enseñanzas sobre el concurso el imperial barrel award...well prognosis potential drilling hazard...

Enseñanzas sobre el concurso El Imperial Barrel Award

TEAM LEADER: Carmen Izquierdo

TEAM ADVISOR: Daniel Peña Sierra

TEAM MEMBERS: Pierre Ancajima, Alvaro Gomez, Pedro Apaza, Jonathan Marquina

¿Qué es el IBA?

Objetivos del IBA

• Completar la evaluación técnica de una cuenca o área conpotencial petrolero.

• Definir plays, sistemas petroleros, prospectos y los riesgos.

• Realizar recomendaciones sobre actividades exploratoriasfuturas basados en la tecnología predominante y condicioneseconómicas.

Países Concursantes

Perú

Venezuela

Brasil

Argentina

Trinidad y Tobago

Colombia

México

Ecuador

Etapas del Concurso

• Primera Etapa: A nivel regional enLatinoamérica, vía web.

• Segunda etapa: Semifinal entre los 4 mejores,exposición presencial.

• Tercera etapa: Final a nivel mundial entre losrepresentantes de cada región.

Nuestra Experiencia

7

CONTENTS

I. Basin Focus Analysis

II. Play Focus Analysis

III. Play and Prospect Focus Analysis

IV. Prospect Focus Analysis

V. Final Comments & Recommendations

I. BASIN FOCUS ANALYSISTectonic Evolution

Late CretaceousTo

Paleocene Intra-Continental

Rifting

Eocene ToEarly OligocenePassive Margin

Oligocene ToRecent Active

Marginal Basin

8

I. BASIN FOCUS ANALYSISTectonostratigraphy

9

SELLO “A”

ROCA RESERVORIO “B”

ROCA RESERVORIO

“C”

SELLO “B”

ROCA MADRE “A”

ROCA RESERVORIO “A”

ROCA MADRE “B”

SELLO “C”

I. BASIN FOCUS ANALYSIS

10

IncreasingThickness

Regional Seismic Correlation

Regional Stratigraphic Correlation

11


Petroleum System

Source Rock


12

Pozo 1 Pozo 6

Pozo 3

Input dataPetroleum System – Source Rock


13

Geochemistry Integration and Basic Characterization of Source Rock

From Pyrolisisdata

From Organicmatter description

KEROGEN TYPETOC MATURITY

Petroleum System – Source Rock

I. BASIN FOCUS ANALYSISPetroleum System – Source Rock

14

FORMACIÓN A (Late Cretaceous - Coastal and Swamp)


B

A

15


Basement

1- Vshale thickness (range 350-700m)

2- Vshale thickness (range 1300-600m)

Rakopi A (Kerogen type II)B (Kerogen type III)

16


FORMACIÓN B (Latest Cretaceous)


B

A

I. BASIN FOCUS ANALYSISPetroleum System – Source Rock 1 Vshale thickness (range 50-70m)

2 Vshale thickness (range 150-400m)

17

Wainui A (type III)FORM B (Type II)

18


Petroleum System

Reservoir Rock

I. BASIN FOCUS ANALYSISPetroleum System – Reservoir Rock

19

InputData

Dat

aset

Co

nte

nts

Workflow Evaluation

20

I. BASIN FOCUS ANALYSISPetroleum System – Reservoir Rock

Pozo-1Workflow Evaluation

21

Petroleum System – Reservoir Rock

I. BASIN FOCUS ANALYSIS Pozo-1Workflow Evaluation

Reservoir

Reservoir

22


I. BASIN FOCUS ANALYSIS Pozo-1Workflow Evaluation

Sw ≤ 50%

23


Thickness MapStructural Map

Pozo-1

Net Res = 71.54 mPhi = 0.07 Pozo-2

Pozo-3

Net Res = 21.00 mPhi = 0.15

Net Res = 51.15 mPhi = 0.08

Shoreline barriers


Paleogeographic map

24


Petroleum System

Seal Rock

I. BASIN FOCUS ANALYSISPetroleum System – Seal Rock

25

Formation A Formation B Formation C

StructuralsMaps

SealThickness

Maps

Range 800 to 1400m* Range 50 to 180m* Range 1500 to 2500m*

Seal rocks are enough to preserve the oil and gas accumulations

*Thickness considered on interest area

26

I. BASIN FOCUS ANALYSISPetroleum System – Seal Rock

Reservorio BSello A

Overpressures in the Basin: Distribution, causes, and implications for exploration from Mark Webster, Stephen O’Connor, Bitrus Pindar, and Richard Swarbrick – AAPG Data page

RESERVOIR ROCK

SEAL ROCK

RESERVOIR ROCKSEAL ROCK

Reservorio A

Sello A

Pozo 1 - Presiones

27


Petroleum System

Traps


28

Structural

Stratigraphic

Stratigraphic

StratigraphicStratigraphic

Structural

Structural

Petroleum System – Trap

Structural

29


Petroleum System

Processes

I. BASIN FOCUS ANALYSISPetroleum System – Processes

Basin Modeling 1D and 2D

30

31

I. BASIN FOCUS ANALYSISPetroleum System – Processes

Input Data

Main Input: PWD, SWT, HF

Main Input Data

Pozo 1

32

I. BASIN FOCUS ANALYSISPetroleum System – Process (Basin Modeling 1D)

T-1 Well - Basin Modeling 1D

Ro & Temperature Calibration Overburden History TR & Generation graphs

%Ro

Transformation Ratio

Temperature

Mid of Formation A

Temperatura, Pozo 1

TR all- Temperatura, Pozo 1 Generacion de Petroleo, Pozo 1

Generacion de Gas, Pozo 1 Reflectancia de Vitrinita, Pozo 1

I. BASIN FOCUS ANALYSISPetroleum System – Process (Basin Modeling)

33

Basin Modeling 2D

At 75 Ma. Began overburdenprocess

At 67 Ma the first sights ofhydrocarbon maturation.

At 57 Ma the following kitchenfound the ideal conditions forhydrocarbon maduration.

Transformation RatioSuri

ProspectSuri

Prospect

Saturation: Petroleum

“Effective generation, migration, entrapment and

preservation of Hydrocarbons”

34

I. BASIN FOCUS ANALYSISPetroleum System – Process (Basin Modeling)

Basin Modeling 2D

Migration of Hc

II. PLAY FOCUS ANALYSIS

2

3

3,1

Regional distribution polygon of Reservoir 1.

4

Oil window polygon at 4000 m.b.s.l.

Sandstones regional distribution

Reservoir 1 possiblePlays

Polygon of regional distribution of Reservoir 2

4,1

4,2



5 Polygon of regional distribution of Reservoir 3 Reservoir

5,1

5,2



6 Regional distribution polygon of Seal 1 to Reservoir 1 and Reservoir 2

7 Regional distribution Polygon of Seal 2 toReservoir 3 .

N

1 Basin boundaries.

1

5,1

2

3

4

56

7

3,1

3,2

4,1

4,2

5,2

Common Risk Segment

40

III. PLAY AND PROSPECT FOCUS ANALYSIS

3,2

North Cape Area ( km²) Tane Area ( km²) Tangaroa Area ( km²)

Play 1 4099.44 Lead 5 1.926.423 Lead 7 139.999

Play 2 3322.96 Lead 6 716.172

Prospect 1 1432.01 Play 7 542.843

Lead 1 1092.73 Lead 3 328.699

Play 3 444.073 Lead 4 1013.88

Lead 3 373.92 Play 6 222.31

Play 4 289.782

Play 5 212.904

PLAYS HIERARCHICAL TABLE

N

PLAYS HIERARCHICAL TABLE

2

3

3,1

Regional distribution polygon of Reservoir 1 Reservoir.

3,2

4

Oil window polygon at 4000 m.b.s.l.



Polygon of regional distribution of Reservoir 2

4,1

4,2



5 Polygon of regional distribution of Reservoir 3 Reservoir

5,1

5,2



6 Regional distributionPolygon of Seal 1 toReservoir 1 and Reservoir2

7 Regional distribution Polygon of Tikorangi Seal to Reservoir 3.

1 Taranaki Basin boundaries.

8 Main Prospect to evaluate

1

5,1

2

3

4

56

7

3,1

3,2

4,1

4,2

5,2

Common Risk Segment

41

III. PLAY AND PROSPECT FOCUS ANALYSIS

Medium Risk Zone:• Presence of reservoir has a

moderated risk• There are some dry drilled

wells

High Risk Zone:• There is less control in this zone• The water depth is very high• Knowledges strictly conceptual.

Low Risk Zone:• High level confidence

of charge, reservoirand seal playelements.

• Big traps• Low water depth• Neighborg oil&gas

condensated fields

Main Prospect EvaluatedIV. PROSPECT FOCUS ANALYSIS

Suri Prospect

• Type trap: Combined (Stratigraphic & Structural)• Main Reservoir : Reservoir 1• Area P1 & Pmean : 1400 km² & 288 km²• Gross thickness: 144m• Net Reservoir: 55m• Seal : Seal 1• Well water depth: 354 m.b.s.l

42UNMSM - AAPG Student Chapter, Perú (Latin America & Caribbean Region)

Reservoir 1

Reservoir 1

10km

Reservoir 1 Depositional ModelMain Prospect Evaluated

III. PROSPECT FOCUS ANALYSIS

Agradational shelf facies on t-1 Well.

Lateral change of facies to the south

Analogy in a moderndepositional model

Suri-1 well

Suri-1 well

Suri-1 well

1 well

Stratigraphictrap

Resources and Risks

44

IV. PROSPECT FOCUS ANALYSIS Resources CalculatedLow Mean High

Area (Km2) 82 293.4 615

Gross Reservoir Volume 10 000 113 644 300 000

Net to Gross (%) 40 52.466

Net Reservoir (m) 20 57 976 95

Gas/Condensated from Primary Gas

Porosity 7.79 11.03 14.76

Water Saturation (Sw) 72.3 56.9 38.6

FVF 55 63.7 73

Bg 209.3 213 222.2

Condensate Yield (from Primary Gas) 70 81.2 93

Total condensate 79.63 1 083.59 2 936.8

Gas Originally in Place 1 619.74 20 298.43 55 150.33

TOTAL HC EQUIVALENT (MMBOE) 248.86 3 222.04 8 746.99

Variable features considered Prospect value

SOURCE ROCK Quality, Presence & Maturity 90%

RESERVOIR ROCK Quality & Presence 70%

TRAP Presence & Quality Data 70%

Seal Lateral and Top Sealing 70%

TIMING/ MIGRATION/ PRESERVATION COMPONENTS Timiing of trapping, trap, expulsion & migration 70%

Pg 26%

Resources Mean MMBOE3200

Chance of Success26%

Taranaki Field Size Distribution

45

Reservoir 1 Oil-Eq ReservesSuri Prospect has a high exploratory potential

IV. PROSPECT FOCUS ANALYSIS

Suri Prospect3222 MMBOE

46


Well Prognosis

PotentialDrilling HazardBased on T-1 WellHighgeopressures

Suri 1X

SURI-1 WELL PROGNOSIS

SSTVD

TD

CasingDesing

4 ½´´

16´

10 3/4´´

7 5/8´´

Exploration Activities based on Exploratory Potential and Economic Conditions

47


Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

Suri ProspectBuild prospect & lead inventory

Time depth mapping

Build prospect & lead inventory

Time depth mapping

Commit or Surrender

Drill one exploraroty well

Post well analysis

2016 201920182017

Suri Prospect Exploratory Work Programme (1st 4 year term)

Key

Complete

Commintted

Contingent

Exploratory well Appraisal well

Exploration Activities based on Exploratory Potential and Economic Conditions

48


2016

USD$40Suri Prospect

Segunda Etapa

¿Qué ganamos?

• Experiencia de trabajar en equipo

• Intercambiar conocimiento con otras universidades.

• Aprender a usar softwares necesarios para la industria de los hidrocarburos.

• Relaciones sociales con estudiantes de otra universidad.

Enseñanzas

¿Qué se aprendió?

• Se aprendió a trabajar bajo

presión ya que se tenia un corto

tiempo de entrega de trabajo.

• Se aprendió sobre el trabajo que

se hace en la Industria Petrolera.

¿Qué se necesita para ganar?

• COMPROMISO desde la etapa

inicial hasta la final del trabajo.

• Capacitaciones y cursos que

complementen la teoría que se

enseña en la universidad.

• Recursos suficientes para poder

optimizar el trabajo.

• Perseverancia.

• Dedicación.

• Trabajo en equipo.

MUCHAS GRACIAS POR SU ATENCIÓN

enseñanzas sobre el concurso el imperial barrel award...well prognosis potential drilling hazard...

Documents