elective public management – week 8 hr in the public sector

9
Building Competence. Crossing Borders. Elective Public Management – Week 8 HR in the Public Sector Prof. Dr. Andreas Bergmann Institute of Public Management [email protected]

Upload: sumi

Post on 05-Jan-2016

37 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Elective Public Management – Week 8 HR in the Public Sector. Prof. Dr. Andreas Bergmann Institute of Public Management [email protected]. Civil servants vs. Employees. Civil servants Tenured status In Germany for lifetime - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Elective Public Management – Week 8 HR in the Public Sector

Building Competence. Crossing Borders.

Elective Public Management – Week 8

HR in the Public Sector

Prof. Dr. Andreas Bergmann

Institute of Public Management

[email protected]

Page 2: Elective Public Management – Week 8 HR in the Public Sector

8.ppt, fs09 2

Civil servants vs. Employees

Civil servants

Tenured status

• In Germany for lifetime

• Elsewhere typically for a few years (e.g. 4 to 6; almost guaranteed renewal)

High levels of values: Integrity, political impartiality, merit, loyalty, devotion to public service

Not contracted but elected, as consequence no normal termination of contract

In some countries separate pension schemes

Page 3: Elective Public Management – Week 8 HR in the Public Sector

8.ppt, fs09 3

Civil servants vs. Employees

Employees

Contract or other forms of consensus mechanism

Loyalty limited to contractual obligations

Discontinuation possible, by both parties

Normal fringe benefits, similar to private sector

Page 4: Elective Public Management – Week 8 HR in the Public Sector

8.ppt, fs09 4

Civil servants vs. Employees

Under NPM

Many countries change from (special status) civil servants to employees, in order to

• Increase flexibility

• Save cost

• Introduce performance management systems

„Hybridisation“

Page 5: Elective Public Management – Week 8 HR in the Public Sector

8.ppt, fs09 5

Civil servants vs. Employees

Under NPM

Switzerland: Cantons abolish special status in 1990s, federal government in 2001

• Also for current civil servants

• Facilitated through identical pension system for employees and both sectors

• Free movement between sectors

Page 6: Elective Public Management – Week 8 HR in the Public Sector

8.ppt, fs09 6

Civil servants vs. Employees

Under NPM

In Germany:

• Number of employees increased, now about 2/3

• But civil servant status maintained

- Separate pension schemes as main obstacle

• Retention of civil service status

- puts strong limitations on any form of Performance Management and any organizational change

- Inhibits any change of employment/sector of employment

Page 7: Elective Public Management – Week 8 HR in the Public Sector

8.ppt, fs09 7

Civil servants vs. Employees

German pension system for civil servants

Only for civil servants, not for employees!

Pensions are „pay-as-you-go“, i.e. salary is paid (at reduced level, about 72 percent) even after retirement

Pensions are funded same as salaries, i.e. from government budget

Entitlement is based on last gross salary

Page 8: Elective Public Management – Week 8 HR in the Public Sector

8.ppt, fs09 8

Civil servants vs. Employees

German pension system for civil servants

Large number of entitled civil

servants to increase

Supplementary pension scheme

(funded) only recently started

Page 9: Elective Public Management – Week 8 HR in the Public Sector

8.ppt, fs09 9

References

EMERY, Y./GIAUQUE, D.: Employment in the public and private sectors: toward a confusing hybridization process. In: International Review of Public Administration, Vol. 71, 2005, 639-657.

KUHLMANN, S./RÖBER, M.: Civil Service in Germany: Characteristics of Public Employment and Modernization of Public Personnel Management. Paper presented at the meeting Modernization of State and Administration in Europe: A France-Germany Comparison, 14-15 May 2004, Bordeaux, Goethe-Institut.

OECD: Economic Survey of Germany. 2004.

WILSON, R.: Portrait of a profession revisited. In: Public Administration, Vol. 81, 2003, 365-378.