engine emissions stack testing

Upload: katamganeshbab329

Post on 18-Oct-2015

65 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

engine emissions

TRANSCRIPT

  • Engine Emissions Stack Testing and Analyzer Workshop

    New Air Regulations, Test Requirements and Test Strategies

  • Jeff Thomason, QSTI

    P j t Di tProject DirectorTRC

    9225 U.S. Highway 183 SouthAustin, Texas512/243-0202

  • Topics of Conversation

    Federal Regulations Subpart JJJJ Subpart ZZZZ Greenhouse Gases Measuring Hydrocarbons EPA Methods 1 and 1A VOCs, HAPs, & Hard Stuff

  • EPA National Stack Testing Guidelines

    Goals Improve uniformity on how tests are

    conducted Improve coordination between EPA and Improve coordination between EPA and

    state/local agencies Enhance EPA oversight of state/local

    programs http://www.epa.gov/ttn/emc/guidlnd/g

    d-050.pdf

  • EPA National Stack Testing Guidelines

    Regulated units include Reciprocating Internal Combustion

    Engines NSPS Turbines NSPS Turbines Title V and PSD Permitted Sources

    Title V: 10 tons / 25 tons qualifiers

    Adopted by State Agencies for Construction &

    Operating Permits

  • EPA National Stack Testing Guidelines

    Section VI-Conduct of Stack Tests1. Time Frame

    a facility that has not completed a stack test within the requisite time frame would be in violation of the requirement to stack test

  • EPA National Stack Testing Guidelines

    Section VI-Conduct of Stack Tests2. Test Waivers-NO WAIVERS even on identical NO WAIVERSeven on identical units unless:

    in service at the same facilityoperated/maintained the same wayemissions applicable standard

  • EPA National Stack Testing Guidelines

    Section VI-Conduct of Stack Tests3. Notification of Stack Tests

    Timing and content of notification Must provide notification of delays

    as soon as possibleNotification is not necessary if the test

    is for the facilitys own benefitHOWEVER

  • EPA National Stack Testing Guidelines

    IF YOU FAIL (and are a Title V source)

    YOU MUST REPORT THE FAILURE AND SUBMIT THE DATA TO THE PROPER AGENCY

  • EPA National Stack Testing Guidelines

    Section VI-Conduct of Stack Tests Test Protocol should be submitted

    www.epa.gov/compliance/assistance/air/index.htmlhtml

    Tell the agency which unit, where, why, when, and who

    Explain the test matrix Describe process data and load determination Identify the test methods, and explain any request

    for deviations

  • EPA National Stack Testing Guidelines

    Section VI-Conduct of Stack Tests Observation of Stack Tests

    Will they come? Why should it matter? If notification wasnt timely then the

    resulting test data may be rejected and a new stack test required.

  • EPA National Stack Testing Guidelines

    Section VI-Conduct of Stack Tests Representative Testing Conditions Generally, test at the maximum load condition y,

    the source is designed for If you do not operate at that level, test at

    where you do operate but you must DOCUMENT historical trends

    Different state/local agencies have their own criteria

  • EPA National Stack Testing Guidelines

    Section VI-Conduct of Stack Tests Stoppages

    If you stop because you might fail, you y p y g , ywould be considered in violation of both the requirement to test and the permit condition

    If you have to stop because of equipment failure, severe weather and/or safety, complete the run thats in progress if possible and fully document the reasons for stoppage

  • EPA National Stack Testing Guidelines

    Section VI-Conduct of Stack Tests Postponements

    Considered in same way as stoppagesy pp g the delegated agency should carefully

    scrutinize the circumstances surrounding the postponement to determine whether the facility was in violation of the underlying emission limitationsand postponed to avoid a documented violation.

  • EPA National Stack Testing Guidelines

    Section VI-Conduct of Stack Tests Reports

    Should be detailed enough to assess Should be detailed enough to assess compliance with the regulatory requirements

    www.epa.gov/ttnemc01/guidlnd/gd-043.wpd

    Submit as soon as possible-most states have specific timelines-Typically 30, 45, or 60 days. EPA reports have 60 days

  • EPA National Stack Testing Guidelines

    Section VI-Conduct of Stack Tests Rounding of Significant Figures

    Report the same number of figures that Report the same number of figures that are in your permit

    If its less than 5, round down. If its more than 5, round up

    If its exactly 5 followed by zeros, round up if the number is odd. Leave it if the number is even

  • Subpart JJJJ

    QUAD JQUAD J

  • Subpart JJJJ

    New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) 40 CFR 60, Subpart JJJJ

    National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) 40 CFR 63, Subpart ZZZZ (RICE MACT)

    Published January 18, 2008 Affects ALL new, reconstructed or modified

    IC engines Standards get more stringent in 2010/2011

    depending on engine type/size

  • Subpart JJJJ

    Technology Basis Rich Burn: NSCR Lean Burn: combustion based controls

    (Low Emission Combustion)

    Pollutants and Emission Limits

    (Low Emission Combustion) Emission Limits for NOx, CO, VOC

    VOC as defined includes HCHO, but notincluded for this subpart

    NOx + HC included for some smaller engines

  • Subpart JJJJ

    Non-Emergency Engines 100hp

  • Subpart JJJJ

    Non-Emergency Engines 100hp

  • Subpart JJJJ

    Non-Emergency Lean Burn Engines 500hp

  • Subpart JJJJ

    Non-Emergency Engines (except LB) 500 hp

    Pollutants and Emission Limits

    MFGDATE NOx CO VOC NOx CO VOC

    7/1/2007 2.0 4.0 1.0 160 540 867/1/2010 1.0 2.0 0.7 82 270 60

    g/bhp-hr ppmv @ 15% O2

  • Subpart JJJJ

    Natural Gas Fired Lawn Mower Engines 25hp100

    Pollutants and Emission Limits

    MFGDATE CO

    7/1/2008 6.53.8HC + NOx

    g/bhp-hr

  • Subpart JJJJ

    Reconstructed or modified engines Applies to EXISTING UNITS (6/12/06)

    Pollutants and Emission Limits

    R/M ppmv @ 15% O2g/bhp-hr

    25 hp must meet new engine standard New engines subject to JJJJ that are R/M

    must meet JJJJ standards

    R/MDATE NOx CO VOC NOx CO VOC

    6/12/2006 3.0 4.0 1.0 250 540 86(non emgy,

  • Subpart JJJJ

    What is new? Date the engine was ordered is the day

    construction starts

    If ordered on or before 6/12/06, engine is EXISTING and Quad J engine is EXISTING and Quad J doesnt apply

    If ordered after 6/12/06 but MANUFACTURED before, Quad J doesnt apply

    If ordered after and manufactured after 6/12/06, Quad J DOES apply

  • Subpart JJJJ

    What is Modified? Physical or operational change to an

    existing facility that results in an increase in the emission rate

    An existing facility is affected for each pollutant with a standard and an emission rate increase

    Exemptions include installation of pollutant control devices

    Compliance required within 180 days of the change

  • Subpart JJJJ

    EPA Revisions proposed 6/8/10

    Proposed rule includes new definition for reconstruction The fixed capital cost of new components

    exceeds 50% of the cost of an entirely new facility in todays $$$

    Engineering, transportation, installation, start-up, etc. costs must be INCLUDED

    Must be feasible

  • Subpart JJJJ

    EPA Revisions proposed 6/8/10 New definition: For purposes of

    reconstruction, an existing t ti i i d fi d stationary engine is defined as

    including those components mounted to or within the cylinder block, the engine housings, and engine mounted components, but excluding ancillary components such as external cooling for fuel supply.

  • Subpart JJJJ

    EPA Revisions proposed 6/8/10 Draws narrower box around the equipment

    considered in cost calculations than historical NSPS determinations and historical NSPS determinations and excludes necessary engine components

    Mobile source paradigm (mounted on engine) does not properly consider stationary source scenario Comments stressed that components

    inherent to engine operation (e.g., cooling) should be included in the costs

  • Subpart JJJJ

    EPA Revisions proposed 6/8/10

    Date of manufacture definition includes:Reconstructed engines are assigned a new date of manufacture if the crankshaft is removed as part of the reconstruction or if the the crankshaft is removed as part of the reconstruction or if the fixed capital cost of the new and refurbished components exceeds 75 percent of the fixed capital cost of a comparable new engine (see the definition of "reconstruct"). An engine that is produced from a previously used engine block does not retain the date of manufacture of the engine in which the engine block was previously used if the engine serial number was removed (or the engine otherwise loses its identity), or the engine is produced using all new components except for the engine block. In all these cases, the date of manufacture is the date of reconstruction or the date the new engine is produced.

  • Subpart JJJJ

    What about Relocation? In and of itself, relocation does NOT

    trigger modification or reconstruction and are not subject t NSPS to NSPS (unless manufactured after the earlier dates)

    Evaluate whether reconstruction or modification occurs

    EPA says changes in control equipment or method of operation can trigger applicability

  • Subpart JJJJAdditional stuff for relocated

    engines Operators must understand changes,

    if any, to relocated engines Has engine been modified i e rich to Has engine been modified, i.e. rich to

    lean? Was engine rebuilt or was major

    maintenance or repair completed?

    Ownership changes does not make an engine new

    Operators ARE responsible for ensuring compliance of relocated engines

  • Subpart JJJJ

    Engine Rating (40CFR1039.140)An engine configurations maximum

    engine power is the maximum brake power point on the nominal power curve power point on the nominal power curve for engine configuration

    o Its manufacturer nameplate rating without consideration of elevation, etc.

    o RICE MACT is site rated.

  • Subpart JJJJ

    THREE ENGINE TYPES1. Certified Engines

    2. Non-Certified Engines2. Non Certified Engines

    3. Certified engines operating as non-certified engines

  • Subpart JJJJ

    CERTIFIEDo manufacturers test the engine

    according to a defined operating cycle to validate compliance

    o Full Load tests requiredo High Load engines- 100% & 75%o ISO 8178, D-1 Cycle-100/100% plus

    30%/100%; 50%/75%; 20%/50%o DO NOT require compliance tests

    under JJJJ, but many states require it

  • Subpart JJJJ

    CERTIFIEDo MFG insures compliance for certified

    emissions life-5000 operating hours or lessMFG O&M MUST be followed by o MFG O&M MUST be followed by operator

    o Operators must comply with the emission standards for the life of the engine

  • Subpart JJJJ

    NON-CERTIFIEDo Requires an initial performance testo Maintenance plan & recordso Periodic tests for engines >500 Hpg p

    o Every 8760 hours or once per 3 years

    o No further tests for engines< 500 HPo Unless major repair or rebuild

    (40CFR60.4243(f))o Major repair or rebuild is not defined

  • Subpart JJJJ

    CERTIFIED OPERATING AS NON-CERTIFIED

    o Operators can opt not to follow MFG O&M or may be precluded y p(fuel quality)

    o Same requirements as non-certified

    o Engines

  • Subpart JJJJ

    PERFORMANCE TESTSo Subpart REQUIRES compliance

    demonstration for NOx, CO, VOCo Applies to modified/reconstructedo Applies to modified/reconstructedo Applies to Non-Certified Engineso Applies to Certified operating as

    Non-Certified 100 Hp

  • Subpart JJJJ

    PERFORMANCE TESTSTest Timeline

    o Non-certified > 25 Hp: within 60 days of max production but no later than 180 days of startuplater than 180 days of startup

    o CONC 100 Hp: within 1 year of start up

    o Subsequent tests for both >500 Hp every 8760 hrs/3 years

    o After rebuild or major repair for engines >500 Hp

  • Subpart JJJJ

    PERFORMANCE TESTSTest trigger for rebuild/major

    repair not currently well definedo Operators burden to determine if

    requiredo DOCUMENT THE DECISION

  • Subpart JJJJ

    PERFORMANCE TESTSo Three test runs of at least one

    houro Operate at 100 10%o Operate at 100 10%o Measure/collect at outlet of

    any control deviceso Dont test during start up,

    shut down or malfunction

  • Subpart JJJJ

    PERFORMANCE TESTSo Measure NOx, CO, VOC, O2

    and moistureo If complying with g/Hp-hr

    o Exhaust gas flow rateo Hp

  • Subpart JJJJ

    PERFORMANCE TESTSo EPA Reference Methods

    o NOx-7Eo CO-10o O2-3Ao VOC methods to come

  • Subpart JJJJ

    PERFORMANCE TESTSo Portable Analyzer Methods

    o ASTM D6522o Administrator approved alternative portable analyzer method

    o ASTM D6420-99 (GC/MS)

  • Subpart JJJJ

    PERFORMANCE TESTSo Fourier Transform Infrared

    Spectroscopy (FTIR)o EPA RM 320o ASTM D6348-03

    o Wet or Dry Basis?o So?

  • Subpart JJJJ

    PERFORMANCE TESTSo VOC Test Issues

    o Does not include methane (CH ) th (C H )(CH4) or ethane (C2H6)

    o Does not include HCHOo Reported as ppmv Propaneo Two approaches- additive or subtractive

  • Subpart JJJJ

    PERFORMANCE TESTSo Additive Methods

    o Quantify and sum applicable i di id l HC iindividual HC species

    o Can be beneficial for NG fired sources due to high CH4/C2H6composition

  • Subpart JJJJ

    PERFORMANCE TESTSo Subtractive Methods

    o Difference between THC and CH + C HCH4 + C2H6

    o Subtracting two very similar numbers can cause error

    o Shouldnt be a problem if C2H6is

  • Subpart JJJJ

    PERFORMANCE TESTSo Additive Methods

    o Gas Chromatographyo FTIR

    Presurvey requiredo Presurvey requiredo INGAA and EPA discussion of one-time

    presurvey to define VOC species for NG-fired ICEs

    o Option to adjust aldehydes and other oxygenated HC for 25A response factors

  • Subpart JJJJ

    PERFORMANCE TESTSo Subtractive Methods

    o EPA 25A +Gas Chromatographyo VOC = THC (CH + C H )o VOC = THC (CH4 + C2H6)o Poor response to HCHO but not a VOCo Must be performed very well

    o EPA 25A with a methane cuttero Dual channel FIDo Possible high bias if high C2H6

  • Subpart JJJJ

    PERFORMANCE TESTSo Exhaust Moisture

    o VOC measured hot & weto Mass emissions are dryo Everything must be on same basis

  • Subpart JJJJ

    PERFORMANCE TESTSo Exhaust Flow

    o EPA Method 2 Pitot Tubeo EPA Method 19 o EPA Method 19

    o Preferred due to pulsating flowo Must have

    o Fuel Flow rate (orifice cal!)o Fuel Composition (not last

    years)

  • Subpart ZZZZ

    Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines (RICE), Maximum Available Control Technology (MACT)

    Subpart ZZZZ (RICE MACT) is designed to regulate hazardous air pollutants (HAPS). In the case of reciprocating engines, the surrogates are Carbon Monoxide (CO) and Formaldehyde (HCHO).

  • Subpart ZZZZ

    RICE MACT REVISITEDo Final Rule amended 8/20/10o EFFECTIVE DATE IS 10/19/10o Three years (10/19/13) for newly o Three years (10/19/13) for newly

    affected engines to complyo Now includes all engines except

    existing major source lean burns >500 Hp

    o These will be addressed in 2012

  • Subpart ZZZZ

    RICE MACT REVISITEDo With proposed amendments,

    ALL new and reconstructed units are affected regardless units are affected regardless of size

    o Most units comply based on NSPS

    o Original RICE MACT rule applies as appropriate

  • Subpart ZZZZ

    RICE MACT REVISITEDo Major HAP source emits

    o 10 tons/year of a single HAPo 25 tons/year of cumulative HAPSo 25 tons/year of cumulative HAPSo HCHO typically drives major source

    status for sites with multiple RICEo If emissions reduced below the

    threshold prior to the regulatory date, facility is an area source.

  • Subpart ZZZZ

    Emission Limits:Major Sources

    o SI RICE < 100 Hpo No numerical emission standards

    o 2 Stroke Lean Burn (2SLB) 100 HP 500o CO concentration 225 ppmvd @ 15% O2

    o 2 Stroke Lean Burn (2SLB) 500 Hpo Reduction of CO across an oxidation catalyst

    58 %o CO concentration 225 ppmvd @ 15% O2

  • Subpart ZZZZ

    Emission Limits:Major Sources

    o 4 Stroke Lean Burn (4SLB) 100 HP 500CO t ti 47 d @ 15% Oo CO concentration 47 ppmvd @ 15% O2

    o 4 Stroke Lean Burn (4SLB) 500 Hpo Reduction of CO across a catalyst 93%o HCHO concentration 14 ppmvd @ 15% O2

  • Subpart ZZZZ

    Emission Limits:Major Sources

    o 4 Stroke Rich Burn (4SRB) 100 HP 500HCHO t ti 10 3 d @ 15% Oo HCHO concentration 10.3 ppmvd @ 15% O2

    o 4 Stroke Rich Burn (4SRB) 500 Hpo Reduction of HCHO across a catalyst 76%o HCHO concentration 350 ppbvd @ 15% O2

  • Subpart ZZZZ

    Emission Limits:Area Sources

    o 4 Stroke Lean Burn (4SLB) 500 HpR d ti f CO t l t 93%o Reduction of CO across a catalyst 93%

    o CO concentration 47 ppmvd @ 15% O2

    o 4 Stroke Rich Burn (4SRB) 500 Hpo Reduction of HCHO across a catalyst 76%o HCHO concentration 2.7 ppmvd @ 15% O2

  • Subpart ZZZZ

    Test Frequency :Major Sources

    o SI RICE < 100 Hpo Do not have to conduct any performance test.o Must develop a maintenance plan that specifies how the

    management practice will be met and provides to the extent practicable for the maintenance and operation of the engine in a manner consistent with minimizing emissions.

    o 2 Stroke Lean Burn (2SLB) 100 HP 500o Must conduct an initial performance test to demonstrate

    that they are achieving the required emission standards.o If oxidation catalyst is changed, conduct new emission test.

  • Subpart ZZZZ

    Test Frequency:Major Source

    o 2 Stroke Lean Burn (2SLB) 500 Hpo Must conduct an initial performance test to demonstrate

    that they are achieving the required emission standards.o Semi-annual testing until demonstrating compliance for

    two consecutive tests, then annual testing.o If the results of any subsequent annual performance test

    indicate the engine is not in compliance or you deviate from any of your operating limitations, you must resume semiannual performance testing.

    o If oxidation catalyst is changed, conduct new emission test.

  • Subpart ZZZZ

    RICE MACT REVISITEDo Oxidation catalyst temperature

    monitored continuouslyo Catalyst inlet temperature

    450F d 1350Fo 450F and 1350F

    o Pressure drop across catalyst measured monthly

    o P changes no more than 2 H2O from baseline

  • Subpart ZZZZ

    RICE MACT REVISITEDo Performance tests

    o Initial, within 180 days of compliance date

    o Semiannual, goes to annual after 2 consecutive compliant tests (comes back if you fail a test)

    o Catalyst change performance testo Re-establish P baseline

  • Subpart ZZZZ

    RICE MACT REVISITEDo Performance tests

    o Test at 100% 10%o DOCUMENT THE LOAD- define whato DOCUMENT THE LOAD define what

    load is and how it was measuredo Measure inlet temperatureo Measure catalyst pressure dropo Must use approved methods

  • Subpart ZZZZ

    RICE MACT REVISITEDo One New Source Subcategory

    o N/R 4SLB @ MAJOR HAP SOURCEo 250 hpo 250 hp

    o Requires catalytic controlo Requires catalyst inlet temperatureo Requires P monitoringo Requires Performance Testso Requires all reporting & recordkeeping

  • 2010 NESHAP Revisions

    NESHAPo National Emission Standards

    for Hazardous Air Pollutantso Also known as MACT

    o Maximum Achievable Control Technology

  • 2010 NESHAP Revisions

    Emission Limits:o Proposed limits for existing engines more

    stringent that limits for new major source engines subject to RICE MACT

    o Startup, shutdown and malfunction (SSM) emission limit:

    o Start up must be limited to 30 minuteso EPA states that shutdown emissions should

    be the same as normal operation (including catalytic control)

    o Limits apply under all conditions and for all fuel types

  • 2010 NESHAP Revisions

    4SLB Emission Limits:o CO: 47 ppmv @ 15% O2 or 93% Reduction

    o Doable for catalyst equipped LB

    o Significant debate ongoing about EPA methodology

  • 2010 NESHAP Revisions

    4SRB Emission Limits:

    o Major Source HCHO: 10.3 ppmv for 100 -500 Hp

    o Area Source HCHO: 2.7 ppmv OR 76% reduction for >500 Hp

    o Significant debate ongoing about EPA methodology

  • 2010 NESHAP Revisions

    2SLB Emission Limits:

    o Major Source CO: 225 ppmv @ 15% O2 for 100 500 Hp

    o MUST be met at ALL LOADSA b i t l t ?o Are we buying catalysts?

    o Area Source: Management Practices for all regardless of Hp

    o Implications unclear for 2012 Review

  • Green House Gas Emissions

    Its here:o NG GHGs: CO2, CH4, N2Oo Engine exhaust CO2 and CH4

    account for about 20% of GHG emissions at compressor stations

    o Vented and fugitive emissions are ~30-70% of gas transmission emissions

    o Mandatory Reporting in Place

  • Volatile Organic Compound Test Methods

    Key difference in sampling is all VOC are sampled hot and wet vs. dry

    Non-Methane, Non-Ethane Non Methane, Non Ethane Hydrocarbons

    THC-Method 25A VOC-Method 18 (GC/FID) FTIR

  • VOC Testing

    EPA Method 25A-Total Hydrocarbons by FID All THC measured-calibration basis

    either methane or propane Mathematical calculation of VOC from

    THC-THC in exhaust is reflection of unburned fuel

    Methane cutter can give VOC contribution

    Insensitive to HCHO

  • VOC TestingEPA Method 18-Gas Chromatographyo Speciation of hydrocarbons by

    GC/FIDo Time intensiveo Time intensiveo QA/QC is vital to regulatory acceptanceo Tedlar bag and off site analyseso On site, direct interface sampling

  • VOC Testing

    EPA Method 320-FTIR Can see most everything at

    once except O2onceexcept O2 Requires long path length analytical cell Real time results Can add significantly to cost of testing Calibration technique

  • Where Does HCHO Come From?

    If theres O2 in the exhaust, there can be HCHO

    Very little formation in Rich Burn E iEngines

    Did we shoot ourselves in the foot with lean charge engines to reduce NOx?

    Have a catalyst? Prepare to test!

  • Formaldehyde (HCHO) Test Methods

    CO IS A TREND INDICATOR FOR FORMALDEHYDE

    FTIR-real time data, a bit pricey EPA Method 320, ASTM D5348,

    Acetylacetone-much less expensive Precision increases with length of test

    run EPA re-promulgatged Method 323 with

    August 2010 revisions

  • Formaldehyde (HCHO) Test Methods

    Best Choice for a reasonable budget:EPA Method 25A with a Methane Cutter-

    VOCEPA Method 323-HCHO

    Near Real time ResultsNear Real time ResultsShow trendsShow trendsDONT SAMPLE HCHO FROM A DROP TUBE!DONT SAMPLE HCHO FROM A DROP TUBE!

  • Other HAPS of Primary Interest

    Acrolein- C3H4OTough to sample for, no published method weve

    tried completely meets the objectives:i i-inexpensive

    -repeatable -straightforward analyses

    Test methodology will involve collection in impingersRatio somewhere around 30:1 HCHO to C3H4O

  • EPA Methods 1 and 1A

    Tell you where to sample for velocityBased on the diameter and the configuration

    of the stackSpecifies the number of traverse points to

    use for velocity measurementsCan specify the measurement location for

    emission concentrationsEPA has exempted stacks

  • EPA Methods 1 and 1A

    AUPSTREAM

    2 preferred

    0 5 minimum

    B

    0.5 minimum

    DOWNSTREAM

    8 preferred

    2 minimum

  • EPA Methods 1 and 1A0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    24 or 25*20

    1612

    8 or 9*

    stack diameter 12-24 in

    stack diameter > 24 in

    Duct diameters upstream from flow disturbance (Distance A)

    M

    i

    n

    i

    m

    u

    m

    N

    u

    m

    b

    e

    r

    o

    f

    T

    r

    a

    v

    e

    r

    s

    e

    P

    o

    i

    n

    t

    s

    *Larger number forrectangular stacks

    P a r t i c u l a t e T raverses

    B

    ADisturbance

    Disturbance

    MeasurementSiteNumber of

    traverse points is based on

    upstream and 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

    0

    Duct diameters downstream from flow disturbance (Distance B)

    M

    0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5

    2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 100

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    1612

    8 or 9*

    stack diameter 12-24 in

    stack diameter > 24 in

    Duct diameters downstream from flow disturbance (Distance B)

    Duct diameters upstream from flow disturbance (Distance A)

    M

    i

    n

    i

    m

    u

    m

    N

    u

    m

    b

    e

    r

    o

    f

    T

    r

    a

    v

    e

    r

    s

    e

    P

    o

    i

    n

    t

    s

    *Larger number forrectangular stacks

    N o n - P a r t i c u l a t e T raverses

    B

    ADisturbance

    Disturbance

    MeasurementSite

    downstream distance (in

    stack diameters)

    from the flow disturbance

  • EPA Methods 1 and 1A

    Number of traverse points

    is based on upstream and

    24 point layout

    downstream distance (in

    stack diameters)

    from the flow disturbance 12 point layout

  • Make it Easy on YOURSELF

    Too much communication is almost enough

    Clearly define your test objectives Involve Gas Control on Day One Prepare a reasonable schedule with time

    for things to not go perfectly

  • TRC TRC Corporate Overview

    Innovate. Solve. Transform.

  • Corporate OverviewCorporate Overview

    Leading Engineering and Environmental Services Company

    Well-established - Founded in 1970; listed on NYSE (symbol TRR)(symbol TRR)

    Over 2,700 Professionals Operating from over 100 offices www.TRCsolutions.com

  • National PresenceNational Presence

    TRC Offices

  • Environmental

    Infrastructure

    Core ServicesCore Services

    Energy

    Real Estate

    Environmental

  • Market Segments & Practice Market Segments & Practice GroupsGroups

    Environmental

    Natural ResourcesCultural ResourcesCultural ResourcesRemediation

    Air MeasurementsBuilding Sciences

  • Market Segments & Practice Market Segments & Practice GroupsGroups

    Energy & Industrial

    PowerPipelinePipelineManagement Consulting

    Distributed Generation