ewec 2009: modelling wind flow 19 march 2009 qua

22
9, 19 March 2009 – Dierer et al.: Modelling the risk of icing EWEC 2009: Modelling wind flow 19 March 2009 qua Modelling the risk of icing Dr. Silke Dierer 1 René Cattin 1 Dr. Alain Heimo 1 Bjørn Egil Nygaard 2 Kristiina Säntti 3 1 METEOTEST, Switzerland 2 Norwegian Meteorological Institute, Norway 3 Finnish Meteorological Institute, Finland

Upload: eman

Post on 24-Jan-2016

28 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

EWEC 2009: Modelling wind flow 19 March 2009 qua. Modelling the risk of icing. Dr. Silke Dierer 1 René Cattin 1 Dr. Alain Heimo 1 Bj ørn Egil Nygaard 2 Kristiina Säntti 3 1 METEOTEST, Switzerland 2 Norwegian Meteorological Institute, Norway 3 Finnish Meteorological Institute, Finland. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: EWEC 2009: Modelling wind flow  19 March 2009 qua

EWEC 2009, 19 March 2009 – Dierer et al.: Modelling the risk of icing

EWEC 2009: Modelling wind flow 19 March 2009

quaModelling the risk of icing

Dr. Silke Dierer1

René Cattin1

Dr. Alain Heimo1

Bjørn Egil Nygaard2 Kristiina Säntti3

1 METEOTEST, Switzerland2 Norwegian Meteorological Institute, Norway3 Finnish Meteorological Institute, Finland

Page 2: EWEC 2009: Modelling wind flow  19 March 2009 qua

2

EWEC 2009, 19 March 2009 – Dierer et al.: Modelling the risk of icing

Icing and wind energy

• Icing interferes with aerodynamics of blades => reduced power production.

• Icing causes unbalanced mass => faster fatigue of material.

• Icing might cause ice throw => safety risk

• Thus, knowledge about icing is important:

• for planning = icing maps• during operation = forecasts

T. Wallenius: The effect of Icing on energy production losses of wind turbines with different control strategies, EWEC 2008

Page 3: EWEC 2009: Modelling wind flow  19 March 2009 qua

3

EWEC 2009, 19 March 2009 – Dierer et al.: Modelling the risk of icing

Risk of icing in Europe: icing days per year

Source: Tammelin, B., Cavaliere, M., Holttinen, H., Morgan, C., Seifert, H., Säntti, K., Wind Energy Production in Cold Climate, Meteorological Publications No. 41, Finnish Meteorological Institute, Helsinki. 2000.

Icing frequency [days/year] Annual loss of production

< 1 Not significant

1 – 10 small

10 – 30 5 – 15%

30 – 60 15 – 25%

> 60 > 25%

T. Laakso, H. Holttinen, G. Ronsten, L.Tallhaug, R.Horbaty, I. Baring-Gould, A. Lacroix, E. Peltola, B. Tammelin, 2005: State-of-the-art of wind energy in cold climate, IEA Wind Annex XIX, 53 p. http:\arcticwind.vtt.fi, date of access 12.3.2009

No icing< 1 day/year2 -7 days/year

8 – 14 days/year15 - 30 days/year> 30 days/year

Page 4: EWEC 2009: Modelling wind flow  19 March 2009 qua

4

EWEC 2009, 19 March 2009 – Dierer et al.: Modelling the risk of icing

COST-727 “Measuring and forecasting atmospheric icing on structures”

Sensor Technology

MeteorologigalMeasurements

Input

MODEL

Output

Application

ForecastingDesign Ice Loadson Structures

Power Losses ofWind Turbines

IcingMeasurements

Measurements

Modelling

Aim of the current study:Coupling a weather model with an icing algorithm and test for different regions improve method for icing map calculation Evaluate the potential of icing forecasts

• Aim: – improved understanding of

in-cloud icing, wet snow and freezing rain in different European regions

– enhance the potential to observe, monitor and forecast icing

• Method:– In-situ icing measurements at

six stations in different regions of Europe

– Development and evaluation of icing models

Page 5: EWEC 2009: Modelling wind flow  19 March 2009 qua

5

EWEC 2009, 19 March 2009 – Dierer et al.: Modelling the risk of icing

Overview

• Method and models

• Results Luosto, Finland

• Results Gütsch, Switzerland

• Icing forecasts Schwyberg, Switzerland

• Summary

Page 6: EWEC 2009: Modelling wind flow  19 March 2009 qua

6

EWEC 2009, 19 March 2009 – Dierer et al.: Modelling the risk of icing

Method and models

Page 7: EWEC 2009: Modelling wind flow  19 March 2009 qua

7

EWEC 2009, 19 March 2009 – Dierer et al.: Modelling the risk of icing

Model system for icing simulations

Algorithm to calculate icing on structures (Makkonen, 2000)

Wind, temperature, cloud and rain water

Simulated ice load

Page 8: EWEC 2009: Modelling wind flow  19 March 2009 qua

8

EWEC 2009, 19 March 2009 – Dierer et al.: Modelling the risk of icing

Mesoscale weather model WRF

• Up-to-date mesoscale atmospheric model for:– Operational weather forecasts– Research purposes

• Application range:– Starting from large eddy simulations: Δx = 100m– Up to regional climate simulations: Δx = 100km

Page 9: EWEC 2009: Modelling wind flow  19 March 2009 qua

9

EWEC 2009, 19 March 2009 – Dierer et al.: Modelling the risk of icing

Algorithm for calculating icing on structures (Makkonen, 2000)

• Model by Makkonen (2000) calculates ice load on a cylinder caused by cloud droplets accretion

• Input:– cloud water content– cloud droplet concentration– wind– temperature

• Output:– ice mass

Page 10: EWEC 2009: Modelling wind flow  19 March 2009 qua

10

EWEC 2009, 19 March 2009 – Dierer et al.: Modelling the risk of icing

Results Luosto, Finland

Page 11: EWEC 2009: Modelling wind flow  19 March 2009 qua

11

EWEC 2009, 19 March 2009 – Dierer et al.: Modelling the risk of icing

Luosto, 23 – 25 December 2007:

Page 12: EWEC 2009: Modelling wind flow  19 March 2009 qua

12

EWEC 2009, 19 March 2009 – Dierer et al.: Modelling the risk of icing

Luosto, 21 – 25 December 2007: time series of measured wind, temperature and ice load

• WRF simulation at 800m grid size• ECMWF data as initial and boundary data• Cloud droplet number concentration: est. 75 1/cm3

Page 13: EWEC 2009: Modelling wind flow  19 March 2009 qua

13

EWEC 2009, 19 March 2009 – Dierer et al.: Modelling the risk of icing

Luosto, 23 – 25 December 2007: time series of measured and simulated ice load

WRF simulation at 2.4 km grid size WRF simulation at 0.8 km grid size

Page 14: EWEC 2009: Modelling wind flow  19 March 2009 qua

14

EWEC 2009, 19 March 2009 – Dierer et al.: Modelling the risk of icing

Results Gütsch, Switzerland

Page 15: EWEC 2009: Modelling wind flow  19 March 2009 qua

15

EWEC 2009, 19 March 2009 – Dierer et al.: Modelling the risk of icing

Positions of icing measurements in Switzerland

Prevailing wind direction22 – 24 November 2007

Page 16: EWEC 2009: Modelling wind flow  19 March 2009 qua

16

EWEC 2009, 19 March 2009 – Dierer et al.: Modelling the risk of icing

Gütsch, 23 November 2007, 08 UTC: vertical cross section of hydrometeors

Position of Gütsch site

Wind direction

South North

Page 17: EWEC 2009: Modelling wind flow  19 March 2009 qua

17

EWEC 2009, 19 March 2009 – Dierer et al.: Modelling the risk of icing

Gütsch, 22 - 24 November 2007: time series of simulated ice load - WRF at Δx = 2.4 and 0.8 km

WRF simulation, Δx=2.4 km

Maximum ice load 0.0 kg/m Maximum ice load 1.3 kg/mWRF simulation, Δx=0.8 km

Page 18: EWEC 2009: Modelling wind flow  19 March 2009 qua

18

EWEC 2009, 19 March 2009 – Dierer et al.: Modelling the risk of icing

Gütsch, 22 - 24 November 2007: sensitivity regarding droplet number concentration

WRF, Δx=800m, Nd = 35 1/cm3

Maximum ice load 1.3 kg/m Maximum ice load 0.9 kg/mWRF, Δx=800m, Nd = 70 1/cm3

Page 19: EWEC 2009: Modelling wind flow  19 March 2009 qua

19

EWEC 2009, 19 March 2009 – Dierer et al.: Modelling the risk of icing

Positions of icing measurements in Switzerland

Page 20: EWEC 2009: Modelling wind flow  19 March 2009 qua

20

EWEC 2009, 19 March 2009 – Dierer et al.: Modelling the risk of icing

Icing forecasts for Schwyberg, Switzerland using the COSMO model

Schwyberg,12.11.2008

Schwyberg,21.11.2008

Schwyberg,11.12.2008

Ice load is simulated driving the Makkonen model with results of the Swiss operational weather forecast model COSMO-2 at 2.2 km grid size

Page 21: EWEC 2009: Modelling wind flow  19 March 2009 qua

21

EWEC 2009, 19 March 2009 – Dierer et al.: Modelling the risk of icing

Summary

• Good results regarding – capturing icing events– the timing of icing events

• Quantitative forecast of ice load less precise – Accuracy of measurements uncertain – Difficulties to define the most suitable grid box

• Strong sensitivity regarding horizontal resolution and cloud droplet concentration

• First results of icing forecasts for Switzerland indicate that there is a potential to forecast icing events

Page 22: EWEC 2009: Modelling wind flow  19 March 2009 qua

22

EWEC 2009, 19 March 2009 – Dierer et al.: Modelling the risk of icing

Thank you for your attention