evolution of long-axis lake-effect convection during landfall and orographic uplift profiling radar...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Evolution of long-axis lake-effect convection during landfall and orographic uplift Profiling radar observations during OWLeS 1 Ted Letcher & Justin Minder](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022033107/56649cc05503460f94986f17/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
1
Evolution of long-axis lake-effect convection during landfall and orographic uplift
Profiling radar observations during OWLeS
Ted Letcher & Justin Minder University at Albany
Jim Steenburgh, Peter Veals & Leah Campbell
University of Utah
![Page 2: Evolution of long-axis lake-effect convection during landfall and orographic uplift Profiling radar observations during OWLeS 1 Ted Letcher & Justin Minder](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022033107/56649cc05503460f94986f17/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
What determines downwind evolution of LLAP bands & their snowfall?
Mesocale forcings:• Orography• Surface fluxes (heat, moisture, momentum)
Cloud & precipitation structures:• In-cloud ice and supercooled water• Crystal habits• Snowfall
Convective scale dynamics:• Cloud depth• Updraft velocities & turbulence• Horizontal scales/structures• Buoyancy
![Page 3: Evolution of long-axis lake-effect convection during landfall and orographic uplift Profiling radar observations during OWLeS 1 Ted Letcher & Justin Minder](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022033107/56649cc05503460f94986f17/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
Orographic lifting “invigorates” convection
Plausible hypotheses
Orographic lifting produces more “populous” (or wider) convective cells
Orographic lifting enhances low-level growth … or suppresses low-level sublimation
Inland transition leads to clouds that are more “efficient” at producing snowfall.
![Page 4: Evolution of long-axis lake-effect convection during landfall and orographic uplift Profiling radar observations during OWLeS 1 Ted Letcher & Justin Minder](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022033107/56649cc05503460f94986f17/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
Orographic lifting “invigorates” convection
4
Plausible hypotheses
Orographic lifting produces more “populous” (or wider) convective cells
Orographic lifting enhances low-level growth … or suppresses low-level sublimation
Inland transition leads to clouds that are more “efficient” at producing snowfall.
Lackman (2011)
![Page 5: Evolution of long-axis lake-effect convection during landfall and orographic uplift Profiling radar observations during OWLeS 1 Ted Letcher & Justin Minder](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022033107/56649cc05503460f94986f17/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
Orographic lifting “invigorates” convection
5
Orographic lifting produces more “populous” (or wider) convective cells
Orographic lifting enhances low-level growth … or suppresses low-level sublimation
Inland transition leads to clouds that are more “efficient” at producing snowfall.
Plausible hypotheses
?
![Page 6: Evolution of long-axis lake-effect convection during landfall and orographic uplift Profiling radar observations during OWLeS 1 Ted Letcher & Justin Minder](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022033107/56649cc05503460f94986f17/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
Sandy IslandBeach - SIB (75 m)
SandyCreek- SC(175 m)
NorthRedfield -NRED
(385 m)
UpperPlateau- UP
(530 m)
4 Micro Rain Radars (MMR2’s)• 24 GHz, FM-CW, profiling, Doppler• Δz= 200 m• max. height = 6km• Δt = 60 s
Deployment• IOP-phase: Dec-Jan (All sites)• Extended : Oct-Feb (SIB & NRED)
• Observed 17 LLAP eventsCo-located radars for inter-comparison before and during the field campaign
Profiling Radar Observations Goals• Characterize along-band variations in convective
structure with high temporal & vertical resolution
• Improve operational forecasting through a better understanding of involved physical processes.
![Page 7: Evolution of long-axis lake-effect convection during landfall and orographic uplift Profiling radar observations during OWLeS 1 Ted Letcher & Justin Minder](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022033107/56649cc05503460f94986f17/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
Case-study example:IOP2b
![Page 8: Evolution of long-axis lake-effect convection during landfall and orographic uplift Profiling radar observations during OWLeS 1 Ted Letcher & Justin Minder](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022033107/56649cc05503460f94986f17/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
IOP2b snowfall: consistent inland enhancement
SC: 33.5 mm
NRED: 62.5 mm
SC
NRE
D
SC
NREDTotal snow depth
6hr. accumulated SWEOrographic ratio
![Page 9: Evolution of long-axis lake-effect convection during landfall and orographic uplift Profiling radar observations during OWLeS 1 Ted Letcher & Justin Minder](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022033107/56649cc05503460f94986f17/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
Sandy IslandBeach (SIB) IOP2b: time-height structure
time
strong updraft
turbulent
Heavy snow
heig
ht
(
km M
SL)
[dBZ][m
s-1]
[m s
-1]
Reflectivity
Doppler fall velocity
Spectral width
updow
n
>6 ms-1 Updraft!
![Page 10: Evolution of long-axis lake-effect convection during landfall and orographic uplift Profiling radar observations during OWLeS 1 Ted Letcher & Justin Minder](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022033107/56649cc05503460f94986f17/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
heig
ht
(
km M
SL)
time
IOP2b: inland evolution of reflectivity[dBZ]
Reflectivity SIB
SC
NRED
UP
No inland increase in echo top height!
![Page 11: Evolution of long-axis lake-effect convection during landfall and orographic uplift Profiling radar observations during OWLeS 1 Ted Letcher & Justin Minder](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022033107/56649cc05503460f94986f17/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
heig
ht
(
km M
SL)
time
IOP2b: inland evolution of Doppler fall velocity[m
s-1]
Doppler fall velocity SIB
SC
NRED
UP
updow
nup
down
updow
nup
down
![Page 12: Evolution of long-axis lake-effect convection during landfall and orographic uplift Profiling radar observations during OWLeS 1 Ted Letcher & Justin Minder](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022033107/56649cc05503460f94986f17/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
heig
ht
(
km M
SL)
time
IOP2b: inland evolution of spectral width[m
s-1]
Spectral width SIB
SC
NRED
UP
![Page 13: Evolution of long-axis lake-effect convection during landfall and orographic uplift Profiling radar observations during OWLeS 1 Ted Letcher & Justin Minder](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022033107/56649cc05503460f94986f17/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
IOP2b: Echo Tops
![Page 14: Evolution of long-axis lake-effect convection during landfall and orographic uplift Profiling radar observations during OWLeS 1 Ted Letcher & Justin Minder](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022033107/56649cc05503460f94986f17/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
SC NRED UP
surface elev.surface elev.
surface elev.
[% / dBZ]
SIB
IOP2b: dBZ Contoured Frequency by Altitude Diagrams (CFADs)
median
75 th %-tile
25th %
-tile
surface elev.
Histogram of Reflectivity at each range gate
75%25%
Median
![Page 15: Evolution of long-axis lake-effect convection during landfall and orographic uplift Profiling radar observations during OWLeS 1 Ted Letcher & Justin Minder](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022033107/56649cc05503460f94986f17/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15
[dBZ] Freq. [%]
Freq. of dBZ>5
• Larger vertical gradient in dBZ• Narrower distribution of dBZ • Less frequent echoes aloft • More frequent low-level echoes• No evidence of sub-cloud sublimation
@ NRED:
Median & IQR
SIB
NRED
SIB NRED
IOP2b: inland evolution of CFADs (NRED vs. SIB)
[dBZ][dBZ]
heig
ht
[
km M
SL]
![Page 16: Evolution of long-axis lake-effect convection during landfall and orographic uplift Profiling radar observations during OWLeS 1 Ted Letcher & Justin Minder](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022033107/56649cc05503460f94986f17/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16
IOP2b: evidence of sub-cloud sublimation at SCCS?
Decrease in reflectivity at below 1km
SIB SCCSUAH MIPS:XPR SCCS
Continuation of decreasing trend below 1km MSL
![Page 17: Evolution of long-axis lake-effect convection during landfall and orographic uplift Profiling radar observations during OWLeS 1 Ted Letcher & Justin Minder](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022033107/56649cc05503460f94986f17/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
17
Multi-storm perspective:statistics from 17 LLAP storms
![Page 18: Evolution of long-axis lake-effect convection during landfall and orographic uplift Profiling radar observations during OWLeS 1 Ted Letcher & Justin Minder](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022033107/56649cc05503460f94986f17/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
17 LLAP events (Nov 2013-Feb 2014)
Same inland evolution seen in IOP 2:• Reduced variability• Reduced dBZ aloft• Increased low-level echo frequency• Loss of sublimation signature
Bulk CFADS for all LLAP events observed @ SIB & NRED
18
[% / dBZ]
SIB NRED
Freq. [%]
Freq. of dBZ>5Median & IQR
![Page 19: Evolution of long-axis lake-effect convection during landfall and orographic uplift Profiling radar observations during OWLeS 1 Ted Letcher & Justin Minder](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022033107/56649cc05503460f94986f17/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
19
3 Week Holiday Break
Bulk Echo Tops Observed @ SIB and NRED
SIB
NRED
![Page 20: Evolution of long-axis lake-effect convection during landfall and orographic uplift Profiling radar observations during OWLeS 1 Ted Letcher & Justin Minder](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022033107/56649cc05503460f94986f17/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
20
IOP 21: Evidence for intense low-level growth?
![Page 21: Evolution of long-axis lake-effect convection during landfall and orographic uplift Profiling radar observations during OWLeS 1 Ted Letcher & Justin Minder](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022033107/56649cc05503460f94986f17/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
21
IOP 21: Evidence for intense low-level growth?
SIB [dBZ]
21
NRED [dBZ]
time
heig
ht
(
m M
SL)
![Page 22: Evolution of long-axis lake-effect convection during landfall and orographic uplift Profiling radar observations during OWLeS 1 Ted Letcher & Justin Minder](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022033107/56649cc05503460f94986f17/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
22
time
heig
ht
(
m M
SL)
SIB [dBZ]
22
• Not riming (low density aggregates observed)• Not blowing snow (winds are weak)
NRED [dBZ]
IOP 21: Evidence for intense low-level growth?
2nd MRR, with dz = 30 m
![Page 23: Evolution of long-axis lake-effect convection during landfall and orographic uplift Profiling radar observations during OWLeS 1 Ted Letcher & Justin Minder](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022033107/56649cc05503460f94986f17/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
23
IOP 21: NREDOrographic Ratio ~1.5
Low-level increase in reflectivity
![Page 24: Evolution of long-axis lake-effect convection during landfall and orographic uplift Profiling radar observations during OWLeS 1 Ted Letcher & Justin Minder](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022033107/56649cc05503460f94986f17/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
24
Comparison of IOP2b to NEXRAD Beam elevation
![Page 25: Evolution of long-axis lake-effect convection during landfall and orographic uplift Profiling radar observations during OWLeS 1 Ted Letcher & Justin Minder](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022033107/56649cc05503460f94986f17/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
25
IOP2b: NEXRAD beam height
Brown et al. 2007
NEXRAD QPE estimates affected by overshooting issues? Better Coverage?
East WestEastWest
![Page 26: Evolution of long-axis lake-effect convection during landfall and orographic uplift Profiling radar observations during OWLeS 1 Ted Letcher & Justin Minder](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022033107/56649cc05503460f94986f17/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
26
IOP2b: NEXRAD beam heightSIB
NRED
1.0˚
1.0˚
1.5˚
1.5˚
0.5˚
0.5˚
Beam Width
![Page 27: Evolution of long-axis lake-effect convection during landfall and orographic uplift Profiling radar observations during OWLeS 1 Ted Letcher & Justin Minder](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022033107/56649cc05503460f94986f17/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
27
Conclusions (thusfar)
Orographic “invigoration” of convection is not responsible for Tug Hill precip maximum
Compared to upwind, echoes over the Tug are often:• weaker aloft• more-frequent near the ground• Less convective ?
? Hints of important low-level processes over Tug:• Suppressed sublimation?• Enhanced Growth?
Time-height structure of convection typically exhibits a common change in structure between shore and Tug Hill
NEXRAD QPE estimates of LE precipitation may be altered due to overshooting
![Page 28: Evolution of long-axis lake-effect convection during landfall and orographic uplift Profiling radar observations during OWLeS 1 Ted Letcher & Justin Minder](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022033107/56649cc05503460f94986f17/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
28
Extra Slides
![Page 29: Evolution of long-axis lake-effect convection during landfall and orographic uplift Profiling radar observations during OWLeS 1 Ted Letcher & Justin Minder](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022033107/56649cc05503460f94986f17/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
NorthSouth
Upland
Lake
dBZ
dBZ
Vd
Vd
29
IOP2b: inland evolution seen by airborne Wyoming Cloud Radar
![Page 30: Evolution of long-axis lake-effect convection during landfall and orographic uplift Profiling radar observations during OWLeS 1 Ted Letcher & Justin Minder](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022033107/56649cc05503460f94986f17/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
30
![Page 31: Evolution of long-axis lake-effect convection during landfall and orographic uplift Profiling radar observations during OWLeS 1 Ted Letcher & Justin Minder](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022033107/56649cc05503460f94986f17/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
31
Variations in OR during OWLeS
IOP2IOP4
OR = Orographic Ratio = North Redfield SWE/Sandy Creek SWESWE=Snow Water Equivalent
IOP21/22{
![Page 32: Evolution of long-axis lake-effect convection during landfall and orographic uplift Profiling radar observations during OWLeS 1 Ted Letcher & Justin Minder](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022033107/56649cc05503460f94986f17/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
32