1. Evaluating Educational Technology Project using ACTIONS MODEL Done by: Athra ALYazeedi (61542) Fatma ALNaabi(66754)

2. Screen Shots

3. Screen Shots

4. Screen Shots

5. Overview

• Project Title: creating annual calendar using Desktop Publishing software.

• Background: This project was designed to educate grade eight students in how to use Microsoft Publisher to create their own annual calendar.

6. Goal and Objectives

• By the end of this lesson the Students will be able to:

• Goal:

• • Create an annual calendar.

• Enabling objectives:

• • Open the annual calendar from publisher catalog.

• • Change the annual calendar start and end date.

• • Change the annual calendar templates.

• • Change the annual calendar template colors.

• • Change the annual calendar fonts styles

• • Embed the events table.

7. Evaluation model & instrument

• ACTION model proposed used to evaluate to evaluate the annual calendar project.

• The evaluation concentrated in 3 parts:

• • Accessibility

• • Interactivity and User friendless

• • Teaching and Learning.

8. Evaluation model & instrument

• Access:

• The examiners should evaluate:

• • Do students have an access to the program CD?

• • Are the students equipped with the hardware requirements (computer, speakers, ..etc)?

• • Do students have the supportive software needed to run the program (e.g flash player)?

• • Is the program easy to run and use?

• This aspect will be best evaluated using students survey.

9. Evaluation model & instrument

• Teaching and Learning:

• The examiners should evaluate:

• • Do the instructional approach chosen appropriately to meet the students needs?

• • To what extent the program meet the learning objectives?

• • Is the content will adapted to the technology used?

• • How successfully the program develops the students required skills and knowledge?

• • Do the learning materials structured properly to the students capabilities?

• This aspect should be evaluated by achievement test and observation.

10. Evaluation model & instrument

• Interactivity and user friendliness

• The examiners should evaluate:

• • Does this technology support student-content interaction?

• • Does this technology support student-student interaction?

• • Does this technology support student-teacher interaction?

• • Does this technology support student-machine interaction?

• • Does the program easy to navigate and use?

• • Does the program interface reflect its content?

• Is the program instructionally designed?