educause 2017: course and campus collaboration made cohesive

28
Dr. Lance Ford Eric Loepp, Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Political Science, University of Wisconsin-Whitewater Brad Russell, Director of Information Technology, Mid-State Technical College Course and Campus Collaboration Made Cohesive Lea Ann Turner, Instructional Technology & Virtual Learning Specialist, Mid-State Technical College Nicole Weber, Ph.D., Director of Learning Technology, University of Wisconsin-Whitewater

Upload: cisco

Post on 21-Jan-2018

261 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: EDUCAUSE 2017: Course and Campus Collaboration Made Cohesive

Dr. Lance Ford

Eric Loepp, Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Political Science, University of Wisconsin-Whitewater

Brad Russell, Director of Information Technology, Mid-State Technical College

Course and Campus Collaboration Made Cohesive

Lea Ann Turner, Instructional Technology & Virtual Learning Specialist, Mid-State Technical College

Nicole Weber, Ph.D., Director of Learning Technology, University of Wisconsin-Whitewater

Page 2: EDUCAUSE 2017: Course and Campus Collaboration Made Cohesive

Mid-State’s Connected Experience

“Life often gets in the way of students

returning to class”

Page 3: EDUCAUSE 2017: Course and Campus Collaboration Made Cohesive

Who is Mid-State Technical College?

Small 2 Year Technical College in Central Wisconsin

Approximately 1700 FTE in over 40 programs ranging from Urban Forestry to Business Management

Large Non-Traditional Student Population with Varying Technical Abilities

Page 4: EDUCAUSE 2017: Course and Campus Collaboration Made Cohesive

Our Journey to the Connected Experience through

The Educational Master Plan

The Right Programs

The Right Curriculum

The Right Format

(delivery mode)

The Right Locations

The Right Time

Page 5: EDUCAUSE 2017: Course and Campus Collaboration Made Cohesive

Education Outcomes:

Driving Technology

F U T U R E P A S T

Traditional IT:

Driving Technology

Applications

Services Platform

Infrastructure, Security and Mobility

What is the Connected Experience?

Page 6: EDUCAUSE 2017: Course and Campus Collaboration Made Cohesive

Applications

Services Platform

Infrastructure, Security, Mobility

FY ’18 Technology Capital Budget Comparison

$0.00

$200,000.00

$400,000.00

$600,000.00

$800,000.00

$1,000,000.00

$1,200,000.00

Yearly Breakdown MSTC FY'18 Budget

Infrasructure, Security, and Mobility Services Platform Applications

Page 7: EDUCAUSE 2017: Course and Campus Collaboration Made Cohesive

FY 2018-2022 Technology Capital Budget Comparison

Applications

Services Platform

Infrastructure, Security, Mobility

$0.00

$1,000,000.00

$2,000,000.00

$3,000,000.00

$4,000,000.00

$5,000,000.00

$6,000,000.00

Connected Experience 5-Year capital Budget

Infrasructure, Security, and Mobility Services Platform Applications

Page 8: EDUCAUSE 2017: Course and Campus Collaboration Made Cohesive
Page 9: EDUCAUSE 2017: Course and Campus Collaboration Made Cohesive

Teaching and Learning with

Cisco Spark

Page 10: EDUCAUSE 2017: Course and Campus Collaboration Made Cohesive

Nicole Weber, PhDDirector of Learning Technology

Eric Loepp, PhDAssistant Professor, Political Science

Page 11: EDUCAUSE 2017: Course and Campus Collaboration Made Cohesive

• More than 12,000 students

• Over 1,500 courses

• 52 undergraduate majors and 14 graduate programs

• 1,300 faculty and staff

• Guided by the Wisconsin Idea

Page 12: EDUCAUSE 2017: Course and Campus Collaboration Made Cohesive

ABOUT OUR SPARK PROJECT

Page 13: EDUCAUSE 2017: Course and Campus Collaboration Made Cohesive

Why Cisco Spark?

Key Questions

• How can Spark assist instructors in their teaching?

• How can Spark assist students in their learning?

Spark Board

Wireless Sharing

Electronic Whiteboard

Web Conferencing

Spark Space

Interaction

Communication

Collaboration

Page 14: EDUCAUSE 2017: Course and Campus Collaboration Made Cohesive

Exploring Technology

•Sessions with Dr. Ford (July 2017)

•Internal Session (August 2017)

•Use in in Fall 2017 courses

•Instructor/student data collection (December 2017)

•Campus-Wide Call (April 2017)

•Instructor Support Survey Data

•Spark Selection (March 2017)

Data-Driven Tool Selection

Instructor Recruitment

Instructional Development

Implementation and Evaluation

Page 15: EDUCAUSE 2017: Course and Campus Collaboration Made Cohesive

What We’re Seeing

• It is relatively intuitive for students to use

• Students like adding profile pictures, making it easier to instructors to learn names and faces

• Instructors feel that it enables quicker communication with students

• It supports collaboration for small group work

Page 16: EDUCAUSE 2017: Course and Campus Collaboration Made Cohesive

THE INSTRUCTOR PERSPECTIVE

Page 17: EDUCAUSE 2017: Course and Campus Collaboration Made Cohesive

Why Spark?

• I had no prior experience with Spark

• Summer professional development sessions on campus allowed us to play with the technology

• Support team has been very helpful and responsive

Page 18: EDUCAUSE 2017: Course and Campus Collaboration Made Cohesive

Why Spark? (Con’d)

• New technology is intriguing

– Can make life easier (after learning curve!)

– It is accelerating (limit resistance!)

– Students use it in personal and social life; why not in professional life?

• UW-W is a rural campus

– Commuters

– Working students

Page 19: EDUCAUSE 2017: Course and Campus Collaboration Made Cohesive

Why Spark? (Con’d)

• Extra-curricular skill development

• Colleges/universities promote critical, analytical, knowledge skills

– Increasingly, technological fluency is an imperative rather than a bonus

Page 20: EDUCAUSE 2017: Course and Campus Collaboration Made Cohesive

Personalized Learning Units

Page 21: EDUCAUSE 2017: Course and Campus Collaboration Made Cohesive

Conversations “Unlost”

Page 22: EDUCAUSE 2017: Course and Campus Collaboration Made Cohesive

Individual Consultations

Page 23: EDUCAUSE 2017: Course and Campus Collaboration Made Cohesive

Course Questions

Page 24: EDUCAUSE 2017: Course and Campus Collaboration Made Cohesive

Informal Chatter

Page 25: EDUCAUSE 2017: Course and Campus Collaboration Made Cohesive

Informal Chatter (Con’d)

Page 26: EDUCAUSE 2017: Course and Campus Collaboration Made Cohesive

Assignment Engagement

Page 27: EDUCAUSE 2017: Course and Campus Collaboration Made Cohesive

Classroom Back-Up

Page 28: EDUCAUSE 2017: Course and Campus Collaboration Made Cohesive