fadzai mukonoweshuro - improving nutrition for … nutrition for caregivers and children in...
TRANSCRIPT
Improving nutrition for caregivers and
children in difficult circumstances :
Promising strategies, Southern Africa:
Fadzai Mukonoweshuro
GRM International
Children and HIV: Family Support
July 16th and 17th 2010
Vienna, Austria
Introduction
• The nutrition challenge in the context of HIV
and AIDS in southern Africa
• Promising livelihood actions with nutrition
outcomes for carers and children in difficult
circumstances
• Lessons : • case studies undertaken by the UN partners in
Southern Africa
• PRP programme in Zimbabwe
Background
• Complex food insecurity situation and rising incidence of malnutrition in Southern Africa
• Malnutrition is particularly acute among children living with HIV and infants
• Challenges in meeting food security, care practices and health services – although ART is becoming more and more available
• 17 Million children orphaned by AIDS
• OVC living with carers most elderly
• Extended families care for more than 90% of all double orphans and single orphans not living with the surviving parent in sub-Saharan
Nutrition situation in Southern Africa • Zimbabwe - prevalence of stunting is highest
among maternal orphans (CNMSS, 2008)
• Malawi – 48 % U5 suffering from moderate and severe stunting (The State of the World’s Children
2007 )
• Humanitarian concerns e.g. Cholera outbreak -
• Skipped-generation household (SGHs) –grandparents (65+) care for roughly 60% of all orphans in Zimbabwe (UNICEF, 2007
• Burden of care on women and children
Snap shot of Nutritional Status among children
in Zimbabwe – Boys/Girls
37.9
32.5
13.1
10.5
2.91.9
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
30.0
35.0
40.0
Male Female Male Female Male Female
Stunting Underweight Wasting
MIMS, 2009
Determinants of Nutrition status
Background
Characteristics
Background
Characteristics
Health Services
and environment
Caring Practices
Food security Dietary Intake Dietary Intake
Disease
So……..
• Income poverty contributing to food
insecurity, inadequate care and unhealthy
household environment – need for
sustainable economic livelihood strategies
• But….. Not everything necessary for adequate
nutrition can be bought – health, gender
equity, clean water
UN and Partners Alliance
Malawi � Community Based Organisations -
Tawonga (10 Villages ), Chitundu (9 Villages ) and Good News (36 Villages) - Total of 6000 vulnerable children
� Main objective- strengthen livelihood strategies with nutrition outcomes for carers and vulnerable children
� Community initiated and managed
Agro-based
• Communal gardens – food diversity
• Staple food production for consumption and
income-generation
• Small stock for asset accumulation and
income generation – Guinea fowls, K100,000
per year from about 2,000 eggs from ten fowls
(each hen lays about 250-300 eggs per year)
• Agricultural skills for teenage children
Off-farm
• Development of artisanal skills - tailoring
• Communal maize mill
• Village loans
Health and sanitation
• Provision of basic medicines to OVC
• Provision of potable water and sanitation facilities.
Effectiveness
• 3 meals provided to children on a daily basis-
• Increased food production – able to buy farm
implements from village loans
• Predictable access to food and nutrition
security for children throughout the year
Food item Qty/child/yr
(Kg)
Unit cost
(K/Kg)
Cost/child/y
r (K)
Maize 112 40 4,480
Vegetables 29.2 70 2,044
Meat 29.2 500 14,600
Beans 29.2 200 5,840
Others (sugar, salt, tea,
cooking oil, etc)
5,000
Total annual food cost 31,964
(US$228.31)
The annual cost of feeding a child at Good News
UN and Partners Alliance - Programme of
Support – Zimbabwe
409,926 beneficiaries (by February 2010 )
Two key interventions focusing on nutrition
1. Supplementary feeding:
� children did not complain of hunger (67.7%)
� Improved health status (30.9%).
2. Nutrition gardens:
� increased food access and health status;
� beneficiaries reported children could buy text books and pens (17.4%),
� increased number of meals (21.7%)
� Improved quality of meals (13%).
Nutrition gardens low on contribution to
dietary diversity for targeted children but
contributed to other household requirements
PRP – Zimbabwe
Household food security and nutrition enhanced through sustainable and improved productivity and income generation
•Nationwide - urban & rural •Target includes Carers and children in difficult circumstances
• Reaches 2 million Zimbabweans (20% of the population)
PRP II: The Approach
Instrument Social
protection Livelihoods
promotion
Food and
nutrition
Security
Cash transfers High Medium High
Food vouchers Medium Low Medium
Targeted inputs Medium High Medium
Nutrition gardens (W) High Medium High
Conservation farming Low High High
Small livestock (W) Medium High Medium
Watsan (W) Low Medium Medium
Home-based care (W)
High Low Medium
VS&L (W) Medium Medium Low
New crops Low Medium Medium
Agri Training Low High High
Conservation Agriculture-availability
Garden support-Increase availability of diverse vegetable
Small Livestock support- Increase availability and access
Cash Transfers and ISALs-Increased access to food 75% of ISAL Increased # of meals
Food Vouchers-increase access to food
WASH- availability of clean and safe water and dignified sanitation
Conservation agriculture Increased Yields- increase food
availability
Yield data (kg/ha) from ICRISAT panel study data : (All Natural Regions including high yielding areas)
Comparisons of
CA versus non CA
Season CA Non CA
2007 1,590 765
2008 1,114 407
2009 1,546 970
2010 1,209 658
Natural Region Yield in Kg/HA
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Food Education Human
health
Livestock Housing Farming Clothing Ceremony
Perc
enta
ge o
f fa
rmers
Cattle Goats
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Live
stoc
k
Rem
ittan
ces
Veg
etab
les
Cro
p fa
rmin
gC
asual l
abor
Man
ufact
urin
g
Fores
t pro
ducts
Form
al em
ploym
ent
Alc
ohol
bre
win
gR
etail
shop
Ven
ding
Fish s
ales
Gol
d min
ing
Cro
ss b
order
trad
eFai
th h
ealin
gTra
nspor
t
Perc
en
tag
e o
f fa
rmers
Rank 1 Rank 2 Rank 3
Food Access: Livestock as important source of cash income – most households are net buyers of food
Use of transfer by type of
spending
Assets Household Items IGAs
Livestock
Goats: Meat, milk,
cheese, income,
Chicken: Meat, eggs,
income
Staple: 50% spent
Cereal
Non Staple:
Cooking oil
Sugar
Salt,
Vegetables,
Meat
Kapenta fish
Other
Grinding mill
Transport to health facility
Blankets
Petty trade
Projects such as
sewing
$0
$50
$100
$150
$200
$250
$300
$350
$400
$450
S1 S2 S3 S1 S2 S3
V.Poor Poor
se
as
on
al
inc
om
eother income cash transfer
Gweru Urban, Income, Season 1, 2 & 3
$0
$50
$100
$150
$200
$250
$300
$350
$400
S1 S2 S3 S1 S2 S3
V.Poor Poor
se
as
on
al
ex
pe
ns
es
social services
productive inputs
hh items
non-staple food
staple food
What is the cash transfer for? Is it
sufficient?: AAID and JI-Gweru Urban
Gweru Urban Expenses, Season 1, 2 & 3
Spending on social services about equals the cash transfer.
Graduated packages – whole community
benefits
Poorest / non-viable -Child headed
-Elder headed + orphans
-Chronically ill / disabled headed
-High dependency ratios
Poor / viable -Land
- HH economically active members
Community benefits
Cash transfers
Nutrition gardens
Small livestock
Agricultural inputs
Agricultural inputs &
training
Conservation farming
Small livestock
Nutrition gardens
VS&L
Water & sanitation
Small dams & irrigation
Market invigoration
Agri training
Health clubs
Lessons
increased food production can improve income,
which, in turn, can improve consumption
patterns. The evidence shows that this is more
likely to occur under the following conditions:
· The incremental income is earned or controlled
by women
· The stream of income is regular or frequent,
even if the absolute amounts are small
· Training in health and nutrition is provided
Lessons
• Framework for promoting livelihoods - NPAs
• Community initiated intervention more
successful – ISALS, Village savings
• Health clubs approach – promising
• Chronically ill disappearing – able bodied
carers