f. gheusi, j.-p. cammas, j.-p. chaboureau, j. duron, c. mari, p. mascart and j.-p. pinty

15
A regional-model « climatology » of vertical mass and water-vapour transport for the Hibiscus-Troccinox- Troccibras campaign 2004 F. Gheusi, J.-P. Cammas, J.- P. Chaboureau, J. Duron, C. Mari, P. Mascart and J.-P. Pinty Laboratoire d’Aérologie Toulouse (France)

Upload: yardley-carver

Post on 30-Dec-2015

27 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

A regional-model « climatology » of vertical mass and water-vapour transport for the Hibiscus-Troccinox-Troccibras campaign 2004. F. Gheusi, J.-P. Cammas, J.-P. Chaboureau, J. Duron, C. Mari, P. Mascart and J.-P. Pinty Laboratoire d’Aérologie Toulouse (France). - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: F. Gheusi, J.-P. Cammas, J.-P.  Chaboureau, J. Duron, C. Mari, P. Mascart and J.-P. Pinty

A regional-model « climatology » of vertical mass and water-

vapour transport for the Hibiscus-Troccinox-Troccibras

campaign 2004

F. Gheusi, J.-P. Cammas, J.-P. Chaboureau, J. Duron, C. Mari, P. Mascart

and J.-P. Pinty

Laboratoire d’Aérologie

Toulouse (France)

Page 2: F. Gheusi, J.-P. Cammas, J.-P.  Chaboureau, J. Duron, C. Mari, P. Mascart and J.-P. Pinty

Meso-NH forecast support during the campaign (1)

Resolution = 30 kmDomain 3000 km x 3000 km

« Radar » rectangle

Mass budget (arbitrarily) restricted

to this area

Page 3: F. Gheusi, J.-P. Cammas, J.-P.  Chaboureau, J. Duron, C. Mari, P. Mascart and J.-P. Pinty

Meso-NH forecast support during the campaign (2)

Daily time-period considered for• vertical air-displacement• integration of mass budgets

06 UTC06 UTC 24 UTC24 UTC

Set of 30 simulations from 05 Feb to 05 Mar

Makes possible some statistics !

Page 4: F. Gheusi, J.-P. Cammas, J.-P.  Chaboureau, J. Duron, C. Mari, P. Mascart and J.-P. Pinty

Wind-strength @ z = 1500 m

Some climatological features

(30-day averaged fields)P + wind @ z = 3000 m

Temp. °C (colorscale)-2 PVU tropopause (dashed)Zonal wind (dotted)

SACZ

verticalcross-section

Page 5: F. Gheusi, J.-P. Cammas, J.-P.  Chaboureau, J. Duron, C. Mari, P. Mascart and J.-P. Pinty

Mean daily vertical motion (06-24 UTC)

S-N cross-section: z = z – z0 (km) z0 (m) @ z = 6000 m

SACZ

Page 6: F. Gheusi, J.-P. Cammas, J.-P.  Chaboureau, J. Duron, C. Mari, P. Mascart and J.-P. Pinty

Mass budget computation: a post-processing method

z

Surface = air-parcels with common initial altitude z0

x

z0

Upward mass flux through z0

between t0 and t:

Air-parcels that • were initially below z0

• are finally above z0

Mass flux between t0 and t

=Mass of the colored

volume

Model run: transport of a passive tracerinitialized with the altitude, then …

Page 7: F. Gheusi, J.-P. Cammas, J.-P.  Chaboureau, J. Duron, C. Mari, P. Mascart and J.-P. Pinty

Mass budget computation: what was performed

3000 m

6000 m

9000 m

12000 m

15000 m

18000 m

21000 m

= flux 06-24 UTC (up / down)

Net flux = up - down

For each day (simulation Day 1)

Computation for 30 days: few seconds on a Linux PC !

Mass flux = dry air or water-vapour

Page 8: F. Gheusi, J.-P. Cammas, J.-P.  Chaboureau, J. Duron, C. Mari, P. Mascart and J.-P. Pinty

Qualitative comparison against rain satellite-retrievals (TRMM,

125x125 km²)Net Flux (Up - Down)

-100

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

01-m

ars-

04

02-m

ars-

04

03-m

ars-

04

04-m

ars-

04

05-m

ars-

04

Day

-25

0

25

50

75

100

125

150

175

24h precip (mm/day)

6000m

9000m

12000m

OBS RAIN

Mixed results, better with sub-grid cloud fraction ? To be tested…

06 Februaryheavy-rainover Bauru,

good forecast !

14 Februaryactive front,forecasted too late…

28 Februarygood !

diurnal convection period,

not good…

3-4 Marchnot so bad

Page 9: F. Gheusi, J.-P. Cammas, J.-P.  Chaboureau, J. Duron, C. Mari, P. Mascart and J.-P. Pinty

Dry-air mass budget30-day averaged mass fluxes (Day 1)

0

3000

6000

9000

12000

15000

18000

21000

24000

-300 -200 -100 0 100 200 300 400 500 600

Net Flux

Alt

itu

de

Net Flux

Vert div

Page 10: F. Gheusi, J.-P. Cammas, J.-P.  Chaboureau, J. Duron, C. Mari, P. Mascart and J.-P. Pinty

Dry-air mass budgetMost convective 10 days, avg mass fluxes (Day 1)

0

3000

6000

9000

12000

15000

18000

21000

24000

-300 -200 -100 0 100 200 300 400 500 600

Net Flux

Alt

itu

de

Net Flux

Vert div

Criterion: Max( flux(9000m) + flux (12000m) )

Page 11: F. Gheusi, J.-P. Cammas, J.-P.  Chaboureau, J. Duron, C. Mari, P. Mascart and J.-P. Pinty

Dry-air mass budgetLeast convective 10 days, avg mass fluxes (Day 1)

0

3000

6000

9000

12000

15000

18000

21000

24000

-300 -200 -100 0 100 200 300 400 500 600

Net Flux

Alt

itu

de

Net Flux

Vert div

Criterion: Min( flux(9000m) + flux (12000m) )

Page 12: F. Gheusi, J.-P. Cammas, J.-P.  Chaboureau, J. Duron, C. Mari, P. Mascart and J.-P. Pinty

Water-vapor flux:qualitative comparison against rain

satellite retrievals (TRMM, 125x125 km²)

Better correlation with the « observed » precipitation

Net Flux (Up - Down)

-200

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

01-m

ars-

04

02-m

ars-

04

03-m

ars-

04

04-m

ars-

04

05-m

ars-

04

Day

-25

0

25

50

75

100

125

150

175

24h precip (mm/day)

6000m

9000m

12000m

OBS RAIN

Page 13: F. Gheusi, J.-P. Cammas, J.-P.  Chaboureau, J. Duron, C. Mari, P. Mascart and J.-P. Pinty

Water-vapour mass budget

30-day averaged mass fluxes (Day 1)

0

3000

6000

9000

12000

15000

18000

21000

24000

-300 -200 -100 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800

Net Flux

Alt

itu

de Net Flux

Vert div

Net Source

Page 14: F. Gheusi, J.-P. Cammas, J.-P.  Chaboureau, J. Duron, C. Mari, P. Mascart and J.-P. Pinty

ConclusionsNumerical aspects• 30 MesoNH runs in forecast mode: statistical approach

over the period 05 Feb – 05 Mar 2004.• Flux computation based on

– On-line passive transport of initial-coordinate tracers– Low-cost and highly adaptable post-processing (PC)

Vertical motion « model climatology »• Subsidence in the lower troposphere, S of the SACZ• Largest ascent just below the tropopause, N of the SACZ• Slight but significant subsidence above the tropopause convergence in the TTL, no export in the stratosphereVertical mass budget• Downward flux in the lower stratosphere• Upward flux maximum at 9000m (6000m for WV)• Mass and humidity convergence in the TTL

Page 15: F. Gheusi, J.-P. Cammas, J.-P.  Chaboureau, J. Duron, C. Mari, P. Mascart and J.-P. Pinty

Future work

• Work with better simulation sets

• Compare findings and observations

• Investigate the diurnal evolution of the vertical

transport