ei storage presentation
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
Electricity StorageWindfarm and Industrial Applications
L. Staudt, Centre for Renewable Energy
Dundalk Institute of Technology
Presentation Summary
Technology overview
Windfarm application
Industrial application
Conclusions
Technology Overview
Technology Overview
Technology Overview
Technology Overview
Technology Overview
Economics
Profit per transaction (P)
value of sales must exceed value of purchases
Number of transactions per year (n)
As many as possible!
Good business: when product of both is
maximized (P x n = max)
Technology Overview
Technology Overview
Why flow and NaS batteries (for windfarm and industrial applications)?
Flow batteries (and NaS) provide high power andhigh energy
You can easily and independently select both power and energy, as the products are modular
They have no special site requirements
Will first discuss flow batteries, then NaS
Technology Overview
A flow battery is an electrochemical electricity storage device, somewhere between a standard rechargeable battery and a fuel cell
The energy is stored (only) in the electrolytes, which can be fully discharged and recharged
Power and energy are independent
More power: add flow cells
More energy: add electrolyte
Technology Overview
Basic flow battery schematic
Technology Overview
Technology Overview
Moab, Utah
250kW 8 hour installation
Technology Overview
Technology Overview
Moab, Utah
Tomamae windfarm, Japan4MW, 1.5 hour flow battery installation
Technology Overview
RISO 15kW, 8-hour flow battery
Technology Overview
Advantages of flow
battery technology
Flexible location
Good energy density
Independent energy and
power sizing
Thousands of deep
charge/discharge cycles
(long lifetime)
Operate at ambient
temperatures
Acceptable cycle
efficiency
Mass market should lead
to lower costs
Quiet operation
Technology Overview
Flow battery concerns
Cost
Proven reliability
Proven efficiency
Technology not mature –
may have “surprises”
Maintaining electrolyte
purity (appears OK)
Current density can be
improved
Environmental issues
(appears OK)
Needs a building
Business stability (early
days)
Technology Overview
Technology Overview
NGK Sodium Sulphur battery
(not a flow battery)
Technology Overview
NGK NaS battery
Technology Overview (NaS)
NaS vs. flow battery
Longer commercial history
Cycle life depends on DOD
Better energy density
No building required
Higher efficiency
Lower cost?
Technology Overview
Vanadium
Redox (VRB)
Zinc Bromine
(ZBB)
Cerium Zinc
(Plurion)
NaS (NGK)
Efficiency 65-75% 60-70% 70-80% 75-85%
Lifetime >10,000 cycles >1500 cycles >15,000 cycles ~5000 cycles
Cost
4-hour system
8-hour system
(w/o building)
€1800/kW
€2600/kW
(w/o building)
€1800/kW
€2600/kW
(w/o building)
€1800/kW
€2600/kW
€1400/kW
€2400/kW
O&M cost 0.5% of Capex 0.5% of Capex 0.5% of Capex 0.25% of Capex
Wind projects Kings Island
200kW/800kWh
Tomamae
4MW/6MWh
n/a n/a Hachijo Island
400kW/3MWh,
many non-wind
Presentation Summary
Technology overview
Windfarm application
Industrial application
Conclusions
We created a model that optimally dispatched storage at a 12MW windfarm in the UK (using real UK market prices and windfarm output)
Our model determined maximum revenue over the course of a year (purchase cost less sales cost for each half hour)
Usually resulted in full charge/discharge each day, but may not e.g. if efficiency is low and price spread is low
Windfarm application
A number of cases run for different sizes (MW and MWh) and different efficiencies
Base case: 5MW/20MWh with 75% efficiency
Gives an optimistic result, due to optimal operation Selectable battery cost: €X per MW plus €Y per MWh (base case of €1m per MW and €200k per MWh)
Adjustable O&M cost (base case of 0.5% of Capex)
Windfarm application
Windfarm application
Effect of battery energy rating for a 5MW battery system on a 12 MW windfarm
Windfarm application
Effect of battery power rating for a 20MWh battery system on a 12 MW windfarm
Base case efficiency and prices achieve a minimum payback period of 35 years
Efficiency is very important – 60% to 80% efficiency gives a 31 to 54 year payback
Halving battery costs gives minimum payback of 17 years for base case
Further benefit possible by considering balancing penalties and ancillary services value
Windfarm application
Conclusions (windfarm application)
Battery costs must decrease substantially
Factors that will improve economics:
Mass production
Improved efficiency
Electricity market price spread
Value given to ancillary services
Technological breakthroughs
Windfarm application
Presentation Summary
Technology and Application overview
Windfarm application
Industrial application
Conclusions
In 2005 we installed a large scale commercial
wind turbine on the Dundalk IT campus
It operates as an autoproducer which results in
the reduction in electricity bills
Excess electricity generated is exported to grid
Electricity deficit is imported from grid
Now Dundalk IT is installing a flow battery for
primarily research purposes but will also further
reduce annual electricity bills
Dundalk IT storage project
The Campus Wind Turbine at Dundalk Institute of Technology
Dundalk IT storage project
PCS/Battery
To other DkIT
transformers
(10kV/400V)
Grid (10kV 3 phase) Wind Turbine
690V/10kV
10kV 3Phase690V 3Phase
Transformer in base of turbine
10kV/400V
To DkIT Loads
400V 3 phase
On site transformer
Circuit
Breakers
& MeteringSCADA PC
Incomer Meter
(Grid)
Wind Turbine Meter
DkIT HV switchroom
Dundalk IT storage project
Monthly Data
0
50000
100000
150000
200000
250000
300000
350000
400000
450000
Jan
Feb Mar A
prM
ay
June
July
Aug
Sep Oct
Nov
Dec
Month
kW
h
DkIT consumption with no WTG
WTG Production
Monthly DkIT energy production and consumption
Dundalk IT storage project
Monthly Electricty Demand vs Wind Turbine Production (No Storage)
0
50000
100000
150000
200000
250000
300000
350000
400000
450000
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
June
July
Aug
Sep O
ctNov
Dec
Month
kWh DkIT consumption with no WTG
Total WTG Production
DkIT consumption with WTG
WTG Exported Energy
Dundalk IT storage project
Following a successful application to Enterprise Ireland
for a Capital Equipment grant, Dundalk IT tendered for a
125kW, 500kWh flow battery – September 2008
Tender awarded to ZBB (USA) – end of 2008
Battery system manufactured and tested – February to
May 2009
Battery acceptance testing – June 2009
Shipped to Dundalk IT – August 2009
Installation preparation underway at DkIT
Dundalk IT storage project
Dundalk IT storage project
Dundalk IT storage project
50kWh 50kWh 50kWh 50kWh 50kWh
50kWh 50kWh 50kWh 50kWh 50kWh
PC
S
AC
DC
Sea box container
Chiller Unit
Cell
stacks
Dundalk IT storage project
Power conditioning
system during FAT
Dundalk IT storage project
Control
system
display
Dundalk IT storage project
Battery
foundation
Dundalk IT storage project
Battery
foundation
Dundalk IT storage project
Economics depend on a number of factors
including:
Electricity tariffs
Battery capital costs
Battery efficiency
Value given to potential utilization of waste heat
Dundalk IT storage project
A model was developed by DkIT to evaluate the addition of electricity to the wind turbine
It takes half hourly power production and consumption data and MIC for a year and then calculates the annual savings for a given battery rating (kW), capacity (kWh) and efficiency using given electricity tariffs
Option to give value to waste heat is included
Dundalk IT storage project
Dundalk IT storage project
Various model outcomes Battery capital cost €575,000
Battery efficiency 65%
Dundalk IT storage project
Some Scenarios Value given to exports (€/kWh)
Value given to waste heat (€/kWh)
Total DkIT Annual Costs (€)
Annual savings due to battery (€)
No storage NA N/A 330,025 N/A
125kW, 500kWh 0.00 0.00 322,156 7,488
125kW, 500kWh 0.057 0.00 290,620 3,597
125kW, 500kWh 0.00 0.04 318,622 11,022
125kW, 500kWh 0.057 0.04 287,086 7,131
As wind autoproducers operate differently to
conventional power generators no value is available at
present for:
Operating Reserve
Reactive Power Generation
Black Start
Capacity
Dundalk IT storage project
Conclusions (industrial application) Battery storage in commercial industrial wind
autoproduction applications difficult to justify economically at present
Significant reduction in system costs in mass production coupled with increasing electricity prices should make these systems viable with wind autoproduction in the medium term
Dundalk IT storage project
However, it is a research project..
The flow battery facility at DkIT will allow:
Development and test of control
(charge/discharge) algorithms so that the
operation of system will maximise economic return
This will incorporate a number of factors including,
electricity prices, wind and load forecasting
Practical experience and assessment of actual
performance of this technology
Dundalk IT storage project
Presentation Summary
Technology and Application overview
Windfarm application
Industrial application
Conclusions
Electricity storage has a bright future
Storage will be ubiquitous in electricity grids, becoming “The Fourth Element”
There are presently a number of immature but promising storage technology
The technology is not yet generally economic in windfarm and industrial applications
Economics will improve with mass production, and with value being given to ancillary services
Overall conclusions
Questions?