electrical brain activity following magnetic stimulation as recorded with high-resolution q eeg
DESCRIPTION
Electrical brain activity following magnetic stimulation as recorded with high-resolution Q EEG. www.biomag-hus.fi/tms. rTMS. First TMS capable of delivering a pulse every three seconds (as diagnostic aids for neurologists.) New machines which can give up to 50 stimuli per second (rTMS) - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Electrical brain Electrical brain activity following activity following
magnetic magnetic stimulation as stimulation as recorded with recorded with
high-resolution high-resolution QQEEGEEG
www.biomag-hus.fi/tmswww.biomag-hus.fi/tms
rTMSrTMS
First TMS capable of delivering a pulse every three seconds (as diagnostic aids for neurologists.)
New machines which can give up to 50 stimuli per second (rTMS)
A non-invasive technique, free of serious side effects, easily modifying activity of specific brain areas
rTMS gives short pulses of magnetic energy to Limbic system structures
How How does does rTMS rTMS wwork for brain electrical ork for brain electrical activity?activity?
Small electric charges can cause the neurons to fire or to become active
How How does does rTMS rTMS wwork for brain electrical activity?ork for brain electrical activity?
Ilmoniemi et.al.(1997) Ilmoniemi et.al.(1997) were able towere able to measuremeasure with with QQEEG just seconds after EEG just seconds after
electromagnetic pulseelectromagnetic pulse
Nashaat et.al (2001),Nikulin et.al (2003), Kommsi et.al (2004)
have used ongoing rTMS and QEEG Monitoring
Brain electrical activity changes Brain electrical activity changes with rTMSwith rTMS
Acute rTMS induces changes in regional activity throughout the brain
Stimulation intensity is important Low frequency has a tendency to
decrease High frequency has a tendency to
increase
Resynchronization effectsResynchronization effects
Normal brain function requires synchronized activity of interconnected brain areas
rTMS may help ‘reset’ the normal synchrony between brain regions
(Garcia-Toro et.al. 2001, Avery 2004)
GABA and QEEGGABA and QEEG
GABA increases functional connectivity on QEEG (Benzodiazepine effect)
GABA decreases with stressGABA decreases in plasma and in brain
(MRS) of depressed patientsECT increases GABA level in depressed
patients.rTMS: increase ?
State marker improves after treatment
Trait marker doesn’t improve after treatment
‘‘State markerState markers’s’ of of QEEG beingQEEG being::
Ratio of Alpha waves Ratio of Delta wavesHemispheric asymmetryAlpha/Delta ratio of the frontal area
Acute drug effect in QEEGAcute drug effect in QEEG
Tricyclic Antidepressant drugs: Alpha, Theta, Delta
Antipsychotic drugs :Theta and Delta wavesAntianxiety drugs :betaCognitive activator drugs : Alpha SSRI drugs: Alpha (Itil 1989)
The Response The Response to drug tto drug treatment in reatment in depressiondepression
• Delta waves: good response,
• Alpha and Beta waves: good response,
• Unchanged QEEG: bad response.
(Kendler)
The Distribution of Brain waves in The Distribution of Brain waves in QEEG QEEG after 10 sessionafter 10 sessions ofs of rTMS rTMS
(preliminary findings)(preliminary findings)
After Treatment After Treatment Frequency RateFrequency Rate NN %%
Delta / AlDelta / Alphpha Rata Ratee
A . Delta increaseA . Delta increase 6767 46.246.2
B. AlB. Alphpha increasea increase 5757 39.339.3
C. No changeC. No change 2020 13.713.7
D. DifferentD. Different 11 0.60.6
TotalTotal 145145 100100
According to HAM ScoreAccording to HAM Scoress
Improvement rate ofImprovement rate of
The Delta increase The Delta increase group group
N:67N:67
+ + + +
Improvement rate ofImprovement rate of
The Alpha increase The Alpha increase groupgroup
N:57N:57
+ + ++ + +
No changes groupNo changes group
N:20N:20++
HAM ScoresHAM Scores and QEEG and QEEG after 10 sessions of rTMS after 10 sessions of rTMS
“An i“An interpretationnterpretation””All patients All patients showed showed 30- 30-550% treatment 0% treatment
responseresponse In In AlAlphpha increases groupa increases group,, HAM HAM
improvementimprovement was was greatergreater In nIn no changes o changes group, group, HAM improvement HAM improvement
was minimalwas minimalMore verification, and MEG studies,More verification, and MEG studies,
are necessary are necessary
PregnancyPregnancy and rTMS and rTMS Case Study (I) Case Study (I)
One case (I.D., 32 yOne case (I.D., 32 yearsears))She She hadhad serious serious non-psychotic non-psychotic Chronic Chronic
Major DepressionMajor Depression..She used antiepileptic She used antiepileptic
and antidepressant drugs.and antidepressant drugs.She became pregnant during treatment.She became pregnant during treatment.She wantShe wanted ed to continue to continue the the pregnancy.pregnancy.
Pregnancy Pregnancy and rTMS and rTMS Case Study (II)Case Study (II)
Firstly, we stopped her using the antidepressant drugs
We applied 40 sessions of rTMS to her.Every session was 25 Hz. and 1000 pulses.Now, she has a healthy baby.After birth, rTMS was continued.
FFrequencyrequency of seizures of seizures
We applied rTMS at approximately 15,000 sessions in two years
In every session, rTMS was applied at 25 Hz
In most cases, 1000 pulses were applied in every session
Grandmal seizures were observed only in 3 cases.(3 /15,000)
25 Hz, 1 Pulses, 50% Power25 Hz, 1 Pulses, 50% Power
25 Hz, 1 Pulses, 100% Power25 Hz, 1 Pulses, 100% Power
25 Hz, 3 Pulses, 100% Power25 Hz, 3 Pulses, 100% Power
5 Hz, 10 Pulses, 50% Power, Duration 1.8 sec5 Hz, 10 Pulses, 50% Power, Duration 1.8 sec
5 Hz, 10 Pulses, 75% Power, Duration 1.8 sec5 Hz, 10 Pulses, 75% Power, Duration 1.8 sec
5 Hz, 10 Pulses, 100% Power, Duration 1.8 sec5 Hz, 10 Pulses, 100% Power, Duration 1.8 sec
25 Hz, 50 Pulses, 50% Power, Duration 1.9 sec25 Hz, 50 Pulses, 50% Power, Duration 1.9 sec
25 Hz, 50 Pulses, 75% Power, Duration 1.9 sec25 Hz, 50 Pulses, 75% Power, Duration 1.9 sec
25 Hz, 50 Pulses, 100% Power, Duration 1.9 sec25 Hz, 50 Pulses, 100% Power, Duration 1.9 sec
20
A T
B T
A2A2
A T
21
A T
B T
A3A3
A T
B T
22
A4A4
B T
A T
34
A7A7
42
A T
B T
A9A9
B T
A T
32
B6B6
B T
A T
40
B8B8
49
A T
B9B9
BT
A T
63
B11B11
94
A T
B T
B17B17
A T
B T12
C3C3
B T
A T
61
C4C4
B T
A T
71
C5C5
111B T
A T
C8C8
130B T
A T
C11C11
B T
A T
11
E2E2
36
A T
B T
E6E6
95
A T
B T
E9E9
98
A T
B T
E10E10
116B T
A T
E11E11
Scientific InspirationScientific Inspiration
OneOne day, in 1990 at day, in 1990 at aa London Hospital in London Hospital in an an elevator, a passenger was giggling.elevator, a passenger was giggling. AA magnetic stimulation magnetic stimulation had been applied had been applied toto his head. It his head. It waswas a a neuroneuro--didiaagnostic motor gnostic motor test, for thumb jerktest, for thumb jerk
Dr. Mark George observed anDr. Mark George observed and was d was astonished astonished by by this situation. He suspected this situation. He suspected that magnetic fields could move much morthat magnetic fields could move much moree than the thumb.than the thumb.
The story of magnetic therapy in psychiatry The story of magnetic therapy in psychiatry startedstarted like this like this..