elope5_reader

elope 5Learning Environments

Campus Cologne

v

elope

Learning Environments Campus CologneProject Fall 2012/13

Organized byCologne University of Applied Sciences

LeadBern University of Applied SciencesSchool of Architecture

Imprintelope 5Learning Environments - Campus Cologne

EditorialRené CousinKathrin MerzCorina EbelingKey Portilla Kawamura

CoverRolex Learning Centre, Lausanne, SwitzerlandPhoto: Walter Niedermayr [in: Della Casa Francesco Rolex Learning Centre EPFL Press 2010]

Burgdorf, September 25th 2012_Update October 2nd 2012

Table of Contents

1. Introduction 1

2. The Project elope5 2 2.1 Educational Diversity 2 2.2 Learning Environments - Campus Cologne 3 2.3 Innovation 4 2.4 Partners and Stakeholders 5

3. The Philosophical Background of elope 7 3.1 elope - A learning and Teaching Platform 7 3.2 Responsibilities of elope and its Partners 9 4. The Task 11 4.1 General Setting 11 4.2 The specific Situation in Cologne 11 4.3 Expected Output 13 4.4 Requirements and Expectations 13 4.5 Boundary Conditions of Stakeholders in Planning Process 15 4.6 Basic Background Information 15 5. Structure of the Course 17 5.1 Phases, Goals and Deliverables 17 5.2 Assessment Criteria 21 5.3 Jury 21

6. Kick-Offs and Semester Schedule 23 6.1 Virtual Kick-Off 23 6.2 Inputs during Physical Kick Off 23 6.3 Physical Kick-Off Week in Cologne GER 24 6.4 Semester Schedule 26

7. People 29 7.1 Team elope 29 7.2 Coaches 30 7.3 Partners 32 7.4 Experts Physical Kick Off 33 7.5 Students and Teams 34

Appendices 35 I Basic Date Urban Planning II Basic Data University III Communication & Data Sharing Tools IV Bibliography V Miscellaneous Helpful Information Links Maps

elope5 2012/13 | Learning Environments - Campus Cologne

Bern University of Applied Sciences - Architecture, Wood and Civil Engineering | Cologne University of Applied Sciences

„If you have an apple and I have an apple and we exchange these apples then you and I still each have one apple. But if you have an idea and I have

an idea and we exchange these ideas, then each of us will have two ideas.“

GEORGE BERNARD SHAW

elope 5 Project 2012/13 | Learning Environments - Campus Cologne 1

elope - embedded learing oriented project environment is a learning, research and tea-ching platform which enables and facilitates transdisciplinary, transcultural and virtual deve-lopment processes with the goal to create better mutual understanding in the planning process, to improve the decision making processes, to reduce planning risks and, finally, to achieve better results in a shorter time with lower overall lifecycle costs.

elope is a network of universitiy partners and is formed in an alliance hosted at and coordi-nated by the Bern University of Applied Sciences. elope Projects are acquired and co-organized by the elope alliance Partners on an yearly rotational basis. The project elope 5 is co-organized by the Cologne University of Applied Sciences, Germany.

elope brings together specialists who recognize the need of transdisciplinary and trans-cultural approaches in academic learning and teaching as well as in practice to develop robust solutions for a sustainable development and to create graduates who qualify them-selves by a broad respect for neighbouring disciplines. It brings together faculty members, students, industry partners and further interest groups. elope alliance recognizes that a discourse among the culturally different approaches will foster better solutions for the complex tasks of today’s global society using a sharing attitude and enabling a dialogue about continuous research and development of the working methodologies.

1. Introduction

Bern University of Applied Sciences - Architecture, Wood and Civil Engineering | Cologne University of Applied Sciences2

Compentency Development

Continuing Education & Mentoring

Technology Support

Research

2.1 Educational Diversity

Educational diversity as one of the major goals of the Bologna process is taken into focus at the UAS-Cologne. Students from heterogeneous backgrounds should find the oppor-tunity to learn according to their abilities and strengths, their cultural and intellectual premises. Universities’ Education shall be more differentiated, cooperative, self-organized and problem based. Coaching shall follow the pure class-room lecturing and practical project work shall follow theoretical discourses.For this changing understanding of learning procedure a University Campus also needs a new built environment that is open in many ways. Open to new forms of social interaction, open for creative inspiration, open for changing student constellations, open for neigh-borhoods.Communication space, rooms to experience team-work, laboratories for self organized student and experiments, virtual spaces in a campus network are on demand.

2. The Project elope 5


2.2 Learning Environments - Campus Cologne

The campus of engineering sciences of the UAS-Cologne (Campus Deutz) was built in the early 1970ies and does not fulfill modern requirements as mentioned above. After more than 2 years of political struggle and urban planning to find the right location, it is agreed that the old location shall be also the new one, but with a completely different face. The number of challenges is numerous. Demolition and Construction activities must take place while university life goes on. Existing buildings that are worthwhile to keep shall be inte-grated and various new open spaces are to be created as mentioned before. This is a demanding and complex task for real trans-disciplinary team-work.

In addition to the educational diversity requirements and the intended integration of com-munity life is one of the stakeholders’ strong interests (city of cologne). Minimized energy consumption, strong pollution prevention and waste recycling shall increase the “green” image and impetus that the UAS has started with the EMAS (Eco- Management and Audit Scheme) certification in 2008.

Architecture Model Campus Deutz

Campus Deutzin the 70‘s


Design innovation, which essentially means the definition, development, and creation of new concepts and their successful launch, is the driving factor for a powerful, competitive economy and the prosperity of society. Therefore, the education of professionals at univer-sities and the continuous development of architects, engineers, urban designers, sociolo-gists, etc. in the wide field of design innovation are of central importance to cope with the global challenges to jointly develop and implement sustainable processes. These proces-ses one has to respect efficiency (in the use of limited resources), sufficiency (by reducing the wishes to the necessary), and congruence (by fostering and reinforcing recyclable pro-ducts).

The internationally and multidisciplinary composed teams shall cooperate in a trans-disci-plinary manner to achieve innovation overcoming the limits of each discipline. It is not expected to create completely new products or technical details but create unique con-ceptions that fulfill the demanded purposes in an extraordinary way. Criteria are e.g.

• flexible and multifunctional use• ecologic and economic lifecycle scenarios• creating inspiring atmospheres

A campus needs strong identification by students, staff and the neighborhood to be the expected high value of the community. Innovation shall be encouraged to various aspects:

• learning environment• participation in science• Integration of building technology and scientific laboratories

2.3 Innovation

www.diyda.org Do it yourself - Open Source

promotes interdisciplinary and alternative approaches to design

processes in architecture.

Photograph: Roman Busse


2.4 Partners and Stakeholders

Public Building and Real Estate Management Company BLB

The BLB real estate management company is responsible to supply, manage and maintain public buildings in the county of Northrhine-Westphalia (NRW) adequate to the needs of the different users. This duty includes several buildings used and rented by the Fachhochschule (UAS-Cologne) among others at the campus Deutz.

Together with the executive committee of the Fachhochschule (FH) and their represen-tatives from the teaching staff and student parliament the BLB has elaborated a campus development plan (HSEP) for future learning environments. This plan basis on an analysis of the existing built structure and the goals of the FH.

The BLB has also done a preliminary design study in 2010 for modernization of the existing campus Deutz with respect to the needs at that time and the federal regulations. Because the resulting severe restrictions in continuous use, the extremely long period of construction (at least 12 years), the relatively high costs and the risk of complete loss of attraction for students in the competition among universities, the BLB and the FH executive committee have voted against this plan.

An alternative solution which was estimated the best is a step by step rebuilding of the mayor part of the existing campus. This includes the purchase of new territory next to the campus to build the first new buildings before the existing buildings can be demolished.

In the summer of 2011 the ministry of innovation, science and scientific research (MSWF) of NRW has decided to finance the reconstruction of the campus Deutz in the same location.The first step of the realization procedure is an urban planning competition which started in April 2012 with expected results in Dec 2012. The goal of this competition is to develop an attractive overall campus structure integrating urban planning guidelines of the city of Cologne with focuses on:

• the interaction of campus facilities with activities in the surrounding communities • creation of a unique structure in its neighborhood• an appropriate urban density of buildings• a strong incentive towards an urban upgrade of the areas on the right hand side of the

Rhine river (a structural change was initiated by perishing industries)• improving the deficits of missing urban space bonds (overcome the isolated situation

among strong traffic lines)• create a meaningful crosslinking with the overall urban situation

More details to the stakeholder’s requirements and the urban situation you will find in the annex “basic data”.One of the main goals of the university itself is the creation of flexible, future orientated and inspiring environments that enable fruitful cooperation and communication in various learning-teaching constellations, with multidisciplinary teams, integrating real and virtual learning spaces as well as discussion forums.

Urban Planning Authority of the City of CologneThe Urban Planning Authority of the City of Cologne is responsable for all questions related to urban planning. The office works out the planning-related framwork conditions and for-mulates the objectives and measures for urban and spatial development of the city.

UAS-Department of Construction and Building Management (Unit 10)


Doublehead Viewing Horizon1974

Dieter Roth www.moma.org

„Education is not an arsenal - it is a horizon.“

Hans Blumenberg


Theory & Practice

Learning System

Campus in Mind

Problem Based Learning

3. The Philosophical Background of elope

3.1 elope - A learning and Teaching Platform

Context Nowadays, students are increasingly challenged within their specific core disciplines; in addition however, they are also supposed to develop skills in order to apply this particular knowledge in practice. This ideally goes hand in hand with a sense of maturity of the individuals’ characters vis-à-vis the social, cultural, and economical environment. The practical application of theoretical knowledge can thus only be implemented successfully, if these three basic elements are taken into account. The curricula for studies in Architecture and Architectural Process Management are fundamentally based on this comprehension and form the academic backbone of all elope projects.

In addition to students’ disciplinary knowledge, the ability to work efficiently within multi-cultural environments has become increasingly important. This cognition has led to universities becoming more proactive with regard to networking and offering joint courses, which is where elope is actively involved in.

elope sees itself as a learning system cooperating in a network of international universities and industry partners. It does so within a reflexive context, taking into account the various cultures involved in order to create new methods of resolution regarding teaching and learning. Students of the Master level are at the core of this concept and are given the opportunity to develop process-oriented expert knowledge through interdisciplinary, transcultural teamwork as well as the use of information and communication tools. Furthermore, elope respects the paradigm shift from supply-pushed to demand-pulled learning, i.e. to replace the swatting of facts by process knowledge.

A further characteristic of today‘s challenges is an increasing tendency for the overlapping, or even amalgamation, of various lines of work in order to give way to new, holistic, and transdisciplinary perspectives.

elope is a comprehensive platform which offers students the chance to contribute their full potential. Each individual’s attitudes, characteristics, and abilities are taken into account in order to allow as much space as possible for independent development of students’ responsibilities and skills. A contribution to the concept of “Campus in Mind“ is made by elope in providing the multidisciplinary teams with learning facilities that are based on experimental and interactive technologies.

elope is not only about to significantly remould the landscape of teaching and learning at universities, it also intends to yield substantial influence concerning decision-making and the creation of practical work processes. In association with university teaching staff, the mentors are instrumental in contributing expert knowledge and regular feedbacks to the teams, and at the same time they are also actively involved in the evaluation of processes and related products. The latter will be of increasing importance in the future, as scientific research has been initiated in connection with the integration of certain PBL (Problem-Based Learning) methods. It is the intention of this kind of research to support students with regard to the awareness of their personal learning styles. The findings are then made accessible for future work in a broader context.


Disciplines

Construction Engineering Management

Art

Building Equipmnet HVACR

N.N.

Architecture

Civil Engineering

N.N.

Sociologists

Stakeholders

CoachesFaculties

N.N.N.N.

Landscape Architecture

Urban Planning Transdisciplinary Project Team

Students

Mentors

Pedagogic Model

The students are at the centre of elope‘s working model. They build multidisciplinary teams with one (or two) student(s) coming from each profession. Since they originate from diffe-rent universities around the world, they bring together different methodologies to tackle a task and have access to an attractive set of faculty coaches. After the kick-off weeks, the students work in non-collocated, distributed, interdisciplinary teams – each team member administrates his/her disciplinary contribution but also assuming responsibilities for the entire process and final product as. The participating universities and industry partners send coaches and mentors to steer the development process.

Experts and mentors from the industry who are not part of the university are an additional and essential part of elope courses. Their participation contributes a high degree of practi-cal knowledge to the projects, pointing out the actual „state of the art“. In this manner, elope manages to link academic education and professional practice. The intensive inter-action between these two elements guarantees a rapid transfer of technology, while at the same time ensuring that the students involved are highly motivated.

The evaluation of the final project results are in the duty of an elope jury. Each team recei-ves a jury feedback with an acknowledgement of the contributions according to initially specified criteria. elope puts a strong emphasis on the assessment and self-assessment of the processes. This will be achieved by systematically requesting the students to reflect on the lessons learnt keeping Søren Kierkegaard‘s statement in mind that „life is lived for-wards, but only understood backwards“.

Multidisciplinarity & Multiculturality


Technical Prerequisites

Insurance

Academic Credits ECTS

Responsibilities

Partners

elope Alliance

3.2 Responsibilities of elope and its Partner Universities

elope as learning platform enables and facilitates interdisciplinary processes. It has proven to offer an excellent test bed for research in the field of modern teaching and learning as well as in the area of evaluation of novel learning spaces.

The elope Alliance partners of elope commit to the common challenge of a transdisci-plinary teaching and learning environment and actively work together in the system. They acquire and organize the elope projects on an yearly rotational basis.

The Bern University of Applied Sciences, School of Architecture, Wood and Civil Engineering (AWC/BUAS) takes the responsibility for the coordination of the projects (such as the review meetings, coaching sessions, etc.) The definition of the task is a joint process between all elope Alliance partners. As this year’s project elope 5 is co-organized by the Cologne University of Applied Sciences, all physical events (kick-off week and final review) will take place in Cologne.

elope‘s coordinating office together with the organizing Universitiy provide the necessary documentation for the course and offers an introduction to information and collaboration technologies.As client and partner the Public Building and Real-Estate Management Company BLB, the City of Cologne and Ministry of Education NRW and the CUAS-Department of technical building management, security and maintenance are supporting the elope 5 project ideally and financially.

It is important to put on record that the responsibility for the disciplinary supervision of the students remains with the sending home universities. A close coaching accompaniment and monitoring of the project by the faculty of the partner universities is essential and requested by elope. The participation of the responsible coaches during the kick-off events, the coaching sessions, the reviews, and the final presentations will add to the inter-disciplinary depth and thus to the quality of the projects.

This responsibility also relates to the grading of the students’ contribution. The elope jury will provide a qualification on the team processes and on the entire teams‘ interaction patterns. Finally, it is suggested that students who successfully participate in elope projects receive academic credits (e.g. based on the ECTS). The workload is estimated to range between 30–40% on average during the entire semester.

The experience during the previous elope courses has revealed that this double responsi-bility of the student towards his/her elope team and towards the home university and pro-fessors, respectively, may also bear conflicts. elope demands that team decisions be respected concerning the approach and the agreed objectives; elope leaders are con-vinced that within this framework there is still ample tether to adhere to high academic standards in the disciplinary work.

The involved faculty members will be invited to contribute their views in the definition of the task. They will receive full access to all documents of the elope project as well as to the communication software used in the project. Guaranteed access to a video conferencing system (e.g. Polycom, Tandberg, etc.) for participating students remains in the responsi-bility of each partner university and is essential for a successful collaboration process.

The responsibility for an appropriate insurance coverage remains with the students and the participating faculty.

The elope Alliance Partners:Bauhaus-University Weimar (BUW) GER, Bern University of Applied Sciences - Architecture Wood & Civil Engineering (BFH-AHB), Burgdorf CH, Cologne University of Applied Sciences (CUAS) GER, Haute Ecole du Paysage, d‘Ingénierie et d‘Architecture (HEPIA) Geneva CH, Polytech Marseille FR, Politecnico di Milano IT, Stanford University (CEE) Stanford USA, Tecnológico de Monterrey (ITESM), Campus Querétaro MEX


Dabei ist der Besonderheit des Bauensim laufenden Lehr- und Forschungsbe-trieb, der Erstellung von Neubauten inmehreren Bauabschnitten, dem suk-zessiven Abbruch der Bestandsgebäu-de, unter Beachtung des statischenAbbruchkonzeptes, sowie den Rau-manforderungen der FH Köln in be-sonderer Weise Rechnung zu tragen.

Perspektive für das rechtsrheinische KölnMit der Entscheidung zum Verbleibund zur Neustrukturierung des IWZder FH Köln am heutigen Standortwird auch die Entwicklung des rechts-rheinischen Köln entsprechend derstrukturpolitischen Initiativen der ver-gangenen Jahrzehnte weiter gestärkt.

Die Schaffung eines zukunftsweisen-den Hochschulstandortes leistet einenbedeutsamen Beitrag zur sozialen undökonomischen Stabilisierung derrechtsrheinischen Stadtteile und för-dert die Profilierung der Gesamtstadt.

Mit dem Umbau des Fachhochschul-standortes und seiner baulichen undraumstrukturellen Anpassung an heuti-ge und zukünftige Erfordernisse ist dieGelegenheit gegeben, die heute be-stehende räumliche und funktionaleIsolierung der FH aufzugeben, d.h. siezu den benachbarten Stadtteilen zuöffnen und mit diesen stadträumlich zuvernetzen.

Im Rahmen des Wettbewerbs ist des-halb auch herauszustellen, welcheMöglichkeiten zur Vernetzung desIWZ mit den umgebenden Stadtstruk-turen bestehen. Zudem ist darzustel-len, welche Ansätze für eine Adress-bildung und Attraktivierung des IWZan diesem Ort im Zusammenspiel mitder Umgebung sinnvoll sind.

Es gilt städtebauliche Entwürfe zu ent-wickeln, die aufzeigen, wie im Zusam-menwirken des IWZ mit seiner Umge-bung ein unverkennbares Quartier, ineiner städtebaulich verträglichen Dich-te entstehen kann.

7

WORRINGEN

ROGGENDORF

BLUMBERG

DEUTZ

ALTSTADTNORD

ALTSTADTSÜD

NIPPES

EHRENFELD

LINDENTHAL

KALK

MÜLHEIM

RODENKIRCHEN

PORZ

CHORWEILER

FITTARDDÜNNWALD

HÖHENHAUS

DELLBRÜCK

STAMMHEIM

HOLWEIDE

BUCHHEIM

MERHEIMHÖHENBERG

BRÜCK

RIEHL

MERKENICH

NIEHL

WEIDENPESCH

LONGERICH

MAUEN-HEIM

BILDER-STÖCKCHENOSSDORF

NEUSTADT-NORD

NEU-EHRENFELD

BICKEN-DORFVOGELSANG

MÜNGERSDORF BRAUNSFELD

LÖVENICH

WIDDERS-DORF

BOCKLEMÜNDMENGENICH

LIND-WEILER

PESCH

ESCH/AUWEILER

VOLKHOVEN/WEILER

HAIMERSDORF

SEEBERG

FÜHLINGEN

HUMBOLDT/GREMBERG

POLL

VINGST

OSTHEIM

WESTHOVEN ENSEN

NEUBRÜCK

RATH/HEUMAR

GREMBERG-HOVEN

URBACH

EISDORF

WAHNZÜNDORF

L

WAHNHEIDE

KLETTEN-BERG

SÜLZBAYEN-THALZOLLSTOCK

MARIENBURG

RADER-BERG

RONDORF

EIL

SÜRTH

WEIß

HAHNWALD

G

NEUSTADT-SÜD

HORBELL

GRENGEL

JUNKERSDORF

WEIDEN

RADERTHAL

MESSE

MÜNGERSDORFERSTADION

CONTAINER-BAHNHOF

F

INNEN-STADT

HBF

K Ö N I G S F O R S

W A H N E R H E I D

C

H

D Ü N N W A L D E RW A L D

IWZ

LAGE DES IWZ IM KÖLNER STADTGEBIET

Location IWZ: in 2 kilometers distance from Rhine river in the city district of Deutz next to Kalk and Gremberg with urban housing and shopping facilities in the neighborhood.

Location of Campus Deutz Engineering Science Center

(IWZ )


4.1 General Setting

What are the qualities of successful universities in the future? How do the new communi-cation technologies influence the learning modes of students? What are the requirements on the spatial structures to allow for ubiquitous and individualized studies - but at the same time, to provide offers for social interaction? What is lacking in existing buildings at universities to make them candidates for deconstruction?

These are a few questions that university leaders have to answer before new structures can be planned and built. It is unquestioned that the learning styles have changed consi-derably during the past years, partially due to new technologies, but also through project based study programs that are gaining acceptance and popularity. This paradigm shift calls for new spatial structures for learning which are characterized by terms like flexibility, learning landscapes, indoor/outdoor connectivity, etc. New university planning must consi-der the integration of the buildings in an urban structure to avoid an ivory tower bias. Furthermore, energy concepts have to be developed that can be extended for additional needs in the future and fulfilling the economic and ecologic criteria of today.

4.2 The Specific Situation in Cologne

The University of Applied Sciences Cologne belongs to the fast developing institutions of tertiary education in Germany. Growing student enrollment and changing requirements for educational infrastructure form the basis for a rigorous planning of the university which also includes demolishing of existing buildings. A competition of 50 planning ateliers (10 invited, 40 free) is on-going on the university’s site shown in the diagram above.

The university has established a list of requirements and expectations for the newly to be built facilities (see paragraph 2) which reflect the wish to establish an open infrastructure that allows for intense interaction between the disciplines and invites the dialogue with the public. Nevertheless, the planning follows standard procedures in Germany’s building in-dustry – which is a rather sequential one.

elope5 claims that a trans-disciplinary and synchronous development and planning is a mandatory goal for the many components necessary for such an educational facility. Despite the fact that the competition is already in process with first results to be expected in late October 2012, elope5 considers this challenge as an optimal opportunity to discuss and publish the necessary criteria for the further development of this academic institution – namely in a prototypal way that can also be used for other similar projects. Since some of the jury members of the University of Applied Sciences Cologne are the faculty members who will be co-operating in elope5, the trans-disciplinary criteria developed can be crucial in the selection and realization of the future facilities.

With the goal in mind to develop a campus infrastructure that is flexible enough to adapt to changes in society, technology (media) and future learning requirements, elope 5 will integrate the disciplines of architecture, urban planning, landscape architecture, civil engi-neer-ing, sociology, building technologies, construction engineering and management as well as the arts.The elope program generally has a double focus. It tries to meet the requirements and expectations of the stakeholders and also challenges the methodological aspects of trans-disciplinary collaboration and working methods.

4. The Task


Orthophoto Campus Deutz

19

WETTBEWERBSGEBIET (KERN- UNDMANTELBEREICH MIT ZU ERHALTEN-DEN GEBÄUDEN)

Altbau(Erhalt)

Zentralgebäude (Kreuzbau)

Mensa

Halle Nord

Bibliothek(Erhalt)

Halle West

Halle Ost

Halle Süd

Mantelbereich

Kernbereich

Aktuelle Fläche IWZ: 103.500 m²

Fläche Feuerwehr: 4.600 m²Fläche AWB Betriebshof: 14.800 m²Fläche Sozialhaus: 8.600 m²

Berufsschule

Pyramidenpark

Eito

rfer

Str

aße

Gummersbacher Straße

Deutz-Kalker-Straße Betzd

orfer Straß

e

Rei

tweg

Feuerwache

Gießener Straße

AWB

Sozialhaus

Deu

tzer

Rin

g (B

55)

An

der

Pu

lver

mü

hle

An

der

Pu

lver

mü

hle

Burgen

landstr

aße

Humboldtpark

Gremberger Straße

Östlich

e Zub

ring

erstraße

Alem

anne

nstr

aße

Sportplätze

P

P

Gumme

umm

Gumm

ersbacher Stersbacher Ste sba h S

traße raß ß

Pyramidenpark

Pyramidenpark

ra

ße

ra

ße

Eito

rfer

Str

Ei

torf

er S

tr

DeuDeu

lk -SSutz-Kalkerutz Kalker

StraßeStraße

Betzd

f

Betzd

orf

B

etzdo

rf

tbautAltt

P

fr S

fer S e

fer Straße

Gie

Gie

eßener Straß eßener Straß

ße ße

halt)(EruAlt

Feuerwache

Feuerwache

ooSo

raß

ususozozozialhaus

raß

ße ße

Berufsschule

eeeeeehule

WBA

verm

üh

le

h

verm

üh

le

An

der

Pu

lver

mü

hle

Ös

Ö

s

Rei

tweg

Rei

tweg

Mensa

sasenss

Halle NH H

Nord d N N No No

An

der

Pu

lvn

d

An

der

Pu

lv

Zub

ri

stliche Zu

bri

tli

h Z

Zb

ri Z

nt n Ze t Ze Zen

bä tralge t t eb eb äud ä

Kreuzbae (Kreuzba Kreuzbae (e ( (K (K

u u) u u) u)

)(Erhalt))hekBibliothh

P

r P

Rng

(B55

)

r Rin

g (B

55)

R B

55

A

A

in

g

i

n

gerstraß

e

in

gerstraß

e

H H l H

estHalle W

H d dHalle SüdH d d dH d

Deu

z

Deu

tzer

D

ze

zer

H Hal H

essestestst Wle W W

d

Halle Ost

Oste O O

nstr

aße

nstr

aße

rmü

hle

e

rm

üh

le

AlAl

Alem

anne

n

Alem

anne

n

Sportplätze

Sportplätze

ndstr

rgen

landstr

a

nla

rgen

landstr

a

aße

aße

aße

Humboldtpark

Humboldtpark

n d

er P

ulv

er d

n

der

Pu

lver

BB

BurgBurg

G

G

G

Gremberge

Gremberge

mb

Gremberge

An

An

r Sger S ger S

Straße Straße

ße Straße

Mantelbereich

nbereichKer

Mantelbereich

nbereich

Mantelbereich



nbereichKer


nbereich





Fläche Sozialhaus: Fläche AFläche Feuer

Fläche Sozialhaus: Fläche AFläche Feuer

Fläche Sozialhaus: WB Bet A AW

wehr: 4.600 m²Fläche Feuer

Fläche Sozialhaus: WB Betriebshof: 14.800 m²

wehr: 4.600 m²

WB Betriebshof: 14.800 m²

8.600 m²WB Betriebshof: 14.800 m²

wehr: 4.600 m²

8.600 m²WB Betriebshof: 14.800 m²

wehr: 4.600 m²

Fläche Sozialhaus: Fläche Sozialhaus: Fläche Sozialhaus: Fläche Sozialhaus: 8.600 m² 8.600 m²

Perimeter of the Competition Campus Deutz


4.4 Requirements and Expectations

The following aspects are the programmatic elements which are formulated in the corporate mission of the university‘s development plans:

• Close interaction of scientific work and student studies in a researching university of applied sciences.

• Diversity and plurality in the many fields of study and research.• The university as a learning organism where everyone is learning from everyone else.• Equal chances and fair treatment of all university members regardless of educational

religious, social or ethnic background.• Barrier-free inclusion of all members.• Conflict situations as opportunities for learning and for improvement.• Advanced teaching methods as a steady process of dialog and interaction to insure

high quality curricula according to professional standards and demands from practice.• Provision of chances for the forming of personalized educational profiles to all students.• International orientation of educational programs with a strong emphasis on the ability

to act in a globalizing and networking world. • Mutual transfer of knowledge between society and the professional worlds.• Further academic training programs in the sense of livelong learning. • Development of specific competence profiles with distinctive features to be well posi-

tioned in the academic world, through:

• High competences in distinct scientific and professional fields.• Interdisciplinary and social skills.• Close cooperation with regional partners in science, business and culture.• Educational programs that respect individuality, tolerance, social engagement and

innovation.

4.3 Expected Outputs

1 International Higher Education Facilities 2012, Status Report including the analysis summary of the research of existing campuses.

2 Design Guidebook and Facility Management Guidelines for the Development of the Campus of the University of Applied Sciences in Koeln 2012 - 2112. including strategies, rules and guidlines for the Cologne Campus Deutz to be developed into a innovative future-oriented learning and teaching environment.

3 Conceptional Urban Masterplan & Sample Detail Implementation showing with a case study the application of your strategies, rules and guidlines.


Campus Deutz todayCirculation level


4.6 Basic Background Information

There are several expertises and concept evaluations on the situation and needs on the “Campus Deutz” for engineering studies:

• Expertise about the needs and challenges for the UAS (Gutachten: Projekt-Profil-Definition, PRD, by rheform Entwicklungs- und Immobilien Management GmbH, 2009)

• Educational Diversity – Concept for modern higher education www1.fh-koeln.de/educational_diversity/02319/index.html

• Urban planning competition for the IWZ “Campus Deutz” (April 2012)

All those papers are written in German language. The most important aspects are inte-grated in the previous chapters.

4.5 Boundary Conditions of Stakeholders in Planning Process 2012

The university as contracting client has documented its requirements for the new campus in the urban planning contest as follows: • The new campus-buildings shall foster structural and conscious innovation in enginee-

ring education in Cologne.• It shall become a lively place, where students want to stay, meet, work and live. • The new campus shall be sustainable in materials, waste production and energy con-

sumption. • It shall be strongly linked to the urban environment, to city-life and communal needs

and interests.• It shall not have huge buildings.• The changing process shall have the least possible impact on university life while under

construction.• It shall leave possibilities for settlements for spin-offs and other business partners of

the university (techno-parc).• Urgent needs are places for learning in projects as well as new facilities for energy

supply, information technology and sports.


Sep 2012 Oct 2012 Nov 2012 Dec 2012 Jan 2013 Final Review Cologne, GERJan. 18th

Virtual Kick Off Sep. 20th

by Video Conference

Kick-Off Cologne, GEROct 7th-14th

Review 1Nov. 6th/7th

by Video Conference

Review 2Dec. 5th/6th

by Video Conference

also possibleby Video Conference

Final PreparationJan. 12th - 17th

Virt

ual C

oope

ratio

nP

hysi

cal P

rese

nce

A B C D

38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 01 02 03 04

< A > < B > < C > < D >


Preparation• Performance (approx. 5-10 min) by each disciplinary team to introduce elope partici-

pants on the Virtual Kick-Off (personal goals and motivation) Phase A | Virtual Kick-Off | Sept 20th 2012 by VCAnalysis, Communication, Vision, InterestsThe Phase A starts with the Vitual Kick Off and includes the time until we meet in Cologne for the Physical Kick Off. In this phase the students work within their disciplinary group or indiviudually. With the Virtual Kick Off session all participants get to know the virtual com-munication tools, that will be used for the project elope5. In this first phase the goal is to get a deeper impression and understanding of the topic. This important background will allow for a well-founded start into the project and to elabo-rate meaningful solutions within the multi-disciplinary team.

Phase A

5. Structure of the Course

5.1 Phases, Goals and Deliverables

Phase A Preliminary TaskThe task for elope 5 includes buildings (new, renovated or both) for the Civil Engineering program at Cologne University of Applied Sciences. Campuses are complex spaces with a myriad of formats, relationships to their surroundings, and their place in the hearts of stu-dents. Beginning to understand campus dynamics will allow each student to be more fully engaged with the Cologne Campus’ own qualities and complexities.

In order to bring a broader understanding of campuses to the Kick-Off in October we ask the following:

a) Analysis (individually / presentation in disciplinary team / per University)1. Explore your/a campus and begin to understand it in ways beyond which you cur-rently do. How does the campus divide study, class, eating and sleeping? How does it relate campus and off-campus uses. How are these relationships a function of history? Place? Weather? How do people studying different things see the campus differently? How is the campus different for students, faculty, and visitors?

2. Using documents easily available to you from Google, campus archives etc. “dia-gram” your campus in as many diagrams as needed so that others might understand its forms, complexities, and history. What are the hierarchies, the paths, traffic, and peda-gogical differences? What makes it special? What is its genius loci?

3. Once you have created these diagrams, simplify them into their most essential parts. Review them from the point of view of your future (multidisciplinary) team mem-bers. How can the information be conveyed in its simplest terms to help the colleagues of other disciplines learn about this many kinds of campuses?

4. Present your diagrams in an appropriate format (presentation, poster, animation…) and upload it on dropbox a head of the Physical Kick Off.

b) Vision (individually)How do you imagine the learning environment of the future? What is your personal vi-sion/dream seen from the point of view as a user? Each student creates an image in format A3 (horizontal) as collage, visualization, sketch, painting, modeling…representing the important aspects of his/her vision/dream. Hand in will be on the first day of the Physical Kick Off on Sunday 7th in the morning.

c) Questions / Interests (individually)Based on the information in the reader each student prepares a catalogue of 3 to 5 questions related to the campus and its context and environment. They can be ques-tions of understanding or topics of interest that you would like to understand broader/deeper and which you want to analyze during the Physical Kick Off. The questions will be shared on the first day of the Physical Kick Off on Sunday 7th.


Phase B | Physical Kick-Off in Cologne Germany | CW 41 2012Detailed Program see page 24/25. Goals1.Team- and trustbuildingBuild a profound social link among the students as a basis for a solid collaboration during the course of the project. Several team spirit workshops will be organized during the week.

2. Common understanding and first conceptMain goal is to get to a common transdisciplinary understanding of the topic and the task. Therefore the exchange of the results of phase A are essential. Each team enunciates a hypothesis as a result of their research work and presents possible scenarios. A first roadmap has to be developed including statements about the space of intervention, first ideas and concepts of the future learning environment in Deutz. This first common concepts need to be represented in a adapted graphic, volumetric, schematic... way.> interdependency of disciplines!

3. Stakeholders and local specificitiesThe students are given the unique opportunity to meet the clients represented by the Public building and Real-Estate Management Company BLB, the Urban Planning Authority of the City of Cologne and the UAS-Department of Construction and Building Management . Thereby the teams have to do research on-site and collect information as much as possib-le supported by the academic team to become acquainted with the local specificities. Becoming familiar with the on-site situation and boundary conditions of the Campus Deutz and its environment.

4. Project PlanningDefinition of the project’s process outline/plan: At the end of the kick-off week, the teams are to present a project plan including work packages, time line, definition of milestones, resource planning, schedule of further activities, etc. The presentation of the project plan to faculty, mentors, and experts concludes the kick-off week, dismissing the students to their home universities with comments and recommendations for the further course of the project. Each team has to agree on a possible timeline compatible with other academic obligations at the home university. Process planning includes the organisation of the team process, the definition of milestones, the development of an innovation process.

5. Communication and Collaboration ToolsDuring the week several communication and collaboration tools will be tested and presen-ted to get ready for the virtual team collaboration following the kick off week.

InputsSeveral inputs by the Stakeholders and lectures with a focus on learning environments, educational diversity, campus planning, transdisciplinary working methods and porcess planning are given to facilitate the start-up for the project with respect to a common nomenclature. Essential aspects of the project are addressed by the lectures, given by coaches and experts.

Deliverables (Forum | End of Kick-Off Presentation, October 13th)Presentation (NO ppt) with process planning wall, conceptual models, sketches, schemes, diagrams, movie etc. showing the following aspects:• A definition of the learning environment of the future. Visualize characteristics and

formulete a common statment.• Visualization of first common conceptual ideas for the site and its environment.• A map of interests: show the expections and interests of each of the team member,

emphazise related interests and interdependencies.• Visualization of the planned team process including milestones.• Define the teams‘ goal and deliverables for reveiw I with a perpective on the final

output you want to reach.

Phase B


Phase C | Work in Progress | CW 42 2012 – CW 3 2013Back at Home University | Virtual Collaboration

The goal of the third phase is to develop the design, to formulate expertises and to create innovative solutions – and to get physical. After the introductory days, the students return to their home universities. At the same time, they form local teams at the different locati-ons to exchange basic information useful for all project teams. The planning as well as the manufacturing of models or project documentations are managed over elope‘s information platform (dropbox). The teams will present the stage of their work on two intermediate reviews by using video-conferencing systems. Between the reviews, the teams organize weekly team meetings and coaching sessions together with the local coaches. To each team will be assigned a team of two team coaches in the role of tutors. They will follow the team process closly, will join the weekly team meetings and are contact person in case of conflicts.

All teams will maintain a blog. This is supposed to be used as a logbook and an exchange platform during the whole process of the project. By the end of each week the teams upload their main working progresses.

Goals for Review 1All teams present the results and the state of the project in relation to the self defined goals formulated during the Physical Kick Off and rational of decision taking.

Review 1 | By video conference November 6th and 7th 2012Per team: duration of presentation 20 minutes, questions and feedback 40 minutesA copy of each team‘s presentation is to be saved on Dropbox by November 4th midnight (CET - Attention to changing time: CEST > CET : -1h ).

Deliverables• PPT presentation (max. 20 slides) - all necessary elements to explain the project (plans,

collages, schemes, pictures, etc.)• Working model (digital/physical)• Visualization of process planning, next planned meetings and milestones, required

special, need of support by experts etc.• Definition of anticipated deliverables for Review 2 in consideration of the final project

goals.

Goals for Review 2Self-structured work: the goal is to achieve the milestones defined by each group at review 1 and to fullfill related expectations.

Review 2 | By video conference December 5th and 6th 2012Per team: duration of presentation 20 minutes, questions and feedback 40 minutesA copy of each team‘s presentation is to be saved on the SharePoint Server by December 3rd midnight (CET).

Deliverables• Deliverables were defined during Review 1 (individually per team) in consideration of the

final project goals.• During Review 2 the teams have to provide the main content of the project solutions.

They will get a guidance to follow for the final results in the Final Review.

Phase C


Phase D | Final | CW 3 2012Final Presentation of the Project | Physical/Virtual

GoalThe final presentation has the goal to show the final transdisciplinary project‘s results inclu-ding the projects process to the client and to offer possibilities for a discourse with users and planning authorities.

Final Presentation | January 18th 2013Per team: duration of presentation 20 minutes, questions and feedback 40 minutesA copy of each team‘s presentation is to be saved on the SharePoint Server by January 14thmidnight (CET). Output 1 International Higher Education Facilities 2012, Status Report2 Design Guidebook and Facility Management Guidelines for the Development of the Campus of the University of Applied Sciences in Koeln 2012 - 2112.3 Conceptional Urban Masterplan & Sample Detail Implementation

Final Presentation and Hand-In• PPT/pdf Presentation (max. 20 slides)

Documentation (DIN A4 Brochure five copies) Containing the three elements of the expected Output including the• Description of the transdisciplinary project• Teams‘ reflection on transdisciplinary collaboration and visualization of the working process• Conclusions, recommandations the Stakeholders, Partners and Clients

PosterMax. 6 Din A0 Posters horizontal including • all necessary scales (urban plan, situation, project plans, sections and elevations, details)

diagrams, schemes to understand the transdisciplinary project and its concept. • Visualization of atmospheric qualities of the project (Short movie, Anmimation, Collage...).• Visualization of the working process.

Models• Situation model to insert, scale 1: 500 & including landscape aspects• Conceptual models• Structural and spatial models scale 1:200 / 1:100 / 1:33 ... (in relation to the project)

Special Requirements (to be defined by coaches)• Short movie (max. 5 Minutes) - 3D animation/movie showing spatial qualities, qualities on

atmosphere...• Risk analysis• Team reflection, self assessment of the team process• etc.

DVD/CD-Rom of documentation - 5 copiesIncluding: Review presentations (.ppt), Documentaion (.pdf), texts (.pdf or .doc), plans, 3D/4D models (.dxf, .dwg), sketches (.tif), references, film material (.mpg) plus all data inclu-ding appendices.

Final Presentation of the ProjectThe final presentation has the goal to show the project‘s results to the client and to the users and to offer possibilities for a discourse with the stakeholders.

ExhibitionThe Presentation will be followed by an exhibition, location and date need to be confirmed.

Phase D


5.2 Assessment Criteria

The following four criteria will be used by an internationally composed jury of faculty and experts.

1. Understanding of the Topic, Analysis, Stakeholders Requirements

2. Transdisciplinary Concept, Innovation

3. Implementation

4. Process and Transdisciplinary Cooperation

5. Quality of Presentation and media used

5.3 Jury

Public Building and Real Estate Management Company BLBKerstin Hermann

Urban Planning Authority of the City of CologneKatharina Koch

UAS-Department of Technical Building Management, Felix Ammann

Team elope René Cousin, Oliver Sturm, Jens Jagdfeld, Cologne University of Applied Sciences Key Portilla Kawamura, Kathrin Merz, Bern University of Applied Sciences

CoachesHans-Joachim Bargstädt, Bauhaus-University, Weimar, GermanyJohn Barton, Stanford University, USACorina Ebeling, BUAS AWCE JMA, SwitzerlandJérome Giordano, Polytech‘Marseille, France Fabrizio Leoni, Politecnico di Milano, ItalyJürgen Melzner, Bauhaus-University, Weimar, GermanyNathalie Mongé, HEPIA, Geneva, SwitzerlandRodrigo Pantoja, ITESM, Querétaro, MexicoHerbert Schubert, FH Köln, Social Sciences, Germany Jan Zychlinski, BUAS, Social Sciences, Switzerland

Experts / Guests

Herbert Bley, Prof. Dr Eng. for air conditioning and ventilation engineering UASPaul Böhm, Dean of the Faculty of Architecture of Cologne University of Applied SciencesHeinrich Böll, Dipl.-Ing. Architekt BDA DWBPeter Bölsterli, Architect ETH SIA BSA RIBA, Co-founder of elopeCharles Job, Professor of Architecture and Design, BUASGarrick Jones, Academic, Businessman and Musician, London School of EconomicsAli Ganjavian, Architect AA London, Partner of Studio kg, founder of Studio BananaChristoph Holliger Dr. sc.nat Professor of Physics, Co-founder of elopeJoachim Huber, Lead of Research Unit, Architectural Processes, BUAS Guy Lafranchi, Professor of Architecture and Design, BUAS Stanislas Zimmermann, Head of Joint Master of Architecture, BUAS


6.2 Inputs during Physical Kick Off Learning Environments Garrick Jones, Key Portilla Kawamura, Ali Ganjavian

Methodology - Transdisciplinary WorkingJan Zychlinski Educational Diversity & ProfiLe2 Edith Hansmeier Basics and Tools in Process Planning Christoph Holliger

Stakeholder Requirements of the City of Cologne Kerstin Hermann, Felix Ammann Best Practice - Transdisciplinary Collaboration Christoph Adamietz

Campus Architecture John Barton

Green BuildingMichaela Lambertz

Resilient Universities from the Perspective of Social SciencesHerbert Schubert

6. Kick-Offs and Semester Schedule

6.1 Virtual Kick-Off | Detailed Program

elope 5Learning Environments - Campus CologneVirtual Kick-Off

Timezones (Difference related to CEST):

CDT: Mexico -7 hours

PST: California - 9 hours

by VC Who

Date Thursday, September 20th

CEST

5pm Welcome by elopeIntroduction

Team elope

15Presentation of the Partner Team elope

30

45

6pm

15

30* break *

45

7pm

15

30

45General Information / Questions all

8pm

Bauhaus University, WeimarBUAS JMA

HEPIA - GenevaPolytech'Marseile

Politecnico di MilanoStanford University

UAS Cologne

General IntroductionOrganisation of the Semester

Task Phase ATeam elope

Presentation of University Partners & StudentsPerformance per Discipline (10' each)

Requirements of the StakeholdersKerstin HermannKatharina KochFelix Ammann

Timezones (Difference related to CEST) CDT: Mexico -7 hours / PST: Caloifornia -9 hours


6.3 Physical Kick-Off Week in Cologne| Detailed Program

Time Sa. 06.10. So. 07.10. Mo.08.10. Tu.09.10. We.10.10. Th.11.10. Fr. 12.10. Sa. 13.10. So. 14.10

9°° WELCOME by Vice-PresidentSylvia Heuchemer

INPUT Process Planningby Christoph Holliger

INPUTCampus Architecture

by John Barton

INPUTResilient Universitiesby Herbert Schubert

PIN UPteam results

10°° INPUTeducational diversity ProfiLe² Inspiring eduby Edith Hansmeier

11°°

12°° LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS

by Garrick Jones & studio kg

13°°

Lunch Lunch Lunch Lunch Lunch Lunch Lunch

14°°DEBRIEFING

with all Coaches

15°°

16°° METHODOLOGY Transdicplinary

workingRound Table

TEAM reflecting the visit

17°°

18°° INPUTStakeholder

by Felix AmmannKerstin Hermann

INPUTBest Practice

Trans-D Collaborationby Christoph Adamietz

INPUTGreen Building

by Michaela Lambertz

19°° WELCOME in Cologne at the

HostelDinner Dinner Dinner Dinner Dinner

20°°

21°°

22°°

Arrival in Cologne &

Check-in at Youth Hostel Riehl

Schedule Physical Kick-Off - elope 5 Learning Environments - Campus Cologne | Fall 2012

open day for individual programm

FAREWELLDINNER

VISITCampus Deutz

Stakeholders,Students, Coaches

TEAMEvening

time forDEBRIEFING

in teams with individual coaches

time forDEBRIEFING


TEAMWORK

PRESENTATIONLearning

Environment and Diciplinary

Researchby all Students

TEAM BUILDINGWorkshop

by Christoph Holliger

VISIT

Deutz Areaby bike

TEAMExpectations/Wishes

Structure/Organization/ Preparation of visits

TEAMWORK

FORUMPresentation of

Teamwork Results

CLEAN UP

+ teams'

leisure time in cologne

TEAMWORK

TEAM SPIRIT

SURPRISE experimental rooms

DINNERall together

TEAMWORK individual coaches

feedback

PIN UP

team results poster present.

TEAMWORK+

Table Discussions Briefing and Debriefing

with Coaches

TEAM SPIRIT

Community Artby Paolo Knill and Ursina

Knill

TEAMWORK


feedback


feedbackTEAMWORK

DRAFT VERSION 2012-09-18


Time Sa. 06.10. So. 07.10. Mo.08.10. Tu.09.10. We.10.10. Th.11.10. Fr. 12.10. Sa. 13.10. So. 14.10

9°° WELCOME by Vice-PresidentSylvia Heuchemer

INPUT Process Planningby Christoph Holliger

INPUTCampus Architecture

by John Barton

INPUTResilient Universitiesby Herbert Schubert

PIN UPteam results

10°° INPUTeducational diversity ProfiLe² Inspiring eduby Edith Hansmeier

11°°

12°° LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS

by Garrick Jones & studio kg

13°°

Lunch Lunch Lunch Lunch Lunch Lunch Lunch

14°°DEBRIEFING

with all Coaches

15°°

16°° METHODOLOGY Transdicplinary

workingRound Table

TEAM reflecting the visit

17°°

18°° INPUTStakeholder

by Felix AmmannKerstin Hermann

INPUTBest Practice

Trans-D Collaborationby Christoph Adamietz

INPUTGreen Building

by Michaela Lambertz

19°° WELCOME in Cologne at the

HostelDinner Dinner Dinner Dinner Dinner

20°°

21°°

22°°

Arrival in Cologne &

Check-in at Youth Hostel Riehl

Schedule Physical Kick-Off - elope 5 Learning Environments - Campus Cologne | Fall 2012

open day for individual programm

FAREWELLDINNER

VISITCampus Deutz

Stakeholders,Students, Coaches

TEAMEvening

time forDEBRIEFING


time forDEBRIEFING


TEAMWORK

PRESENTATIONLearning

Environment and Diciplinary

Researchby all Students

TEAM BUILDINGWorkshop

by Christoph Holliger

VISIT

Deutz Areaby bike

TEAMExpectations/Wishes

Structure/Organization/ Preparation of visits

TEAMWORK

FORUMPresentation of

Teamwork Results

CLEAN UP

+ teams'

leisure time in cologne

TEAMWORK

TEAM SPIRIT

SURPRISE experimental rooms

DINNERall together


feedback

PIN UP

team results poster present.

TEAMWORK+

Table Discussions Briefing and Debriefing

with Coaches

TEAM SPIRIT

Community Artby Paolo Knill and Ursina

Knill

TEAMWORK


feedback


feedbackTEAMWORK

DRAFT VERSION 2012-09-18


6.4 Semester Schedule

10.0

9.20

12

elop

e 5

Learn

ing E

nvi

ronm

ents

- C

am

pus

Colo

gne

Sto

ryboard

Sem

est

er

| Fall

2012

SWC

WD

ate

Wha

t's u

p.To

pic

Part

icip

atio

nTi

me

Loca

tion

Inpu

tsD

ate

CW

138

17.0

9. M

o17

.09.

Mo

3818

.09.

Tu

18.0

9. T

u19

.09.

We

19.0

9. W

e20

.09.

Th

Virt

ual K

ick

Off

mee

ting

Wel

com

e +

Intro

duct

ion

Man

dato

ry fo

r all

stud

ents

5-8

pm C

ES

TV

C20

.09.

Th

21.0

9. F

r21

.09.

Fr

22.0

9. S

a22

.09.

Sa

23.0

9. S

u23

.09.

Su

239

24.0

9. M

o24

.09.

Mo

3925

.09.

Tu

25.0

9. T

u26

.09.

We

26.0

9. W

e27

.09.

Th

27.0

9. T

h28

.09.

Fr

28.0

9. F

r29

.09.

Sa

29.0

9. S

a30

.09.

Su

30.0

9. S

u

340

01.1

0 M

o01

.10

Mo

4002

.10.

Tu

02.1

0. T

u03

.10.

We

03.1

0. W

e04

.10.

Th

04.1

0. T

h05

.10.

Fr

elop

e M

etho

dolo

gy W

orks

hop

(2 d

ays)

Onl

y fo

r Coa

ches

2pm

CE

ST

Col

ogne

Gar

rick

Jone

s 05

.10.

Fr

06.1

0. S

aA

rriv

al G

erm

any

| Wel

com

e in

Col

ogne

Col

ogne

06.1

0. S

a07

.10.

Su

Sta

rt K

ick

Off

Ger

man

y M

anda

tory

for a

ll st

uden

tsP

hysi

cal

07.1

0. S

u4

4108

.10.

Mo

Man

dato

ry fo

r all

stud

ents

08.1

0. M

o41

09.1

0. T

uM

anda

tory

for a

ll st

uden

ts09

.10.

Tu

10.1

0. W

eM

anda

tory

for a

ll st

uden

ts10

.10.

We

11.1

0. T

hM

anda

tory

for a

ll st

uden

ts11

.10.

Th

12.1

0. F

rM

anda

tory

for a

ll st

uden

ts12

.10.

Fr

13.1

0. S

aM

anda

tory

for a

ll st

uden

ts13

.10.

Sa

14.1

0. S

uD

epar

ture

/Bac

k to

hom

e un

iver

sity

14.1

0. S

u

542

15.1

0. M

o15

.10.

Mo

4216

.10.

Tu

16.1

0. T

u17

.10.

We

17.1

0. W

e18

.10.

Th

18.1

0. T

h19

.10.

Fr

19.1

0. F

r20

.10.

Sa

20.1

0. S

a21

.10.

Su

21.1

0. S

u

643

22.1

0. M

o22

.10.

Mo

4323

.10.

Tu

23.1

0. T

u24

.10.

We

24.1

0. W

e25

.10.

Th

25.1

0. T

h26

.10.

Fr

26.1

0. F

r27

.10.

Sa

27.1

0. S

a28

.10.

Su

WIN

TER

TIM

E -1

28.1

0. S

u

744

29.1

0. M

o29

.10.

Mo

4430

.10.

Tu

30.1

0. T

u31

.10.

We

31.1

0. W

e01

.11.

Th

01.1

1. T

h02

.11.

Fr

02.1

1. F

r03

.11.

Sa

03.1

1. S

a04

.11.

Su

Due

dat

e fo

r ppt

/pdf

- P

rese

ntat

ion

Rev

iew

IM

anda

tory

for a

ll te

ams

04.1

1. S

u

845

05.1

1. M

o05

.11.

Mo

4506

.11.

Tu

Rev

iew

I | P

art 1

Man

dato

ry fo

r all

stud

ents

4-8p

m C

ET

VC

06.1

1. T

u07

.11.

We

Rev

iew

I | P

art 2

Man

dato

ry fo

r all

stud

ents

4-8p

m C

ET

VC

07.1

1. W

e08

.11.

Th

08.1

1. T

h09

.11.

Fr

09.1

1. F

r10

.11.

Sa

10.1

1. S

a11

.11.

Su

11.1

1. S

u

946

12.1

1. M

o12

.11.

Mo

4613

.11.

Tu

13.1

1. T

u14

.11.

We

14.1

1. W

e15

.11.

Th

15.1

1. T

h16

.11.

Fr

16.1

1. F

r17

.11.

Sa

17.1

1. S

a18

.11.

Su

18.1

1. S

u

1047

19.1

1. M

o19

.11.

Mo

4720

.11.

Tu

20.1

1. T

u21

.11.

We

21.1

1. W

e22

.11.

Th

22.1

1. T

h23

.11.

Fr

23.1

1. F

r24

.11.

Sa

24.1

1. S

a25

.11.

Su

25.1

1. S

u

1148

26.1

1. M

o26

.11.

Mo

4827

.11.

Tu

27.1

1. T

u28

.11.

We

28.1

1. W

e29

.11.

Th

29.1

1. T

h30

.11.

Fr

30.1

1. F

r01

.12.

Sa

01.1

2. S

a02

.12.

Su

02.1

2. S

u

1249

03.1

2. M

oD

ue d

ate

for p

pt/p

df: P

rese

ntat

ion

Rev

iew

IIM

anda

tory

for a

ll te

ams

03.1

2. M

o49

04.1

2. T

u04

.12.

Tu

05.1

2. W

eR

evie

w II

| P

art 1

Man

dato

ry fo

r all

stud

ents

4-8p

m C

ET

VC

05.1

2. W

e06

.12.

Th

Rev

iew

II |

Par

t 2M

anda

tory

for a

ll st

uden

ts4-

8pm

CE

TV

C06

.12.

Th

07.1

2. F

r07

.12.

Fr

08.1

2. S

a08

.12.

Sa

09.1

2. S

u09

.12.

Su

1350

10.1

2. M

o10

.12.

Mo

5011

.12.

Tu

11.1

2. T

u12

.12.

We

12.1

2. W

e13

.12.

Th

13.1

2. T

h14

.12.

Fr

14.1

2. F

r15

.12.

Sa

15.1

2. S

a16

.12.

Su

16.1

2. S

u

1451

17.1

2. M

o17

.12.

Mo

5118

.12.

Tu

18.1

2. T

u19

.12.

We

19.1

2. W

e20

.12.

Th

20.1

2. T

h21

.12.

Fr

21.1

2. F

r22

.12.

Sa

22.1

2. S

a23

.12.

Su

23.1

2. S

u

1552

24.1

2. M

oC

hris

tmas

Eve

24.1

2. M

o52

25.1

2. T

uC

hris

tmas

25.1

2. T

u26

.12.

We

Chr

istm

as26

.12.

We

27.1

2. T

h27

.12.

Th

28.1

2. F

r28

.12.

Fr

29.1

2. S

a29

.12.

Sa

30.1

2. S

u30

.12.

Su

161

31.1

2. M

oN

ew Y

ear's

Eve

31.1

2. M

o1

01.0

1. T

u01

.01.

Tu

02.0

1. W

e02

.01.

We

03.0

1. T

h03

.01.

Th

04.0

1. F

r04

.01.

Fr

05.0

1. S

a05

.01.

Sa

06.0

1. S

u06

.01.

Su

172

07.0

1. M

o07

.01.

Mo

208

.01.

Tu

08.0

1. T

u09

.01.

We

09.0

1. W

e10

.01.

Th

10.0

1. T

h11

.01.

Fr

Arr

ival

Ger

man

y | W

elco

me

in C

olog

ne

Col

ogne

11.0

1. F

r12

.01.

Sa

Fina

l Pre

para

tion

Col

ogne

Phy

sica

l/VC

12.0

1. S

a13

.01.

Su

Fina

l Pre

para

tion

Col

ogne

13.0

1. S

u18

314

.01.

Mo

Fina

l Pre

para

tion

Col

ogne

14.0

1. M

o3

15.0

1. T

uFi

nal P

repa

ratio

n C

olog

ne15

.01.

Tu

16.0

1. W

eD

eliv

ery

Fina

l D

ocum

enta

tion

Man

dato

ry fo

r all

team

s16

.01.

We

17.0

1. T

hD

eliv

ery

Mod

els

& P

rese

ntat

ion

Man

dato

ry fo

r all

team

s17

.01.

Th

18.0

1. F

rFi

nal R

evie

wM

anda

tory

for a

ll st

uden

tsal

l day

Phy

sica

l/VC

18.0

1. F

r19

.01.

Sa

Exh

ibiti

on (t

o be

con

firm

ed)

Man

dato

ry fo

r all

stud

ents

19.0

1. S

a20

.01.

Su

Dep

artu

re/B

ack

to h

ome

univ

ersi

ty20

.01.

Su

WEEKLY MEETINGSwith Team and with Coaches (Local and Team Coaches)


10.0

9.20

12

elop

e 5

Learn

ing E

nvi

ronm

ents

- C

am

pus

Colo

gne

Sto

ryboard

Sem

est

er

| Fall

2012

SWC

WD

ate

Wha

t's u

p.To

pic

Part

icip

atio

nTi

me

Loca

tion

Inpu

tsD

ate

CW

138

17.0

9. M

o17

.09.

Mo

3818

.09.

Tu

18.0

9. T

u19

.09.

We

19.0

9. W

e20

.09.

Th

Virt

ual K

ick

Off

mee

ting

Wel

com

e +

Intro

duct

ion

Man

dato

ry fo

r all

stud

ents

5-8

pm C

ES

TV

C20

.09.

Th

21.0

9. F

r21

.09.

Fr

22.0

9. S

a22

.09.

Sa

23.0

9. S

u23

.09.

Su

239

24.0

9. M

o24

.09.

Mo

3925

.09.

Tu

25.0

9. T

u26

.09.

We

26.0

9. W

e27

.09.

Th

27.0

9. T

h28

.09.

Fr

28.0

9. F

r29

.09.

Sa

29.0

9. S

a30

.09.

Su

30.0

9. S

u

340

01.1

0 M

o01

.10

Mo

4002

.10.

Tu

02.1

0. T

u03

.10.

We

03.1

0. W

e04

.10.

Th

04.1

0. T

h05

.10.

Fr

elop

e M

etho

dolo

gy W

orks

hop

(2 d

ays)

Onl

y fo

r Coa

ches

2pm

CE

ST

Col

ogne

Gar

rick

Jone

s 05

.10.

Fr

06.1

0. S

aA

rriv

al G

erm

any

| Wel

com

e in

Col

ogne

Col

ogne

06.1

0. S

a07

.10.

Su

Sta

rt K

ick

Off

Ger

man

y M

anda

tory

for a

ll st

uden

tsP

hysi

cal

07.1

0. S

u4

4108

.10.

Mo

Man

dato

ry fo

r all

stud

ents

08.1

0. M

o41

09.1

0. T

uM

anda

tory

for a

ll st

uden

ts09

.10.

Tu

10.1

0. W

eM

anda

tory

for a

ll st

uden

ts10

.10.

We

11.1

0. T

hM

anda

tory

for a

ll st

uden

ts11

.10.

Th

12.1

0. F

rM

anda

tory

for a

ll st

uden

ts12

.10.

Fr

13.1

0. S

aM

anda

tory

for a

ll st

uden

ts13

.10.

Sa

14.1

0. S

uD

epar

ture

/Bac

k to

hom

e un

iver

sity

14.1

0. S

u

542

15.1

0. M

o15

.10.

Mo

4216

.10.

Tu

16.1

0. T

u17

.10.

We

17.1

0. W

e18

.10.

Th

18.1

0. T

h19

.10.

Fr

19.1

0. F

r20

.10.

Sa

20.1

0. S

a21

.10.

Su

21.1

0. S

u

643

22.1

0. M

o22

.10.

Mo

4323

.10.

Tu

23.1

0. T

u24

.10.

We

24.1

0. W

e25

.10.

Th

25.1

0. T

h26

.10.

Fr

26.1

0. F

r27

.10.

Sa

27.1

0. S

a28

.10.

Su

WIN

TER

TIM

E -1

28.1

0. S

u

744

29.1

0. M

o29

.10.

Mo

4430

.10.

Tu

30.1

0. T

u31

.10.

We

31.1

0. W

e01

.11.

Th

01.1

1. T

h02

.11.

Fr

02.1

1. F

r03

.11.

Sa

03.1

1. S

a04

.11.

Su

Due

dat

e fo

r ppt

/pdf

- P

rese

ntat

ion

Rev

iew

IM

anda

tory

for a

ll te

ams

04.1

1. S

u

845

05.1

1. M

o05

.11.

Mo

4506

.11.

Tu

Rev

iew

I | P

art 1

Man

dato

ry fo

r all

stud

ents

4-8p

m C

ET

VC

06.1

1. T

u07

.11.

We

Rev

iew

I | P

art 2

Man

dato

ry fo

r all

stud

ents

4-8p

m C

ET

VC

07.1

1. W

e08

.11.

Th

08.1

1. T

h09

.11.

Fr

09.1

1. F

r10

.11.

Sa

10.1

1. S

a11

.11.

Su

11.1

1. S

u

946

12.1

1. M

o12

.11.

Mo

4613

.11.

Tu

13.1

1. T

u14

.11.

We

14.1

1. W

e15

.11.

Th

15.1

1. T

h16

.11.

Fr

16.1

1. F

r17

.11.

Sa

17.1

1. S

a18

.11.

Su

18.1

1. S

u

1047

19.1

1. M

o19

.11.

Mo

4720

.11.

Tu

20.1

1. T

u21

.11.

We

21.1

1. W

e22

.11.

Th

22.1

1. T

h23

.11.

Fr

23.1

1. F

r24

.11.

Sa

24.1

1. S

a25

.11.

Su

25.1

1. S

u

1148

26.1

1. M

o26

.11.

Mo

4827

.11.

Tu

27.1

1. T

u28

.11.

We

28.1

1. W

e29

.11.

Th

29.1

1. T

h30

.11.

Fr

30.1

1. F

r01

.12.

Sa

01.1

2. S

a02

.12.

Su

02.1

2. S

u

1249

03.1

2. M

oD

ue d

ate

for p

pt/p

df: P

rese

ntat

ion

Rev

iew

IIM

anda

tory

for a

ll te

ams

03.1

2. M

o49

04.1

2. T

u04

.12.

Tu

05.1

2. W

eR

evie

w II

| P

art 1

Man

dato

ry fo

r all

stud

ents

4-8p

m C

ET

VC

05.1

2. W

e06

.12.

Th

Rev

iew

II |

Par

t 2M

anda

tory

for a

ll st

uden

ts4-

8pm

CE

TV

C06

.12.

Th

07.1

2. F

r07

.12.

Fr

08.1

2. S

a08

.12.

Sa

09.1

2. S

u09

.12.

Su

1350

10.1

2. M

o10

.12.

Mo

5011

.12.

Tu

11.1

2. T

u12

.12.

We

12.1

2. W

e13

.12.

Th

13.1

2. T

h14

.12.

Fr

14.1

2. F

r15

.12.

Sa

15.1

2. S

a16

.12.

Su

16.1

2. S

u

1451

17.1

2. M

o17

.12.

Mo

5118

.12.

Tu

18.1

2. T

u19

.12.

We

19.1

2. W

e20

.12.

Th

20.1

2. T

h21

.12.

Fr

21.1

2. F

r22

.12.

Sa

22.1

2. S

a23

.12.

Su

23.1

2. S

u

1552

24.1

2. M

oC

hris

tmas

Eve

24.1

2. M

o52

25.1

2. T

uC

hris

tmas

25.1

2. T

u26

.12.

We

Chr

istm

as26

.12.

We

27.1

2. T

h27

.12.

Th

28.1

2. F

r28

.12.

Fr

29.1

2. S

a29

.12.

Sa

30.1

2. S

u30

.12.

Su

161

31.1

2. M

oN

ew Y

ear's

Eve

31.1

2. M

o1

01.0

1. T

u01

.01.

Tu

02.0

1. W

e02

.01.

We

03.0

1. T

h03

.01.

Th

04.0

1. F

r04

.01.

Fr

05.0

1. S

a05

.01.

Sa

06.0

1. S

u06

.01.

Su

172

07.0

1. M

o07

.01.

Mo

208

.01.

Tu

08.0

1. T

u09

.01.

We

09.0

1. W

e10

.01.

Th

10.0

1. T

h11

.01.

Fr

Arr

ival

Ger

man

y | W

elco

me

in C

olog

ne

Col

ogne

11.0

1. F

r12

.01.

Sa

Fina

l Pre

para

tion

Col

ogne

Phy

sica

l/VC

12.0

1. S

a13

.01.

Su

Fina

l Pre

para

tion

Col

ogne

13.0

1. S

u18

314

.01.

Mo

Fina

l Pre

para

tion

Col

ogne

14.0

1. M

o3

15.0

1. T

uFi

nal P

repa

ratio

n C

olog

ne15

.01.

Tu

16.0

1. W

eD

eliv

ery

Fina

l D

ocum

enta

tion

Man

dato

ry fo

r all

team

s16

.01.

We

17.0

1. T

hD

eliv

ery

Mod

els

& P

rese

ntat

ion

Man

dato

ry fo

r all

team

s17

.01.

Th

18.0

1. F

rFi

nal R

evie

wM

anda

tory

for a

ll st

uden

tsal

l day

Phy

sica

l/VC

18.0

1. F

r19

.01.

Sa

Exh

ibiti

on (t

o be

con

firm

ed)

Man

dato

ry fo

r all

stud

ents

19.0

1. S

a20

.01.

Su

Dep

artu

re/B

ack

to h

ome

univ

ersi

ty20

.01.

Su

WEEKLY MEETINGSwith Team and with Coaches (Local and Team Coaches)


7 People

Dino ZizzariTechnical Support [email protected]

Rahel SteffenAdministration [email protected]

7.1 Team elope

Organization

Cologne University of Applied SciencesInstitute for Technical Building Services ITG | | www.f09.fh-koeln.de

Lead elopeKathrin MerzArchitect ETH SIAResearch [email protected]

René Cousin Dr.- [email protected]

Lead, Coordination, Co-Organization

Bern University of Applied Sciences (BFH), SwitzerlandArchitecture Wood and Civil Engineering (AHB) | www.ahb.bfh.ch

Lead elopeKey KawamuraArchitect BSc Hons, AA Dip, REG, SIAResearch [email protected]

Jens Jagdfeld Master Student in Engineering [email protected]

Oliver Sturm M. EngResearch [email protected]


Jan ZychlinskiProfessor Social Sciences [email protected]

Corina Ebeling Architect ETHResearch [email protected]

Hans-Joachim Bargstädt, Dr.-Eng. Dean of Faculty of Civil [email protected]

Jürgen Melzner, Dipl. Eng (FH) Research [email protected]

7.2 Coaches

Bauhaus-University Weimar, GermanyConstruction Engineering and Management | www.uni-weimar.de

Bern University of Applied Sciences, SwitzerlandJoint Master of Architecture | www.ahb.bfh.ch Social Sciences | www.soziale-arbeit.bfh.ch

Haute Ecole du Paysage, d‘Ingénierie et d‘Architecture Geneva, SwitzerlandLandscape Architecture | http://hepia.hesge.ch

Nathalie Mongé, Architect D.P.L.GResearch [email protected]

Politecnico di MilanoScuola di Architettura e Società | www.polimi.it

Fabrizio Leoni, Architect PhD Politecnico di MilanoAssistant Professor of Architectural and Urban Design, Master of [email protected]


John Barton, ArchitectDirector, Stanford Architectural Design Program [email protected]

Instituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey ITESM, MexicoArchitecture, Campus Querétaro | www.itesm.edu

Stanford UniversityArchitecture | www.stanford.edu

Rodrigo Pantoja Calderòn Architect Director of School of [email protected]

Cologne University of Applied SciencesApplied Social Sciences | http://www.sozial-raum-management.de

Polytech‘MarseilleCivil Engineering | http://www.polytech-marseille.fr/

Jerome Giordano, Civil Eng.Maître de Conférences, Département Génie Civl [email protected]

Herbert Schubert , Prof. Dr.phil. Dr. rer. hort. habil Institute of Management and Organisation in Social Work ([email protected]


Kerstin HermannFacility Management & Energy [email protected]

Public Building and Real Estate Management Company BLBhttps://www.blb.nrw.de/BLB_Hauptauftritt/index.php

Urban Planning Authority of the City of Colognewww.stadt-koeln.de/4/stadtplanung/

UAS-Department of Construction and Building Management (Unit 10) www.fh-koeln.de

Felix AmmannDipl.-Ing. (FH) Lead Unit 10 Construction and Project [email protected]

Anna Luisa Müller Urban Planning Authority of th City of Cologne

Katharina Koch Urban Planning Authority of th City of Cologne [email protected]

7.3 Partners


7.4 Guests and Experts (physical Kick Off)

Paolo Knill, Dr. h.c. Rector EGS European Graduate School, Leuk, CHhttp://expressivearts.egs.edu

Garrick Jones Academic, businessman and musician, based in London. Fellow at the London School of Economics, Senior Tutor at the Royal College of Art (RCA-IDE), Senior Partner of the Ludic Group LLP www.ludicgroup.com

Christoph Holiger Dr. sc.natProfessor of Physics at FHNWfounder of elope learning and teaching platform Leader and founder of POLE Projectwww.pole-project.ch

Peter Bölsterli Architect ETH SIA BSA RIBAx6.office for architectural design & research china delegate, rector‘s conference of the swiss uas

Ali Ganjavian Architect AA London, Partner of Kawamura Ganjavian, Madrid & Lausanne www.studio-kg.com Co-founder of studio Banana, www.studiobanana.org

Ursina Angelina KnillPerformer, Singer, Musician, Researcherhttp://www.eineartschule.net/

Christoph Adamietz Dipl.-Ing./ Dipl.-WirtZWP Ingenieur-AGPlanning and monitoring in the areas of building services and facility-related environmental protection; facility management

Edith Hansmeier, Dipl. Päd. Vice-Dean for Studies and Teaching , Faculty of Process Engineering, Energy and Mechanical Systems Cologne University of Applied Sciences

Michaela Lambertz Dr.-Ing. Drees & Sommer Advanced Building Technologies GmbH


01 Bernstein________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

02 Marie Curie________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

03 Da Vinci________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

04 Fibonacci________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

05 Galilei________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Teams


Appendices

I Basics Data - Urban PlanningII Basics Data - Campus Cologne / CompetitionIII Virtual Collaboration IV Bibliography V Miscellaneous Helpful Information Links Maps

Rudolf Schwarz. Köln eine Doppelstadt [In: Das neue Köln. Ein Vorentwurf. Köln 1950]


I Basics Data - Urban PlanningHistorical Map with Fortification around 1900


Appendices

I Basics Data - Urban PlanningMasterplan CologneI Basics Data - Urban PlanningMasterplan Cologne


I Basics Data - Urban PlanningType of Green Zones, Masterplan


Appendices

I Basics Data - Urban Planning | Competition DeutzExcerpts of the Competition Program p.7 / p: 40 ff

Perspektive für das rechtsrheinische KölnMit der Entscheidung zum Verbleib und zur Neustrukturierung des IWZ der FH Köln am heutigen Standort wird auch die Entwicklung des rechtsrheinischen Köln entsprechend der strukturpolitischen Initiativen der vergangenen Jahrzehnte weiter gestärkt. Die Schaffung eines zukunftsweisenden Hochschulstandortes leistet einen bedeutsamen Beitrag zur sozialen und ökonomischen Stabilisierung der rechtsrheinischen Stadtteile und fördert die Profilierung der Gesamtstadt.

Mit dem Umbau des Fachhochschulstandortes und seiner baulichen und raumstrukturellen Anpassung an heutige und zukünftige Erfordernisse ist die Gelegenheit gegeben, die heute bestehende räumliche und funktionale Isolierung der FH aufzugeben, d.h. sie zu den benachbarten Stadtteilen zu öffnen und mit diesen stadträumlich zu vernetzen.Im Rahmen des Wettbewerbs ist deshalb auch herauszustellen, welche Möglichkeiten zur Vernetzung des IWZ mit den umgebenden Stadtstrukturen bestehen. Zudem ist darzustellen, welche Ansätze für eine Adressbildung und Attraktivierung des IWZ an diesem Ort im Zusammenspiel mit der Umgebung sinnvoll sind.

Es gilt städtebauliche Entwürfe zu entwickeln, die aufzeigen, wie im Zusammenwirken des IWZ mit seiner Umgebung ein unverkennbares Quartier, in einer städtebaulich verträglichen Dichte entstehen kann.

Landschaftsplanerische Rahmenbedingungen und ZieleDie Stadtteile Deutz und Kalk sind aufgrund ihrer städtebaulichen Entwicklung die mit nutzbaren Grünflächen am schlechtesten versorgten Stadtteile. Durch den Bau von Erschließungstrassen nach dem Zweiten Weltkrieg entstan-den lediglich straßenbegleitende Gehölzanpflanzungen als Schutzanpflanzungen, die jedoch für den Bürger nicht nutzbar sind. Darüber hinaus wurden im Wohnungsbau der Nachkriegszeit zum Teil halböffentliche Grünflächen als Abstandsgrün geschaffen. Eine Vernetzung dieser Strukturen ist nicht erkennbar. Öffentlich nutzbare Grün- oder Freiräume fehlen. Auch der Fachhochschulstandort ist durch Grünstrukturen geprägt, die in der Regel nur Abstandsfunktionen erfüllen.Im Umfeld des Wettbewerbsgebiets (Mantelbereich und darüber hinaus) existieren öffentliche Grünflächen, die als solitäre Grünanlagen angelegt wurden. Zu den Anlagen gehören:

1) Humboldtpark, der 1912-14 nach Plänen von Fritz Encke auf dem Gelände einer ehemaligen Pulverfabrik ange-legt wurden; ca. 2,2 ha große Parkanlage, für die zur Zeit ein Sanierungskonzept erarbeitet wird.

2) Deutzer Stadtgarten, auf einem ehemaligen Festungswerk angelegte Grünfläche, die in ihrer Nutzbarkeit und Erreichbarkeit sehr durch den Deutzer Ring und die Östliche Zubringerstraße geprägt ist.

3) Bürgerpark Kalk, der ca. 2,8 ha große Park wurde 2007 auf dem Gelände der ehemaligen Chemischen Fabrik Kalk angelegt und ist durch ein vielfältiges Nutzungsangebot geprägt.

4) Alter Deutzer Friedhof, 1922 geschlossen, Umgestaltung 1957 zur Bundesgartenschau; heute Ausgangspunkt eines Grünzuges, der sich vom ehemaligen Deutz- Kalker-Bad (heute Günnewig Hotel Stadtpalais) bis zur Eisenbahntrasse erstreckt und somit die Stadtteile Deutz und Kalk miteinander verbindet. In diesen Grünzug ist der Pyramidenpark einbezogen.

Diese vier Grünanlagen sind miteinander und in die Stadtteile hinein nur über das öffentliche Straßennetz verbunden. Verbindungen zum übergeordneten Grünsystem fehlen. Entsprechend ihrer Größe, Lage und Ausstattung erfüllen die Grünanlagen Stadtteilfunktionen. Die vier Grünanlagen liegen in etwa kreisförmig um das IWZ. Da die heutige städte-bauliche Struktur der Fachhochschule keinen Bezug zur gewachsenen Stadtstruktur der Stadtteile Deutz, Kalk und Humboldt-Gremberg aufnimmt, fehlt auch ein adäquater Bezug zu den umliegenden Grünflächen.Auch die vorhandene Höhenentwicklung der Verkehrs- und Bewegungsflächen steht einer selbstverständlichen Aneignung entgegen. Die Umstrukturierung des Fachhochschul-Standortes bietet die einmalige Gelegenheit, die drei Stadtteile und auch die umliegenden Grünflächen über diesen Bereich zu verbinden. Den öffentlich nutzbaren Freiräumen kommt in diesem Fall eine besondere Bedeutung zu.


I Basics Data - Urban PlanningPerspectives - Urban development and urban planning in the postindustrial Cologne 1990 - 2030

45

FÜR KONVERSIONSPROZESSE ZUR VERFÜGUNG STEHENDE EHEM. INDUSTRIEAREALE

ZUSAMMENWACHSEN DER EHEM. DORFKERNE ZU EINEM GEMEINSAMEN SIEDLUNGSVERBAND

EHEM. INDUSTRIEAREALE ALS CHANCE FÜR NEUSTRUKTURIERUNGEN

ZUKÜNFTIGE VERKNÜPFUNG EINZELNER TEILAREALE

GROßES DEFIZIT AN ATTRAKTIVEN UND VERKNÜPFTENFREIRÄUMEN

STÄRKERE VERKNÜPFUNG MIT DEM ÜBERGEORDNE-TEN FREIRAUMSYSTEM, SOWIE DICHTERE ABFOLGEVON AUFENTHALTSORTEN

Perspektiven – Stadtplanung und Städtebau im postindustriellen Köln 1990 bis 2030(Quelle: Streitberger/Müller (hg.) 2011: Rechtsrheinische Perspektiven. Stadtplanung und Städtebau im postindustriellen Köln. 1990 bis 2030. Köln: 168 - 170; Entwurf: Rübsamen + Partner, Bochum et al.)


Task description of urban planning competition

Surroundings:The new face of the complex shall integrate the surrounding city districts of Deutz, Kalk and Gremberg and densify the urban space.• Public places have high value• All open spaces shall be usable (unusable green areas shall be transformed)• New definition of uses like urban boulevards

Connections:• The existing connections shall be intensified.• The neighboring professional college shall be connected for cooperation.

Core area:• A compact campus efficiently organized shall fit into the urban structure.• The Deutzer Ring (highly frequented street) shall be fenced by built structures.• The area shall get a distinctive and individual character.• The new volumes and their hights and the different entrance situations will be of high importance.• The remodeled earth structure shall be flattened to city level.• The orientation on the campus shall be clear and easy to understand.• The environment shall allow interaction of users and shall enable intensive knowledge transfer.• A reserve area for future buildings of about 10 000 m² NGF shall be provided.• The openings and their orientation shall allow varying connections between inside and outside.• The use of space shall be economical, ecological and at high quality standards• Sustainability and low running costs are important factors

I Basics Data - Urban PlanningDevelopment Concepts concerning the right side of the river Rhein


Space Allocation / Users Faculties• Architecture (F05)• Civil engineering and environmental technologies (F06)• Electrical engineering and information technology (F07)• Vehicle systems and production (F08)

• Process, energy and machine systems (F09)

Other services• Central institute of Physics (Phy)• Central mechanical and electrical workshops (ZW)• Local administration (HV)• Campus IT• Center for key competences and advanced education (ZaQwW)• Library (BIB)• Restaurant + cafeterias (SW)• Student parliament (AStA)• Religious student Communities (ESG +KHG)

Number of Students• 2007/2008 - 6.679 Students• 2010/2011 - 7.258 Students• 2011/2012 - 8.300 Students

10 bachelor-studies and 13 post graduate studies (master-studies)

elope5-basic info rev03

4

office laboratorytechnical

hallsteaching general

teaching specific storage special use total

F 05 - architekture 1 016 1 200 0 866 1 164 265 500 5 011F 06 - civil engineering & environmental protection 823 1 237 700 727 603 206 250 4 546F 07 - Informations-, Medien- und Elektrotechnik 2 549 4 055 700 1 826 2 704 672 0 12 506F 08 - automotive and prodruction eng. 1 811 3 134 900 1 495 1 262 515 0 9 117F 09 - process, energy- and mechanical systems 2 342 4 355 600 1 940 1 833 712 0 11 782institut for technology in tropic regions (ITT) 378 225 0 64 95 9 0 771

sum 8 919 14 206 2 900 6 918 7 661 2 379 750 43 733

HIS - key figure calculation for scientific institutions - lecture and research facilities

according to expertise –project-profile definition - rheform

Laboratory building North

restaurant

architecture & civil eng.

Central building

library

Laboratory building West

Laboratory building East

Laboratory building South

professional college

II Basics Data - Campus Cologne


Space Requirements - Existing Situation

110 251 m² gross floor space / gross building area (GBA)60 500 m² utilisation surface (NGF)

Name Date of complet. No. of floors GBA m² Laboratory building North 1978 3 5‘277Laboratory building North 1978 3 12‘914Central Building 1977 14 46‘509Laboratory building South 1978 3 1‘094Laboratory building West 1978 3 11‘576Library 2001 4 4‘630Archtect. + Civil Eng. 1967 5 21‘982Restaurant + Cafeteria 1980 4 4‘492Sum 108‘474

Requirements for New Facilities in relation to the current situation

elope5-basic info

campus building volumes

rev03

5

campus building volumes

II Basics Data - Campus Cologne


© rheform 18/11/2009 45

PPD Campus Domgärtender Fachhochschule Köln

Anforderungsprofil Funktions- und Flächenprogramm

Wissenstransfer

WIssenstransfer

intern extern

Kommunikation

Lernwelt

Präsentation

Um den internen und externen Wissensaustausch zu fördern, sind die beiden Elemen-te Kommunikation und Lernwelt die wesentlichen Bestandteile, die in der baulichenUmsetzung besondere Berücksichtigung finden sollen. Die funktionale Organisationdieser Elemente wird auf den folgenden Seiten näher erläutert. Unter dem Aspekt der Kommunikation wird zum einen die interne und zum anderen dieexterne Kommunikation zusammengefasst. Aufgrund der vielfältigen Ausprägung vonInformationsaustausch, wie z.B. formelle und informelle Besprechungen oder geplanteund spontane Begegnungen, sollten entsprechende Raumstrukturen vorgesehen wer-den, die diesen Wissenstransfer fördern. Für die unterschiedlichen Bedürfnisse und Arbeitsweisen der Studierenden, wie z.B.konzentrierte Einzelarbeit oder gemeinsame Gruppenarbeit, sollen ebenfalls entspre-chende Flächen vorgesehen werden. Diese sollen zusammen mit den Lehrflächen,den Bibliotheksflächen und den Flächen der Fakultäten zu einer Lernwelt vernetzt wer-den. Dies kann unterstützt werden durch zentral angeordnete Flächen, wie z.B. das Foyer,für Präsentationen und Ausstellungen der einzelnen Einrichtungen

Wissensaustauschintern und extern

© rheform 18/11/2009 45



Wissenstransfer

WIssenstransfer

intern extern

Kommunikation

Lernwelt

Präsentation



© rheform 18/11/2009 46



Lernwelt

Leseplatz

Bibliothek Fakultät

Hörsaal

Seminar

laut

leise

zentral dezentral

Laptop

LoungeGruppen-arbeitsplatz

Einzel-arbeitsplatz

Die Darstellung zeigt die unterschiedlichen Ausprägungen von Studentischen Arbeits-plätzen und deren funktionale Zusammenhänge mit den Hörsälen, Seminarräume, Bib-liotheks- und Fakultätsflächen Die Verknüpfung der einzelnen Bereiche bildet zusam-men die sogenannte "Lernwelt". Lehre, Lernen und Bibliothek sind eine Einheit, diessollte auch im baulichen Konzept zum Ausdruck kommen.Je nach Bereich sind in der Lernwelt unterschiedliche Typen von studentischen Ar-beitsplätzen enthalten. Die Art der studentischen Arbeitsplätze ist abhängig von der An-ordnung zentral oder dezentral, und ob sie sich in einer leisen oder lauten Arbeitsum-gebung befinden. Die studentischen Einzelarbeitsplätze können im Bereich der Fakultätsflächen ange-ordnet werden. Sie dienen der konzentrierten Einzelarbeit in ruhiger Umgebung (vgl.auch Leseplätze in der Bibliothek). In der Nähe zu den Seminarräumen können Flächen für offen gestaltete, loungeartigeBereiche vorgesehen werden. Zwischen den Veranstaltungen dienen sie zum kurzzei-tigen Treffen und Wissensaustausch von Studierenden und Lehrenden. Die studentischen Gruppenarbeitsplätze sollten zentral in guter Erreichbarkeit zu denHörsälen, zur Bibliothek sowie zu den zentral angeordneten Seminarräume liegen. Siedienen der gemeinsamen Gruppenarbeit und sollten so angeordnet werden, dass kei-ne akustisch Beeinträchtigung andere Bereiche verursacht wird. Da Hörsäle und Bibli-otheken viel Publikumsverkehr generieren, sind sie zentral in guter Erreichbarkeit zuplanen. Deshalb sollten sich die Gruppenarbeitsplätze im Bereich eines Hörsaalzen-trums und der Bibliothek sowie des zugehörigen Foyers angegliedert werden. Ebenfalls auf den Flächen der Bibliothek sollten Leseplätze eingeplant werden. Im Ge-gensatz zu den Gruppenarbeitsplätzen dienen sie, ähnlich wie die studentischen Ein-zelarbeitsplätze, der individuellen und konzentrierten Einzelarbeit.Bei allen studentischen Arbeitsplätzen sollte die Möglichkeit für einen Laptopanschlussverfügbar sein. Weitere Ausführungen zu den Bereichen Bibliothek, Hörsaal und Seminar sowie zuden Fakultäten finden sich bei den Einzeldarstellungen.

Lernwelten mit Studentischen Arbeitsplätzen

© rheform 18/11/2009 45



Wissenstransfer

WIssenstransfer

intern extern

Kommunikation

Lernwelt

Präsentation



Source: Expertise Projekt-Profil-Definition, PRD, by rheform Entwicklungs- und Immobilien Management GmbH, 2009

II Basics Data - Campus Cologne Function Diagrams


Appendices

© rheform 18/11/2009 58



Fakultät 09 - Anlagen-, Energie- und Maschinensysteme

Dekanat

Kommunikation

BüroFS

Lern

wel

t

Anlagen, Energie- und MaschinensystemeFH Köln Vernetzung

AV

TGA

DV-LaboreIWA

Labore F 09

Lager

LagerArchiv

StudAP

Büro

F 08

Büro

Maschinenbau

IPK

RE

LT

ITT

F 07

Versuchs-hallen

Versuchshallen

Funktionsschema

In der Fakultät für Anlagen, Energie und Maschinensysteme wird ein besonderes Au-genmerk auf die Bearbeitung komplexer Zusammenhänge und auf den verantwor-tungsbewussten Einsatz von Technik gelegt. Neben dem theoretischen Basiswissen inder Lehre werden Studierenden durch Projekte praxisorientierte Kenntnisse, mit derUnterstützung von 51 Professuren, vermittelt. Darüber hinaus zeichnet sich die Fakul-tät über ein weites Forschungsspektrum in unterschiedlichen themenverwandten Be-reichen aus und verfügt über Kooperationen zur Industrie.

Kurzprofil F09

Das Funktionsschema stellt zum einen die Verflechtung innerhalb der Einrichtungender Fakultät für Anlagen, Energie- und Maschinensysteme sowie zum anderen diefunktionalen Beziehungen zu den übrigen Einrichtungen der Fachhochschule dar. Die Fakultätsflächen sollen auf dem Campus so angeordnet werden, dass eine funktio-nale und räumliche Vernetzung zu anderen Einrichtungen der Fachhochschule ermög-licht wird und Kommunikation sowie Wissensaustausch stattfindet. In der Planung sollen den fünf integrierten Instituten anteilig und bedarfsgerecht Büro-und Lagerflächen zugewiesen werden, die in eine funktionale Anordnung eingebundensind.

Die zu planenden Großlabore sind fakultätsnah und möglichst zentral zu planen. DieAnordnung in einem gemeinsamen Hallenkomplex mit den Großlaboren der Fakultäten06, 07 und 08 ist wünschenswert, aber vor allem der Zusammenschuss mit Fakultät08. Werkstätten, Versuchs- und Produktionshallen, benötigen spezifische Ausstat-tungsmerkmale. Zum einen sollen sie besondere Lasten tragen können und z.T. er-schütterungsfrei sein sowie über baukonstruktive Einbauten wie eine Kranbahn verfü-gen. Darüber hinaus sollen die Werkstätten in direkter Nachbarschaft zueinander lie-gen und über Verbindungstüren miteinander verbunden werden. Für die Fakultät kön-nen technische Labore, Röntgenräume, Filmbearbeitungs- und Rechnerräume, Che-mielabore in Obergeschossen untergebracht werden. Allgemeine Lagerräume und Ar-chive können im Untergeschoss geplant werden.

Funktionsprogramm F09

Global function diagram

Specific function diagram(Faculty 09)

II Basics Data - Campus Cologne Function Diagrams


III Virtual Collaboration

> Video Conferencing Quick Tips

Prerequisites• Place the camera directly above the monitor that has the video of your partner• If there are windows in the room, close any drapes or blinds. Daylight is a variable light source and can conflict

with interior room lighting.• Let your colleagues know that you are in a videoconference so that you will not be disturbed.• Provide an agenda and specific start and stop times before the meeting.• If content is to be shared, email a backup copy to all meeting participants before the meeting.• Make sure you have the video number(s) of the site you want to call or that the site is listed in a directory.

During the Meeting• Greet your partner just like in a normal face-to-face conversation.• Once in the conference, introduce all of the participants at your location and encourage other site to do the same.• Ask if everything is working properly.• Checked or striped clothing increases the system-load, burdens the codecs and creates interference (Moiré)• Speaking with a normal tone of voice suffices for understandable communication.• Body language (facial-expression and gestures) plays an important roll in setting the atmosphere of the video

conference.• Allow for possible time delays in the transmission.• When you look at the monitor your partner has the feeling that you are looking passed him.• Give warning before changing screens (e.g. posting an image, presentation) and avoid topic changes and changes

to their sequence.• Limit side conversations – and determine if you really want the far end to hear what you are saying. • PLEASE - Mute your microphone when you are not speaking! • Do not talk at the same time. Decide on a hand signal to show that you have something to say.• Do not tap pens or rustle papers near the microphones - the far side can hear this and it is distracting during a

meeting.• Share content appropriately - studies show video conference participants have respond favorably to a ration of

people 80% of the time and content 20%.• Long video conferences should be broken up into smaller ones that last no longer than an hour.• Ensure that the video conference is really shut down when the discussion is over.• Use icons to facilitate non verbal communication. They help to moderate a VC in a more efficient way.

Create your own icons or use the one‘s bellow.

“I DISAGREE WITH WHAT IS BEING SAID”ELOPE5 VC NON-VERBAL COMMUNICATION SIGNS

“I AGREE WITH WHAT IS BEING SAID”ELOPE5 VC NON-VERBAL COMMUNICATION SIGNS

?“I DON’T UNDERSTAND, PLEASE EXPLAIN MORE / BETTER”

ELOPE5 VC NON-VERBAL COMMUNICATION SIGNS“LET’S MOVE FASTER, WE’RE RUNNING OUT OF TIME”

ELOPE5 VC NON-VERBAL COMMUNICATION SIGNS

N“I WOULD LIKE TO SHARE A BRILLIANT IDEA”

ELOPE5 VC NON-VERBAL COMMUNICATION SIGNS“I AM LOST / WE’RE GOING ADRIFT”

ELOPE5 VC NON-VERBAL COMMUNICATION SIGNS“I WOULD LIKE TO SAY SOMETHING”

ELOPE5 VC NON-VERBAL COMMUNICATION SIGNS“LET’S MOVE ON TO THE NEXT POINT”

ELOPE5 VC NON-VERBAL COMMUNICATION SIGNS


Appendices

> Video Conferencing Tech Facts

Protocols H.320 (via Gateway) H.323

Gatekeeper-IP 129.132.183.174

Web Interface https://vcmeeting.ethz.chWeb Interface for Mac https://vcmeetingbeta.ethz.ch

ISDN-Gateway# 0041(0)43 2448930 (Bonding up to 384 kB/s) (call in number)

Phone number only during conference time: +41 (0) 34 426 43 63 +41 (0) 34 426 42 44 (VC)

Conference numbers

Name Meeting ID

Main VC-Roomelope classroom 670564624406

Team VC-Roomselope_Bernstein 67600103 elope_Marie Curie 67600104 elope_Da Vinci 67600105 elope_Fibonacci 67600106 elope_Galilei 67600107

EmergencyISDN Dial-In 0041 43 2448930 + <Meeting ID> + # Dial-in for phone - audio only!

> elope 5 BlogAccount per team will be set up.

> elope 5 Data Sharing Data Sharing by Dropboxwww.dropbox.comAccount per team will be set up.

> Useful links and toolswww.issuu.com share and publish documentations www.vimeo.com share and publish movieswww.mindmeister.com mind mappingwww.prezi.com presentation tool


IV Bibliography (selection)

Learning Environments:

BOUCHLAGHEM Dino, Collaborative Working Construction, Spon Press 2012

JONES Garrick, Learning Environments - Innovative Workspaces for the 21st Century, in Developing Leaders, Issue 5:2011, www.iedp.com

KRAUEL Jacobo & BROTO Carles, Today’s educational Facilities, Links 2010

Transdisciplinarity:

MILLER Christine: Lessons learned and future directions: designing for multidisiplinarity in collaborative innovation networks (COINs) Int. J. Organisational Design and Engineering, Issue 06.03.2012

Ed.: PLATTNER H., MEINEL C., LEIFER L., Design Thinking Understand - Improve - Apply, Springer Heidelberg 2011

Cologne:

Ed.: Architektur Forum Rheinland E.V., Kölner Stadtbaumeister und die Entwicklung der städtischen Baubehörde seit 1821, Kölnisches Stadt Museum 2007

Ed.: BAUWENS-ADENAUER Paul, SOÉNIUS Ulrich S., Der Masterplan für Köln – Albert Speers Vision für die Innen-stadt von Köln, Greven Verlag Köln 2009

Ed.: STREITBERGER Bernd, MÜLLER Anne Luise, Rechtsrheinische Perspektiven, Stadtplanung und Städtebau im postindustriellen Köln 1990 bis 2030, DOM publishers Berlin 2011

Ed.: Bau- und Liegenschaftsbetriebe NRW, IWZ Teilneubau Ingenieurwissenschaftliches Zentrum - Auslobung zum zweiphasigen Wettbewerb nach RAW 2004, Köln / Düsseldorf 2012

Ed.: METZNER Joachim Präsident der Fachhochschule Köln, Hochschulentwicklungsplan - Strategischer Rahmen-plan 2020, Juni 2011

Ed.: Fachhochschule Köln, Projekt-Profil-Definition, PPD zum Campus Domgärten für die Fachhochschule Köln, No-vember 2009

Architecture:

Books BRAUN Hardo, GRÖMLING Dieter, Entwurfsatlas Forschungs- und Technologiebau, Birkhäuser 2005

DELLA CASA Francesco and Eugène, Rolex Learning Center, EPFL Press 2010

Ed.: EHMANN Sven, BORGES Sofia, KLANTEN Robert, Learn for Life - New Architecture for New Learning, Ge-stalten Verlag 2012

Ed.: HAAR, Sharon The City as Campus – Urbanism and higher education in Chicago, University of Minnesota Press 2011

Ed.: HOEGER Kerstin, CHRISTIAANSE Kees, Campus and the City – Urban Design for the Knowledge Society, gta Veralg 2007

LEE Katy, University Architecture, Design Media Publishing Limited 2010

MITCHELL William J., Imagining MIT - Designing a Campus for the Twenty-First Century, The MIT Press 2007

Ed.: TU Delft, Faculty of Architecture, Buidling for Bouwkunde - Open to Ideas, Open International Ideas Competition and Think Tank, TU Delft, Faculty of Architecture 2009

Ed.: WILKINSON EYRE Architects, Tectonics: a building for Earth Sciences at Oxford, Black dog publishing 2011


Appendices

PeriodicalsMARCHAND Bruno, La situation en Suisse romande dans les années soixante : inflexions

(Das) Werk: Band 57 (1970), Universitätsplanung in der Schweiz

Hochparterre: Zeitschrift für Architektur und Design, Vol.20 (2007) BRÜGGER F. , COCCHI G., LÜSCHER R. , Cité universitaire de Lausanne-Dorigny : Plan directeur de l’Université cantonale, Persistenter Link: http://dx.doi.org/10.5169/seals-82160, HÖNIG Roderick. Eine Hochschule sucht ihr Zentrum, Persistenter Link: http://dx.doi.org/10.5169/seals-123164,

vers l’architecture du territoire, Persistenter Link: http://dx.doi.org/10.5169/seals-65153

Werk, Bauen + Wohnen [Schweizer Ausgabe], Vol.87 (2000)

Werk, Bauen + Wohnen [Schweizer Ausgabe], Vol.92 (2005) MALFROY Sylvain and ZIERAU Frank, Der Traum von der Stadt des Wissens: ETHZ und EPFL enthüllen ihre projets présidentiels, Persistenter Link: http://dx.doi.org/10.5169/seals-68437,

Landscape Architecture

BLAISSE Petra, « Le paysage comme outil » propos recueillis par Iwan Strauen, A+, p 70-78

DESVIGNE Michel, avec une préface de James Corner & contribution de Gilles A. Tiberghien. Natures intermédiaires : les paysages, Basel, Birkhäuser, 2009.

FORESTIER Jean Claude Nicolas; prés. par LECLERC Bénédicte... [et al.]; notes critiques par IMBERT Dorothée... [et al.], Grandes villes et systèmes de parcs ; suivi de deux mémoires sur les villes impériales du Maroc et sur Buenos-Aires, Paris, Editions Norma, cop. 1997.

JAKOB Michael, ASP Atelier Stern und Partner Architecture du Paysage, éditions Infolio, 2012.

MAROT Sébastien « l’Alternative du Paysage », Le Visiteur, n°1, 1995.

Ed. WALDHEIM Charles, The landscape urbanism reader , New York, N.Y., Princeton Architectural Press, 2006.

Construction Management:

COOKE Brian, WILLIAMS Peter: Construction planning, programming, and control, 2. Auflage, Oxford, UK , Malden, MA : Blackwell Pub., 2004

HALPIN Daniel W.,Construction management, 3. Auflage, Hoboken, NJ : Wiley, 2006

LEVY Sidney M. , Project management in construction, 6. Auflage New York, NY [u.a.] : McGraw-Hill, 2012

PRATT David J., Fundamentals of construction estimating, 3. Auflage Clifton Park, NY: Delmar Cengage Learning, 2011

Building Technologies

DIN 18599 Teile 1 + 2 Energetische Bewertung von Gebäuden, Beuth-Verlag 2011/12

bine Informationsdienst, Schriftenreihe Regenerative Energien + Projektinfos, webpage: www.bine.info

EnEV - Energieeinsparverordnung (2009 und Entwurf 2012) + EEWärmeG- Erneuerbare Energien und Wärmegesetz 2011 www.enev-online.org


Map of Cologne

Cologne University of Applied Sciences

Deutz Workspace

Youth Hostel Riehl

V Miscellaneous | Helpful Information

Bürgerhaus Stollwerck

Team Spirit Wednesday


Youth Hostel Cologne Riehl DJH Jugendherberge Köln-Riehlwww.koeln-riehl.jugendherberge.deAn der Schanz 14Köln, Germany+49 (0) 221 9765130

Workspace Cologne University of Applied Sciences - Campus Deutz IWZ Ingenieurswissenschaftliches Zentrumwww.fh-koeln.chBetzdorfer Straße 250679 KölnPhone: +49(0)221 8275-0Phone: +49(0)221 8275-2591 (Secretary Mrs Schmitz)

Room HW-2-78

Team Spirit Workshop Wednesday Ocotber 10th 2012 9am-11amhttp://www.buergerhaus-stollwerck.info/11.htmlBürgerhaus StollwerckDreikönigenstr. 23, 50678 Köln

Appendices


Map Rail Service

Rhein

Rhein

Rhein

Rhein

RB 38

RB 38

RB 24

RB 24MRB 26

RB 48

MRB 26RB 48

RB 38

RB 24, 48MRB 26

RB 24, 48MRB 26

RB 27, 38RB 27

RB 27

RB 25

RE 8

RE 7

RE 7

RE 1, 9

RE 8

RE 5

RE 5RE 8

RE 9

RE 7

RE5,12, 22

RE 5, 12, 22

RE 12, 22

RE 12, 22

RE 1, 8, 9

RE 1, 5

RE1,5

RE 5 RE 7RE 1 RB 48

RB 48

RB 48RE 7

RE 7

RB 27

RB 27

RE 8

RE 8

RE 8

RE 9

RB 27RE 9

Neuss

DüsseldorfNeuss

12

12

S11

S12(S13)

(S13)S12

(S13)S12

(S13)S12

7

9

13

15

S11S 6

318

S11

S11

4

S 6

S 6

S12,13

S13

S 6

Mönchengladbach

RB 25

RB 25

RB 25

1813

12

43

3

3 4

17

17

9

1

9

13

16

16

18

7

13

134

9

4

3

1

11

915

43

43

S13

15

1813

12

1512

18

13

13

7

S12

S13

S13

1

S13

1 9

1512

1816

16

5

179

5

3

Bahnen in Köln

RE 1, 9 AachenDüren

5

4 3

16

Neuss / Düsseldorf

15

15

S11

S11

S11

5

RE 12, 22

MRB 26RB 24, 38

7

StadtgrenzeStadtgebiet

MRBRBRE

Verkehrsverbund Rhein-Sieg GmbH

Stand: April 2012

C

S-Bahn

Regionalzüge

P+R-Platz

außer zu den Linien13 u. 16

stufenfreier Zugangzu allen Linien

DB - Fernverkehr

Stadtbahn

S12

1516

Barbarossaplatz

Eifelstr.

Eifel-platzSülzburg-

str.

Weißhausstr.

Arnulfstr.

Eifelwall

5

KölnHbf

Dom/ Hbf

18

18

16

12

Weinsbergstr. / Gürtel

Nußbaumerstr.Subbelrather Str. / Gürtel

Leyendecker-str.

Friesenplatz

Oskar-Jäger-Str./ Gürtel Hans-Böckler-Platz

/ Bf West

K-Müngersdorf/ Technologiepark

Körnerstr.

Piusstr.

Rösrath-Stümpen

Rösrath Hoffnungsthal

Kalk Kap

elle

Fuldaer S

tr.

Höhenberg

Fran

kfurte

r Str.

Kalker

Friedhof

Merheim

Flehbac

hstr.

Brück M

ausp

fad

Lustheid

e

Refrath

Kippekau

sen

Franke

nforst

Neuen

weg

Kölner Str.

Im Hoppen

kamp

Autobahn

Steinweg

Porzer S

tr.

Rath-H

eumar

Röttgen

sweg

Deutzer Freiheit

Suevenstr.

K-Lövenich

Frechen-Königsdorf

Kalk Post

KTrimbornstr.

KFrankfurter Str.

Vingst

Schönhauser Str.

BayenthalgürtelChlodwig-

platz

Godorf

WesselingNord

Wesseling

Wesseling Süd

Urfeld

Widdig

Spich

RodenkirchenSiegstr.

Michaelshoven

Ostheim

Ebertplatz

BreslauerPlatz / Hbf

Zoo / Flora

Lohsestr.

Florastr.

Neusser Str. / Gürtel

Mollwitzstr.

Scheibenstr.

GeestemünderStr.

Fordwerke Süd

Fordwerke Mitte

Merkenich Mitte

Fordwerke Nord

AltonaerPlatz

K Geldernstr. /Parkgürtel

Merkenich

Niehl

ÄußereKanalstr.

Pulheim

Wolffsohnstr.

Westfriedhof

Reichensperger- platz

KinderkrankenhausBocklemünd

Akazienweg

Amsterdamer Str. / Gürtel

K-Nippes

EscherStr.

MengenichOllenhauerring

Schaffrathsgasse

Boltenstern-str.

Wilhelm-Sollmann-Str.

Keupstr.

Von-Sparr-Str.

Opladen

Leichlingen

K-Stammheim

Bayerwerk

LEV Mitte

LEV-Rheindorf

LEV-SchlebuschLEV-Küppersteg

Slabystr.

Schlebusch

K-Buchforst

Buchforst Waldecker Str.

BuchheimFrankfurter Str.

Wichheimer Str.

Koeln- messe

HolweideVischeringstr.

Stegerwald- siedlung

Grünstr.BuchheimHerler Str.

K-Holweide

MülheimWiener Platz

BergischGladbach

MülheimBerliner Str.

Deutz-Kalker Bad(Fachhochschule)

(Kranke

nhaus H

olweid

e)

Maria-Himmelfahrt-

Str.

Neufel

der Str.

Dellbrück

Mau

spfad

Dellbrück

Hauptst

r.

DuckterathK-Dellbrück

Christophstr. / Mediapark

Severinstr.

Severinsbrücke

Sülzgürtel

Heinrich-Lübke-Ufer

SürthGottesweg

Zollstockgürtel

Ubierring

Heumarkt

Appellhofplatz / Breite Str.

Appellhofplatz / Zeughaus Bensberg

Königsforst

Mauritiuskirche

ZülpicherPlatz

Klettenbergpark

Efferen

Kiebitzweg

Weyertal

Gleueler Str./ Gürtel

Mommsen-str.

Stüttgenhof

Marsdorf

HausVorst

FrechenBahnhof

Frechen

Kirche

Frechen

Rathau

s

Mühlengas

se

Dürener Str./ Gürtel

Wüllner-str.

Zülpicher Str./ Gürtel

Universitäts-str.

Melaten Moltke- str.

Maar-weg

Eupener

Str.

Alter M

ilitärr

ing

Rheinen

ergie-

Stadion

Mohnweg

Bahnstr

.

Weiden

Schulst

r.

Weiden

Zentru

m

Junke

rsdorf

Frechen-Benzelrath

Brühl-VochemBrühl Nord

Brühl Mitte

Brahmsstr.Clar

enbac

hstift

Kierberg

Rudolf- platz

KölnWest

Berrenrather Str. / Gürtel

Hürth-Hermülheim

Fischenich

Dasselstr. / Bf Süd Köln

Süd

EuskirchenerStr.

Sülz Hermeskeiler Platz

Aachener Str. / Gürtel

Universität

Lindenburg(Universitätsklinik)

BrühlBrühl Süd

Brühl-BadorfErftstadt

Neumarkt

K Messe/ Deutz

K Messe/ Deutz

Hürth-Kalscheuren

Bf Deutz/ Messe

Poststr.

Bf Deutz /LANXESS arena

Am Emberg

Leuchterstr.

Odenthaler Str.

Im Weidenbruch

Porz Markt

DrehbrückePoller Kirchweg

Raiffeisenstr.Poll Salmstr.

Baumschulenweg

Kölner Str.Westhoven

Berliner Str.

Gilgaustr.Ensen

Kloster

Rosenhügel

Zündorf

Porz Steinstr.K

Steinstr. Köln / BonnFlughafen

KAirport -

Businesspark

Porz-Wahn

Porz

Troisdorf

DüsseldorfWuppertalSolingen

nur<—

K-WeidenWest

Liebigstr.

Gutenberg- str.

Thielenbruch

Horrem

K Hansaring

Nesselrodestr.

NiehlSebastianstr.

Dormagen Bayerwerk

Dormagen

K- Worringen

Herforder Str.

Chorweiler

Heimersdorf

K-Chorweiler

K-Blumenberg

K-Chorweiler Nord

K Volkhovener Weg

LongericherStr. K-

LongerichMeerfeld-

str.LongerichFriedhof

K-Mülheim

BfMülheimMargaretastr.

Rektor-Klein-Str.

Iltisstr.Lenauplatz

SparkasseAm Butzweilerhof

IKEA Am Butzweilerhof Alter Flughafen

Butzweilerhof

5

Venloer Str./ Gürtel

K-Ehrenfeld

ZollstockSüdfriedhof

Ulre-pforte

Pohligstr.

Herthastr.

1618EuskirchenGerolstein Bonn

BonnRemagen

BonnBad Godesberg

SiegburgAu (Sieg)

—>außer S 12

GummersbachMarienheide

Bonn-BeuelNeuwied

Partner im

[email protected]

Konzeption / Gestaltung

Felderstr. 106 51 371 LeverkusenFon: 0214 / 24 55 8 Fax: 24 28 4

Die Schlaue Nummerfür Bus und Bahn:

(0 180 3) 50 40 30

www.vrsinfo.dewww.kvb-koeln.de

Information

9 Cent/Min. aus dem dt. Festnetz,Mobilfunk max. 42 Cent/Min.

2012


Public Transportation

www.bahn.de (Train)www.kvb-koeln.de (Tram/Subway/Bus)http://auskunft.kvb-koeln.de (Navigationservice)

Main Station to YH Riehl Boltensternstrasse (ca. 8min one way)

Start: KÖLN, Dom/Hbf (U) (Ri. Ebertplatz) Linie 18 to KÖLN, Thielenbruch or KÖLN, Buchheim Herler StrasseDestination: KÖLN, Boltensternstrasse

back

Start: KÖLN, Boltensternstrasse Linie 18 to KÖLN, Klettenbergpark or BONN, Bonn Hauptbahnhof (U)Destination: KÖLN, Dom/Hbf (U)

YH Hostel Riehl to FH Cologne (ca. 27 min one way)

Start: YH Riehl, Boltensternstrasse until KÖLN, Neumarkt (Stadtb.) Line 18 to BRÜHL, Bonn HBF or KÖLN, Klettenbergpark Change: KÖLN, Neumarkt (Stadtb.) Line 1 or 9 to KÖLN,Brück Mauspfad, KÖLN, KönigsforstDestination: KÖLN, Deutz-Kalker Bad

back

Start: KÖLN, Deutz-Kalker Bad until KÖLN,Neumarkt (Stadtb.) Line 1 or 9 to KÖLN, Weiden West, KÖLN, Sülz, Hermeskeiler PlatzChange: KÖLN, Neumarkt (Stadtb.) Line 18 to KÖLN,Thielenbruch, KÖLN,Buchheim, Herler StrasseDestination: YH Riehl Boltensternstrasse

Main Staion to Airport (one way app. 15 min)

Start: KÖLN, Main Station S13 to TROISDORF,Troisdorf Bf or RE8 KOBLENZ,Koblenz HbfDestination: KÖLN,Köln/Bonn Flughafen

back

Start: KÖLN,Köln/Bonn Flughafen S13 to KÖLN,Hansaring or RE8 MÖNCHENGLADBACH,Mönchengladbach HbfDestination: KÖLN, Main Station


Emergency Numbers GermanyPolice 110 Ambulance & Fire Service 112

elope number (24h) +41 79 382 66 27 (Swiss Mobile Phone) German Mobile Phone Number will be set up Numbers are only operational during the Physical Kick of in Cologne, Germany!

Embassies

Amerikanisches Generalkonsulatwww.german.duesseldorf.usconsulate.govWilli-Becker-Allee 10 40227 Düsseldorf, Deutschland+49 (0) 211 78 88 92 7 Honorarkonsulat der Vereinigten Mexikanischen Staatenwww.consulmexdus.com c/o Messe Düsseldorf GmbH, Stockumer Kirchstraße 61, 40474 Düsseldorf+49 (0) 211 45 60-103 / 104

Consolato Generale d‘Italiawww.conscolonia.esteri.itUniversitätsstraße 81 50931 Köln, Deutschland+49 (0) 221 40 087-0

Schweizerisches Konsulat www.eda.admin.chKasernenstrasse 40, 40213 Düsseldorf, Deutschland+49 (0) 211 569 40 220 Ambassade de Francewww.ambafrance-de.org/-Dusseldorf-Martin Luther Platz 26, 40212 DüsseldorfTél. +49 (0) 211 - 828546 0


Appendices

Notes

Lead elope and CoordinationBern University of Applied SciencesArchitecture, Wood and Civil EngineeringPestalozzistrasse 20, P.O. Box 1058CH-3401 Burgdorf, SwitzerlandPhone +41 34 426 41 74 Fax +41 34 426 43 94

Mail to [email protected] www.ahb.bfh.ch/elope

Scopia https://vcmeeting.ethz.ch (for PC) https://vcmeetingbeta.ethz.ch (for Mac) 670564624406 (meeting ID for elope Classroom)

elope 5Learning Environments - Campus CologneProject Fall 2012/13

elope alliance Partners

Bauhaus-University Weimar, GermanyConstruction Engineering and Managementwww.uni-weimar.de

Bern University of Applied Sciences, SwitzerlandSocial Scienceswww.soziale-arbeit.bfh.ch

Architecture www.jointmaster.ch

ITESM Campus Querétaro, MexicoInstituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterreywww.itesm.edu

Politecnico di Milano Architecturewww.polimi.it

Polytech Marseille Civil Engineeringwww.polytech-marseille.fr

Stanford University California, USA Environmental Engineering & Architecturewww.stanford.edu

University of Applied Sciences Western Switzerland, HES - SOHaute Ecole de Paysage d‘Ingénierie et d‘Architecture - HEPIA www.hes-so.ch

Stakeholders & Partners

Public building and real-estate management company BLBwww.blb.nrw.de/BLB_Hauptauftritt/index.php

Urban Planing Authority of the City of Colognewww.stadt-koeln.de/4/stadtplanung/

UAS-Department of Technical Building Managementwww.fh-koeln.de

OrganizationCologne University of Applied Sciences, GermanyInstitut für technische Gebäudeausrüstung | www.f09.fh-koeln.deBetzdorfer Straße 2, 50679 Cologne GERPhone: +49(0)221 8275-0 Phone: +49(0)221 8275-2591

elope5_reader

Documents

academic learning

basic data university

cologne ger

alliance partners

planning process

planning risks

project elope5

basic background information