evidentiary hearing day 2, 2011 killing of reynaldo muñoz

Upload: mikem2483

Post on 01-Jun-2018

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    1/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    170

    I N THE CI RCUI T COURT OF THE 11TH J UDI CI AL CI RCUI T I N AND FOR MI AMI - DADE COUNTY, FLORI DA

    GENERAL J URI SDI CTI ON DI VI SI ON

    CASE NO. : 11- 037237 CA 23

    REYNALDO MUNOZ, SR. , as survi vi ng f at herand as Per sonal Repr esent at i ve of t he Est at eof REYNALDO MUNOZ, J R. , and CARI DAD LOPEZ,as survi vi ng mot her ,

    Pl ai nt i f f s,vs.

    J EFFREY DAVI S, i ndi vi dual l y and as parent

    of mi nor chi l d, J ACK DAVI S, and YASMI NEDAVI S, i ndi vi dual l y and as par ent of mi norchi l d, J ACK DAVI S,

    Def endant s.____________________________________________/

    73 West Fl agl er St r eet , Mi ami , Fl or i da, Monday, 1: 30 p. m. , December 29, 2014.

    The hear i ng i n t he above- ent i t l ed cause r esume

    bef or e The Honor abl e St anf or d Bl ake, Ci r cui t Cour t

    J udge, af t er t he l uncheon r ecess.

    APPEARANCES:

    ROBERTS & DURKEE, P. A. , by DAVI D DURKEE, Esqui r e, and

    ALVAREZ RODRI GUEZ, by J UAN L. ALVAREZ, Esqui r e, and J OEL S. PERWI N, P. A. , by J OEL S. PERWI N, Esqui r e, At t or neys f or Pl ai nt i f f s .

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    2/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    171

    1 APPEARANCES CONTI NUED:

    2 LAW OFFI CES OF KUBI CKI , DRAPER, by PETER H. MURPHY, Esqui r e, and

    3 WI LLI AM BI SSETT, Esqui r e, At t or neys f or Def endant s.

    4 THE MCGRANE LAW FI RM, by

    5 MI LES A. MCGRANE, Esqui r e, At t or ney f or J ack Davi s.

    6ALSO PRESENT: Yasmi ne Davi s

    7 J ef f r ey Davi s, Esq. J ack Davi s.

    8

    I NDEX9

    10 WI TNESS CROSS REDI RECT RECROSS

    11 Det ect i ve Nye- Gonzal ez

    12 ( By Mr . Murphy) 216( By Mr . Dur kee) 172 ( Cont i nued) 221

    13

    14 WI TNESS DI RECT CROSS REDI RECT

    15 Dr . J ul i an Munoz- Di az16 ( By Mr . Dur kee) 228

    ( By Mr . Murphy) 23717

    18 WI TNESS DI RECT CROSS REDI RECT

    19 Dr . Ronal d Wr i ght

    20 ( By Mr . Durkee) 242 276( By Mr . Murphy) 255

    21

    WI TNESS DI RECT CROSS REDI RECT22

    Wayne Wi l l i ams23

    ( By Mr . Durkee) 284 29524 ( By Mr . Murphy) 293

    25

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    3/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    172

    1 THE COURT: Thank you ever yone.

    2 MR. DURKEE: May I proceed, Your Honor ?

    3 THE COURT: Yes.

    4 Ther eupon:

    5 DETECTI VE NYE- GONZALEZ

    6 r esumed.

    7 CROSS EXAMI NATI ON CONTI NUED

    8 BY MR. DURKEE:

    9 Q. Good af t er noon, Det ect i ve.

    10 A. Good af t ernoon.

    11 Q. Fi r st of al l , t o go back j ust f or a

    12 moment , I j ust want t o make sur e we ar e cl ear

    13 because we ki nd of got caught up wi t h what t he exact

    14 l anguage was, but at t he t i me t hat you, quot e,

    15 "suspect ed t hat no cr i me has been commi t t ed" maybe

    16 i n t he f i r st hour or t wo of your i nvest i gat i on, t he

    17 onl y evi dence you had was J asmi ne' s st at ement ,

    18 correct?

    19 A. No.

    20 Q. What el se di d you have?

    21 A. Wel l , I t al ked t o t he of f i cer s. I had

    22 been t hr ough t he back of t he resi dence, sever al

    23 t hi ngs had t r anspi r ed.

    24 Q. But what speci f i cal l y wer e you r el yi ng on

    25 t o f or m a concl usi on wi t hi n t he f i r st hour or t wo

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    4/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    173

    1 t hat , quot e, "you suspect ed t hat no cr i me had been

    2 commi t t ed, " ot her t han t he st at ement t hat we tal ked

    3 about because I want t o l i st t hem speci f i cal l y, not

    4 j ust wal ki ng ar ound t he pr emi ses?

    5 When you wal ked ar ound t he pr emi ses, what

    6 evi dence di d you per cei ve or see t hat l ed you t o

    7 t hi s concl usi on t hat you suspect ed t hat no cr i me had

    8 been commi t t ed?

    9 A. Wel l , I was t her e t o conduct a deat h

    10 i nvest i gat i on and t hat ' s what I was doi ng. I spoke

    11 wi t h t he of f i cer who had al r eady spoken t o Ms.

    12 Davi s, t ook t hat i nt o consi der at i on. What I had

    13 was, at t hat poi nt what I t hought was an armed

    14 bur gl ar y and a f ami l y def endi ng themsel ves.

    15 Q. Ri ght . So t he onl y t hi ng you had at t hat

    16 poi nt was J asmi ne' s st at ement , cor r ect ?

    17 A. Wel l , l i ke I sai d, I wal ked t hr ough. I

    18 had been t o t he back. I was absor bi ng al l of t he

    19 i nf or mat i on t hat I was t ol d at t hat t i me. So I

    20 don' t know i f I can l i st t hi ng by t hi ng. I ' m

    21 absor bi ng i nf or mat i on. I am l ooki ng ar ound. I am

    22 hear i ng. I am t al ki ng.

    23 Q. Wel l , ot her t han absor bi ng t hi ngs by

    24 osmosi s, but i f you woul d f or t he Cour t , pl ease l i st

    25 any - - and you can l i st anyt hi ng. I don' t car e i f

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    5/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    174

    1 you l i st t hem al l or one or t wo, but I know we

    2 t al ked about J asmi ne' s st at ement , what el se wer e you

    3 r el yi ng on? Can you t el l t hi s Cour t anyt hi ng el se

    4 speci f i cal l y t hat you wer e r el yi ng on t o come up

    5 wi t h t he concl usi on t hat , quot e, unquot e, "You

    6 suspect ed t hat no cr i me had been commi t t ed"?

    7 A. Then I guess we are goi ng t o have t o go

    8 t hr ough my repor t and I can t el l you t he t hi ngs I

    9 di d and t he st eps t hat I t ook. I ' m not sur e t her e

    10 i s anot her way.

    11 Q. Okay.

    12 A. Okay? So i ni t i al l y I get a phone cal l , or

    13 I am t ol d by anot her det ect i ve who r ecei ved a phone

    14 cal l what we wer e r espondi ng t o. So I absor bed

    15 t hat . I don' t t hi nk i t was by osmosi s, but I

    16 absor bed t hat .

    17 Q. What about t hat f i r st conver sat i on or

    18 f i r st i nf or mat i on t hat you der i ved f r om t hat t hat

    19 you r el i ed on t o come up wi t h a concl usi on t hat ,

    20 quot e, unquot e, "You suspect ed t hat no cr i me had

    21 been commi t t ed"?

    22 A. Wel l , I was t ol d t hat a mal e was st eal i ng

    23 a wave runner f r om t he resi dence and was shot by t he

    24 homeowner . Lat er - -

    25 Q. So t hat st at ement t her e t hat i s somet hi ng

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    6/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    175

    1 you r el i ed on?

    2 A. Wel l , of cour se, Mr . Dur kee.

    3 Q. Okay. That ' s one st at ement .

    4 A. Ever yt hi ng t hat I di d, al l t he t hi ngs t hat

    5 I hear d, ever yone t hat I t al ked t o, anyt hi ng t hat I

    6 saw, I r el i ed upon.

    7 Q. Of cour se.

    8 A. And I st i l l r el y upon t oday.

    9 Q. Of cour se. And t hat ' s what I ' m t r yi ng t o

    10 f i gur e out . You sai d wi t hi n t he f i r st - -

    11 A. No, I di dn' t say wi t hi n t he f i r st

    12 anyt hi ng. You ar e t he one t hat sai d wi t hi n t he

    13 f i r st . Now you gi ve a t i me sl ot . When I ar r i ved, I

    14 was conduct i ng a deat h i nvest i gat i on. That ' s what I

    15 was doi ng.

    16 Q. Ma' am, I am not t r yi ng t o bi cker wi t h you.

    17 What I am t r yi ng t o say i s you t ol d me - - I t hi nk

    18 t hat i s how i t pl ayed out . I sai d t hat when he l ef t

    19 t he pr emi ses, J ack l ef t t he pr emi ses wi t h hi s

    20 f at her , whi ch I t hi nk we' ve est abl i shed was wi t hi n

    21 t he f i r st hour or so of t he i nvest i gat i on, you t ol d

    22 t hi s Cour t t hat at t hat t i me when he l ef t t he

    23 pr emi ses, you di dn' t t hi nk i t was t hat bi g of a deal

    24 because he was a wi t ness at t hat poi nt , he wasn' t a

    25 suspect .

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    7/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    176

    1 A. Wel l , l et ' s st op r i ght t her e because I

    2 di dn' t know t hat he l ef t unt i l af t er he l ef t and

    3 came back. So I di dn' t know t hat . So I di dn' t make

    4 any det er mi nat i ons at t hat t i me.

    5 Q. I ' m not t r yi ng t o put wor ds i n your mout h.

    6 We can go back t o t he t r anscr i pt because I marked

    7 i t . You were t he one who vol unt eered t o me. I

    8 di dn' t cr eat e t hi s . I di dn' t tal k about thi s . I

    9 sai d, "When he l ef t t he scene, he was a wi t ness t o a

    10 cr i me, " and you sai d t o us, "No, I don' t t hi nk he

    11 was a wi t ness or a suspect or anyt hi ng el se because

    12 at t hat t i me I di dn' t suspect t hat any cr i me had

    13 been commi t t ed. "

    14 That i s what you sai d. So what I am

    15 t r yi ng t o f i nd out i s when he l ef t t he cr i me scene

    16 wi t h hi s f at her , unaccompani ed by any pol i ce

    17 of f i cer s, and you had f or med t hat bel i ef i n your

    18 head, not me, t hat you had suspect ed t hat no cr i me

    19 had been commi t t ed, what I am t r yi ng t o f i gur e out

    20 i s what ar e t he pi eces of evi dence t hat you wer e

    21 r el yi ng on t o f or m t hat concl usi on so ear l y i n t he

    22 case?

    23 I mean, you under st and how an

    24 i nvest i gat i on goes. You go out and you gat her

    25 evi dence. You gat her al l of t he evi dence and t hen

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    8/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    177

    1 f or m concl usi ons. You have done t hat i n f r ont of

    2 t he Cour t and you have done t hat t oday.

    3 You were t he one t hat t ol d us t hat when he

    4 l ef t t he pr emi ses, t hat he was a wi t ness or a

    5 suspect because you had sai d, quot e, unquot e, "You

    6 suspect ed t hat no cr i me had been commi t t ed. "

    7 So now I ' m t r yi ng t o f i nd out , at t hat

    8 t i me you made t hat concl usi on, what evi dence - - and

    9 you under st and evi dence, r i ght ?

    10 A. Excuse me?

    11 Q. Do you under st and evi dence?

    12 A. Do I underst and evi dence?

    13 Q. Do you under st and t hat you' r e supposed t o

    14 gat her evi dence dur i ng an i nvest i gat i on?

    15 A. I bel i eve I do, Mr . Dur kee.

    16 Q. So I t hi nk i t ' s a si mpl e quest i on. When

    17 you made t hat concl usi on t hat you had suspect ed t hat

    18 no cr i me had been commi t t ed, what evi dence wer e you

    19 r el yi ng on t o make t hat concl usi on?

    20 A. What I was r el yi ng on was t he i nf or mat i on

    21 I had r ecei ved f r om t he ot her of f i cer s, f r om t he

    22 ot her - - al l t he ot her of f i cer s on t he scene, f r om

    23 t he st at ement t hat was gi ven t o t he ot her of f i cer

    24 whi ch was t hen t r ansl at ed t o me, what I saw when I

    25 wal ked ar ound t he pr emi ses. That ' s what I was

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    9/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    178

    1 r el yi ng on.

    2 Q. Let ' s t ake each one of t hose t hi ngs. The

    3 st at ement s t hat had been pr ovi ded t o you up unt i l

    4 t hat poi nt by t he ot her of f i cer s r eal l y was t hat

    5 J asmi ne had gi ven a st at ement and t hat was

    6 communi cat ed t o you, cor r ect ?

    7 A. That ' s one of t he t hi ngs, Yes.

    8 Q. You had not r evi ewed t he 911 t ape at t hat

    9 poi nt , cor r ect ?

    10 A. I don' t know what poi nt I r evi ewed i t . I

    11 can l ook at my not es and see, but I di d r evi ew t he

    12 911 t ape.

    13 Q. Ri ght , t hat was l at er on.

    14 A. Do you want me t o l ook at t hat ?

    15 Q. That was l at er on. That was at 5: 55 p. m.

    16 I t ' s on Page 6.

    17 But somet i me bef or e t hat i s when t he f ol ks

    18 came back and you conf r ont ed Mr . Davi s about t he

    19 f act t hat you guys had suspect ed t hat hi s son was

    20 t he shoot er . That ' s on Page 4.

    21 A. Okay.

    22 Q. So i f you l ook at i t chr onol ogi cal l y, you

    23 di dn' t r evi ew t he 911 t ape at t hat poi nt . What I am

    24 sayi ng i s, ot her t han t al ki ng t o Of f i cer - - because

    25 you di d wr i t e t hi s chr onol ogi cal l y. I mean, i t

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    10/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    179

    1 seems l i ke chr onol ogi cal l y by t he t i me you

    2 conf r ont ed J ef f r ey Davi s and hi s son, t hat you

    3 suspect ed t hat hi s son had been t he shoot er . The

    4 onl y t hi ng t hat you r eal l y had done i s t al k t o

    5 Of f i cer Zabi el i nsky and t aken t he cal l back at t he

    6 of f i ce t hat t here was a r obbery and somebody got

    7 shot ?

    8 A. Wel l , Mr . Dur kee, i f you want t o r ead on

    9 Page 4, i t says Ser geant Mal ot t i s t he one t hat

    10 advi sed Mr . Davi s t hat t her e was a suspi ci on t hat

    11 J ack was t he one who shot t he f i r ear m. I di dn' t

    12 advi se hi m.

    13 Q. Yes, but he had al r eady gone of f t he

    14 pr emi ses at t hat poi nt , cor r ect ?

    15 A. I bel i eve so.

    16 Q. Ri ght .

    17 A. I t was acci dent al l y omi t t ed f r om my

    18 r epor t . I don' t see i t her e. So I don' t know t he

    19 t i me and Sergeant Mal ot t woul d have t o answer t o t he

    20 t i mes.

    21 Q. Ri ght , because i t ' s not ment i oned anywher e

    22 i n your i nvest i gat i ve r epor t t hat you al l owed t he

    23 shoot er t o go of f t he pr emi ses wi t h hi s f at her , a

    24 l awyer , and get consul t ed and came back t o t he

    25 pr emi ses. That ' s nowher e i n your r epor t , r i ght ?

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    11/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    180

    1 A. I t i s not i n my r epor t , but J ack and hi s

    2 f at her l ef t t he scene. I t ' s not i n my r epor t . That

    3 i s cor r ect . I t was acci dent al l y omi t t ed. I di dn' t

    4 al l ow anyone t o do t hat .

    5 Q. So I am cor r ect t o say at t hat poi nt t her e

    6 was no physi cal evi dence t hat you gat hered t hat you

    7 r el i ed on, cor r ect ?

    8 A. Mr . Dur kee, I ' m havi ng a di f f i cul t t i me

    9 under st andi ng what i t i s t hat you' r e t r yi ng t o get

    10 f r om me. I t ol d you t hat I was di spat ched t her e. I

    11 went t her e. I am conduct i ng a deat h i nvest i gat i on.

    12 I di dn' t - - I di dn' t al l ow J ack t o l eave. I can' t

    13 answer t o t hat .

    14 Q. Ri ght , but you wer e t he l ead i nvest i gat or ,

    15 correct?

    16 A. Under my super vi sor , Ser geant Mal ot t , t hat

    17 i s cor r ect .

    18 Q. And ver y ear l y i n t he case, ver y ear l y i n

    19 t he case you as t he l ead i nvest i gat or had come t o

    20 t he concl usi on t hat you t ol d us her e i n Cour t t hat

    21 you, quot e, unquot e, "suspect ed t hat no cr i me had

    22 been commi t t ed"?

    23 A. That ' s cor r ect .

    24 Q. What I am t r yi ng t o f i nd out , and I t hi nk

    25 i t ' s a l egi t i mat e i nqui r y, i s ot her t han t he

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    12/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    181

    1 st at ement by J asmi ne Davi s t o Of f i cer Zabi el i nsky,

    2 what ot her obj ect i ve evi dence wer e you r el yi ng on t o

    3 make t hat concl usi on? Ot her t han wal ki ng around t he

    4 scene and seei ng a body t hat ' s on t he gr ound, ot her

    5 t han wal ki ng around t he scene and seei ng a wave

    6 r unner , ot her t han wal ki ng ar ound t he scene and

    7 seei ng a shot gun on t he t abl e, ot her t han wal ki ng

    8 ar ound t he scene seei ng J asmi ne si t t i ng out i n t he

    9 backyar d, ot her t han wal ki ng t he scene and seei ng

    10 pol i ce t ape, ot her t han wal ki ng ar ound and seei ng

    11 ot her pol i ce of f i cer s wal ki ng ar ound, i n your mi nd

    12 what were t he i t ems of evi dence t hat you were

    13 r el yi ng on t o come up wi t h t he concl usi on t hat you

    14 suspect ed t hat no cr i me had been commi t t ed ear l y on

    15 i n t hi s i nvesti gat i on?

    16 A. As I ' ve t ol d you bef or e, al l of t he

    17 i nf or mat i on t hat I had up unt i l t hat poi nt .

    18 Q. Wher e shoul d I cut t hat cut of f on your

    19 r epor t ? When you say, "up t o t hat poi nt , " wher e do

    20 I f i nd t hat ?

    21 A. I don' t know. You' r e t he one who i s

    22 det er mi ni ng t her e i s a poi nt . I ' m not sur e. You' r e

    23 det er mi ni ng t her e i s a poi nt . You sai d t her e was an

    24 hour or t wo hour s. I ' m not r eal l y sur e. I ' m not

    25 r eal l y sur e what you' r e - - t hat t her e was a t i me

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    13/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    182

    1 mar ker . I r esponded t o t hi s scene t o conduct a

    2 deat h i nvest i gat i on and t hat ' s what I di d.

    3 Q. You ar e supposed t o f ol l ow t he evi dence,

    4 r i ght ?

    5 A. I conduct ed a deat h i nvest i gat i on.

    6 Q. Wai t a mi nut e. I ' m aski ng you a quest i on.

    7 A. Of cour se we f ol l ow t he evi dence.

    8 Q. Now, you t ol d me t hat J ef f r ey Davi s and

    9 hi s son had gone of f t he pr emi ses and t hen when t hey

    10 came back, t hat ' s when you or , bet t er , Ser geant

    11 Mal ot t had conf r ont ed J ef f r ey and J ack wi t h t he

    12 i nf or mat i on t hat you suspect ed J ack was t he shoot er ,

    13 cor r ect ? We' ve est abl i shed t hat , r i ght ?

    14 A. That we suspect ed, yes, t hat i s cor r ect .

    15 Q. So I t hi nk we now have a t i me st amp. We

    16 know t hat when you conf r ont ed J ef f r ey and J ack wi t h

    17 your suspi ci ons, t hey had al r eady been of f t he

    18 pr emi ses, cor r ect ?

    19 A. I bel i eve so, yes.

    20 Q. And I t hi nk on your r epor t we have t hat at

    21 about - - somet i me bet ween 4: 45 and 4: 50 when t he

    22 medi a r el at i ons peopl e showed up, r i ght ? Accor di ng

    23 t o your chr onol ogy i n your r epor t , cor r ect ?

    24 A. That i s cor r ect .

    25 Q. So you ar r i ved on t he scene at 4: 00,

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    14/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    183

    1 correct?

    2 A. That i s cor r ect .

    3 Q. And af t er you ar r i ve on t he scene - - f i r st

    4 of al l , you had got t en a cal l t o advi se you what was

    5 goi ng on and t o go t o t he scene. That was somet hi ng

    6 t hat happened wi t h you. And t hen you t al ked t o

    7 Of f i cer Zabi el i nsky and he t ol d you what J asmi ne had

    8 t ol d hi m. Ther e was f i r e r escue on t he scene. You

    9 not ed t hat . You had gone and conduct ed a

    10 wal k- t hr ough of t he r ear of t he r esi dence. You

    11 i nt r oduce your sel f t o J asmi ne.

    12 And t hen event ual l y, af t er 4: 45 but bef or e

    13 4: 50, you guys conf r ont ed Mr . Davi s and J ack t hat

    14 you f el t t hat he had been t he shoot er . I s t hat

    15 r i ght ?

    16 A. That ' s r i ght .

    17 Q. So t hat was t he ext ent of your

    18 i nvest i gat i on up t o t hat poi nt , r i ght ?

    19 A. Up t o t hat poi nt , yes.

    20 Q. Now, once Mr . Davi s was conf r ont ed wi t h

    21 t hi s i nf or mat i on, he t ol d you t hat f r om t hat poi nt

    22 f or war d, hi s cr i mi nal l awyer , Ms. Rat zan, woul d

    23 speak f or t he f ami l y, cor r ect ?

    24 A. He di dn' t t el l me. He t ol d Ser geant

    25 Mal ot t t hat Ms. Rat zan wi l l be r epr esent i ng and

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    15/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    184

    1 speaki ng on t hei r behal f .

    2 Q. I n your ver nacul ar , t hat ' s basi cal l y

    3 cal l ed l awyer i ng i t up, r i ght ?

    4 A. I guess you coul d say t hat .

    5 Q. Have you hear d t hat t er m bef or e?

    6 A. I have.

    7 Q. And t hat ' s when a cr i mi nal def endant says,

    8 "I ' m not t al ki ng t o you any f ur t her . I want t o t al k

    9 t o my l awyer , " r i ght ? That ' s what i t means by

    10 l awyer i ng i t up, r i ght ?

    11 A. I guess you coul d gi ve i t t hat connot at i on

    12 or you coul d j ust say, " I have a l awyer who i s goi ng

    13 t o be r epr esent i ng me. " Peopl e get l awyer s al l t he

    14 t i me.

    15 Q. Af t er Mr . Davi s, who i s a l awyer , t ol d you

    16 t hat , you knew you coul d not i nt er vi ew J asmi ne or

    17 J ack unt i l t he l awyer got t here and you had t o t al k

    18 t hr ough t he l awyer . I s t hat r i ght ?

    19 A. That i s cor r ect . She was goi ng t o be

    20 maki ng a st at ement .

    21 Q. Now, at t hat poi nt you had Ms. Davi s' s

    22 st at ement t hat she f i r ed a weapon, and you had

    23 r easonabl e suspi ci on t o bel i eve based on t he wound

    24 t o J ack' s f ace, and maybe some ot her col l at er al

    25 evi dence, t hat J ack was i n f act t he shoot er . So you

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    16/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    185

    1 had t wo possi bl e scenar i os. You had t he f act t hat

    2 J asmi ne may have shot , Mr s. Davi s, or you had t hi s

    3 mi nor chi l d, J ack, who coul d have f i r ed t he weapon.

    4 You had t wo conf l i ct i ng ver si ons at t hat poi nt . You

    5 suspect ed J ack, but you al so had t hi s ver bal

    6 st at ement t hat J asmi ne had f i r ed t he weapon.

    7 So at t hat poi nt t her e ar e t est s t o

    8 det er mi ne def i ni t el y i f somebody shot a weapon. I s

    9 that true?

    10 A. Not def i ni t el y, but t her e ar e gunshot

    11 r esi due t est s t hat can be admi ni st er ed, yes.

    12 Q. And t hat ' s somet hi ng t hat ' s r egul ar cour se

    13 of busi ness, i f you want t o det er mi ne - - t hat i s t he

    14 t est t hat you t r y and admi ni st er t o t r y t o det er mi ne

    15 who shot t he weapon, cor r ect ?

    16 A. That i s one of t he t est s, yes.

    17 Q. And you never di d t hat i n t hi s case,

    18 r i ght ?

    19 A. A gunshot r esi due t est was not conduct ed,

    20 no.

    21 Q. And as t he l ead det ect i ve, i f you want ed

    22 t o f i ght f or a gun r esi due t est , you coul d have

    23 f ought f or t hat , cor r ect ?

    24 A. Wel l , I had an Assi st ant St at e At t or ney

    25 t here and we di scussed i t and we deci ded t hat i t was

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    17/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    186

    1 not goi ng t o happen.

    2 Q. Di d you f eel t hat was t he appr opr i at e

    3 t hi ng t o do, not t o do a gunshot r esi due t est ? Was

    4 t hat your deci si on or di d you j ust def er t o t he

    5 St at e At t or ney?

    6 A. I t hi nk i t was mor e of a gr oup deci si on

    7 and t he Davi s f ami l y decl i ned and we accept ed t hat

    8 we ar en' t goi ng t o do gunshot r esi due.

    9 Q. I t wasn' t t hat you t ot al l y di d not

    10 consi der i t , t he f ami l y actual l y r ef used t o do i t ?

    11 A. They decl i ned, yes.

    12 Q. Who decl i ned t hat on behal f of t he f ami l y,

    13 wasn' t t hat J ef f Davi s?

    14 A. I wi l l have t o l ook at my not es.

    15 Q. Anyway, t hey r ef used, cor r ect ?

    16 A. Yes.

    17 Q. Now, al so you were operat i ng under t he

    18 bel i ef based on t hi s st at ement t hat you had der i ved

    19 f r om Of f i cer Zabi el i nsky t hat J asmi ne Davi s had

    20 pr of f er ed t o hi m t hat t her e was a gun i nvol ved,

    21 correct?

    22 A. I ' m sor r y, you wi l l have t o say t hat

    23 agai n.

    24 Q. Based on t he st at ement t hat you had

    25 gat her ed f r om Of f i cer Zabi el i nsky t hat came f r om

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    18/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    187

    1 J asmi ne Davi s, you bel i eved t hat t he person t hat was

    2 t her e t r yi ng t o st eal t he wave runner possi bl y had a

    3 gun. I s t hat t r ue?

    4 A. Yes.

    5 Q. And, i n f act , you r equest ed pol i ce di ver s

    6 t o t he scene, I t hi nk i t was about 4: 55, about an

    7 hour af t er you got t her e t o st ar t l ooki ng f or a gun,

    8 correct?

    9 A. That i s cor r ect . They wer e cal l ed.

    10 Q. And t he r eason you' r e l ooki ng f or a gun

    11 t hat Mr . Reynal do Munoz, J r . may or may not have had

    12 i s t hat woul d have been a ver y i mpor t ant pi ece of

    13 evi dence. I f t he f ami l y i s sayi ng I shot t hi s

    14 f el l ow because he had a gun, you obvi ousl y want ed t o

    15 t r y and f i nd t hat gun t o see whet her you coul d

    16 suppor t t hei r st or y or not , cor r ect ?

    17 A. Yes, we want ed t o f i nd i t i f we coul d f i nd

    18 i t , yeah.

    19 Q. You never f ound i t , di d you?

    20 A. No, we di d not f i nd a gun.

    21 Q. I n f act , when t he st at ement was pr of f er ed

    22 t hr ough t he at t or ney, t her e was no pr of f er t hat t he

    23 gun may be i nsi de of t he f r ont compar t ment . I s t hat

    24 true?

    25 A. I woul d have t o l ook back at t he

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    19/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    188

    1 st at ement . I ' m not sur e. I can l ook at i t , t hough.

    2 No, t hat i s not i n t he i ni t i al st at ement

    3 f r om At t or ney Rat zan.

    4 Q. So at t hat poi nt , nobody r eal l y t ol d you

    5 t o l ook i n t he f r ont compar t ment f or a gun, cor r ect ?

    6 A. At t hat poi nt , no.

    7 Q. At t hi s poi nt , based on your anal ysi s of

    8 t he evi dence and wi t h your exper i ence, you woul d

    9 agr ee wi t h me t hat mor e l i kel y t han not he never had

    10 a gun and i t was r eal l y, i f anyt hi ng, t hi s r ecei ver

    11 devi ce t hat she may have per cei ved t o be a gun. I s

    12 t hat r i ght ?

    13 A. I bel i eve t hat now, yes.

    14 Q. Now t hat we ar e on t he pr of f er , t he

    15 pr of f er t hat was made and t hat was supposedl y comi ng

    16 f r om J asmi ne Davi s was t he f ol l owi ng, t hat she was

    17 i nsi de of t he r esi dence wi t h her chi l dr en. She

    18 obser ved a man near a st orage cl oset i n t he r ear of

    19 her r esi dence. She approached t he man and began

    20 yel l i ng as she cal l ed 911. I s t hat r i ght ?

    21 A. That ' s cor r ect so f ar .

    22 Q. At t hat t i me, she t ol d J ack, her son, t o

    23 get t he gun whi ch i s kept under t he mast er bed,

    24 r i ght ? So f ar so good?

    25 A. So f ar so good. You' r e r eadi ng i t .

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    20/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    189

    1 Q. J asmi ne t hen t ol d t he man t hat she had a

    2 gun and i n response t he man sai d he had a gun, t oo.

    3 When J ack came out si de wi t h t he gun, he

    4 shot t he man. J asmi ne admi t t ed t hat she or i gi nal l y

    5 l i ed about i t and at t hi s t i me - - I ' m not r eadi ng i t

    6 pr eci sel y, but event ual l y she al so t ol d you at t hi s

    7 t i me t her e was possi bl y anot her - - a second man on a

    8 wave r unner ci r cl i ng t he ar ea, cor r ect ?

    9 A. You' r e r eadi ng i t . You' r e l eavi ng out

    10 some par t s but , yeah, you' r e r eadi ng i t . That ' s

    11 exact l y what i t says.

    12 Q. I n t hat pr of f er she never t ol d t he pol i ce

    13 t hat she t hought t he man was dr oppi ng of f a boat ,

    14 correct?

    15 A. You j ust r ead i t . Nope, i t doesn' t say

    16 anyt hi ng about t hat .

    17 Q. And you agr ee wi t h me t hat , i f anyt hi ng,

    18 her f ear der i ved f r om t he f act t hat t he guy sai d he

    19 had a gun, t oo, cor r ect ?

    20 A. No, I woul dn' t agr ee wi t h you on t hat .

    21 Q. I n t hat pr of f er does she ever say she saw

    22 a gun?

    23 A. I don' t bel i eve i t says t hat , no.

    24 Q. And we t al ked about i t , she never st at ed

    25 i n t hat pr of f er t hat t he per cei ved gun was i nsi de of

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    21/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    190

    1 t he f r ont compar t ment , cor r ect ? We al r eady t al ked

    2 about t hat .

    3 A. Agai n, Mr . Dur kee, you r ead i t and i t

    4 di dn' t say anyt hi ng about t hat .

    5 Q. Ma' am, I am not t r yi ng t o aggr avat e you.

    6 You sound l i ke you' r e get t i ng aggr avat ed. I am j ust

    7 t r yi ng t o do my j ob j ust l i ke you' r e t r yi ng t o do

    8 your j ob, okay?

    9 A. I ' m j ust r ef er r i ng back t o t he f act t hat

    10 you r ead i t and - -

    11 Q. You don' t need t o be smar t wi t h me. I am

    12 j ust t r yi ng t o do my j ob, okay?

    13 A. Okay. So am I .

    14 Q. Exact l y.

    15 At t hat t i me, At t or ney Rat zan al so advi sed

    16 you t hat t he f ami l y was not goi ng t o cooper at e any

    17 f ur t her because, A, t hey wer e t o di st r aught t o be

    18 i nt er vi ewed and, B, t hey needed t o st udy f or f i nal s,

    19 r i ght ?

    20 A. She sai d t hat t he f ami l y i s t o di st r aught

    21 t o be i nt er vi ewed at t hat t i me and t he chi l dr en wer e

    22 pr epar i ng f or t hei r f i nal s, t hus we agr eed t o meet

    23 at a l at er dat e.

    24 Q. And, i n f act , t he f ami l y and At t or ney

    25 Rat zan had agr eed t o meet wi t h you t he f ol l owi ng

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    22/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    191

    1 Monday, whi ch woul d have been t wo days af t er t he

    2 shoot i ng, t o come down and gi ve t hei r st at ement s,

    3 correct?

    4 A. That was t he dat e on t he 23r d, yes.

    5 Q. That was t he pl an, r i ght ?

    6 A. Yes, t hat was t he pl an.

    7 Q. But t hat pl an di dn' t get ef f ect uat ed

    8 because t hey never showed up, r i ght ?

    9 A. I t was cancel ed. I bel i eve t hey spoke

    10 wi t h Ser geant Mal ot t and i t was cancel ed.

    11 Q. I n f act , you never t ook Mr s. Davi s' s

    12 st at ement unt i l mont hs l at er . I s t hat cor r ect ?

    13 A. That ' s cor r ect .

    14 Q. And you di dn' t t ake J ack Davi s' s st at ement

    15 unt i l November , whi ch was si x mont hs af t er t he

    16 i nci dent , cor r ect ?

    17 A. That ' s cor r ect .

    18 Q. And one of t he r easons you di dn' t - - I

    19 t hi nk you sai d on di r ect , one of t he reasons you

    20 di dn' t push t o have J ack gi ve a st at ement was

    21 because t he ki ds had f i nal s and you had t o make

    22 accommodat i ons, r i ght ?

    23 A. I don' t r ecal l sayi ng t hat .

    24 Q. Do you r emember back i n your deposi t i on

    25 you sai d t he t wo ki ds had f i nal s and t he f ami l y was

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    23/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    192

    1 di st r aught or somet hi ng l i ke t hat ?

    2 A. Okay, yes. That ' s what i t says her e.

    3 That ' s why we di dn' t i nt er vi ew t hem t hat day.

    4 Q. So you were del ayi ng your homi ci de

    5 i nvest i gat i on t o t ake t he st at ement of t he per son

    6 who f i r ed t he weapon because t hese ki ds had t o t ake

    7 some t est s?

    8 A. I wasn' t del ayi ng a deat h i nvest i gat i on.

    9 I t di dn' t del ay t he i nvest i gat i on. I nvest i gat i ons

    10 t ake a ver y l ong t i me. Thi s happens al l of t he

    11 t i me. Thi ngs don' t happen day af t er day af t er day.

    12 Somet i mes t her e i s a del ay. I t ' s a deat h

    13 i nvest i gat i on.

    14 Q. On a homi ci de i nvest i gat i on f or a per son

    15 who l i ves her e i n Mi ami , i s not out of t own, who i s

    16 avai l abl e 24/ 7, i t ' s t ypi cal t o wai t si x mont hs t o

    17 go and t r y t o i nt er vi ew t he al l eged shoot er ?

    18 A. I t ' s t ypi cal t hat somet i mes t hat happens

    19 t hat we don' t i nt er vi ew t hem r i ght away, yes.

    20 Q. What was t he compel l i ng necessi t y other

    21 t han school t est s t o wai t si x mont hs bef or e you

    22 t r i ed t o t ake hi s st at ement ?

    23 A. That ' s when i t wor ked out , Mr . Dur kee. We

    24 spoke. Ther e wer e ot her dat es. The f i r st dat e was

    25 cancel ed. I ' m not sur e i f we t r i ed t o r eschedul e.

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    24/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    193

    1 I was speaki ng wi t h the at t or neys and t hose wer e t he

    2 dat es we ended up wi t h. I had sever al ot her cases.

    3 Ot her t hi ngs were happeni ng.

    4 Q. Now, anot her t hi ng you coul d have done at

    5 t he t i me of t he - - t he day of t he i nvest i gat i on, t he

    6 day of t he shoot i ng, was t o t ake possessi on of t he

    7 wave r unner whi ch was r eal l y par t of t hi s whol e

    8 scenar i o, cor r ect ?

    9 A. We coul d have done t hat , yes.

    10 Q. You coul d have i mpounded i t , r i ght ?

    11 A. We coul d have, yes.

    12 Q. And you di dn' t do t hat ?

    13 A. No, we deci ded not t o.

    14 Q. And t hat ' s because you di dn' t f eel l i ke i t

    15 had any evi dent i ar y val ue at t hat poi nt , cor r ect ? I

    16 mean, evi dence i s kept i n a ver y st r i ct chai n of

    17 cust ody, et cet er a, et cet er a. At t hat poi nt you

    18 must have di scount ed t he wave r unner as havi ng any

    19 evi dent i ar y val ue, cor r ect ?

    20 A. No, we phot ogr aphed i t and pr ocessed i t t o

    21 t he best of our abi l i t y and al l of t he per t i nent

    22 t hi ngs t hat we t hought we needed f r om i t and we

    23 deci ded not t o i mpound i t .

    24 Q. Now, event ual l y sever al weeks l at er , t hey

    25 f ound t hi s bl ack devi ce i nsi de t he gut s of t he wave

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    25/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    194

    1 r unner , r i ght ?

    2 A. That ' s cor r ect .

    3 Q. And t hey f ound t hat t he f r ont compar t ment

    4 door had been br oken down or r i pped of f . I t hi nk

    5 t hat was t he phr ase t hey used, r i pped of f .

    6 A. I ' m not sur e about t he phr ase. I t had

    7 been t amper ed wi t h.

    8 Q. And once t hat was brought t o your

    9 at t ent i on by Mr . Davi s, you went t o hi s of f i ce and

    10 secur ed t he bl ack devi ce f i r st , r i ght ?

    11 A. I woul d have t o l ook at my chai n of

    12 event s, but i f t hat ' s what you say, I went t her e

    13 f i r st , okay. I know I r et r i eved t he box f r om hi m

    14 and t hen subsequent l y I i nt er vi ewed t he gent l eman

    15 who f ound i t at t he J et Ski shop.

    16 Q. And t hen you went t o t he J et Ski shop and

    17 you t ook a ser i es of phot ogr aphs wi t h t he f r ont

    18 compar t ment open and you document ed t he f act t hat

    19 t he back panel had been r i pped of f and you

    20 document ed t hese devi ces wi t h t hei r f emal e and mal e

    21 r ecept acl es of how i t wor ked. I s t hat r i ght ?

    22 A. The cr i me scene det ect i ve i s t he one who

    23 t akes pi ct ur es and wr i t es t he r epor t s on t hat , but I

    24 was t her e and I observed i t .

    25 Q. Ri ght , t hat was somet hi ng t hat was par t of

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    26/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    195

    1 your i nvest i gat i on as t he l ead det ect i ve?

    2 A. Ri ght , I obser ved t hat .

    3 Q. And t hat was t he f i r st t i me any of t hat

    4 had been document ed as f ar as bl ack boxes, t he

    5 r ecept or s i nsi de t he wave r unner , t he panel bei ng

    6 br oken of f , and ever yt hi ng el se, cor r ect ?

    7 A. I don' t t hi nk i t was obvi ous t hat t he

    8 panel had been br oken when we f i r st t ook

    9 phot ogr aphs, but at t hat poi nt , yes, i t was obvi ous,

    10 you know, we saw t he bl ack box and t hat t he panel

    11 had been t ampered wi t h.

    12 Q. You t hought t hat was i mpor t ant t o document

    13 t hat , r i ght , because t hat ' s why you went out t o t he

    14 wave runner shop and phot ogr aphed i t wi t h cr i me

    15 scene i nvest i gat or s, r i ght ?

    16 A. Yes.

    17 Q. Now, pr i or t o t he bl ack box bei ng f ound

    18 and, you know, i t ' s chr onol ogi cal i n your r epor t ,

    19 you conduct ed a canvas of t he ar ea, i s t hat r i ght ,

    20 of t he home wher e t he shoot i ng occur r ed, r i ght ?

    21 A. Can you t el l me whi ch page we ar e on?

    22 Q. I t i s on Page 18.

    23 A. So you' r e r ef er r i ng t o May 24t h?

    24 Q. That i s cor r ect .

    25 A. The area canvas, yes.

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    27/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    196

    1 Q. And t hen i f you l ook at t he second page on

    2 t hat same day, at appr oxi mat el y 11: 00 a. m. , you made

    3 cont act wi t h Mr . Davi s i n f r ont of hi s r esi dence,

    4 correct?

    5 A. That ' s cor r ect .

    6 Q. And he br ought you i nt o hi s backyard and

    7 showed you t hat t here was a l anyar d at t ached t o hi s

    8 wave r unner t hat was not hi s, r i ght ?

    9 A. That ' s cor r ect .

    10 Q. That l anyar d had not been r et r i eved by you

    11 or your i nvest i gat i ve t eam on t he day of t he

    12 shoot i ng, cor r ect ?

    13 A. That ' s cor r ect .

    14 Q. And t hat was a f or ei gn l anyar d and

    15 Mr . Davi s act ual l y t ook you ar ound t he back of t he

    16 house and made sure you preser ved i t as evi dence,

    17 r i ght ?

    18 A. Ri ght , but we di dn' t know i t was f or ei gn

    19 unt i l t hen. We di dn' t know i t was f or ei gn at t hat

    20 t i me.

    21 Q. Ri ght , Mr . Davi s was t he one t hat br ought

    22 t hat t o your at t ent i on on t hi s dat e a f ew days l at er

    23 on May 24t h, r i ght ?

    24 A. That i s cor r ect .

    25 Q. Now, at t hat t i me, di d Mr . Davi s ever t el l

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    28/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    197

    1 you t hat t he f r ont compar t ment may l i kel y be a pl ace

    2 wher e t he f i r ear m was or t he gun?

    3 A. I don' t t hi nk he t ol d me t hat at t hat

    4 t i me.

    5 Q. And t hen subsequent t o t hat i s when you

    6 went t o Mr . Davi s' s of f i ce. I bel i eve i t was on

    7 J une 2nd. I f you go t o Page 21, i t st ar t s J une 2nd,

    8 and cont i nues t o t he next page al l t he way down t o

    9 4: 00 p. m. on t hat dat e. That ' s when he pr ovi ded t o

    10 you t hi s bl ack box and t hen event ual l y you f ol l owed

    11 up wi t h Wayne Wi l l i ams, cor r ect ?

    12 A. That ' s cor r ect .

    13 Q. At t hat t i me when he gave you t he bl ack

    14 box, di d he t el l you t hat i t was l i kel y t hat may

    15 have been what was suspect ed t o be t he gun?

    16 A. No.

    17 Q. Now, on J ul y 22, 2011 i s when you were

    18 f i nal l y abl e t o i nt er vi ew J asmi ne Davi s, cor r ect ?

    19 A. J ul y 22nd. I t sounds r i ght . I woul d have

    20 t o l ook t hr ough and ver i f y t he dat e, but - -

    21 THE COURT: What was t he year ?

    22 MR. DURKEE: 2011. J ul y 22, 2011.

    23 A. J ul y 22nd, yes, 2011.

    24 Q. And you woul d agr ee wi t h me t hat

    25 chr onol ogi cal l y t hat was af t er t he bl ack box had

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    29/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    198

    1 been di scover ed i n t he f r ont compar t ment by

    2 Mr . Davi s, cor r ect ?

    3 A. Yes. That occur r ed af t er , yes.

    4 Q. And i t was al so af t er i t was di scover ed

    5 t hat Reynal do was deaf and had a pr of oundl y hard

    6 t i me maki ng noi se, cor r ect ?

    7 A. I ' m sor r y, say t hat agai n.

    8 Q. That was al so af t er i t was common

    9 knowl edge, newspapers, et cet era, t hat Reynal do was

    10 deaf and mut e, cor r ect ?

    11 A. I knew t hat . I don' t know i f i t was i n

    12 t he newspaper s or common knowl edge, but I knew t hat

    13 he was - - he was deaf but he coul d make noi ses and

    14 sounds and wor ds.

    15 Q. Thi s was t he f i r st t i me t hat anybody had

    16 t ol d you t hat t her e was somet hi ng t hat l ooked l i ke a

    17 gun t hat had been pl aced i n t he f r ont compar t ment of

    18 t he wave r unner , cor r ect ?

    19 A. I bel i eve so. Fr om Mr s. Davi s' s

    20 i nt er vi ew, I bel i eve so.

    21 Q. And t hi s i s t he f i r st t i me anyone t ol d you

    22 he was r eachi ng i n t he f r ont compar t ment when he was

    23 shot , cor r ect ?

    24 A. That was her st atement , yes.

    25 Q. Now, she t ol d you i n her st at ement t hat

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    30/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    199

    1 she r ecal l ed t el l i ng t he of f i cer s t hat t he man had a

    2 gun and t o l ook f or a gun, cor r ect ?

    3 A. That i s cor r ect .

    4 Q. Di d you ever ask her , "Ma' am, why di dn' t

    5 you t el l us t hat i t was i n t he f r ont compar t ment "?

    6 A. I don' t know i f I asked her t hat speci f i c

    7 quest i on, but she expl ai ned t hat i n her i nt er vi ew.

    8 Q. How di d she expl ai n t hat ?

    9 A. Wel l , she expl ai ned t hat she saw hi m l ean

    10 f or war d put t i ng somet hi ng i n t he f r ont compar t ment ,

    11 whi ch she bel i eved t o be t he gun t hat he was hol di ng

    12 i n hi s hands, and t hen he agai n l eaned i n t he f r ont

    13 compar t ment , whi ch i s why she t hought he was goi ng

    14 t o shoot her .

    15 Q. Ri ght , whi ch i t woul d seem t hat her , mor e

    16 t han anybody el se i n t he whol e wor l d, woul d want

    17 somebody t o l ook i n t hat f r ont compar t ment and l ook

    18 f or t he gun, r i ght ? I mean, t hat ' s t he t hi ng t hat

    19 was causi ng her t he f ear t o shoot somebody i n t he

    20 head had der i ved f r om, was t hi s f r ont compar t ment

    21 t hat supposedl y i n her mi nd cont ai ned a gun.

    22 Now, she t ol d you i n her st at ement t hat

    23 she r ecal l ed t el l i ng t he of f i cer s t hat he had a gun

    24 and t hat t hey shoul d l ook f or i t . But why di dn' t

    25 you t el l her , "Ma' am, why di dn' t you t el l us t o l ook

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    31/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    200

    1 i n t he f r ont compar t ment ?"

    2 A. Why di dn' t I say t hat t o her ?

    3 Q. Yes, I mean, t hat woul d seem l ogi cal .

    4 "Ma' am, you were at t he scene. We are here wi t h t he

    5 pol i ce of f i cer s. You have a cr i mi nal def ense l awyer

    6 st andi ng r i ght next t o you. You' r e pr of f er i ng

    7 st at ement s. The one pi ece of evi dence t hat i s

    8 excul pat or y, t hat pr oves you j ust i f i ed i n shoot i ng

    9 t hi s f el l ow, i s t he gun. "

    10 Why woul dn' t she, among al l t he peopl e

    11 t hat wer e out t her e, woul d want t o f i nd t hat gun?

    12 You had suba di ver s l ooki ng al l ar ound t he wat er

    13 l ooki ng f or i t . Why di dn' t you ask her , "Ma' am, why

    14 di dn' t you t el l me t he gun was i n t he f r ont

    15 compar t ment ? I was st andi ng r i ght t her e. "

    16 MR. MURPHY: Obj ect i on, J udge,

    17 argument at i ve.

    18 THE COURT: Over r ul ed.

    19 Q. You don' t have an answer t o t hat ?

    20 A. No, no, no. The way you' r e ani mat ed, I

    21 don' t know, I ' m j ust not l i ke t hat . So I don' t know

    22 why I di dn' t t el l her , ma' am, I can' t bel i eve you

    23 di dn' t t el l me. That ' s not how I spoke t o her .

    24 Q. Now, al so at t hat poi nt , because we know

    25 Reynal do was deaf and mut e, t he st or y changed a

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    32/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    201

    1 l i t t l e bi t f r om her f i r st st at ement . Her f i r st

    2 st at ement was, " I sai d I had a gun" and he

    3 r esponded, " I have a gun, t oo. "

    4 Now her st at ement says he' s onl y sayi ng

    5 one wor d, "gun. " I s t hat r i ght ?

    6 A. I don' t know t hat her st at ement ever was

    7 t hat he st at ed, " I have a gun, t oo. " I don' t know

    8 t hat . She t ol d me t hat he sai d, "gun, " and t hat he

    9 had what she bel i eved was a gun i n hi s hands.

    10 Q. Wel l , i n At t or ney Rat zan' s pr of f er t o you

    11 at t he scene, she pr of f er ed t o you on behal f of Ms.

    12 J asmi ne Davi s t he f ol l owi ng quot e, " J asmi ne t ol d t he

    13 man she had a gun and t he man sai d he had a gun,

    14 t oo, " r i ght ?

    15 A. So unl ess you' r e quot i ng f r om my r epor t , I

    16 di dn' t use quot at i ons and t her e i s not quot e t her e.

    17 Q. But you - -

    18 A. I t says, " J asmi ne t ol d t he man she had a

    19 gun and t he man sai d he had a gun, t oo. " I t i s

    20 r easonabl e t o me t hat by sayi ng, "gun, " havi ng

    21 somet hi ng t hat l ooks l i ke gun, coul d be sai d he had

    22 a gun, t oo.

    23 Q. But now she t el l s you i n her st at ement

    24 t hat t he onl y t hi ng she hear d was maybe t he word,

    25 "gun, " r i ght ?

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    33/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    202

    1 A. I don' t know i f she sai d maybe t hat ' s what

    2 she hear d, but she t ol d me t hat she hear d hi m say

    3 "gun. "

    4 Q. And, agai n, i n her st or y t hat she pr ovi ded

    5 t o you i n her st at ement , she i s not sayi ng t hat he

    6 sai d gun i n r esponse t o her command. He j ust

    7 sol i ci t s - - he j ust says t he wor d "gun, " r i ght when

    8 he i s st andi ng next t o t he wave r unner wi t h

    9 somet hi ng bl ack i n hi s hands, r i ght ?

    10 A. I don' t know. I woul d have t o l ook

    11 t hr ough and r ead i t agai n.

    12 Q. Let ' s see i f we can f i nd i t t oget her .

    13 A. I ' m sor r y, what page ar e we on?

    14 Q. I t ' s on Page 35. I t ' s on Page 38.

    15 A. Page 38 at t he t op.

    16 Q. Yes, at t he t op.

    17 So, I mean, she doesn' t say anyt hi ng about

    18 t he f act t hat she sai d she had a gun and t hen he

    19 sai d he had a gun, t oo. She j ust basi cal l y says

    20 t hat she l ost t r ack of hi m f or a second, t hen he

    21 popped out f r om behi nd t he wave runner , whi ch was on

    22 t he el ect r i cal l i f t i n t he backyar d. The man t hen

    23 came ar ound t o t he f r ont of t he wave r unner and she

    24 not i ced t he f r ont of t he hood of t he wave r unner

    25 open. She hear d t he man say, " quot e, unquot e - - and

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    34/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    203

    1 t hi s one i s i n quot es, "gun, " r i ght ?

    2 A. That ' s cor r ect .

    3 Q. So i t ' s no l onger i n r esponse t o her

    4 sayi ng, " I have a gun, " and t hen he says, " I have a

    5 gun, t oo" or "gun" i n r esponse t o her , i t ' s j ust he

    6 goes by t he wave r unner and says, "gun"?

    7 A. Ri ght , I don' t know t hat anywher e i t says

    8 t hat hi s st at ement was i n di r ect r esponse t o her s.

    9 She sai d she had a gun and he sai d he had a gun,

    10 t oo. So sayi ng "gun, " t hat f i t s.

    11 Q. Ri ght , but i f i t had been t he ot her way,

    12 i f i t had been t he way she or i gi nal l y wr i t t en down,

    13 her sayi ng, " I have a gun, " and he sai d, " I have a

    14 gun, t oo, " i f i t was t hat way, i t r eal l y coul dn' t

    15 have happened t hat way because he was deaf . So he

    16 coul dn' t have r esponded t o her when she was t al ki ng

    17 t o hi m, r i ght ?

    18 A. Wel l , he pr obabl y di dn' t f or m t he sent ence

    19 because he coul dn' t do t hat . I have a gun, t oo, I

    20 don' t bel i eve t hat he ever sai d t hat .

    21 Q. And he coul dn' t have r esponded t o her

    22 ver bal commands because he coul dn' t hear , r i ght ?

    23 A. Of cour se he coul d r espond t o her

    24 commands. He coul d r ead l i ps.

    25 Q. Okay.

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    35/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    204

    1 A. So I don' t know why - - he coul d def i ni t el y

    2 r espond t o her .

    3 Q. So i t ' s your i nt er pr et at i on t hat i n t hi s

    4 moment of anar chy and ever yt hi ng el se, he' s l ooki ng

    5 at her and r eadi ng her l i ps of " I have a gun, " and

    6 t hat ' s how you sor t of r ect i f y t hi s?

    7 A. I have no i ssue wi t h t hat . He coul d ver y

    8 wel l be r eadi ng her l i ps and hear her say t hat she

    9 has a gun. That di dn' t seem unr easonabl e t o me.

    10 Q. Now, dur i ng t he st at ement she al so t ol d

    11 you t hat when she wal ked out t he backdoor , she

    12 not i ced t here was a st r anger i n her yar d, number

    13 one. She not i ced t hat t he wave r unner was uncover ed

    14 and t he f ami l y' s boat was not i n t he backyar d and

    15 t he east st orage cl oset was open and t hat ' s when she

    16 became scar ed, cor r ect ?

    17 A. I don' t know i f t hose t hi ngs happened i n

    18 t he or der t hat you j ust sai d, but al l of t hose

    19 t hi ngs di d occur .

    20 Q. But t hat ' s when she got scar ed i s when she

    21 came out t he backdoor and not i ced t hose t hi ngs,

    22 r i ght ?

    23 A. Wel l , she wasn' t scared when she went out

    24 t he backdoor . She became scared as a r esul t of al l

    25 of t hose t hi ngs t hat wer e happeni ng.

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    36/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    205

    1 Q. Now, l et me ask you i f you r emember t hi s

    2 quest i on and t hi s answer on Page 57 of your

    3 deposi t i on.

    4 "Q. So at t he t i me she began t o get

    5 scar ed, she was wal ki ng down t o t he st orage ar ea

    6 t owar ds t he seawal l . I s t hat r i ght ?

    7 "A. I t appear s as t hough she wal ked out

    8 t he backyard. She hadn' t wal ked al l t he way down or

    9 t owar ds t he seawal l . She j ust wal ked out of her

    10 backdoor .

    11 "Q. She j ust wal ked out of her backdoor ,

    12 not i ced t hese t hi ngs and began t o get scar ed. I s

    13 t hat what she t ol d you?

    14 "A. Yes. "

    15 Do you r emember gi vi ng t hat t est i mony?

    16 A. Yes.

    17 Q. So J asmi ne t ol d you t hat as soon as she

    18 got out t he backdoor , t hat ' s when she st ar t ed t o get

    19 scar ed, r i ght ?

    20 A. No. What I sai d t hen and what I am sayi ng

    21 now i s t hat when she came out si de of her backdoor ,

    22 af t er al l of t he t hi ngs t hat she obser ved and t he

    23 t hi ngs t hat wer e happeni ng, she got scared.

    24 Q. That ' s what you t ol d me i n your

    25 deposi t i on, r i ght , what I j ust r ead, r i ght ?

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    37/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    206

    1 A. Whi ch i s t he same t hi ng I ' m sayi ng r i ght

    2 now.

    3 Q. Okay.

    4 Now, you f i nal l y i nt er vi ewed J ack Davi s on

    5 November 29, 2011, si x mont hs af t er t he shoot i ng.

    6 We t al ked about t hat , r i ght ?

    7 A. That i s cor r ect .

    8 Q. And one of t he mai n t hi ngs he sai d was he

    9 shot because hi s mot her t ol d hi m t hat t he f el l ow i n

    10 t he wat er had a gun, r i ght ?

    11 A. Ri ght .

    12 Q. Now, you al r eady t ol d t he Cour t you

    13 l i st ened t o t he 911 t ape. Fi r st of al l , t hr oughout

    14 t he 911 t ape, Ms. J asmi ne Davi s i s t al ki ng i n a ver y

    15 exci t ed and i n a hi gh, al most scr eami ng on t he 911

    16 t ape, cor r ect ?

    17 A. I r ecal l her bei ng ver y exci t ed, yes.

    18 Q. And you never heard on t hat 911 t ape her

    19 say t o her son, "He' s got a gun"?

    20 A. I don' t r ecal l hear i ng t hat . I haven' t

    21 l i st ened t o t he 911 t ape f or qui t e some t i me.

    22 Q. Wel l , i sn' t t hat what a l ead i nvest i gat or

    23 i s supposed t o do? You got t wo f ol ks t hat have

    24 al r eady l i ed t o you. You know t hei r cr edi bi l i t y

    25 f r om t he day t hi s i nvest i gat i on st ar t ed shoul d be

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    38/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    207

    1 di mi ni shed because t hey have al r eady l i ed t o t he

    2 pol i ce of f i cer s and now you got hi m sayi ng t he sol e

    3 r eason I shot was because my mom t ol d me he had a

    4 gun. Woul dn' t you go back t o t he 911 t ape and see

    5 whet her you ever hear d her t el l her son i n t hi s

    6 exci t ed voi ce, "He' s got a gun. Be car ef ul , he' s

    7 got a gun?"

    8 Woul dn' t you at l east do t hat t o

    9 i nvest i gat e whet her hi s st or y t hat he' s t el l i ng i s

    10 t r ue or not ?

    11 A. As I sai d, I ' m sur e I l i s tened t o t he

    12 t ape. I di dn' t make a not at i on. I don' t r ecal l

    13 hear i ng her say t hat .

    14 Q. I mean, whet her she sai d t hat t o hi m or

    15 not i s cr uci al t o your i nvest i gat i on, i sn' t i t ?

    16 A. That she t ol d hi m he had a gun? He i s - -

    17 i s i t i mpor t ant ? I t ' s al l i mpor t ant .

    18 Q. Wel l , I mean, wi t hout her t el l i ng hi m he' s

    19 got a gun, he' s got no r easonabl e f ear f or hi s l i f e

    20 because t here i s no gun. He di dn' t know t here was a

    21 gun out t her e. He never saw a gun.

    22 A. Hi s f ear was f r om hi s mot her , hi s mot her ' s

    23 r eact i on t o what was goi ng on. He was r eact i ng of f

    24 of hi s mot her , cl ear l y.

    25 Q. Cl ear l y, but t hat doesn' t gi ve you a r i ght

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    39/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    208

    1 t o shoot somebody i n t he head. What he sai d i s I

    2 shot because I was i n f ear f or my l i f e because my

    3 mom t ol d me he had a gun.

    4 So t hat ' s r eal l y t he key par t of usi ng

    5 deadl y f or ce i s t hat he i s i n f ear f or hi s l i f e,

    6 r i ght ?

    7 A. Ri ght . I bel i eve he was i n f ear f or hi s

    8 l i f e.

    9 Q. And t he r eason he' s i n f ear f or hi s l i f e

    10 i s because he f eel s l i ke t he f el l ow i n t he wat er has

    11 a gun and t he way he der i ves t hat i nf ormat i on,

    12 accor di ng t o hi s st at ement , i s hi s mot her t el l s hi m

    13 he' s got a gun. That ' s what he t ol d you, r i ght ?

    14 A. Yes, t hat ' s what he sai d.

    15 Q. So t hen my quest i on t o you i s, do you

    16 speci f i cal l y r ecal l af t er he gave t hi s st at ement

    17 goi ng back t o t he 911 t ape t o see whet her t here was

    18 any r ecor di ng of t he mot her t el l i ng t he son he' s got

    19 a gun?

    20 A. I j ust t ol d you t hat I l i st ened t o t he 911

    21 t ape and I di d not hear her say t hat . I t doesn' t

    22 mean she di dn' t say i t . I di d not hear her say t hat

    23 on t he 911 t ape.

    24 Q. Now, somet hi ng el se t hat he t ol d you i n

    25 hi s st at ement was t hat when he t ook t he wave r unner

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    40/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    209

    1 and st ar t ed t o go out t o t he bay and l eave t he

    2 pr emi ses, t hat hi s mot her sai d i n an exci t ed way and

    3 you put quot es on t hi s - -

    4 A. What page?

    5 Q. I t ' s wher e he gi ves hi s st at ement , but I

    6 wi l l f i nd i t f or you.

    7 A. On Page 47?

    8 Q. I t hi nk t hat ' s i t .

    9 A. Okay.

    10 Q. Ri ght . I wi l l quot e i t f or you. He t ol d

    11 you, " J ack' s mot her sai d t o hi m t o wai t . She was

    12 exci t ed and sai d, " and you wr ot e t hi s one i n quot es,

    13 "Wai t ! Wai t ! Wai t ! Ver y qui ckl y. They st ar t ed t o

    14 f eel r el i ef t he man was goi ng t o l eave. "

    15 I asked you agai n, "She sai d t hi s i n an

    16 exci t ed and l oud manner , wai t , wai t , he' s l eavi ng. "

    17 Di d you ever go back t o t he 911 t ape t o see whet her

    18 you coul d ver i f y whet her she i n f act r eal l y di d say

    19 that?

    20 A. I t ol d you t hat I l i st ened t o t he 911

    21 t ape.

    22 Q. Di d you hear J asmi ne Davi s scr eami ng,

    23 "Wai t , wai t , wai t "?

    24 A. I don' t r ecal l her screami ng, "Wai t , wai t ,

    25 wai t . "

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    41/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    210

    1 Q. I mean, don' t you agr ee i f t he 911 t ape,

    2 whi ch was r ecor di ng cont emporaneousl y wi t h t hi s

    3 event happeni ng, doesn' t suppor t t hese st at ement s

    4 t hat ar e gi ven si x mont hs l at er , t her e i s some

    5 cont r adi ct i on her e?

    6 A. I have no i ssue wi t h i t . The phone coul d

    7 have been away f r om her mout h. Maybe i t wasn' t next

    8 t o her mout h when she was t al ki ng.

    9 Q. But t hese ar e f ol ks - -

    10 A. I have no i ssue wi t h t hat what soever .

    11 Q. These f ol ks al r eady have di mi ni shed

    12 credi bi l i t y wi t h you. You t ol d us t hat , because

    13 t hey l i ed, bot h of t hem di d, r i ght of f t he bat ,

    14 r i ght ?

    15 A. They di dn' t l i e t o me. What I was t ol d by

    16 t he ot her of f i cer s was not t he same t hi ng I was t ol d

    17 by J ack and J asmi ne. So t hey never l i ed t o me.

    18 Q. You knew t hat t hese f ol ks, t he ver y f i r st

    19 t hi ng t hey di d when t al ki ng t o pol i ce of f i cer s af t er

    20 t hi s shoot i ng, was t o l i e. You knew t hat , di dn' t

    21 you?

    22 A. That was t he st at ement t hat t hey made,

    23 yes.

    24 Q. And we al r eady t al ked about t hat . At t he

    25 ver y begi nni ng of my cr oss exami nat i on I sai d t o you

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    42/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    211

    1 when peopl e l i e t o t he pol i ce, you have t o put a

    2 l i t t l e mar k, cr edi bi l i t y i s a f act or and you agr eed

    3 wi t h t hat . Cr edi bi l i t y has t o be l ooked at ,

    4 correct?

    5 A. I woul d agr ee wi t h t hat , but I t hi nk you

    6 al so t ake t he t ot al i t y of t he ci r cumst ances and you

    7 t r y t o under st and - - as pol i ce of f i cer s, we t r y t o

    8 under st and why do peopl e l i e? What i s t hei r

    9 mot i vat i on? What ' s goi ng on? Peopl e l i e t o t he

    10 pol i ce al l t he t i me.

    11 Q. Absol ut el y. And t hen you go back and t r y

    12 and pul l out obj ect i ve evi dence and compar e i t t o

    13 t hei r s tat ement s t o see i f i t al l j i ves , r i ght ?

    14 A. That ' s r i ght .

    15 Q. Because t hat way, you got t hese peopl e

    16 t hat have some di mi ni shed credi bi l i t y, t hey l i ed, we

    17 know t hat , so now we' ve got t o real l y hol d t hem up

    18 t o t he br i ght l i ght of obj ect i ve f act s and see

    19 whet her we can support what ' s comi ng out of t hei r

    20 mout h.

    21 So i t seems l i ke you woul d go back t o t he

    22 911 t ape and see whether you coul d ver i f y t hese

    23 st at ement s t hat J ack was maki ng on t he 911 t ape.

    24 Di d you do t hat ?

    25 A. I j ust t ol d you t hat I l i st ened t o i t and

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    43/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    212

    1 I di dn' t hear , "Wai t , wai t , wai t , " nor di d I hear

    2 t hat he had a gun. I ' m not sur e what el se you' r e

    3 aski ng.

    4 Q. Wel l , t hat ' s what I was aski ng.

    5 A. Wel l , I answer ed t hat t wi ce al r eady.

    6 Q. Now, t he obj ect i ve evi dence ot her t han t he

    7 st at ement s t hat were gi ven by J asmi ne and J ack was,

    8 number one, you gat her ed up f i nger pr i nt s t hat we

    9 know you wer en' t abl e t o gat her any - - I f or get what

    10 t he cr i mi nal cour t uses, but i t ' s any evi dence t hat

    11 was of val ue f or t he f i nger pr i nt s t hat you guys

    12 t ook. I s t hat cor r ect ?

    13 A. That i s cor r ect .

    14 Q. Then you t ook DNA al l over t he scene, not

    15 al l over t he scene, but i n cer t ai n l ocat i ons and you

    16 wer e abl e t o gat her no evi dence t hat was of val ue

    17 wi t h t he DNA t est i ng. I s t hat r i ght ?

    18 A. That ' s cor r ect .

    19 Q. And you were hopi ng t o suppor t Ms. Davi s' s

    20 and J ack' s st at ement t hat he was al l t he way up by

    21 t he f r ont of t he st or age f aci l i t y because maybe hi s

    22 DNA had t r ansf er r ed ont o t he door or maybe hi s

    23 f i nger pr i nt s had t r ansf er r ed i n t he ar ea t hat was up

    24 by t he house, cor r ect ?

    25 A. Wel l , t hat ' s t he r eason we swabbed t he

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    44/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    213

    1 door and dust ed t he door s t o see i f we can f i nd hi s

    2 f i nger pr i nt s.

    3 Q. And you never f ound any obj ect i ve evi dence

    4 t hat suppor t ed t hat he was up by t he house?

    5 A. We had a negat i ve r esul t wi t h t he

    6 f i nger pr i nt s and t he DNA.

    7 Q. So t her e was no obj ect i ve evi dence t o

    8 suppor t t he st at ement of J asmi ne t hat he was up by

    9 t he st or age f aci l i t i es, cor r ect ?

    10 A. Yeah, t hat ' s r i ght .

    11 Q. You al so had obj ect i ve evi dence t hat

    12 Reynal do had been shot f r om behi nd and t he bul l et s

    13 wer e comi ng f r om t he back r i ght t o t he back par t of

    14 hi s head. I s t hat r i ght ?

    15 A. I ' m showi ng on t he r i ght si de. Back t o

    16 f r ont , r i ght si de.

    17 Q. But back t o f r ont , cor r ect ?

    18 A. I bel i eve t hat ' s what t he aut opsy says.

    19 Q. You obvi ousl y went down and t al ked t o t he

    20 medi cal exami ner t o make sur e you knew exact l y what

    21 hi s f i ndi ng wer e and hi s opi ni ons wer e as a r esul t

    22 of where t he shoot er was when he got hi t wi t h t he

    23 bul l et s, r i ght ?

    24 A. That was di scussed, yes.

    25 Q. And he t ol d you t hat t he shooter was

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    45/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    214

    1 behi nd hi m r i ght t o l ef t , back t o f r ont ?

    2 A. I t was on t he r i ght si de. So back t o

    3 f r ont .

    4 Q. The bul l et s wer e comi ng f r om behi nd?

    5 A. Fr om t he r i ght si de. Not f r om behi nd.

    6 Fr om t he r i ght si de and back t o f r ont and sl i ght l y

    7 downward, I bel i eve. You have a copy of t he aut opsy

    8 r epor t , r i ght ?

    9 Q. I do, and we have t aken hi s deposi t i on so

    10 t he Cour t wi l l be abl e t o r ead t hat , but you

    11 r emember me aski ng t hi s quest i on and you gi vi ng t hi s

    12 answer on Page 58:

    13 "Q. So he had t o have been f aci ng away

    14 f r om t he gun when he was shot . I s t hat r i ght ?

    15 "A. The back of hi s head was t owards t he

    16 gun, yes.

    17 "Q. Okay, and you t hi nk t hat he was

    18 f aci ng when he was shot t owar ds t he bay or do you

    19 t hi nk he was f aci ng t owar ds t he pr oper t y?

    20 "A. Wel l , i f t hey wer e st andi ng on t he

    21 seawal l and he was shot i n t he back t owar d t he

    22 f r ont , t hen he woul d have had t o have been f aci ng

    23 t owar ds t he bay. "

    24 Do you r emember gi vi ng t hose answer s?

    25 A. Yes.

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    46/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    215

    1 Q. And you agr ee wi t h t hat as you si t her e

    2 t oday?

    3 A. Yes, f r om r i ght si de, back t o f r ont , yes,

    4 he woul d have t o be f aci ng t he bay.

    5 MR. DURKEE: Thank you. I have no f ur t her

    6 quest i ons.

    7 THE COURT: Redi r ect .

    8 MR. MURPHY: Yes.

    9 MR. DURKEE: Oh, I have one f ur t her one,

    10 Your Honor . I ' m sor r y.

    11 THE COURT: That ' s okay.

    12 Q. ( By Mr . Dur kee) I ' m goi ng t o show you now

    13 what has been mar ked as Pl ai nt i f f ' s 1- L f or I D and

    14 what was pr evi ousl y marked as 1- K f or I D.

    15 You i nst r uct ed or somebody i nst r uct ed t he

    16 cr i me scene i nvest i gat or s t o t ake a pi ct ur e of J ack

    17 and t o t ake a pi ct ur e of t he shi r t he had on when he

    18 di d t he shoot i ng. I s t hat r i ght ?

    19 A. Yes.

    20 Q. By t he t i me t he pol i ce had got t en t her e,

    21 J ack had al r eady changed hi s shi r t , number one,

    22 true?

    23 A. He was wear i ng a di f f er ent shi r t .

    24 Q. And t he shi r t t hat he had on dur i ng t he

    25 shoot i ng had al r eady been pl aced i n a bucket wi t h

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    47/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    216

    1 soapy wat er and had t o be ret r i eved by t he pol i ce,

    2 correct?

    3 A. Yes. The Davi s housekeeper was ver y

    4 ef f i ci ent .

    5 Q. To say t he l east .

    6 Now, you have i nvest i gat ed l ot s of

    7 homi ci des and ever yt hi ng el se. I mean, you

    8 underst and t hat peopl e may t r y and cover up

    9 evi dence, cor r ect ?

    10 A. Peopl e do t hat , yes.

    11 Q. Di d t hi s r ai se any suspi ci on t o you t hat

    12 wi t hi n t he f i r s t hal f hour , wi t hi n t he f i r s t f ew

    13 mi nut es af t er t he shoot i ng, t hat t he shoot er had

    14 al r eady changed shi r t s and t he bl oody shi r t had been

    15 put i n somet hi ng t o cl ean i t ? Di d t hat r ai se any

    16 suspi ci on t o you at al l ?

    17 A. No.

    18 MR. DURKEE: Okay. Thank you. I have no

    19 f ur t her quest i ons.

    20 THE COURT: Redi r ect .

    21 MR. MURPHY: Yes.

    22 REDI RECT EXAMI NATI ON

    23 BY MR. MURPHY:

    24 Q. Det ect i ve Nye, j ust a f ew f ol l ow- up

    25 quest i ons. You wer e posed quest i ons f r om t he

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    48/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    217

    1 l awyer , whi ch I t hi nk you pr obabl y f i gur ed out wer e

    2 goi ng t owar d t he gi st of an ar gument t hat t he cr i me

    3 scene was somehow cont ami nat ed and wi t nesses wer e

    4 not bei ng sequest er ed. Di d you get t hat i mpr essi on

    5 f r om t he quest i ons?

    6 A. Yes.

    7 Q. Now, consi der i ng what was br ought up, di d

    8 any of t hat i n t hi s i nvest i gat i on ever cause you or

    9 l ead you t o bel i eve t hat because of any al l eged

    10 sequest r at i on pr obl ems or cr i me scene cont ami nat i on,

    11 t hat t he Davi ses wer e not i n l egi t i mat e f ear of t he

    12 t hr eat t hat t hey wer e r epor t i ng based upon t hat

    13 al l eged cont ami nat i on and sequest r at i on of wi t ness

    14 probl ems?

    15 MR. DURKEE: Obj ect i on, Your Honor .

    16 THE COURT: I ' m goi ng t o over r ul e t hat

    17 obj ect i on t he way i t was phr ased. You may

    18 answer .

    19 A. I t has no af f ect on t hei r absol ut e f ear

    20 and t er r or , none what soever .

    21 Q. Counsel asked you a l ot of quest i ons about

    22 t he f i r st l i e t hat t hey t ol d you and t hat t he l i e,

    23 and we tal ked about i t and i t has been acknowl edged

    24 i n t hi s case, t hat i s, t he f act t hat J asmi ne Davi s

    25 at t he out set sai d t hat she was t he one t hat shot

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    49/153

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    50/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    219

    1 i nt egr i t y or cr edi t abi l i t y of t hei r ver si on of what

    2 happened and t he f ear and t hr eat t hat t hey

    3 exper i enced?

    4 MR. DURKEE: Obj ect i on.

    5 THE COURT: Over r ul ed.

    6 A. No, not at al l .

    7 Q. You were asked some quest i ons about i f you

    8 coul d have - - r emember t he quest i ons about , wai t ,

    9 wai t , wai t ? Remember t hose quest i ons scr eami ng,

    10 wai t , wai t , wai t ?

    11 A. Yes.

    12 Q. And you were di r ect ed t o Page 47 of your

    13 r epor t , r emember?

    14 A. Yes.

    15 Q. And r emember t he at t orney I t hi nk was

    16 sayi ng somet hi ng about - - he sai d i n an exci t ed

    17 t one, wai t , wai t , wai t , and he was act ual l y shout i ng

    18 i t more t han exci t ed. Do you r emember t hat quest i on

    19 a f ew mi nut es ago?

    20 A. Yes.

    21 Q. I woul d l i ke t o di r ect you t o Page 47 and

    22 I t hi nk t he passage t hat we wer e deal i ng wi t h t hat

    23 he was r ef er enci ng appear s t o be t he l ast sent ence

    24 i n t hat mi ddl e par agr aph. Do you see t hat ?

    25 A. Yes, I do.

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    51/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    220

    1 Q. Coul d you r ead t hat ? And t hi s i s a

    2 par aphr asi ng of t he st at ement t hat J ack gave t o you,

    3 correct?

    4 A. Yes.

    5 Q. Wi t h r egar d t o t hat , wai t , wai t , wai t

    6 i ssue, coul d you pl ease r ead what you r epor t ed t hat

    7 J ack sai d i n t hat st at ement ver bat i m, wor d f or wor d?

    8 A. " J ack' s mot her sai d f or hi m t o wai t . She

    9 was ver y exci t ed and sai d, wai t , wai t , wai t ver y

    10 qui ckl y. "

    11 Q. Hol d on. Let ' s t ake i t sl owl y. That l ast

    12 sent ence, do you see t hat l ast sent ence t hat says,

    13 "She was exci t ed"?

    14 A. Uh- huh.

    15 Q. Do you see t hat ?

    16 A. Yes.

    17 Q. Read t hat sent ence, i f you coul d, i n i t s

    18 ent i r et y and ver y sl owl y, pl ease.

    19 A. "She was exci t ed and sai d" - -

    20 Q. Fi r st par t of i t i s, "She was exci t ed. "

    21 We al l agr ee t hat she was exci t ed, r i ght ?

    22 A. Yes.

    23 Q. Next par t of i t .

    24 A. "She was exci t ed and sai d, wai t , wai t ,

    25 wai t ver y qui ckl y. " That ' s i t .

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    52/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    221

    1 Q. I t says, "She was exci t ed and t hen sai d,

    2 wai t , wai t , wai t . " I t doesn' t char act er i ze how she

    3 sai d i t . I t doesn' t say t hat she was screami ng i t .

    4 I t j ust st at es t hat she was exci t ed and t hen sai d

    5 wai t , wai t , wai t , ver y qui ckl y, " r i ght ?

    6 A. Yes.

    7 Q. So t hat ' s t he descr i pt i on of t he wai t ,

    8 wai t , wai t , r i ght ? Not t hat i t was shout ed, not

    9 t hat i t was scr eamed, but t hat i t was sai d ver y

    10 qui ckl y, cor r ect ?

    11 A. That ' s cor r ect .

    12 Q. And t hat ' s exact l y what t hat sent ence

    13 sai d?

    14 A. That ' s cor r ect .

    15 MR. MURPHY: That ' s al l I have.

    16 MR. DURKEE: May I have a br i ef r ecr oss?

    17 THE COURT: I f i t ' s on somet hi ng new.

    18 MR. DURKEE: One quest i on.

    19 THE COURT: Go ahead.

    20 RECROSS EXAMI NATI ON

    21 BY MR. DURKEE:

    22 Q. You know what an excl amat i on poi nt i s,

    23 r i ght ?

    24 A. I do.

    25 Q. I mean, you' r e wr i t i ng a pol i ce r epor t on

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    53/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    222

    1 a homi ci de, you want t o be as absol ut el y accur at e as

    2 you possi bl y can be, r i ght ?

    3 A. That ' s cor r ect .

    4 Q. What does an excl amat i on poi nt mean?

    5 A. An excl amat i on poi nt i s somet hi ng t hat

    6 says wi t h emphasi s.

    7 Q. And t hi s i s one of t he ar eas i n your

    8 r epor t t hat you act ual l y used quot at i on mar ks

    9 because you want ed t o capt ur e ver bat i m what J ack

    10 t ol d you, cor r ect ?

    11 A. That ' s cor r ect .

    12 Q. And you wr ot e i n quot at i on marks, "Wai t !

    13 Wai t ! Wai t , " so t hat you accur at el y and compl et el y

    14 capt ur e what J ack t ol d you, cor r ect ?

    15 A. That i s r i ght , because he sai d, "wai t ,

    16 wai t , wai t . "

    17 MR. DURKEE: No f ur t her quest i ons.

    18 THE COURT: Let me ask a quest i on. When

    19 you t ook f i nger pr i nt s t o t r y t o l i f t pr i nt s f r om

    20 t he door s or any of t he DNA, were t here any

    21 el i mi nat i on pr i nt s or DNA t aken f r om t he peopl e

    22 who r esi ded i n t he house?

    23 THE WI TNESS: I woul d have t o l ook and

    24 see. I don' t r ecal l , but t her e was not hi ng of

    25 val ue. I t was such a mi x of DNA, t here was

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    54/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    223

    1 not hi ng t hat coul d be ext r act ed of any val ue.

    2 THE COURT: Were t he f i ngerpr i nt s or were

    3 any suf f i ci ent poi nt of i dent i f i cat i on, wer e

    4 t hey of any val ue, do you now?

    5 THE WI TNESS: No, t her e was no val ue

    6 what soever .

    7 THE COURT: Al l r i ght . Thank you.

    8 Anythi ng el se?

    9 MR. DURKEE: No, Your Honor .

    10 THE COURT: Thank you, Det ect i ve

    11 Nye- Gonzal ez. You may st ep down.

    12 ( Wi t ness excused. )

    13 THE COURT: We have been goi ng f or an

    14 hour , what do we have l ef t ?

    15 MR. MURPHY: J udge, f r om our poi nt of

    16 vi ew, we j ust woul d admi t recor ds i nt o evi dence

    17 and ot her t han t hat we woul d r est .

    18 MR. DURKEE: That ' s goi ng t o t ake some

    19 t i me because he j ust want s t he whol e t hi ng

    20 submi t t ed and I don' t thi nk al l of i t shoul d be

    21 submi t t ed.

    22 MR. MURPHY: Al l of what ?

    23 THE COURT: That ' s why we ar e goi ng t o

    24 t ake a break now f or 15 mi nut es and you guys can

    25 t al k on t he br eak and t hen I wi l l come out and

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    55/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    224

    1 l i st en t o t he r est . So I wi l l be back i n about

    2 15 mi nut es.

    3 ( Recess t aken. )

    4 THE COURT: So Mr . Mur phy?

    5 MR. MURPHY: We' r e j ust goi ng t o move our

    6 exhi bi t s f or I D i nt o evi dence and t hen some

    7 ot her evi dence, but I t hi nk Mr . Dur kee sai d he

    8 want ed t o go t hr ough i t f i r st . I don' t know

    9 t hat we have a di sagr eement .

    10 THE COURT: That ' s f i ne.

    11 MR. DURKEE: J ust admi ni st r at i ve at t he

    12 end, Your Honor . We al so agr eed t o f our

    13 deposi t i ons bei ng submi t t ed t o t he Cour t i n

    14 t hei r ent i r et y.

    15 And we have bot h gi ven t he Cour t

    16 desi gnat i ons as t o what t he def endant , or t he

    17 par t y wi t h t he bur den of pr oof i n t hi s hear i ng,

    18 has desi gnat ed and al so what we have desi gnat ed

    19 as t o what we f eel you shoul d concent r at e on.

    20 THE COURT: What are t he f our deposi t i ons?

    21 MR. MURPHY: We sent i n a bi nder wi t h

    22 t hem, pl us desi gnat i ons.

    23 THE COURT: Di d you?

    24 MR. MURPHY: Yes.

    25 THE COURT: When?

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    56/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    225

    1 MR. MURPHY: Two weeks ago.

    2 THE COURT: We have t o f i nd i t , t hen. I

    3 want t