envi 485 02/15/07 intro. to natural hazards & disasters steams and flooding case study 1

73
ENVI 485 02/15/07 • INTRO. TO NATURAL HAZARDS & DISASTERS • STEAMS AND FLOODING • Case Study 1

Upload: brendan-lee

Post on 20-Jan-2016

225 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: ENVI 485 02/15/07 INTRO. TO NATURAL HAZARDS & DISASTERS STEAMS AND FLOODING Case Study 1

ENVI 485 02/15/07• INTRO. TO NATURAL HAZARDS &

DISASTERS

• STEAMS AND FLOODING

• Case Study 1

Page 2: ENVI 485 02/15/07 INTRO. TO NATURAL HAZARDS & DISASTERS STEAMS AND FLOODING Case Study 1

Phase 1: Emergency(days)

• Normal activities stop

• Search and rescue

• Emergency shelter/feeding

• Capital damaged or destroyed

Page 3: ENVI 485 02/15/07 INTRO. TO NATURAL HAZARDS & DISASTERS STEAMS AND FLOODING Case Study 1

Phase 2: Restoration(weeks-months)

• Normal activities return but at minimal levels

• Restoration of urban services

• Return of refugees

• Capital patched

Page 4: ENVI 485 02/15/07 INTRO. TO NATURAL HAZARDS & DISASTERS STEAMS AND FLOODING Case Study 1

Phases 3 & 4: Reconstruction I & II

(months-years)• Normal activities return to predisaster levels

• Capital rebuilt (replaced)

• Activities improved and developed

• Capital improved beyond predisaster levels

• Disaster preparedness & response improved

Page 5: ENVI 485 02/15/07 INTRO. TO NATURAL HAZARDS & DISASTERS STEAMS AND FLOODING Case Study 1
Page 6: ENVI 485 02/15/07 INTRO. TO NATURAL HAZARDS & DISASTERS STEAMS AND FLOODING Case Study 1

Effects of Selected Hazards in the U.S.

Hazard Deaths/yr. occurrenceinfluenced byhumans?

Catastrophicpotential

flood 86 yes H

earthquake 50+ yes H

landslide 25 yes M

volcano 1 no H

coastalerosion

0 yes L

expansivesoils

0 no L

Page 7: ENVI 485 02/15/07 INTRO. TO NATURAL HAZARDS & DISASTERS STEAMS AND FLOODING Case Study 1

Effects of Selected Hazards in the U.S.

Hazard Deaths/yr. occurrenceinfluenced byhumans?

Catastrophicpotential

hurricane 55 no H

tornado 218 no H

lightning 120 ? L

drought 0 ? M

freeze 0 no L

Page 8: ENVI 485 02/15/07 INTRO. TO NATURAL HAZARDS & DISASTERS STEAMS AND FLOODING Case Study 1

Rivers and floods

Stream/river–any body of water that flows in a channel

Floods–any high flow of surface waters that overtops normal confinements or covers land normally dry

–most devastating of all geologic agents -in loss of life

Page 9: ENVI 485 02/15/07 INTRO. TO NATURAL HAZARDS & DISASTERS STEAMS AND FLOODING Case Study 1

Extent of a floodplain

Page 10: ENVI 485 02/15/07 INTRO. TO NATURAL HAZARDS & DISASTERS STEAMS AND FLOODING Case Study 1
Page 11: ENVI 485 02/15/07 INTRO. TO NATURAL HAZARDS & DISASTERS STEAMS AND FLOODING Case Study 1
Page 12: ENVI 485 02/15/07 INTRO. TO NATURAL HAZARDS & DISASTERS STEAMS AND FLOODING Case Study 1

Longitudinal Profile & Gadient

Page 13: ENVI 485 02/15/07 INTRO. TO NATURAL HAZARDS & DISASTERS STEAMS AND FLOODING Case Study 1

Drainage basin and cross sections at the headwater and near base level

Page 14: ENVI 485 02/15/07 INTRO. TO NATURAL HAZARDS & DISASTERS STEAMS AND FLOODING Case Study 1

Sediment in Rivers

•Stream total load Bed load: Coarse particles moving along the bottom of river channel Suspended load: Accounts for about 90% of its total load Dissolved load: Carried in chemical solutions

Page 15: ENVI 485 02/15/07 INTRO. TO NATURAL HAZARDS & DISASTERS STEAMS AND FLOODING Case Study 1

Show animation

Page 16: ENVI 485 02/15/07 INTRO. TO NATURAL HAZARDS & DISASTERS STEAMS AND FLOODING Case Study 1

Factors in Stream flow• Several basic factors control the way a stream

behaves:– Gradient [h/x] (expressed in meters per kilometers)

– Stream-cross-sectional area [A]• (width * average depth, expressed in square meters)

– Average velocity of water flow [v]• (expressed in meters per second)

– Discharge [Q] (expressed in cubic meters per second)– Load (expressed in kilograms per cubic meter)

• Dissolved matter generally does not affect stream behavior

Page 17: ENVI 485 02/15/07 INTRO. TO NATURAL HAZARDS & DISASTERS STEAMS AND FLOODING Case Study 1

Discharge, Velocity, & Channel Shape

• The relationship of discharge, velocity, and channel shape for a stream can be expressed by the equation:

Q = A * V

Discharge Cross-sectional Average

(m3/s) area of stream velocity

(width x average (m/s)

depth) (m2)

Page 18: ENVI 485 02/15/07 INTRO. TO NATURAL HAZARDS & DISASTERS STEAMS AND FLOODING Case Study 1
Page 19: ENVI 485 02/15/07 INTRO. TO NATURAL HAZARDS & DISASTERS STEAMS AND FLOODING Case Study 1

Flood stage

• The elevation (in meters, feet, etc.) of the water above normal at the highest point in the flood

Page 20: ENVI 485 02/15/07 INTRO. TO NATURAL HAZARDS & DISASTERS STEAMS AND FLOODING Case Study 1

Stream Gage

• USGS: 7000 nationwide

• Measures water level (gage height) every 15 minutes

• Sends data via satellite every 4 hours

• “rating curve” converts gage height to discharge

• Rating curve modifed after technition measures streamflow on site every 6 weeks

Page 21: ENVI 485 02/15/07 INTRO. TO NATURAL HAZARDS & DISASTERS STEAMS AND FLOODING Case Study 1

Measuring

Stream

Velocity

Page 22: ENVI 485 02/15/07 INTRO. TO NATURAL HAZARDS & DISASTERS STEAMS AND FLOODING Case Study 1

Calculating Discharge from a Stream GageVelocity X Area = Q

Page 23: ENVI 485 02/15/07 INTRO. TO NATURAL HAZARDS & DISASTERS STEAMS AND FLOODING Case Study 1

Rating curve

Page 24: ENVI 485 02/15/07 INTRO. TO NATURAL HAZARDS & DISASTERS STEAMS AND FLOODING Case Study 1

USGS National Streamflow Program

http://water.usgs.govhttp://waterdata.usgs.gov/ca/nwis/uv?11023000

Page 25: ENVI 485 02/15/07 INTRO. TO NATURAL HAZARDS & DISASTERS STEAMS AND FLOODING Case Study 1
Page 26: ENVI 485 02/15/07 INTRO. TO NATURAL HAZARDS & DISASTERS STEAMS AND FLOODING Case Study 1
Page 27: ENVI 485 02/15/07 INTRO. TO NATURAL HAZARDS & DISASTERS STEAMS AND FLOODING Case Study 1

San Diego River Watershed

Two USGS stream gages

•Fashion Valley: 429 sq. mi

Page 28: ENVI 485 02/15/07 INTRO. TO NATURAL HAZARDS & DISASTERS STEAMS AND FLOODING Case Study 1

Santee Stream Gage

Page 29: ENVI 485 02/15/07 INTRO. TO NATURAL HAZARDS & DISASTERS STEAMS AND FLOODING Case Study 1

482 Stream gages in CA

Page 30: ENVI 485 02/15/07 INTRO. TO NATURAL HAZARDS & DISASTERS STEAMS AND FLOODING Case Study 1
Page 31: ENVI 485 02/15/07 INTRO. TO NATURAL HAZARDS & DISASTERS STEAMS AND FLOODING Case Study 1
Page 32: ENVI 485 02/15/07 INTRO. TO NATURAL HAZARDS & DISASTERS STEAMS AND FLOODING Case Study 1
Page 33: ENVI 485 02/15/07 INTRO. TO NATURAL HAZARDS & DISASTERS STEAMS AND FLOODING Case Study 1
Page 34: ENVI 485 02/15/07 INTRO. TO NATURAL HAZARDS & DISASTERS STEAMS AND FLOODING Case Study 1
Page 35: ENVI 485 02/15/07 INTRO. TO NATURAL HAZARDS & DISASTERS STEAMS AND FLOODING Case Study 1
Page 36: ENVI 485 02/15/07 INTRO. TO NATURAL HAZARDS & DISASTERS STEAMS AND FLOODING Case Study 1

1927 Flood

• Photo taken on February 2, 1927 shows the Old Town railroad bridge washed out by the flood. This rail right-of-way still exists - you can see it looking east from I-5; Friars Rd. runs underneath it.

Page 37: ENVI 485 02/15/07 INTRO. TO NATURAL HAZARDS & DISASTERS STEAMS AND FLOODING Case Study 1

San Diego River

• 1852 - Since San Diego Bay was a deeper harbor, and the San Diego River carried heavy silt deposits, it was decided to deflect the San Diego River into False Bay (Mission Bay)

• The project was completed in two years by Indian laborers who reportedly hauled building materials in baskets. The Darby dike washed out one year after its completion and the San Diego River returned to its old course.

Page 38: ENVI 485 02/15/07 INTRO. TO NATURAL HAZARDS & DISASTERS STEAMS AND FLOODING Case Study 1

San Diego River

• 1862 – Possibly the largest flood in the history of the San Diego River occurred (almost 100,000 cfs).

• 1875- New dike constructed (cobblestone face two to three feet thick). A small channel was constructed on the north side of the dike that the river was diverted into the eastern part of Mission Bay.

Page 39: ENVI 485 02/15/07 INTRO. TO NATURAL HAZARDS & DISASTERS STEAMS AND FLOODING Case Study 1

River Erosion

•Erosion types Abrasion by sediments transported by river Hydraulic action of moving water Chemical corrosion

•Erosion location Down cutting Lateral: Concentrating on the outer bends Headward erosion

Page 40: ENVI 485 02/15/07 INTRO. TO NATURAL HAZARDS & DISASTERS STEAMS AND FLOODING Case Study 1

Meandering River, showing forms and processes

Page 41: ENVI 485 02/15/07 INTRO. TO NATURAL HAZARDS & DISASTERS STEAMS AND FLOODING Case Study 1

Meander on the Colorado River

Page 42: ENVI 485 02/15/07 INTRO. TO NATURAL HAZARDS & DISASTERS STEAMS AND FLOODING Case Study 1

Erosion

Page 43: ENVI 485 02/15/07 INTRO. TO NATURAL HAZARDS & DISASTERS STEAMS AND FLOODING Case Study 1

Koyakuk River, Alaska, showing meander bends, point bar, and cut bank

Page 44: ENVI 485 02/15/07 INTRO. TO NATURAL HAZARDS & DISASTERS STEAMS AND FLOODING Case Study 1

Show animation

Page 45: ENVI 485 02/15/07 INTRO. TO NATURAL HAZARDS & DISASTERS STEAMS AND FLOODING Case Study 1
Page 46: ENVI 485 02/15/07 INTRO. TO NATURAL HAZARDS & DISASTERS STEAMS AND FLOODING Case Study 1

Braided channels in Granada, southern Spain with multiple channels, steep gradient, and coarse gravel

Page 47: ENVI 485 02/15/07 INTRO. TO NATURAL HAZARDS & DISASTERS STEAMS AND FLOODING Case Study 1
Page 48: ENVI 485 02/15/07 INTRO. TO NATURAL HAZARDS & DISASTERS STEAMS AND FLOODING Case Study 1

Effects of Land-Use Changes

•Changes in infiltration rate: Change of the amount of water flowing into a river

•Soil erosion: Change in the amount of sediments in a river

•Amount of water and sediments in river: Changes in the velocity of water flow

•Changes in river’s velocity: Leading the change in river dynamics

Page 49: ENVI 485 02/15/07 INTRO. TO NATURAL HAZARDS & DISASTERS STEAMS AND FLOODING Case Study 1

Effects of Land-Use Changes

•Forest to farmland Increases soil erosion, stream deposition Increases gradient and velocity Increases river-channel erosion

•Urban build-up Increases impervious cover Increases certain flood frequency Reduces the lag time of flood

Page 50: ENVI 485 02/15/07 INTRO. TO NATURAL HAZARDS & DISASTERS STEAMS AND FLOODING Case Study 1

Floods

In

The US

Page 51: ENVI 485 02/15/07 INTRO. TO NATURAL HAZARDS & DISASTERS STEAMS AND FLOODING Case Study 1

Flooding

•Flooding: Overbank flow condition, discharge greater than channel’s holding capacity

•Stage: The height of the water level in a river at a given location at a given time

•Hydrograph: a graph that plots stream discharge (Q) against time (t)

•Lag time: The amount of time between the occurrence of peak rainfall and the onset of flooding

Page 52: ENVI 485 02/15/07 INTRO. TO NATURAL HAZARDS & DISASTERS STEAMS AND FLOODING Case Study 1

Flood magnitude

• Recurrence interval– Discharge (Q) on a stream is measured over a period of

time (N)– Each flood is ranked (highest discharge = 1) (M)– Recurrence interval: (N + 1)/M

• Probability of a flood of a given magnitude in a year is 1/recurrence interval

Page 53: ENVI 485 02/15/07 INTRO. TO NATURAL HAZARDS & DISASTERS STEAMS AND FLOODING Case Study 1
Page 54: ENVI 485 02/15/07 INTRO. TO NATURAL HAZARDS & DISASTERS STEAMS AND FLOODING Case Study 1
Page 55: ENVI 485 02/15/07 INTRO. TO NATURAL HAZARDS & DISASTERS STEAMS AND FLOODING Case Study 1

Example of a discharge-frequency curve for Patrick River

Page 56: ENVI 485 02/15/07 INTRO. TO NATURAL HAZARDS & DISASTERS STEAMS AND FLOODING Case Study 1
Page 57: ENVI 485 02/15/07 INTRO. TO NATURAL HAZARDS & DISASTERS STEAMS AND FLOODING Case Study 1

Urban development and flooding

• Flooding usually increased by urban development – Affected by impervious cover

– Storm sewers• More water reaches stream

• Water reaches stream faster

• Affects the relationship between rainfall-runoff– Reduced lag time = “flashy discharge”

Page 58: ENVI 485 02/15/07 INTRO. TO NATURAL HAZARDS & DISASTERS STEAMS AND FLOODING Case Study 1
Page 59: ENVI 485 02/15/07 INTRO. TO NATURAL HAZARDS & DISASTERS STEAMS AND FLOODING Case Study 1
Page 60: ENVI 485 02/15/07 INTRO. TO NATURAL HAZARDS & DISASTERS STEAMS AND FLOODING Case Study 1

Smaller floods are more affected by urbanization than larger floods

Page 61: ENVI 485 02/15/07 INTRO. TO NATURAL HAZARDS & DISASTERS STEAMS AND FLOODING Case Study 1

Mean annual flood: RI = 2.23

Page 62: ENVI 485 02/15/07 INTRO. TO NATURAL HAZARDS & DISASTERS STEAMS AND FLOODING Case Study 1
Page 63: ENVI 485 02/15/07 INTRO. TO NATURAL HAZARDS & DISASTERS STEAMS AND FLOODING Case Study 1
Page 64: ENVI 485 02/15/07 INTRO. TO NATURAL HAZARDS & DISASTERS STEAMS AND FLOODING Case Study 1

Effect of dam on erosion

Page 65: ENVI 485 02/15/07 INTRO. TO NATURAL HAZARDS & DISASTERS STEAMS AND FLOODING Case Study 1
Page 66: ENVI 485 02/15/07 INTRO. TO NATURAL HAZARDS & DISASTERS STEAMS AND FLOODING Case Study 1
Page 67: ENVI 485 02/15/07 INTRO. TO NATURAL HAZARDS & DISASTERS STEAMS AND FLOODING Case Study 1

Regulation of the Floodplain

• Floodplain belongs to the river system and the river WILL reoccupy it.

• Flood hazard mapping– Floodway & floodway fringe district

• Area of the floodplain covered by a 100 year flood• O.k. for some uses

Page 68: ENVI 485 02/15/07 INTRO. TO NATURAL HAZARDS & DISASTERS STEAMS AND FLOODING Case Study 1

Adjustments to Flood Hazards

•The structural approach Engineering barriers: Levee augmentation Channelization River-channel restoration

•Flood insurance

•Flood-proofing

Page 69: ENVI 485 02/15/07 INTRO. TO NATURAL HAZARDS & DISASTERS STEAMS AND FLOODING Case Study 1

Floodplain without and with levees

Page 70: ENVI 485 02/15/07 INTRO. TO NATURAL HAZARDS & DISASTERS STEAMS AND FLOODING Case Study 1

07_28b Placing riprap to defend the bank

Page 71: ENVI 485 02/15/07 INTRO. TO NATURAL HAZARDS & DISASTERS STEAMS AND FLOODING Case Study 1

Natural vs. channelized stream

Page 72: ENVI 485 02/15/07 INTRO. TO NATURAL HAZARDS & DISASTERS STEAMS AND FLOODING Case Study 1

Concrete channel in LA

Page 73: ENVI 485 02/15/07 INTRO. TO NATURAL HAZARDS & DISASTERS STEAMS AND FLOODING Case Study 1

07_28a Urban stream restoration by controlling erosion and deposition