enebc-portrait final

1
Pa#erning defects in Dh mice Dh arose as a spontaneous muta,on in mice (Carter, 1954). Dh animals exhibit reduced numbers of lumbar vertebrae, asymmetric preaxial hindlimb defects such as distal shortening or absence of the ,bia, and polydactyly, oligodactyly, and triphalangism of digit 1 (Searle, 1964; Green, 1967; Rooze, 1977). Asymmetry of hindlimb skeletal defects is oJen observed; the leJ side is more frequently affected than the right (Owen, 2006). These posterior skeletal defects and soJ ,ssue defects (including asplenia) suggest a primary defect in A-P and L-R paUerning. The role of Dominant hemimelia in morphogenesis of the gut and the midgut to hindgut transi6on Pei-Chen Emily Hsieh and Mary H. Owen, Ph.D. Department of Biology, Simmons College, Boston, MA During gastrula,on, the primi,ve streak defines the major body axes of the mammalian embryo and cells acquire different iden,,es, depending on their posi,on in the embryo. These axes determine correct placement, orienta,on and forma,on of organs; devia,ons in the normal paUern may result in defects in organs such as heart and skeleton with clinical implica,ons. Muta,ons in genes that affect paUerning in mice may provide important insights to human disorders. Dominant hemimelia (Dh), a spontaneous muta,on in mice, provides such a model. Dh animals exhibit reduced numbers of lumbar vertebrae, asymmetric preaxial hindlimb defects and asplenia, sugges,ng a primary defect in anterior-posterior and leJ-right paUerning of the mesoderm. Prior reports also suggest that the posterior midgut and its transi,on to hindgut may be affected in Dh animals. This study was undertaken to describe the range of defects in the adult midgut and midgut to hindgut transi,on, the associa,on with skeletal defects, and the developmental expression of key paUerning genes (Hoxd 10 and 11) in the gut of Dh embryos and their wild-type liUermates. Hox genes are known to specify splanchnic mesoderm, which then signals the underlying endoderm further refining regional boundaries. Gastro-intes,nal (GI) tracts were removed from adult animals and the dimensions of the GI regions recorded. Skeletons of these animals were stained using Alizarin Red - Alcian Blue (McLeod, 1980). Dh/+ C3HB6 mice were mated with +/+ AKR/J mice and the affected F 1 females backcrossed to +/+ AKR/J males. F 2 embryos were harvested at 10 to 12 days in gesta,on (plug date=0), head ,ssues removed for genotyping, and carcasses prepared for in situ analysis of Hoxd10 and 11 expression domains. Preliminary analyses reveal a shortening of the gut of Dh animals as compared to wild-type liUermates, with smaller or absent caeca in the more severely affected Dh animals. Skeletal analyses and in situ hybridiza,on studies are in progress. Results Methods C3HB6 Animals Adult Dh/+ and +/+ animals Remove Dh/+ and +/+ gut Measure length of small intes,ne and dimensions of caecum Stain skeleton Analyze skeleton (i.e., ,bial length) Breed for F 1 offspring then F 2 embryos Harvest embryos Obtain ,ssue for genotype Conduct in situ hybridiza,on Obtain ,ssue for genotyping Document gut lengths Stain skeleton Euthanize pregnant (F 1 ) dam § To determine whether there is shortening of the small intes,ne in adult animals heterozygous for the Dh allele § To explore the rela,onship between severity of gut defects and skeletal defects. § To study expression of relevant 5’ Hox genes (Hoxd10 and Hoxd11) in developing guts of Dh and wild-type liUermates, as differences in Hox expression that may lead to the observed paUerning defects in adults Role of Hox genes in embryonic pa#erning (A-P) and pa#erning of gut § Hox genes are highly conserved genes, ancestrally related to homeo,c selector genes (Hom-C genes) of Drosophila § In mammals, there are four copies of the Hox complex per haploid complement § Hox genes encode transcrip,on factors, important to paUerning of neural tube, neural crest cells, paraxial and splanchnic mesoderm and other ,ssues. § Hox genes arranged in order on chromosome of their spa,al expression, with 3’ Hox genes expressed more anteriorly and 5’ Hox gene more posteriorly. § These genes are known to play a role in paUerning of posterior, splanchnic mesoderm which informs the development of func,onal regions of endoderm (posterior midgut through hindgut) P 1 : a’Dh/a’+ x a+/a+ F 1 : a’Dh/a+ or a’+/a+ P 2 : a’Dh/a+ x a+/a+ F 2 : a’Dh/a+ or a+/a+ Genotyping Figure 3. These crosses create embryos with polymorphisms at specific DNA markers sites linked to gene of interest (Dh gene). Original stock Dh/+ C3HB6 female mice were crossed with +/+ AKR/J males (P 1 ). F 1 Dh females were backcrossed to +/+ AKR/J males to generate F 2 offspring with polymorphisms in D1Mit10, 265 and 309 microsatellite markers that can be used in genotyping. D1Mit10 D1Mit265 D1Mit309 C3HB6 139bp 106bp 127bp AKR/J 133bp 126bp 162bp In Situ Hybridiza6on Figure 4. The procedure of in situ hybridiza,on. (Gilbert, 2006) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 10 11 12 13 14 15 9 Introduc6on Abstract Aims Figure 2. (A) Hox genes are highly conserved genes encoding transcrip,on factors that “specify A-P polarity (Gilbert, 2010)“ in vertebrates (hUp://cnx.org/contents/0Jy9PqKT@8/Features-of-the- Animal-Kingdom#fig-ch27_01_04). (B) Areas of the endoderm whose regional iden,ty is refined by interac,ons with surrounding Hox-gene specified splanchnic mesoderm. (Gilbert, 2004) Dh/+ animals were found to have a range of small intes,ne lengths. Such a range in effects was previously observed in ,bial length (Morin et al. , 1999). Lengths of the small intes,nes of Dh/+ animals were shorter than those of +/+ animals: Comparison of small intes,ne length (p=0.0351); Comparison of small intes,ne length: body length (p<0.0001). Some Dh/+ animals had reduced or absent caeca. Analysis is ongoing. Discussion Thank you to Dr. Owen for suppor,ng, direc,ng, troubleshoo,ng, and edi,ng this work. Kelsey Hern, without whose support and help I would not have been able to complete this work. Acknowledgements These studies were conducted with the approval of the Simmons College Ins,tu,onal Animal Care and Use CommiUee. IUCAC Approval Gilbert, S. F. (2006). Developmental Biology. Sunderland, MassachuseUs: Sinauer Associates, Inc,. 358-497. Green, M. C. (1967). A defect of the mesoderm caused by the mutant gene Dominant hemimelia. Developmental Biology, 15, 62-89. Owen, M. H., Coull, B. A., & Holmes, L. B. (2006). Asymmetry of skeletal effects of Dominant hemimelia. Birth Defects Research. (Part A). Clinical and Molecular Teratology, 76(6), 474-482. Rooze, M. A. (1977) . The effects of the Dh gene on limb morphogenesis in the mouse. Birth defects: Original Ar,cle Series, 13(1), 69-95. References Figure 6. (A) Hindlimb of Dh/+ animal and (C) its gut (stomach to caecum). (B) Hindlimb of wild-type animal and (D) its gut (stomach to caecum), 1= stomach and 2- caecum. Tissues were fixed prior to photographing. B D C A A B Figure 1. (A) Dh/+ adult. This image was contributed for Mouse Genome Database use. Note: Dh/Dh animals die aJer birth. (hUp://www.informa,cs.jax.org/image/phenoSummary/marker/MGI:94889 ). (B) Hindlimb skeletal elements (Alizarin red/Alcian blue stain) of 18 day Dh/+ embryo. Absence of ,bia and oligodactyly of digit one is found on the leJ; ,bial shortening and syndactyly of digits 1 and 2 on the right (Owen et al., 2006). A. Figure 5. Ra,os of small intes,ne length to body length for Dh/+ and +/+ animals (p<0.0001). Length of small intes,ne was determined prior to fixa,on. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 10 11 12 13 14 15 9 Figure 7. Genotyping results. Amplified D1Mit10 from DNA purified from head ,ssue of F 2 embryos (1:20 dilu,on of DNA). Dh/+ animals two bands; +/+ single band. 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Small intes6ne/body length (cm) Animal number Wild-type Dh/+ B.

Upload: emily-pei-chen-hsieh

Post on 12-Apr-2017

8 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: ENEBC-PORTRAIT final

Pa#erningdefectsinDhmiceDh arose as a spontaneousmuta,on inmice (Carter, 1954).Dhanimals exhibit reduced numbers of lumbar vertebrae,asymmetricpreaxialhindlimbdefectssuchasdistalshorteningorabsence of the ,bia, and polydactyly, oligodactyly, andtriphalangismofdigit1(Searle,1964;Green,1967;Rooze,1977).AsymmetryofhindlimbskeletaldefectsisoJenobserved;theleJside is more frequently affected than the right (Owen, 2006).TheseposteriorskeletaldefectsandsoJ,ssuedefects (includingasplenia)suggestaprimarydefectinA-PandL-RpaUerning.

TheroleofDominanthemimeliainmorphogenesisofthegutandthemidguttohindguttransi6on

Pei-ChenEmilyHsiehandMaryH.Owen,Ph.D.DepartmentofBiology,SimmonsCollege,Boston,MA

During gastrula,on, the primi,ve streak defines themajor bodyaxes of the mammalian embryo and cells acquire differentiden,,es,dependingontheirposi,onintheembryo.Theseaxesdetermine correct placement, orienta,on and forma,on oforgans;devia,ons in thenormalpaUernmay result indefects inorgans such as heart and skeleton with clinical implica,ons.Muta,ons in genes that affect paUerning in mice may provideimportantinsightstohumandisorders.Dominanthemimelia(Dh),a spontaneous muta,on in mice, provides such a model. Dhanimals exhibit reduced numbers of lumbar vertebrae,asymmetric preaxial hindlimb defects and asplenia, sugges,ng aprimary defect in anterior-posterior and leJ-right paUerning ofthe mesoderm. Prior reports also suggest that the posteriormidgutanditstransi,ontohindgutmaybeaffectedinDhanimals.Thisstudywasundertakentodescribetherangeofdefectsintheadult midgut and midgut to hindgut transi,on, the associa,onwith skeletal defects, and the developmental expression of keypaUerninggenes(Hoxd10and11) inthegutofDhembryosandtheir wild-type liUermates. Hox genes are known to specifysplanchnic mesoderm, which then signals the underlyingendoderm further refining regional boundaries. Gastro-intes,nal(GI) tractswereremovedfromadultanimalsandthedimensionsof the GI regions recorded. Skeletons of these animals werestained using Alizarin Red - Alcian Blue (McLeod, 1980). Dh/+C3HB6micewerematedwith+/+AKR/JmiceandtheaffectedF1females backcrossed to +/+ AKR/J males. F2 embryos wereharvestedat10to12daysingesta,on(plugdate=0),head,ssuesremoved for genotyping, and carcasses prepared for in situanalysis of Hoxd10 and 11 expression domains. PreliminaryanalysesrevealashorteningofthegutofDhanimalsascomparedtowild-typeliUermates,withsmallerorabsentcaecainthemoreseverely affected Dh animals. Skeletal analyses and in situhybridiza,onstudiesareinprogress.

Results

Methods

C3HB6Animals

AdultDh/+and+/+animals

RemoveDh/+and+/+gut

Measurelengthofsmallintes,neand

dimensionsofcaecum

Stainskeleton

Analyzeskeleton(i.e.,,biallength)

BreedforF1offspringthenF2embryos

Harvestembryos

Obtain,ssueforgenotype

Conductinsituhybridiza,on

Obtain,ssueforgenotyping

Documentgutlengths

Stainskeleton

Euthanizepregnant(F1)

dam

§  Todeterminewhetherthereisshorteningofthesmallintes,neinadultanimalsheterozygousfortheDhallele

§  Toexploretherela,onshipbetweenseverityofgutdefectsandskeletaldefects.

§  Tostudyexpressionofrelevant5’Hoxgenes(Hoxd10andHoxd11)indevelopinggutsofDhandwild-typeliUermates,asdifferencesinHoxexpressionthatmayleadtotheobservedpaUerningdefectsinadults

RoleofHoxgenesinembryonicpa#erning(A-P)andpa#erningofgut§  Hoxgenesarehighlyconservedgenes,ancestrallyrelatedto

homeo,cselectorgenes(Hom-Cgenes)ofDrosophila§  Inmammals,therearefourcopiesoftheHoxcomplexper

haploidcomplement§  Hoxgenesencodetranscrip,onfactors,importanttopaUerning

ofneuraltube,neuralcrestcells,paraxialandsplanchnicmesodermandother,ssues.

§  Hoxgenesarrangedinorderonchromosomeoftheirspa,alexpression,with3’Hoxgenesexpressedmoreanteriorlyand5’Hoxgenemoreposteriorly.

§  ThesegenesareknowntoplayaroleinpaUerningofposterior,splanchnicmesodermwhichinformsthedevelopmentoffunc,onalregionsofendoderm(posteriormidgutthroughhindgut)

P1:a’Dh/a’+xa+/a+

F1:a’Dh/a+ora’+/a+

P2:a’Dh/a+xa+/a+

F2:a’Dh/a+ora+/a+

Genotyping

Figure3.ThesecrossescreateembryoswithpolymorphismsatspecificDNAmarkerssiteslinkedtogeneofinterest(Dhgene).OriginalstockDh/+C3HB6femalemicewerecrossedwith+/+AKR/Jmales(P1).F1Dhfemaleswerebackcrossedto+/+AKR/JmalestogenerateF2offspringwithpolymorphismsinD1Mit10,265and309microsatellitemarkersthatcanbeusedingenotyping.

D1Mit10 D1Mit265 D1Mit309

C3HB6 139bp 106bp 127bp

AKR/J 133bp 126bp 162bp

InSituHybridiza6on

Figure4.Theprocedureofinsituhybridiza,on.(Gilbert,2006)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 10 11 12 13 14 159

Introduc6on

Abstract

Aims

Figure2.(A)Hoxgenesarehighlyconservedgenesencodingtranscrip,onfactorsthat“specifyA-Ppolarity(Gilbert,2010)“invertebrates(hUp://cnx.org/contents/0Jy9PqKT@8/Features-of-the-Animal-Kingdom#fig-ch27_01_04).(B)Areasoftheendodermwhoseregionaliden,tyisrefinedbyinterac,onswithsurroundingHox-genespecifiedsplanchnicmesoderm.(Gilbert,2004)

•  Dh/+ animals were found to have a range of smallintes,ne lengths. Such a range in effectswaspreviouslyobservedin,biallength(Morinetal.,1999).

•  Lengths of the small intes,nes of Dh/+ animals wereshorterthanthoseof+/+animals: Comparisonofsmallintes,ne length (p=0.0351); Comparison of smallintes,nelength:bodylength(p<0.0001).

•  SomeDh/+animalshadreducedorabsentcaeca.Analysisisongoing.

Discussion

Thank you to Dr. Owen for suppor,ng, direc,ng,troubleshoo,ng, and edi,ng this work. Kelsey Hern,without whose support and help I would not have beenabletocompletethiswork.

Acknowledgements

ThesestudieswereconductedwiththeapprovaloftheSimmonsCollegeIns,tu,onalAnimalCareandUseCommiUee.

IUCACApproval

•  Gilbert,S.F.(2006).DevelopmentalBiology.Sunderland,MassachuseUs:SinauerAssociates,Inc,.358-497.

•  Green,M.C.(1967).AdefectofthemesodermcausedbythemutantgeneDominanthemimelia.DevelopmentalBiology,15,62-89.

•  Owen,M.H.,Coull,B.A.,&Holmes,L.B.(2006).Asymmetryofskeletal effects of Dominant hemimelia. Birth DefectsResearch. (Part A). Clinical and Molecular Teratology, 76(6),474-482.

•  Rooze, M. A. (1977) . The effects of the Dh gene on limbmorphogenesis in the mouse. Birth defects: Original Ar,cleSeries,13(1),69-95.

References

Figure6.(A)HindlimbofDh/+animaland(C)itsgut(stomachtocaecum).(B)Hindlimbofwild-typeanimaland(D)itsgut(stomachtocaecum),1=stomachand2-caecum.Tissueswerefixedpriortophotographing.

B D

C

A

A B

Figure1.(A)Dh/+adult.ThisimagewascontributedforMouseGenomeDatabaseuse.Note:Dh/DhanimalsdieaJerbirth.(hUp://www.informa,cs.jax.org/image/phenoSummary/marker/MGI:94889).(B)Hindlimbskeletalelements(Alizarinred/Alcianbluestain)of18dayDh/+embryo.Absenceof,biaandoligodactylyofdigitoneisfoundontheleJ;,bialshorteningandsyndactylyofdigits1and2ontheright(Owenetal.,2006).

A.

Figure 5. Ra,os of small intes,ne length to body length forDh/+ and +/+animals (p<0.0001). Length of small intes,ne was determined prior tofixa,on.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 10 11 12 13 14 159

Figure7.Genotypingresults.AmplifiedD1Mit10fromDNApurifiedfromhead,ssueofF2embryos(1:20dilu,onofDNA).Dh/+animalstwobands;+/+singleband.

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

0 2 4 6 8 10 12

Smallintes6n

e/bo

dylength(cm)

Animalnumber

Wild-type

Dh/+

B.