evaluation of reduced fall-timed, tillage operations · net canopy treatment yield % cover tillage...

22
Evaluation of Reduced Fall-Timed, Tillage Operations Gene Miyao, UC Farm Advisor, Yolo, Solano & Sacramento counties Jeff Mitchell, Veg Crops Specialist, UC Davis Tim Hartz, Veg Crops Specialist, UC Davis Shrini Upadhyaya & Leroy Garciano, Ag Engineering Dept, UCD

Upload: others

Post on 25-Aug-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Evaluation of Reduced Fall-Timed, Tillage Operations · Net canopy Treatment Yield % cover Tillage (Tons/A) color Brix sun lumens Standard Till Chisel Center 23.8 22.9 6.2 23 0.117

Evaluation of Reduced Fall-Timed, Tillage Operations

Gene Miyao, UC Farm Advisor, Yolo, Solano & Sacramento countiesJeff Mitchell, Veg Crops Specialist, UC DavisTim Hartz, Veg Crops Specialist, UC DavisShrini Upadhyaya & Leroy Garciano, Ag Engineering Dept, UCD

Page 2: Evaluation of Reduced Fall-Timed, Tillage Operations · Net canopy Treatment Yield % cover Tillage (Tons/A) color Brix sun lumens Standard Till Chisel Center 23.8 22.9 6.2 23 0.117

Approaching No-Till:Fresh Market tomatoesw/ buried drip irrigation

Major Challenges for Processingtomato growers:

Furrow irrigation w/ high residueWeed control w/out cultivationMechanical harvest w/ residue

& minimally disturbed soils

Page 3: Evaluation of Reduced Fall-Timed, Tillage Operations · Net canopy Treatment Yield % cover Tillage (Tons/A) color Brix sun lumens Standard Till Chisel Center 23.8 22.9 6.2 23 0.117
Page 4: Evaluation of Reduced Fall-Timed, Tillage Operations · Net canopy Treatment Yield % cover Tillage (Tons/A) color Brix sun lumens Standard Till Chisel Center 23.8 22.9 6.2 23 0.117
Page 5: Evaluation of Reduced Fall-Timed, Tillage Operations · Net canopy Treatment Yield % cover Tillage (Tons/A) color Brix sun lumens Standard Till Chisel Center 23.8 22.9 6.2 23 0.117
Page 6: Evaluation of Reduced Fall-Timed, Tillage Operations · Net canopy Treatment Yield % cover Tillage (Tons/A) color Brix sun lumens Standard Till Chisel Center 23.8 22.9 6.2 23 0.117

Fall-Timed, Primary TILLAGE

STANDARDTILLAGE

REDUCEDTILLAGE

Page 7: Evaluation of Reduced Fall-Timed, Tillage Operations · Net canopy Treatment Yield % cover Tillage (Tons/A) color Brix sun lumens Standard Till Chisel Center 23.8 22.9 6.2 23 0.117

Fall-Timed TILLAGE

STANDARDTILLAGE

REDUCEDTILLAGE

TRITICALE COVERCROP

CENTER BEDCHISEL

FALLOW(Conventional)A

B

C

Page 8: Evaluation of Reduced Fall-Timed, Tillage Operations · Net canopy Treatment Yield % cover Tillage (Tons/A) color Brix sun lumens Standard Till Chisel Center 23.8 22.9 6.2 23 0.117

Fall-Timed TILLAGE

STANDARDTILLAGE

REDUCEDTILLAGE

TRITICALE COVERCROP

CENTER BEDCHISEL

FALLOW(Conventional)

TRITICALE COVERCROP

CENTER BEDCHISEL

FALLOW(Conventional)

A

B

C

A

B

C

Page 9: Evaluation of Reduced Fall-Timed, Tillage Operations · Net canopy Treatment Yield % cover Tillage (Tons/A) color Brix sun lumens Standard Till Chisel Center 23.8 22.9 6.2 23 0.117
Page 10: Evaluation of Reduced Fall-Timed, Tillage Operations · Net canopy Treatment Yield % cover Tillage (Tons/A) color Brix sun lumens Standard Till Chisel Center 23.8 22.9 6.2 23 0.117
Page 11: Evaluation of Reduced Fall-Timed, Tillage Operations · Net canopy Treatment Yield % cover Tillage (Tons/A) color Brix sun lumens Standard Till Chisel Center 23.8 22.9 6.2 23 0.117

Net canopyTreatment Yield % coverTillage (Tons/A) color Brix sun lumensStandard Till Chisel Center 23.8 22.9 6.2 23 0.117Standard Till none 25.2 23.0 5.9 20 0.114Reduced Till Chisel Center 24.5 23.9 5.8 21 0.150Reduced Till none 24.1 24.1 5.8 22 0.159

Standard till 25.9 23.0 6.0 19.3 0.117Reduced till 24.3 23.9 5.9 22.6 0.159

Probability NS 0.015 0.03 NS 0.0001

Chisel Center 24.2 23.4 6.0 21.8 0.134none 24.6 23.6 5.8 20.7 0.137

Probability NS NS 0.10 NS 0.13Interaction NS NS 0.01 NS NS%CV 11 1 3 37 7

Reduced Fall Tillage Comparison, UC Davis, 2007

Similar yield between tillage systems

Bed chisel – no response in 1st year

Slight reduction in PTAB color, brix, and early plant growth

Page 12: Evaluation of Reduced Fall-Timed, Tillage Operations · Net canopy Treatment Yield % cover Tillage (Tons/A) color Brix sun lumens Standard Till Chisel Center 23.8 22.9 6.2 23 0.117

Reduced Fall Tillage Comparison Effect on Yield (tons/A)

UC Davis, 2008

Page 13: Evaluation of Reduced Fall-Timed, Tillage Operations · Net canopy Treatment Yield % cover Tillage (Tons/A) color Brix sun lumens Standard Till Chisel Center 23.8 22.9 6.2 23 0.117
Page 14: Evaluation of Reduced Fall-Timed, Tillage Operations · Net canopy Treatment Yield % cover Tillage (Tons/A) color Brix sun lumens Standard Till Chisel Center 23.8 22.9 6.2 23 0.117

Comparable fruit yields between standard vs. reduced fall tillage.

Benefit of single chisel in bed center w/ reduced tillage system?

Results: Tillage Trials, UC Davis 2007 & 2008

Page 15: Evaluation of Reduced Fall-Timed, Tillage Operations · Net canopy Treatment Yield % cover Tillage (Tons/A) color Brix sun lumens Standard Till Chisel Center 23.8 22.9 6.2 23 0.117

Continue on UC Davis campus field siteExpand testing into grower fields

Future Plans:

Page 16: Evaluation of Reduced Fall-Timed, Tillage Operations · Net canopy Treatment Yield % cover Tillage (Tons/A) color Brix sun lumens Standard Till Chisel Center 23.8 22.9 6.2 23 0.117

Funding Support: California Tomato Research InstituteField Assistance: Mark Kochi, Yolo County field assistantJim Jackson, Fred Stewart, Franciso Rodriquez & crew,

Plant Sciences Department, UC DavisStudents Sara Pearson (Chico) & Margaret Lloyd (UCD)E & J FarmsSupplies:T S & LAg Seeds Unlimited

Page 17: Evaluation of Reduced Fall-Timed, Tillage Operations · Net canopy Treatment Yield % cover Tillage (Tons/A) color Brix sun lumens Standard Till Chisel Center 23.8 22.9 6.2 23 0.117
Page 18: Evaluation of Reduced Fall-Timed, Tillage Operations · Net canopy Treatment Yield % cover Tillage (Tons/A) color Brix sun lumens Standard Till Chisel Center 23.8 22.9 6.2 23 0.117

Strip-tilling cover crop ahead oftransplanting tomatoes

Sano Farms, Firebaugh, 2006

Page 19: Evaluation of Reduced Fall-Timed, Tillage Operations · Net canopy Treatment Yield % cover Tillage (Tons/A) color Brix sun lumens Standard Till Chisel Center 23.8 22.9 6.2 23 0.117

Strip-till planted processing tomatoesFirebaugh, CA 2006

Page 20: Evaluation of Reduced Fall-Timed, Tillage Operations · Net canopy Treatment Yield % cover Tillage (Tons/A) color Brix sun lumens Standard Till Chisel Center 23.8 22.9 6.2 23 0.117

PROCESSING TOMATOESSTRIP-TILL PLANTED INTOTRITICALE COVER CROP

FIREBAUGH, CA 2005

Page 21: Evaluation of Reduced Fall-Timed, Tillage Operations · Net canopy Treatment Yield % cover Tillage (Tons/A) color Brix sun lumens Standard Till Chisel Center 23.8 22.9 6.2 23 0.117

Tomato Yields 2000-2008

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

65

70

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008Year

stnostccctnoctcc

Tomato Yield (tons/A)UC Westside Research & Extension Center

Conservation Tillage

Standard Tillage

Page 22: Evaluation of Reduced Fall-Timed, Tillage Operations · Net canopy Treatment Yield % cover Tillage (Tons/A) color Brix sun lumens Standard Till Chisel Center 23.8 22.9 6.2 23 0.117

The End