european space program 50+ years of successful european...
TRANSCRIPT
ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use
ERTS2 - 2016
K. Hjortnaes Toulouse 27/01/2016
European Space program 50+ years of successful European collaboration
Kjeld Hjortnaes Head of Software Systems Division
ESA/ESTEC
European Space, facts and figures
ERTS2 - 2016 | K. Hjortnaes | Toulouse | 27/01/2016 | Slide 2
ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use
• Over 50 years of experience
• 22 Member States
• Eight sites/facilities in Europe, about 2200 staff
• 4.4 billion Euro budget (2015)
• Over 80 satellites designed, tested and operated in flight
• Over 20 scientific satellites in operation
• Six types of launcher developed
ESA FACTS AND FIGURES
ERTS2 - 2016 | K. Hjortnaes | Toulouse | 27/01/2016 | Slide 3
ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use
“To provide for and promote, for exclusively peaceful
purposes, cooperation among European states in space research and technology and their space
applications.”
Article 2 of ESA Convention
PURPOSE OF ESA
ERTS2 - 2016 | K. Hjortnaes | Toulouse | 27/01/2016 | Slide 4
ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use
ESA has 22 Member States: 18 states of the EU (AT, BE, CZ, DE, DK, ES, FI, FR, IT, GR, IE, LU, NL, PT, PL, RO, SE, UK) plus Norway and Switzerland. Estonia and Hungary are joining ESA in 2015. Seven other EU states have Cooperation Agreements with ESA: Bulgaria, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, Slovakia and Slovenia. Discussions are ongoing with Croatia. Canada takes part in some programmes under a long-standing Cooperation Agreement.
22 MEMBER STATES
ERTS2 - 2016 | K. Hjortnaes | Toulouse | 27/01/2016 | Slide 5
ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use
Houston
Washington
Kourou
Moscow
ESA sites/facilities
Offices
ESTEC (Noordwijk)
Brussels ESA HQ (Paris)
Toulouse
ESAC (Madrid) ESRIN
(Rome)
EAC (Cologne)
ESOC (Darmstadt)
ESA’S LOCATIONS
ECSAT (Harwell)
Redu
Salmijaervi (Kiruna)
ESA ground stations
New Norcia
Santa Maria
Cebreros, Villafranca
Oberpfaffenhofen
Maspalomas
Perth Malargüe
ERTS2 - 2016 | K. Hjortnaes | Toulouse | 27/01/2016 | Slide 6
ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use
Budget 2015 4433.0 M€
ESA 2015 BUDGET BY DOMAIN
Technology support* 2.4%, 105.3 M€
Navigation* 15.0%, 664.5 M€
M€: Million Euro
*includes Programmes implemented for other Institutional Partners
Robotic Exploration & Prodex
3.5%, 155.8 M€
Human Spaceflight 8.4%, 371.4 M€
Launchers 13.7%, 607.7 M€
Telecom & Integrated Applications*
7.0%, 309.2 M€
Earth Observation* 28.3%, 1254.3 M€
Scientific Programme 11.5%, 507.9 M€
Associated with General Budget
4.7%, 209.0 M€
Basic Activities 5.2%, 232.1 M€
European Cooperating States Agreement
(ECSA) 0.05%, 2.0 M€
Space Situational Awareness 0.3%, 13.9 M€
ERTS2 - 2016 | K. Hjortnaes | Toulouse | 27/01/2016 | Slide 7
ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use
• The ESA space program 4433.0 M€, = 8.84 € / European / year
(Big Mac Eurozone average €3.72 – (Jan-2016))
• The US civil space program 17460 M$ = 54.33$ /American / year
(Big Mac US $4.93 – (Jan-2016)
Civil space program - compared
Source: Economist, Big Mac index 2015
ERTS2 - 2016 | K. Hjortnaes | Toulouse | 27/01/2016 | Slide 8
ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use
World wide
1. The space economy (2013) worldwide represent 256 billion USD
2. Space manufacturing 84 billion USD
Source: OECD, the Space Economy 2014
ERTS2 - 2016 | K. Hjortnaes | Toulouse | 27/01/2016 | Slide 9
ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use
Governmental budgets - World vide
• The US gov. space budget (civil + defense) is larger than the rest of the world – together
• Only 3 countries spent more than 0.1% of GDP (US(0.23%), RUS(0.25), F(0.1%) of the GDP in 2013)
Source: Statista 2016
ERTS2 - 2016 | K. Hjortnaes | Toulouse | 27/01/2016 | Slide 10
ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use
investment in space applications
1$=6.58 CNY)
ERTS2 - 2016 | K. Hjortnaes | Toulouse | 27/01/2016 | Slide 11
ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use
Scientific output.
ERTS2 - 2016 | K. Hjortnaes | Toulouse | 27/01/2016 | Slide 12
ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use
… and in which areas
ERTS2 - 2016 | K. Hjortnaes | Toulouse | 27/01/2016 | Slide 13
ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use
…and by country
ERTS2 - 2016 | K. Hjortnaes | Toulouse | 27/01/2016 | Slide 14
ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use
… by centers
ERTS2 - 2016 | K. Hjortnaes | Toulouse | 27/01/2016 | Slide 16
ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use
Esa’s technology program
1. Enabling ESA future science and service driven missions, launchers and infrastructure, but also fostering innovation and technical excellence, assuring
a. non-dependence on critical space technologies .
b. transferring technology from space to non-space applications (‘spin-off’),
c. bringing innovations from outside the space sector to use in the design of new space systems (‘spin-in’)
2. Improve the way we deliver space systems
a. Develop the technology to make it possible.
b. Support European Space Industry in its competiveness in a world market
ERTS2 - 2016 | K. Hjortnaes | Toulouse | 27/01/2016 | Slide 17
ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use
Trends/Needs in European Space
Examples from systems and avionics domain;
1. Evolve System Engineering and Cross Sectorial collaboration.
a. Transition to Model Based Engineering / Virtual design/ digital mock-up / design analysis by simulation will evolve.
2. Support the transition towards product orientation rather than custom design (in particular for Telecom and Earth observation).
3. Integrated applications based on heterogeneous data from multiple sources will create new business opportunities for value-added products/services. (big data)
ERTS2 - 2016 | K. Hjortnaes | Toulouse | 27/01/2016 | Slide 18
ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use
European Space technology budgets
640 M€ total institutional R&D budget (ESA, National, EC)
of which 480 M€ are ESA R&D budgets.
In support of a 4 B€ investments in missions / launchers / space infrastructures developments and in European industry’s competitiveness.
Source: Member States and European Cooperating States declared data
ERTS2 - 2016 | K. Hjortnaes | Toulouse | 27/01/2016 | Slide 19
ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use
Technical Domains (TDs)
1. On-board Data Systems/Avionics
2. Space System Software
3. Spacecraft Power
4. Spacecraft Environment & Effects
5. Space System Control
6. RF Payload Systems
7. Electromagnetics Technology
8. System Design & Verification
9. Mission operation and Ground Data Systems
10. Flight Dynamics and GNSS
11. Space Debris
12. Ground Station Systems and Networks
14. Automation, Telepresence & Robotics
15. Mechanisms & Tribology
16. Optics
17. Opto-Electronics
18. Aerothermodynamics
19. Propulsion
20. Structures & Pyrotechnics
21. Thermal
22. Environmental Control Life Support (ECLS) and ISRU
24. Materials & Processes
25. Quality, Dependability and Safety Cross sectorial
26. Spacecraft Avionic System
27. End to End System Engineering Processes
28. Electronic Components
29. Clean Space
30. Space and Energy
ERTS2 - 2016 | K. Hjortnaes | Toulouse | 27/01/2016 | Slide 20
ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use
ESA R&D programs / versus TRL levels
TRP
(Bas
ic Te
chno
logy
Rese
arch
Pro
gram
me)
GSTP
(Gen
eral
Sup
port
Tech
nolo
gy P
rogr
amm
e)CT
P (S
cienc
e Co
re
Tech
nolo
gy P
rogr
amm
e)
EOEP
(Ear
th O
bser
vatio
n
Enve
lope
Pro
gram
me)
ARTE
S ( A
dvan
ced
Rese
arch
in T
elec
om sy
sGN
SS Ev
olut
ion
(EGE
P)FL
PP (F
utur
e La
unch
ers
Prep
arat
ory P
rogr
amm
e)ET
P (E
xplo
ratio
n
Tech
nolo
gy P
rogr
amm
e)ET
HEP
( Eur
opea
n
Tran
sp. A
nd H
um e
xpl.)
Gen
eric
Gen
eric
(o
ptio
nal)
Scie
nce
Eart
h ob
s
Tele
com
Nav
igat
ion
laun
cher
s
Robo
tic
Hum
an
expl
.
ERTS2 - 2016 | K. Hjortnaes | Toulouse | 27/01/2016 | Slide 21
ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use
SYSTEM ENGINEERING PROCESS
Cross sectorial collaboration
ERTS2 - 2016 | K. Hjortnaes | Toulouse | 27/01/2016 | Slide 22
ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use
System Engineering process
1. State the problem. It entails understanding customer needs, establishing the need for change, discovering requirements and defining system functions.
2. Investigate alternatives. Alternatives are investigated and evaluated based on performance, cost and risk.
3. Model the system. Running models clarifies requirements, reveals bottlenecks and fragmented activities, reduces cost and exposes duplication of efforts.
4. Integrate. Integration means designing interfaces and bringing system elements together so they work as a whole.
5. Launch the system. Launching the system means running the system and producing outputs -- making the system do what it was intended to do.
6. Assess performance. Performance is assessed using evaluation criteria, technical performance measures and measures -- measurement is the key. If you cannot measure it, you cannot control it. If you cannot control it, you cannot improve it.
7. Re-evaluation. Re-evaluation should be a continual and iterative process with many parallel loops.
The Sixth Annual Symposium of the International Council on Systems Engineering (INCOSE), July 7-11, 1996
ERTS2 - 2016 | K. Hjortnaes | Toulouse | 27/01/2016 | Slide 23
ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use
Analysis
Domain analysis
Model based system engineering and system data repository.
System engineering
team
• System architect • System Engineers / • Domain experts
Mission / system requirements
- Architecture - Specifications - Interface spec’s - Plan’s - Cost ..
Domain analysis Domain
analysis Domain analysis Domain
analysis Domain engineering
Proposed solution
- Architecture refinement (sub-sys-level) - Req. refinement (functional/performance) - Analysis
Customer Supplier
System
data repository
- Each domain has own specific modeling, analysis or simulation tools with their own data representation
- Several modeling tools available.
- SysML is one, but not used systematically
- Concept modeling (several approaches and methods are practiced)
ERTS2 - 2016 | K. Hjortnaes | Toulouse | 27/01/2016 | Slide 24
ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use
End-to-end Model-Based Engineering Process
Mission Need
Phase A
Phase B
Phase C
Phase D
Phase E Feasibility Study
Conceptual Design
System / Preliminary Design
Detailed Design
Manufacturing
Assembly
Integration
Verification
Deployment
Validation
Top-Down Design
Bottom-Up Production, V&V
(Development & Qualification)
Model-based Validation & Verification
Design feedback and process improvement
Operations AIV Anomalies Analyses Simulations
ERTS2 - 2016 | K. Hjortnaes | Toulouse | 27/01/2016 | Slide 25
ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use
Consequence of not getting it right
Src: Richard Beasley, Andy J. Nolan and Andrew C. Pickard Rolls-Royce plc ; When “Yes” is the Wrong Answer; - INCOSE-2014
ERTS2 - 2016 | K. Hjortnaes | Toulouse | 27/01/2016 | Slide 26
ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use
SAVOIR / EGS-CC
Cross sectorial collaboration
Joint undertakings
ERTS2 - 2016 | K. Hjortnaes | Toulouse | 27/01/2016 | Slide 27
ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use
Avionics Embedded systems
Avionics Embedded Systems dossier: roadmap listing Avionics level cross-sectorial activities and sectorial activities with a cross-sectorial scope
Data Systems Data Systems and On-Board Computers dossier – refers to (D) for Avionics level activities
Control Systems Software Systems
On-board Payload Data Processing Dossier – idem
Microelectronics Dossier – idem
Data Systems sectorial activities with an Avionics level scope defined in AES dossier (D)
On-Board Software sectorial activities with an Avionics level scope defined in AES dossier (S)
Control Systems sectorial activities with an Avionics level scope defined in AES dossier (C)
On-board Software dossier
refers to (S) for Avionics level activities
AOCS Sensors and Actuators dossier
refers to (C) for Avionics level activities
ERTS2 - 2016 | K. Hjortnaes | Toulouse | 27/01/2016 | Slide 28
ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use
SAVOIR – the joint undertaking
SAVOIR means Space Avionics Open Interface aRchitecture. An initiative to federate the European Space Avionics Community and
together improve the way we build Spacecraft avionics.
SAVOIR objectives: 1. Improve the way we deliver space systems
2. Support industrial competitiveness
3. Enhance product orientation
SAVOIR is coordinated by the Savoir Advisory Group (SAG) including representative of; 1. Agencies: ESA, CNES, DLR
2. Large Satellite Integrators: Airbus-DS, Thales Alenia Space, OHB
3. Avionics HW and SW suppliers: RUAG, Selex Galileo, Terma
ERTS2 - 2016 | K. Hjortnaes | Toulouse | 27/01/2016 | Slide 29
ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use
Product orientation
Improve the way we deliver Space Systems (cost & schedule) by
Pre-developed Products / Building Blocks based on
well defined Specification & Interfaces based on
an agreed Reference Architecture
ERTS2 - 2016 | K. Hjortnaes | Toulouse | 27/01/2016 | Slide 31
ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use
THE EUROPEAN GROUND SYSTEM - COMMON CORE
ERTS2 - 2016 | K. Hjortnaes | Toulouse | 27/01/2016 | Slide 32
ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use
European Ground Systems – Common Core (EGS-CC)
Joint undertaking led by ESA (ESTEC & ESOC) together with European Primes and National Space Agencies.
ERTS2 - 2016 | K. Hjortnaes | Toulouse | 27/01/2016 | Slide 33
ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use
European Ground Systems – Common Core (EGS-CC)
Motivation
1. To develop and maintain a European Ground System Common Core (EGS-CC) for the next generation MCS/EGSE systems for the benefit of end-to-end usage (AIV/OPS)
2. Ensure interoperability of facilities between project phases and between programs (institutional and/or commercial).
3. Ensure a maximum commonality between EGSE and MCS, including common data and procedures.
4. Support the competitiveness of European Industry when supplying end-to-end space systems on the world market.
5. Profit from sharing development, validation, sustaining and maintenance.
6. Cost and risk reduction when implementing space projects.
7. Allow small and medium enterprises ("SME’s") to operate in a product oriented market, supplying quality products within a standardised context.
ERTS2 - 2016 | K. Hjortnaes | Toulouse | 27/01/2016 | Slide 34
ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use
Scope of EGS-CC Product, System and Test Facility
Reference Implemen-
tation Kernel Reference
Test Facility EGS-CC Product
EGS-CC System
EGS-CC Test Facility
Application specific
implementations
Specific Models & Tools
ERTS2 - 2016 | K. Hjortnaes | Toulouse | 27/01/2016 | Slide 35
ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use
European Union – Artemis –JU / ECSEL Digital technology
Digital technology being;
• Hardware
• Software
• IT services
• Internal IT
• Embedded software in ‘vertical markets’ like automotive, healthcare, etc.
The main conclusions, in hard figures (2013):
The global market of Digital Technology is estimated at USD 3,300 billion, corresponding to around 50 million jobs (of which 44Mil are in SW)
The share of Europe in Digital Technologies is about 9.1 million jobs.
Europe’s position is characterised by a strong presence in vertical markets.
In Europe we have 0.2 million jobs in hardware, including semiconductors, and 8.9 million jobs in software and services
ERTS2 - 2016 | K. Hjortnaes | Toulouse | 27/01/2016 | Slide 36
ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use
Hype Cycle for Emerging Technologies
Source: Gartner's 2015 Hype Cycle for Emerging Technologies
ERTS2 - 2016 | K. Hjortnaes | Toulouse | 27/01/2016 | Slide 37
ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use
Thank you for your attention