a range of focus group participants [from no
leadership and development training to ongoing leadership and development training] and their respective surveys.
Literature Review
Action Research Proposal
14
Literature Review A literature review should summarize all
important research relevant to the problem, demonstrating a current understanding of the topic.
You should have at least seven literature references.
List your literature review in the following format:Authors of the study
Title of the study
Purpose of the study
Pertinent findings that support your project
Literature Review
Action Research Proposal
15
Authors of the study
Title of the study
Purpose of the study
Pertinent findings that support your project
No author Developing Leaders To transform people and organizations in an effective manner
• Leadership should be developed at all levels
Efron, Louis Six reasons your best employees quit you
To teach employers why the average employee’s tenure is now averaging only 1.5 years
• The top 6 reasons for employees leaving a company have nothing to do with money
• Effective leadership attracts and retains effective employees
Selley, Nicole 10 reasons why employees really leave their jobs
To teach employers how to effectively process the truth received from employees during their exit interviews
• Exit interviews should be taken seriously
• The cost of developing current employees is lower than the cost of training new employees
• Employers must discontinue the thought that money is the key factor to an employee leaving
Literature Review
Action Research Proposal
16
Authors of the study
Title of the study
Purpose of the study
Pertinent findings that support your project
Brunone, Chris Leadership development vs. Employee engagement
To determine the best approach to training current employees
• Comparison between training the more senior employees vs the broader employee base
Naseer, Tanveer Leaders, are you developing employee’s super powers?
To teach leaders the importance of developing their employee’s superior strengths
• Leaders have to be developed in order to develop future leaders
• Leaders must know their leadership styles in order to know how to develop their teams
Heathfield, Susan M. Five factors every employee wants from work
To explain each of the five things that employees want
• 2 of 5 points relate to employees desiring leadership and development
Literature Review
Action Research Proposal
17
Authors of the study
Title of the study
Purpose of the study
Pertinent findings that support your project
Mitchell, T., Holtom, B., Lee T., Graske, T.
How to keep your best employees: Developing an effective retention policy
To make employers aware that keeping qualified employees is more involved than simply paying higher salaries
• People leave for reasons that may be unrelated to money
• People may remain due to attachments to their job and to their community
• The lack of promotion is often the most influential decision for leaving an organization
• Leaving a job costs both the employer and the former employee
Action GoalAction Goal Provide the goal for the intervention that you are purposing
and include a brief overview of the intervention plan that you have selected.
Example: The goal of the intervention is to increase effectiveness of
regular classroom teachers in implementing accommodations and modifications for special education students. A three-prong intervention will be implemented to meet the goal, which includes teacher IEP training, teacher/paraprofessional training, and weekly collaboration time supported by the administration.
18
Action Research Proposal
Action GoalAction Goal
The goal of the intervention is to provide substantiated proof of the benefits of leadership and development training for the company and for all current employees – regardless of employment position. A three-tier intervention will be implemented to show the positive attributes of leadership and development training that include employee surveys, documented evidence of the company’s promotional policies, and the long-term benefits of leadership and development training for all employees. The results of which will be presented to the leadership and development team for review and consideration.
19
Action Research Proposal
Selected Solutions Selected Solutions Pre-Work
Assign informed assistants to explain the survey process to each chosen department
Explain, distribute, and collect the confidentiality forms Appendix 1.1
Explain, distribute, and collect the completed employee surveys Appendix 1.2
Reinforce the confidentiality agreement
20
Action Research Proposal
Selected Solutions Selected Solutions Tier 1 – Employee Survey
At least 5 departments of employees, minimum of 10 people each, will complete a detailed and confidential survey designed to delve into the subject of leadership and development. The desire is for at least 10 groups of surveyors. Survey topics should include: Length of time with the company Leadership and development received internally and externally Possible promotions sought within the company Specific ways in which leadership and development training could
improve their professional careers Specific ways in which leadership and development training could
improve their personal endeavors.
21
Action Research Proposal
Selected Solutions Selected Solutions Tier 2 – Company’s Leadership & Development Policy
The company has developed and maintains an extensive leadership university. While management is required to enroll, non-management employees are not able to participate at-will. The solution is to show: Employee’s commitment to the company Leadership and development benefits the company’s PSP [people-
service-profit] philosophy The costs of training current employees is less than the cost of
marketing and interviewing possible new hires Leadership and development motivates employees
22
Action Research Proposal
Selected Solutions Selected Solutions Tier 3 – Benefits of Leadership and Development
The company recognizes the need for leadership and development; however, has reserved this learning for management. This portion is to show that leadership and development: Enables employees to become more intelligent about the company
as a whole Equips employees to understand the requirements of management Gives employees interest beyond a salary Motivates employees to apply their leadership and development to
all aspects of their lives Encourages employees to increase personal productivity Prepares employees to become eligible for promotions
23
Action Research Proposal
Selected Solutions Selected Solutions Post-Work
Present the findings of the completed surveys to the management team of the leadership and development department for review
Present a PowerPoint presentation to the leadership and development management team
Set a proposed date to discuss and review the findings
24
Action Research Proposal
Calendar Plan25
Action Research Proposal
WEEK ONE • Gather leadership and development paperwork
• Create confidentiality forms• Meet with chosen department
managers to confirm availability • Give available time slots to each
chosen department manager for review Appendix 1.2
WEEK TWO • Select and inform assistants of the research
• Print and review confidentiality forms with assistants
• Confirm each department’s time slot
• Secure training roomsWEEK THREE • Set-up training rooms
• Present and collect surveys from each department
Calendar Plan26
Action Research Proposal
WEEK FOUR • Review surveys• Sort findings• If the findings are incomplete,
additional departments will be sought for additional surveys
WEEK FIVE • Submit completed findings and PowerPoint to the leadership and development management team
• Seek follow-up time for action research review
Expected Outcomes
Action Research Proposal
27
Expected Outcomes
Employees will provide specific examples of professional change as a result of leadership and development training in the following areas:• [1] increased productivity• [2] priority setting/attention to detail• [3] team building• [4] leadership
Expected Outcomes
Action Research Proposal
28
Expected Outcomes
[1] Increased productivity• Veteran employees (5+ years) should show
a 15-20% daily work increase • New employees (0 – 5 years) should show
a 5-10% daily work increase• Employees should have chosen 2
additional teams for cross training
Expected Outcomes
Action Research Proposal
29
Expected Outcomes
[2] Priority setting/Attention to detail
• Employees will develop a priority management scale to fit their workloads
• Employees will lower their error rates by 5% monthly
• Employees will learn to use available computer software calendar planning
Expected Outcomes
Action Research Proposal
30
Expected Outcomes
[3] Team building• Employees will learn to identify their
professional strengths • Employees will present developmental
plans to strengthen their weaknesses• Employees will develop prospective
teams for project handling
Expected Outcomes
Action Research Proposal
31
Expected Outcomes
[4] Leadership• Employees should re-answer the
following leadership survey questions using Appendix 1.3
Measurement of Outcomes
Action Research Proposal
32
Increased productivity • Employees will calculate their new production requirements based upon their length of time with the company
• Each employee will provide a proposed timeline for meeting the new production rates
Priority setting/Attention to detail
• Computer applications will be used to record the employee’s proposed to-do list
• Employees will gauge their proposed to-do lists against their actual completed accomplishments list
• Employee error rates will be tracked against their new production requirements
Measurement of Outcomes
Action Research Proposal
33
Team building • Employees in team-driven departments will be asked to share how their teams have aided/benefitted from their training*
• Employees in non-management positions will be asked for specific indicators of their training via online team building scenarios
Leadership • Completed leadership surveys will be discussed with each participant
• Answers will be used to determine and to develop future training classes
Analysis of Results
Action Research Proposal
34
The results will be analyzed by comparing employee performances before, during, and after leadership & development training. Rather than having a defined control and experimental group, each employee’s data will be treated as the control [pre] & experimental [after] group. How will I determine if the solution strategy was effective? An overall effective indicator will be determined by the percentage indicator determined on the current employee performance reviews: 4=>75% 3=75% 2=50% 1=25%
Analysis of Results
Action Research Proposal
35
How will I present my findings and to whom? The findings will be presented through anonymous employee production reports. After 3 weeks of production tallies, reviewed schedules, and error reports, each employee’s findings will be compared to their pre-leadership & development training results. This compiled report will be given to the management staff of the leadership & development team and to the managers of trained employees. Although all employee information will remain anonymous, the gathered data will be used to develop future leadership & development curriculums.
References
Action Research Proposal
36
Efron, L. (2013). Six reasons your best employees quit you. Forbes. Retrieved
March 31, 2014, from http://www.forbes.com/sites/louisefron/2013/06/24/six-
reasons-your-best- employees-quit-you/
Selley, N. (2013). 10 reasons why employees really leave their jobs. Retrieved
March 31, 2014, from http://www.insidebusiness360.com/index.php/10-
reasons-why-employees-really- leave-their-jobs-53/
Appendix 1.1
Action Research Proposal
37
Confidentiality survey
I, , a/an - year employee of Company F, have been explained the reason for this confidential survey. I understand that while my information will be made known, my identity will remain anonymous. My involvement with this survey is purely voluntary and serves only as research material for school-related research. I understand that in no manner am I obligated to benefit from any aspect of this survey’s results.
Employee’s printed name Employee’s signature Surveyor
Appendix 1.2
Action Research Proposal
38
Available Timeslots
MON SURVEY
TUES SURVEY
WED SURVEY
THUR SURVEY
FRI SURVEY
9:00 – 10:00 AM
9:00 – 10:00AM
9:00 – 10:00 AM
9:00 – 10:00AM
9:00 – 10:00AM
OR OR OR OR OR11:00 –
12:00 PM11:00 –
12:00 PM11:00 –
12:00 PM11:00 –
12:00 PM11:00 –
12:00 PM
Appendix 1.3
Action Research Proposal
39
How will this training help your personal or professional development?
What is your new definition of a leader? What does the phrase ‘natural-born-leader’ mean to you? What will be the personal benefits of this leadership &
development? What will be the professional benefits of this leadership &
development? Did this leadership curriculum teach objectives that you found
beneficial?