epnosl period 3 kick off meeting management and administrative issues (9:00-9:45, 27.03.2014 )
DESCRIPTION
EPNoSL Period 3 Kick Off Meeting Management and Administrative Issues (9:00-9:45, 27.03.2014 ). Brussels, Belgium - March 26-27, 2013 By Kathy Kikis-Papadakis [email protected]. A.Management Groups. PMC - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
http://www.schoolleadership.eu
EPNoSL Period 3 Kick Off MeetingMANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATIVE ISSUES (9:00-9:45, 27.03.2014)
Brussels, Belgium - March 26-27, 2013
By Kathy [email protected]
http://www.schoolleadership.eu
March 27, 2014 2
• PMC▫Members: FORTH (P1), NQL Hildesheim(P4),
TPF (P10), ESHA (P24), ULHT (P26), IBE (P35) and NEC (P36)
• Advisory Board▫Members: GTC Scotland – Coordinator (P14),
EFEE (P15), ETUCE (P25), OND Vlaanderen (P29), MEC PT (P31), EPA (P30) and MIUR (P42)
• Scientific Advisory Group▫Members: Michael Schratz (P8), Olof Johansson
(P11), Lejf Moos (P16), Philip Woods (P22) and representative of the Slovenian Ministry of Education, Science and Sport
A. Management Groups
http://www.schoolleadership.eu
March 27, 2014 3
•Upgraded version by May 11th, 2014▫Financial Reporting (reference to an
contractual obligations)▫Partnership Agreements▫Obligations of the Coordinator and of the
Partners (Financial Reporting)▫Evaluation Requirements▫Work Plan Execution▫Reporting
I. Interim: 13/6/2014 (to be submitted 11/7/2014)II. Final: 17/07/2015 (workplan related) and
24/07/2015 (Financial statement and reporting) – to be submitted 11/8/2015
B. Management Guide (internal space)
http://www.schoolleadership.eu
March 27, 2014 4
•24/7/2015 by partners▫as per requirements already communicated
C. Financial Reporting
http://www.schoolleadership.eu
March 27, 2014 5
•We have approx. 50%
•Kathy returns these to partners
D. Partnership Agreements(as per list PA)
http://www.schoolleadership.eu
March 27, 2014 6
E1. The role of the partners▫Summary of tasks and budget info
(handout)▫CD: Containing info on Project related
issues, Contract related materials and Second Period’s Outputs (all alike, Kathy hand out to partners)
E2. Coordinator’s Role▫As per WP1 and Contractual Obligations
E. Roles of partners and coordinator
http://www.schoolleadership.eu
March 27, 2014 7
•Internal Project Evaluation•Impact Evaluation (Gerry works with
Advisory Group)•Coherence between the State of the Art
and the EPNoSL approach (Jacky works with Scientific Group)
F. Evaluation Requirements(see Reflection tool #A7 of CD)
http://www.schoolleadership.eu
March 27, 2014 8
•All dels and other contents to FORTH. Evaluation Group Assesses before submission
G. Reporting
http://www.schoolleadership.eu
March 27, 2014 9
• Reflections on EC’s clarification requirements on EPNoSL 2014 Work Programme\▫ Q.A. (to include RISK ASSESSMENT)▫ How do we enlarge the Network (geographical + profiles of
stakeholders + how they get involved)▫ Meaning of toolbox (WP2)▫ Testing of resources / tools (how and why)▫ Profiles of webinars participants (representatives of
institutions?) (WP3)▫ Planning of Networking events (Number / country / profiles)▫ Meaning of structuring and culturing (WP4)▫ Elaboration on Action Plans (Regional Learning Traditions vs
Generic Action Plans) (WP4)▫ How will the Ministries involvement be secured(WP5)▫ How is the PMC organized (Ministries involvement)▫ Sustainability EC, National, and other levels
H. EPNoSL Response to EC questions(Feb 19th meeting related)
http://www.schoolleadership.eu
March 27, 2014 10
The floor to Jacky and Gerry
I. Evaluation Concerns and Proposals