Pragmatism is more valued than quality of life in your society.

Pragmatism-ve:- Material tangible > less tangible/ material outcomes- Extrinsic motivations > intrinsic motivation+ve:- Focus on realistic/ practical/ feasible, rather than overly unrealistic/ idealistic processes and outcomes

Quality of life- Work-life balance- Family relations (eg. raising children, filial piety)

Make quality of life of aging better, put in place incentives that make people focus on tangible stuff because they are pragmatic)

- Civic participation (eg. community service)- Ethics and values (eg. compassion, integrity)- Personal passion, fulfilment in life (eg. less trodden/ conventional choices)

Singaporeans 2nd most overworked people in the world.

0%: RejectionPragmatism is largely rejected by a public/ the masses who recognise the unacceptable costs of sacrificing ethical principles in both daily/ public life. Eg. Public displeasure over the setting of Integrated Resorts, anchored by casinos/ legalised gambling

25%: wariness, preference for qualityIncreasingly, youths adopt a wary view towards pragmatism when engaging in civic participation, preferring to emphasis intrinsic values associated with it (altruism, compassion, selflessness, passion).

50%: ambivalent, nuanced/ fine-tunedBalance pragmatism with quality of life in managing family relations and government policies related to the issue. Eg. Maintenance of parents act

75%: favourable viewPragmatism is favoured over less tangible goals in our approach toward education as it is a realistic means of dealing with the challenges of doing well in life.

100%: overwhelmingly valuedPragmatism overwhelmingly valued over work-life balance basis to acquire important economic goods and outcomes (individual and national level)

An inclusive society is merely a dream. How true is this of your society?

Inclusivity:- No one is left out, opportunities for all- Compassion, empathy, sensitivity- Social cohesion/ interdependent link

Differences/ interactions- Rich-poor divide/ gap- Ethnic groups: perceptions vs. misperceptions - Natives (citizens and PRs) vs. foreigners (foreign talent, migrant workers)- Religions and followers/ believers- Mainstream vs. peripheral groups (homosexuals, ex-offenders)- Activist causes- Elitist vs. masses

0%: already a reality, able to sustainEthnics groups: Lingering misperceptions national inclusivity not clearly envisioned by significant minority (eg. insensitive comments), exclusionary educational policies

25%: realistic, achievableRich-poor divide lessened with greater assistance by rich to poor, inclusive society is a realistic goal to strive for.

50%: projected by putting in place right measures/ not clearly envisioned (public perception)

75%: unrealisticMainstream society: way of media messages/ public education campaigns that encourage acceptance of peripheral groups (eg. ex-offenders)

100%: fantasy, impossible dream