experience with the application of ahp method in the employee's competency profile of institute...
TRANSCRIPT
EXPERIENCE WITH THE APPLICATION OF AHP METHOD IN THE EMPLOYEE'S
COMPETENCY PROFILE OF INSTITUTE OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND
MANAGEMENT
Ing. Lukáš JuríkIng. Monika ŠujakováProf. Ing. Peter Sakál
The paper is a part of the submitted KEGA project No. 037STU-4/2012 Implementation of the subject of “Sustainable Corporate Social Responsibility” into the study programme of Industrial Management in the second degree of study at STU MTF Trnava.
The paper is also part of the upcoming grant VEGA project No. 1/0510/15 "Sustainable Strategic Management vs. sustainable Corporate Social Responsibility vs. Integrated Management System for Strategic Business Units".
2/18
Layout
1 Analysis of University Training for Strategic Managers of the 21ST Century
2 Application of AHP Method for Evaluation Employee of UPIM – Model 1 – EMS QUT (Evaluation model of Sustainability Quality of University Teacher)
3 Application of AHP Method for Evaluation of Teacher Competency Profile of UPIM – Model 2 – EMSUT (Evaluation Model for Selection of University Teacher)
3/18
1 Analysis of University Training for Strategic Managers of the 21ST Century
A competency approach comes to the fore in the area of teaching activities. Teacher status is now changing. Specialists create a new model of university teacher as a professional. This model is associated with the search for identity of teacher as a high-educated expert on education and teaching. The modern view of the teacher as a professional requires a high level of autonomy, self-awareness and self-control in the performance of his profession.
4/18
2 Application of AHP Method for Evaluation Employee of UPIM – Model 1 – EMS QUT (Evaluation Model of
Sustainability Quality of University Teacher)
Competency profile of teacher is a summary of key competencies and from stemming therefrom capabilities, which characterize the performance profession.
Application of AHP method for evaluation of competency profile of an employee Institute of Industrial Engineering and Management was carried out through the use of Expert Choice.
5/18
6/18
2 Application of AHP Method for Evaluation Employee of UPIM – Model 1 – EMS QUT (Evaluation Model of
Sustainability Quality of University Teacher)
The starting point for the application of AHP method is to create a hierarchical structure. Top element of the hierarchical structure is goal of problem.Determination of objective decision-makingThe aim was to evaluate the competency profile of an employee of Institute of Industrial Engineering and Management. Alternatives of solutionAlternative of solution represent the employees of Institute of Industrial Engineering and Management of Faculty of Materials Science and Technology in Trnava. It was selected sample of five employees of the Institute, who provided their data for processing proposal competency profile.
7/18
2 Application of AHP Method for Evaluation Employee of UPIM – Model 1 – EMS QUT (Evaluation Model of
Sustainability Quality of University Teacher)
Proposal of criteria for evaluation of alternatives solve
8/18
2 Application of AHP Method for Evaluation Employee of UPIM – Model 1 – EMS QUT (Evaluation Model of
Sustainability Quality of University Teacher)
9/18
2 Application of AHP Method for Evaluation Employee of UPIM – Model 1 – EMS QUT (Evaluation Model of
Sustainability Quality of University Teacher)
Proposal of criteria for evaluation of alternatives solve
Solving the problem through use of the software Expert Choice: Determination and input of objective criteria and alternatives
to the decision problem. Assigning weight to individual criterion by pairwise
comparison of criteria. Evaluation of alternatives by paired comparisons for individual
criteria. Evaluation of the optimal alternative solution.
10/18
2 Application of AHP Method for Evaluation Employee of UPIM – Model 1 – EMS QUT (Evaluation Model of
Sustainability Quality of University Teacher)
Determine the weights of criteriaIn the figure, can be seen that the most important criterion of first-level hierarchical structure is the criterion Cooperation and the criterion Qualification has the lowest weight.
11/18
2 Application of AHP Method for Evaluation Employee of UPIM – Model 1 – EMS QUT (Evaluation Model of
Sustainability Quality of University Teacher)
Evaluation of alternatives The employees of UPIM MTF STU are named as P1, P2, P3, P4 and P5 in tables. Figure shows the ranking of employees. Most competent employee is employee P1, then employees P2, P5, P3 and on last position is employee P4.
12/18
2 Application of AHP Method for Evaluation Employee of UPIM – Model 1 – EMS QUT (Evaluation Model of
Sustainability Quality of University Teacher)
3 Application of AHP Method for Evaluation of Teacher Competency Profile of UPIM – Model 2 – EMSUT (Evaluation Model for Selection of University Teacher)
Other model was designed based on recommendations from the personnel department faculty. It is competency model for the assessment of candidates for a job position as a university teacher.
Determination of objective decision-makingThe objective of decision-making was to determine
selection of the most suitable candidate for the job position of university teacher and to creating of Model 2, as the proposal of competency profile of candidate to job position of teacher of Institute Industrial Engineering and Management.
13/18
Alternatives of solutionAlternative solutions are presented by employees of
Institute of Industrial Engineering and Management MTF STU in Trnava. Employees were contacted through a questionnaire. It was selected sample 6 random respondents.
14/18
3 Application of AHP Method for Evaluation of Teacher Competency Profile of UPIM – Model 2 – EMSUT (Evaluation Model for Selection of University Teacher)
For the Model 2 was selected 12 key criteria that candidate have to met by the for the job position of teacher of UPIM namely: Knowledge of a foreign language; Tolerance (multicultural thinking); Ability to lead of people; Ability to motivate of people; Empathy; Critical thinking; Ability of self-control; Nature and natural intelligence; Diligence; Responsibility; Knowledge of the subject taught; Communication and rhetorical skills;
15/18
3 Application of AHP Method for Evaluation of Teacher Competency Profile of UPIM – Model 2 – EMSUT (Evaluation Model for Selection of University Teacher)
Determine the weights of criteriaIn Figure, it can be seen that the most important criterion is Responsibility and criterion Knowledge of foreign language has the least weight.
16/18
3 Application of AHP Method for Evaluation of Teacher Competency Profile of UPIM – Model 2 – EMSUT (Evaluation Model for Selection of University Teacher)
Evaluation of alternativesEvaluation of alternatives can be performed by using the pairwise comparisons. Respondent indicated as P1 is on the first position, followed by the respondent labelled P5 and respondent P3 takes last position.
17/18
3 Application of AHP Method for Evaluation of Teacher Competency Profile of UPIM – Model 2 – EMSUT (Evaluation Model for Selection of University Teacher)
