end of school year school monitoring and evaluation (sm&e ...€¦ · end of school year school...
TRANSCRIPT
End of School Year School Monitoring and Evaluation (SM&E) Template
School Year 2019–2020
to gather the data for discussion during the SMEA and as input to the First Quarter 2020 Division Monitoring and Evaluation (DM&E)
Name of School : ____________________________________________________ District : ________________________________________________
Name of School Head : ____________________________________________________
Position/Designation (Put a check mark whichever is applicable) ___ Principal II ___ Head Teacher III
___ Principal I ___ Head Teacher II
___ Master Teacher II ___ Head Teacher I
___ Master Teacher I ___ Teacher-in-Charge
___ Teacher III
___ Teacher II
___ Teacher I
Instruction: Provide the necessary data/information. Do not alter any of the column titles nor any of the row titles.
I. Performance of Learners as to Attendance Rate and Absenteeism Rate (School Year 2019–2020)
Grade Level
Performance of Learners
Reasons of Absenteeism (if the school has
absentee learners)
(Per Grade Level)
Intervention/s implemented to
Address Absenteeism (if the school
has absentee learners)
(Per Grade Level)
Average
Attendance
Rate
Average
Absenteeism
Rate
Kindergarten
Grade 1/Grade 7
Grade 2/Grade 8
Grade 3/Grade 9
Grade 4/Grade 10
Grade 5/Grade 11
Grade 6/Grade 12
II. Performance of Learners as to Proficiency Level by Subject Area by Grade Level by Sex [Kindergarten to Grade 6 and Grade 7 to Grade
10] (School Year 2019–2020)
Total No. of Enrolled : ______ broken down as follows: ______ Male ______ Female
A. Male Learners
1. Performance of Male Learners in Kindergarten to Grade 3 on MTB-MLE
Grade Level
No. of Male Learners per Proficiency Level by Subject Area by Grade Level
Literacy
T
Numeracy
T
Sensory
Perceptual T
MTB-MLE
T
O
VS
S
FS
DN
ME
O
VS
S
FS
DN
ME
O
VS
S
FS
DN
ME
O
VS
S
FS
Kindergarten
Grade 1
Grade 2
Grade 3
Legend : O (Outstanding) VS (Very Satisfactory) S (Satisfactory) FS (Fairly Satisfactory) DNME (Did Not Meet Expectation)
T (Total)
Justification why a discrepancy or discrepancies in the Total/s viz-a-vis Total No. of Enrolled (if any). __________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________.
2. Performance of Male Learners in Grade 1 to Grade 6/Grade 7 to Grade 10 by Subject Area
Grade Level
No. of Male Learners per Proficiency Level by Subject Area by Grade Level
(Fill-out only the subject area columns for a particular grade level)
English
T
Filipino
T
Math
T
Science
T
EsP
T
AP
T
TLE
T
MAPEH/
PEHM
T
O
VS
S
FS
DN
ME
O
VS
S
FS
DN
ME
O
VS
S
FS
DN
ME
O
VS
S
FS
DN
ME
O
VS
S
FS
DN
ME
O
VS
S
FS
DN
ME
O
VS
S
FS
DN
ME
O
VS
S
FS
DN
ME
Grade 1/Grade 7
Grade 2/Grade 8
Grade 3/Grade 9
Grade 4/Grade 10
Grade 5
Grade 6
Total
Legend : O (Outstanding) VS (Very Satisfactory) S (Satisfactory) FS (Fairly Satisfactory) DNME (Did Not Meet Expectation)
T (Total)
Justification why a discrepancy or discrepancies in the Total/s viz-a-vis Total No. of Enrolled (if any). __________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________.
B. Female Learners
1. Performance of Female Learners in Kindergarten to Grade 3 on MTB-MLE
Grade Level
No. of Female Learners per Proficiency Level by Subject Area by Grade Level
Literacy
T
Numeracy
T
Sensory
Perceptual T
MTB-MLE
T O
VS
S
FS
DN
ME
O
VS
S
FS
DN
ME
O
VS
S
FS
DN
ME
O
VS
S
FS
Kindergarten
Grade 1
Grade 2
Grade 3
2. Performance of Female Learners in Grade 1 to Grade 6/Grade 7 to Grade 10 by Subject Area
Grade Level
No. of Female Learners Per Proficiency Level by Subject Area by Grade Level
English
T
Filipino
T
Math
T
Science
T
EsP
T
AP
T
TLE
T
MAPEH/
PEHM
T
O
VS
S
FS
DN
ME
O
VS
S
FS
DN
ME
O
VS
S
FS
DN
ME
O
VS
S
FS
DN
ME
O
VS
S
FS
DN
ME
O
VS
S
FS
DN
ME
O
VS
S
FS
DN
ME
O
VS
S
FS
DN
ME
Grade 1/Grade 7
Grade 2/Grade 8
Grade 3/Grade 9
Grade 4/Grade 10
Grade 5
Grade 6
Total
Legend : O (Outstanding) VS (Very Satisfactory) S (Satisfactory) FS (Fairly Satisfactory) DNME (Did Not Meet Expectation)
T (Total)
Justification why a discrepancy or discrepancies in the Total/s viz-a-vis Total No. of Enrolled (if any). __________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________.
III. A. Learner Status as of End of Semester and as of End of School Year for Senior High School (SY 2019-2020)
Grade Level
End of Semester End of School Year
Complete Incomplete Total Regular Irregular Total
M F T M F T M F T M F T M F T M F T
Grade 11
Track/Strand/Course
Sub-Total
Grade 12
Track/Strand/Course
Sub-Total
Total
Legend: M (Male) F (Female) T (Total)
B. 1. List of Learners with Complete SHS Requirements (SY 2019-2020)
Track & Strand Status Sex
Total Male Female
Learners who completed SHS Program
within 2 SYs or 4 semesters
Learners who completed SHS Program in
more than 2 SYs or 4 semesters
TOTAL
Learners who completed SHS Program
within 2 SYs or 4 semesters
Learners who completed SHS Program in
more than 2 SYs or 4 semesters
TOTAL
Learners who completed SHS Program
within 2 SYs or 4 semesters
Learners who completed SHS Program in
more than 2 SYs or 4 semesters
TOTAL
GRAND TOTAL
B. 2. List of Learners with Complete SHS Requirements (SY 2019-2020)
Track & Strand (as applicable) Status Sex
Total Male Female
National Certificate (NC) III
National Certificate (NC) II
National Certificate (NC) I
Total
National Certificate (NC) III
National Certificate (NC) II
National Certificate (NC) I
Total
National Certificate (NC) III
National Certificate (NC) II
National Certificate (NC) I
Total
Grand Total
IV. Performance of Learners as to Reading Proficiency Level by Grade Level by Sex [Kindergarten to Grade 6 and Grade 7 to Grade 12]
(School Year 2019–2020)
A. Kinder, Grade 1 & 2
Grade Level
Reading Level
Non-Reader Struggling Reader Reader
English Filipino MTB-MLE English Filipino MTBMLE English Filipino MTB-MLE
M F T M F T M F T M F T M F T M F T M F T M F T M F T
Kindergarten
Grade 1
Grade 2
Total
Legend: M (Male) F (Female) T (Total)
B. Grade 3 - 12
Grade Level
Number of Learners under each Reading Proficiency Level (Filipino) Total Grand
Total Non-Reader Frustration Instructional Independent
M F T M F T M F T M F T M F
Grade 3/Grade 7
Grade 4/Grade 8
Grade 5/Grade 9
Grade 6/Grade 10
Grade 11
Grade 12
Total
Grade Level
Number of Learners under each Reading Proficiency Level (English) Total Grand
Total Non-Reader Frustration Instructional Independent
M F T M F T M F T M F T M F
Grade 3/Grade 7
Grade 4/Grade 8
Grade 5/Grade 9
Grade 6/Grade 10
Grade 11
Grade 12
Total
V. Data on the Number of Learners for the Remedial and Advancement Classes During Summer of SY 2019-20
(Based on DepEd Order No. 13, s. 2018)
1. Number of Learners (Grade 4-10) Who Failed in NOT MORE THAN 2 Learning Areas
Grade Level Sex
T Male Female
4/7
5/8
6/9
10
Total
2. Number of Failures Per Subject Area Per Grade
Learning Area (Please specify) Grade 4/7 Grade 5/8 Grade 6/9 Grade 10
M F T M F T M F T M F T
3. Number of SHS Learners Who Failed in Any Learning Area
Learning Area (Please specify) First Semester Second Semester
M F T M F T
4. No. of SHS Learners Who Failed in a Prerequisite Subject
Prerequisite Subject (Please specify) No. of Learners
M F T
5. No. of Grade s 4-12 Learners with Special Education Needs
Grade No. of Learners with Special Educ. Needs
M F T
4/7
5/8
6/9
10
11
12
TOTAL
VI. Learner–Facility/Textbook Ratio (School Year 2019–2020)
A. Elementary and Junior High School
1. Learner–Facility Ratio
School Year
Learner-Facility Ratio
(Specify the ratio in the cells across the specified School Year)
Computer Units Chairs Classroom
Wash Area
(with 10
faucets)
Toilet by Sex
Male Female
2019 – 2020
Issues and
Concerns
2. Learner–Textbook Ratio
Grade Level
Learner–Textbook Ratio by Subject Area by Grade Level
English Filipino Math AP EsP Science TLE MAPEH/
PEHM
Kindergarten
Grade 1/Grade 7
Grade 2/Grade 8
Grade 3/Grade 9
Grade 4/Grade 10
Grade 5
Grade 6
B. Senior High School
1. Learner–Facility Ratio
School Year
Learner-Facility Ratio
(Specify the ratio in the cells across the specified School Year)
Computer Units Chairs Classroom
Wash Area
(with 10
faucets)
Toilet
Male Female
2019 – 2020
Issues and
Concerns
2. Learner–Textbook Ratio
Grade Level
Learner–Textbook Ratio Subject Area by Grade Level
Please supply the subject title. Indicate one subject title per cell of the cells found below this row.
Add column/s when necessary.
Grade 11
Grade 12
VII. AIP 2019–2020 Implementation
AIP
Component
Objective/s
(Add additional
row/s per AIP
Component when
necessary)
Target
Accom-
plish-
ment
Facilitating
Factor/s
Effect/s to
Performance
Hindering
Factor/s
Effect/s to
Performance
1. Access
a.
b.
c.
2. Quality
a.
b.
c.
3. Governance
a.
b.
c.
VIII. Achievement in Terms of the School Performance Indicators
Other School
Performance
Indicators
Rating
(%)
If the school is improving, identify the
facilitating factors
If the school is NOT improving, identify the
hindering factors
Promotion Rate
Graduation Rate
Dropout Rate
Failure Rate
Completion Rate
Nutritional
Status
N
W
SW
IX. Teachers Performance in Managing Teaching-Learning Process
KRA (Based on
ICRF of Teachers)
Number of Teachers/Performance Indicator (Based on IPCRF)
Outstanding (5) Very Satisfactory (4) Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory (3) Poor (1)
Content Knowledge
& Pedagogy
Learning
Environment and
Diversity of Learners
Curriculum Planning
Assessment and
Reporting
What technical assistance (TA) should be provided to the teachers (if needed) based on their performance: __________________________