evidentiary hearing day 2, 2011 killing of reynaldo muñoz
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz
1/153
Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014
Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460
www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047
170
I N THE CI RCUI T COURT OF THE 11TH J UDI CI AL CI RCUI T I N AND FOR MI AMI - DADE COUNTY, FLORI DA
GENERAL J URI SDI CTI ON DI VI SI ON
CASE NO. : 11- 037237 CA 23
REYNALDO MUNOZ, SR. , as survi vi ng f at herand as Per sonal Repr esent at i ve of t he Est at eof REYNALDO MUNOZ, J R. , and CARI DAD LOPEZ,as survi vi ng mot her ,
Pl ai nt i f f s,vs.
J EFFREY DAVI S, i ndi vi dual l y and as parent
of mi nor chi l d, J ACK DAVI S, and YASMI NEDAVI S, i ndi vi dual l y and as par ent of mi norchi l d, J ACK DAVI S,
Def endant s.____________________________________________/
73 West Fl agl er St r eet , Mi ami , Fl or i da, Monday, 1: 30 p. m. , December 29, 2014.
The hear i ng i n t he above- ent i t l ed cause r esume
bef or e The Honor abl e St anf or d Bl ake, Ci r cui t Cour t
J udge, af t er t he l uncheon r ecess.
APPEARANCES:
ROBERTS & DURKEE, P. A. , by DAVI D DURKEE, Esqui r e, and
ALVAREZ RODRI GUEZ, by J UAN L. ALVAREZ, Esqui r e, and J OEL S. PERWI N, P. A. , by J OEL S. PERWI N, Esqui r e, At t or neys f or Pl ai nt i f f s .
-
8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz
2/153
Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014
Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460
www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047
171
1 APPEARANCES CONTI NUED:
2 LAW OFFI CES OF KUBI CKI , DRAPER, by PETER H. MURPHY, Esqui r e, and
3 WI LLI AM BI SSETT, Esqui r e, At t or neys f or Def endant s.
4 THE MCGRANE LAW FI RM, by
5 MI LES A. MCGRANE, Esqui r e, At t or ney f or J ack Davi s.
6ALSO PRESENT: Yasmi ne Davi s
7 J ef f r ey Davi s, Esq. J ack Davi s.
8
I NDEX9
10 WI TNESS CROSS REDI RECT RECROSS
11 Det ect i ve Nye- Gonzal ez
12 ( By Mr . Murphy) 216( By Mr . Dur kee) 172 ( Cont i nued) 221
13
14 WI TNESS DI RECT CROSS REDI RECT
15 Dr . J ul i an Munoz- Di az16 ( By Mr . Dur kee) 228
( By Mr . Murphy) 23717
18 WI TNESS DI RECT CROSS REDI RECT
19 Dr . Ronal d Wr i ght
20 ( By Mr . Durkee) 242 276( By Mr . Murphy) 255
21
WI TNESS DI RECT CROSS REDI RECT22
Wayne Wi l l i ams23
( By Mr . Durkee) 284 29524 ( By Mr . Murphy) 293
25
-
8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz
3/153
Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014
Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460
www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047
172
1 THE COURT: Thank you ever yone.
2 MR. DURKEE: May I proceed, Your Honor ?
3 THE COURT: Yes.
4 Ther eupon:
5 DETECTI VE NYE- GONZALEZ
6 r esumed.
7 CROSS EXAMI NATI ON CONTI NUED
8 BY MR. DURKEE:
9 Q. Good af t er noon, Det ect i ve.
10 A. Good af t ernoon.
11 Q. Fi r st of al l , t o go back j ust f or a
12 moment , I j ust want t o make sur e we ar e cl ear
13 because we ki nd of got caught up wi t h what t he exact
14 l anguage was, but at t he t i me t hat you, quot e,
15 "suspect ed t hat no cr i me has been commi t t ed" maybe
16 i n t he f i r st hour or t wo of your i nvest i gat i on, t he
17 onl y evi dence you had was J asmi ne' s st at ement ,
18 correct?
19 A. No.
20 Q. What el se di d you have?
21 A. Wel l , I t al ked t o t he of f i cer s. I had
22 been t hr ough t he back of t he resi dence, sever al
23 t hi ngs had t r anspi r ed.
24 Q. But what speci f i cal l y wer e you r el yi ng on
25 t o f or m a concl usi on wi t hi n t he f i r st hour or t wo
-
8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz
4/153
Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014
Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460
www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047
173
1 t hat , quot e, "you suspect ed t hat no cr i me had been
2 commi t t ed, " ot her t han t he st at ement t hat we tal ked
3 about because I want t o l i st t hem speci f i cal l y, not
4 j ust wal ki ng ar ound t he pr emi ses?
5 When you wal ked ar ound t he pr emi ses, what
6 evi dence di d you per cei ve or see t hat l ed you t o
7 t hi s concl usi on t hat you suspect ed t hat no cr i me had
8 been commi t t ed?
9 A. Wel l , I was t her e t o conduct a deat h
10 i nvest i gat i on and t hat ' s what I was doi ng. I spoke
11 wi t h t he of f i cer who had al r eady spoken t o Ms.
12 Davi s, t ook t hat i nt o consi der at i on. What I had
13 was, at t hat poi nt what I t hought was an armed
14 bur gl ar y and a f ami l y def endi ng themsel ves.
15 Q. Ri ght . So t he onl y t hi ng you had at t hat
16 poi nt was J asmi ne' s st at ement , cor r ect ?
17 A. Wel l , l i ke I sai d, I wal ked t hr ough. I
18 had been t o t he back. I was absor bi ng al l of t he
19 i nf or mat i on t hat I was t ol d at t hat t i me. So I
20 don' t know i f I can l i st t hi ng by t hi ng. I ' m
21 absor bi ng i nf or mat i on. I am l ooki ng ar ound. I am
22 hear i ng. I am t al ki ng.
23 Q. Wel l , ot her t han absor bi ng t hi ngs by
24 osmosi s, but i f you woul d f or t he Cour t , pl ease l i st
25 any - - and you can l i st anyt hi ng. I don' t car e i f
-
8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz
5/153
Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014
Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460
www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047
174
1 you l i st t hem al l or one or t wo, but I know we
2 t al ked about J asmi ne' s st at ement , what el se wer e you
3 r el yi ng on? Can you t el l t hi s Cour t anyt hi ng el se
4 speci f i cal l y t hat you wer e r el yi ng on t o come up
5 wi t h t he concl usi on t hat , quot e, unquot e, "You
6 suspect ed t hat no cr i me had been commi t t ed"?
7 A. Then I guess we are goi ng t o have t o go
8 t hr ough my repor t and I can t el l you t he t hi ngs I
9 di d and t he st eps t hat I t ook. I ' m not sur e t her e
10 i s anot her way.
11 Q. Okay.
12 A. Okay? So i ni t i al l y I get a phone cal l , or
13 I am t ol d by anot her det ect i ve who r ecei ved a phone
14 cal l what we wer e r espondi ng t o. So I absor bed
15 t hat . I don' t t hi nk i t was by osmosi s, but I
16 absor bed t hat .
17 Q. What about t hat f i r st conver sat i on or
18 f i r st i nf or mat i on t hat you der i ved f r om t hat t hat
19 you r el i ed on t o come up wi t h a concl usi on t hat ,
20 quot e, unquot e, "You suspect ed t hat no cr i me had
21 been commi t t ed"?
22 A. Wel l , I was t ol d t hat a mal e was st eal i ng
23 a wave runner f r om t he resi dence and was shot by t he
24 homeowner . Lat er - -
25 Q. So t hat st at ement t her e t hat i s somet hi ng
-
8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz
6/153
Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014
Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460
www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047
175
1 you r el i ed on?
2 A. Wel l , of cour se, Mr . Dur kee.
3 Q. Okay. That ' s one st at ement .
4 A. Ever yt hi ng t hat I di d, al l t he t hi ngs t hat
5 I hear d, ever yone t hat I t al ked t o, anyt hi ng t hat I
6 saw, I r el i ed upon.
7 Q. Of cour se.
8 A. And I st i l l r el y upon t oday.
9 Q. Of cour se. And t hat ' s what I ' m t r yi ng t o
10 f i gur e out . You sai d wi t hi n t he f i r st - -
11 A. No, I di dn' t say wi t hi n t he f i r st
12 anyt hi ng. You ar e t he one t hat sai d wi t hi n t he
13 f i r st . Now you gi ve a t i me sl ot . When I ar r i ved, I
14 was conduct i ng a deat h i nvest i gat i on. That ' s what I
15 was doi ng.
16 Q. Ma' am, I am not t r yi ng t o bi cker wi t h you.
17 What I am t r yi ng t o say i s you t ol d me - - I t hi nk
18 t hat i s how i t pl ayed out . I sai d t hat when he l ef t
19 t he pr emi ses, J ack l ef t t he pr emi ses wi t h hi s
20 f at her , whi ch I t hi nk we' ve est abl i shed was wi t hi n
21 t he f i r st hour or so of t he i nvest i gat i on, you t ol d
22 t hi s Cour t t hat at t hat t i me when he l ef t t he
23 pr emi ses, you di dn' t t hi nk i t was t hat bi g of a deal
24 because he was a wi t ness at t hat poi nt , he wasn' t a
25 suspect .
-
8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz
7/153
Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014
Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460
www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047
176
1 A. Wel l , l et ' s st op r i ght t her e because I
2 di dn' t know t hat he l ef t unt i l af t er he l ef t and
3 came back. So I di dn' t know t hat . So I di dn' t make
4 any det er mi nat i ons at t hat t i me.
5 Q. I ' m not t r yi ng t o put wor ds i n your mout h.
6 We can go back t o t he t r anscr i pt because I marked
7 i t . You were t he one who vol unt eered t o me. I
8 di dn' t cr eat e t hi s . I di dn' t tal k about thi s . I
9 sai d, "When he l ef t t he scene, he was a wi t ness t o a
10 cr i me, " and you sai d t o us, "No, I don' t t hi nk he
11 was a wi t ness or a suspect or anyt hi ng el se because
12 at t hat t i me I di dn' t suspect t hat any cr i me had
13 been commi t t ed. "
14 That i s what you sai d. So what I am
15 t r yi ng t o f i nd out i s when he l ef t t he cr i me scene
16 wi t h hi s f at her , unaccompani ed by any pol i ce
17 of f i cer s, and you had f or med t hat bel i ef i n your
18 head, not me, t hat you had suspect ed t hat no cr i me
19 had been commi t t ed, what I am t r yi ng t o f i gur e out
20 i s what ar e t he pi eces of evi dence t hat you wer e
21 r el yi ng on t o f or m t hat concl usi on so ear l y i n t he
22 case?
23 I mean, you under st and how an
24 i nvest i gat i on goes. You go out and you gat her
25 evi dence. You gat her al l of t he evi dence and t hen
-
8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz
8/153
Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014
Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460
www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047
177
1 f or m concl usi ons. You have done t hat i n f r ont of
2 t he Cour t and you have done t hat t oday.
3 You were t he one t hat t ol d us t hat when he
4 l ef t t he pr emi ses, t hat he was a wi t ness or a
5 suspect because you had sai d, quot e, unquot e, "You
6 suspect ed t hat no cr i me had been commi t t ed. "
7 So now I ' m t r yi ng t o f i nd out , at t hat
8 t i me you made t hat concl usi on, what evi dence - - and
9 you under st and evi dence, r i ght ?
10 A. Excuse me?
11 Q. Do you under st and evi dence?
12 A. Do I underst and evi dence?
13 Q. Do you under st and t hat you' r e supposed t o
14 gat her evi dence dur i ng an i nvest i gat i on?
15 A. I bel i eve I do, Mr . Dur kee.
16 Q. So I t hi nk i t ' s a si mpl e quest i on. When
17 you made t hat concl usi on t hat you had suspect ed t hat
18 no cr i me had been commi t t ed, what evi dence wer e you
19 r el yi ng on t o make t hat concl usi on?
20 A. What I was r el yi ng on was t he i nf or mat i on
21 I had r ecei ved f r om t he ot her of f i cer s, f r om t he
22 ot her - - al l t he ot her of f i cer s on t he scene, f r om
23 t he st at ement t hat was gi ven t o t he ot her of f i cer
24 whi ch was t hen t r ansl at ed t o me, what I saw when I
25 wal ked ar ound t he pr emi ses. That ' s what I was
-
8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz
9/153
Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014
Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460
www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047
178
1 r el yi ng on.
2 Q. Let ' s t ake each one of t hose t hi ngs. The
3 st at ement s t hat had been pr ovi ded t o you up unt i l
4 t hat poi nt by t he ot her of f i cer s r eal l y was t hat
5 J asmi ne had gi ven a st at ement and t hat was
6 communi cat ed t o you, cor r ect ?
7 A. That ' s one of t he t hi ngs, Yes.
8 Q. You had not r evi ewed t he 911 t ape at t hat
9 poi nt , cor r ect ?
10 A. I don' t know what poi nt I r evi ewed i t . I
11 can l ook at my not es and see, but I di d r evi ew t he
12 911 t ape.
13 Q. Ri ght , t hat was l at er on.
14 A. Do you want me t o l ook at t hat ?
15 Q. That was l at er on. That was at 5: 55 p. m.
16 I t ' s on Page 6.
17 But somet i me bef or e t hat i s when t he f ol ks
18 came back and you conf r ont ed Mr . Davi s about t he
19 f act t hat you guys had suspect ed t hat hi s son was
20 t he shoot er . That ' s on Page 4.
21 A. Okay.
22 Q. So i f you l ook at i t chr onol ogi cal l y, you
23 di dn' t r evi ew t he 911 t ape at t hat poi nt . What I am
24 sayi ng i s, ot her t han t al ki ng t o Of f i cer - - because
25 you di d wr i t e t hi s chr onol ogi cal l y. I mean, i t
-
8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz
10/153
Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014
Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460
www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047
179
1 seems l i ke chr onol ogi cal l y by t he t i me you
2 conf r ont ed J ef f r ey Davi s and hi s son, t hat you
3 suspect ed t hat hi s son had been t he shoot er . The
4 onl y t hi ng t hat you r eal l y had done i s t al k t o
5 Of f i cer Zabi el i nsky and t aken t he cal l back at t he
6 of f i ce t hat t here was a r obbery and somebody got
7 shot ?
8 A. Wel l , Mr . Dur kee, i f you want t o r ead on
9 Page 4, i t says Ser geant Mal ot t i s t he one t hat
10 advi sed Mr . Davi s t hat t her e was a suspi ci on t hat
11 J ack was t he one who shot t he f i r ear m. I di dn' t
12 advi se hi m.
13 Q. Yes, but he had al r eady gone of f t he
14 pr emi ses at t hat poi nt , cor r ect ?
15 A. I bel i eve so.
16 Q. Ri ght .
17 A. I t was acci dent al l y omi t t ed f r om my
18 r epor t . I don' t see i t her e. So I don' t know t he
19 t i me and Sergeant Mal ot t woul d have t o answer t o t he
20 t i mes.
21 Q. Ri ght , because i t ' s not ment i oned anywher e
22 i n your i nvest i gat i ve r epor t t hat you al l owed t he
23 shoot er t o go of f t he pr emi ses wi t h hi s f at her , a
24 l awyer , and get consul t ed and came back t o t he
25 pr emi ses. That ' s nowher e i n your r epor t , r i ght ?
-
8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz
11/153
Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014
Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460
www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047
180
1 A. I t i s not i n my r epor t , but J ack and hi s
2 f at her l ef t t he scene. I t ' s not i n my r epor t . That
3 i s cor r ect . I t was acci dent al l y omi t t ed. I di dn' t
4 al l ow anyone t o do t hat .
5 Q. So I am cor r ect t o say at t hat poi nt t her e
6 was no physi cal evi dence t hat you gat hered t hat you
7 r el i ed on, cor r ect ?
8 A. Mr . Dur kee, I ' m havi ng a di f f i cul t t i me
9 under st andi ng what i t i s t hat you' r e t r yi ng t o get
10 f r om me. I t ol d you t hat I was di spat ched t her e. I
11 went t her e. I am conduct i ng a deat h i nvest i gat i on.
12 I di dn' t - - I di dn' t al l ow J ack t o l eave. I can' t
13 answer t o t hat .
14 Q. Ri ght , but you wer e t he l ead i nvest i gat or ,
15 correct?
16 A. Under my super vi sor , Ser geant Mal ot t , t hat
17 i s cor r ect .
18 Q. And ver y ear l y i n t he case, ver y ear l y i n
19 t he case you as t he l ead i nvest i gat or had come t o
20 t he concl usi on t hat you t ol d us her e i n Cour t t hat
21 you, quot e, unquot e, "suspect ed t hat no cr i me had
22 been commi t t ed"?
23 A. That ' s cor r ect .
24 Q. What I am t r yi ng t o f i nd out , and I t hi nk
25 i t ' s a l egi t i mat e i nqui r y, i s ot her t han t he
-
8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz
12/153
Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014
Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460
www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047
181
1 st at ement by J asmi ne Davi s t o Of f i cer Zabi el i nsky,
2 what ot her obj ect i ve evi dence wer e you r el yi ng on t o
3 make t hat concl usi on? Ot her t han wal ki ng around t he
4 scene and seei ng a body t hat ' s on t he gr ound, ot her
5 t han wal ki ng around t he scene and seei ng a wave
6 r unner , ot her t han wal ki ng ar ound t he scene and
7 seei ng a shot gun on t he t abl e, ot her t han wal ki ng
8 ar ound t he scene seei ng J asmi ne si t t i ng out i n t he
9 backyar d, ot her t han wal ki ng t he scene and seei ng
10 pol i ce t ape, ot her t han wal ki ng ar ound and seei ng
11 ot her pol i ce of f i cer s wal ki ng ar ound, i n your mi nd
12 what were t he i t ems of evi dence t hat you were
13 r el yi ng on t o come up wi t h t he concl usi on t hat you
14 suspect ed t hat no cr i me had been commi t t ed ear l y on
15 i n t hi s i nvesti gat i on?
16 A. As I ' ve t ol d you bef or e, al l of t he
17 i nf or mat i on t hat I had up unt i l t hat poi nt .
18 Q. Wher e shoul d I cut t hat cut of f on your
19 r epor t ? When you say, "up t o t hat poi nt , " wher e do
20 I f i nd t hat ?
21 A. I don' t know. You' r e t he one who i s
22 det er mi ni ng t her e i s a poi nt . I ' m not sur e. You' r e
23 det er mi ni ng t her e i s a poi nt . You sai d t her e was an
24 hour or t wo hour s. I ' m not r eal l y sur e. I ' m not
25 r eal l y sur e what you' r e - - t hat t her e was a t i me
-
8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz
13/153
Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014
Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460
www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047
182
1 mar ker . I r esponded t o t hi s scene t o conduct a
2 deat h i nvest i gat i on and t hat ' s what I di d.
3 Q. You ar e supposed t o f ol l ow t he evi dence,
4 r i ght ?
5 A. I conduct ed a deat h i nvest i gat i on.
6 Q. Wai t a mi nut e. I ' m aski ng you a quest i on.
7 A. Of cour se we f ol l ow t he evi dence.
8 Q. Now, you t ol d me t hat J ef f r ey Davi s and
9 hi s son had gone of f t he pr emi ses and t hen when t hey
10 came back, t hat ' s when you or , bet t er , Ser geant
11 Mal ot t had conf r ont ed J ef f r ey and J ack wi t h t he
12 i nf or mat i on t hat you suspect ed J ack was t he shoot er ,
13 cor r ect ? We' ve est abl i shed t hat , r i ght ?
14 A. That we suspect ed, yes, t hat i s cor r ect .
15 Q. So I t hi nk we now have a t i me st amp. We
16 know t hat when you conf r ont ed J ef f r ey and J ack wi t h
17 your suspi ci ons, t hey had al r eady been of f t he
18 pr emi ses, cor r ect ?
19 A. I bel i eve so, yes.
20 Q. And I t hi nk on your r epor t we have t hat at
21 about - - somet i me bet ween 4: 45 and 4: 50 when t he
22 medi a r el at i ons peopl e showed up, r i ght ? Accor di ng
23 t o your chr onol ogy i n your r epor t , cor r ect ?
24 A. That i s cor r ect .
25 Q. So you ar r i ved on t he scene at 4: 00,
-
8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz
14/153
Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014
Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460
www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047
183
1 correct?
2 A. That i s cor r ect .
3 Q. And af t er you ar r i ve on t he scene - - f i r st
4 of al l , you had got t en a cal l t o advi se you what was
5 goi ng on and t o go t o t he scene. That was somet hi ng
6 t hat happened wi t h you. And t hen you t al ked t o
7 Of f i cer Zabi el i nsky and he t ol d you what J asmi ne had
8 t ol d hi m. Ther e was f i r e r escue on t he scene. You
9 not ed t hat . You had gone and conduct ed a
10 wal k- t hr ough of t he r ear of t he r esi dence. You
11 i nt r oduce your sel f t o J asmi ne.
12 And t hen event ual l y, af t er 4: 45 but bef or e
13 4: 50, you guys conf r ont ed Mr . Davi s and J ack t hat
14 you f el t t hat he had been t he shoot er . I s t hat
15 r i ght ?
16 A. That ' s r i ght .
17 Q. So t hat was t he ext ent of your
18 i nvest i gat i on up t o t hat poi nt , r i ght ?
19 A. Up t o t hat poi nt , yes.
20 Q. Now, once Mr . Davi s was conf r ont ed wi t h
21 t hi s i nf or mat i on, he t ol d you t hat f r om t hat poi nt
22 f or war d, hi s cr i mi nal l awyer , Ms. Rat zan, woul d
23 speak f or t he f ami l y, cor r ect ?
24 A. He di dn' t t el l me. He t ol d Ser geant
25 Mal ot t t hat Ms. Rat zan wi l l be r epr esent i ng and
-
8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz
15/153
Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014
Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460
www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047
184
1 speaki ng on t hei r behal f .
2 Q. I n your ver nacul ar , t hat ' s basi cal l y
3 cal l ed l awyer i ng i t up, r i ght ?
4 A. I guess you coul d say t hat .
5 Q. Have you hear d t hat t er m bef or e?
6 A. I have.
7 Q. And t hat ' s when a cr i mi nal def endant says,
8 "I ' m not t al ki ng t o you any f ur t her . I want t o t al k
9 t o my l awyer , " r i ght ? That ' s what i t means by
10 l awyer i ng i t up, r i ght ?
11 A. I guess you coul d gi ve i t t hat connot at i on
12 or you coul d j ust say, " I have a l awyer who i s goi ng
13 t o be r epr esent i ng me. " Peopl e get l awyer s al l t he
14 t i me.
15 Q. Af t er Mr . Davi s, who i s a l awyer , t ol d you
16 t hat , you knew you coul d not i nt er vi ew J asmi ne or
17 J ack unt i l t he l awyer got t here and you had t o t al k
18 t hr ough t he l awyer . I s t hat r i ght ?
19 A. That i s cor r ect . She was goi ng t o be
20 maki ng a st at ement .
21 Q. Now, at t hat poi nt you had Ms. Davi s' s
22 st at ement t hat she f i r ed a weapon, and you had
23 r easonabl e suspi ci on t o bel i eve based on t he wound
24 t o J ack' s f ace, and maybe some ot her col l at er al
25 evi dence, t hat J ack was i n f act t he shoot er . So you
-
8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz
16/153
Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014
Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460
www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047
185
1 had t wo possi bl e scenar i os. You had t he f act t hat
2 J asmi ne may have shot , Mr s. Davi s, or you had t hi s
3 mi nor chi l d, J ack, who coul d have f i r ed t he weapon.
4 You had t wo conf l i ct i ng ver si ons at t hat poi nt . You
5 suspect ed J ack, but you al so had t hi s ver bal
6 st at ement t hat J asmi ne had f i r ed t he weapon.
7 So at t hat poi nt t her e ar e t est s t o
8 det er mi ne def i ni t el y i f somebody shot a weapon. I s
9 that true?
10 A. Not def i ni t el y, but t her e ar e gunshot
11 r esi due t est s t hat can be admi ni st er ed, yes.
12 Q. And t hat ' s somet hi ng t hat ' s r egul ar cour se
13 of busi ness, i f you want t o det er mi ne - - t hat i s t he
14 t est t hat you t r y and admi ni st er t o t r y t o det er mi ne
15 who shot t he weapon, cor r ect ?
16 A. That i s one of t he t est s, yes.
17 Q. And you never di d t hat i n t hi s case,
18 r i ght ?
19 A. A gunshot r esi due t est was not conduct ed,
20 no.
21 Q. And as t he l ead det ect i ve, i f you want ed
22 t o f i ght f or a gun r esi due t est , you coul d have
23 f ought f or t hat , cor r ect ?
24 A. Wel l , I had an Assi st ant St at e At t or ney
25 t here and we di scussed i t and we deci ded t hat i t was
-
8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz
17/153
Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014
Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460
www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047
186
1 not goi ng t o happen.
2 Q. Di d you f eel t hat was t he appr opr i at e
3 t hi ng t o do, not t o do a gunshot r esi due t est ? Was
4 t hat your deci si on or di d you j ust def er t o t he
5 St at e At t or ney?
6 A. I t hi nk i t was mor e of a gr oup deci si on
7 and t he Davi s f ami l y decl i ned and we accept ed t hat
8 we ar en' t goi ng t o do gunshot r esi due.
9 Q. I t wasn' t t hat you t ot al l y di d not
10 consi der i t , t he f ami l y actual l y r ef used t o do i t ?
11 A. They decl i ned, yes.
12 Q. Who decl i ned t hat on behal f of t he f ami l y,
13 wasn' t t hat J ef f Davi s?
14 A. I wi l l have t o l ook at my not es.
15 Q. Anyway, t hey r ef used, cor r ect ?
16 A. Yes.
17 Q. Now, al so you were operat i ng under t he
18 bel i ef based on t hi s st at ement t hat you had der i ved
19 f r om Of f i cer Zabi el i nsky t hat J asmi ne Davi s had
20 pr of f er ed t o hi m t hat t her e was a gun i nvol ved,
21 correct?
22 A. I ' m sor r y, you wi l l have t o say t hat
23 agai n.
24 Q. Based on t he st at ement t hat you had
25 gat her ed f r om Of f i cer Zabi el i nsky t hat came f r om
-
8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz
18/153
Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014
Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460
www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047
187
1 J asmi ne Davi s, you bel i eved t hat t he person t hat was
2 t her e t r yi ng t o st eal t he wave runner possi bl y had a
3 gun. I s t hat t r ue?
4 A. Yes.
5 Q. And, i n f act , you r equest ed pol i ce di ver s
6 t o t he scene, I t hi nk i t was about 4: 55, about an
7 hour af t er you got t her e t o st ar t l ooki ng f or a gun,
8 correct?
9 A. That i s cor r ect . They wer e cal l ed.
10 Q. And t he r eason you' r e l ooki ng f or a gun
11 t hat Mr . Reynal do Munoz, J r . may or may not have had
12 i s t hat woul d have been a ver y i mpor t ant pi ece of
13 evi dence. I f t he f ami l y i s sayi ng I shot t hi s
14 f el l ow because he had a gun, you obvi ousl y want ed t o
15 t r y and f i nd t hat gun t o see whet her you coul d
16 suppor t t hei r st or y or not , cor r ect ?
17 A. Yes, we want ed t o f i nd i t i f we coul d f i nd
18 i t , yeah.
19 Q. You never f ound i t , di d you?
20 A. No, we di d not f i nd a gun.
21 Q. I n f act , when t he st at ement was pr of f er ed
22 t hr ough t he at t or ney, t her e was no pr of f er t hat t he
23 gun may be i nsi de of t he f r ont compar t ment . I s t hat
24 true?
25 A. I woul d have t o l ook back at t he
-
8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz
19/153
Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014
Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460
www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047
188
1 st at ement . I ' m not sur e. I can l ook at i t , t hough.
2 No, t hat i s not i n t he i ni t i al st at ement
3 f r om At t or ney Rat zan.
4 Q. So at t hat poi nt , nobody r eal l y t ol d you
5 t o l ook i n t he f r ont compar t ment f or a gun, cor r ect ?
6 A. At t hat poi nt , no.
7 Q. At t hi s poi nt , based on your anal ysi s of
8 t he evi dence and wi t h your exper i ence, you woul d
9 agr ee wi t h me t hat mor e l i kel y t han not he never had
10 a gun and i t was r eal l y, i f anyt hi ng, t hi s r ecei ver
11 devi ce t hat she may have per cei ved t o be a gun. I s
12 t hat r i ght ?
13 A. I bel i eve t hat now, yes.
14 Q. Now t hat we ar e on t he pr of f er , t he
15 pr of f er t hat was made and t hat was supposedl y comi ng
16 f r om J asmi ne Davi s was t he f ol l owi ng, t hat she was
17 i nsi de of t he r esi dence wi t h her chi l dr en. She
18 obser ved a man near a st orage cl oset i n t he r ear of
19 her r esi dence. She approached t he man and began
20 yel l i ng as she cal l ed 911. I s t hat r i ght ?
21 A. That ' s cor r ect so f ar .
22 Q. At t hat t i me, she t ol d J ack, her son, t o
23 get t he gun whi ch i s kept under t he mast er bed,
24 r i ght ? So f ar so good?
25 A. So f ar so good. You' r e r eadi ng i t .
-
8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz
20/153
Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014
Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460
www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047
189
1 Q. J asmi ne t hen t ol d t he man t hat she had a
2 gun and i n response t he man sai d he had a gun, t oo.
3 When J ack came out si de wi t h t he gun, he
4 shot t he man. J asmi ne admi t t ed t hat she or i gi nal l y
5 l i ed about i t and at t hi s t i me - - I ' m not r eadi ng i t
6 pr eci sel y, but event ual l y she al so t ol d you at t hi s
7 t i me t her e was possi bl y anot her - - a second man on a
8 wave r unner ci r cl i ng t he ar ea, cor r ect ?
9 A. You' r e r eadi ng i t . You' r e l eavi ng out
10 some par t s but , yeah, you' r e r eadi ng i t . That ' s
11 exact l y what i t says.
12 Q. I n t hat pr of f er she never t ol d t he pol i ce
13 t hat she t hought t he man was dr oppi ng of f a boat ,
14 correct?
15 A. You j ust r ead i t . Nope, i t doesn' t say
16 anyt hi ng about t hat .
17 Q. And you agr ee wi t h me t hat , i f anyt hi ng,
18 her f ear der i ved f r om t he f act t hat t he guy sai d he
19 had a gun, t oo, cor r ect ?
20 A. No, I woul dn' t agr ee wi t h you on t hat .
21 Q. I n t hat pr of f er does she ever say she saw
22 a gun?
23 A. I don' t bel i eve i t says t hat , no.
24 Q. And we t al ked about i t , she never st at ed
25 i n t hat pr of f er t hat t he per cei ved gun was i nsi de of
-
8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz
21/153
Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014
Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460
www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047
190
1 t he f r ont compar t ment , cor r ect ? We al r eady t al ked
2 about t hat .
3 A. Agai n, Mr . Dur kee, you r ead i t and i t
4 di dn' t say anyt hi ng about t hat .
5 Q. Ma' am, I am not t r yi ng t o aggr avat e you.
6 You sound l i ke you' r e get t i ng aggr avat ed. I am j ust
7 t r yi ng t o do my j ob j ust l i ke you' r e t r yi ng t o do
8 your j ob, okay?
9 A. I ' m j ust r ef er r i ng back t o t he f act t hat
10 you r ead i t and - -
11 Q. You don' t need t o be smar t wi t h me. I am
12 j ust t r yi ng t o do my j ob, okay?
13 A. Okay. So am I .
14 Q. Exact l y.
15 At t hat t i me, At t or ney Rat zan al so advi sed
16 you t hat t he f ami l y was not goi ng t o cooper at e any
17 f ur t her because, A, t hey wer e t o di st r aught t o be
18 i nt er vi ewed and, B, t hey needed t o st udy f or f i nal s,
19 r i ght ?
20 A. She sai d t hat t he f ami l y i s t o di st r aught
21 t o be i nt er vi ewed at t hat t i me and t he chi l dr en wer e
22 pr epar i ng f or t hei r f i nal s, t hus we agr eed t o meet
23 at a l at er dat e.
24 Q. And, i n f act , t he f ami l y and At t or ney
25 Rat zan had agr eed t o meet wi t h you t he f ol l owi ng
-
8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz
22/153
Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014
Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460
www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047
191
1 Monday, whi ch woul d have been t wo days af t er t he
2 shoot i ng, t o come down and gi ve t hei r st at ement s,
3 correct?
4 A. That was t he dat e on t he 23r d, yes.
5 Q. That was t he pl an, r i ght ?
6 A. Yes, t hat was t he pl an.
7 Q. But t hat pl an di dn' t get ef f ect uat ed
8 because t hey never showed up, r i ght ?
9 A. I t was cancel ed. I bel i eve t hey spoke
10 wi t h Ser geant Mal ot t and i t was cancel ed.
11 Q. I n f act , you never t ook Mr s. Davi s' s
12 st at ement unt i l mont hs l at er . I s t hat cor r ect ?
13 A. That ' s cor r ect .
14 Q. And you di dn' t t ake J ack Davi s' s st at ement
15 unt i l November , whi ch was si x mont hs af t er t he
16 i nci dent , cor r ect ?
17 A. That ' s cor r ect .
18 Q. And one of t he r easons you di dn' t - - I
19 t hi nk you sai d on di r ect , one of t he reasons you
20 di dn' t push t o have J ack gi ve a st at ement was
21 because t he ki ds had f i nal s and you had t o make
22 accommodat i ons, r i ght ?
23 A. I don' t r ecal l sayi ng t hat .
24 Q. Do you r emember back i n your deposi t i on
25 you sai d t he t wo ki ds had f i nal s and t he f ami l y was
-
8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz
23/153
Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014
Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460
www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047
192
1 di st r aught or somet hi ng l i ke t hat ?
2 A. Okay, yes. That ' s what i t says her e.
3 That ' s why we di dn' t i nt er vi ew t hem t hat day.
4 Q. So you were del ayi ng your homi ci de
5 i nvest i gat i on t o t ake t he st at ement of t he per son
6 who f i r ed t he weapon because t hese ki ds had t o t ake
7 some t est s?
8 A. I wasn' t del ayi ng a deat h i nvest i gat i on.
9 I t di dn' t del ay t he i nvest i gat i on. I nvest i gat i ons
10 t ake a ver y l ong t i me. Thi s happens al l of t he
11 t i me. Thi ngs don' t happen day af t er day af t er day.
12 Somet i mes t her e i s a del ay. I t ' s a deat h
13 i nvest i gat i on.
14 Q. On a homi ci de i nvest i gat i on f or a per son
15 who l i ves her e i n Mi ami , i s not out of t own, who i s
16 avai l abl e 24/ 7, i t ' s t ypi cal t o wai t si x mont hs t o
17 go and t r y t o i nt er vi ew t he al l eged shoot er ?
18 A. I t ' s t ypi cal t hat somet i mes t hat happens
19 t hat we don' t i nt er vi ew t hem r i ght away, yes.
20 Q. What was t he compel l i ng necessi t y other
21 t han school t est s t o wai t si x mont hs bef or e you
22 t r i ed t o t ake hi s st at ement ?
23 A. That ' s when i t wor ked out , Mr . Dur kee. We
24 spoke. Ther e wer e ot her dat es. The f i r st dat e was
25 cancel ed. I ' m not sur e i f we t r i ed t o r eschedul e.
-
8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz
24/153
Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014
Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460
www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047
193
1 I was speaki ng wi t h the at t or neys and t hose wer e t he
2 dat es we ended up wi t h. I had sever al ot her cases.
3 Ot her t hi ngs were happeni ng.
4 Q. Now, anot her t hi ng you coul d have done at
5 t he t i me of t he - - t he day of t he i nvest i gat i on, t he
6 day of t he shoot i ng, was t o t ake possessi on of t he
7 wave r unner whi ch was r eal l y par t of t hi s whol e
8 scenar i o, cor r ect ?
9 A. We coul d have done t hat , yes.
10 Q. You coul d have i mpounded i t , r i ght ?
11 A. We coul d have, yes.
12 Q. And you di dn' t do t hat ?
13 A. No, we deci ded not t o.
14 Q. And t hat ' s because you di dn' t f eel l i ke i t
15 had any evi dent i ar y val ue at t hat poi nt , cor r ect ? I
16 mean, evi dence i s kept i n a ver y st r i ct chai n of
17 cust ody, et cet er a, et cet er a. At t hat poi nt you
18 must have di scount ed t he wave r unner as havi ng any
19 evi dent i ar y val ue, cor r ect ?
20 A. No, we phot ogr aphed i t and pr ocessed i t t o
21 t he best of our abi l i t y and al l of t he per t i nent
22 t hi ngs t hat we t hought we needed f r om i t and we
23 deci ded not t o i mpound i t .
24 Q. Now, event ual l y sever al weeks l at er , t hey
25 f ound t hi s bl ack devi ce i nsi de t he gut s of t he wave
-
8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz
25/153
Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014
Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460
www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047
194
1 r unner , r i ght ?
2 A. That ' s cor r ect .
3 Q. And t hey f ound t hat t he f r ont compar t ment
4 door had been br oken down or r i pped of f . I t hi nk
5 t hat was t he phr ase t hey used, r i pped of f .
6 A. I ' m not sur e about t he phr ase. I t had
7 been t amper ed wi t h.
8 Q. And once t hat was brought t o your
9 at t ent i on by Mr . Davi s, you went t o hi s of f i ce and
10 secur ed t he bl ack devi ce f i r st , r i ght ?
11 A. I woul d have t o l ook at my chai n of
12 event s, but i f t hat ' s what you say, I went t her e
13 f i r st , okay. I know I r et r i eved t he box f r om hi m
14 and t hen subsequent l y I i nt er vi ewed t he gent l eman
15 who f ound i t at t he J et Ski shop.
16 Q. And t hen you went t o t he J et Ski shop and
17 you t ook a ser i es of phot ogr aphs wi t h t he f r ont
18 compar t ment open and you document ed t he f act t hat
19 t he back panel had been r i pped of f and you
20 document ed t hese devi ces wi t h t hei r f emal e and mal e
21 r ecept acl es of how i t wor ked. I s t hat r i ght ?
22 A. The cr i me scene det ect i ve i s t he one who
23 t akes pi ct ur es and wr i t es t he r epor t s on t hat , but I
24 was t her e and I observed i t .
25 Q. Ri ght , t hat was somet hi ng t hat was par t of
-
8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz
26/153
Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014
Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460
www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047
195
1 your i nvest i gat i on as t he l ead det ect i ve?
2 A. Ri ght , I obser ved t hat .
3 Q. And t hat was t he f i r st t i me any of t hat
4 had been document ed as f ar as bl ack boxes, t he
5 r ecept or s i nsi de t he wave r unner , t he panel bei ng
6 br oken of f , and ever yt hi ng el se, cor r ect ?
7 A. I don' t t hi nk i t was obvi ous t hat t he
8 panel had been br oken when we f i r st t ook
9 phot ogr aphs, but at t hat poi nt , yes, i t was obvi ous,
10 you know, we saw t he bl ack box and t hat t he panel
11 had been t ampered wi t h.
12 Q. You t hought t hat was i mpor t ant t o document
13 t hat , r i ght , because t hat ' s why you went out t o t he
14 wave runner shop and phot ogr aphed i t wi t h cr i me
15 scene i nvest i gat or s, r i ght ?
16 A. Yes.
17 Q. Now, pr i or t o t he bl ack box bei ng f ound
18 and, you know, i t ' s chr onol ogi cal i n your r epor t ,
19 you conduct ed a canvas of t he ar ea, i s t hat r i ght ,
20 of t he home wher e t he shoot i ng occur r ed, r i ght ?
21 A. Can you t el l me whi ch page we ar e on?
22 Q. I t i s on Page 18.
23 A. So you' r e r ef er r i ng t o May 24t h?
24 Q. That i s cor r ect .
25 A. The area canvas, yes.
-
8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz
27/153
Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014
Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460
www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047
196
1 Q. And t hen i f you l ook at t he second page on
2 t hat same day, at appr oxi mat el y 11: 00 a. m. , you made
3 cont act wi t h Mr . Davi s i n f r ont of hi s r esi dence,
4 correct?
5 A. That ' s cor r ect .
6 Q. And he br ought you i nt o hi s backyard and
7 showed you t hat t here was a l anyar d at t ached t o hi s
8 wave r unner t hat was not hi s, r i ght ?
9 A. That ' s cor r ect .
10 Q. That l anyar d had not been r et r i eved by you
11 or your i nvest i gat i ve t eam on t he day of t he
12 shoot i ng, cor r ect ?
13 A. That ' s cor r ect .
14 Q. And t hat was a f or ei gn l anyar d and
15 Mr . Davi s act ual l y t ook you ar ound t he back of t he
16 house and made sure you preser ved i t as evi dence,
17 r i ght ?
18 A. Ri ght , but we di dn' t know i t was f or ei gn
19 unt i l t hen. We di dn' t know i t was f or ei gn at t hat
20 t i me.
21 Q. Ri ght , Mr . Davi s was t he one t hat br ought
22 t hat t o your at t ent i on on t hi s dat e a f ew days l at er
23 on May 24t h, r i ght ?
24 A. That i s cor r ect .
25 Q. Now, at t hat t i me, di d Mr . Davi s ever t el l
-
8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz
28/153
Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014
Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460
www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047
197
1 you t hat t he f r ont compar t ment may l i kel y be a pl ace
2 wher e t he f i r ear m was or t he gun?
3 A. I don' t t hi nk he t ol d me t hat at t hat
4 t i me.
5 Q. And t hen subsequent t o t hat i s when you
6 went t o Mr . Davi s' s of f i ce. I bel i eve i t was on
7 J une 2nd. I f you go t o Page 21, i t st ar t s J une 2nd,
8 and cont i nues t o t he next page al l t he way down t o
9 4: 00 p. m. on t hat dat e. That ' s when he pr ovi ded t o
10 you t hi s bl ack box and t hen event ual l y you f ol l owed
11 up wi t h Wayne Wi l l i ams, cor r ect ?
12 A. That ' s cor r ect .
13 Q. At t hat t i me when he gave you t he bl ack
14 box, di d he t el l you t hat i t was l i kel y t hat may
15 have been what was suspect ed t o be t he gun?
16 A. No.
17 Q. Now, on J ul y 22, 2011 i s when you were
18 f i nal l y abl e t o i nt er vi ew J asmi ne Davi s, cor r ect ?
19 A. J ul y 22nd. I t sounds r i ght . I woul d have
20 t o l ook t hr ough and ver i f y t he dat e, but - -
21 THE COURT: What was t he year ?
22 MR. DURKEE: 2011. J ul y 22, 2011.
23 A. J ul y 22nd, yes, 2011.
24 Q. And you woul d agr ee wi t h me t hat
25 chr onol ogi cal l y t hat was af t er t he bl ack box had
-
8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz
29/153
Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014
Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460
www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047
198
1 been di scover ed i n t he f r ont compar t ment by
2 Mr . Davi s, cor r ect ?
3 A. Yes. That occur r ed af t er , yes.
4 Q. And i t was al so af t er i t was di scover ed
5 t hat Reynal do was deaf and had a pr of oundl y hard
6 t i me maki ng noi se, cor r ect ?
7 A. I ' m sor r y, say t hat agai n.
8 Q. That was al so af t er i t was common
9 knowl edge, newspapers, et cet era, t hat Reynal do was
10 deaf and mut e, cor r ect ?
11 A. I knew t hat . I don' t know i f i t was i n
12 t he newspaper s or common knowl edge, but I knew t hat
13 he was - - he was deaf but he coul d make noi ses and
14 sounds and wor ds.
15 Q. Thi s was t he f i r st t i me t hat anybody had
16 t ol d you t hat t her e was somet hi ng t hat l ooked l i ke a
17 gun t hat had been pl aced i n t he f r ont compar t ment of
18 t he wave r unner , cor r ect ?
19 A. I bel i eve so. Fr om Mr s. Davi s' s
20 i nt er vi ew, I bel i eve so.
21 Q. And t hi s i s t he f i r st t i me anyone t ol d you
22 he was r eachi ng i n t he f r ont compar t ment when he was
23 shot , cor r ect ?
24 A. That was her st atement , yes.
25 Q. Now, she t ol d you i n her st at ement t hat
-
8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz
30/153
Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014
Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460
www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047
199
1 she r ecal l ed t el l i ng t he of f i cer s t hat t he man had a
2 gun and t o l ook f or a gun, cor r ect ?
3 A. That i s cor r ect .
4 Q. Di d you ever ask her , "Ma' am, why di dn' t
5 you t el l us t hat i t was i n t he f r ont compar t ment "?
6 A. I don' t know i f I asked her t hat speci f i c
7 quest i on, but she expl ai ned t hat i n her i nt er vi ew.
8 Q. How di d she expl ai n t hat ?
9 A. Wel l , she expl ai ned t hat she saw hi m l ean
10 f or war d put t i ng somet hi ng i n t he f r ont compar t ment ,
11 whi ch she bel i eved t o be t he gun t hat he was hol di ng
12 i n hi s hands, and t hen he agai n l eaned i n t he f r ont
13 compar t ment , whi ch i s why she t hought he was goi ng
14 t o shoot her .
15 Q. Ri ght , whi ch i t woul d seem t hat her , mor e
16 t han anybody el se i n t he whol e wor l d, woul d want
17 somebody t o l ook i n t hat f r ont compar t ment and l ook
18 f or t he gun, r i ght ? I mean, t hat ' s t he t hi ng t hat
19 was causi ng her t he f ear t o shoot somebody i n t he
20 head had der i ved f r om, was t hi s f r ont compar t ment
21 t hat supposedl y i n her mi nd cont ai ned a gun.
22 Now, she t ol d you i n her st at ement t hat
23 she r ecal l ed t el l i ng t he of f i cer s t hat he had a gun
24 and t hat t hey shoul d l ook f or i t . But why di dn' t
25 you t el l her , "Ma' am, why di dn' t you t el l us t o l ook
-
8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz
31/153
Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014
Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460
www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047
200
1 i n t he f r ont compar t ment ?"
2 A. Why di dn' t I say t hat t o her ?
3 Q. Yes, I mean, t hat woul d seem l ogi cal .
4 "Ma' am, you were at t he scene. We are here wi t h t he
5 pol i ce of f i cer s. You have a cr i mi nal def ense l awyer
6 st andi ng r i ght next t o you. You' r e pr of f er i ng
7 st at ement s. The one pi ece of evi dence t hat i s
8 excul pat or y, t hat pr oves you j ust i f i ed i n shoot i ng
9 t hi s f el l ow, i s t he gun. "
10 Why woul dn' t she, among al l t he peopl e
11 t hat wer e out t her e, woul d want t o f i nd t hat gun?
12 You had suba di ver s l ooki ng al l ar ound t he wat er
13 l ooki ng f or i t . Why di dn' t you ask her , "Ma' am, why
14 di dn' t you t el l me t he gun was i n t he f r ont
15 compar t ment ? I was st andi ng r i ght t her e. "
16 MR. MURPHY: Obj ect i on, J udge,
17 argument at i ve.
18 THE COURT: Over r ul ed.
19 Q. You don' t have an answer t o t hat ?
20 A. No, no, no. The way you' r e ani mat ed, I
21 don' t know, I ' m j ust not l i ke t hat . So I don' t know
22 why I di dn' t t el l her , ma' am, I can' t bel i eve you
23 di dn' t t el l me. That ' s not how I spoke t o her .
24 Q. Now, al so at t hat poi nt , because we know
25 Reynal do was deaf and mut e, t he st or y changed a
-
8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz
32/153
Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014
Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460
www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047
201
1 l i t t l e bi t f r om her f i r st st at ement . Her f i r st
2 st at ement was, " I sai d I had a gun" and he
3 r esponded, " I have a gun, t oo. "
4 Now her st at ement says he' s onl y sayi ng
5 one wor d, "gun. " I s t hat r i ght ?
6 A. I don' t know t hat her st at ement ever was
7 t hat he st at ed, " I have a gun, t oo. " I don' t know
8 t hat . She t ol d me t hat he sai d, "gun, " and t hat he
9 had what she bel i eved was a gun i n hi s hands.
10 Q. Wel l , i n At t or ney Rat zan' s pr of f er t o you
11 at t he scene, she pr of f er ed t o you on behal f of Ms.
12 J asmi ne Davi s t he f ol l owi ng quot e, " J asmi ne t ol d t he
13 man she had a gun and t he man sai d he had a gun,
14 t oo, " r i ght ?
15 A. So unl ess you' r e quot i ng f r om my r epor t , I
16 di dn' t use quot at i ons and t her e i s not quot e t her e.
17 Q. But you - -
18 A. I t says, " J asmi ne t ol d t he man she had a
19 gun and t he man sai d he had a gun, t oo. " I t i s
20 r easonabl e t o me t hat by sayi ng, "gun, " havi ng
21 somet hi ng t hat l ooks l i ke gun, coul d be sai d he had
22 a gun, t oo.
23 Q. But now she t el l s you i n her st at ement
24 t hat t he onl y t hi ng she hear d was maybe t he word,
25 "gun, " r i ght ?
-
8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz
33/153
Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014
Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460
www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047
202
1 A. I don' t know i f she sai d maybe t hat ' s what
2 she hear d, but she t ol d me t hat she hear d hi m say
3 "gun. "
4 Q. And, agai n, i n her st or y t hat she pr ovi ded
5 t o you i n her st at ement , she i s not sayi ng t hat he
6 sai d gun i n r esponse t o her command. He j ust
7 sol i ci t s - - he j ust says t he wor d "gun, " r i ght when
8 he i s st andi ng next t o t he wave r unner wi t h
9 somet hi ng bl ack i n hi s hands, r i ght ?
10 A. I don' t know. I woul d have t o l ook
11 t hr ough and r ead i t agai n.
12 Q. Let ' s see i f we can f i nd i t t oget her .
13 A. I ' m sor r y, what page ar e we on?
14 Q. I t ' s on Page 35. I t ' s on Page 38.
15 A. Page 38 at t he t op.
16 Q. Yes, at t he t op.
17 So, I mean, she doesn' t say anyt hi ng about
18 t he f act t hat she sai d she had a gun and t hen he
19 sai d he had a gun, t oo. She j ust basi cal l y says
20 t hat she l ost t r ack of hi m f or a second, t hen he
21 popped out f r om behi nd t he wave runner , whi ch was on
22 t he el ect r i cal l i f t i n t he backyar d. The man t hen
23 came ar ound t o t he f r ont of t he wave r unner and she
24 not i ced t he f r ont of t he hood of t he wave r unner
25 open. She hear d t he man say, " quot e, unquot e - - and
-
8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz
34/153
Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014
Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460
www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047
203
1 t hi s one i s i n quot es, "gun, " r i ght ?
2 A. That ' s cor r ect .
3 Q. So i t ' s no l onger i n r esponse t o her
4 sayi ng, " I have a gun, " and t hen he says, " I have a
5 gun, t oo" or "gun" i n r esponse t o her , i t ' s j ust he
6 goes by t he wave r unner and says, "gun"?
7 A. Ri ght , I don' t know t hat anywher e i t says
8 t hat hi s st at ement was i n di r ect r esponse t o her s.
9 She sai d she had a gun and he sai d he had a gun,
10 t oo. So sayi ng "gun, " t hat f i t s.
11 Q. Ri ght , but i f i t had been t he ot her way,
12 i f i t had been t he way she or i gi nal l y wr i t t en down,
13 her sayi ng, " I have a gun, " and he sai d, " I have a
14 gun, t oo, " i f i t was t hat way, i t r eal l y coul dn' t
15 have happened t hat way because he was deaf . So he
16 coul dn' t have r esponded t o her when she was t al ki ng
17 t o hi m, r i ght ?
18 A. Wel l , he pr obabl y di dn' t f or m t he sent ence
19 because he coul dn' t do t hat . I have a gun, t oo, I
20 don' t bel i eve t hat he ever sai d t hat .
21 Q. And he coul dn' t have r esponded t o her
22 ver bal commands because he coul dn' t hear , r i ght ?
23 A. Of cour se he coul d r espond t o her
24 commands. He coul d r ead l i ps.
25 Q. Okay.
-
8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz
35/153
Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014
Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460
www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047
204
1 A. So I don' t know why - - he coul d def i ni t el y
2 r espond t o her .
3 Q. So i t ' s your i nt er pr et at i on t hat i n t hi s
4 moment of anar chy and ever yt hi ng el se, he' s l ooki ng
5 at her and r eadi ng her l i ps of " I have a gun, " and
6 t hat ' s how you sor t of r ect i f y t hi s?
7 A. I have no i ssue wi t h t hat . He coul d ver y
8 wel l be r eadi ng her l i ps and hear her say t hat she
9 has a gun. That di dn' t seem unr easonabl e t o me.
10 Q. Now, dur i ng t he st at ement she al so t ol d
11 you t hat when she wal ked out t he backdoor , she
12 not i ced t here was a st r anger i n her yar d, number
13 one. She not i ced t hat t he wave r unner was uncover ed
14 and t he f ami l y' s boat was not i n t he backyar d and
15 t he east st orage cl oset was open and t hat ' s when she
16 became scar ed, cor r ect ?
17 A. I don' t know i f t hose t hi ngs happened i n
18 t he or der t hat you j ust sai d, but al l of t hose
19 t hi ngs di d occur .
20 Q. But t hat ' s when she got scar ed i s when she
21 came out t he backdoor and not i ced t hose t hi ngs,
22 r i ght ?
23 A. Wel l , she wasn' t scared when she went out
24 t he backdoor . She became scared as a r esul t of al l
25 of t hose t hi ngs t hat wer e happeni ng.
-
8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz
36/153
Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014
Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460
www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047
205
1 Q. Now, l et me ask you i f you r emember t hi s
2 quest i on and t hi s answer on Page 57 of your
3 deposi t i on.
4 "Q. So at t he t i me she began t o get
5 scar ed, she was wal ki ng down t o t he st orage ar ea
6 t owar ds t he seawal l . I s t hat r i ght ?
7 "A. I t appear s as t hough she wal ked out
8 t he backyard. She hadn' t wal ked al l t he way down or
9 t owar ds t he seawal l . She j ust wal ked out of her
10 backdoor .
11 "Q. She j ust wal ked out of her backdoor ,
12 not i ced t hese t hi ngs and began t o get scar ed. I s
13 t hat what she t ol d you?
14 "A. Yes. "
15 Do you r emember gi vi ng t hat t est i mony?
16 A. Yes.
17 Q. So J asmi ne t ol d you t hat as soon as she
18 got out t he backdoor , t hat ' s when she st ar t ed t o get
19 scar ed, r i ght ?
20 A. No. What I sai d t hen and what I am sayi ng
21 now i s t hat when she came out si de of her backdoor ,
22 af t er al l of t he t hi ngs t hat she obser ved and t he
23 t hi ngs t hat wer e happeni ng, she got scared.
24 Q. That ' s what you t ol d me i n your
25 deposi t i on, r i ght , what I j ust r ead, r i ght ?
-
8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz
37/153
Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014
Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460
www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047
206
1 A. Whi ch i s t he same t hi ng I ' m sayi ng r i ght
2 now.
3 Q. Okay.
4 Now, you f i nal l y i nt er vi ewed J ack Davi s on
5 November 29, 2011, si x mont hs af t er t he shoot i ng.
6 We t al ked about t hat , r i ght ?
7 A. That i s cor r ect .
8 Q. And one of t he mai n t hi ngs he sai d was he
9 shot because hi s mot her t ol d hi m t hat t he f el l ow i n
10 t he wat er had a gun, r i ght ?
11 A. Ri ght .
12 Q. Now, you al r eady t ol d t he Cour t you
13 l i st ened t o t he 911 t ape. Fi r st of al l , t hr oughout
14 t he 911 t ape, Ms. J asmi ne Davi s i s t al ki ng i n a ver y
15 exci t ed and i n a hi gh, al most scr eami ng on t he 911
16 t ape, cor r ect ?
17 A. I r ecal l her bei ng ver y exci t ed, yes.
18 Q. And you never heard on t hat 911 t ape her
19 say t o her son, "He' s got a gun"?
20 A. I don' t r ecal l hear i ng t hat . I haven' t
21 l i st ened t o t he 911 t ape f or qui t e some t i me.
22 Q. Wel l , i sn' t t hat what a l ead i nvest i gat or
23 i s supposed t o do? You got t wo f ol ks t hat have
24 al r eady l i ed t o you. You know t hei r cr edi bi l i t y
25 f r om t he day t hi s i nvest i gat i on st ar t ed shoul d be
-
8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz
38/153
Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014
Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460
www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047
207
1 di mi ni shed because t hey have al r eady l i ed t o t he
2 pol i ce of f i cer s and now you got hi m sayi ng t he sol e
3 r eason I shot was because my mom t ol d me he had a
4 gun. Woul dn' t you go back t o t he 911 t ape and see
5 whet her you ever hear d her t el l her son i n t hi s
6 exci t ed voi ce, "He' s got a gun. Be car ef ul , he' s
7 got a gun?"
8 Woul dn' t you at l east do t hat t o
9 i nvest i gat e whet her hi s st or y t hat he' s t el l i ng i s
10 t r ue or not ?
11 A. As I sai d, I ' m sur e I l i s tened t o t he
12 t ape. I di dn' t make a not at i on. I don' t r ecal l
13 hear i ng her say t hat .
14 Q. I mean, whet her she sai d t hat t o hi m or
15 not i s cr uci al t o your i nvest i gat i on, i sn' t i t ?
16 A. That she t ol d hi m he had a gun? He i s - -
17 i s i t i mpor t ant ? I t ' s al l i mpor t ant .
18 Q. Wel l , I mean, wi t hout her t el l i ng hi m he' s
19 got a gun, he' s got no r easonabl e f ear f or hi s l i f e
20 because t here i s no gun. He di dn' t know t here was a
21 gun out t her e. He never saw a gun.
22 A. Hi s f ear was f r om hi s mot her , hi s mot her ' s
23 r eact i on t o what was goi ng on. He was r eact i ng of f
24 of hi s mot her , cl ear l y.
25 Q. Cl ear l y, but t hat doesn' t gi ve you a r i ght
-
8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz
39/153
Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014
Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460
www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047
208
1 t o shoot somebody i n t he head. What he sai d i s I
2 shot because I was i n f ear f or my l i f e because my
3 mom t ol d me he had a gun.
4 So t hat ' s r eal l y t he key par t of usi ng
5 deadl y f or ce i s t hat he i s i n f ear f or hi s l i f e,
6 r i ght ?
7 A. Ri ght . I bel i eve he was i n f ear f or hi s
8 l i f e.
9 Q. And t he r eason he' s i n f ear f or hi s l i f e
10 i s because he f eel s l i ke t he f el l ow i n t he wat er has
11 a gun and t he way he der i ves t hat i nf ormat i on,
12 accor di ng t o hi s st at ement , i s hi s mot her t el l s hi m
13 he' s got a gun. That ' s what he t ol d you, r i ght ?
14 A. Yes, t hat ' s what he sai d.
15 Q. So t hen my quest i on t o you i s, do you
16 speci f i cal l y r ecal l af t er he gave t hi s st at ement
17 goi ng back t o t he 911 t ape t o see whet her t here was
18 any r ecor di ng of t he mot her t el l i ng t he son he' s got
19 a gun?
20 A. I j ust t ol d you t hat I l i st ened t o t he 911
21 t ape and I di d not hear her say t hat . I t doesn' t
22 mean she di dn' t say i t . I di d not hear her say t hat
23 on t he 911 t ape.
24 Q. Now, somet hi ng el se t hat he t ol d you i n
25 hi s st at ement was t hat when he t ook t he wave r unner
-
8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz
40/153
Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014
Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460
www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047
209
1 and st ar t ed t o go out t o t he bay and l eave t he
2 pr emi ses, t hat hi s mot her sai d i n an exci t ed way and
3 you put quot es on t hi s - -
4 A. What page?
5 Q. I t ' s wher e he gi ves hi s st at ement , but I
6 wi l l f i nd i t f or you.
7 A. On Page 47?
8 Q. I t hi nk t hat ' s i t .
9 A. Okay.
10 Q. Ri ght . I wi l l quot e i t f or you. He t ol d
11 you, " J ack' s mot her sai d t o hi m t o wai t . She was
12 exci t ed and sai d, " and you wr ot e t hi s one i n quot es,
13 "Wai t ! Wai t ! Wai t ! Ver y qui ckl y. They st ar t ed t o
14 f eel r el i ef t he man was goi ng t o l eave. "
15 I asked you agai n, "She sai d t hi s i n an
16 exci t ed and l oud manner , wai t , wai t , he' s l eavi ng. "
17 Di d you ever go back t o t he 911 t ape t o see whet her
18 you coul d ver i f y whet her she i n f act r eal l y di d say
19 that?
20 A. I t ol d you t hat I l i st ened t o t he 911
21 t ape.
22 Q. Di d you hear J asmi ne Davi s scr eami ng,
23 "Wai t , wai t , wai t "?
24 A. I don' t r ecal l her screami ng, "Wai t , wai t ,
25 wai t . "
-
8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz
41/153
Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014
Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460
www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047
210
1 Q. I mean, don' t you agr ee i f t he 911 t ape,
2 whi ch was r ecor di ng cont emporaneousl y wi t h t hi s
3 event happeni ng, doesn' t suppor t t hese st at ement s
4 t hat ar e gi ven si x mont hs l at er , t her e i s some
5 cont r adi ct i on her e?
6 A. I have no i ssue wi t h i t . The phone coul d
7 have been away f r om her mout h. Maybe i t wasn' t next
8 t o her mout h when she was t al ki ng.
9 Q. But t hese ar e f ol ks - -
10 A. I have no i ssue wi t h t hat what soever .
11 Q. These f ol ks al r eady have di mi ni shed
12 credi bi l i t y wi t h you. You t ol d us t hat , because
13 t hey l i ed, bot h of t hem di d, r i ght of f t he bat ,
14 r i ght ?
15 A. They di dn' t l i e t o me. What I was t ol d by
16 t he ot her of f i cer s was not t he same t hi ng I was t ol d
17 by J ack and J asmi ne. So t hey never l i ed t o me.
18 Q. You knew t hat t hese f ol ks, t he ver y f i r st
19 t hi ng t hey di d when t al ki ng t o pol i ce of f i cer s af t er
20 t hi s shoot i ng, was t o l i e. You knew t hat , di dn' t
21 you?
22 A. That was t he st at ement t hat t hey made,
23 yes.
24 Q. And we al r eady t al ked about t hat . At t he
25 ver y begi nni ng of my cr oss exami nat i on I sai d t o you
-
8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz
42/153
Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014
Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460
www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047
211
1 when peopl e l i e t o t he pol i ce, you have t o put a
2 l i t t l e mar k, cr edi bi l i t y i s a f act or and you agr eed
3 wi t h t hat . Cr edi bi l i t y has t o be l ooked at ,
4 correct?
5 A. I woul d agr ee wi t h t hat , but I t hi nk you
6 al so t ake t he t ot al i t y of t he ci r cumst ances and you
7 t r y t o under st and - - as pol i ce of f i cer s, we t r y t o
8 under st and why do peopl e l i e? What i s t hei r
9 mot i vat i on? What ' s goi ng on? Peopl e l i e t o t he
10 pol i ce al l t he t i me.
11 Q. Absol ut el y. And t hen you go back and t r y
12 and pul l out obj ect i ve evi dence and compar e i t t o
13 t hei r s tat ement s t o see i f i t al l j i ves , r i ght ?
14 A. That ' s r i ght .
15 Q. Because t hat way, you got t hese peopl e
16 t hat have some di mi ni shed credi bi l i t y, t hey l i ed, we
17 know t hat , so now we' ve got t o real l y hol d t hem up
18 t o t he br i ght l i ght of obj ect i ve f act s and see
19 whet her we can support what ' s comi ng out of t hei r
20 mout h.
21 So i t seems l i ke you woul d go back t o t he
22 911 t ape and see whether you coul d ver i f y t hese
23 st at ement s t hat J ack was maki ng on t he 911 t ape.
24 Di d you do t hat ?
25 A. I j ust t ol d you t hat I l i st ened t o i t and
-
8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz
43/153
Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014
Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460
www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047
212
1 I di dn' t hear , "Wai t , wai t , wai t , " nor di d I hear
2 t hat he had a gun. I ' m not sur e what el se you' r e
3 aski ng.
4 Q. Wel l , t hat ' s what I was aski ng.
5 A. Wel l , I answer ed t hat t wi ce al r eady.
6 Q. Now, t he obj ect i ve evi dence ot her t han t he
7 st at ement s t hat were gi ven by J asmi ne and J ack was,
8 number one, you gat her ed up f i nger pr i nt s t hat we
9 know you wer en' t abl e t o gat her any - - I f or get what
10 t he cr i mi nal cour t uses, but i t ' s any evi dence t hat
11 was of val ue f or t he f i nger pr i nt s t hat you guys
12 t ook. I s t hat cor r ect ?
13 A. That i s cor r ect .
14 Q. Then you t ook DNA al l over t he scene, not
15 al l over t he scene, but i n cer t ai n l ocat i ons and you
16 wer e abl e t o gat her no evi dence t hat was of val ue
17 wi t h t he DNA t est i ng. I s t hat r i ght ?
18 A. That ' s cor r ect .
19 Q. And you were hopi ng t o suppor t Ms. Davi s' s
20 and J ack' s st at ement t hat he was al l t he way up by
21 t he f r ont of t he st or age f aci l i t y because maybe hi s
22 DNA had t r ansf er r ed ont o t he door or maybe hi s
23 f i nger pr i nt s had t r ansf er r ed i n t he ar ea t hat was up
24 by t he house, cor r ect ?
25 A. Wel l , t hat ' s t he r eason we swabbed t he
-
8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz
44/153
Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014
Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460
www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047
213
1 door and dust ed t he door s t o see i f we can f i nd hi s
2 f i nger pr i nt s.
3 Q. And you never f ound any obj ect i ve evi dence
4 t hat suppor t ed t hat he was up by t he house?
5 A. We had a negat i ve r esul t wi t h t he
6 f i nger pr i nt s and t he DNA.
7 Q. So t her e was no obj ect i ve evi dence t o
8 suppor t t he st at ement of J asmi ne t hat he was up by
9 t he st or age f aci l i t i es, cor r ect ?
10 A. Yeah, t hat ' s r i ght .
11 Q. You al so had obj ect i ve evi dence t hat
12 Reynal do had been shot f r om behi nd and t he bul l et s
13 wer e comi ng f r om t he back r i ght t o t he back par t of
14 hi s head. I s t hat r i ght ?
15 A. I ' m showi ng on t he r i ght si de. Back t o
16 f r ont , r i ght si de.
17 Q. But back t o f r ont , cor r ect ?
18 A. I bel i eve t hat ' s what t he aut opsy says.
19 Q. You obvi ousl y went down and t al ked t o t he
20 medi cal exami ner t o make sur e you knew exact l y what
21 hi s f i ndi ng wer e and hi s opi ni ons wer e as a r esul t
22 of where t he shoot er was when he got hi t wi t h t he
23 bul l et s, r i ght ?
24 A. That was di scussed, yes.
25 Q. And he t ol d you t hat t he shooter was
-
8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz
45/153
Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014
Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460
www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047
214
1 behi nd hi m r i ght t o l ef t , back t o f r ont ?
2 A. I t was on t he r i ght si de. So back t o
3 f r ont .
4 Q. The bul l et s wer e comi ng f r om behi nd?
5 A. Fr om t he r i ght si de. Not f r om behi nd.
6 Fr om t he r i ght si de and back t o f r ont and sl i ght l y
7 downward, I bel i eve. You have a copy of t he aut opsy
8 r epor t , r i ght ?
9 Q. I do, and we have t aken hi s deposi t i on so
10 t he Cour t wi l l be abl e t o r ead t hat , but you
11 r emember me aski ng t hi s quest i on and you gi vi ng t hi s
12 answer on Page 58:
13 "Q. So he had t o have been f aci ng away
14 f r om t he gun when he was shot . I s t hat r i ght ?
15 "A. The back of hi s head was t owards t he
16 gun, yes.
17 "Q. Okay, and you t hi nk t hat he was
18 f aci ng when he was shot t owar ds t he bay or do you
19 t hi nk he was f aci ng t owar ds t he pr oper t y?
20 "A. Wel l , i f t hey wer e st andi ng on t he
21 seawal l and he was shot i n t he back t owar d t he
22 f r ont , t hen he woul d have had t o have been f aci ng
23 t owar ds t he bay. "
24 Do you r emember gi vi ng t hose answer s?
25 A. Yes.
-
8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz
46/153
Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014
Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460
www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047
215
1 Q. And you agr ee wi t h t hat as you si t her e
2 t oday?
3 A. Yes, f r om r i ght si de, back t o f r ont , yes,
4 he woul d have t o be f aci ng t he bay.
5 MR. DURKEE: Thank you. I have no f ur t her
6 quest i ons.
7 THE COURT: Redi r ect .
8 MR. MURPHY: Yes.
9 MR. DURKEE: Oh, I have one f ur t her one,
10 Your Honor . I ' m sor r y.
11 THE COURT: That ' s okay.
12 Q. ( By Mr . Dur kee) I ' m goi ng t o show you now
13 what has been mar ked as Pl ai nt i f f ' s 1- L f or I D and
14 what was pr evi ousl y marked as 1- K f or I D.
15 You i nst r uct ed or somebody i nst r uct ed t he
16 cr i me scene i nvest i gat or s t o t ake a pi ct ur e of J ack
17 and t o t ake a pi ct ur e of t he shi r t he had on when he
18 di d t he shoot i ng. I s t hat r i ght ?
19 A. Yes.
20 Q. By t he t i me t he pol i ce had got t en t her e,
21 J ack had al r eady changed hi s shi r t , number one,
22 true?
23 A. He was wear i ng a di f f er ent shi r t .
24 Q. And t he shi r t t hat he had on dur i ng t he
25 shoot i ng had al r eady been pl aced i n a bucket wi t h
-
8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz
47/153
Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014
Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460
www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047
216
1 soapy wat er and had t o be ret r i eved by t he pol i ce,
2 correct?
3 A. Yes. The Davi s housekeeper was ver y
4 ef f i ci ent .
5 Q. To say t he l east .
6 Now, you have i nvest i gat ed l ot s of
7 homi ci des and ever yt hi ng el se. I mean, you
8 underst and t hat peopl e may t r y and cover up
9 evi dence, cor r ect ?
10 A. Peopl e do t hat , yes.
11 Q. Di d t hi s r ai se any suspi ci on t o you t hat
12 wi t hi n t he f i r s t hal f hour , wi t hi n t he f i r s t f ew
13 mi nut es af t er t he shoot i ng, t hat t he shoot er had
14 al r eady changed shi r t s and t he bl oody shi r t had been
15 put i n somet hi ng t o cl ean i t ? Di d t hat r ai se any
16 suspi ci on t o you at al l ?
17 A. No.
18 MR. DURKEE: Okay. Thank you. I have no
19 f ur t her quest i ons.
20 THE COURT: Redi r ect .
21 MR. MURPHY: Yes.
22 REDI RECT EXAMI NATI ON
23 BY MR. MURPHY:
24 Q. Det ect i ve Nye, j ust a f ew f ol l ow- up
25 quest i ons. You wer e posed quest i ons f r om t he
-
8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz
48/153
Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014
Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460
www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047
217
1 l awyer , whi ch I t hi nk you pr obabl y f i gur ed out wer e
2 goi ng t owar d t he gi st of an ar gument t hat t he cr i me
3 scene was somehow cont ami nat ed and wi t nesses wer e
4 not bei ng sequest er ed. Di d you get t hat i mpr essi on
5 f r om t he quest i ons?
6 A. Yes.
7 Q. Now, consi der i ng what was br ought up, di d
8 any of t hat i n t hi s i nvest i gat i on ever cause you or
9 l ead you t o bel i eve t hat because of any al l eged
10 sequest r at i on pr obl ems or cr i me scene cont ami nat i on,
11 t hat t he Davi ses wer e not i n l egi t i mat e f ear of t he
12 t hr eat t hat t hey wer e r epor t i ng based upon t hat
13 al l eged cont ami nat i on and sequest r at i on of wi t ness
14 probl ems?
15 MR. DURKEE: Obj ect i on, Your Honor .
16 THE COURT: I ' m goi ng t o over r ul e t hat
17 obj ect i on t he way i t was phr ased. You may
18 answer .
19 A. I t has no af f ect on t hei r absol ut e f ear
20 and t er r or , none what soever .
21 Q. Counsel asked you a l ot of quest i ons about
22 t he f i r st l i e t hat t hey t ol d you and t hat t he l i e,
23 and we tal ked about i t and i t has been acknowl edged
24 i n t hi s case, t hat i s, t he f act t hat J asmi ne Davi s
25 at t he out set sai d t hat she was t he one t hat shot
-
8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz
49/153
-
8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz
50/153
Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014
Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460
www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047
219
1 i nt egr i t y or cr edi t abi l i t y of t hei r ver si on of what
2 happened and t he f ear and t hr eat t hat t hey
3 exper i enced?
4 MR. DURKEE: Obj ect i on.
5 THE COURT: Over r ul ed.
6 A. No, not at al l .
7 Q. You were asked some quest i ons about i f you
8 coul d have - - r emember t he quest i ons about , wai t ,
9 wai t , wai t ? Remember t hose quest i ons scr eami ng,
10 wai t , wai t , wai t ?
11 A. Yes.
12 Q. And you were di r ect ed t o Page 47 of your
13 r epor t , r emember?
14 A. Yes.
15 Q. And r emember t he at t orney I t hi nk was
16 sayi ng somet hi ng about - - he sai d i n an exci t ed
17 t one, wai t , wai t , wai t , and he was act ual l y shout i ng
18 i t more t han exci t ed. Do you r emember t hat quest i on
19 a f ew mi nut es ago?
20 A. Yes.
21 Q. I woul d l i ke t o di r ect you t o Page 47 and
22 I t hi nk t he passage t hat we wer e deal i ng wi t h t hat
23 he was r ef er enci ng appear s t o be t he l ast sent ence
24 i n t hat mi ddl e par agr aph. Do you see t hat ?
25 A. Yes, I do.
-
8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz
51/153
Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014
Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460
www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047
220
1 Q. Coul d you r ead t hat ? And t hi s i s a
2 par aphr asi ng of t he st at ement t hat J ack gave t o you,
3 correct?
4 A. Yes.
5 Q. Wi t h r egar d t o t hat , wai t , wai t , wai t
6 i ssue, coul d you pl ease r ead what you r epor t ed t hat
7 J ack sai d i n t hat st at ement ver bat i m, wor d f or wor d?
8 A. " J ack' s mot her sai d f or hi m t o wai t . She
9 was ver y exci t ed and sai d, wai t , wai t , wai t ver y
10 qui ckl y. "
11 Q. Hol d on. Let ' s t ake i t sl owl y. That l ast
12 sent ence, do you see t hat l ast sent ence t hat says,
13 "She was exci t ed"?
14 A. Uh- huh.
15 Q. Do you see t hat ?
16 A. Yes.
17 Q. Read t hat sent ence, i f you coul d, i n i t s
18 ent i r et y and ver y sl owl y, pl ease.
19 A. "She was exci t ed and sai d" - -
20 Q. Fi r st par t of i t i s, "She was exci t ed. "
21 We al l agr ee t hat she was exci t ed, r i ght ?
22 A. Yes.
23 Q. Next par t of i t .
24 A. "She was exci t ed and sai d, wai t , wai t ,
25 wai t ver y qui ckl y. " That ' s i t .
-
8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz
52/153
Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014
Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460
www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047
221
1 Q. I t says, "She was exci t ed and t hen sai d,
2 wai t , wai t , wai t . " I t doesn' t char act er i ze how she
3 sai d i t . I t doesn' t say t hat she was screami ng i t .
4 I t j ust st at es t hat she was exci t ed and t hen sai d
5 wai t , wai t , wai t , ver y qui ckl y, " r i ght ?
6 A. Yes.
7 Q. So t hat ' s t he descr i pt i on of t he wai t ,
8 wai t , wai t , r i ght ? Not t hat i t was shout ed, not
9 t hat i t was scr eamed, but t hat i t was sai d ver y
10 qui ckl y, cor r ect ?
11 A. That ' s cor r ect .
12 Q. And t hat ' s exact l y what t hat sent ence
13 sai d?
14 A. That ' s cor r ect .
15 MR. MURPHY: That ' s al l I have.
16 MR. DURKEE: May I have a br i ef r ecr oss?
17 THE COURT: I f i t ' s on somet hi ng new.
18 MR. DURKEE: One quest i on.
19 THE COURT: Go ahead.
20 RECROSS EXAMI NATI ON
21 BY MR. DURKEE:
22 Q. You know what an excl amat i on poi nt i s,
23 r i ght ?
24 A. I do.
25 Q. I mean, you' r e wr i t i ng a pol i ce r epor t on
-
8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz
53/153
Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014
Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460
www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047
222
1 a homi ci de, you want t o be as absol ut el y accur at e as
2 you possi bl y can be, r i ght ?
3 A. That ' s cor r ect .
4 Q. What does an excl amat i on poi nt mean?
5 A. An excl amat i on poi nt i s somet hi ng t hat
6 says wi t h emphasi s.
7 Q. And t hi s i s one of t he ar eas i n your
8 r epor t t hat you act ual l y used quot at i on mar ks
9 because you want ed t o capt ur e ver bat i m what J ack
10 t ol d you, cor r ect ?
11 A. That ' s cor r ect .
12 Q. And you wr ot e i n quot at i on marks, "Wai t !
13 Wai t ! Wai t , " so t hat you accur at el y and compl et el y
14 capt ur e what J ack t ol d you, cor r ect ?
15 A. That i s r i ght , because he sai d, "wai t ,
16 wai t , wai t . "
17 MR. DURKEE: No f ur t her quest i ons.
18 THE COURT: Let me ask a quest i on. When
19 you t ook f i nger pr i nt s t o t r y t o l i f t pr i nt s f r om
20 t he door s or any of t he DNA, were t here any
21 el i mi nat i on pr i nt s or DNA t aken f r om t he peopl e
22 who r esi ded i n t he house?
23 THE WI TNESS: I woul d have t o l ook and
24 see. I don' t r ecal l , but t her e was not hi ng of
25 val ue. I t was such a mi x of DNA, t here was
-
8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz
54/153
Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014
Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460
www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047
223
1 not hi ng t hat coul d be ext r act ed of any val ue.
2 THE COURT: Were t he f i ngerpr i nt s or were
3 any suf f i ci ent poi nt of i dent i f i cat i on, wer e
4 t hey of any val ue, do you now?
5 THE WI TNESS: No, t her e was no val ue
6 what soever .
7 THE COURT: Al l r i ght . Thank you.
8 Anythi ng el se?
9 MR. DURKEE: No, Your Honor .
10 THE COURT: Thank you, Det ect i ve
11 Nye- Gonzal ez. You may st ep down.
12 ( Wi t ness excused. )
13 THE COURT: We have been goi ng f or an
14 hour , what do we have l ef t ?
15 MR. MURPHY: J udge, f r om our poi nt of
16 vi ew, we j ust woul d admi t recor ds i nt o evi dence
17 and ot her t han t hat we woul d r est .
18 MR. DURKEE: That ' s goi ng t o t ake some
19 t i me because he j ust want s t he whol e t hi ng
20 submi t t ed and I don' t thi nk al l of i t shoul d be
21 submi t t ed.
22 MR. MURPHY: Al l of what ?
23 THE COURT: That ' s why we ar e goi ng t o
24 t ake a break now f or 15 mi nut es and you guys can
25 t al k on t he br eak and t hen I wi l l come out and
-
8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz
55/153
Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014
Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460
www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047
224
1 l i st en t o t he r est . So I wi l l be back i n about
2 15 mi nut es.
3 ( Recess t aken. )
4 THE COURT: So Mr . Mur phy?
5 MR. MURPHY: We' r e j ust goi ng t o move our
6 exhi bi t s f or I D i nt o evi dence and t hen some
7 ot her evi dence, but I t hi nk Mr . Dur kee sai d he
8 want ed t o go t hr ough i t f i r st . I don' t know
9 t hat we have a di sagr eement .
10 THE COURT: That ' s f i ne.
11 MR. DURKEE: J ust admi ni st r at i ve at t he
12 end, Your Honor . We al so agr eed t o f our
13 deposi t i ons bei ng submi t t ed t o t he Cour t i n
14 t hei r ent i r et y.
15 And we have bot h gi ven t he Cour t
16 desi gnat i ons as t o what t he def endant , or t he
17 par t y wi t h t he bur den of pr oof i n t hi s hear i ng,
18 has desi gnat ed and al so what we have desi gnat ed
19 as t o what we f eel you shoul d concent r at e on.
20 THE COURT: What are t he f our deposi t i ons?
21 MR. MURPHY: We sent i n a bi nder wi t h
22 t hem, pl us desi gnat i ons.
23 THE COURT: Di d you?
24 MR. MURPHY: Yes.
25 THE COURT: When?
-
8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz
56/153
Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014
Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460
www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047
225
1 MR. MURPHY: Two weeks ago.
2 THE COURT: We have t o f i nd i t , t hen. I
3 want t