etec 512 thought paper 3

3
 Thought Paper #3: On Co nstructivism Brett Williams Student #: 87701124 ETEC 512 Sunday, July 14, 2013

Upload: brett

Post on 02-Nov-2015

77 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

A short paper on constructivism.

TRANSCRIPT

  • Thought Paper #3: On Constructivism

    Brett Williams

    Student #: 87701124

    ETEC 512

    Sunday, July 14, 2013

  • 2

    In his article on constructivist theory, von Glasersfeld (2008) ruminates on the

    individuals perception of reality and construction of knowledge through experience,

    culminating in the paradox that " to assess the truth of your knowledge you would have

    to know what you come to know before you come to know it." Of course, there is no way

    for us to know the truth of what something is, without knowing what it is to do so, we

    require assistance to contextualize what it is needed to be learned. We need guidance

    from someone who does an elder sibling, a parent, a teacher who can provide us with

    the necessary context and language in which to comprehend the meaning of that

    knowledge.

    My understanding of von Glasersfelds paradox connects directly to the

    fundamentals of constructivist theory, which posits that the student should be at the

    center of his or her learning. He states "that knowledge is not a transferable commodity

    and communication not a conveyance, thereby arguing that students are more than mere

    receptacles for knowledge waiting to be filled with information that the teacher deems

    important. Rather they should be seen as active participants engaged in the development

    of their understanding. As von Glasersfeld cautions, however, this does not altogether

    suggest that the teacher is an absentee figure in a childs learning, but acts as a guide to

    assess where the child is currently in their development, and what tools and experiences

    they will require in order to master new skills. This notion seems to be inspired by

    Vygotskys (1996) zone of proximal development, which places an emphasis on the role

    of the teacher or more capable peers providing the necessary scaffolding for a child to

    move from his current level of mastery to the next.

  • 3

    References

    John-Steiner, V. & Mahn, H. (1996). Sociocultural approaches to learning and

    development: A Vygotskian framework, Educational Psychologist, 31, 191-206.

    Von Glasersfeld, E. (2008). Learning as a constructive activity. AntiMatters, 2(3), 33-

    49.