efc topic 4.3 benchmarking : comparisons, analysis, and validation

21
Topic 4: Engine, Flow, & Combustion 1 April 5, 2014 ECN 3.0 EFC Topic 4.3 Benchmarking: comparisons, analysis, and validation Objectives Topic 4.3 Exposition of methods & metrics being used to assess simulation equivalency & efficacy of measured flow & combustion Define ECN 3.X Topics, 2014- 2015 - Identify what is needed. - Identify action.

Upload: pelham

Post on 23-Feb-2016

39 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

EFC Topic 4.3 Benchmarking : comparisons, analysis, and validation . Objectives Topic 4.3 Exposition of methods & metrics being used to assess simulation equivalency & efficacy of measured flow & combustion. Define ECN 3.X Topics, 2014-2015 - Identify what is needed. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: EFC Topic 4.3  Benchmarking :  comparisons,   analysis,   and  validation

Topic 4: Engine, Flow, & Combustion

1April 5, 2014

ECN 3.0EFC Topic 4.3 Benchmarking:

comparisons, analysis, and validation

Objectives Topic 4.3

Exposition of methods & metricsbeing used to assess

simulation equivalency & efficacy ofmeasured flow & combustion

Define ECN 3.X Topics, 2014-2015- Identify what is needed.- Identify action.

Page 2: EFC Topic 4.3  Benchmarking :  comparisons,   analysis,   and  validation

Topic 4: Engine, Flow, & Combustion

2April 5, 2014

ECN 3.0EFC Topic 4.3 Benchmarking: comparisons, analysis, and validation

Presented by Dave Reuss

Sources of contributions to EFC:

Tech. Univ. Darmstadt; Brian Peterson, [email protected]

IFP Energie Nouvelles; Cecile Pera, [email protected]

Penn. State Univ; Dan Haworth, [email protected]

Univ. Michigan; David Reuss, [email protected], Volker Sick, [email protected]

Politecnico di Milano;Tommaso Lucchini, [email protected]

Univ. Duisburg-Essen; Sebastian Kaiser, [email protected]

General Motors R&D; Xiaofeng Yang, [email protected], Tang-Wei Kuo, [email protected]

Page 3: EFC Topic 4.3  Benchmarking :  comparisons,   analysis,   and  validation

Topic 4: Engine, Flow, & Combustion

3April 5, 2014

ECN 3.0

4.3.1. Global engine operating conditions

4.3.2. In-cylinder flow characterization

4.3.3. Simulated to measured combustion modeling validation

4.3. Benchmarking: comparisons, analysis, and validation

ECN 3.X 2014-2015 Efforts: Interdependency requires parallel efforts.

Rational flow CCV metrics require knowledge of what flow parameters best correlate with fuel-mixing and combustion CCV

Ultimately, all detailed (small time and space scale) simulation quantities must predict volume-average/global measure (work and engine-out emissions)

Page 4: EFC Topic 4.3  Benchmarking :  comparisons,   analysis,   and  validation

Topic 4: Engine, Flow, & Combustion

4April 5, 2014

ECN 3.0

4.3.1. Global Engine Metrics

Page 5: EFC Topic 4.3  Benchmarking :  comparisons,   analysis,   and  validation

Topic 4: Engine, Flow, & Combustion

5April 5, 2014

ECN 3.04.3.1. Global engine operating conditions

4.3.1.1. In-cylinder 0-D & Global Metrics

TCC-III

P_cyl Pegging

ECN 3.X Topic option:Document

precision & accuracy formechanical & pressure

test-to-test & CCV.

Location Peak Pressure

Page 6: EFC Topic 4.3  Benchmarking :  comparisons,   analysis,   and  validation

Topic 4: Engine, Flow, & Combustion

6April 5, 2014

ECN 3.04.3.1. Global engine operating conditions

4.3.1.1. In-cylinder 0-D & Global Metrics

ECN 3.X Topic option:- Identify useful volume- & plane-averaged metrics.- Quantify flow metrics & values for simulation effectiveness.

KE @

Fie

ld o

f Vie

w

TCC

Milano

Page 7: EFC Topic 4.3  Benchmarking :  comparisons,   analysis,   and  validation

Topic 4: Engine, Flow, & Combustion

7April 5, 2014

ECN 3.04.3.1.2. Intake & Exhaust Systems 1-D quantities

ECN 3.X Topic options:- Quantify effect of P_Intk_Port CCV on trapped mass & flow.- Quantify simulation noise precision and accuracy.

TCC-III

PIntakePort Discrepancy,

(simulation – measurement)

CoV,

%

Disc

repa

ncy,

%

Measurement Noise

LES CCV

Page 8: EFC Topic 4.3  Benchmarking :  comparisons,   analysis,   and  validation

Topic 4: Engine, Flow, & Combustion

8April 5, 2014

ECN 3.0

ECN 3.X Topic options:- Quantify impact of intake-port

1-D pressure & 3-D velocityon in-cylinder CCV.

4.3.1. Global engine operating conditions4.3.1.2. Intake & Exhaust Systems 1-D quantities

INTAKE

Inta

ke p

ipe

velo

city

[m/s

]

SGEmac

-200 CAD

LES: 25 cycles

PIV: 200 cycles

Trap

ped

Mas

s

Mean Pintake

Page 9: EFC Topic 4.3  Benchmarking :  comparisons,   analysis,   and  validation

Topic 4: Engine, Flow, & Combustion

9April 5, 2014

ECN 3.0

4.3.2. In-cylinder flow characterization

Page 10: EFC Topic 4.3  Benchmarking :  comparisons,   analysis,   and  validation

Topic 4: Engine, Flow, & Combustion

10April 5, 2014

ECN 3.0

SGEmac

ECN 3.X Topic option:Identify methods and metrics to quantitatively assess equivalency of simulated & measured velocity and momentum dissipation.

4.3.2. Simulated-to-Measured Flow characterization4.3.2.1. Statistical Methods

SIDI TUD

PDF

𝝏𝒖  /𝝏 𝒙

next step

Resolution dependence

Model dependences

Page 11: EFC Topic 4.3  Benchmarking :  comparisons,   analysis,   and  validation

Topic 4: Engine, Flow, & Combustion

11April 5, 2014

ECN 3.04.3.2. Simulated-to-Measured Flow characterization

4.3.2.1. Statistical Methods4.3.2.1.1. phase-average and standard deviation

SIDI TUD

Measured Ens. AveLES Ens. Ave. Ens,. Std. Dev.

Ensemble Average & Standard Deviation (CCV) of PIV & LES velocity are equivalent metrics.

ECN 3.X Topic option:Identify rational measurements to

characterize RANS “turbulence”

TCC, RANS

Page 12: EFC Topic 4.3  Benchmarking :  comparisons,   analysis,   and  validation

Topic 4: Engine, Flow, & Combustion

12April 5, 2014

ECN 3.0

Max velocity

Velocity noise

4.3.2. Simulated-to-Measured Flow characterization4.3.2.1. Statistical Methods

4.3.2.1.2. CCV vs. turbulence vs. noise

ECN 3.X Topic option:- Standards exist to quantify measurement noise. - How are simulation noise & uncertainty quantified?

PIV dynamic range

PIV interrogation % first choices

PIV interrogation quality

Crankangle

Simulation Noise

?

Page 13: EFC Topic 4.3  Benchmarking :  comparisons,   analysis,   and  validation

Topic 4: Engine, Flow, & Combustion

13April 5, 2014

ECN 3.04.3.2. Simulated-to-Measured Flow characterization

4.3.2.2. Proper Orthogonal Decomposition,

Snapshots sampled @ one CA, all cycles

POD creates multi-dimensional “empirical” basis functions.

Modes created based on flow

- high KE (V2, or I2)

- and/or repeatable.

Phase-dependent POD

Mode 1 mid intake stroke

- Eigen values capture KE.

- Can be used for CCV of Modes

cycle #

KE,

m2 /

s2

TCC- I

Page 14: EFC Topic 4.3  Benchmarking :  comparisons,   analysis,   and  validation

Topic 4: Engine, Flow, & Combustion

14April 5, 2014

ECN 3.0

TCC

4.3.2.2. Proper Orthogonal Decomposition,

Velocity snapshots 1. sampled @ all CA, all cycles2. mapped to single grid 3. normalized to KE of individual snapshot

POD creates single set of modes applicable to• all CA, • all cycles.

Normalized KE creates modes based on• normalized velocity and• intra-cycle persistence (cycle similarity)

Phase-invariant POD

Eigenvalue captures intra-cycle variability flow similarity

CCV

crank angle

Coeffi

cien

ts

Mode 2

Mode 1

Page 15: EFC Topic 4.3  Benchmarking :  comparisons,   analysis,   and  validation

Topic 4: Engine, Flow, & Combustion

15April 5, 2014

ECN 3.04.3.2. Simulated-to-Measured Flow characterization

ECN 3.X Topic option:POD is not universally or extensively used as a metric. Identify acceptable methods and standards of POD application.

Combine Measured & LES snapshots + Phase-invariant POD single set of POD Modes.

crank angle

Coeffi

cien

ts

LESPIV

Coefficients provide metric for direct comparison of measured vs simulated Intra-cycle and Inter-cycle equivalence.

Page 16: EFC Topic 4.3  Benchmarking :  comparisons,   analysis,   and  validation

Topic 4: Engine, Flow, & Combustion

16April 5, 2014

ECN 3.04.3.2. Simulated-to-Measured Flow characterization

4.3.2.8. Simulation efficacy of scalar mixing.

ECN 3.X Topic option:

Efficacy of simulations onone- & two-phase mixing,

especially sub-grid.

End ofhydrogen injection

Experiment Simulation

H2 mole

fraction

H2ICE

Page 17: EFC Topic 4.3  Benchmarking :  comparisons,   analysis,   and  validation

Topic 4: Engine, Flow, & Combustion

17April 5, 2014

ECN 3.0

4.3.3. Combustion-Modeling validation

Page 18: EFC Topic 4.3  Benchmarking :  comparisons,   analysis,   and  validation

Topic 4: Engine, Flow, & Combustion

18April 5, 2014

ECN 3.0

ECN 3.X Topic option:- Create defined methods for computing work (IMEP) and

Apparent Heat Release, AHR.- Establish standard of accepted equivalence between

measured and simulated AHR.

4.3.3. Combustion modeling validation4.3.3.1. Global heat release

SGEmac

I

Page 19: EFC Topic 4.3  Benchmarking :  comparisons,   analysis,   and  validation

Topic 4: Engine, Flow, & Combustion

19April 5, 2014

ECN 3.04.3.2. Combustion modeling validation

4.3.3.2. Ignition and early flame development.

PDF of burned gas

3-D projection

OH PLIF, probability of flame

Chemiluminescence,Single cycle

SGEmac

Single-cycleMie-scattering PDF of burn-gas

SIDI TUD

PDF of burned gas2-D plane

Page 20: EFC Topic 4.3  Benchmarking :  comparisons,   analysis,   and  validation

Topic 4: Engine, Flow, & Combustion

20April 5, 2014

ECN 3.04.3.2. Combustion modeling validation

4.3.3.2. Ignition and early flame development.

ECN 3.X Topic option:Identify optical metrics applicable to both measured & simulated data to define equivalency during early burning ( burned mass fraction < 20%).

0.20

0.15

0.10

0.05

0.00-5 0 5 10 15

ST (m/s)

PDF

(ST)

SIDI TUD

Page 21: EFC Topic 4.3  Benchmarking :  comparisons,   analysis,   and  validation

Topic 4: Engine, Flow, & Combustion

21April 5, 2014

ECN 3.0

ECN 3.X Topic option:What is needed?What experiments are possible ?

4.3.2. Combustion modeling validation4.3.3.2. Fully Developed turbulent flame

Turbulent-combustion of late-burned mass Compressed scales

Dissipation

Near-wall

Poor optical access (esp. SC SIDI with a bowl)