enabling digital learning physical and virtual environments hanizam sulaiman utm centre for ict...
TRANSCRIPT
ENABLING DIGITAL LEARNINGPhysical and Virtual Environments
HANIZAM SULAIMANUTM Centre for ICT
Download slides here http://bit.ly/1gqG577
Contents• Digital Learning• Characteristics• Main enablers
• Learning Environment• The expectations• The provisioning
• Takeaways• What possible now
Download slides here http://bit.ly/1gqG577
Digital Learning
• Definition– learning facilitated by technology that
gives some element of control over time, place, path and/or pace to learners/students.• any time• any place• own style• own pace
Definition from Digital Learning Now!
“PERSONAL LEARNING PREFERENCES”
“PERSONAL LEARNING PREFERENCES”
Download slides here http://bit.ly/1gqG577
4
6 Digital Learning Characteristics
Analog Digital
Tethered Mobile
Isolated Connected
Generic Personal
Consumption Creating
Closed Open
Source: David Wiley (2008): Openness and the disaggregated future of higher education
15 October 2010
Download slides here http://bit.ly/1gqG577
Digital Native vs. Digital Literate
• Digital literacy – effective acquisition and utilization of knowledge using 21st century digital technology
• Studies by Kennedy et al., 2008 and Ladbrook & Probert, 2011 have shown that digital natives are not digital literates
• New skills – digital fluency
Download slides here http://bit.ly/1gqG577
Roles of ICT• Enabling learners – to become drivers of their own learning in a
connected environment, – to become creators and contributors of
knowledge
• Key Enablersi. Access to learning resources, communication
and collaborative tools ii.High speed connectioniii.Authoring tools – hard and software
Download slides here http://bit.ly/1gqG577
Digital Learning Environment
Download slides here http://bit.ly/1gqG577
Dig
ital L
earn
ing
Land
scap
e
Cam
pus
Life
Dig
ital
Land
scap
e
What the students expect?- Studies and reports by
EducauseStudyBlueGartnerIDCPew InternetMalaysia’s MCMC
Download slides here http://bit.ly/1gqG577
Educause Study, Feb 2013
• Ubiquitous Wireless is expected–6 out of 10 students own smart
phones–80% had broadband at home–mainly for learning,
communication and entertainment
Download slides here http://bit.ly/1gqG577
StudyBlue Study 2011
• Ubiquitous and instantaneous access to knowledge resources is critical for best possible learning experience– Smartphone users study 40 mins more per
week– Study while on the go, in the bus, waiting– 50% (out of 1 million) study while going to
bed, waking up or staying in line– 19% study in the bathroom
Download slides here http://bit.ly/1gqG577
Pew Internet Study, 2013
• Age 18-29 : 95% have access to broadband (home + smartphone)
• 80% at home• 80% smartphone
• Mass adoption of teleconferencing and distance learning by 2020
• 57% of American adults use their cell phone to go online.
• 21% of cell phone owners say they mostly access the internet using their phone.
http://pewinternet.org/Infographics/2013/How-Americans-go-online.aspx
Gartner, 2013
•Massive Open Online Courses (Cousera, edX, Udacity) spectrums now include degrees, credits, credentials and knowledge•MOOCs are favoured due to economic pressure
IDC Study, 2013
• 29.1% sales growth of connected device
• 78.4% tablets (2011 to 2012 sales)– 128 mil tablets
• 27.1% smartphone– 918 mil units
• PC desktops and portables sales declined
Educause Study, 2012
Source: http://educause.edu/ecar-student-2012
Educause Study, 2012
Source: http://educause.edu/ecar-student-2012
• Blending modalities and engaging learners is a winning combination.– Students expect their instructors to use technology to
engage them in the learning process
• The time has come to move beyond thinking about individual platforms and devices. – Students want to access academic progress information
and course material via their mobile devices
• Students believe technology is critical to academic success and future accomplishments.
• Students want multiple communication options for different purposes and audiences. – use social networks for interacting with friends more than
for academic communication. – Use e-mail, face-to-face interaction, and using the
course/learning management system for academic matters
Malaysia Digital Outlook• Population - 29.71 mil• Households - 6,895,000• Broadband penetration rate
– 22.3 per 100 inhabitants– 66.8 per 100 households
• KL, Putrajaya, Penang > 80% (at par USA)• Sabah, Sarawak, Kedah 54 to 56%• Kelantan 43%• Urban 82.2% Rural 17.8% (2011)
– 1.74 million non-households subscriptions– 4,210 villages with wifi hotspots– 34,372 urban wifi hotspots
Source: MCMC Communications and Multimedia Pocket Book of Statistics Q2 2013
Source: MCMC Communications and Multimedia Pocket Book of Statistics Q2 2013
Cellular Telephone Subscriptions
• Total 42.6 million (Q2 2013)– Postpaid 7.5 mil– Prepaid 35 mil– Total rate 143.4 per 100 inhabitants
Source: MCMC Communications and Multimedia Pocket Book of Statistics Q2 2013
So what do they want?• Ubiquitous Learning– Study in bed, bathroom, while in line waiting, during
exercise (?)– Expect connections all the time, using smartphone to
access LMS and materials• Wifi hotspots• 3G/4G coverage
– Gen Wifi (?)
• Personal space/ environment– Separate communication channel for academic and
social networks– Use of OER, edu games (MOOCs ?)– Blended learning and engagement
Roles of ICT• Enabling learners – to become drivers of their own learning in a
connected environment, – to become creators and contributors of
knowledge
• Key Enablersi. Access to learning resources, communication
and collaborative tools ii.High speed connectioniii.Authoring tools – hard and software
Key challenges/issues to great student learning experience
Download slides here http://bit.ly/1gqG577
Issue #1: OER• Open educational resources are media rich
learning objects/materials, bandwidth hungry– Eg. streaming videos, SCORM packages– Smartphone requires wireless
• Wifi hotspots, 3G or 4G• best effort type of connections
– Good HD streaming requires min 512 kbps at all time– More users connecting to the wifi access point,
negative effects on the speed• Loss of connection or jagged video streams
• CDN unicast for VOD is too costly and out or reach for many– Over wifi ?
Issue #2: Small smart devices• Multiple device types, own devices• Increasing popularity for internet access due to
cheaper android devices– Unlike iOS, Androids older devices locked at outdated
versions - firmware not supported (?)• No Security patches
• Wifi / Wireless LAN is the primary access layer– AP must BYOD-ready
• BYOD policy must be in placed to balance the need for security and control with enabling ubiquitous learning environment
• QoS for video streaming increases access contention ratio. Bandwidth is still expansive
Issue #3: Learning Contents• Flash based LO is no longer supported in Android
4.4 (Apple iOS dropped support for Flash since its inception)
– Different development for different device type is not sustainable. Different OS, iOS vs Android?
• Multi devices, multi screen sizes, multi OSes (desktop, notebook, iPad, iPhone, Galaxy etc).– LMS’s web not shown properly on small, low resolution
screens– Different apps for different OSes. Not sustainable.– Developers’ headache?
• SCORM’s incompatibility with HTML5, the new multiple devices web coding
Issue #4: Apple vs. Samsung
• Which one to start first? Mobile developers’ nightmare?
• Win 8.1?
The Takeaways
Download slides here http://bit.ly/1gqG577
The Solutions are here, or soon.1. Video streaming/VOD over best effort networks like wifi
and 3G is now possible using Octoshape Infinite HD multicast– TM IPTV, 1MalaysiaTV, UTM-TV
2. New wifi standards, the IEEE802.11n and 802.11ac offer 450 Mbps to 1.5 Gbps– Now possible to set QoS without effecting too much on
contention ratio
3. LTE 4G is here to complement Wimax “4G”. More spectrums, more capacity, more coverage for true ubiquitous access via smartphones. Increases speed from typical 2 Mbps to 300 Mbps (theoretical).– QoS is still not possible (best effort) but not an issue, for now.
http://www.octoshape.com/showcase/vod/#
Different learner’s experience with different devices
Solution: HTML5
4. HTML5 gives us an environment that runs across mobiles and laptops
5. New SCORM called Tin Pan, is now compatible with HTML5
http://www.netexcompany.com/whitepapers/meeting-the-challenge-of-multi-device-m-learning/
BYOD Mobile Security
• Uncharted territory like the wild wild west• Blackberry and iOS (jailed) are enterprise ready.
Enterprise AV for iOS is available • Androids are wild west and iOS is Legoland.
Apps can be uploaded to the devices from numerous sources.
• U.S. Government has recently Issued warning about security on Android phones• Android accounts for 79 percent of mobile
malware, while Apple’s iOS accounts for 0.7 percent
• Use of BYOD-ready access points is a must
http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/08/28/u-s-government-issues-warning-about-security-on-android-phones/?_r=0
UTM JB Campus Digital Health
• 2 Gbps internet gateways– 1 Gbps for Library, Faculty and Admin buildings– 1 Gbps for 17 residential colleges on top of 400 Mbps
microwave for Wimax
• Wifi 802.11n is being deployed to residential colleges to guarantee minimum 512kbps downlink suitable for video streaming (flipped classroom ready)– Over 2,500 access points for 20,000 students– Aruba AP, with leading security and BYOD-ready – 4G Wimax and giganet backhaul
• Wimax 4G dongles will be deployed to non-resident PG students to enable in-campus learning experience
• Wimax 4G coverage 80% geographically• LTE 4G is being deployed with >80%
coverage with much larger capacity– 2 LTE providers
• 3G data services are offered by all operators• 100 Mbps Metro E from UTMKL to JB
Campus– 400 Mbps ++ internet gateway– 100% Wimax 4G coverage
Hanizam [email protected]/in/hanizam/www.cheme.utm.my/staff/hanizam
http://www.utm.my/ecotourism/
Download slides here at http://bit.ly/1gqG577
Wimax vs LTE vs HSPA+
• HSPA+ theoretical peak data rates of 42Mbps DL and 23 Mbps UL.
• WiMAX theoretical peak data rates of 75Mbps DL and 30Mbps UL.
• LTE theoretical peak data rates of 300Mbps DL and 75 Mbps UL.