EDMS CRITICAL FUNCTIONALITY REPORT - FINAL

Prepared for:

Western Governors’ Association Western Regional Air Partnership

1515 Cleveland Place, Suite 200 Denver, CO 80202

Contract #30204-115

Prepared by:

and

Air Sciences Inc. 1301 Washington Avenue

Suite 200 Golden, CO 80401

March 14, 2007

Table of Contents Section Page

Executive Summary 1 1 Background 3 2 EDMS Requirements 3 3 General Analysis 3 3.1 Database Design 4 3.2 Database Content 5 3.3 Web Site Design 7 3.4 Application Code Design 8 3.5 Process and Data Flows 8 3.5.1 Data Submittal 8 3.5.2 Data Reporting Processes 10 4 EDMS Critical Functionality Analysis 11 4.1 Methods 11 4.2 Issues, Recommended Solutions, and Action Plan 12 5 Recommended Future Enhancements 15 5.1 Link the EDMS to the TSS 15 5.2 Host the EDMS at CIRA 16 Appendix A A-1

List of Figures Figure Page A-1 Database Schemas A-8 A-2 Area Emission Source Tables from the Pechan Data Model A-10 A-3 Activity Detail from the Pechan Data Model A-11 A-4 Inventory Tables from the Pechan Data Model A-12 A-5 Logging Tables from the Pechan Data Model A-13

i

List of Figures (continued) Figure Page A-6 Security Tables from the Pechan Data Model A-14 A-7 Automated Data Submittal Process A-26 A-8 Report Generation A-30

List of Tables Table Page

3-1 The Production Tables 7

3-2 The EDMS Upload Program 9 3-3 Assumed DBA Data Submittal Steps 9 3-4 On-Screen Displays and Export File Types 11 4-1 Critical and Major Issues 13 4-2 Minor and Trivial Issues 14 4-3 Other Action Items 15 A-1 EDMS Transition Requirements A-2 A-2 EDMS Requirements A-4 A-3 Inventory Version Description A-15 A-4 Older Inventory Checklist (Point Source Emissions) A-18 A-5 Older Inventory Checklist (Area Source Emissions) A-19 A-6 Older Inventory Checklist (Biogenics) A-20 A-7 Older Inventory Checklist (On-Road Mobile Emissions) A-20

ii

List of Tables (continued) Table Page A-8 Older Inventory Checklist (Non-Road Mobile Emissions) A-21 A-9 Inventory 9 Checklist (Point Source Emissions) Production Tables A-22 A-10 Inventory 9 Checklist (Area Source Emissions) Production Tables A-23 A-11 Inventory 9 Checklist (Biogenics) Production Tables A-24 A-12 Inventory 9 Checklist (On-Road Mobile Emissions) Production Tables A-24 A-13 Inventory 9 Checklist (Non-Road Mobile Emissions) Production Tables A-25

iii

Executive Summary Air Resource Specialists, Inc. (ARS), teaming with Air Sciences Inc., was awarded Contract #30204-115, effective November 6, 2006, for the WRAP EDMS Operations and Maintenance Project. Under this contract, ARS and Air Sciences will provide database and web site hosting, software fixes and enhancements, emissions data quality assurance and handling, and other miscellaneous consulting services through calendar year 2007. This Critical Functionality Report is a required deliverable of this contract (Task B). It contains a detailed overview of the team’s review of the Emissions Data Management System (EDMS) requirements, database/web interface structure and functionality, database content, recommended future enhancements, and a prioritized 2007 action plan. The EDMS is designed to be a warehouse of emissions data accessible to WRAP states and tribes via the Internet. Its major user-accessible features include: graphical and tabular predefined reports, an ad hoc reporting function, a mapping component, and the ability to upload data. Each of these features, except the data upload capability, was found to meet at least the minimum system requirements. However, the underlying database and web interface software, while generally functional, were found to have critical flaws that affect system performance, data quality, general user value, and system maintenance and enhancement. This report identifies these problems and recommends specific solutions. During the transfer of EDMS responsibilities from E.H. Pechan to ARS, multiple versions of code (not well-identified) were provided, but virtually no system level documentation. Therefore, the method used to gain an operational understanding of the EDMS has been a discovery process. Tables 4-1 and 4-2 present a detailed summary of all problems found, recommended solutions, and anticipated timing to complete. Table 4-3 presents other action items that are expected to occur in 2007. General findings and recommendations (with report section references) include:

• The critical functionality review began with an assessment of the EDMS requirements, as defined in various project documents prepared prior to ARS’ involvement. (Section 2)

• Overall, the EDMS was found to function at a minimally satisfactorily level as an emissions inventory data warehouse and web application to support emissions tracking for the WRAP. Users are able, for the most part, to navigate the web interface and retrieve the data they need. However, the EDMS database, as it currently exists, requires internal restructuring. (Section 3)

• The database was poorly designed, does not conform to standard practices, is missing some critical features and contains other extraneous features. It does not take full advantage of the inherent power and functionality of Oracle. Numerous restructuring and clean-up tasks are recommended. (Section 3.1)

• There are numerous distinct inventories currently loaded in the database and available to users. It is recommended that obsolete and training inventories be removed from the database. (Section 3.2)

1

• Some revisions exist for inventory 9, and inventory 10 is not in the production database. Identified revisions for inventory 9 should be added to the database, and inventory 10 should be QA’d and made available. (Section 3.2)

• In general the web site design is acceptable. It is relatively easy for a user to register and to navigate the site once activated. Only minor recommendations to enhance user experience are offered. (Section 3.3)

• The application code design is poor and does not conform to standard practices. It should be largely re-written to ensure reliability, scalability and maintainability. (Section 3.4)

• The data submittal process is extremely convoluted and only semi-functional. It is recommended that the entire process be revised and thoroughly documented. (Section 3.5)

• Potential future enhancements for the EDMS were identified and reviewed. The recommended methods for improving EDMS data review and analysis functionality are discussed largely in terms of a cost effective and straight forward linkage between the EDMS and the WRAP Technical Support System (TSS). The TSS is currently under development and will soon be capable of storing, analyzing, and presenting emissions data. (Section 5)

2

1 Background This Critical Functionality Report contains a detailed overview of a review of the Emissions Data Management System (EDMS) requirements, database/web interface structure and functionality, database content, recommended future enhancements, and a prioritized 2007 action plan. For the transfer of the EDMS database and web application from the University of Northern Carolina host site to the host site at ARS, the ARS team hoped to work with Pechan staff to make a smooth transition. However, Pechan was unable to provide a single, efficient transfer of the application in its entirety. Instead, the application was provided piecemeal, with ARS discovering through trial and error that pieces were missing and Pechan providing several versions of source code with little indication of the code’s status. Again, ARS was forced to employ a trial and error process in order to provide the EDMS at our host site with the highest amount of functionality possible. Table A-1 of the Appendix presents a summary list of EDMS components involved in the transition.

2 EDMS Requirements Many documents from the EDMS Project Web maintained by Pechan were reviewed in

an attempt to glean the system requirements. The following documents provided most of the requirements details for this report:

1. “Emissions Data Management System Design As Delivered Final Report” prepared

by E.H. Pechan, August 2006. 2. “EDMS Scope of Work Draft 3” prepared by E.H. Pechan, date unknown.

3. “Final Needs Assessment For Evaluation And Design Of An Emissions Data Reporting, Management, And Tracking System” prepared by EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, July 2003.

The collective requirements from these documents have been assembled in Table A-2 of

Appendix A. The requirements are categorized and the source documents noted as numbered above. The remarks column provides a brief assessment of the system’s ability to meet the requirement.

3 General Analysis Overall, the EDMS is a functioning emissions inventory data warehouse and web application that generally meets the application goal of providing regional emissions tracking for the WRAP. Users are able, for the most part, to navigate the web interface and retrieve the data they need. Internally, however, the EDMS is currently a jumble of database objects, Visual Basic code, Active Server Pages, and Javascript. Numerous empty and otherwise seemingly pointless

3

database objects exist, thousands of lines of code have been commented out and replaced with no indication of why, and hundreds of stored procedures exist where only a fraction are truly needed to do the work. This section discusses these types of specific design issues and provides recommended solutions. A section discussing the database content and steps taken to verify the validity of the content is also included.

3.1 Database Design The database was designed to accommodate the import and export of NIF formatted data and appears to be based on the NEI Staging Database Process developed by Pechan for the NEI. This process requires the data to pass through three QA/QC “stages” before moving to the final stage, the production tables. The stages are managed by individual schemas within the database. An Oracle schema is a collection of database objects owned by a database user and having the same name as that user (in this case, the database “users” are processes and not people). These users/schemas are named EDMS_TXR, EDMS_TXN, EDMS_STG and EDMS_PRD (the production tables). Additional schemas exist to house the web interface related database objects (such as the registered EDMS users, documents available for download, text that appears on certain web pages, etc.), a set of “lookup” tables (such as county, state, and tribal fips codes), and audit data for each stage. In addition to the emissions source tables, the EDMS_PRD schema contains a set of pre-generated summary tables that provide data to the user through the web interface. The only time data are retrieved directly from the production emission source tables is when the user has requested a NIF export file. The database schemas and their tables are presented in Figure A-1 of Appendix A.

At least 100 of the database tables contain no data, including the audit tables. Another 30 or so tables appear to be “temporary,” “test,” or “backup” tables as indicated by their names. Several sample database schemas and hundreds of their objects also exist. There are hundreds of indexes and views with no apparent purpose. Tables in the staging schemas (EDMS_TXR, EDMS_TXN, EDMS_STG), which should be empty according to Pechan’s close-out document, do contain a variety of data including data for Inventory 10.

According to Pechan’s documentation, “…fields specific to the EDMS data management

are appended to the existing NIF data management schema. These fields contain only keys, version indicators, and pointers to other data structures.” Unfortunately, the keys are contrived and the pointers are non-existent. Instead of using standard database techniques of creating primary keys, a sequence, insert trigger and update trigger exists for virtually every table. This technique is equivalent to applying the Autonumber data type to a table field in MS-Access and making it the primary key. It is an acceptable database tuning technique only if a unique composite index is also created for the table to prevent duplicate rows from occurring. No such unique indexes exist.

Absolutely no foreign key constraints that enforce the relational rules among tables exist.

Null constraints that prevent null values from occurring and check constraints to prevent out of range data from being inserted into a table are also virtually non-existent. Instead, a multitude of stored procedures exist to test submitted data to ensure it conforms to the rules. However, attempts to apply a couple of unique and foreign key constraints where they should be and a

4

quick check of production table data against just a few of the rules stated in the QA/QC document indicate that numerous rules are broken by data in the production tables. Some data in the EDMS production tables do not conform to the QA/QC requirements. Some of these problems are further illustrated in Figures A-2 through A-6 in the Appendix.

Other less critical problems also exist such as misspellings in table names (for example,

table names intended to contain the word “criteria” spelled “cretaria”) and inconsistent data types (dates sometimes stored as character data instead of date data).

Initial recommended solutions for the database include: • Removing sample and other nonessential tables and other objects.

• Applying primary key/unique, foreign key, and other constraints based on basic database design standards and QA/QC requirements to the production tables, resolving issues with the data that do not conform.

• Implementing additional changes based on re-evaluating the database audit requirements (possibly removing the audit schemas and objects and using the built-in Oracle audit capabilities).

• Implementing additional changes based on revision of the data submittal and QA/QC processes.

• Continuing to fully document the structure, purpose and relationships of all essential database objects.

3.2 Database Content Methods used to verify database content by inventory and the results found are discussed

in this section followed by an assessment of the production tables. The actual summaries are provided in Tables A-3 through A-13 of Appendix A. Early Inventory Versions

Data from older Inventories (1-7) included on the website were not reviewed for accuracy as there are no readily available external data sets for comparison. A description and summary of earlier datasets can be found in Tables A-4 through A-8 in Appendix A. Inventory 5 has been used for training purposes and should not be available to the data user as it contains erroneous data. Inventory 8 – Actual Version 1.2

No discrepancies were found when comparing Inventory 8 data from the Pechan Inventory Description files and data from the development and production databases. Inventory 9 – 2002 Final V-2.0

The following procedures were used in testing the accuracy of Inventory 9 data:

1. Data from the following sources were imported into an MS Access database: • Data exported using the standard reports on website

5

• Data on the website from the “snapshot file” • Inventory Description files from Pechan • Data exported from the development database • Data exported from the production database

2. Data for each emissions source type, from each source listed above, were compared

by state/tribe and pollutant for agreement. Data exported from the website and the snapshot files were found to be unreliable and outdated. Data from the development and production databases were identical. Therefore, comparisons focused on Inventory 9 description files from Pechan and data from the production database.

3. The Pechan Inventory Description files contain worksheets listing state/tribal totals

and worksheets with “revised” data. In cases where revised data were available, those were also compared to the production table data for accuracy.

The following assumptions were made for data to be deemed correct and complete for

Inventory 9:

1. State/Tribal totals reflect correct County totals (tons per year). 2. Inventory Description files from Pechan are correct.

• IDD_Inv9_point.xls • IDD_Inv9_area.xls • IDD_Inv9_mobile.xls • IDD_Inv9_offroad.xls • IDD_Inv9_Biogenics.xls

3. Values within 5 tons per year were considered correct, due to variation in rounding

and/or addition. A summary of Inventory 9 can be found in Tables A-9 through A-13 in the Appendix. Inventory 10 – 2018 and Additional 2002 Tribal Data for Inventory 9 Pechan’s closeout document states “[B]ecause of database disk space constraints, the data loads of the 2018 (Inventory 10) and the additional 2002 Tribal data for Inventory 9 that were received by Pechan after Inventory 9 was deemed complete were loaded onto the development/test database. The production application was modified to “look” into the development/test database for these data.” However, the Oracle export file received from Pechan claiming to contain the development/test database is identical to the emission source tables in the production database. Instead, some, but not all, of these data are found in the EDMS_TXN emission source tables. Since the soundness of the data submittal and QA/QC process is suspect (discussed in various other areas of this report) and the status of these data are undocumented, our recommendation is to delete these data from the EDMS_TXN tables and reload them once the data submittal QA/QC has been revised.

6

The Production Tables (EDMS_PRD schema) Table 3-1 broadly summarizes the content of the emissions source tables in the production schema. The last update date was determined by querying the latest created/modified date field in each table.

Table 3-1. The Production Tables

Table Description Row count Last update TR Transmittal table includes the transmittal

information for the other sets of tables 15,025 5/19/2006

AREA_EP Area Emission Process 105,0943 1/31/2006 AREA_PE Area Emission Period 1,122,247 1/31/2006 AREA_EM Area Emission 9,790,998 1/30/2006 AREA_CE Area Emission Control Equipment 911,860 1/31/2006 BIOGENIC_EM Biogenic Emission 34,580 1/24/2006 ONROAD_PE Onroad Emission Period 1,614,018 12/21/2005 ONROAD_EM Onroad Emission 9,931,914 1/30/2006 POINT_SI Point Site 200,209 10/31/2006 POINT_EU Point Emission Unit 950,209 11/20/2005 POINT_ER Point Emission Release Point 810,252 12/3/2005 POINT_EP Point Emission Process 1,196,412 10/31/2006 POINT_PE Point Emission Period 1,199,416 11/28/2005 POINT_EM Point Emission 3,907,207 11/28/2005 POINT_CE Point Control Equipment 766,461 11/28/2005 As mentioned above in Section 3.1, most EDMS web site data queries are filled by retrieving data from pre-generated tables that summarize the data found in the emission source tables (AREA_EM, BIOGENIC_EM, ONROAD_EM, and POINT_EM). The apparent method for creating these tables is the use of an Oracle data warehousing feature called Materialized Views. Regular views in a database create a “view” of data from one or more tables “on-the-fly” whenever they are accessed. A materialized view physically stores the resulting data from a view definition as a table. Since the result set already exists, queries on a materialized view are returned to the user much faster than a regular view. Of course, when data in one or more of the base tables that a materialized view is based on are updated, the materialized view becomes stale and must be regenerated. It appears from inspecting the code to create these materialized views that Pechan intended to use a method to automatically regenerate stale materialized views.

It is not possible to determine when the materialized views were last generated because their creation date is the date when imported into the database created at ARS. However, manual generation of just two of these views returns a different row count then what exists in the current materialized view. Data from some reports based on these views are also sometimes inconsistent when compared to other sources. It is therefore assumed that the materialized views are stale and need to be regenerated. Initial regeneration of the materialized views and evaluation of the best method for maintaining fresh views are included in the Action Plan.

3.3 Web Site Design In general the web site design is acceptable. It is relatively easy for a user to register and to

navigate the site once activated. It does not comply with section 508 requirements but according

7

to Pechan documentation an agreement was met with the WRAP to resolve this issue through additional text under the Terms and Agreements link. Users accessing the site with the Foxfire browser are not able to log in. Although specific use of Foxfire is not listed as a requirement, we are aware that many users prefer this browser and have therefore identified it as an issue to resolve if practicable. This, along with other specific web site issues, is noted in the issues tables in Section 4.

3.4 Application Code Design Virtually nothing good can be said about the application code design. First, a brand new

application developed in 2004 should have been built on a newer technology platform than ASP and Visual Basic 6; at the least, Microsoft’s .NET platform. No discernable design standards have been followed; the code is full of redundancy, there are thousands of lines of commented out code with no explanation and excessive database connects/disconnects/reconnects, and a lack of even common sense logic in many cases.

Assuming it is not economically feasible to rewrite the entire web site application, we

recommend the following steps to repair the application code: • Identify the components (ASP files, Javascript files, Visual basic modules, etc.) that

are actually being used then remove and archive all extraneous components.

• Delete commented out code segments unless some potential useful purpose can be identified for the segment.

• Go through the code to apply standard formatting (indents, uppercase vs. lowercase text, etc.) and internally document the purpose of each file, module, procedure, and function.

• Apply automated documentation tools to find unused/undefined variables, code segments, etc.

• Test each step on the test instance of the web site

• Eventually implement repaired code on the production web site

3.5 Process and Data Flows EDMS processes fall under two broad categories: data submittal and data reporting. The data submittal process is extremely convoluted and only semi-functional. The reporting processes generally work as designed, although there are some problems, and, again, the underlying program code is extremely convoluted and does not conform to standard programming conventions. A summary of the data submittal process and of how the data are delivered through the reporting processes is presented in the following sections. More detail on both types of processes is provided in Appendix A.

3.5.1 Data Submittal Data are submitted to the system by users classified as Data Owners and by system

administrators via a web interface. This interface simply allows the user to specify an inventory version and sector type (Area, Point, Non-road Mobile, Fire, or On-road Mobile) and then to upload and submit a zip file. It then alerts the system administrator via an email message that a

8

file has been uploaded for processing. The system administrator processes the file by running a Visual Basic program called EDMSUPLOAD. This program executes the processes listed in Table 3-2. Comments on the processes are also provided.

Table 3-2. The EDMS Upload Program

Step Process Comments 1 Unzips the upload file and verifies that it

contains the standard NIF tables for the source in Microsoft Access (MDB) format.

(Although the requirements state the EDMS is to accept NIF data in text, Microsoft Excel, and XML format the system is currently not capable of doing so. Also, the program does not see Fire as a valid type, even though the user can select it.).

2 Reads the data from the MDB file and inserts rows into the associated emission source Oracle tables in the EDMS_TXR schema.

This step is superfluous

3 Immediately copies the data to the same emission source tables in the EDMS_TXN schema.

Executes a series of Oracle stored procedures (program code stored in the database) which perform quality control checks on the submitted data.

Nearly 500 stored procedures exist. Many can be replaced by leveraging the power of the Oracle database engine and applying table-level constraints and utilizing dynamic SQL coding techniques.

4

The quality control checks are logged and bad data rows are flagged.

Bad data rows are flagged by inserting an error statement in a log bearing a unique log id. The offending data rows are updated with the log id. After all checks have been done, rows that break more than one rule are flagged only with the last error found. This is likely the reason rule-breaking rows are found in the production tables.

At this point, the EDMSUPLOAD program ends thereby breaking the process “thread”.

We can only assume from reviewing the high-level Pechan documentation and the remaining stored procedures that the steps listed in Table 3-3 were taken next.

Table 3-3. Assumed DBA Data Submittal Steps

Step Process Comments 1 The DBA reviews flagged rows and either

fixes the erroneous data or further flags the row by entering an “I” in the disposition_status field.

No VB or stored procedure code has been found that provides a comprehensive list of errors and offending rows for the DBA to review.

2 The DBA executes stored procedures that select the data rows where the submittal_flag = ‘A’ and disposition_status field is not equal “I” from the EDMS_TXN schema set of tables and inserts them into the EDMS_STG set of tables.

Example procedure name: EDMS_STG.PROC_ETL_TXNTOSTG_AREA

3 A series of stored procedures are executed that update the data in the EDMS_STG tables

See Figure A-7, page A-29 in the Appendix. Although these procedures exist, the log file does not contain the logging information they are supposed to generate.

9

Other items of note regarding the existing submittal processes include:

• The EDMS_STG schema also contains a set of stored procedures that process data where the submittal flag contains values other than ‘A’. However, since the ETL_TXNTOSTG procedures only copies data rows from the EDMS_TXN to EDMS_STG schema where the submittal flag is ‘A’ or null, it is not clear if these procedures were ever executed. Again, no logging information supposedly generated by these procedures exists.

• It is not clear how data were intended to be moved from the EDMS_STG schema to the EDMS_PRD schema. No stored procedures exist to accomplish the move.

• None of the data transfer procedures delete data from the tables of the previous stage.

• No useful report products have been found that provide listings of errors detected by the QA/QC procedures.

These procedures are also documented in flow chart Figure A-7 in Appendix A. Due to the convoluted nature and mistakes in logic of the data submittal processes, we recommend reviewing, revising, and thoroughly documenting the process.

3.5.2 Data Reporting Processes Data are reported to the user in a variety of on-screen displays and export file types as

described in Table 3-4. The reporting process is presented as a flow chart as Figure A-8 in Appendix A. All data reporting functions follow the same general process:

1. The user makes a selection through the web interface which is generated by Active

Server Pages (ASP) files. The user may choose to set the criteria for the report by simple metrics (ie. State, county, scc code etc) or spatially through the use of the mapping interface. The mapping section of the web interface utilizes the Adobe Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) Viewer which is embedded in the ASP page and accepts input from the user and displays data to the user.

2. Scripts embedded in the ASP call a program section in a compiled Visual Basic (VB) code library residing on the web server.

3. The VB program connects to the Oracle database, retrieves the data and either generates a file for export or returns the data to the ASP page for display.

4. The ASP page either presents a link for the user to download the file or displays the data on screen. For large export files, the export is scheduled to occur at a later time and the user is notified via email when the export is complete.

Most of the data reporting processes do not retrieve data directly from the emission

source tables in the production schema named EDMS_PRD. Instead, data are retrieved from pre-generated summary tables residing in the database or pre-generated, zipped, comma-delimited files residing on the web server. Only the NIF file export, available through the ad hoc query interface, generates export files based on direct queries to the EDMS_PRD emission source tables.

10

Table 3-4. On-Screen Displays and Export File Types

Report type On-screen display options

Download options

Standard reports GIS interface, graphs, tables

JPG or PDF images of charts, Excel or space-delimited text files

“Snapshot” files None Pre-generated zip files containing comma delimited text files

SMOKE Modeling files None Zip files containing space delimited text files with data based on the user’s query

Adhoc query files None Zip files containing both an MDB file and a space delimited text file with data based on the user’s query

4 EDMS Critical Functionality Analysis Comprehending how the EDMS was designed to function is essential in order to

accurately evaluate the effort required to fix issues. It is also essential to understand the data flows and process flows in order to implement fixes and enhancements without adversely affecting other functions within the system. Therefore, system testing was combined with system exploration and documentation to best evaluate EDMS issues. The following subsections discuss the steps taken and the methods used to perform the analysis.

4.1 Methods Virtually no system level documentation was provided. Therefore, the method used to

gain an operational understanding of the EDMS has been (and continues to be) a discovery process consisting of the following tasks:

• Tracing application code execution (we attempted to use a couple of commercial

software tools designed to automate application code documentation but the tools did not work well due to the lack of conventional standards within the Pechan code set)

• Inspecting log files

• Issuing database queries to determine database contents

• Reviewing the high-level documentation provided for clues to intended specific function

• Reviewing NEI documentation

• Generating process and data flow charts The test procedures used were designed primarily to identify critical problems within the

system. However, the tests and inspection of source code and database structures also measure the system's value to end-users by evaluating its usefulness and usability and the system’s

11

reliability, scalability (the capacity for a system to accommodate additional data and new types of data) and maintainability.

Testing results of EDMS functionality covers three areas:

1. Identification of issues with the existing web interface

2. Identification of issues with the existing data submittal process including QA/QC procedures

3. Identification of missing functionality based on the system requirements All functions have been tested to the extent possible within the time available. Some issues have been identified through program source code inspection rather than testing and have been discussed in the previous sections of this report. The report prepared by ERG titled “WRAP Emissions Data Management System (EDMS) Post-Beta Test Approach, Findings, and Recommendations” has also served as a resource to identify issues.

Each issue identified has been assigned a severity level based on expanded Bugzilla

definitions of how a bug affects an application: .

Severity Level Bugzilla definition / Expanded definition

Critical Crashes, loss of data, severe memory leak / Incorrectly reported data

Major Major loss of function / major loss of value to the user

Minor Minor loss of function, or other problem where an easy workaround is present / minor loss of value to the user

Trivial Cosmetic problem like misspelled words or misaligned text / or ugly images

4.2 Issues, Recommended Solutions, and Action Plan The section provides lists of the identified issues and recommended solutions and presents

a timeline for implementing the solutions. Three tables are provided. Table 4-1 lists the issues classified as Critical and Major because both greatly impact the overall value of the system. Critical and Major issues have been identified in all areas of functionality; data, data submittal, reporting, etc. The majority of these issues lie within the data itself and the data submittal process. A projected timeline for implementing a solution for each issue in this table is provided.

Table 4-2 presents a list of issues classified as minor and trivial. These also span the areas

of functionality. A projected timeline for implementing a solution has been provided for relatively easy to fix issues, others are listed “as feasible” and will be addressed as resources allow. The final table, Table 4-3, presents other actions, such as training, that are to take place during 2007.

12

Tabl

e 4-

1. C

ritic

al a

nd M

ajor

Issu

es

A

rea

Func

tion

Prob

lem

(s)

Seve

rity

L

evel

So

lutio

ns/ A

ltern

ate

solu

tion

Tim

elin

e

Dat

a

Mis

sing

and

revi

sed

stat

e an

d tri

be d

ata

sets

ar

e no

t inc

lude

d in

Inve

ntor

y 9

and

Inve

ntor

y 10

dat

a ar

e no

t in

the

prod

uctio

n ta

bles

; fire

dat

a is

not

cor

rect

ly in

clud

ed in

th

e da

taba

se.

Crit

ical

Lo

ad d

ata

into

the

prod

uctio

n da

taba

se.

Apr

il

Dat

abas

e

All

obje

cts

See

Sect

ion

3.1.

M

ajor

C

lean

up a

nd re

pair

(see

sect

ion

3.1)

. O

ngoi

ng

Initi

al Q

A p

roce

ss

TXN

_MA

STER

DIA

G

In te

stin

g, a

fata

l err

or is

retu

rned

. See

Se

ctio

n 3.

5.1.

C

ritic

al

Rev

iew

, rev

ise,

and

thor

ough

ly d

ocum

ent

QA

/QC

pro

cess

es. S

ee S

ectio

n 3.

5.1.

M

arch

Dat

a su

bmitt

al in

NIF

X

ML

form

at

Func

tiona

lity

is m

issi

ng. S

ome

sour

ce c

ode

was

pro

vide

d th

at in

dica

tes a

n in

tent

to

conv

ert X

ML

form

atte

d da

ta to

MD

B.

Crit

ical

D

evel

op a

pro

cedu

re to

read

the

XM

L da

ta

dire

ctly

into

the

Ora

cle

tabl

es.

Apr

il

Dat

a su

bmitt

al in

NIF

Ex

cel,

Text

form

at

Func

tiona

lity

is m

issi

ng.

Maj

or

Dro

p th

e re

quire

men

t if t

here

’s n

o ne

ed fo

r it.

Rec

eive

Act

ivity

Dat

a Fu

nctio

nalit

y is

mis

sing

. M

ajor

D

rop

the

requ

irem

ent.

Ther

e ar

e no

rela

ted

outp

ut re

quire

men

ts fo

r Act

ivity

dat

a.

Dat

a Su

bmitt

al

Subm

it da

ta in

vent

ory

sele

ctio

n U

sers

can

sele

ct a

ny in

vent

ory

vers

ion

to

subm

it da

ta to

. M

ajor

C

lear

ly d

efin

e in

vent

ory

vers

ions

and

w

hen

user

s are

allo

wed

to su

bmit

data

for

them

.

Mar

ch

App

licat

ion

Cod

e A

ll Se

e Se

ctio

n 3.

4.

Maj

or

Cle

anup

and

repa

ir (s

ee se

ctio

n 3.

4).

Ong

oing

Gen

eral

dat

a ou

tput

N

o ag

reem

ent b

etw

een

data

repo

rted

on

scre

en, d

ata

in E

xcel

exp

ort f

ile a

nd d

ata

“sna

psho

t file

”

Crit

ical

R

egen

erat

e su

mm

ary

tabl

es a

nd sn

apsh

ot

files

. Ver

ify su

mm

ary

tabl

es a

nd sn

apsh

ot

files

acc

urac

y. Im

plem

ent p

roce

ss to

en

sure

refr

esh

of su

mm

ary

tabl

es a

nd

snap

shot

file

s.

Mar

ch-

Apr

il

Gen

eral

repo

rting

inte

rfac

e D

rop

dow

n bo

x is

not

wid

e en

ough

to

com

plet

ely

disp

lay

long

trib

al n

ames

M

ajor

A

dd h

oriz

onta

l scr

oll b

ar so

the

full

nam

e ca

n be

vie

wed

. M

arch

Gen

eral

repo

rting

inte

rfac

e A

rapa

hoe

Trib

e of

the

Win

d R

iver

Trib

e lis

ted

twic

e in

stan

dard

repo

rt se

lect

ion

drop

dow

n m

enu.

Dat

a on

ly a

ssoc

iate

d w

ith o

ne n

ame.

Maj

or

C

ombi

ne n

ame

to re

ad “

Ara

paho

e an

d Sh

osho

ne T

ribes

of t

he W

ind

Riv

er

Res

erva

tion”

.

Mar

ch

Stan

dard

R

epor

ts

Poin

t Sou

rce

by N

ame

Rep

ort

Doe

s not

cor

rect

ly li

st fa

cilit

y na

mes

. In

so

me

case

s, so

urce

s fro

m d

iffer

ent s

tate

s ar

e in

clud

ed .

Crit

ical

D

ebug

and

fix.

M

arch

Gen

eral

usa

ge

Use

of t

ool i

s non

intu

itive

. Eve

n tra

ined

us

ers a

re li

kely

to fo

rget

how

to u

se it

ove

r tim

e.

Maj

or

Cre

ate

a ca

ptur

ed d

emo

sess

ion

and

prov

ide

an o

bvio

us li

nk to

it fo

r use

rs to

ge

t a q

uick

revi

ew o

n ho

w to

use

the

tool

.

Mar

ch

M

appi

ng T

ool

SVG

Vie

wer

N

o al

ert i

f the

SV

G V

iew

er is

not

inst

alle

d w

hen

the

user

atte

mpt

s to

use

the

tool

. M

ajor

Pr

ovid

e a

pop-

up b

ox a

lert

and

link

to th

e SV

G V

iew

er d

ownl

oad

page

. M

arch

13

Tabl

e 4-

2. M

inor

and

Triv

ial I

ssue

s

Are

a Fu

nctio

n Pr

oble

m(s

) Se

veri

ty

Lev

el

Solu

tions

/ Alte

rnat

e so

lutio

n T

imel

ine

Dat

a

Inve

ntor

y na

mes

are

not

suff

icie

ntly

de

scrip

tive.

M

inor

R

evis

e th

e na

mes

and

/or p

rovi

de re

adily

av

aila

ble

addi

tiona

l inv

ento

ry d

escr

iptio

ns

.

Mar

ch

Dat

a Su

bmitt

al

Men

u te

xt

Men

u op

tion

unde

r Dat

a M

anag

emen

t rea

ds

“File

/Dat

a Ex

port

Stat

us.”

Tr

ivia

l C

hang

e op

tion

to re

ad “

File

/Dat

a Im

port

Stat

us”

or F

ile/D

ata

Subm

ittal

Sta

tus.”

M

arch

Use

r que

ry se

lect

ion

Inve

ntor

y 5

- Tra

inin

g da

ta is

ava

ilabl

e to

se

lect

. M

inor

D

elet

e tra

inin

g da

ta fr

om th

e da

taba

se a

nd

rem

ove

refe

renc

e fr

om th

e w

eb in

terf

ace.

M

arch

Bro

wse

r ver

sion

s U

ser c

anno

t suc

cess

fully

logi

n if

usin

g th

e Fo

xfire

bro

wse

r. M

inor

A

ttem

pt to

deb

ug a

nd fi

x.

As

feas

ible

Ev

ents

and

Doc

umen

ts

page

s O

utda

ted

even

ts, d

isor

gani

zed

docu

men

ts.

Min

or

Rev

iew

for r

elev

ancy

, org

aniz

atio

n th

en

dele

te a

nd/o

r reo

rgan

ize.

A

s fe

asib

le

Gen

eral

web

in

terf

ace

Web

pag

e ba

nner

s “M

irror

ed”

imag

es n

ot a

esth

etic

ally

pl

easi

ng.

Triv

ial

Rep

lace

with

a v

arie

ty o

f im

ages

take

n at

W

RA

P C

lass

I ar

eas

As

feas

ible

C

LEA

R

Cle

ars g

eogr

aphi

cal s

elec

tion

but d

oes n

ot

clea

r res

ults

from

pre

viou

s sel

ectio

n.

Min

or

Cle

ar se

lect

ion

set,

rese

t sel

ect f

lag.

A

s fe

asib

le

Trib

al c

ount

y ov

erla

p fla

g Tr

ibal

and

cou

nty

data

is in

dat

abas

e bu

t w

hen

the

user

“m

ouse

’s o

ver”

the

coun

ty

the

text

doe

s not

refle

ct th

e st

ate

of th

e da

ta.

Min

or

Ensu

re fl

ags a

re se

t for

all

Trib

al v

s C

ount

y da

ta in

the

prod

uctio

n da

taba

se.

As

feas

ible

Fetc

h Fa

cilit

y D

ata

Not

cle

ar w

hat t

his c

heck

box

doe

s, ne

ed

clar

ity fo

r the

use

rs.

Min

or

Whe

n th

e ch

eckb

ox is

sele

cted

the

mes

sage

box

shou

ld p

op u

p to

tell

the

user

th

at th

is w

ill sl

ow th

e qu

ery

dow

n, n

ot

afte

r the

use

r has

initi

ated

the

quer

y.

As

feas

ible

Map

ping

Too

l

Prog

ress

bar

s D

ispl

ay o

f thr

ee p

rogr

ess b

ars w

ith n

o in

dica

tion

of p

urpo

se.

Min

or

Rem

ove

or d

eter

min

e pu

rpos

e an

d la

bel.

As

feas

ible

St

anda

rd

Rep

orts

Fi

re R

epor

ts

No

data

for r

epor

ts in

dat

abas

e.

Min

or

Dis

able

repo

rts u

ntil

the

data

is p

rese

nt.

Mar

ch

Expo

rt to

Exc

el

Dat

a sa

ved

as E

xcel

ver

sion

2.0

whi

ch m

ust

be o

pene

d in

rece

nt v

ersi

ons o

f Exc

el a

nd

re-s

aved

bef

ore

impo

rting

dat

a fr

om E

xcel

in

to A

cces

s.

Min

or

Upd

ate

func

tion

if po

ssib

le to

save

dat

a as

a

late

r ver

sion

of E

xcel

. A

s fe

asib

le

Dat

a Ex

port

Are

a So

urce

by

SCC

Sn

apsh

ot fi

le

Inva

lid c

omm

a de

limite

d fo

rmat

resu

lting

in

the

dat

a fo

r the

Inve

ntor

y Y

ear b

eing

lis

ted

in th

e V

OC

pol

luta

nt c

olum

n.

Min

or

Deb

ug a

nd fi

x.

As

feas

ible

Dat

a re

triev

al p

rogr

ess

Win

dow

sim

ply

disp

lays

“Lo

adin

g D

ata”

w

ith n

o in

dica

tion

of p

rogr

ess o

r tha

t the

sy

stem

is w

orki

ng.

Min

or

Add

pro

gres

s bar

or s

ome

othe

r ani

mat

ed

indi

cato

r.

As

feas

ible

A

dhoc

Que

ry

SCC

cod

es li

stin

g Th

e SC

C-4

list

is n

ot n

umer

ical

ord

ered

. M

inor

O

rder

the

list.

As

feas

ible

14

Table 4-3. Other Action Items

Item Timeline Emissions Forum comments on draft Critical Functionality Report requested within 2 weeks

Monday, March 12

Final Critical Functionality Report Friday, March 16 Participate with tribes to implement inventory changes base on review of tribal/state emissions overlap

To begin in April, others scheduled as needed

New Data uploads -2005 data, more versions of 2018 data -will require QA/QC, and potentially gap filling

To begin with one state in April, others to occur as ready

Webinar training, basic intro to site; caveats: -all data may not yet be in the database -some features may still be under construction

First one in April, others scheduled as needed

Live training: -many issues expected to be resolved

June

5 Recommended Future Enhancements Since taking over the EDMS hosting responsibilities over the last 3 months, ARS’ vision

of the path that EDMS needs to take has not changed from the one presented in our proposal. The most important future enhancement is to link the EDMS to the TSS to provide data review and analysis tools that would be too expensive to implement in the EDMS. 5.1 Link the EDMS to the TSS The EDMS should be a relatively simple warehouse of emissions data accessible to WRAP states and tribes. There is a need for users to be able to access these data for a variety of applications, but it is important that the EDMS functionality be carefully focused to critical tasks. The WRAP is currently developing its Technical Support System (TSS) which will soon be capable of storing, analyzing, and presenting emissions data (geographically, graphically, and in tabular format). Tools already developed and supported by WRAP should be leveraged to enhance or compliment the EDMS; a cost-effective and relatively straight forward alternative to re-developing the same tools in the EDMS environment. With the appropriate linkage, the EDMS would continue to be a repository and clearinghouse for quality assured emissions data, and the TSS would lend its functionality and variety of GIS and analytical tools to the EDMS database. The main task in this enhancement is to transform the existing set of EDMS database tables into a true data warehouse. This will be accomplished by removing most of the external programming from the QA/QC process and taking advantage of functionality that is built into the Oracle database.

The EDMS mapping component should be transformed to true GIS functionality. We recommend moving to the ESRI suite of tools and data storage structures. In moving from the

15

static SVG platform to the more robust ESRI platform, EDMS users will be able to view and query base and inventory data in a much more stable, widely accepted and supported environment. This will simplify the printing and data downloads from the EDMS as well as using a more standard GIS interface. ARS could undertake this task and spend 3 to 6 months of development time in setting up the Spatial Database Engine, the Internet Mapping server and writing code to integrate ESRI products into the application, but we do not believe that this approach would best serve WRAP’s needs. Instead, we recommend leveraging existing licenses and development that is currently being performed for the TSS at CIRA. In recent discussions with CIRA we have been informed they are on the path to moving their internal mapping components to the ESRI suite of products, potentially with other third party GIS tools, but an expected completion date is not yet known.

The EDMS data structure would be visible to the TSS mapping and query tool by either transferring a published, fully QA’d database to the TSS server or providing a read-only access to the EDMS database hosted at ARS. The advantages of transferring a published database up to the TSS are redundancy and integrity. Data would be available to users even if the ARS main database is down for scheduled maintenance. Data would also be available to be analyzed in conjunction with other relevant data sets providing another data integrity check. We have met with CIRA to discuss the coupling strategy and have decided on an initial data transfer protocol to be used.

A schedule for further work on linkage between the EDMS and the TSS will be

dependent on the time required to implement the recommendations in this report and on CIRA’s work on the TSS GIS components. Updates on EDMS-TSS linkage will be provided in future contract status reports.

5.2 Host the EDMS at CIRA

Given expected future funding constraints facing the WRAP, it may make fiscal sense for the EDMS to eventually be hosted at CIRA to consolidate the WRAP’s hosting costs. At this time, the best way to facilitate hosting the EDMS at CIRA would be to migrate the database from the Oracle RDBMS to the Microsoft SQLServer RDBMS. Reasons to do so include:

• Oracle products are not currently covered under CIRA’s suite of educational software

licenses.

• CIRA is experienced in and proficient at hosting systems on the Microsoft platform.

• Implementing GIS services for the EDMS will be less complicated. However, it is too early to recommend a specific course of action on this topic. This move would require direction from the WRAP at a future date.

16

Appendix A

A-1

Tabl

e A

-1. E

DM

S Tr

ansi

tion

Req

uire

men

ts

Ite

m

Req

uire

men

ts

Proj

ecte

d D

ate

of

Com

plet

ion

Not

es

AR

S N

otes

Pro

duct

ion

Ora

cle

Dat

abas

e O

racl

e E

xpor

t ver

sion

9.

1 or

hig

her

Fu

ll D

atab

ase

Exp

ort

FULL

=Y (a

ll ob

ject

s in

clud

ing

trigg

ers,

etc

.) 11

/17/

2006

O

n P

echa

n FT

P -

Com

plet

e

Li

mit

dum

p fil

e si

ze

FILE

SIZ

E=2

GB

In a

bove

exp

ort-

Com

plet

e

Impo

rt in

to 3

2-bi

t OS

R

EC

OR

DLE

NG

TH=

In

abo

ve e

xpor

t- C

ompl

ete

D

o no

t com

pres

s

In a

bove

exp

ort-

Com

plet

e

Dum

p fil

es o

n D

VD

Tw

o co

pies

In a

bove

exp

ort-

Com

plet

e

Yes

.

O

racl

e E

xpor

t Com

man

d

Text

file

11

/17/

2006

O

n P

echa

n FT

P- C

ompl

ete

Yes

.

Ora

cle

Exp

ort L

og fi

le

Text

file

11

/17/

2006

O

n P

echa

n FT

P- C

ompl

ete

Yes

.

Ora

cle

conf

igur

atio

n fil

es

CO

NFI

G.O

RA

, IN

IT.O

RA

, TN

SN

AM

ES

.OR

A,

LIS

TEN

ER

.OR

A, e

tc.

12/1

1/20

06

On

Pec

han

FTP-

Com

plet

e (1

2/19

/200

6)

Yes

.

Test

Ora

cle

Dat

abas

e S

ame

as p

rodu

ctio

n (re

quire

d on

ly if

it

cont

ains

dat

a or

ap

plic

atio

n co

mpo

nent

s no

t con

tain

ed in

the

prod

uctio

n D

B.)

12/1

5/20

06

On

Pec

han

FTP-

Com

plet

e Th

e fil

e w

as p

rovi

ded.

How

ever

, the

con

tent

s ar

e id

entic

al to

the

tabl

es in

the

prod

uctio

n da

taba

se.

ED

MS

-rela

ted

data

not

in O

racl

e

Sou

rce

data

file

s S

tand

ard

file

form

ats;

A

SC

II, E

xcel

, Acc

ess

12/3

1/20

06

On

Pec

han

FTP-

Com

plet

e

A lo

t of f

iles

post

ed. A

RS

has

cop

ied

to a

net

wor

k dr

ive

and

crea

ted

two

DVD

cop

ies.

Doc

umen

tatio

n (P

roje

ct w

eb s

ite

cont

ents

– A

LL D

OC

UM

EN

TS)

Sou

rce

data

info

rmat

ion,

st

atus

, etc

. 12

/31/

2006

O

n P

echa

n FT

P- C

ompl

ete

Yes

, doc

s fro

m th

e do

cum

ents

list

on

the

ED

MS

web

si

te (a

long

with

man

y un

rela

ted

docs

). E

mis

sion

Inve

ntor

ies

Doc

umen

tatio

n V

ersi

on d

efin

ition

s, d

ata

sour

ces,

QA

pro

cess

es

appl

ied,

etc

.

11/1

7/20

06

On

curre

nt

http

://w

ww

.wra

pedm

s.or

g si

te

The

inve

ntor

y de

scrip

tion

docu

men

ts d

o no

t alw

ays

clea

rly s

tate

dat

a su

bmitt

al s

tatu

s in

the

data

base

. M

ost t

ribal

sub

mis

sion

s in

dica

te “u

nder

ana

lysi

s”. W

hat

addi

tiona

l doc

umen

tatio

n is

ava

ilabl

e re

gard

ing

anal

ysis

? W

hat i

s th

e st

atus

of I

nven

tory

10?

The

Inve

ntor

y 10

de

scrip

tion

docu

men

t doe

s no

t ind

icat

e da

taba

se

stat

us. T

he E

DM

S_P

RD

tabl

es d

eliv

ered

by

Pec

han

do n

ot in

clud

e an

y re

cord

s w

here

the

Inve

ntor

y_Id

fiel

d co

ntai

ns 1

0. S

ome

of th

e st

agin

g ta

bles

do

(ED

MS

_TXN

, ED

MS

_TXR

, ED

MS

_STG

). Th

e vb

Rep

orts

cla

ss p

oste

d by

Pec

han

on 1

2/9

uses

a

hard

cod

ed O

DB

C c

onne

ctio

n to

“edm

s_pr

d” w

hen

the

quer

y cr

iteria

refe

r to

Inve

ntor

y 10

. Thi

s in

dica

tes

that

pe

rhap

s da

ta fo

r Inv

ento

ry 1

0 w

ere

bein

g re

triev

ed

from

a d

iffer

ent d

atab

ase

inst

ance

on

the

Pec

han

site

w

hen

com

paris

on te

stin

g oc

curre

d..

A-2

Item

R

equi

rem

ents

Pr

ojec

ted

Dat

e of

C

ompl

etio

n

Not

es

AR

S N

otes

App

licat

ion

Sou

rce

code

A

ll as

p, h

tml,

js, a

sp,

imag

e, a

nd V

B fi

les.

Any

ot

her s

crip

ts u

sed

by th

e ap

plic

atio

n

12/6

/200

6 O

n Pe

chan

FTP

- C

ompl

ete

Add

ition

al c

ode

post

ed 1

2/29

. A

RS

is u

nabl

e to

ver

ify

if w

e ha

ve th

e la

test

app

licat

ion

code

or n

ot.

Appl

icat

ion

docu

men

tatio

n S

ourc

e co

de c

onte

nts

docu

men

tatio

n (fi

le

defin

ition

s an

d de

pend

enci

es, e

tc.),

E-R

di

agra

ms,

pro

cess

flow

ch

arts

, dat

a flo

w c

harts

, et

c.

11/1

7/20

06

At

http

://pr

ojec

ts.p

echa

n.co

m/e

dms

unde

r “D

evel

opm

ent P

lan”

- C

ompl

ete

Hig

h le

vel o

nly,

no

deta

ils o

n ob

ject

dep

ende

ncie

s,

proc

esse

s, ta

ble

rela

tions

hips

, sto

red

proc

edur

es, e

tc.

Det

aile

d in

form

atio

n re

gard

ing

the

XM

LtoM

DB

obj

ect

and

proc

essi

ng o

f dat

a su

bmis

sion

s is

esp

ecia

lly

impo

rtant

.

Use

r doc

umen

tatio

n D

ocum

ents

in P

DF

or

Wor

d fo

rmat

11

/17/

2006

O

n cu

rrent

ht

tp://

ww

w.w

rape

dms.

org

site

- C

ompl

ete

Yes

.

IIS C

onfig

urat

ion

IIS c

onfig

urat

ion

files

12

/13/

2006

O

n P

echa

n FT

P- C

ompl

ete

Not

foun

d bu

t no

long

er n

eede

d.

Dom

ain

nam

e

AR

S a

utho

rized

to

acce

ss re

gist

rar

12/1

5/20

06

On

Pec

han

FTP-

Com

plet

e Y

es.

Pro

ject

web

site

con

tent

s D

ocum

ents

in P

DF

or

Wor

d fo

rmat

12

/31/

2006

O

n P

echa

n FT

P- C

ompl

ete

Not

foun

d bu

t AR

S h

as m

anua

lly d

ownl

oade

d al

l doc

s fro

m th

e si

te.

WR

AP

ow

ned

softw

are

Li

cens

es a

nd in

stal

latio

n m

edia

to a

ll E

DM

S

deve

lopm

ent t

ools

or

othe

r sof

twar

e ow

ned

by

WR

AP

N/A

Th

ere

is n

one.

D

eliv

ered

AS

P m

ail,

Cha

rts,

Upl

oad

- com

plet

e

Yes

.

Appl

icat

ion

upda

tes

Log

of a

ll da

ta a

nd/o

r ap

plic

atio

n m

odifi

catio

ns

mad

e si

nce

10/1

/200

6.

12/6

/200

6 12

/31/

2006

App

licat

ion

- to

be s

ent w

ith

late

st s

ourc

e co

de. –

no

log

is

kept

. D

ata

– to

be

incl

uded

in th

e cl

osin

g do

cum

enta

tion

for t

he

proj

ect.

Bug

zilla

reco

rds

EM

DS

-rela

ted

Bug

zilla

re

cord

s in

CS

V fo

rmat

UN

C c

anno

t ret

rieve

dat

a A

RS

has

scr

een

capt

ured

reco

rds.

Dat

a so

urce

s R

aw d

ata

sour

ces

arch

ive

12/3

1/20

06

Tran

sfer

red

on F

TP s

erve

r -

Com

plet

e Y

es.

SV

G F

iles

11

/30/

2006

O

n P

echa

n FT

P - C

ompl

ete

Yes

. S

ourc

e co

de fo

r the

“S

ched

ule_

Adho

c_M

odel

ling_

PRD

.exe

12/1

9/20

06

On

Pec

han

FTP

- Com

plet

e Y

es.

A-3

Tabl

e A

-2. E

DM

S R

equi

rem

ents

Cat

egor

y/

Subc

ateg

ory

Req

uire

men

t R

emar

ks

Sour

ce *

Dat

abas

e

Pro

vide

com

preh

ensi

ve e

mis

sion

s tra

ckin

g an

d re

porti

ng c

apab

ilitie

s re

leva

nt to

Sta

te/T

ribal

Impl

emen

tatio

n P

lans

(SIP

s/TI

Ps)

for c

lean

air

corr

idor

s (C

AC

), an

d st

atio

nary

SO

2 so

urce

s, a

s w

ell a

s m

obile

and

fire

so

urce

s.

Mee

ts m

ost r

equi

rem

ents

; fire

em

issi

ons

curr

ently

not

ava

ilabl

e on

the

ED

MS

. 2

Sup

port

the

SO

2 em

issi

ons

from

elig

ible

sta

tiona

ry s

ourc

es w

ithin

sta

tes

or tr

ibal

rese

rvat

ions

par

ticip

atin

g in

S

ectio

n 30

9 tra

ckin

g pu

rsua

nt to

the

SO

2 A

nnex

pro

gram

. M

eets

requ

irem

ent

2

Con

form

to th

e R

PO

Dat

a E

xcha

nge

Pro

toco

l S

truct

ure

mig

ht c

onfo

rm b

ut th

ere

is n

o fu

nctio

n to

exp

ort d

ata

in R

PO

form

at

2

Stru

ctur

e m

ust f

acili

tate

the

abili

ty to

read

ily id

entif

y, s

ort a

nd e

xtra

ct in

form

atio

n by

var

ious

cat

egor

ies,

in

aggr

egat

e an

d/or

com

bina

tion

incl

udin

g, b

ut n

ot li

mite

d to

the

follo

win

g: p

oint

, are

a, ro

ad, n

on-r

oad,

etc

. S

tatic

sum

mar

y ta

bles

are

pre

-gen

erat

ed to

pr

ovid

e da

ta to

repo

rts

2

Rep

ort a

ll vi

sibi

lity-

impa

iring

pol

luta

nt e

mis

sion

s M

eets

requ

irem

ent

Incl

ude

all s

ourc

es a

nd th

eir a

ctiv

ity d

ata

(at l

east

) on

an a

nnua

l lev

el a

nd a

cou

nty

leve

l A

lthou

gh A

ctiv

ity d

ata

stru

ctur

es a

re p

rese

nt,

no d

ata

exis

t and

no

data

sub

mitt

al p

roce

ss

for a

ctiv

ity d

ata

exis

ts

Gen

eral

E

mis

sion

s S

tora

ge

Acc

ept a

nd re

port

data

in th

e N

EI f

orm

at

Mee

ts re

quire

men

t

3

Cat

alog

, man

age,

and

repo

rt da

ta o

n sp

ecifi

c fa

cilit

ies.

M

eets

requ

irem

ent

Sto

re p

oint

so

urce

dat

a A

ccom

mod

ate

the

vary

ing

repo

rting

thre

shol

ds a

s de

fined

by

the

agen

cy p

rovi

ding

the

data

M

eets

requ

irem

ent

Man

age

and

repo

rt da

ta o

n th

e ag

greg

atio

n of

faci

litie

s an

d ac

tiviti

es th

at d

o no

t mee

t the

sta

tiona

ry p

oint

so

urce

thre

shol

d va

lues

, exc

ludi

ng fi

re a

nd w

indb

low

n du

st s

ourc

es a

nd in

clud

ing

open

bur

ning

act

iviti

es.

Mee

ts re

quire

men

t

Abi

lity

to m

anag

e in

form

atio

n on

indu

stria

l, co

mm

erci

al, a

nd/o

r res

iden

tial s

ourc

es. O

rgan

ize

area

sou

rce

emis

sion

s by

cou

nty

and

SC

C o

n an

ann

ual t

empo

ral r

esol

utio

n ba

sis.

M

eets

requ

irem

ent

Acc

omm

odat

e va

riatio

ns in

S/L

/T s

ourc

e de

finiti

ons.

M

eets

requ

irem

ent

Sto

re a

rea

sour

ce d

ata

Pro

vide

a m

echa

nism

to h

ouse

the

info

rmat

ion

abou

t the

leve

l of a

ctiv

ity a

ssoc

iate

d w

ith a

par

ticul

ar a

rea

sour

ce, t

he e

mis

sion

fact

or a

nd th

e em

issi

ons.

A

lthou

gh A

ctiv

ity d

ata

stru

ctur

es a

re p

rese

nt,

no d

ata

exis

t and

no

data

sub

mitt

al p

roce

ss

for a

ctiv

ity d

ata

exis

ts

Cat

alog

, man

age,

and

repo

rt em

issi

ons

data

from

on-

road

sou

rces

. M

eets

requ

irem

ent

Sto

re e

mis

sion

fact

ors

deve

lope

d ex

tern

al to

the

syst

em u

sing

the

EP

A’s

MO

BIL

E m

odel

or C

AR

B’s

EM

FAC

m

odel

. Em

issi

on fa

ctor

s in

clud

e bo

th e

xhau

st a

nd n

on-e

xhau

st e

mis

sion

s.

Not

sur

e if

requ

irem

ent m

et a

t thi

s tim

e

Sto

re a

pplic

able

veh

icle

mile

s tra

vele

d (V

MT)

dat

a an

d pr

ovid

e us

ers

with

the

abili

ty to

upd

ate

data

ove

r tim

e by

mod

ifyin

g V

MT

data

as

avai

labl

e an

d em

issi

on fa

ctor

s as

nee

ded.

A

lthou

gh d

ata

stru

ctur

es d

esig

ned

to h

old

VM

T ar

e pr

esen

t, no

dat

a ex

ist a

nd n

o da

ta

subm

ittal

pro

cess

for V

MT

data

exi

sts

Sto

re d

ust e

mis

sion

s ca

lcul

ated

usi

ng A

P-4

2 or

EP

A’s

PA

RT5

mod

el.

Mee

ts re

quire

men

t A

bilit

y to

org

aniz

e by

cou

nty

and

SC

C.

Mee

ts re

quire

men

t

Acc

omm

odat

e co

unty

-leve

l em

issi

ons

estim

ates

pre

pare

d us

ing

the

NO

NR

OA

D 2

002

mod

el, a

nd h

ave

the

abili

ty to

man

age

seas

onal

or a

nnua

l tem

pora

l allo

catio

ns.

Mee

ts re

quire

men

t

Sto

re

mob

ile

sour

ce d

ata

Pro

vide

the

data

ele

men

ts s

uffic

ient

for S

ectio

n 30

9 tra

ckin

g, a

nd to

faci

litat

e sp

ecia

l rep

ortin

g ca

pabi

lity

defin

ed in

the

Nee

ds A

sses

smen

t doc

umen

t. M

eets

requ

irem

ent

Sto

re d

ata

gene

rate

d by

EP

A’s

BE

IS m

odel

, spe

cific

ally

the

annu

al e

mis

sion

s.

Mee

ts re

quire

men

t S

tore

bi

ogen

ic

sour

ce d

ata

Sto

re a

nd m

anag

e co

unty

-leve

l win

dblo

wn

dust

dat

a re

view

ed a

nd a

ppro

ved

by th

e S

/L/T

age

ncie

s pr

ior t

o in

clus

ion.

Sup

port

stor

age

of a

nnua

l em

issi

ons

data

and

acc

omm

odat

e fin

er te

mpo

ral r

esol

utio

ns. C

onve

rt da

ta

from

grid

to c

ount

y le

vel d

ata

for S

/L/T

revi

ew.

Mee

ts s

ome

requ

irem

ents

; onl

y an

nual

re

solu

tion

avai

labl

e

Est

imat

e fir

e em

issi

ons

from

wild

fires

, pre

scrib

ed fi

re, w

ildla

nd b

urni

ng a

nd a

gric

ultu

ral b

urni

ng a

ctiv

ities

.

Fire

E

mis

sion

s S

uppo

rt th

e W

RA

P F

ire T

rack

ing

Sys

tem

s m

etho

dolo

gy, w

hich

def

ines

ess

entia

l and

opt

iona

l dat

a el

emen

ts

purs

uant

to c

alcu

latin

g th

e em

issi

ons

of fi

re, a

s w

ell a

s a

met

hod

to c

alcu

late

them

. Inc

lude

fiel

ds to

trac

k th

e ca

lcul

atio

n m

etho

d fo

r an

emis

sion

s re

cord

.

Cur

rent

ly fi

re d

ata

are

not s

tore

d in

the

ED

MS

due

to p

ast p

erfo

rman

ce is

sues

2

A-4

Cat

egor

y/

Subc

ateg

ory

Req

uire

men

t R

emar

ks

Sour

ce *

Incl

ude

estim

ates

of b

oth

plan

ning

ann

ual e

mis

sion

s an

d ac

tual

dai

ly e

mis

sion

s to

sup

port

mod

elin

g an

d re

gula

tory

nee

ds.

D

atab

ase

Aud

iting

A

utom

ated

aud

it co

ntro

l and

dat

a ve

rsio

n tra

ckin

g de

sign

ed in

to th

e st

orag

e da

taba

se. A

ssur

e ch

ange

s to

the

data

base

or d

ata

are

thor

ough

ly d

ocum

ente

d an

d re

tain

ed, p

rovi

ding

the

abili

ty to

rest

ore

prio

r dat

a if

nece

ssar

y.

Alth

ough

the

data

stru

ctur

e ex

ists

to s

tore

au

dit d

ata,

no

data

exi

st a

nd n

o fu

nctio

ns

have

bee

n id

entif

ied

that

gen

erat

e au

dit d

ata

Dat

a S

ubm

ittal

A

ccep

t inv

ento

ry d

ata

that

is N

IF 3

.0 c

ompl

iant

in M

S A

cces

s, A

SC

II an

d X

ML

form

at.

Acc

epts

MS

Acc

ess

form

at o

nly

Per

form

dat

a an

alys

is q

ualit

y as

sura

nce/

valid

atio

n an

d sc

rub

(adj

ust)

data

; aug

men

t dat

a.

Aut

omat

ed p

roce

sses

are

sus

pect

, DB

A

initi

ated

pro

cess

es a

re u

ndoc

umen

ted.

A

ccep

t Act

ivity

Det

ail d

ata

in M

S A

cces

s or

AS

CII

fixed

-wid

th fo

rmat

. D

oes

not m

eet r

equi

rem

ent.

Allo

w u

sers

to s

ubm

it Fi

re d

ata

as a

sep

arat

e so

urce

type

, alth

ough

it is

sto

red

as a

sub

set o

f the

poi

nt s

ourc

e da

ta.

Doe

s no

t mee

t req

uire

men

t.

Upl

oad

Val

idat

e th

e st

ruct

ure

of th

e su

bmitt

al. I

f the

stru

ctur

e is

inva

lid, s

end

a m

essa

ge to

the

data

pro

vide

r with

in 2

4 ho

urs

to in

dica

te th

at th

e da

ta s

ubm

ittal

cou

ld n

ot b

e re

ad a

nd n

ote

failu

re in

the

data

base

. S

truct

ure

is v

alid

ated

, no

auto

mat

ed p

roce

ss

is in

pla

ce to

not

ify th

e da

ta p

rovi

der

Impo

rt in

to a

hol

ding

are

a fo

r qua

lity

revi

ew.

Mee

ts re

quire

men

t Th

e qu

ality

revi

ew in

clud

es (b

ut is

not

nec

essa

rily

limite

d to

) che

ckin

g fo

r key

fiel

ds, r

efer

entia

l int

egrit

y,

dupl

icat

e re

cord

s, a

nd m

issi

ng e

mis

sion

info

rmat

ion

(nul

l em

issi

on n

umer

ic v

alue

s or

em

issi

on u

nit

num

erat

ors)

, con

firm

ing

valid

cod

e va

lues

(for

exa

mpl

e, S

IC, S

CC

, uni

ts o

f mea

sure

, etc

.), v

alid

val

ues

and

rang

es in

par

ticul

ar fi

elds

(for

exa

mpl

e, s

tack

hei

ght c

heck

s, e

xit v

eloc

ity c

heck

s, la

titud

e an

d lo

ngitu

de c

heck

s ag

ains

t cou

nty

boun

darie

s, a

ppro

pria

te P

M10

to P

M2.

5 rela

tions

hips

), an

d se

ason

al th

roug

hput

per

cent

ages

.

Par

tially

mee

ts re

quire

men

ts b

ut m

etho

ds

are

susp

ect

Ret

urn

a re

port

to th

e da

ta p

rovi

der w

ithin

24

hour

s of

the

QA

revi

ew li

stin

g th

e er

rors

and

thei

r sev

erity

leve

l fo

und

in th

e su

bmitt

al. A

sev

erity

leve

l of “

Crit

ical

” mea

ns th

at th

e da

ta h

as n

ot b

een

acce

pted

. Cur

rent

ly, a

ll er

rors

are

pro

cess

ed a

s “C

ritic

al.”

Doe

s no

t mee

t req

uire

men

t; no

pro

cess

for

gene

ratin

g a

usef

ul re

port

and

for n

otify

ing

the

prov

ider

of p

robl

ems

have

bee

n di

scov

ered

Lo

g su

bmitt

al s

teps

thro

ugho

ut th

e pr

oces

s.

Log

data

has

bee

n ge

nera

ted

but o

nly

the

TXN

sta

ge is

refe

renc

ed. T

he p

roce

ss o

f m

ovin

g da

ta b

eyon

d th

is s

tage

has

not

bee

n lo

gged

in th

e da

taba

se.

QA

/QC

Insu

re th

at a

dat

a pr

ovid

er h

as n

ot re

porte

d da

ta fo

r a d

iffer

ent j

uris

dict

ion

and

the

orig

in o

f all

data

is c

lear

ly

disc

erna

ble

in th

e ex

iting

ED

MS

des

ign

and

prac

tice

and

revi

ew th

e su

bmitt

ed d

ata

for c

ompl

eten

ess,

acc

urac

y an

d re

ason

able

ness

.

Doe

s no

t mee

t req

uire

men

t; no

aut

omat

ed o

r m

anua

l pro

cess

es h

ave

been

dis

cove

red.

1

Use

r/Adm

in

Pro

vide

a m

odul

e th

at a

llow

s E

DM

S a

dmin

istra

tors

to m

anag

e us

ers,

pas

swor

ds a

nd a

ssig

n sy

stem

acc

ess

right

s us

ing

the

on-li

ne, w

eb-b

ased

inte

rface

. M

eets

requ

irem

ent

Pro

vide

a u

ser r

egis

tratio

n fu

nctio

n, a

nd a

LIS

TSE

RV

func

tion

so u

sers

can

be

notif

ied

of E

DM

S u

pdat

es a

nd

othe

r per

tinen

t inf

orm

atio

n co

ncer

ning

the

ED

MS

. P

artia

lly m

eets

; no

LIS

TSE

RV

func

tion

exis

ts

to o

ur k

now

ledg

e

Pro

duce

and

del

iver

an

on-li

ne U

ser’s

Man

ual d

ocum

entin

g th

e us

e an

d fu

nctio

n of

the

ED

MS

. The

Use

r’s

Man

ual s

hall

desc

ribe

how

to th

e us

e ea

ch m

odul

e of

the

syst

em, a

nd s

hall

prov

ide

a re

fere

nce

to u

sers

on

the

gene

ral u

se o

f the

sys

tem

as

wel

l as

spec

ific

info

rmat

ion

such

as

a gl

ossa

ry o

f nom

encl

atur

e, h

ow to

obt

ain

supp

ort,

and

frequ

ently

ask

ed q

uest

ions

and

thei

r ans

wer

s.

Mee

ts re

quire

men

t

1

Th

e w

eb in

terfa

ce s

hall

adhe

re to

Sec

tion

508

of th

e A

mer

ican

s w

ith D

isab

ilitie

s A

ct re

quiri

ng a

ll co

mpu

ter W

eb

site

s an

d on

-line

app

licat

ions

to m

eet t

he s

peci

ficat

ions

set

forth

in 3

6 C

ode

of F

eder

al R

egul

atio

ns (C

FR) P

art

7 11

94, E

lect

roni

c an

d In

form

atio

n Te

chno

logy

Acc

essi

bilit

y S

tand

ards

.

This

requ

irem

ent i

s re

fere

nced

as

bein

g re

solv

ed b

y ad

ding

text

to th

e Te

rms

&

Con

ditio

ns p

age

of th

e E

DM

S.

2/1

Rep

orts

A

sum

mar

y re

port

of th

e an

nual

WR

AP

em

issi

on in

vent

ory,

com

pile

d at

the

coun

ty a

nd re

serv

atio

n le

vels

and

to

tale

d fo

r eac

h st

ate,

trib

e, a

nd th

e W

RA

P re

gion

, for

all

pollu

tant

s, b

roke

n do

wn

by p

oint

, are

a, m

obile

, fire

, bi

ogen

ic, a

nd w

ind-

blow

n du

st s

ourc

e ca

tego

ries,

and

by

sum

med

tota

l em

issi

ons

for a

ll si

x so

urce

cat

egor

ies.

A

sum

mar

y re

port

of th

e an

nual

WR

AP

em

issi

ons

from

the

stat

iona

ry p

oint

sou

rces

in e

ach

coun

ty a

nd

rese

rvat

ion

and

the

stat

iona

ry p

oint

sou

rces

for e

ach

stat

e, tr

ibe

and

the

entir

e re

gion

(bro

ken

dow

n by

pla

nt

nam

e), f

or e

ach

pollu

tant

.

S

tand

ard

Rep

orts

A s

umm

ary

repo

rt of

the

annu

al W

RA

P e

mis

sion

s fro

m th

e st

atio

nary

poi

nt s

ourc

es in

eac

h co

unty

and

All

repo

rting

func

tions

mee

t min

imum

re

quire

men

ts. U

ses

stat

ic ta

bles

to re

port

from

inst

ead

of li

ve d

ata

sour

ce.

3

A-5

Cat

egor

y/

Subc

ateg

ory

Req

uire

men

t R

emar

ks

Sour

ce *

rese

rvat

ion

and

the

stat

iona

ry p

oint

sou

rces

for e

ach

stat

e, tr

ibe

and

the

entir

e re

gion

(bro

ken

dow

n by

SC

C

code

), fo

r eac

h po

lluta

nt.

A s

umm

ary

repo

rt of

the

annu

al W

RA

P e

mis

sion

s fro

m th

e ar

ea s

ourc

es in

eac

h co

unty

and

rese

rvat

ion

and

the

area

sou

rces

for e

ach

stat

e, tr

ibe

and

the

entir

e re

gion

(bro

ken

dow

n by

SC

C c

ode)

, for

eac

h po

lluta

nt.

A s

umm

ary

repo

rt of

the

annu

al W

RA

P e

mis

sion

s fro

m th

e “T

op 1

0” s

tatio

nary

poi

nt s

ourc

es in

eac

h co

unty

an

d re

serv

atio

n an

d th

e “T

op 1

0” s

tatio

nary

poi

nt s

ourc

es fo

r eac

h st

ate,

trib

e an

d th

e en

tire

regi

on (b

roke

n do

wn

by S

CC

cod

e), f

or e

ach

pollu

tant

. A

sum

mar

y re

port

of th

e an

nual

WR

AP

em

issi

ons

from

the

“Top

10”

are

a so

urce

s in

eac

h co

unty

and

re

serv

atio

n an

d th

e “T

op 1

0” a

rea

sour

ces

for e

ach

stat

e, tr

ibe

and

the

entir

e re

gion

(bro

ken

dow

n by

SC

C

code

), fo

r eac

h po

lluta

nt.

A s

umm

ary

repo

rt of

the

annu

al W

RA

P e

mis

sion

s fro

m o

n-ro

ad m

obile

sou

rces

in e

ach

coun

ty a

nd re

serv

atio

n an

d on

-roa

d m

obile

sou

rces

for e

ach

stat

e, tr

ibe

and

the

entir

e re

gion

(bro

ken

dow

n by

the

sixt

een

(16)

mob

ile

sour

ce c

ateg

orie

s), f

or e

ach

pollu

tant

and

dus

t fro

m p

aved

and

unp

aved

road

. A

sum

mar

y re

port

of th

e an

nual

WR

AP

em

issi

ons

from

non

-roa

d m

obile

sou

rces

in e

ach

coun

ty a

nd

rese

rvat

ion

and

non-

road

mob

ile s

ourc

es fo

r eac

h st

ate,

trib

e, a

nd th

e en

tire

regi

on (b

roke

n do

wn

by S

CC

co

de),

for e

ach

pollu

tant

. A

sum

mar

y re

port

of th

e an

nual

WR

AP

em

issi

ons

from

fire

sou

rces

in e

ach

coun

ty a

nd re

serv

atio

n an

d fir

e so

urce

s fo

r eac

h st

ate,

trib

e, a

nd th

e en

tire

regi

on (b

roke

n do

wn

by th

e 3

fire

cate

gorie

s (w

ildfir

e, p

resc

ribed

w

ild la

nd b

urni

ng, a

nd a

gric

ultu

ral b

urni

ng a

ctiv

ities

), fo

r eac

h po

lluta

nt.

A s

umm

ary

repo

rt of

the

annu

al W

RA

P e

mis

sion

s fro

m b

ioge

nic

sour

ces

in e

ach

coun

ty a

nd re

serv

atio

n an

d bi

ogen

ic s

ourc

es fo

r eac

h st

ate,

trib

e, a

nd th

e en

tire

regi

on (b

roke

n do

wn

by e

mis

sion

sou

rce

nam

e).

Dat

a re

ports

in th

e N

EI I

nput

For

mat

Ver

sion

3.0

(NIF

V3.

0) fo

r sub

mitt

al to

the

EP

A u

nder

the

CE

RR

. Fo

r sta

tiona

ry p

oint

sou

rces

, dat

a re

ports

for a

ll em

issi

on p

oint

s on

site

by

text

des

crip

tion

nam

e an

d by

Sta

ck

ID, f

or N

EI f

ile fo

rmat

sta

ck p

aram

eter

s (S

TKH

GT,

STK

DIA

M, S

TKTE

MP

, STK

FLO

W, S

TKV

EL)

, pro

duct

ion

rate

s (B

OIL

CA

P, C

AP

_UN

ITS

, TH

RU

PU

T, M

AX

RA

TE, N

ETD

C),

fuel

par

amet

ers

(HE

ATC

ON

, SU

LFC

ON

, A

SH

CO

N),

stan

dard

indu

stria

l cla

ssifi

catio

n co

de (S

IC),

loca

tion

(LA

TC, L

ON

G),

and

emis

sion

con

trols

("

pollu

tant

"_C

E, "

pollu

tant

"_C

PR

I, "p

ollu

tant

"_C

SE

C).

For s

tatio

nary

poi

nt s

ourc

es, d

ata

repo

rts fo

r all

emis

sion

poi

nts

on s

ite b

y te

xt d

escr

iptio

n na

me

and

by S

tack

ID

, for

act

ual e

mis

sion

rate

s of

eac

h po

lluta

nt, o

n an

ann

ual (

tpy)

and

on

a sh

ort t

erm

(pou

nds

per h

our)

bas

is.

This

em

issi

on d

ata

will

be

sum

med

for a

cum

ulat

ive

tota

l of e

mis

sion

s fro

m e

ach

stat

iona

ry p

oint

sou

rce.

Ad

Hoc

Q

uerie

s U

sers

sha

ll ha

ve th

e ab

ility

to d

evel

op a

nd e

xecu

te u

ser-

defin

ed q

uerie

s, a

nd o

utpu

t the

resu

lt se

t in

a va

riety

of

form

ats,

suc

h as

thro

ugh

an a

d-ho

c re

port

writ

er.

Mee

ts m

inim

um re

quire

men

ts

1

Mod

elin

g In

add

ition

to th

ese

stan

dard

repo

rts, t

he E

DM

S w

ill p

rodu

ce re

gion

al e

mis

sion

mod

el

(SM

OK

E)-

read

y em

issi

ons

inpu

t file

s fo

r the

regi

onal

vis

ibili

ty m

odel

ing

effo

rts.

Mee

ts re

quire

men

ts

3

GIS

/ M

appi

ng

The

WR

AP

ED

MS

sho

uld

incl

ude

a fu

lly fu

nctio

ning

GIS

mod

ule

that

pro

vide

s m

ultip

le to

ols

to d

ispl

ay d

ata

over

the

inte

rnet

. The

incl

usio

n of

a G

IS m

odul

e w

ill p

rovi

de a

mea

ns fo

r use

rs to

sel

ect d

ata

that

is o

f im

porta

nce

to th

em a

nd d

ispl

ay th

e da

ta in

a fa

shio

n th

at is

eas

ily u

nder

stoo

d.

Mee

ts m

inim

um re

quire

men

ts fo

r a m

appi

ng

syst

em b

ut n

ot a

true

GIS

sys

tem

. 3

The

WR

AP

ED

MS

sho

uld

incl

ude

the

follo

win

g G

IS fu

nctio

nalit

y: p

an, z

oom

, que

ry la

yer i

nfor

mat

ion,

abi

lity

to

add/

rem

ove

mul

tiple

laye

rs o

f dat

a, p

oint

and

clic

k, m

easu

re d

ista

nces

, buf

fer,

prin

t mul

tiple

siz

es o

f map

s, a

nd

sele

ct m

ap fe

atur

es b

y lin

e, re

ctan

gle,

or p

olyg

on.

Mee

ts m

inim

um re

quire

men

ts.

3

The

WR

AP

ED

MS

GIS

mod

ule

shou

ld in

clud

e th

e fo

llow

ing

laye

rs o

f dat

a: c

ount

y, s

tate

and

cou

ntry

pol

ygon

s,

triba

l res

erva

tion

poly

gons

, roa

dway

s an

d ra

ilroa

d lin

e fe

atur

es, C

AC

pol

ygon

s, in

tern

atio

nal p

olyg

ons,

m

etro

polit

an s

tatis

tical

are

as p

olyg

ons,

non

-atta

inm

ent a

rea

poly

gons

, cla

ss I

area

s po

lygo

ns, b

odie

s of

wat

er

poly

gons

, cen

sus

data

pol

ygon

s, o

ther

fede

ral l

and

poly

gons

(i.e

. nat

iona

l par

ks, m

onum

ents

, for

est,

and

refu

ges)

, and

WR

AP

mod

elin

g do

mai

n gr

id s

yste

m.

Mee

ts m

inim

um re

quire

men

ts.

3

G

IS

It sh

ould

hav

e th

e ab

ility

to s

elec

t and

dis

play

em

issi

ons

sour

ces

and

asso

ciat

ed e

mis

sion

s da

ta b

y ge

ogra

phic

al a

rea.

M

eets

min

imum

requ

irem

ents

. 3

A-6

* So

urce

doc

umen

ts:

1.

“Em

issi

ons D

ata

Man

agem

ent S

yste

m D

esig

n A

s Del

iver

ed F

inal

Rep

ort”

pre

pare

d by

E.H

. Pec

han,

Aug

ust 2

006.

2.

“E

DM

S Sc

ope

of W

ork

Dra

ft 3”

pre

pare

d by

E.H

. Pec

han,

dat

e un

know

n.

3.

“Fin

al N

eeds

Ass

essm

ent F

or E

valu

atio

n A

nd D

esig

n O

f An

Emis

sion

s Dat

a R

epor

ting,

Man

agem

ent,

And

Tra

ckin

g Sy

stem

” pr

epar

ed b

y EA

Eng

inee

ring,

Sc

ienc

e, a

nd T

echn

olog

y, Ju

ly 2

003.

A-7

Figu

re A

.1. D

atab

ase

Sche

mas

.

Sum

mar

y ta

bles

use

d by

for r

epor

ting

func

tions

by

the

web

inte

rface

SV_A

DH

OC

_QU

ERY_

FIR

ESV

_RPT

_AD

HO

C_Q

UER

Y_BI

OG

ENIC

SV_R

PT_A

DH

OC

_QU

ERY_

MO

BILE

SV_R

PT_A

DH

OC

_QU

ERY_

NO

NR

OAD

SV_R

PT_A

DH

OC

_QU

ERY_

POIN

TSV

_RPT

_AD

HO

C_Q

UER

Y_W

DU

ST

SV

_RP

T_C

AC1

SV

_RP

T_C

AC2

SV_R

PT_F

IRE1

SV

_RP

T_G

IS1

SV_R

PT_M

1SV

_RPT

_M1_

SCC

BDS

V_R

PT_

PTS

O21

SV_R

PT_

SR1

SV

_RP

T_S

R10

SV

_RP

T_S

R11

SV_R

PT_S

R11

_SC

CBD

SV

_RP

T_S

R13

SV

_RP

T_S

R14

SV_R

PT_

SR2

SV_R

PT_

SR3

SV_R

PT_S

R3_

SCC

BDSV

_RP

T_SR

4S

V_R

PT_

SR

4_S

BB

CD

SV_R

PT_S

R8_

SCC

BDSV

_RP

T_SR

9SV

_RPT

_SR

9_SC

CBD

SV_T

EMP_

RPT

_SR

ASV

_TEM

P_R

PT_S

RY

SV

__A

DH

OC

_QU

ER

Y_A

RE

A

EDM

S_T

XR

EDM

S_TX

NED

MS

_STG

EDM

S_PR

D

Each

sch

ema

cont

ains

this

set

of t

able

s:AC

TIVI

TY_A

TTR

IBU

TE_V

ALU

EAC

TIVI

TY_D

ETAI

LAC

TIVI

TY_F

IRE_

DE

TAIL

ACTI

VITY

_GEO

GR

APH

IC_D

ETAI

LAC

TIVI

TY_M

ETEO

RO

LOG

ICAL

_DET

AIL

ACTI

VITY

_PER

MIT

AR

EA

_EP

AR

EA

_PE

AR

EA

_EM

AREA

_CE

BIO

GEN

IC_E

MO

NR

OAD

_PE

ON

RO

AD_E

MPO

INT_

SIPO

INT_

EUPO

INT_

ERPO

INT_

EPPO

INT_

PEPO

INT_

EMPO

INT_

CE

TRDat

a in

serte

d fro

mN

IF M

DB

tabl

eIm

med

iate

ly lo

aded

from

TXR

tabl

es

Initi

al Q

A P

roce

ss

DB

A in

itiat

ed lo

adfro

m T

XN ta

bles

EDM

S_T

XR_A

UD

IT

EDM

S_T

XN_A

UD

IT

EDM

S_ST

G_A

UD

IT

EDM

S_PR

D_A

UD

IT

Each

sch

ema

cont

ains

this

set

of t

able

s,as

soci

ated

inde

xes,

trig

gers

, and

seq

uenc

es. A

tota

l of 8

4 ob

ject

s pe

r sch

ema.

All

tabl

es a

reem

pty.

ACTI

VITY

_ATT

RIB

UTE

_VAL

UE

ACTI

VITY

_DET

AIL

ACTI

VITY

_FIR

E_D

ETA

ILAC

TIVI

TY_G

EOG

RAP

HIC

_DET

AIL

ACTI

VITY

_MET

EOR

OLO

GIC

AL_D

ETAI

LAC

TIVI

TY_P

ERM

ITAR

EA_C

EA

RE

A_E

MA

RE

A_E

PA

RE

A_P

EB

IOG

EN

IC_E

MO

NR

OAD

_EM

ON

RO

AD

_PE

POIN

T_C

EPO

INT_

EMPO

INT_

EPPO

INT_

ER

POIN

T_E

UPO

INT_

PEP

OIN

T_S

ITR

DB

A in

itiat

ed d

elet

eat

som

e po

int (

noso

urce

cod

e, n

odo

cum

enta

tion)

DB

A in

itiat

ed lo

adfro

m T

XN

tabl

es

Dat

a up

date

s

DB

A in

spec

tion/

erro

rfix

es

Dat

a

Proc

ess

A-8

Figu

re A

-1. D

atab

ase

Sche

mas

(con

tinue

d).

EDM

S_R

EF

Look

up a

nd o

ther

refe

renc

e ta

bles

:AC

TIV

ITY

_ATT

RIB

UTE

S A

CTI

VIT

Y_C

ATE

GO

RY

AC

TIV

ITY_

TYPE

AFF

ILIA

TIO

N_T

YPE

CAC

CA

C_B

OU

ND

ARY

CO

NFI

DE

NTI

ALI

TY_I

ND

ICA

TOR

S C

ON

TAC

T_TY

PES

CO

NTR

OL_

DEV

ICE

_TY

PES

CO

NTR

OL_

EFF

ICIE

NC

Y_M

ETH

OD

S C

ON

TRO

L_ST

ATU

SES

CO

OR

DIN

ATE

_DA

TA_S

OU

RC

E_C

OD

E C

OU

NTR

IES

CO

UN

TY_B

OU

ND

ARY

CO

UN

TY_F

IPS

ELE

CTR

ON

IC_A

DD

RES

S_T

YPE_

NA

ME

EM

IS_R

ELE

ASE

_PO

INT_

TYPE

S E

MIS

SIO

N_E

ST_

ME

THO

DS

EM

ISS

ION

_TY

PES

EM

ISS

ION

_UN

IT_T

YPES

FAC

ILIT

Y_C

ATEG

OR

IES

FAC

TOR

FAC

TOR

_CA

LC_M

ETH

OD

S F

ACTO

R_S

OU

RC

E F

AC

TOR

_TYP

E F

AC

TOR

_TY

PES

FAC

TOR

_VAL

UES

HA

P_E

MIS

SIO

N_P

ERFO

RM

ANC

E_L

EVE

L H

OR

IZO

NTA

L_C

OLL

ECTI

ON

_ME

THO

DS

HO

RIZ

ON

TAL_

REF

ERE

NC

E_D

ATU

M_C

OD

INV

ALID

_UN

IT_M

AP

MA

CT

MA

CT_

CO

MP

LIA

NC

E_S

TATU

S M

ATE

RIA

L_IO

MA

TER

IALS

MAX

_EM

ISSI

ON

_RAT

E N

AIC

S P

LAN

_TAB

LE P

OLL

UTA

NT_

CA

TEG

OR

IES

PO

LLU

TAN

T_C

ATE

GO

RY

PO

LLU

TAN

TS Q

A_E

RR

OR

S R

EFE

REN

CE_

PO

INT_

CO

DE

REL

IAB

ILIT

Y_I

ND

ICAT

OR

S R

ULE

_EFF

EC

T_M

ETH

OD

S S

CC

SC

C_C

ATE

GO

RIE

S S

CC

_CA

TEG

OR

Y S

CC

_CA

TEG

OR

Y_TY

PE

SC

C_S

TAC

K_P

ARA

MS

_XTA

B_A

CTI

VE S

CC

_TIE

R S

EVE

RIT

Y_C

OD

E S

IC S

IC_S

TAC

K_P

ARA

MS

_XTA

B_A

CTI

VE S

OU

RC

E_T

YPE

S S

TATE

_CO

UN

TY_F

IPS

_QAQ

C S

TATE

_FIP

S T

AFF

TE

LEP

HO

NE_

NU

MB

ER_T

YPE

_NAM

E T

IER

TR

ANSA

CTI

ON

_TYP

ES T

RAN

SM

ITTA

L_IN

VEN

TOR

Y_TY

PES

TR

IBAL

_CO

DE

TR

IBAL

_DA

TA_C

OV

ERA

GE

TR

IBES

_CO

UN

TIE

S U

NIT

S W

EATH

ER_C

ON

DIT

ION

S X

Y_C

OO

RD

_TYP

ES Z

IPC

OD

ES9

9

ED

MS_

AP

P

Web

-inte

rface

rela

ted

tabl

es:

CO

NTA

CT_

INFO

DO

CU

ME

NTS

EMAI

L_D

ETA

ILS

EMAI

L_TE

XTEV

ENTS

EV

EN

TS_U

PLO

ADEX

POR

T_EM

AIL_

TEXT

FAQ

INVE

NTO

RY

INVE

NTO

RY_

TYP

EIN

VEN

TOR

Y_YE

AR

LIN

KSLO

GLO

G_D

ETA

ILS

MEM

BER

SM

OD

ELLI

NG

_CR

ETAR

IAM

OD

ELLI

NG

_CR

ETA

RIA

_OR

IGIN

ALN

AIC

S_C

ATEG

OR

YN

OTE

OR

GAN

IZA

TIO

NPO

LIC

Y_TE

RM

REG

ION

SR

EPO

RT_

CO

NTA

CT_

INFO

SEC

TOR

SNAP

SHO

T_D

OW

NLO

ADSU

BMIT

ED_D

ATA

TRAN

SFER

_FIL

EW

HAT

_IS_

EDM

S W

RAP

_PO

LIC

Y_TE

RM

A-9

Figure A-2. Area Emission Source Tables from the Pechan Data Model. Although fields exist to contrive

foreign keys (for example TR_PRIMARY_KEY in AREA_EP to create a one to many relationship from TR to AREA_EP) all such fields contain only null values. The same is true for the other emission source types (BIOGENIC, POINT, ONROAD).

A-10

Figure A-3. Activity Detail from the Pechan Data Model. None of these tables contain any rows.

A-11

Figure A-4. Inventory Tables from the Pechan Data Model. Although the foreign key constraints do not exist, it is possible to create them.

A-12

Figure A-5. Logging Tables from the Pechan Data Model.

Notes: EDMS_APP.LOG to EDMS_REF.QA_ERRORS – can’t create foreign key because EDMS_APP.LOG.ERROR_CODE contains 0 for all rows. EDMS_REF.QA_ERRORS does not contain a row where ERROR_CODE = 0. EDMS_APP.LOG_DETAILS to EDMS_APP.LOG – can’t create foreign key because some parent keys (LOG_ID) cannot be found. EDMS_APP.INVENTORY, EDMS_APP.LOG, EDMS_APP.NOTE to EDMS_APP.ORGANIZATION – able to create foreign keys (ORGANIZATION contains only one row) EDMS_APP.NOTE to EDMS_APP.INVENTORY – able to create foreign key.

A-13

Figure A-6. Security Tables from the Pechan Data Model.

Note: The EDMS_USER, USER_ROLE, USER_SECURITY, and USER_ORGANIZATION tables exist but are empty. A table named MEMBERS, not included in this diagram but which contains columns similar to EDMS_USER, actually holds the registered user information. It does not relate to any other tables.

A-14

Tabl

e A

-3. I

nven

tory

Ver

sion

Des

crip

tion

Inve

ntor

y ID

Inve

ntor

y D

escr

iptio

nC

omm

ents

1EP

A Pr

elim

inar

y (2

002)

Uno

ffici

al v

ersi

on o

f the

EPA

200

2 Pr

elim

ary

inve

ntor

y. I

t was

obt

aine

d fr

om th

e EP

A.

2Ac

tual

Ver

sion

1.0

Poin

t Sou

rce

Are

a So

urce

Ala

ska

Upd

ated

Inve

ntor

y fro

m D

ata

Prov

ider

EPA

2002

Pre

limin

ary

load

ed (g

ap-fi

lled)

Ariz

ona

CER

R d

ata

via

EPA

EPA

2002

Pre

limin

ary

load

ed (g

ap-fi

lled)

Ariz

ona

Mar

icop

aU

pdat

ed In

vent

ory

from

Dat

a P

rovi

der

Upd

ated

Inve

ntor

y fro

m D

ata

Pro

vide

rC

alifo

rnia

CER

R d

ata

via

EPA

CER

R d

ata

via

EPA

Col

orad

oC

ERR

dat

a vi

a EP

AC

ERR

dat

a vi

a EP

AId

aho

CER

R d

ata

via

EPA

CER

R d

ata

via

EPA

Mon

tana

CER

R d

ata

via

EPA

EPA

2002

Pre

limin

ary

load

ed (g

ap-fi

lled)

Nev

ada

CER

R d

ata

via

EPA

EPA

2002

Pre

limin

ary

load

ed (g

ap-fi

lled)

Nev

ada

Cla

rk C

oU

pdat

ed In

vent

ory

from

Dat

a P

rovi

der

Upd

ated

Inve

ntor

y fro

m D

ata

Pro

vide

rN

evad

a W

asho

e C

oU

pdat

ed In

vent

ory

from

Dat

a P

rovi

der

Upd

ated

Inve

ntor

y fro

m D

ata

Pro

vide

rN

ew M

exic

oC

ERR

dat

a vi

a EP

AEP

A 20

02 P

relim

inar

y lo

aded

(gap

-fille

d)N

ew M

exic

o Be

rnal

illo C

oU

pdat

ed In

vent

ory

from

Dat

a P

rovi

der

CE

RR

dat

a vi

a E

PA

Nor

th D

akot

aC

ERR

dat

a vi

a EP

AEP

A 20

02 P

relim

inar

y lo

aded

(gap

-fille

d)O

rego

nC

ERR

dat

a vi

a EP

AC

ERR

dat

a vi

a EP

AO

rego

n La

ne C

ount

yC

ERR

dat

a vi

a EP

AC

ERR

dat

a vi

a EP

AS

outh

Dak

ota

CER

R d

ata

via

EPA

EPA

2002

Pre

limin

ary

load

ed (g

ap-fi

lled)

Uta

hC

ERR

dat

a vi

a EP

AC

ERR

dat

a vi

a EP

AW

ashi

ngto

nU

pdat

ed In

vent

ory

from

Dat

a P

rovi

der

CE

RR

dat

a vi

a E

PA

Was

hing

ton

Puge

t Sou

ndC

ERR

dat

a vi

a EP

AC

ERR

dat

a vi

a EP

AW

ashi

ngto

n O

lym

pic

CER

R d

ata

via

EPA

CER

R d

ata

via

EPA

Wyo

min

gU

pdat

ed In

vent

ory

from

Dat

a P

rovi

der

Upd

ated

Inve

ntor

y fro

m D

ata

Pro

vide

rTr

ibal

Rev

ised

dat

a re

ceiv

ed, p

oten

tial o

verla

ps u

nder

ana

lysi

sFo

rt Pe

ck d

ata

repo

rted,

ove

rlap

anal

ysis

pen

ding

. La

Post

a An

alys

is p

endi

ngO

ther

Sec

tors

Bio

geni

c - D

ata

load

ed fr

om R

egio

nal M

odel

ing

Cen

ter r

esul

ts.

Fire

- M

odel

ed d

ata

to b

e lo

aded

into

futu

re in

vent

ory

vers

ion.

Som

e da

ta p

rovi

ders

pro

vide

d fir

e da

ta in

are

a so

urce

sub

mitt

als.

Win

d-bl

own

Dus

t - M

odel

ed d

ata

into

be

load

ed to

futu

re in

vent

ory

vers

ion.

3EP

A Ve

rsio

n 3

(200

1)

5Tr

aini

ngTh

is in

vent

ory

cont

ains

dat

a of

unc

erta

in a

nd/o

r fic

titio

us o

rigin

and

is m

eant

onl

y fo

r tra

inin

g pu

rpos

es.

Uno

ffici

al v

ersi

on o

f the

EPA

200

1 Ve

rsio

n 3

inve

ntor

y. I

t was

obt

aine

d fr

om th

e EP

A.

Non

-Roa

d M

obile

- D

ata

gap-

fille

d fro

m 2

002

EP

A P

relim

inar

y In

vent

ory

On-

Roa

d M

obile

- D

ata

gap-

fille

d fro

m 2

002

EPA

Prel

imin

ary

Inve

ntor

y

A-15

Tabl

e A

-3. I

nven

tory

Ver

sion

Des

crip

tion

(con

tinue

d)

Inve

ntor

y ID

Inve

ntor

y D

escr

iptio

nC

omm

ents

6Ac

tual

Ver

sion

0.9

(200

2)Th

is in

vent

ory

repr

esen

ts o

nly

data

that

was

sub

mitt

ed a

nd in

clud

es n

o ga

p-fil

led

info

rmat

ion.

Poi

nt S

ourc

eA

rea

Sou

rce

Ala

ska

Upd

ated

Inve

ntor

y fro

m D

ata

Pro

vide

rA

rizon

aC

ER

R d

ata

via

EP

AA

rizon

a M

aric

opa

Upd

ated

Inve

ntor

y fro

m D

ata

Prov

ider

Upd

ated

Inve

ntor

y fro

m D

ata

Prov

ider

Cal

iforn

iaC

ERR

dat

a vi

a EP

AC

ERR

dat

a vi

a EP

AC

olor

ado

CER

R d

ata

via

EPA

CER

R d

ata

via

EPA

Idah

oC

ER

R d

ata

via

EP

AC

ER

R d

ata

via

EP

AM

onta

naC

ER

R d

ata

via

EP

AN

evad

aC

ERR

dat

a vi

a EP

AN

evad

a C

lark

Co

Upd

ated

Inve

ntor

y fro

m D

ata

Pro

vide

rU

pdat

ed In

vent

ory

from

Dat

a P

rovi

der

Nev

ada

Was

hoe

Co

Upd

ated

Inve

ntor

y fro

m D

ata

Pro

vide

rU

pdat

ed In

vent

ory

from

Dat

a P

rovi

der

New

Mex

ico

CER

R d

ata

via

EPA

New

Mex

ico

Ber

nalill

o C

oU

pdat

ed In

vent

ory

from

Dat

a P

rovi

der

CE

RR

dat

a vi

a E

PA

Nor

th D

akot

aC

ER

R d

ata

via

EP

AO

rego

nC

ER

R d

ata

via

EP

AC

ER

R d

ata

via

EP

AO

rego

n La

ne C

ount

yC

ER

R d

ata

via

EP

AC

ER

R d

ata

via

EP

AS

outh

Dak

ota

CE

RR

dat

a vi

a E

PA

Uta

hC

ERR

dat

a vi

a EP

AC

ERR

dat

a vi

a EP

AW

ashi

ngto

nU

pdat

ed In

vent

ory

from

Dat

a P

rovi

der

CE

RR

dat

a vi

a E

PA

Was

hing

ton

Puge

t Sou

ndC

ER

R d

ata

via

EP

AC

ER

R d

ata

via

EP

AW

ashi

ngto

n O

lym

pic

CE

RR

dat

a vi

a E

PA

CE

RR

dat

a vi

a E

PA

Wyo

min

gU

pdat

ed In

vent

ory

from

Dat

a Pr

ovid

erU

pdat

ed In

vent

ory

from

Dat

a Pr

ovid

erTr

ibal

Rev

ised

dat

a re

ceiv

ed, p

oten

tial o

verla

ps u

nder

ana

lysi

sR

evis

ed d

ata

rece

ived

, pot

entia

l ove

rlaps

und

er a

naly

sis

Oth

er S

ecto

rsB

ioge

nic

- Dat

a lo

aded

from

Reg

iona

l Mod

elin

g C

ente

r res

ults

.Fi

re, N

on-R

oad

- som

e A

rea

subm

ittal

s in

clud

ed e

mis

sion

s fro

m th

ese

sect

ors,

and

they

hav

e be

en in

clud

ed.

7Ac

tual

Ver

sion

1.1

(200

2)Po

int S

ourc

eA

rea

Sour

ceA

lask

aU

pdat

ed In

vent

ory

from

Dat

a Pr

ovid

erEP

A 20

02 P

relim

inar

y lo

aded

(gap

-fille

d)Ar

izon

aC

ERR

dat

a vi

a EP

AEP

A 20

02 P

relim

inar

y lo

aded

(gap

-fille

d)Ar

izon

a M

aric

opa

Upd

ated

Inve

ntor

y fro

m D

ata

Pro

vide

rU

pdat

ed In

vent

ory

from

Dat

a P

rovi

der

Cal

iforn

iaC

ERR

dat

a vi

a EP

AC

ERR

dat

a vi

a EP

AC

olor

ado

CER

R d

ata

via

EPA

CER

R d

ata

via

EPA

Idah

oC

ERR

dat

a vi

a EP

AC

ERR

dat

a vi

a EP

AM

onta

naC

ERR

dat

a vi

a EP

AEP

A 20

02 P

relim

inar

y lo

aded

(gap

-fille

d)N

evad

aC

ERR

dat

a vi

a EP

AEP

A 20

02 P

relim

inar

y lo

aded

(gap

-fille

d)

A-16

Tabl

e A

-3. I

nven

tory

Ver

sion

Des

crip

tion

(con

tinue

d)

Inve

ntor

y ID

Inve

ntor

y D

escr

iptio

nC

omm

ents

7Ac

tual

Ver

sion

1.1

(200

2)Po

int S

ourc

eA

rea

Sour

ceN

evad

a C

lark

Co

Upd

ated

Inve

ntor

y fro

m D

ata

Pro

vide

rU

pdat

ed In

vent

ory

from

Dat

a P

rovi

der

Nev

ada

Was

hoe

Co

Upd

ated

Inve

ntor

y fro

m D

ata

Pro

vide

rU

pdat

ed In

vent

ory

from

Dat

a P

rovi

der

New

Mex

ico

CER

R d

ata

via

EPA

EPA

2002

Pre

limin

ary

load

ed (g

ap-fi

lled)

New

Mex

ico

Bern

alillo

Co

Upd

ated

Inve

ntor

y fro

m D

ata

Pro

vide

rC

ER

R d

ata

via

EP

AN

orth

Dak

ota

CER

R d

ata

via

EPA

EPA

2002

Pre

limin

ary

load

ed (g

ap-fi

lled)

Ore

gon

CER

R d

ata

via

EPA

CER

R d

ata

via

EPA

Ore

gon

Lane

Cou

nty

CER

R d

ata

via

EPA

CER

R d

ata

via

EPA

Sou

th D

akot

aC

ERR

dat

a vi

a EP

AEP

A 20

02 P

relim

inar

y lo

aded

(gap

-fille

d)U

tah

CER

R d

ata

via

EPA

CER

R d

ata

via

EPA

Was

hing

ton

Upd

ated

Inve

ntor

y fro

m D

ata

Pro

vide

rC

ER

R d

ata

via

EP

AW

ashi

ngto

n Pu

get S

ound

CER

R d

ata

via

EPA

CER

R d

ata

via

EPA

Was

hing

ton

Oly

mpi

cC

ERR

dat

a vi

a EP

AC

ERR

dat

a vi

a EP

AW

yom

ing

Upd

ated

Inve

ntor

y fro

m D

ata

Pro

vide

rU

pdat

ed In

vent

ory

from

Dat

a P

rovi

der

Trib

alR

evis

ed d

ata

rece

ived

, pot

entia

l ove

rlaps

und

er a

naly

sis

Rev

ised

dat

a re

ceiv

ed, p

oten

tial o

verla

ps u

nder

ana

lysi

s

Oth

er S

ecto

rsN

on-R

oad

Mob

ile -

Dat

a lo

aded

from

Mod

elin

g in

itiat

ive,

exc

eptio

n: C

A - l

ocom

otiv

e, c

omm

eric

al m

arin

e an

d ai

rcra

ft w

ere

mod

eled

, oth

erw

ise

gap-

fille

d fro

m E

PA 2

002

prel

imin

ary

On-

road

Mob

ile -

Dat

a ga

p-fil

led

from

200

2 EP

A Pr

elim

inar

y In

vent

ory

Bio

geni

c - D

ata

load

ed fr

om R

egio

nal M

odel

ing

Cen

ter r

esul

ts.

Fire

- M

odel

ed d

ata

to b

e lo

aded

into

futu

re in

vent

ory

vers

ion.

Som

e da

ta p

rovi

ders

pro

vide

d fir

e da

ta in

are

a so

urce

sub

mitt

als.

Win

d-bl

own

Dus

t - M

odel

ed d

ata

into

be

load

ed to

futu

re in

vent

ory

vers

ion.

Cor

rect

ions

/Add

ition

s fo

r Inv

ento

ry 7

Cor

tina

Trib

e A

rea

sour

ce d

ata

has

been

add

edR

evis

ed A

rea

and

Poi

nt s

ourc

e da

ta w

as p

rovi

ded

by W

yom

ing

Rev

ised

Poi

nt s

ourc

e da

ta w

as p

rovi

ded

by N

evad

aPo

int s

ourc

e da

ta w

as a

dded

for t

he fo

llow

ing

tribe

s: C

abaz

on, F

ort M

ojav

e, F

ort P

eck,

and

Sho

shon

e/Ba

nnoc

k

8Ac

tual

Ver

sion

1.2

Sect

o rD

ata

Prov

ider

Poin

t

Non

-Fire

Age

ncy

Dat

a re

view

ed a

nd s

ubm

itted

by

ER

G

Fire

Inve

ntor

y pr

epar

ed b

y A

ir S

cien

ces

Are

a

Non

Oil

and

Gas

Agen

cy D

ata

revi

ewed

and

sub

mitt

ed b

y E

RG

O

il an

d G

asIn

vent

ory

prep

ared

by

ER

GN

on-r

oad

Mob

ileIn

vent

ory

prep

ared

by

EN

VIR

ON

On-

Roa

d M

obile

Inve

ntor

y pr

epar

ed b

y E

NVI

RO

NB

ioge

nic

Inve

ntor

y m

odel

ed b

y th

e R

egio

nal M

odel

ing

Cen

ter

Extra

are

a so

urce

reco

rds

(from

the

gap-

fillin

g pr

oces

s) a

ttrib

uted

to C

lark

and

Was

hoe

Cou

ntie

s, N

V, h

ave

been

rem

oved

.

A-17

Tabl

e A

-4. O

lder

Inve

ntor

y C

heck

list (

Poin

t Sou

rce

Emis

sion

s)

EP

A P

relim

inar

y (2

002)

Actu

al V

ersi

on 1

.0EP

A Ve

rsio

n 3

(200

1)Tr

aini

ngAc

tual

Ver

sion

0.9

Actu

al V

ersi

on 1

.1A

ctua

l Ver

sion

1.2

FIPS

Cod

eSt

ate/

Trib

al N

ame

Inve

ntor

y 1

Inve

ntor

y 2

Inve

ntor

y 3

Inve

ntor

y 5

Inve

ntor

y 6

Inve

ntor

y 7

Inve

ntor

y 8

02A

lask

a04

Ariz

ona

06C

alifo

rnia

08C

olor

ado

16Id

aho

30M

onta

na32

Nev

ada

35N

ew M

exic

o38

Nor

th D

akot

a41

Ore

gon

46S

outh

Dak

ota

49U

tah

53W

ashi

ngto

n56

Wyo

min

g

101

Con

fede

rate

d Tr

ibes

of t

he C

olvi

lle R

eser

vatio

n,

WA

124

Con

fede

rate

d Tr

ibes

and

Ban

ds o

f the

Yak

ama

Nat

ion,

WA

143

Con

fede

rate

d Tr

ibes

of t

he U

mat

illa

Res

erva

tion,

OR

180

Sho

shon

e-B

anno

ck T

ribes

of t

he F

ort H

all

Res

erva

tion,

ID

181

Coe

ur D

'Ale

ne T

ribe

of th

e C

oeur

D'A

lene

R

eser

vatio

n, ID

182

Nez

Per

ce T

ribe,

ID20

2C

row

Trib

e, M

T

203

Con

fede

rate

d Sa

lish

and

Koot

enai

Trib

es, M

T

206

Ass

inib

oine

and

Sio

ux T

ribes

of t

he F

ort P

eck

Indi

an R

eser

vatio

n, M

T20

7N

orth

ern

Che

yenn

e, M

T

281

Ara

paho

e Tr

ibe

of th

e W

ind

Riv

er R

eser

vatio

n,

WY

303

Spi

rit L

ake

Trib

e, N

D

568

Cab

azon

Ban

d of

the

Cha

uilla

Mis

sion

Indi

ans

of th

e C

abaz

on R

eser

vatio

n, C

A

577

La P

osta

Ban

d of

Die

guen

o M

issi

on In

dian

s of

th

e La

Pos

ta In

dian

Res

erva

tion,

CA

604

Fort

Moj

ave

Indi

an T

ribe

of A

Z, C

A &

NV

610

Toho

no O

'Odh

am N

atio

n, A

Z

614

Gila

Riv

er In

dian

Com

mun

ity o

f the

Gila

Riv

er

Indi

an R

eser

vatio

n, A

Z

615

Sal

t Riv

er P

ima-

Mar

icop

a In

dian

Com

mun

ity o

f th

e S

alt R

iver

Res

erva

tion,

AZ

707

Pue

blo

of L

agun

a, N

M71

5P

uebl

o of

San

ta A

na, N

M

751

Ute

Mou

ntai

n Tr

ibe

of th

e U

te M

ount

ain

Res

erva

tion,

CO

, NM

& U

T78

0N

avaj

o N

atio

n, A

Z, N

M &

UT

750

Sou

ther

n U

tes

Dat

a In

vent

ory

A-18

Ta

ble

A-5

. Old

er In

vent

ory

Che

cklis

t (A

rea

Sour

ce E

mis

sion

s)

EP

A Pr

elim

inar

y (2

002)

Actu

al V

ersi

on 1

.0EP

A Ve

rsio

n 3

(200

1)Tr

aini

ngAc

tual

Ver

sion

0.9

Actu

al V

ersi

on 1

.1Ac

tual

Ver

sion

1.2

FIPS

Cod

eSt

ate/

Trib

al N

ame

Inve

ntor

y 1

Inve

ntor

y 2

Inve

ntor

y 3

Inve

ntor

y 5

Inve

ntor

y 6

Inve

ntor

y 7

Inve

ntor

y 8

02Al

aska

04Ar

izon

a06

Cal

iforn

ia08

Col

orad

o16

Idah

o30

Mon

tana

32N

evad

a35

New

Mex

ico

38N

orth

Dak

ota

41O

rego

n46

Sout

h D

akot

a49

Uta

h53

Was

hing

ton

56W

yom

ing

143

Con

fede

rate

d Tr

ibes

of t

he U

mat

illa

Res

erva

tion,

OR

182

Nez

Per

ce T

ribe,

ID20

2C

row

Trib

e, M

T20

4Fo

rt Be

lkna

p, M

T

206

Assi

nibo

ine

and

Siou

x Tr

ibes

of t

he F

ort

Peck

Indi

an R

eser

vatio

n, M

T20

7N

orth

ern

Che

yenn

e, M

T

281

Arap

ahoe

Trib

e of

the

Win

d R

iver

R

eser

vatio

n, W

Y30

3Sp

irit L

ake

Trib

e, N

D51

3C

ortin

a R

anch

eria

549

Bish

op P

aiut

e Tr

ibe

577

La P

osta

Ban

d of

Die

guen

o M

issi

on

Indi

ans

of th

e La

Pos

ta In

dian

R

eser

vatio

n, C

A

585

Paum

a-Yu

ima

Band

of L

uise

no M

issi

on

Indi

ans

614

Gila

Riv

er In

dian

Com

mun

ity o

f the

Gila

R

iver

Indi

an R

eser

vatio

n, A

Z

615

Salt

Riv

er P

ima-

Mar

icop

a In

dian

C

omm

unity

of t

he S

alt R

iver

R

eser

vatio

n, A

Z

624

Paiu

te-S

hosh

one

of th

e Lo

ne P

ine

Com

mun

ity70

3Pu

eblo

of A

com

a70

7Pu

eblo

of L

agun

a, N

M71

5Pu

eblo

of S

anta

Ana

, NM

751

Ute

Mou

ntai

n Tr

ibe

of th

e U

te M

ount

ain

Res

erva

tion,

CO

, NM

& U

T78

0N

avaj

o N

atio

n, A

Z, N

M &

UT

750

Sout

hern

Ute

s40

5Fo

nd d

u La

c Tr

ibe

(MN

)

A-19

Ta

ble

A-6

. Old

er In

vent

ory

Che

cklis

t (B

ioge

nics

)

EPA

Prel

imin

ary

(200

2)Ac

tual

Ver

sion

1.0

EPA

Vers

ion

3 (2

001)

Trai

ning

Actu

al V

ersi

on 0

.9Ac

tual

Ver

sion

1.1

Actu

al V

ersi

on 1

.2FI

PS C

ode

Stat

e/Tr

ibal

Nam

eIn

vent

ory

1In

vent

ory

2In

vent

ory

3In

vent

ory

5In

vent

ory

6In

vent

ory

7In

vent

ory

802

Alas

ka04

Ariz

ona

06C

alifo

rnia

08C

olor

ado

16Id

aho

30M

onta

na32

Nev

ada

35N

ew M

exic

o38

Nor

th D

akot

a41

Ore

gon

46So

uth

Dak

ota

49U

tah

53W

ashi

ngto

n56

Wyo

min

g

Ta

ble

A-7

. Old

er In

vent

ory

Che

cklis

t (O

n-R

oad

Mob

ile E

mis

sion

s)

EP

A P

relim

inar

y (2

002)

Act

ual V

ersi

on 1

.0EP

A Ve

rsio

n 3

(200

1)Tr

aini

ngAc

tual

Ver

sion

0.9

Actu

al V

ersi

on 1

.1Ac

tual

Ver

sion

1.2

FIPS

Cod

eSt

ate/

Trib

al N

ame

Inve

ntor

y 1

Inve

ntor

y 2

Inve

ntor

y 3

Inve

ntor

y 5

Inve

ntor

y 6

Inve

ntor

y 7

Inve

ntor

y 8

02A

lask

a04

Ariz

ona

06C

alifo

rnia

08C

olor

ado

16Id

aho

30M

onta

na32

Nev

ada

35N

ew M

exic

o38

Nor

th D

akot

a41

Ore

gon

46S

outh

Dak

ota

49U

tah

53W

ashi

ngto

n56

Wyo

min

g

A-20

Ta

ble

A-8

. Old

er In

vent

ory

Che

cklis

t (N

on-R

oad

Mob

ile E

mis

sion

s)

EP

A Pr

elim

inar

y (2

002)

Actu

al V

ersi

on 1

.0EP

A Ve

rsio

n 3

(200

1)Tr

aini

ngAc

tual

Ver

sion

0.9

Actu

al V

ersi

on 1

.1Ac

tual

Ver

sion

1.2

FIPS

Cod

eSt

ate/

Trib

al N

ame

Inve

ntor

y 1

Inve

ntor

y 2

Inve

ntor

y 3

Inve

ntor

y 5

Inve

ntor

y 6

Inve

ntor

y 7

Inve

ntor

y 8

02Al

aska

04A

rizon

a06

Cal

iforn

ia08

Col

orad

o16

Idah

o30

Mon

tana

32N

evad

a35

New

Mex

ico

38N

orth

Dak

ota

41O

rego

n46

Sout

h D

akot

a49

Uta

h53

Was

hing

ton

56W

yom

ing

A-21

Tabl

e A

-9.

Inve

ntor

y 9

Che

cklis

t (Po

int S

ourc

e Em

issi

ons)

Prod

uctio

n Ta

bles

FIPS

Cod

eSt

ate/

Trib

al N

ame

Dat

a co

mpl

ete

and

corr

ect

for I

nvID

9 -

2002

Fin

al V

-2.0

File

for m

issi

ng/u

pdat

ed d

ata

02Al

aska

04A

rizon

a06

Cal

iforn

ia08

Col

orad

o16

Idah

o30

Mon

tana

32N

evad

a35

New

Mex

ico

38N

orth

Dak

ota

41O

rego

n46

Sou

th D

akot

a49

Uta

h53

Was

hing

ton

revi

sion

s no

t inc

orpo

rate

dC

ompi

led

WR

AP In

vent

ory

Poi

nt -

NIF

_FIN

.zip

56W

yom

ing

101

Con

fede

rate

d Tr

ibes

of t

he C

olvi

lle R

eser

vatio

n, W

A12

4C

onfe

dera

ted

Trib

es a

nd B

ands

of t

he Y

akam

a N

atio

n, W

A14

3C

onfe

dera

ted

Trib

es o

f the

Um

atilla

Res

erva

tion,

OR

180

Sho

shon

e-Ba

nnoc

k Tr

ibes

of t

he F

ort H

all R

eser

vatio

n, ID

181

Coe

ur D

'Ale

ne T

ribe

of th

e C

oeur

D'A

lene

Res

erva

tion,

ID18

2N

ez P

erce

Trib

e, ID

data

mis

sing

Nez

Per

ce.m

db20

2C

row

Trib

e, M

Tda

ta m

issi

ngC

row

Trib

e.m

db20

3C

onfe

dera

ted

Sal

ish

and

Koo

tena

i Trib

es, M

Tda

ta m

issi

ngR

esub

mis

sion

_Sal

ishK

oote

nai.m

db20

6A

ssin

iboi

ne a

nd S

ioux

Trib

es o

f the

For

t Pec

k In

dian

Res

erva

tion,

MT

207

Nor

ther

n C

heye

nne,

MT

data

mis

sing

Nor

ther

nChe

yenn

e.m

db28

1A

rapa

hoe

Trib

e of

the

Win

d R

iver

Res

erva

tion,

WY

303

Spiri

t Lak

e Tr

ibe,

ND

data

mis

sing

Spiri

tLak

eNat

ion.

mdb

568

Cab

azon

Ban

d of

the

Cha

uilla

Mis

sion

Indi

ans

of th

e C

abaz

on R

eser

vatio

n, C

A57

7La

Pos

ta B

and

of D

iegu

eno

Mis

sion

Indi

ans

of th

e La

Pos

ta In

dian

Res

erva

tion,

CA

604

Fort

Moj

ave

Indi

an T

ribe

of A

Z, C

A &

NV

610

Toho

no O

'Odh

am N

atio

n, A

Z61

4G

ila R

iver

Indi

an C

omm

unity

of t

he G

ila R

iver

Indi

an R

eser

vatio

n, A

Z61

5S

alt R

iver

Pim

a-M

aric

opa

Indi

an C

omm

unity

of t

he S

alt R

iver

Res

erva

tion,

AZ

revi

sion

s no

t inc

orpo

rate

dTr

ibal

Rev

isio

ns_F

IN.z

ip70

7P

uebl

o of

Lag

una,

NM

715

Pue

blo

of S

anta

Ana

, NM

751

Ute

Mou

ntai

n Tr

ibe

of th

e U

te M

ount

ain

Res

erva

tion,

CO

, NM

& U

T78

0N

avaj

o N

atio

n, A

Z, N

M &

UT

750

Sou

ther

n U

tes

data

mis

sing

triba

l lan

ds C

O p

lant

s w

ith e

mis

sion

s.xl

s

A-22

Tabl

e A

-10.

Inve

ntor

y 9

Che

cklis

t (A

rea

Sour

ce E

mis

sion

s)

Pr

oduc

tion

Tabl

esFI

PS C

ode

Stat

e/Tr

ibal

Nam

eD

ata

com

plet

e an

d co

rrec

tfo

r Inv

ID 9

- 20

02 F

inal

V-2

.0Fi

le fo

r mis

sing

/upd

ated

dat

a02

Alas

ka04

Ariz

ona

06C

alifo

rnia

08C

olor

ado

16Id

aho

30M

onta

na32

Nev

ada

35N

ew M

exic

o38

Nor

th D

akot

a41

Ore

gon

46So

uth

Dak

ota

49U

tah

53W

ashi

ngto

n56

Wyo

min

g14

3C

onfe

dera

ted

Trib

es o

f the

Um

atilla

Res

erva

tion,

OR

data

mis

sing

Res

ubm

issi

on_T

ribal

Non

Poin

t.mdb

182

Nez

Per

ce T

ribe,

IDda

ta m

issi

ngN

ezPe

rce.

mdb

202

Cro

w T

ribe,

MT

data

mis

sing

Cro

wTr

ibe.

mdb

204

Fort

Belk

nap,

MT

data

mis

sing

no d

ata

rece

ived

206

Assi

nibo

ine

and

Siou

x Tr

ibes

of t

he F

ort P

eck

Indi

an

Res

erva

tion,

MT

data

cor

rect

, SC

C's

231

0 &

2294

mis

sing

data

for m

issi

ng S

CC

's in

clud

ed in

Res

ubm

issi

on_T

ribal

Non

Poin

t.mdb

207

Nor

ther

n C

heye

nne,

MT

data

mis

sing

Nor

ther

nChe

yenn

e.m

db28

1Ar

apah

oe T

ribe

of th

e W

ind

Riv

er R

eser

vatio

n, W

Y30

3Sp

irit L

ake

Trib

e, N

Dda

ta m

issi

ngSp

iritL

akeN

atio

n.m

db51

3C

ortin

a R

anch

eria

549

Bish

op P

aiut

e Tr

ibe

data

mis

sing

Res

ubm

issi

on_T

ribal

Non

Poin

t.mdb

577

La P

osta

Ban

d of

Die

guen

o M

issi

on In

dian

s of

the

La P

osta

In

dian

Res

erva

tion,

CA

data

cor

rect

, SC

C's

240

1 &

2465

mis

sing

data

for m

issi

ng S

CC

's in

clud

ed in

Res

ubm

issi

on_T

ribal

Non

Poin

t.mdb

585

Paum

a-Yu

ima

Band

of L

uise

no M

issi

on In

dian

sda

ta m

issi

ngR

esub

mis

sion

_Trib

alN

onPo

int.m

db

614

Gila

Riv

er In

dian

Com

mun

ity o

f the

Gila

Riv

er In

dian

R

eser

vatio

n, A

Zda

ta m

issi

ngR

esub

mis

sion

_Trib

alN

onPo

int.m

db

615

Salt

Riv

er P

ima-

Mar

icop

a In

dian

Com

mun

ity o

f the

Sal

t Riv

er

Res

erva

tion,

AZ

data

mis

sing

Res

ubm

issi

on_T

ribal

Non

Poin

t.mdb

624

Paiu

te-S

hosh

one

of th

e Lo

ne P

ine

Com

mun

it yda

ta m

issi

ngR

esub

mis

sion

_Trib

alN

onPo

int.m

db70

3Pu

eblo

of A

com

ada

ta m

issi

ngR

esub

mis

sion

_Trib

alN

onPo

int.m

db70

7Pu

eblo

of L

agun

a, N

Mda

ta m

issi

ngR

esub

mis

sion

_Trib

alN

onPo

int.m

db71

5Pu

eblo

of S

anta

Ana

, NM

data

mis

sing

Res

ubm

issi

on_T

ribal

Non

Poin

t.mdb

751

Ute

Mou

ntai

n Tr

ibe

of th

e U

te M

ount

ain

Res

erva

tion,

CO

, NM

&

UT

data

cor

rect

, SC

C 2

310

data

mis

sing

data

for m

issi

ng S

CC

's in

clud

ed in

Res

ubm

issi

on_T

ribal

Non

Poin

t.mdb

780

Nav

ajo

Nat

ion,

AZ,

NM

& U

Tda

ta c

orre

ct, S

CC

210

3 da

ta m

issi

ngda

ta fo

r mis

sing

SC

C's

incl

uded

in N

avaj

oNat

ion_

Area

Com

mer

cial

Hea

ting.

mdb

750

Sout

hern

Ute

sda

ta m

issi

ngtri

bal l

ands

CO

pla

nts

with

em

issi

ons.

xls

A-23

Table A-11. Inventory 9 Checklist (Biogenics) Production Tables

FIPS Code State/Tribal Name Data complete and correct

for InvID 9 - 2002 Final V-2.002 Alaska04 Arizona06 California08 Colorado16 Idaho30 Montana32 Nevada35 New Mexico38 North Dakota41 Oregon46 South Dakota49 Utah53 Washington56 Wyoming

Table A-12. Inventory 9 Checklist (On-Road Mobile Emissions) Production Tables

FIPS Code State/Tribal Name Data complete and correct

for InvID 9 - 2002 Final V-2.002 Alaska04 Arizona06 California08 Colorado16 Idaho30 Montana32 Nevada35 New Mexico38 North Dakota41 Oregon46 South Dakota49 Utah53 Washington56 Wyoming

A-24

Table A-13. Inventory 9 Checklist (Non-Road Mobile Emissions) Production Tables

FIPS Code State/Tribal Name Data complete and correct

for InvID 9 - 2002 Final V-2.002 Alaska04 Arizona06 California08 Colorado16 Idaho30 Montana32 Nevada35 New Mexico38 North Dakota41 Oregon46 South Dakota49 Utah53 Washington56 Wyoming

A-25

Select rows from SUBMITTED_DATA WHERE FILE_TO_TXR_STATUS = 0

Open log file

For each row

write data to pipe delimited output line and write to log file

Trim(ObjData("TRANFER_JOB_ID")) & "|" &Trim(ObjData("INVENTORY_ID")) & "|" &Replace(UCase(Trim(ObjData("SECTOR_NAME"))), "AF", "P") & "|" &Trim(ObjData("UPLOAD_FOLDER_PTAH")) &"|" & Trim(ObjData("FILE_NAME")) & "|" &Trim(ObjData("UPDATED_DATE")) & "|" &Trim(ObjData("EMAIL")) & "|" &Trim(ObjData("NAME")) & "|" &Trim(ObjData("ORGANIZATION_ID"))

Close log file

Open log file

End for each row

Do while not EOF

Read line in log file

CallExecuteTransfer

With args placed in arraysplit from log file line

Datetimestamp _Bulk_Export.txt

End loop

RunAllPendingExports

EndRunAllPendingExports

ExecuteTransfer

CallFILE_TO_TXR

Return ok?

CallTXR_TO_TXN

Return ok?

CallTXN_MASTERDIAG

Return ok?

Nothing. Commented out line 'TXN To STG

Nothing. Commented outlines referring to error and

emailing uploader regardingthe error

yes

yes

yes

no

no

no

End ExecuteTransfer

EDMSUPLOAD.exe -Automated Data

Submittal Process

See page A-27

See page A-28

See page A-28

Figure A-7. Automated Data Submittal Process

A-26

FILE_TO_TXR

Open log file Tranfer_Job_ID_UploadTool_Log.txt

Call UnZipUploadedFile

Return ok?

Read MS AccessFile Name

Unzippedfile

yes

File name read ok?

Write errormessage to logfileno

Write errormessage to logfile no

Call WriteUploadReutineRemarks

File other than MDBfound in zip file

Set TRANSFER_STARTED Flagin SBMITED_DATA Table for the

TRANFER_JOB_ID

yes

Connect to the MDB file (Jet Oledb)

Connection ok?

yes

no

Get Select SQL foreach expected

table for the sectorTBLPOINTTR, etc.

CASE SECTOR

POINT, P

Get list of tablesfrom MDB file

MDB has thecorrect tables?

no

CASE TABLENAME callsPOINT_INSERT_TABLENAME

(Example) CASE TBLPOINTTRCall POINT_INSERT_TBLPOINTTR

Errors and successes logged each step

yes

For Each MDB Table

For Each MDB Table Row

Follows same logic for other SECTORS:CASE "AREA", "A", "NONROAD MOBILE", "N"

CASE "ONROAD MOBILE", "M"

End For Each MDB Table Row

End For Each MDB Table

All rows for all tablesinserted w/out error?

Commit inserts toTXR tablesyesRollback inserts

from TXR tables no

End FILE_TO_TXR

End FILE_TO_TXRReturn error code set

Return error code set

EDMSUPLOAD.exe -Automated Data

Submittal Processcontinued

Figure A-7. Automated Data Submittal Process (continued).

A-27

TXR_TO_TXN

CASE SECT RO

CASEAREA, A, NONROAD MOBILE, N

CALL Stored Procedureproc_ETL_TXRtoTXN_Area

CASEPOINT, P

CALL Stored Procedureproc_ETL_TXRtoTXN_point

CASEONROAD MOBILE, M

CALL Stored Procedureproc_ETL_TXRtoTXN_Mobile

EDMSUPLOAD.exe -Automated Data

Submittal Processcontinued

Bulk Insert records to TXNtables from TXR

in tables

Return ok? Commit inserts toTXN tables

Rollback insertsfrom TXN tables

EndTXR_TO_TXN

Success/errors loggedeach step

TXN_MASTER IAGD

CASE SECT RO

CASEAREA, A, NONROAD MOBILE, N

CALL Stored ProcedurepA_MasterDiagnose

CASEPOINT, P

CALL Stored ProcedurepP_MasterDiagnose

CASEONROAD MOBILE, M

CALL Stored ProcedurepM_MasterDiagnose

Each calls a series of stored pr that check fornulls, valid codes, parent/child records, etc.

ocedures

Call Write_TXN_MASTERDIAG_Remarksupdates SUBMITED_DATA.REMARKS,

SUBMITED_DATA.TXN_MASTERDIAG_STATUS,SUBMITED_DATA.OVERALL_STATUS if error These checks are done by issuing

update statements with where clausesthat break the rules.

If 0 rows are affected, the procedurereturns a message that the check hasbeen done.

If >0 rows are affected then theprocedure returns a message that therule is not satisfied. The relevantrecords are flagged with the log id.

END TXN_MAST DIAGER

Figure A-7. Automated Data Submittal Process (continued).

A-28

For each rowflagged as bad

Inspect row

Data fixable byDBA?

Fix data

Apply ‘I’ todisposition_status field

yes

no

End for each rowflagged as bad

Data Submittal Process:Assumed steps taken by DBA

Select data from EDMS_TXN schema wheresubmittal_flag = ‘A’ or null and disposition status

<> ‘I’ and insert into EDMS_STG schema

Submittal flag = ‘A’ means onlyAdd records selected

pAll_masterprepforviews

Stored procedures

Begin Manualprocessing

End manualprocessing

Begin pAll_masterprepforviews

pAll_PrepforViewsDelInact Deletes rows wheredisposition_status=’I'

Series of stored procedures

pAll_PrepforViewsSectorUpdates sector codes withappropriate code for thetable type. Area sector codesbased on SCC

pAll_PrepforViewsDatasource Updates the datasource fieldbased on various criteria

pAll_PrepforViewsETVcalls pETV function

Updates the emission_ton_value fieldwith the results of the pETV funcion

pETV function:select conversion_factor_amt into nConvFactorfrom edms_ref.units bwhere b.meas_code = 'MASS' and b.active = 'Y' and b.unit_of_measure = p_InEmissionUnit; nETV := p_InEmission * nConvFactor/2000; return nETV

pAll_PrepforViewsETPUpdates the emission_type period fieldbased on the value of the emission_typefield

End pAll_masterprepforviews

Figure A-7. Automated Data Submittal Process (continued).A-29

Select A.O.I /Inventory /Report type

Select Reporttype

Tabular report onScreen

Retrieve Datafrom

SV_RPT_GIS1

On Screen

Choose Output

GIS/Dynamic

Send to VB moduleclsReports.cls

HTML Tablulardata reportMap Display

Select which of the12 standard

reports

Standard Reports

Call specificASP page

as per reportnumber i.e.

app_main_standard_report_SR1.asp

Select A.O.I /Inventory /Report type

Retrieve Datafrom specificsaved report

table i.e.SV_RPT_SR1

Send to VB moduleclsReports.cls

Tabular report onScreenOn Screen

Choose OutputHTML Tablular

data reportGraphical Display

Report Generation

Figure A-8. Report Generation.A-30

Select A.O.I /Inventory /

SCC/NAICS/

SIC/Pollutant

Select Reporttype

Retrieve Data fromSV_RPT_ADHOC_QUERY_

POINT

Check datavolume

Ad-Hoc

Run Queryvia

app_body_ad_hoc_query.aspand

clsAdhoc_new.cls

Small volumesubmit to

app_body_ad_hoc_reports.asp

Large VolumeSubmit to

Schedule_Adhoc_Modelling_PRD.exe

Modeling

Select A.O.I /Inventory /

Sector/Pollutant

Retrieve Data from savedreport table

SV_RPT_ADHOC_QUERY_POINT

Send to VB moduleclsModeling.cls

Choose reporttype

Retrieve Data fromSV_RPT_ADHOC_QUERY_

POINT

Large VolumeSubmit to

Schedule_Adhoc_Modelling_PRD.exe

NIF Export

Data to bedownloaded

by user

Data to bedownloaded

by user

NIFformattedData to be

downloadedby user

Large VolumeSubmit to

Schedule_Adhoc_Modelling_PRD.exe

Data to bedownloaded

by user

Ad-hoc and Modeling Reports

Figure A-8. Report GenerationA-31