failure mechanisms in twill-weave laminates: fem predictions vs. experiments by

27
Failure Mechanisms in Twill-weave Laminates: FEM Predictions vs. Experiments by Gianni Nicoletto and Enrica Riva Dipartimento di Ingegneria Industriale Università di Parma Parma, Italy COMPTEST 2003 Chalons en Champagne, France Jan. 28, 2003

Upload: edana

Post on 09-Jan-2016

38 views

Category:

Documents


4 download

DESCRIPTION

Failure Mechanisms in Twill-weave Laminates: FEM Predictions vs. Experiments by Gianni Nicoletto and Enrica Riva Dipartimento di Ingegneria Industriale Università di Parma Parma, Italy. COMPTEST 2003 Chalons en Champagne, France Jan. 28, 2003. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Failure Mechanisms in Twill-weave Laminates: FEM Predictions vs. Experiments by

Failure Mechanisms in Twill-weave Laminates:FEM Predictions vs. Experiments

 by 

Gianni Nicoletto and Enrica Riva

Dipartimento di Ingegneria Industriale Università di Parma

Parma, Italy

COMPTEST 2003 Chalons en Champagne, France

Jan. 28, 2003

Page 2: Failure Mechanisms in Twill-weave Laminates: FEM Predictions vs. Experiments by

Outline

COMPTEST 2003 Chalons en Champagne G. Nicoletto & E. Riva

• Introduction e motivation

• Related works

• Twill-weave laminate chacterization

• Finite element modeling

• Experimental observations and computational results

• Conclusions

Page 3: Failure Mechanisms in Twill-weave Laminates: FEM Predictions vs. Experiments by

COMPTEST 2003 Chalons en Champagne G. Nicoletto & E. Riva

CFRP Chassis

Cooperation with Dallara Automobili

F3 racing carIRL racing carInfinity Pro

Motivation

Page 4: Failure Mechanisms in Twill-weave Laminates: FEM Predictions vs. Experiments by

Woven Composites

COMPTEST 2003 Chalons en Champagne G. Nicoletto & E. Riva

Definitions

• Yarns: bundle of thousands fibers• Warp yarns: parallel to load direction• Fill yarns: perpendicular to load direction• Texture: plain weave, twill weave, etc. • Crimp ratio: degree of yarn curvature

Advantages

With respect to unidirectional laminates:• Easier handling and shaping • Improved impact resistance • Superior out-of-plane stiffness• Balanced in-plane mechanical properties• Cost competitive

yarn

Page 5: Failure Mechanisms in Twill-weave Laminates: FEM Predictions vs. Experiments by

Objectives of the work

COMPTEST 2003 Chalons en Champagne G. Nicoletto & E. Riva

• Develop a finite element-based modeling approach to the mechanics of woven laminate composites.

• Compare modeling results and experimental observations.

• Analyze the role of texture on mechanical performance.

• Develop tools for monitoring damage development in woven laminates.

Page 6: Failure Mechanisms in Twill-weave Laminates: FEM Predictions vs. Experiments by

Related Modeling Work

• Analytical approach

T.W. Chu et al (1983 - )N.K. Naik et al (1991 - )

COMPTEST 2003 Chalons en Champagne G. Nicoletto & E. Riva

• Models, such as mosaic, crimp and bridging models subjected to iso-strain or iso- stress conditions, predict adequately the stiffness of woven laminates.

• These models are less satisfactory for strength prediction and micromechanical stress determination.

• Convenient approach for texture design.

• The plain-weave texture has been mainly considered.

Page 7: Failure Mechanisms in Twill-weave Laminates: FEM Predictions vs. Experiments by

• Finite element approach

J. Whitcomb et al. (1990-1998)V. Carvelli and C. Poggi (2001)

D. Blackketter et al. (1993)

COMPTEST 2003 Chalons en Champagne G. Nicoletto & E. Riva

• Computational prediction of the mechanics of woven laminate composites.

• The finite element method is used to geometrically model an elementary cell of the woven laminate. • Boundary conditions enforcing stress and strain periodicity are imposed to the representative volume (RV) .

• Stress-based damage and stiffness discount technique to model damage progression.

• Most studies deal with the plain-weave texture.

Page 8: Failure Mechanisms in Twill-weave Laminates: FEM Predictions vs. Experiments by

K. Schulte et al (1988 - )J.C. Abry et al. (1998)

Electrical resistance method applied to unidirectional composites

COMPTEST 2003 Chalons en Champagne G. Nicoletto & E. Riva

Related Experimental Work

Page 9: Failure Mechanisms in Twill-weave Laminates: FEM Predictions vs. Experiments by

COMPTEST 2003 Chalons en Champagne G. Nicoletto & E. Riva

Material and Experiments

Fiber: Toray T-300 carbon fibersFiber diameter: 7 μmFiber volume fraction Vf: 42%Density ρ: 1.76 g/cm2

Strength u3200 MPaElastic modulus E: 228 GPa

Matrix: Epoxy Hexcel 1990S

LaminateLay-up: 8-plyTexture: Twill-weaveYarns: 3k fibersWarp and fill yarns: Identical Laminate thickness: 2.4 mm

• Tensile tests according to: ASTM D3039 • Servo-hydraulic testing machine: MTS 810

• Resistance strain gages & Extensometer

• Electric resistance measuring apparatus

0° direction

Page 10: Failure Mechanisms in Twill-weave Laminates: FEM Predictions vs. Experiments by

COMPTEST 2003 Chalons en Champagne G. Nicoletto & E. Riva

Geometrical Characterization of Twill-weave Texture

Yarn shape: circular arcs

Ply stacking: random

a b g RT RL

2.04 0.17 1.13 6.11 6.15All dimensions in mm

Page 11: Failure Mechanisms in Twill-weave Laminates: FEM Predictions vs. Experiments by

COMPTEST 2003 Chalons en Champaign G. Nicoletto & E. Riva

Tensile Tests and Evolution of Electrical Resistance

Strain

Norm. elect. resistance vs. strain

Stre

ss (

MP

a)

(R-R

0)/R

0

Stress vs. strain

Twill-weave laminates

Page 12: Failure Mechanisms in Twill-weave Laminates: FEM Predictions vs. Experiments by

COMPTEST 2003 Chalons en Champagne G. Nicoletto & E. Riva

Damage Observations

Fill yarn Tow yarn

Epoxy

Fiber fracture Fracture in yarn

Page 13: Failure Mechanisms in Twill-weave Laminates: FEM Predictions vs. Experiments by

COMPTEST 2003 Chalons en Champagne G. Nicoletto & E. Riva

Damage Mechanisms: a Summary

• Final longitudinal fiber fracture is preceeded by a number of mechanisms.

• Matrix cracks develop in fill yarns.

• Delamination occurs between orthogonal yarns.

• Inter-ply delamination is observed

Inter-ply delamination

Crack in fill yarn

Delamination between orthogonal

yarns

Page 14: Failure Mechanisms in Twill-weave Laminates: FEM Predictions vs. Experiments by

Homogeneization Method for Composite Materials

• Assumption of periodic microstructures which can be represented by unit cells

• Asymptotic expansion of all variables and the average technique to determine the homogeneized (macroscopic) material properties and constitutive relations of composite materials

• Prediction of microscopic fields of deformation inside the unit cell through the localization process

COMPTEST 2003 Chalons en Champagne G. Nicoletto & E. Riva

Page 15: Failure Mechanisms in Twill-weave Laminates: FEM Predictions vs. Experiments by

COMPTEST 2003 Chalons en Champagne G. Nicoletto & E. Riva

Texture and Representative Volume RV

Material models:

• Yarn: transverse isotropic, linear elastic

• Matrix: linear elastic

RV

Twill-weave

Page 16: Failure Mechanisms in Twill-weave Laminates: FEM Predictions vs. Experiments by

COMPTEST 2003 Chalons en Champagne G. Nicoletto & E. Riva

Finite Element Modeling of RV

• Parametric geometrical model (I-DEAS)

• Finite element code (ABAQUS)

• Convergence study

• Optimized model: > 30000 elements

• Geometric nonlinearity included

• Progressive damage evolution routine in FORTRAN

Page 17: Failure Mechanisms in Twill-weave Laminates: FEM Predictions vs. Experiments by

COMPTEST 2003 Chalons en Champagne G. Nicoletto & E. Riva

Boundary conditions on RV

Post, Han and Ifju (1994)

)x(u~xExu)x(u 0

Carvelli & Poggi (2001)

where

u(x) is the displacement field in the RVu0 is a rigid displacement of the RV is a small rigid rotation of RVE is the average strain (macroscopic)

of RVũ(x) is a periodic displacement associated

to microscopic strain field within RV

Free surface

Page 18: Failure Mechanisms in Twill-weave Laminates: FEM Predictions vs. Experiments by

Damage Modes for Fiber Yarn

COMPTEST 2003 Chalons en Champagne G. Nicoletto & E. Riva

M. Zako et al (2003)

Page 19: Failure Mechanisms in Twill-weave Laminates: FEM Predictions vs. Experiments by

COMPTEST 2003 Chalons en Champagne G. Nicoletto & E. Riva

Modeling Damage Development

Blackketter et al (1993)Discount method

• Iterative procedure.

• Evaluation at each integration point.

• Normal stress criterion for failure.

• Elastic modulus is reduced to 1/10 of its initial value.

• Role of time step and mesh size.

Page 20: Failure Mechanisms in Twill-weave Laminates: FEM Predictions vs. Experiments by

Effect of Texture on Longitudinal Stiffness

COMPTEST 2003 Chalons en Champagne G. Nicoletto & E. Riva

• Strong influence of crimp ratio on stiffness.

• Good correlation with experimental results.

• A thick laminate is stiffer than a single lamina.

• At high crimp ratios the twill-weave is stiffer than the plain- weave.

Plain weave

Twill weave

Lamina

Thick laminate

Page 21: Failure Mechanisms in Twill-weave Laminates: FEM Predictions vs. Experiments by

COMPTEST 2003 Chalons en Champagne G. Nicoletto & E. Riva

Effect of Crimp Ratio on Stress-Strain Curve

• Strong influence of crimp ratio on stress-strain curve.

• Good correlation with experimental results.

• Low crimp ratio shows a trend linear to failure.

• Influence of computational parameters.

Page 22: Failure Mechanisms in Twill-weave Laminates: FEM Predictions vs. Experiments by

Stresses and Damage

COMPTEST 2003 Chalons en Champagne G. Nicoletto & E. Riva

0

200

400

600

800

0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6

Strain (%)

Str

ess

(MP

a)

ab

cd Step a

• The critical stress is perpendicular to the fill yarn surface.

• The wedge elements of the straight portion of the fill yarns fail first.

• Initial damage occurs near the fill yarns.

• The critical stress is representative of damage initiation in the matrix.

Page 23: Failure Mechanisms in Twill-weave Laminates: FEM Predictions vs. Experiments by

COMPTEST 2003 Chalons en Champagne G. Nicoletto & E. Riva

0

200

400

600

800

0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6

Strain (%)

Str

ess

(MP

a)

ab

cd Step b

• The critical stress direction does not change. It is perpendicular to the fill yarn surface.

• Damage continues in the fill yarns.

• Damage now involves the brick elements next to the wedge elements.

• The damage spreads into the matrix.

Stresses and Damage

Page 24: Failure Mechanisms in Twill-weave Laminates: FEM Predictions vs. Experiments by

COMPTEST 2003 Chalons en Champagne G. Nicoletto & E. Riva

0

200

400

600

800

0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6

Strain (%)

Str

ess

(MP

a)

ab

cd Step c

• The wedge elements, where the two perpendicular yarns are close to each other, fail.

• Fiber failure occurs in the fill yarn.

• Failure occurs where the yarn is curved to the maximum.

Stresses and Damage

Page 25: Failure Mechanisms in Twill-weave Laminates: FEM Predictions vs. Experiments by

COMPTEST 2003 Chalons en Champagne G. Nicoletto & E. Riva

0

200

400

600

800

0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6

Strain (%)

Str

ess

(MP

a)

ab

cd Step d

• Failure extends to the neighboring brick elements up to final catastrophic collapse.

• In this final stage different failure modes are activated such as transverse and longitudinal shear, and transverse direct stress.

Stresses and Damage

Page 26: Failure Mechanisms in Twill-weave Laminates: FEM Predictions vs. Experiments by

COMPTEST 2003 Chalons en Champagne G. Nicoletto & E. Riva

Inter-ply delamination

Crack in fill yarn

Delamination between orthogonal

yarns

Qualitative Correlation

Experimental

Computational

Page 27: Failure Mechanisms in Twill-weave Laminates: FEM Predictions vs. Experiments by

Conclusions

COMPTEST 2003 Chalons en Champagne G. Nicoletto & E. Riva

• Optical inspection of a twill-weave laminate during tensile testing showed different damage mechanisms.

• Finite element modelling of an appropriate RV provided the macroscopic stress-strain relation of a woven laminate that were compared to experimental results.

• The finite element model of the RV provided the microscopic stresses and strains within matrix and reinforcements.

• An iterative procedure based on a damage routine has been developed to simulate damage evolution.

• A first correlation between experimental observations and computed damage evolution in a twill-weave laminate is encouraging.